The libraries have a GPL exception (or the GPL has an exception itself which I believe to be less likely)
Just as libgcc has a GPL exception to let people make proprietary software on Linux, isn't the opposite true for.NET? This is news to me.
To sell GPL'd software: OK.
To link GPL'd software with non-GPL'd software (e.g. Iphone libraries) : Not OK to distribute. Verify if you are linking with non-GPL, and if so, change the GPL to something else, perhaps BSD or MIT.
Goodness, first depression, now creativity linked to schizophrenia? What next? It's becoming like stress, you will soon be able to attribute it to anything.
Still, many strong passwords for different things, changed regularly plus many Linux Live CDs to stop weird software, plus hardware checks, plus fingerprint readers will prevent it all from being doooooomed!
Most people are still silly enough to use a broken system that NEEDS an antivirus. If they had chosen a system that wasn't susceptible due to better security practises by default, and that it was extremely difficult to get a virus on, (such as a system with clean repositories that requires you to be a normal user, not an admin) the problem would largely solve itself. And these systems are often available for free! What gives?
Slashdot Mirror
Of course. But real results will not differ by much. Firefox is still the most popular browser as anything else will tell you.
Most use Firefox, you insensitive clod!
Then by rights, Firefox takes the top place. From W3 (other sources will show same result): FF 47.3% IE 40.7% IE 6 15%
Apologies. I was under the impression that apps needed to be linked to the system libraries.
The libraries have a GPL exception (or the GPL has an exception itself which I believe to be less likely) Just as libgcc has a GPL exception to let people make proprietary software on Linux, isn't the opposite true for .NET? This is news to me.
To sell GPL'd software: OK. To link GPL'd software with non-GPL'd software (e.g. Iphone libraries) : Not OK to distribute. Verify if you are linking with non-GPL, and if so, change the GPL to something else, perhaps BSD or MIT.
Think of the implications this could have. I can have my giant army of penguins in no time! Mwuhahahahahaaa!
Yes,, and we ALL want censorship!
The best choice, dunno why we can't make the same one.
Why can't more of us be like them?
For goodness' sakes, just kill IE! How bloody hard is that?
Alright, if you want to make getting all the newer software you want more difficult!
Hey! You can fly endlessly in my cloud!
Unstable... or "testing"...haha Standardisation would be nice- but not everyone would agree with it.
The solution would be to stick the recent versions of every program in ONE repo so that we don't keep having to add them to our sources.list!
Noo! Please! No more PPAs!
Goodness, first depression, now creativity linked to schizophrenia? What next? It's becoming like stress, you will soon be able to attribute it to anything.
How about Helmer? http://helmer.sfe.se/
This will certainly run Linux... ...but when will they make an ARM version? I want 15 hours dammit!
Haha, "should not"... OK. Good good. My data is uber secure!
So, just one that's encrypted is good enough then. If people really want something, they WILL get the data.
So it blows out the circuitry, but what about the flash? Someone could just recover that.
Still, many strong passwords for different things, changed regularly plus many Linux Live CDs to stop weird software, plus hardware checks, plus fingerprint readers will prevent it all from being doooooomed!
What? We're still using rockets???
Most people are still silly enough to use a broken system that NEEDS an antivirus. If they had chosen a system that wasn't susceptible due to better security practises by default, and that it was extremely difficult to get a virus on, (such as a system with clean repositories that requires you to be a normal user, not an admin) the problem would largely solve itself. And these systems are often available for free! What gives?