Slashdot Mirror


Siri Competitor Evi Arrives, But Already Overloaded

mikejuk writes "Evi, a new rival to Siri, Apple's voice-driven personal assistant, has made its debut on both the iPhone and Android. And people are so keen to that Evi's servers are overloaded — so be prepared for a wait for answers." The app costs 99 cents for iOS users, but it's free on Android.

233 comments

  1. SpeakToIt Assistant by sandytaru · · Score: 2, Informative

    Was there first.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe so but look at the permissions that SpeakToIt Assistant requires. It's a bit scary:

      THIS APPLICATION HAS ACCESS TO THE FOLLOWING:
      SERVICES THAT COST YOU MONEY
      DIRECTLY CALL PHONE NUMBERS
      Allows the application to call phone numbers without your intervention. Malicious applications may cause unexpected calls on your phone bill. Note that this does not allow the application to call emergency numbers.
      SEND SMS MESSAGES
      Allows application to send SMS messages. Malicious applications may cost you money by sending messages without your confirmation.

    2. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, scary, but isn't that expected? Isn't one of the features of Siri calling and texting people for you?

    3. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps but I am not sure if it means without intervention (i.e. I am in another room and it sends a text to a premium number) or if it means I tell it to call X and it does so without me confirming. The latter would be OK obviously since I am authorizing it. I guess it just needs clarification as one way is bad whereas the other is expected.

    4. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Thats a shorter list then what Evi asks for. Frankly, I think I'll wait till Googles version "Iris".

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by ksemlerK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Iris already exists: Iris for Android

    6. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by game+kid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Microsoft will kill Iris with their own sentient copycat, "Zero". Then Zero will get stricken by melancholy and drown out its sorrows by searching on Bing.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    7. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Well OK then.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by CodeReign · · Score: 1

      Eh? I like my phone just taking orders when I long press the search button. Fuck talking back to me.

    9. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by jamesh · · Score: 5, Informative

      DIRECTLY CALL PHONE NUMBERS

      1. Purchase pay-to-call and pay-to-sms services
      2. Stand on street corner with megaphone yelling out instructions for phones to dial and message my numbers
      3. Profit!

      In fact you could just buy ads during popular TV shows that clearly speak the same instructions...

    10. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Similarly, the developer's claim to be "The world's first question-answering platform" is a bit of a brazen lie, especially when Ask Jeeves produces a perfectly good inline answer to their demo-question "Is pink single?".

      Am I the only one that gets The Rage over bullshit claims like that?

      (Jeeves tells me he is 14 years old)

    11. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Perhaps but I am not sure if it means without intervention (i.e. I am in another room and it sends a text to a premium number) or if it means I tell it to call X and it does so without me confirming. The latter would be OK obviously since I am authorizing it. I guess it just needs clarification as one way is bad whereas the other is expected.

      Isn't the assumption that it will only call and text when you ask it to? If they wanted to rack up charges on your phone bill by making unauthorized calls and text's, it's not like they'd put that in the terms of use. Do you really need them to clarify it?

      "Note: This application will make phone calls and send SMS messages to premium phone numbers. This will cause your phone bill to skyrocket and will give us millions of dollars of extra revenue. All your base are belong to us."

    12. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      DIRECTLY CALL PHONE NUMBERS

      1. Purchase pay-to-call and pay-to-sms services 2. Stand on street corner with megaphone yelling out instructions for phones to dial and message my numbers 3. Profit!

      In fact you could just buy ads during popular TV shows that clearly speak the same instructions...

      Hey, keep that on the down low.

    13. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Zerth · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you give permission to text or call to an app, you don't get to choose to let it do so only when you mean it. Android phones don't come with fMRI or MEG to know your intentions.

      Yet.

    14. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, and though I love Siri, it would be easy to be the victim of a prank. One of my coworkers used Siri to text my boss the word 'buttface', even though the phone was locked. I can set it to require unlock, and I may have to, but it does affect the usefulness of Siri.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    15. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont you have to press a button to activate the listening?

    16. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 2

      In fact you could just buy ads during popular TV shows that clearly speak the same instructions...

      Or put it in a YouTube video and then Rickroll as many people as possible.

    17. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      MRI? iPhones will pop a confirmation asking if you want to dial a number when you initiate a call from outside the dialer. I think that's a potentially reasonable compromise somewhere between nothing and mind reading.

    18. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Note: This application will make phone calls and send SMS messages to premium phone numbers. This will cause your phone bill to skyrocket and will give us millions of dollars of extra revenue."

      I believe that app is called "teenager"...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    19. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd assume it just means that you use your voice to command the app to make the call, it asks if that's what you meant, and then you just tell the app yes. So it doesn't require you to make any confirmations outside of the app itself. Though I don't have it, so I could be wrong.

    20. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2
      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    21. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they wanted to rack up charges on your phone bill by making unauthorized calls and text's, it's not like they'd put that in the terms of use.

      That app is so invasive that it even managed to usurp your Slashdot account while you were typing and slip a completely superfluous, meaningless apostrophe into your use of the word "texts." These new apps are really insidious.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    22. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by serber · · Score: 2

      Unless this has changed in recent APIs, no it doesn't - the web browser does, but otherwise if you open the url "tel:somenumber" it will just start dialing.

      I never tried, but assume if you tried to submit an app that wasn't, say, an address book, it would get rejected if their wasn't a prompt first. Certainly if I'd published an app that did that I would have had a prompt.

      --
      Sometimes bad things happen.
    23. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obviously, it is the latter. The System that enforces those permissions cannot tell the difference between your two scenarios, as unlike iOS devices, Android devices are not blessed with mindreading capabilities by their almighty creator.

    24. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by jrumney · · Score: 2

      I can set it to require unlock, and I may have to, but it does affect the usefulness of Siri.

      This isn't really a problem on Android devices, where automation applications such as Llama, Locale or Tasker can disable the lock screen when you are in a scenario (which could be location, time, Bluetooth connection, calendar event....) where you need the voice control.

    25. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

      Not really ok. Iris is like an updated version of Eliza with reverse Tourette's where it occasionally spits out a random nugget of information that almost has something to do with your inquiry.

      "Where can I get good Italian food?"
      "The best Italian food near is Palermo No 2...Covina, CA."

      Yeah, thanks. That's 3 hours away if I don't hit traffic. Maybe something a smidge closer.

      The usual response is something along the lines of:

      "That's not something I get asked all the time."
      "You tell me."
      "What's your sign?"

    26. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by LordSnooty · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Hold your phone to the screen and play the Youtube video to install our great new anti-virus app..."

    27. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The apostrophe indicates the omission of " message", i.e. "text's" is short for "text messages".

    28. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      Yeah, OK. You keep telling yourself that.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    29. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Mithent · · Score: 1

      I found SpeakToIt Assistant to work fairly well - when the voice recognition worked. Maybe it was my British accent, but Google's voice recognition seems to be rather hit and miss to me.

    30. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      reverse Tourette's

      My cousin had that. He just walked around all day being quiet.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    31. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Text my boss, "buttface," authorization: Picard-alpha-ten.

    32. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by iapetus · · Score: 2

      'Mindreading' isn't really the right word for the discovery that what the device does is what you wanted it to do - and if it isn't what you [b]thought[/b] you wanted to do, then you were wrong.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    33. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There already is Iris Zero! :)

    34. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Iris" is being worked on by another company as a siri for android, so the only way Google would have Iris is to purchase that company or the rights to the name.

    35. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by DangerOnTheRanger · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there. Very clever indeed, sir. :)

    36. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      My old Razr had speech recognition ten years ago. My newer phone has it, but I never used it until the screen broke so I can't look numbers up. It's maddening.

      "Please say a command."

      "Call 'Kathy'."

      "Did you say 'call Shorty'?"

      "No, Kathy!"

      "Did you say 'call Barry'?"

      "No, god damn it!"

      "Did you say 'call Darryl'?"

      I found when it does this, it's just better to hit the red button and try again. Worse was before the screen broke, it's a flip phone so I won't butt dial, but the "say a command" button on the phone is on the outside. So I shut the ringer off for church, and the damned phone yells out "Please say a command" in church because there's no way to shut the feature off without shutting the phone off, and when the phone's off there's no way to tell if someone's called unless they leave a message. God damned phone!

    37. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Flyerman · · Score: 1

      I had a phone like that. The only setting change you make for that damned voice recognition was to either have it work off the button or have it work off the button and screen open.

      For a brief moment I thought it would only work with the screen open and the button pressed.

      They probably should have used "or" instead of "and."

    38. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      phone yells out "Please say a command" in church

      Okay, there's got to be a better joke in there than "Thou shalt have no other gods before me," but that's all I could come up with.

    39. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      No, actually an apostrophe indicates ownership, i.e. "The text's letters made the messages."

      An apostrophe can also be used in shorthand typing, i.e. "Hello, ma'am. how's your day?"

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    40. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by porges · · Score: 1

      +1 Awesome/Troll!

    41. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like reverse Tourette's would be more like, randomly blurting out, in a soft pleasant voice, "please" , "thankyou" and "pardon me".

    42. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by treeves · · Score: 2

      "No, god damn it!"
      "God damned phone!"

      How about "Thou shalt not take the Lord's name in vain"?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    43. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      You win!

    44. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your coworker's jib: I like the cut of it.

    45. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      This phrase has always confused me.
      Why is it supposed to be easier to type an apostrophe in stead of a d?

      --
      -- no sig today
    46. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You, like most, misunderstand -- it isn't taking his name in vain, it's a prayer. "Please damn this intolerable situation" and "send this piece of shit phone to hell where it came from."

      An ex-girlfriend had the crazy idea that "God damn it" was damning God. I guess she can't tell the difference between a shit dog and dog shit.

    47. Re:SpeakToIt Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hold your phone up to the speakers. Duh.

  2. Old news by SoonerSkeene · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not only has this been out for approaching a week, but it's also far from a competitor. It uses the standard voice services to transcribe what you say, then 'helpfully' google it for you or open a webpage. It most certainly can't do what Siri does, even when it is (rarely) working. You can ask Siri where to get a sandwich. Asking Evi just results in the homepage for UrbanSpoon.com launching. Not even a search for what you want. When's that Majel thing coming?

    1. Re:Old news by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I love all the hate about how its broken it isnt working all the time.... remember when siri came out it was the SAME problem???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Old news by SoonerSkeene · · Score: 2

      I don't mind that it's having trouble scaling to demand, but even if it was fully functional it still wouldn't be a Siri competitor any more than my thumbs are because they can type a URL. I want to be able to add something to my calendar, or ask where the closet X is.

    3. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, nope. been using mine since the day it came out, only times it doesn't work is when I'm driving through the sticks, and that only when I'm north west of town

    4. Re:Old news by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      my sister had a 4s on release day eventhough i stick with droid myself and she was complaining about timeouts and other glitches for quite a few days when it came out

      sure we all wanna be able to have it update calendars and other things. After playing with a few different programs lately im pretty impressed with iris, in alpha it seems to do 90% of what siri can do right now

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    5. Re:Old news by narcc · · Score: 5, Informative

      I want to be able to add something to my calendar, or ask where the closet X is.

      What's so strange is that the things people bring up when they talk about Siri are the same things that other apps have been able to do for ages.

      When Siri came out, there was a user here bragging that he could tell Siri that he was "hungry for Mexican food" and it would bring up a list of Mexican restaurants in his area. Well, I press the convenience key on my Blackberry and, surprise surprise, saying "I'm hungry for Mexican food" was all it took for Vlingo to pull up a list of Mexican restaraunts near me (grabbing my current location with the GPS) complete with a button to call them and a button to get directions.

      I'm still not sure what Siri does that's particularly special, though I do hear a lot about the things that Siri won't do that other similar apps can do.

    6. Re:Old news by SoonerSkeene · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's great thing that I like about Vlingo as well. The only reason I have my default action still on the Google Search voice thing is that it can do a select few things that Vlingo can't, which I use more often. Vlingo is far more full featured than this Evi thing.

      I agree about a lot of "been done before" stuff. Heck, my old Windows Mobile 5.x phone going on 8 years ago was able to use voice to "Play X artist" or "What's my next appointment" (still can't do that on Android),... and WinMo didn't even require a server connection to understand my request.

    7. Re:Old news by artor3 · · Score: 1

      What makes that different from the built-in Android voice search? I can already search Google, text/call/email people, play music, get directions, set alarms, etc... through voice commands. The only thing that makes Siri interesting (aside from talking back to you, which is more of a gimmick) is that it can do more context sensitive searches, as with your "Where can I get a sandwich?" example. If Evi doesn't do those, then it doesn't sound like it's doing anything that a default Android install doesn't do.

    8. Re:Old news by SoonerSkeene · · Score: 1

      Agree. Most of it is the cool factor. I honestly can't off the top of my head think of anything Siri does that I can't with default voice search beyond querying/adding calendar events. Asking questions gives me results with Google, and if really wanted to have those read back to me I could use Vlingo. I can't ask "where can I get a sandwich", but I can tell Google Voice Search "nearby restaurants" and it gives me a map with pushpins marking them. That's honestly better than Siri to me.

    9. Re:Old news by msauve · · Score: 1

      "aside from talking back to you, which is more of a gimmick"

      How do you figure? That seems like it would be particularly useful if one were using their phone via a Bluetooth audio connection (e.g. handsfree in a car). I have no idea how well Siri works in that sort of situation, but audio feedback would be on the requirements list.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re:Old news by Solandri · · Score: 1

      it's also far from a competitor. It uses the standard voice services to transcribe what you say, then 'helpfully' google it for you or open a webpage.

      Someone needs to hook up one of these things to IBM's Watson instead of Google or Wolfram Alpha.

      Just be sure to phrase your question in the form of an answer.

    11. Re:Old news by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      Well, it has a name that is almost the same as Siri. That makes it a thousand times better! /sarcasm

    12. Re:Old news by qualityassurancedept · · Score: 1

      Its only a matter of time before all these interactive phone voices get hijacked by commercials and say "Before I answer you question, did you know that you get a free cup of coffee with every McGriddles purchase today... now, the closest Hair Salon is..."

      --
      if your life is such a big joke then why should I care?
    13. Re:Old news by HyperQuantum · · Score: 1

      When's that Majel thing coming?

      Not for quite some time if you ask me, because it would require a truly 'intelligent' computer. Something that maybe even cannot be called a 'computer' anymore.

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    14. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You're using a blackberry. Your argument isirrewvay. Come back and comment when you have SMART PHONE.

    15. Re:Old news by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You seem to be describing Google Voice Search several years ago. The current Voice Search and Evi are much, much more than that. Have you even tried them?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Old news by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I'm still not sure what Siri does that's particularly special"

      It doesn't.

      More telling is Googling for things Siri can't answer, for which there are thousands of results. When you start to see what it can't do you begin to realise that it's really little more than voice-to-text, passed over to a search engine, with a few key words and terms mapped to local applications like "weather", "calendar", "appointment" and so on.

      Just like any other search engine out there, there are a lot of questions it really struggles with when posed in natural language form.

    17. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You nerds still just don't get it.

      Oh, well.

    18. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an HTC Evo and make extensive use of Google Voice search, I love it. Evi was a disappointment though because, for example, asking where I can get a sandwich just loads the homepage of urbanspoon.com, it didn't even bother opening a search for my location or even restaurants, just the default homepage of the website. At least Google Voice Search does something useful.

    19. Re:Old news by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Siri isn't quite there yet.

      One thing that really is useful is that you can control the phone's features themselves by voice and that part of Siri is pretty seamless. "Call mom". "Read me that text message". "Set alarm for 7:00 am". You can also dictate things you'd normally have to type and it works pretty well.

      As far as the commercials go, asking Siri general knowledge questions... it's not there yet. "Where is the closest Thai restaurant?" works well, things that require interpretation don't really work well.

      For me, Siri is best to control the phone, not to seek information from the web.

    20. Re:Old news by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Having used both, I think Siri works much, much better at controlling the phone.

    21. Re:Old news by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      It's just not the same since you can't actually get Majel Barrett to do the voice. Having my phone sound exactly like the computer from Star Trek would've been just too awesome.

    22. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still not sure what Siri does that's particularly special, though I do hear a lot about the things that Siri won't do that other similar apps can do.

      I don't know what Vlingo can do, but here are just two things that impressed me with Siri:

      1. "Call my wife on her work phone". - Did exactly that (including differentiating between multiple phone numbers).
      2. "How old was Shakespeare when he died". - Produced a correct Wolfram|Alpha generated result. Didn't have to go through search results or anything else.

      I would expect most phones to do the first. A Wolfram|Alpha app should do the second, although it wouldn't necessarily have the benefit of voice-dictation.
      Having both available via a single voice interface: very useful.

    23. Re:Old news by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yep, this is where Siri is strong - not in that it's some major advance in AI as some Apple fanboys claim, but that it's well integrated into the OS so that the things that are linked to phone functions, are linked in a nice seamless manner.

    24. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right.

      "Siri, call 555-1234".
      "Joe, I'm not sure what you want."
      "Siri, please turn off the radio."
      "Joe, I'm sorry but I can't do that."
      "Siri, how do I drive to Paris?"
      "Joe, I am sorry but I cannot search for locations in France."

      Well integrated? Nah.

    25. Re:Old news by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      It seems like the did some targeted development work on things that appear in the ads. You can ask basic questions in complex working, like specific facts about the weather report, and Siri will parse appropriately.

      You can ask joke kinds of questions, and Siri often has a clever reply. I asked once "What do you think of Android" and Siri said "I think differently." But you can't yet ask questions like, "Who was the super bowl MVP in 1982?" and get an answer without Siri saying LMGTFY. That kind of functionality would be awesome, but it's not there yet.

  3. Siri on other iDevices by sonicmerlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the real reason Siri's available only for 4S users. Apple added 37 million new iPhone customers last quarter, with the vast majority of those buying 4S's. It's actually pretty amazing they've been able to keep up with the computational and server requirements of all those Siri users with hardly any major hiccups. I've heard of maybe 2 significant Siri outages, and those lasted for very short periods of time. People wanting Apple to extend Siri to all 200 million+ iOS users are being unrealistic. There's no way to handle that kind of load all at once.

    1. Re:Siri on other iDevices by afabbro · · Score: 1

      Sure there is - buy more servers and bandwidth.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    2. Re:Siri on other iDevices by mattventura · · Score: 1

      But that would cost them money. Instead, they could just use Siri as an incentive to upgrade to the 4S.

    3. Re:Siri on other iDevices by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many servers? How much bandwidth?

      Not even WOW was originally released every where at the same time to adjust to load.

      The fact is until you get hard numbers you can't take it for granted exactly how much you need.

      Apple added 37 million 4S users in the last quarter. did you know in October how many iphones they would sell?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Siri on other iDevices by silverhalide · · Score: 1

      You have a long career ahead of you as a tech sector executive.

    5. Re:Siri on other iDevices by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll do that over time but it seems pretty smart to start "small" ramping Siri-users into the millions as iPhone4S's were sold instead of immediately serving hundreds of millions of users by issuing Siri in an OS update. And there's no way the Evi people could have done the same kind of ramp up without resorting to invites or a similar system.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    6. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 2

      Not even SWTOR launched all at once. They let in pre-orders early and staggered those in to avoid a server data flood.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    7. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are physical devices, so they know they can't sell more than they have made.

    8. Re:Siri on other iDevices by afabbro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have a long career ahead of you as a tech sector executive.

      (shrug) Whatever - it really is the answer. One Siri-enabled device takes X CPU power, X bandwidth, etc. There is some internal database scaling, but I doubt the Siri database is huge. Most likely, they have a bajillion x86-class boxes each with a full copy of the database. Every X many Siri devices requires Y many servers.

      Somewhere, there's a monitor that reports overall usage. As they get towards the redline, they add more. This kind of scaling is very easy. If they had to present a single consistent copy of data (e.g., credit card processing or something), it would be a lot more difficult.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    9. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but see that only works so many times. Even Apple users aren't dumb. When they hear that hackers got it working find on the iPhone 4, then they know it was disabled on purpose. Even people who like to have the shiniest new stuff don't like to be forced to buy it through tricks. If you bought a car, and found out that it had a disabled turbocharger in it that you couldn't enable, would you buy another one from the same company? In MBA speak, we may call it "Value Added Marketing" (or "Price discrimination"), but purposely neutering a product so you can sell another one is called something else in the real world: being an ass-hat.

      I bought an iPhone 4, but I won't be buying the 4S, and probably not any future model either. I've already switched most of my day-to-day use to android, because IP-Phones and a lot of other features just tend to work a lot better. I could give a crap about Siri, but I don't like to see a top-of-the-line product that's less than a year old purposely phased out because... yeah because of nothing, really.

    10. Re:Siri on other iDevices by mattventura · · Score: 1

      The "purposely neutering a product" is something that pretty much every CPU and Video card manufacturer does. And besides, choosing not to support something on an old phone isn't neutering it, it's just them not providing a particular feature, just like how they never brought multitasking to the original iPhone even though it was possible through jailbreaking.

    11. Re:Siri on other iDevices by MikeMo · · Score: 2

      Did you know they spent more than $1 BILLION on that server farm in North Carolina? And they're getting ready to double it's capacity? And it took them almost two years to bring it on line. You can't just roll into Best Buy, buy some stuff, turn it on and be all set.

    12. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Nursie · · Score: 1

      The "purposely neutering a product" is something that pretty much every CPU and Video card manufacturer does.

      Having read about the last couple of generations of nVidia cards - not so much any more. They all use different processors, not neutered variants of the same one like they used to.

    13. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.. it really isn't the answer. Because "the answer" will include reasonably accurate usage estimates and specific amounts of server hardware for some time period into the future. Not some pseudo algebra and "MOAR STUFFZ GUD!"

      The first problem with getting usage estimates in this case ... none of the people you're trying to estimate the usage of .. are users yet. And scrutinizing the data of the first adopters isn't terribly useful because first adopters are likely to be the heaviest users, as a segment.

      Even when scaling is "easy" you still need to know how much you need to scale. Which is still hard.

    14. Re:Siri on other iDevices by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Ehhh... what?/

      Explain 550/560 Ti vs. 550/560 *not* Ti, then...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Siri on other iDevices by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      How many servers? How much bandwidth?

      The iCloud is built on top of Azure's CDN and Amazon's S3 storage service.

      The fact is until you get hard numbers you can't take it for granted exactly how much you need.

      That's the entire point of using two cloud services with more capacity than your own, along with an elastic pricing model.

    16. Re:Siri on other iDevices by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The real question is.. why do they need *any* servers to enable siri? iPhone 4S ought to be more than capable of handling a huge vocabulary on it's own power. I mean, I had a flip-phone in 2003 that could do voice-dialing from the phonebook without training, surely a smartphone should be capable of far, far, more without calling home for help...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    17. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's slow as shit on iPhone 4 though. Almost unusably slow.

    18. Re:Siri on other iDevices by lclemis · · Score: 1

      So they can sell ads (monetize) on Siri. Really that simple. One day you will be able to ask Siri to give you an insurance quote from All State. Or ask Siri to upgrade your internet connection or order more Apple TV episodes. Of course All State will pay for this privilege as will your internet provider etc. Apple wants to be able to upgrade and add these features on the fly.

      Also, I willing to be that Siri is going to end up in a lot more stuff than your phone. Your computer, alarm clock, car, watch etc will all have Siri functionality and they will all "know you" and communicate with you in a consistent fashion because it's all run off apples servers.

    19. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, Siri's first version as it was initially rolled out may fit on your phone. The the whole point of Siri however (as opposed to what's already out there) is to be able to extend and improve it to the point where it understands anything relevant in any of the supported languages AND act on it appropriately. That's quite an undertaking of which we're only seeing the first baby steps. Apple buying Siri and integrating it into iOS is not just their answer to simple voice controls - it's the start of a race that will cause significant improvements in voice recognition (and understanding!) across all platforms.

    20. Re:Siri on other iDevices by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but see that only works so many times. Even Apple users aren't dumb.

      Wrong. They are.

      ...called something else in the real world: being an ass-hat.

      Correct. Apple are ass-hats.

    21. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Strykar · · Score: 1

      Insightful? How? You can scale, the issue is cost.

    22. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple added 37 million 4S users in the last quarter.

      Not that it really matters, as your point is still valid, but Apple sold 37 million total phones. Not all of them were 4S's.

    23. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How insightful.

    24. Re:Siri on other iDevices by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but see that only works so many times. Even Apple users aren't dumb.

      Sorry, but that's incorrect. I'm not trying to troll here, it's just that Apple does have the ability of selling vastly overpriced items, meaning their customers aren't that big on gauging their options. While I'll admit that Apple has solid, useful products and that they are just what some users need (not every Apple customer is a moron - some actually make a very informed decision to pay extra for the added convenience they get), mostly they sell their devices because they are shiny and fashionable. An interesting case study, the iPhone 4S, contract-free, where I live, costs about $900 if you purchase it from a carrier, but it costs about $1500 on an Apple Store. First of all, they are both obviously overpriced, but eletronics here are all incredibly expensive (A Galaxy Tab 10.1 costs the same $900, for comparison, and an i3-2100 retails for $180) and that's not the point. The point is people buy them. A lot. Sometimes from an Apple Store, which is bordering Gary Busey on a scale of craziness, but that isn't even the worst part. Now, about 50% of these buyers have pre-paid plans. The ones that give you no discount on your phone purchase and are actually more expensive per call minute/Mb, but have the advantage of not forcing a quota on you, which is only advantageous if you use your phone very little. Think about that for a second. They'll gladly spend $900 on a device they'll mostly use as a dumb phone. A very pretty dumb phone that they'll rarely use. Because as with all things fashion, the iPhone is a status symbol more than anything, and your need for its features are a secondary concern. They are first jewelry, second toys, and useful products in a distant third.

      So Apple can release the iPhone 4 again, unchanged except for a cosmetic detail, and the thing will sell like hotcakes. Because, in general, customers are borderline retarted. Theirs are doubly so.

    25. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that the iPhone 4S is just the iPhone 4 that's "unchanged except for a cometic detail," you are the biggest idiot of them all. It's the cosmetics that DIDN'T change between the models. They look identical, but there are serious differences inside. Of course, you wouldn't be interested in such technical details, because your only concern is attacking people whose needs and interests differ from your own. You're the moron.

    26. Re:Siri on other iDevices by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 2

      An iPhone is the same as a luxury car: a status symbol. You do not you think that a million dollars car costs all of this to produce, right? And yet people buy these expensive/exclusive cars, to show they are "more important" than others.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    27. Re:Siri on other iDevices by risinganger · · Score: 1
      I have to disagree and I'll use the 3GS as my example. It came out in June 2009 with iOS 3.0 and it's still being supported in 2012 with iOS 5.0.1. Yes it doesn't have a few features supported, some of which will be, in Apple's mind, to help distinguish products but for the most part shares all the improvements made over two major version updates.

      Now take a look at Android handsets. Not Android but the manufacturers that use it. They all have varying support for the latest version of Android with some shipping older versions months after a newer one has been released and many simply not offering updates. I fully admit this isn't up-to-date but here's what I read some time ago (link).

      Most manufacturers are sucky in some shape or form, personally I find Apple pretty decent and from my direct experiences better than Nokia and LG.

    28. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Actually, having now looked at the info on wikipedia, you're right. There are certainly a greater array of different GPUs, but they still use the same one across a couple of models with various features locked or turned down.

      It would have been more correct on my part to say they do it less than they did a few years ago, perhaps.

      I remember when the difference between the top of the line and the mid range was locked cores/pipelines and a few MHz, unlockable at your own risk if you wanted to see if the dormant hardware had fab errors or was just locked...

    29. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Siri's actually powered by a call center in India

      (really, I hope not!)

    30. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is.. why do they need *any* servers to enable siri? iPhone 4S ought to be more than capable of handling a huge vocabulary on it's own power. I mean, I had a flip-phone in 2003 that could do voice-dialing from the phonebook without training, surely a smartphone should be capable of far, far, more without calling home for help...

      Officially, Siri is still "in beta." (In this case, it's Google's definition of Beta) Meaning they're still constantly tweaking and updating the natural-language parsing routines based on usage data. Having Siri call home each time gives them a treasure trove of usage data that would be much more difficult to gather if they had to plead with users to upload statistics. (They could, of course, make the statistics upload automatic, but then people would complain about how Apple was secretly spying on them...instead, Apple is openly spying on them, so nobody complains!)

    31. Re:Siri on other iDevices by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      The "purposely neutering a product" is something that pretty much every CPU and Video card manufacturer does. And besides, choosing not to support something on an old phone isn't neutering it, it's just them not providing a particular feature, just like how they never brought multitasking to the original iPhone even though it was possible through jailbreaking.

      As many others pointed out, silicon production techniques that result in the same part being used multiple places has been going on for about 20 years (the 486 SX/DX being the first noteworthy consumer application.) It's done so that silicon that does not pass all of the tests can still be used in a downgrade version. The odds that the test process is overly rigorous (or that production metrics warrant downgrading) are shaky, so they *might* get a card that is really fully prepared to work harder than the model spec, but it is basically playing the lottery.

    32. Re:Siri on other iDevices by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Quiet, neckbeard.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    33. Re:Siri on other iDevices by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      You've completely lost the entire scheme of things, if you think that's the reason.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    34. Re:Siri on other iDevices by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      On purely technological grounds, I'd want to make the decision based on battery life -- if it takes less battery power to upload the audio and download a response, then do it online; if it takes less battery life to do the voice-recognition and database lookup on the phone, then do it on the phone.

    35. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone = luxury like toyota = luxury %iPhone users in smarthphone users>%toyota users in car users

    36. Re:Siri on other iDevices by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      This is the real reason Siri's available only for 4S users.

      I don't think so, I think it's because of Checkov in the last Star Trek movie.

      "Please enter authorization code."
      "Wictor wictor alpha"
      "That code is not recognized."

      There was a British woman on TV a few weeks ago who was saying that Siri couldn't understand a word she said. And she's speaking the same language but with a slightly different accent! I'll bet Texans and Bostonians have trouble with it, too. Hell, I can't understand a word someone from Boston says.

      "Please enter authorizatiopn"
      "Victah Victah alpha"
      "That code is not recognized."

      Or New Yawk. "Da dwag! Da dyam Dwag is undah da cwah! Ya pahkin' da cah on da dyam dwag!"

    37. Re:Siri on other iDevices by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I do not try to argue with Apple fanboys. (Why I believe you're a fanboy? Because if not, would have understood)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    38. Re:Siri on other iDevices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go suck some cocks in the Castro, Apple fag.

  4. Not a real competitor to Siri by A12m0v · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Putting all of Siri's capabilities that Evi can't match aside, we still got something that isn't built into the OS like Siri is. I don't see a reason to use this versus Siri unless you are on Android or an older iPhone.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do you consider that a good thing? Are you a big Internet Explorer fan? I'd much rather have functionality independently selectable so that I can choose which I want, and upgrade it (or not) as I choose.

    2. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or a Hipster.

      "Yes, I use an Apple device. Yes, I have Siri. But, I don't want to be that tethered to Apple."

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    3. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IE9 is a pretty nice browser for casuals. The same as Siri -- the majority of users will never need more.

    4. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by hawguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Putting all of Siri's capabilities that Evi can't match aside, we still got something that isn't built into the OS like Siri is. I don't see a reason to use this versus Siri unless you are on Android or an older iPhone.

      Is that really a factor in evaluating the app? If this app works better than Siri, will you refuse to run it because it's not built-in to the OS? Obviously if it's not better than Siri then there's no reason to switch from Siri.

    5. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by SoonerSkeene · · Score: 1

      I'd love something as seamless as Siri. No option exists on android for querying/adding calendar appointments, and I'd find more practical use for that than most of the things Siri does. All in all though, the Google Voice Actions (is that the real name?) seem to do okay for me. Sure I can't say "where can I get some coffee?" with perfect results, but saying "Nearest coffee shop" works okay for me.

    6. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by catbutt · · Score: 2

      Even if it isn't a competitor now, it could certainly become one. "Built into the OS" isn't so much a good thing, although having access to everything it needs, is. If this service can do the hard part, it isn't that big a deal for Android to add API's to allow apps like this to work as seamlessly as Siri.

    7. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows mobile has had voice command for YEARS. I used it all the time before I purchased an iPhone. Unlike Siri windows mobile voice command can start programs and interact with the software on my phone. Try telling Siri to play "solitaire". Apple still has a lot of work to do to improve Siri. I look forward to do things with the phone other than play music.

    8. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No option exists on android for querying/adding calendar appointments

      A couple of months back I was playing with three or four android siri competator apps on Android and one or two of them definately created alarms and calender events without issue. But having read your statement, I do not recall asking to check on calendar appointments. Regardless, at least half of your statement is incorrect.

    9. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows mobile has had voice command for YEARS. I used it all the time before I purchased an iPhone. Unlike Siri windows mobile voice command can start programs and interact with the software on my phone. Try telling Siri to play "solitaire". Apple still has a lot of work to do to improve Siri. I look forward to do things with the phone other than play music.

      Siri was just an app Apple bought from a minor app developer last year, for $150m (pocket change in this league), and it was a cool app but not offering that much more than as you say others have had for long. After Apple bought the app and re-branded it as their own innovation, people suddenly started perceiving it as so far ahead of anyone else working on "AI" (sic) and voice control that it impossible to catch up with, which is so ridiculous that it isn't even funny. It still is a cool app/functionality, but nothing close to what is being made up to be.

    10. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't a hipster care more about brand labeling than functionality? Or is hipster just another word we can tack on to people who do things we don't like?

    11. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Frangible · · Score: 4, Informative

      ... and by "minor app developer" you mean a Stanford Research Institute spinoff, where it was created from over 10 years of AI research by DARPA on the CALO/PAL projects, which were in fact the largest AI projects in history?

      You might remember DARPA from some of their other projects. Like ARPANET amongst others.

      If you expect to equal 10 years of DARPA AI research and development in a 3-week coding project, well good luck with that.

    12. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      I do it all the time with jeannie.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    13. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So after SMSes degenerated people's writing style, we now have voice recognition spoil our vocal expression skills. Let alone the fact that this makes people dumber for other reasons.

      I, for one, totally don't get how you can be up in arms about sending your voice patterns into a gigantic data processing farm just to have your ass wiped for you.

      Idiocracy is real.

      At least I can take comfort in the fact that all the hipster morons won't survive more than a week when they are on their own for whatever reason.

    14. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      When you say "built into the OS", isnt Siri a service offered by a third party company?

    15. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by rsborg · · Score: 2

      Why do you consider that a good thing? Are you a big Internet Explorer fan? I'd much rather have functionality independently selectable so that I can choose which I want, and upgrade it (or not) as I choose.

      As despicable as Microsoft was, if you were on the web back in 1999, you'd realize that IE4 and IE5 were *considerably* more capable than Netscape was at the time (this is before Mozilla). So yes, there is a period where IE did have lots of fans.

      I pretty much lived off Internet Explorer until Firefox (nee Firebird) came by and saved my soul (which I've used almost exclusively until Chrome came around).

      Perhaps Apple's integrated (closed) model will be defeated by Google, but in the interim, show me a different voice control app that allows me to say the following "Remind me to call Chase bank at 18005243880 tomorrow morning when I leave the house" and have it *actually do that*.. this is the exact wording I used last night and it got it perfectly, and the reminder triggered on morning commute.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    16. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use something like A.L.I.C.E., which would be much better suited for the purpose anyways.

    17. Re:Not a real competitor to Siri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and by "minor app developer" you mean a Stanford Research Institute spinoff, where it was created from over 10 years of AI research by DARPA on the CALO/PAL projects, which were in fact the largest AI projects in history? You might remember DARPA from some of their other projects. Like ARPANET amongst others. If you expect to equal 10 years of DARPA AI research and development in a 3-week coding project, well good luck with that.

      By minor app developer I was referring more to the fact that others than Apple could easily have bought it as well ($150m is pocket change), if they found it that revolutionary. It is cool technology, implementation and marketing, but not that far off what others have that people are making it out to be.

      The decades of world leading research into "AI", voice/natural language processing, machine learning and natural user interfaces from the likes of IBM, Microsoft Research and more recently Google, and others, is hardly a 3-week coding project. But if that is how you'd like to think the technology behind Siri stack up to what others have, be my guest.

  5. Good product by hugh+nicks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had told my friend about this after reading an article about it. He managed to grab it on his EVO 3D after I told him that Evi's server's seem to be melting, but he said it worked really really well. He recently sent me an email saying that the server's are not melted, but burnt to a crisp. He is no longer getting data from Evi. He knows it's in beta still, but I don't think anyone expected this kind of response. Once they shore up their servers, this app promises to very extremely interesting.

    1. Re:Good product by hugh+nicks · · Score: 2

      I meant extremely interesting, not very extremely interesting. :D

    2. Re:Good product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The server's what? You keep using a possessive form of the word "server" without telling us what it possesses.

  6. still waiting for the right voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm thinking "Gay Deceiver" would be quite sultry and appealing.

    1. Re:still waiting for the right voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know it is rather pitiful how few people will get that reference.

  7. Should have been called "Envi" by readandburn · · Score: 1

    Hilarity!

    1. Re:Should have been called "Envi" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Exelis Visual Information Solutions would have sued their pants off.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Should have been called "Envi" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I thought this was Google's answer to Siri at first, and Evi sounded appropriate... just short of EviL.

  8. Competitor to Siri? That is funny ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As many are finding out .... Evi is nothing but a bad copycat FAKING functionality.

    Has anybody actually manage to get a real answer from the Evi?

  9. In IRC... by bmo · · Score: 2

    we have Macbot.

    Macbot is like Siri, but retarded, drunk, and insane.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:In IRC... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Sounds like IRC to me.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  10. Odd pricing strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you give it away on the platform with no competition but charge on the platform with a free alternative? That seems precisely backwards.

    1. Re:Odd pricing strategy by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Why would you give it away on the platform with no competition but charge on the platform with a free alternative? That seems precisely backwards.

      Because you can?

      Don't google already get a licensing fee when a manufacturer puts Android on a phone?

    2. Re:Odd pricing strategy by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Why would you give it away on the platform with no competition but charge on the platform with a free alternative? That seems precisely backwards.

      Because you can?

      Don't google already get a licensing fee when a manufacturer puts Android on a phone?

      um, no.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  11. And who gets the records? by phorm · · Score: 1

    And since Siri and friends all need to go to "the cloud" to get the horsepower for translating whatever you ask... what are the privacy and recording implications of that?
    I'd imagine that they would need to keep some form of records for tuning, so how much do they keep, for how long, and under what assurances of privacy?

  12. Just tried it by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just grabbed it from Android market. Tried 3 searches:
    1. "Petrol near me" - success - found a petrol station near by, correctly.
    2. "Weather today" - failure - said weather coming soon, in the meantime, try accuWeather.
    3. "Who is the Prime Minister of Australia" - success - Julia Gillard.


    The speech to text was flawless, even on the 3rd one.

    Still a gimmick I can't see any real use for. I can Google Voice search on my phone already and I never use it. Maybe there's something else you can do with these things I haven't thought of but for me it seems like Siri it pointless and Evi more so.

    1. Re:Just tried it by azbot · · Score: 1

      I agree, the voice recognition is far superior to the default android system. It's quite possible that Evi has decent i18n, where as the android sytem currently only caters for american-like accents.

    2. Re:Just tried it by CyranoDeBergerac · · Score: 2

      3. "Who is the Prime Minister of Australia" - failure - Julia Gillard.

      FTFY

    3. Re:Just tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      3. "Who is the failure of Australia" - Prime Minister - Julia Gillard.
      FTFY properly

    4. Re:Just tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weather today" - failure - said weather coming soon, in the meantime, try accuWeather

      Holy shit, it knows weather is coming soon?! Why aren't the programmers advertising its psychic abilities?! :p

    5. Re:Just tried it by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 2

      And I've now uninstalled it because it wreaked havoc on my phone. Every time I got in my car, it took over the bluetooth to "phone audio" instead of the car kit and it keeps on opening itself, even after I kill it.

    6. Re:Just tried it by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Ask it where you can find 'dead nigger storage'.

      I'm not sure, but I have it on good authority that there's no sign out front to that effect.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Just tried it by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Because those programmers are currently under contract to the IPCC...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  13. Vlingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to point out that Vlingo has been out much longer than Siri and is a pretty good alternative on the Android platform (its not as good on the Apple platform). Vlingo is free. I am not sure why people never mention it in these discussions.

    1. Re:Vlingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure why people never mention it in these discussions.

      Perhaps because it has the dumbest name.

    2. Re:Vlingo by c0lo · · Score: 1

      I am not sure why people never mention it in these discussions.

      Perhaps because it has the dumbest name.

      Cant be much dumber than Evil... errr... I mean Evi.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  14. tfa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, did anyone else read TFA's title as "Evil Overlord"?

  15. Overloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or overlooked?

  16. So basically it is another crappy rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siri is like the Beatles, and Evi is like a Monkees cover band.

    1. Re:So basically it is another crappy rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ok, because The Beatles sucked.

    2. Re:So basically it is another crappy rip off by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      That's ok, because The Beatles sucked.

      And Head was the greatest movie of all time, right?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  17. In this case, Size Does Matter by guttentag · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the service is collapsing under the weight of the attention? At the end of the day, a serious Siri competitor can only come from a huge, very well-financed company because Apple sunk a ridiculous amount of money into a data center to support Siri. And they still have tens of billions of dollars in cash lying around. True Knowledge, the company that introduced Evi, has had about $5.2 million in announced financing over the last four years. This is like calling that guy selling strawberries on the street corner "Safeway's competition." He may have good strawberries, but he's not going to make a dent in Safeway's business. He simply couldn't handle that kind of volume. I know we've seen plenty of David and Goliath technology matchups that have been upended, but this technology is only made possible and sustainable by a huge investment. By the time that ceases to be true (when you can run Siri on your phone without reliance on the cloud) Apple will be even further ahead of the field.

    1. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by SoonerSkeene · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My old Windows Mobile 5.x phone going on 8 or 9 years ago was able to use voice to "Play X artist" or "What's my next appointment" (still can't do that on Android),... and WinMo didn't even require a server connection to translate my voice into text. It could even respond to you. Say "Play music", it would ask "what do you want to play? By album, artist, genre, or shuffle?" You could even continue the conversation, just like Siri, by saying "what artists are available?" or something similar.

      The only time a connection of any kind was required was if my request spawned a web search or geolocation process, which would be a normal webpage or map loading. I don't see why Apple needs "a huge data center" to handle these requests.

    2. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you are somewhat right here, but on the other hand, with things like Google App Engine and Amazon's cloud for rent (and force.com, etc.), anyone can have their own cloud which can scale to basically any size. Apple bought Siri, because they probably thought it had decent technology, but if another company creates better technology (i.e. faster or more flexible algorithms), they can buy the scalability. What they can't match Apple on, though, is they can't provide a service that costs them money for free to users, while subsidizing that cost with hardware sales.

    3. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by guttentag · · Score: 2
      My 1996 Performa 6360 (160 Mhz processor, 16Mb RAM) had "voice recognition" capabilities, but it was a limited set of commands the system had to listen for, and if you didn't enunciate the way the system expected, it wouldn't understand. The two big selling points for Siri are:
      1. Natural Speech Processing. You can speak naturally, and you can say just about anything, and Siri gets it. That is accomplished because there is a giant server farm processing the recorded sound file and interpreting it. Presumably, it learns and gets better because collectively it's hearing millions of different voices, speech patterns and requests every day. You couldn't do that on your phone. Your old Windows mobile required you to stick to a script, expected you to speak pre-defined commands and chose the command it thought you said. Steve Jobs was big on technology being intuitive. He believed that if people have to receive training to operate your device, you designed it wrong. This was the holy grail for him, because you talk to the machine the way you would talk to a person and it just works. And that's what the majority of non-technical people want.
      2. Intelligent Responses. Siri makes semi-intelligent guesses as to what you want, whether you're saying "Text mom this..." or "Where's a good place to hide a body?" In the former case, it takes dictation. In the latter, it suggests secluded places. It's far more complex than your old phone.
    4. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      "Where's a good place to hide a body?" is a great way to smoke androids without paradox protection, as it's essentially a variation on the "interesting number paradox"....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by pnot · · Score: 1

      This is like calling that guy selling strawberries on the street corner "Safeway's competition." He may have good strawberries, but he's not going to make a dent in Safeway's business. He simply couldn't handle that kind of volume.

      Sure, but -- to stretch your analogy a little -- if he gets enough people talking about his strawberries, he might get bought out by another huge business which wants to complete with Safeway, and which does have the resources to scale up whatever it is that makes his strawberries so good.

    6. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by makomk · · Score: 2

      Is there any evidence that Siri's supposed natural language processing is anything other than a larger and slightly fuzzier set of pre-defined commands, where it still can't understand anything except the commands it knows?

    7. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Well there are some things in WinMo of the old and also in old Nokia Phones which no smartphone yet has matched.
      The Nokia phones had excellent cameras with Carl Zeiss objective lenses and could make an alarm from the alarm clock even if the phone was turned off (sort of super standby)

      In case of Winmo, Android comes closest with its configurability, but WinMos downfall simply was its bugs. I once had a phone with version 6.1 or so, and that one had the shoddiest browser I have ever seen in my life (about five years into ie6) and could not even trigger an alarm correctly, by suddenly buzzing off at midnight although the alarm was set to 7. Add to that the ghastly usability and you have a stinker despite being very flexible under the hood.
      Over the years there were lots of excellent mobile osses (I once had a Zaurus), but in the late 90s Microsoft killed all of them with their market dominance. I am not to unhappy that Microsoft does not get too much foothold currently into the mobile space. They still have the shoddiest browser standardswise.

    8. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by Frangible · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, its all just a series of tubes but yes, it can adapt to understand semantics and "learn", though its target actions are something entirely different from language processing.

    9. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      My iPhone 3GS can do basic voice actions as well. Your anecdote is nothing new and one that everyone already knows about. You have never used Siri I can tell.

    10. Re:In this case, Size Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being hand-picked, fresh from the little field just down stream of that place where those guys make LSD, and occasionally have spills that get into the creek. That's pretty hard to scale up, even if it *does* make for a good repeat customer ratio.

  18. Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by joshamania · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really don't understand why folks are making a big stink about Siri and this other whoozitwhatsits. I imagine IBM hasn't made a smartphone app for Watson because it would need a huge computer/serverfarm/planet to run it for millions of users yet.

    Watson is the real deal. Siri, to me, seems like a search engine and nothing more. It's not answering questions...it's just giving normal people the ability to use Google like I use google...i.e. knowing the modifiers and using them.

    1. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      That's weird. Because when I ask Siri to set an alarm for 5:30 am, it sets an alarm for 5:30 am. But when I ask Google the same thing, I get back a bunch of links about Siri.

      How can I use google to set an alarm?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using your fingers on your google supplied operating system.

    3. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's certainly a waste of time.

      It's OK though Mr. Fanboi, you can keep running your spyware-riddled OS which is a cheap copy of the real deal.

    4. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by artor3 · · Score: 2

      You press the voice command key on your Android phone and say "Set alarm for 5:30 am". It responds with a few beeps instead of a computer generated voice, but it works.

    5. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by wanzeo · · Score: 2

      Nearly every technology that comes to mind follows the cycle.

      First, a non-consumer company or government does it as research.
      Second, a high end consumer company copies and sells it.
      Third, somebody gets around to creating an open source copy of the copy, and releases it for free.

      Of course, the first two projects will be closed from public view and start to stagnate, while the third will attract attention and eventually surpass the others in usefullness.

    6. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      Uhm... have you actually even used Siri?

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    7. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the irony of you calling GP a "fanboi" is absolutely delicious!

    8. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      Jeannie.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    9. Re:Um...hello Watson, could you come here... by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      The problem is Watson only provides questions, not answers. Putting it on people's phones would create a real-life version of those Bing commercials where everyone's walking arount quoting facts into their phones in hopes of getting the right question back out.

  19. Re:Competitor to Siri? That is funny ... by kaffiene · · Score: 1, Funny

    what is a fanboi?

  20. Observations by vencs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Speech Recognition is good. Many questions bumped back with server busy message - difference being it promises to respond when it is able to.
    - Call X: Server busy - Thought this is something it can fetch from phone more than from its server.
    - Email X: I do not know how to that yet. Ask me for any information.
    - Calendar: Online calendars are Google Calendar, Yahoo! Calendar, O2 Calendar. (Those are hyperlinked words which would take you to another Evi Screen with Visit buttons.)
    - Distance to Moon: May be you want something about the moon? Try this webpage Moon - Wikipedia. (Hyperlinked to Moon wiki page).
    - Stock price of Apple: Try Quote.com for stock
    - Height of Everest: Mount Everest's' elevation is 8850 meters, 29000 feet.

    - The long sorry message read out is not you would want to hear more than a couple of times in the that unattractive robotic tone.
    - It apparently depends on or uses a Text To Service other than the default one. And so the I selected (Pico TTS) is stopping if I am silent for more than 10s with out any audible warning. Which forces me to look whats happening and click on the listen button again.
    - One issue that arises with a non-inbuilt TTS is Evi is not in control of the entire end to end experience and can be messed up pretty easily due to the TTSs' clicks, timeouts, quality, capabilities.

    1. Re:Observations by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Here's the weird part about "call x"

      "Voice Command" on iPhones and iPod Touches can already do "call x" without touching any servers. According to the KB articles I've seen, if you disable siri, you can use the "standard" voice command on the 4S.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  21. Pricing seems wrong... by williamyf · · Score: 1

    So they charge 99 cents for iPhone users who, at least with the 4S have a superior (and free) alternative, but give it away for free on the android market?

    I think it should be the other way around... then again, I guess all those iPhone4 people want to talk to their phones, so that their cool friends think they have got a 4S ith Siri.....

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:Pricing seems wrong... by twistedcubic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They charge 99 cents for the iPhone because iPhone users are more likely to spend money. Siriously.

    2. Re:Pricing seems wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny enough WhatsApp only charges on iDevices too.

    3. Re:Pricing seems wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the majority of iOS users are on an iPhone 4S. It's also not unprecedented for a paid iOS app to be free on Android.

  22. Hours, not days by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Remember when siri came out it was the SAME problem???

    No, because it was up more than it was down. Siri since them has been keeping up. Apple fixed whatever load problem they were having more in terms of hours than days or weeks.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. Can someone please be ORIGINAL by katorga · · Score: 0

    Siri -> Evi. Please. Lets be a little more original than that. I'm so tired of the non-Apple market simply making cheap knock-offs. I wish someone would step out in front for once.

    1. Re:Can someone please be ORIGINAL by vencs · · Score: 1

      Now might not be a right time to stand out in front even if a product is good as Apple got its spot reserved in the peoples' minds (both sides alike). It looks like even if a startup or AMZN comes up with a cool product in related areas before Apple, people would wonder how fantastic Apples' counter would be. In fact, it feels reasonable when someone says "I am not buying a TV this time, want to see the (rumored) Apples iTV".

    2. Re:Can someone please be ORIGINAL by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      Right. Because Siri is completly original.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

  24. Gotta start somewhere by erick99 · · Score: 2

    The Android community will eventually get a Siri equivalent though I doubt Evi is it. But, the more iterations the better and we will eventually get there. I'm glad that there is active development.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  25. Google's respone by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    Don't be Evi?

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    1. Re:Google's respone by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Then who am I supposed to be?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Google's respone by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      That is for the zen part of your guru meditation to find out...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  26. really.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    once you get past the novelty, do you really find any of this voice recognition crap useful? I hate how clumsy and imprecise this sort of thing is, not to mention the insult of having to talk to an inanimate object. I'll keep with using my fingers for now...

    1. Re:really.. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Its VERY useful in the right situations, jsut like any tool. In the car, voice control is the killer app.

      --
      Good-bye
  27. You have to pay for it on the iphone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because if you have Android, you could steal it... so its free.

  28. Change of Motto by AnotherAnonymousUser · · Score: 2

    Apple's new slogan: "Don't Be Evi"

    1. Re:Change of Motto by Torodung · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought. Google is almost, but not quite, evil.

      Then I thought of the adorable Pokemon character and slept well.

  29. What does Evi look like? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Raj met hot Siri in person in the last/previous The Big Bang Theory episode as shown in this clip. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:What does Evi look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Big Bang Theory is to geeks as Tyler Perry shows are to African-Americans.

  30. Apple's success by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the key to Apple's success right there. It's all in the marketing. Take a feature that most people don't know they had (did google ever advertise voice services?) and make it the staple feature of the OS release. It for some reason makes the world salivate in awe.

    A few notables are the iCloud, and Facetime. The latter really had me scratching my head given that my not-smart phone was capable of doing that 10 years ago and Apple's Facetime wasn't even compatible with standard video calling methods. But none the less for some completely unknown reason people seem to go mental over these features.

    1. Re:Apple's success by Mithent · · Score: 1

      FaceTime was one that really bugged me, yes. Suddenly, video calling was the Next Big Thing, even though it was already widely available and actually not very popular (I've had phones capable of video calling for perhaps 8 years, and I've never made or received one video call, or seen anyone doing the same).

      When Apple add features, even if they're available on other platforms or are relatively minor improvements, they always dress them up as brand new and revolutionary. And, as much as it irritates me when they claim they've just invented Android's notifications system or video calling, it does work.

    2. Re:Apple's success by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Why, if it's "all in the marketing", are the results pretty consistently that Apple does something, people eat it up, and then competitors fall all over themselves trying to copy it? It's not always their original idea, but they often deliver the first implementation of the idea that is widely accepted.

      It's not all marketing, and any impartial look at things will tell you that. They deliver the smoothest user experience. The fact that it isn't the best product to please neckbeards does not mean it's nothing but marketing, though naturally neckbeards will see it that way.

      Most people are not only incapable of compiling their own sound drivers or loading custom roms onto their devices, they don't feel like they should have to start wrenching immediately to get a device to work they way they want it to.

      Apple makes things that work the way 80% of the population wants them to, smoothly and thoughtlessly.

    3. Re:Apple's success by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      The "innovation" with facetime is that you just push a button and it works, and chances are a lot of people you know have an iOS device, so you can actually use it.

      Before 3-4 years ago video chat wasn't nearly this trivial, and basically no novice users were using it.

    4. Re:Apple's success by metrometro · · Score: 1

      > That's the key to Apple's success right there. It's all in the marketing.

      Replace Marketing with UX design, and you're getting somewhere. If people don't know a feature exists, it's not a useful feature. People buy solutions, not features, and that Apple stuff sure seems popular.

    5. Re:Apple's success by c++0xFF · · Score: 2

      No, you have that backwards. Apple did nothing to make video chat "just work."

      The real "innovation" was having a platform so ubiquitous that you can make video chat and other features easy to use.

      That's about the only thing that everybody on /. can agree on: regardless of what you think about Apple and its devices, you can't deny that having a ubiquitous platform is key to Apple's continuing success, and let's them recreate old ideas into things that people actually use.

      What gets really annoying is to see the power that Apple has simply because it already has power. Kinda like looking at the "1%" and realizing that they have wealth simply because they have wealth, as most of their money comes from investing their money, not from hard work and innovation like "the rest of us." That perception of both Apple and the 1% probably isn't true (Apple really does make good products and the 1% usually work in positions using the talents that got them into the top 1% to begin with), but there you go.

    6. Re:Apple's success by clairity · · Score: 1

      marketing can't work without usefulness backing it up. the neat trick is that apple is able to convince even techies that it's all marketing and no actual engineering, programming, design, etc. (i.e., hard work) to make good products, which then makes the competition scratch their heads over how apple does it (it's just marketing, let's beat them with more features!). by being systematic about developing, releasing, and marketing features, apple is able to maximize their marketing spend (that is, they are a great product management organization) and be more profitable.

    7. Re:Apple's success by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree, definitely. In fact, I picked up a mytouch 4g just to try out android about a week ago. I'm running it now as a replacement for my iphone 3gs... the main reason was for the 4g/hspa network.

      I literally had to put no thought into using my old iphone, and I could do lots of stuff. Now, I find myself worrying more about the operating system than using the application. ugh. This coming from a UNIX guy! Before making siri competition, try making a full task switching interface built into the operating system without having to go through 3 menu clicks to get to it. (the pull-down is definitely not a task switching interface)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    8. Re:Apple's success by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      People have been using skype to do this for quite a while--I think I first made an account in 2005 or 2006 and wasn't exactly the first person on my block. Apple just delivered a complete package--phone with front facing camera (otherwise you either had to use a computer or one of those goofy cases people made with a double-mirror to aim the camera at you), software that supports video chat on said camera on day 1, and last but not least: marketing to convince people to try it.

      --
      Bottles.
    9. Re:Apple's success by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      That's something I dislike about iOS, that applications suspend in the way they do - sometimes I'd like for them to run in the background and for me to be able to define what that app does when "minimized" - suspend, or just move to the background.

      But I guess that interferes with what Apple sees as the higher good, which is keeping memory free and thus the UI not slowing down.

    10. Re:Apple's success by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      They marketed the fact that they had a seamless video chat experience. You have the software, the hardware, it was configured to work immediately, and other people you know had all these things too.

      There weren't a whole lot of grandparents using skype, before. Certainly there weren't many grandparents adding cameras and mics to their desktop. But how often do you hear today that a grandma and grandpa Facetime with their grandchildren - not because they know which end of a computer to talk to, but because they bought an iPad, and you just have to push that facetime button and you're up and running.

    11. Re:Apple's success by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No you miss the point. It is creating need by marketing. Voice features in Android are every bit as easy to use as on the iPhone. But people don't. My old Motorola phone from years gone by had the video call button right next to the standard call button on the contact list, yet people rarely used it. Now someone introduces facetime as the next thing since sliced bread and people start wanting the feature.

      You either create a feature that fits some dying need, or you create the dying need through marketing. Many of Apple's changes are the latter. Not all of course, no amount of marketing can polish a real turd, but without marketing apple would be nothing, and they are very good at it. The entire company has differentiated itself from being "not windows", to being "hip and cool".

    12. Re:Apple's success by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you live, but it has been trivial since 3G first became popular, and nearly every 3G phone supports it, which long predates any effort by Apple, and even predates Skype. Hell that was the "killer feature" of 3G, and the main advertising platform of the company 3 Mobile. One of my phones made it so trivial to use in fact that I quite often accidentally video called people when I just wanted voice chat. People didn't use it because it cost money, and ... what was the point when you can't walk down the street and talk at the same time?

      We see the same thing now, people go mental over meantioning Facetime as a feature but I don't know of anyone who actively uses it for anything other than a "hey check out what I can do" under the belief that their iPhones are special and their non-cool mates with a 8 year old Motorola Razr can't do the exact same thing. And you're right I know a lot of iOS users.

    13. Re:Apple's success by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's not always their original idea, but they often deliver the first implementation of the idea that is widely accepted.

      And that's why it's all marketing. Apple is great at it. They are fantastic at it. When someone else does something people go "meh." When Apple does something their marketing gurus do their best to increase demand. Once demand then rises every man and their dog attempt to ride on the hype.

      It's not ALL marketing. But marketing is an incredible component of any product. It's something which Apple do very well, and something which other companies are horrendous at (I'm looking at you Microsoft). I'm not saying that their products aren't good. They are and they need to be. Just that their incredibly dominant position is largely thanks to the fact that not only does the phone work, but the phone is "hip and cool".

  31. Scope problem. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    The app seems to be incredibly limited in scope. I tried "What is nine times forty-five?" The TTS service produced "What is 9*45".
    Evi's reply: "This looks like a maths question. Try asking it in words rather than using symbols like plus or asterisks".

    Like really? It identified it's a maths question, bloody pipe the result through wolfram alpha, or google and read the first answer. I had to re-ask "What is nine multiplied by forty-five?" and it correctly answered.

    There seems to be some serious scope issues. I couldn't even begin to ask how to add two numbers together without it complaining about the + symbol. It also sucks with names. In my experience too the app was unable to correctly pronounce Julia Gillard's name. It sounded more like Jill (the name) rather than Gill (fish anatomy) which it really is.

  32. Yet another exclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are quite a number of these Personal Assistant style speech-to-text apps kicking around on Android market and, with the exception of Jeanie and Talk To Me (both of which are complete crap), none of them will install on a Honeycomb tablet. Evi's requirements? "Android 2.2 and up." Hello, Android 3 here, that's better than 2.2! Makes me want to throw the tablet at Google's founders and buy an iPad.

  33. Re:Brazilian SIRI is awesome by pjabardo · · Score: 1

    So, you are the idiot I robbed last year? Don't feel bad about it, it wasn't personal.

  34. s/80%/98%/ by Brannon · · Score: 1

    good post otherwise

    1. Re:s/80%/98%/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your low UserID make you a fanman rather than a fanboy? Just asking because until Apple's market share is 98% or even 80% I can only assume you are basing your figures on something you found in the bible of Jobs or whatever the holy book your cult reads is called.

  35. Voice Actions is much better than Vlingo by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

    Actually, there's another product that's even better than Vlingo in my opinion. Voice Actions by Pannous blew Vlingo out of the water on my wife's iPhone 4. She, like a lot of folks, wanted an iPhone 4s, and yes, she mostly wanted it for Siri. Fortunately (in my opinion) the 4S phones were on back order the day she went to get hers, and she didn't feel like waiting so she got the iPhone 4 rather than spend the extra money for the 4s basically just so she could get 1 app.

    At first we tried Vlingo, and it was pretty good, but texting by voice was hit or miss especially if there was ANY kind of background noise. We tinkered with the settings several times, but could quite get it right. We tried a few different applications before we gave Voice Actions a try. My wife was pretty skeptical at this point, and had her mind made up that the only way she was going to get the results she wanted was by getting Siri, and was all but convinced that she was going to have to get an iPhone 4S. Well, she was a quick convert once we installed this app. The original free version had a limit of about 500 phrases (or something like that) that it would translate, then you'd have to un-install it and and re-install it, which was a bit of a pain in the ass, but that's since been fixed. There is apparently a paid version that's even better than the free version, but I think my wife is still using the free version (as far as I know anyway).

    Here is a YouTube clip of Voice Actions in action if you want to check it out.

  36. I suppose it's probably too late to tell Google... by nani+popoki · · Score: 1

    ...to do no Evi

  37. Apple will just sue over it :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple will either jail or sue the contributor of this anyhow, so as much as it might rock, it will sit in court with the 100 Billion dollar cashcow.

  38. Try Vlingo for non-US users by mykro76 · · Score: 1

    No doubt it is my weird Aussie / European accent, but I found that of the existing Android voice control apps, Siri and Jeannie both really struggled (they seem to have almost the same, if not the same backend), whereas Vlingo was much more accurate. Vlingo doesn't have as nice an interface as the other two however. YMMV. But Evi is by no means the only Siri competitor.

    1. Re:Try Vlingo for non-US users by mykro76 · · Score: 1

      gah.. I meant to type, *IRIS* and Jeannie