Surely a straight launch puts much less stress on a vehicle, since it spends less time/distance in the atmosphere. Also, the Falcon 9 is far from a new rocket.
It's Uber: a company literally built on cutting corners, ignoring regulations and deceiving employees and customers and investors to win the next round of funding. Hardly tinfoil hat to think they'd do some illegal manipulation if they felt it was important to their future ability to raise money.
Not true. Given recent news of people hurling their bodies at self-driving cars which are stopped at lights, we need a car which actively evades people who are chasing it.
There are more than two choices. The problem is that this kind of bill is wildly popular with voters, so nobody will vote for the kind of candidate who opposes it.
The bill has nothing to do with ISPs. It repeatedly talks about websites, and it also talks about deliberate intent to facilitate sex trafficking.
The question is, can intentionally setting up an unmoderated forum be seen as deliberately facilitating crimes that may be discussed there? Is there an obligation to attempt to moderate content?
The left wants to bring in cheap labor from other countries and let them integrate. The people in power on the right want to bring in cheap labor from other countries from other countries and employ every power of government to keep them from gaining any rights that might make them more expensive or uppity, and keep their children and their children's children in a legal gray area for maximum exploitation. The voters on the right don't want to allow cheap labor in, and stupidly think that letting the cheap labor be abused brings them closer to that goal, when in reality it's used to pressure the native workforce down closer to those conditions.
A significant fraction of commuters who have to drive after not getting enough sleep last night will experience random seconds of microsleep. Computers are much easier to make fail deterministic into a shut down and stop moving state instead of a foot on the gas state.
How many times a year does your computer freeze and need to be power-cycled, versus your brain doing the same.
I can't remember when I last had to power-cycle my PC, but it certainly wasn't this year. Could easily go a decade on cheap commodity hardware if you're running a stable operating system and not installing random buggy proprietary drivers.
And of course, just about any car made since the early 90s has a computer running an essential part of it (fuel injection).
That only ever sounded reasonable to the very few people who live in Canada, Siberia and Alaska. It never sounded reasonable to the billion people who've build their cities at sea level, who would much rather deal with the lowering sea levels of an ice age (which is an economic problem to be sure but one they can expand the city to adapt to) than rising sea level (a much much bigger economic problem).
The difference between 250,000 miles up and 95,000,000 miles actually isn't much at all. In fact you'll need considerably less fuel to reach Kepler at 95M than to land on the moon.
There's really no sense in designing a refuelable planet-hunting space telescope, because by the end of the primary mission the technology has moved on to better readings on smaller planets.
Cars are extremely useful, cryptocurrencies provide nothing of value to the economy. Cars charge mostly at night when other use is low, mining rigs usually run all day. It's not hard to see the difference in value.
The trouble with banning people who haven't paid a fine from trains is that preventing them from getting to their job certainly isn't going to help them pay off the fine any faster.
Coincidentally, I was listening to him count down the seconds to his battery depletion death as the guide mark II at nearly the exact time he died in real life.
If you have the magic tech to raise the dead, you can also have separate real or virtual planets for them to inhabit which will suit their particular outdated desires. And there's certainly no need to give the undead the right to vote on Earth.
Southern California actually has all of those forms of weather, just not in the big cities. Plenty of mountains and deserts to test on if they wish. Regardless, though, it would make far more sense to handle easier conditions first. A flying car doesn't have to deliver emergency supplies to a siberian research team in a blizzard to be useful... and it doesn't have to be useful for you to be useful.
There are no likely LEO payloads for Falcon Heavy. It's meant for geosynchronous orbits, namely being able to deliver satellites to GTO the size of ones previously only possible in LEO.
Paul Ryan isn't a sociopath by any stretch of the imagination. He's simply an intelligent person who probably means well most of the time but has very different goals from mine. Don't conflate him with someone like Trump who's entirely about himself.
Trump canceled the Mars program and is aiming for the moon. And personally I don't remember when Obama talked about trains, so it clearly wasn't a big deal -- California voters and Jerry Brown are the ones who pushed for trains.
He's speaking specifically about his plan for Los Angeles, a city infamously devoid of non-car transit options. But yes, even there many people are unable or unwilling to drive for reasons other than cost.
Servers have large attack surfaces, especially when they're hosting third party scripts for thousands of people who don't care about your security. Call me when a linux desktop is infected.
Slashdot Mirror
Surely a straight launch puts much less stress on a vehicle, since it spends less time/distance in the atmosphere. Also, the Falcon 9 is far from a new rocket.
It's Uber: a company literally built on cutting corners, ignoring regulations and deceiving employees and customers and investors to win the next round of funding. Hardly tinfoil hat to think they'd do some illegal manipulation if they felt it was important to their future ability to raise money.
Not true. Given recent news of people hurling their bodies at self-driving cars which are stopped at lights, we need a car which actively evades people who are chasing it.
It says right in the summary: "In both cases, a successful firmware update is the proof that your device has never been compromised."
There are more than two choices. The problem is that this kind of bill is wildly popular with voters, so nobody will vote for the kind of candidate who opposes it.
The question is, can intentionally setting up an unmoderated forum be seen as deliberately facilitating crimes that may be discussed there? Is there an obligation to attempt to moderate content?
The left wants to bring in cheap labor from other countries and let them integrate. The people in power on the right want to bring in cheap labor from other countries from other countries and employ every power of government to keep them from gaining any rights that might make them more expensive or uppity, and keep their children and their children's children in a legal gray area for maximum exploitation. The voters on the right don't want to allow cheap labor in, and stupidly think that letting the cheap labor be abused brings them closer to that goal, when in reality it's used to pressure the native workforce down closer to those conditions.
No, not nearly enough, which is why most farm workers are on seasonal permits and go home to Mexico the rest of the year.
A significant fraction of commuters who have to drive after not getting enough sleep last night will experience random seconds of microsleep. Computers are much easier to make fail deterministic into a shut down and stop moving state instead of a foot on the gas state.
I can't remember when I last had to power-cycle my PC, but it certainly wasn't this year. Could easily go a decade on cheap commodity hardware if you're running a stable operating system and not installing random buggy proprietary drivers.
And of course, just about any car made since the early 90s has a computer running an essential part of it (fuel injection).
That only ever sounded reasonable to the very few people who live in Canada, Siberia and Alaska. It never sounded reasonable to the billion people who've build their cities at sea level, who would much rather deal with the lowering sea levels of an ice age (which is an economic problem to be sure but one they can expand the city to adapt to) than rising sea level (a much much bigger economic problem).
The difference between 250,000 miles up and 95,000,000 miles actually isn't much at all. In fact you'll need considerably less fuel to reach Kepler at 95M than to land on the moon.
There's really no sense in designing a refuelable planet-hunting space telescope, because by the end of the primary mission the technology has moved on to better readings on smaller planets.
Cars are extremely useful, cryptocurrencies provide nothing of value to the economy. Cars charge mostly at night when other use is low, mining rigs usually run all day. It's not hard to see the difference in value.
The trouble with banning people who haven't paid a fine from trains is that preventing them from getting to their job certainly isn't going to help them pay off the fine any faster.
Coincidentally, I was listening to him count down the seconds to his battery depletion death as the guide mark II at nearly the exact time he died in real life.
If you have the magic tech to raise the dead, you can also have separate real or virtual planets for them to inhabit which will suit their particular outdated desires. And there's certainly no need to give the undead the right to vote on Earth.
Southern California actually has all of those forms of weather, just not in the big cities. Plenty of mountains and deserts to test on if they wish. Regardless, though, it would make far more sense to handle easier conditions first. A flying car doesn't have to deliver emergency supplies to a siberian research team in a blizzard to be useful... and it doesn't have to be useful for you to be useful.
There are no likely LEO payloads for Falcon Heavy. It's meant for geosynchronous orbits, namely being able to deliver satellites to GTO the size of ones previously only possible in LEO.
Paul Ryan isn't a sociopath by any stretch of the imagination. He's simply an intelligent person who probably means well most of the time but has very different goals from mine. Don't conflate him with someone like Trump who's entirely about himself.
Trump canceled the Mars program and is aiming for the moon. And personally I don't remember when Obama talked about trains, so it clearly wasn't a big deal -- California voters and Jerry Brown are the ones who pushed for trains.
He already owns the most powerful rocket on the planet, so he's won a marathon. This is about plans for the next one.
It's effectively a fast train with more privacy. Expect it to be priced accordingly.
He's speaking specifically about his plan for Los Angeles, a city infamously devoid of non-car transit options. But yes, even there many people are unable or unwilling to drive for reasons other than cost.
Servers have large attack surfaces, especially when they're hosting third party scripts for thousands of people who don't care about your security. Call me when a linux desktop is infected.