My friend got a fix it tixket for his LEGAL flowmaster xhaust on his mustang. When the CHP officer approached him about the loud exhaust, my friend, a wise legally minded citizen, pulled out the spec sheet for the exhaust showing it was below 95db at some range (thelimit) and also a safety bulletin from the head of CHP in california stating that no CHP officer is trained or qualified to make exhaust sound level distinctions.
He was nearly arrested and still got the ticket. He won in court because the officer didn't show. IMHO the officer owes the court fees and should be fired. The reality is, law on your side or not, the good ole boy system is much deeper than you seem to think.
Actually, the post I replied to about 'first to publish' was about the small sample size. I made that clear when I stated they would likely reproduce the experiment hundreds of times on new experiments refining the method.d And then you saif they arent the first, and referenced a very different experiment that you could not discern as different....
Also, if it was published in Nature (one of the top 3 big journals), it is groundbreaking by the sheer fact Nature accepted and published. Ask an experienced colleague what it means to publish in Nature. I can save you the hassle: its a big golden trophy that will qualify your career as outstanding.
You are clearly not involved in science. As Ive said in other posts, the difference between the experiments is drastic, and the anxiety to publish increases as progress is made and potentially competing labs maybe finishing ahead. If you don't understand the significant difference between the experiments, you shouldn't pretend to (and thus equate them as so similar).
I can't believe Im responding to an AC, but the point is so powerful its worth it.
McCain and Palin were adamant about cutting research programs and were vocal in the campaign trail about cuts on fruitfly research. At one point, in response to inquiry on spending cuts, McCain said "I don't know why we're spending money researching fruitflies" in the context of cutting that funding.
First off, if you dont know *why*, you should find out first. Secondly, fruitfly research is responsible for some of the greatest discoveries of our time. Thirdy, in direct context, we discovered the Chromosome in fruitflies, Palin's son has an extra chromosome, and the scientific basis for understanding Downs syndrome all relies on the fruitfly research that preceded.
Again, a great example of ignorance without humility and the ridiculous mistakes and ideas that follow. Most of the public missed this very important point - that McCain, as a proud and ignorant Maverick, would not 'know why' and make reckless choices.
The discovery of telomeres and telomerases preceded this by a couple decades... and the transgenic inducible preceded the gene therapy...my point is that its still novel and interesting despite your opinion that it isnt.
My dad hypothesized this in the early 80s. Theory and proof are far diffetent... the same goes for transgenic inducible expression vs gene therapy.... the prior is a proof of concept, the latter is the pudding.
The value of being first to publish is wat youre talking about. Clearly the lab will reproduce the scenario dozens of times on hundreds of mice as they pursue further refining/expansion of this very interesting technique.
I know how all of it works. The issue is that you use your 'argument' selectively, and yet in actuality it is irrational/nonsensical. You don't hear yourself saying two things at the same time right now? Oh wait, maybe you should point at one more spurious circumstance, claim it is absolutely responsible (without reference), and 'prove' your point one more time!
I'll wait while I laugh at how stupid you sound. You're just like Bill O'Reilly, ad hominems, worthless fallacy, some sort of 'appeal to authority' in your tone... What a joke.
You just spin it how you like and say its that way... lol. Too bad you probably vote, and also the ignorant peeps that surround you probably eat up your irrational arguments all day just like O'Reilly fans...
Its International Anti-Trust anticompetitive at its most obvious.... but we dont stop it with tarriffs.... why? International corps own us, too. No american citizen can get any respect close to a large financial entity.... Money is God in the USA... what a shame.
If there really was a balance, wha you said would make sense... but then the reality of the imbalance, the power that employers weild over those desparate for income in a world biased to benefit that employer, is blatant... and then your libertarian fantasy falls apart.
Give the people as many companies to apply to, as there are job-seekers in their field, and maybe we can feel empowered enough to say no. Reality says "I need health insurancec, and the only company hiring is that oligopoly partner."
Actually, the CEO of one company is on the board for another company whose CEO is on their board. There is a site called theyrule tht tracks these connections to demonstrate the complex collusion/extortion going on among corporate leadership and their siphoning of wealth from the small guys that actually invest in their businesses. Decades ago, those milions went to the owners (stockholders), but as the coup has entrenched, the excess has become standardized and regularly increased.
I contribute my life to basic research for a drastic pay cut. I would be making over 100k had I stayed kn government work in my previous field. But it was immoral and I went back to univ. and am now a stemcell researcher at UCSF barely making ends meet... so as of right now, 0.
Slashdot Mirror
My friend got a fix it tixket for his LEGAL flowmaster xhaust on his mustang. When the CHP officer approached him about the loud exhaust, my friend, a wise legally minded citizen, pulled out the spec sheet for the exhaust showing it was below 95db at some range (thelimit) and also a safety bulletin from the head of CHP in california stating that no CHP officer is trained or qualified to make exhaust sound level distinctions.
He was nearly arrested and still got the ticket. He won in court because the officer didn't show. IMHO the officer owes the court fees and should be fired. The reality is, law on your side or not, the good ole boy system is much deeper than you seem to think.
L m f a o. well played.
9 dashcams failed, and you're an apologist? Please go away to some crappy country that deserves such foolish citizens.
Are you new to the internet? i'm serious.
Actually, the post I replied to about 'first to publish' was about the small sample size. I made that clear when I stated they would likely reproduce the experiment hundreds of times on new experiments refining the method.d
And then you saif they arent the first, and referenced a very different experiment that you could not discern as different....
Anyway... you should read better. Bye.
Also, if it was published in Nature (one of the top 3 big journals), it is groundbreaking by the sheer fact Nature accepted and published. Ask an experienced colleague what it means to publish in Nature. I can save you the hassle: its a big golden trophy that will qualify your career as outstanding.
You are clearly not involved in science. As Ive said in other posts, the difference between the experiments is drastic, and the anxiety to publish increases as progress is made and potentially competing labs maybe finishing ahead. If you don't understand the significant difference between the experiments, you shouldn't pretend to (and thus equate them as so similar).
I do stemcell research in a top notch lab.
I can't believe Im responding to an AC, but the point is so powerful its worth it.
McCain and Palin were adamant about cutting research programs and were vocal in the campaign trail about cuts on fruitfly research. At one point, in response to inquiry on spending cuts, McCain said "I don't know why we're spending money researching fruitflies" in the context of cutting that funding.
First off, if you dont know *why*, you should find out first. Secondly, fruitfly research is responsible for some of the greatest discoveries of our time. Thirdy, in direct context, we discovered the Chromosome in fruitflies, Palin's son has an extra chromosome, and the scientific basis for understanding Downs syndrome all relies on the fruitfly research that preceded.
Again, a great example of ignorance without humility and the ridiculous mistakes and ideas that follow. Most of the public missed this very important point - that McCain, as a proud and ignorant Maverick, would not 'know why' and make reckless choices.
The discovery of telomeres and telomerases preceded this by a couple decades... and the transgenic inducible preceded the gene therapy...my point is that its still novel and interesting despite your opinion that it isnt.
My dad hypothesized this in the early 80s. Theory and proof are far diffetent... the same goes for transgenic inducible expression vs gene therapy.... the prior is a proof of concept, the latter is the pudding.
Lmfao.... reminds me of the sheer ignorance that McCain snd Palin demonstrated regarding fruit flies. good poke.
Lying troll.
The value of being first to publish is wat youre talking about. Clearly the lab will reproduce the scenario dozens of times on hundreds of mice as they pursue further refining/expansion of this very interesting technique.
I know how all of it works. The issue is that you use your 'argument' selectively, and yet in actuality it is irrational/nonsensical. You don't hear yourself saying two things at the same time right now? Oh wait, maybe you should point at one more spurious circumstance, claim it is absolutely responsible (without reference), and 'prove' your point one more time!
I'll wait while I laugh at how stupid you sound. You're just like Bill O'Reilly, ad hominems, worthless fallacy, some sort of 'appeal to authority' in your tone... What a joke.
You just spin it how you like and say its that way... lol. Too bad you probably vote, and also the ignorant peeps that surround you probably eat up your irrational arguments all day just like O'Reilly fans...
Its International Anti-Trust anticompetitive at its most obvious.... but we dont stop it with tarriffs.... why? International corps own us, too. No american citizen can get any respect close to a large financial entity.... Money is God in the USA... what a shame.
So the republican congress we are staring at is responsble for the weak economy? H wait, I bet you cant wait to join your friends and blame Obama.
Eat your words.
These attacks are illegal under US law and Microshit conspiring to fund it is only asking for serious fines/injunctions.
If there really was a balance, wha you said would make sense... but then the reality of the imbalance, the power that employers weild over those desparate for income in a world biased to benefit that employer, is blatant... and then your libertarian fantasy falls apart.
Give the people as many companies to apply to, as there are job-seekers in their field, and maybe we can feel empowered enough to say no. Reality says "I need health insurancec, and the only company hiring is that oligopoly partner."
Actually, the media reflects the public: naive, poorly understanding,irrational, fearful, and too proud to defer belief to experts.
No. Just grow a pair and never ever vote for any politician supporting this garbage. That is all that we need... the balls to say NO.
Actually, the CEO of one company is on the board for another company whose CEO is on their board. There is a site called theyrule tht tracks these connections to demonstrate the complex collusion/extortion going on among corporate leadership and their siphoning of wealth from the small guys that actually invest in their businesses. Decades ago, those milions went to the owners (stockholders), but as the coup has entrenched, the excess has become standardized and regularly increased.
MBA is also the easiest postbac related degree on earth.
Once or twice? Are ya'll listening to Aubrey DuGrey? Dude said (I think with much hope) that we may well live 500 years+.....
Mortality sucks.
To reinforce your point, Manson. Didn't kill anyone, nor did OBL.
I contribute my life to basic research for a drastic pay cut. I would be making over 100k had I stayed kn government work in my previous field. But it was immoral and I went back to univ. and am now a stemcell researcher at UCSF barely making ends meet... so as of right now, 0.