"Notice how the Time magazine cover sporting the nose-less girl went virtually unnoticed on the left"
Maybe those of us on the left noticed it and realized that us being there last year didn't stop it.
There is a key difference here. We know he has pissed off a lot of very powerful people. That doesn't mean he is innocent, though the withdrawn charges point that way, it just means we should be even more skeptical than usual.
It may be a rosy picture where you are, but here is a counter example from zip code 44107 http://www.esorn.ag.state.oh.us/Secured/p23.aspx?oid=B5K4SgwTrBM=
Theft and robbery don't fit most people's definitions of sex crimes, but there he is with those as the only crimes listed.
We're all quick to assume it is purely psychosomatic, but there may be another explanation. Poor ventilation choices, bad lighting, or paint could all cause the problems they mention.
Are you unable to see the difference between someone who blew up stuff, but not people, and went on to do stuff with his life and someone who killed lots of people. Separate from that most of us on the left never really give Ayers any thought. He makes a better boogieman for the right than icon for the left.
Neither of the two I've mentioned wrote the bill in question, so they didn't get to leave that part out. They came around to it on the balance of the whole package.
I'm not saying they are perfect, just that there are Democrats fighting for privacy. Bills like the Affordable Care Act aren't about a single issue like your health records, but hit a bunch of different points. Sometimes one priority wins out over another it doesn't mean that privacy is unimportant.
The second paragraoh doesn't really apply to this data set because it has the information broken down by sector as well as straight GDP info. Looking at other parts of the site it appears they use nation of production rather than nation of ownership of the companies.
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/industry/docs/M90.pdf It starts laying out the relevant parts of the methodology on page 13.
Protecting one governmental organization from FOIA requests isn't related to privacy questions, the topic at hand. They have both voted against things like the patriot act and FISA expansions.
I went with the Democrat, because you mentioned them specifically. There's also Barbara Lee of California. I 'm not saying the Democrats are doing well on this issue, I just take issue with the word All. There are differences among congresspeople and they should be acknowledged when present.
If they aren't producing something on the scale of at least a terabyte they probably don't have an IT department large enough to justify an internal charge back system and enterprise class storage.
Goat pricing is wildly variable in my experience. If you buy it in the suburbs it runs more than beef or pork. If you buy it in little ethnic shops it is dirt cheap.
"the trade suffers from a distinct lack of ethics and an abundance of greed and selfishness."
Have you looked at the business world at any point in your life? It may go against popular image, but a lot of drug dealers rely on their reputation and trust more than most business people. If a deal goes wrong they can't resort to the courts and violence is costly.
Slashdot Mirror
"Notice how the Time magazine cover sporting the nose-less girl went virtually unnoticed on the left" Maybe those of us on the left noticed it and realized that us being there last year didn't stop it.
There is a key difference here. We know he has pissed off a lot of very powerful people. That doesn't mean he is innocent, though the withdrawn charges point that way, it just means we should be even more skeptical than usual.
There is generally a sign in concert venues if taping is occurring.
It may be a rosy picture where you are, but here is a counter example from zip code 44107 http://www.esorn.ag.state.oh.us/Secured/p23.aspx?oid=B5K4SgwTrBM= Theft and robbery don't fit most people's definitions of sex crimes, but there he is with those as the only crimes listed.
We're all quick to assume it is purely psychosomatic, but there may be another explanation. Poor ventilation choices, bad lighting, or paint could all cause the problems they mention.
Another reminder of the importance of safe following distance, even for cops.
Really? He had to break the law to speak to his attorney. That doesn't sound like a law that worked.
Are you unable to see the difference between someone who blew up stuff, but not people, and went on to do stuff with his life and someone who killed lots of people. Separate from that most of us on the left never really give Ayers any thought. He makes a better boogieman for the right than icon for the left.
Neither of the two I've mentioned wrote the bill in question, so they didn't get to leave that part out. They came around to it on the balance of the whole package.
I'm not saying they are perfect, just that there are Democrats fighting for privacy. Bills like the Affordable Care Act aren't about a single issue like your health records, but hit a bunch of different points. Sometimes one priority wins out over another it doesn't mean that privacy is unimportant.
The second paragraoh doesn't really apply to this data set because it has the information broken down by sector as well as straight GDP info. Looking at other parts of the site it appears they use nation of production rather than nation of ownership of the companies. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/industry/docs/M90.pdf It starts laying out the relevant parts of the methodology on page 13.
The UN stats disagree with you. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/dnllist.asp
Protecting one governmental organization from FOIA requests isn't related to privacy questions, the topic at hand. They have both voted against things like the patriot act and FISA expansions.
I went with the Democrat, because you mentioned them specifically. There's also Barbara Lee of California. I 'm not saying the Democrats are doing well on this issue, I just take issue with the word All. There are differences among congresspeople and they should be acknowledged when present.
The US is still the world's largest manufacturing nation and many manufacturing companies are based in the US. http://www.industryweek.com/research/iw1000/2010/iw1000rank.asp Can we put this myth to rest at least until the US slips to second or third.
DeBeers was able to sustain a wildly lucrative monopoly without government assistance for roughly a century.
All? Dennis Kucinich would beg to differ.
1Gb/s internet connections have been rolled out in the US. http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20100324/FREE/100329930
If it is enlarged or shrunk sufficiently, then yes it is.
People lying and fabricating evidence has always been an issue. If they have a good vetting process I can see it being very useful.
If they aren't producing something on the scale of at least a terabyte they probably don't have an IT department large enough to justify an internal charge back system and enterprise class storage.
You should inform the FTC, it seems they aren't aware of that fact. http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre04.shtm If you are slow to report it you are responsible with a debit card more than you are with a credit card.
A puny sword cut in a pre-antibiotic military camp was no laughing matter.
Goat pricing is wildly variable in my experience. If you buy it in the suburbs it runs more than beef or pork. If you buy it in little ethnic shops it is dirt cheap.
"the trade suffers from a distinct lack of ethics and an abundance of greed and selfishness." Have you looked at the business world at any point in your life? It may go against popular image, but a lot of drug dealers rely on their reputation and trust more than most business people. If a deal goes wrong they can't resort to the courts and violence is costly.