She has been charged with Fraud under The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. She is not charged with murder. It isn't lying about her name that is the problem, it's the fact that she did it for the reason that she did.
Still, it would have been better to get her on child abuse charges. She's good as confessed to it and she's absolutely guilty.
That's debatable the future 'leaders of the third world' are mostly sitting in American and European schools today. This development insures that any software market that develops there will, for practical purposes, be a fully owned subsidiary of Microsoft.
Who told you the President has the power? He's just a figurehead, the people who paid for his election campaign are the ones with the power. He's either an 'investment' of the wealthy or he's one of those nominees that nobody has heard of.
I know people who can't read and ride in a car. Not drive, ride. It should be pretty obvious that diverting attention from one task reduces the quality of thinking involved in both lines of thought. Back when I first started driving I noticed a greater number of mistakes when the music was on or someone was talking to me.
The radio is all commercials and crap so it was pretty easy to lose but it can be a challenge getting passengers to shut up sometimes. One of these days I am likely to taser somebody for saying "Hey look!" and pointing somewhere while we're in the middle of a busy intersection.
This is easily done when you created the market in the first place. Remember that to most people advertising is valid information, i.e they take it seriously on the "If it was wrong the majority wouldn't go for it." theory. Not only that they probably don't even know about alternatives unless they've got a massive ad budget behind them so as far as the public are concerned MS won't be trying to push into this market, they'll be 'innovating'.
Following this sort of cycle is very good policy for those committed to following the crowd. Where that crowd is heading is usually another concern entirely in a sub-culture that views 1 year as long-term. The fact that it leads you to follow only manufactured demand is irrelevant.
Given enough money to finance a large ad campaign getting people to go exactly where you want them to go is quite doable. Especially when you've got the games market essentially locked up.
Agreed, the 'Great filter' is almost certainly a multi-stage event that includes, at least the development of intelligence and the development of technology. It seems likely that, if we do make it, we'll eventually find evidence of large-brained lifeforms that may or may not be intelligent, like dolphins, for example. The existence, or non-existence of life on mars does not add enough data points to say very much about it either way.
An aside: Perhaps the 'Continue Editing' button should read 'Delete Post And Start Over' as that seems to be what it does.:-)
Associating Open Source with soccialism is suicidal in business terms. This would be an effective, if not particularly subtle, way for the linux vendors to shoot themselves in the head marketing-wise.
It would be more productive to note that what Brasil is doing here is merely acknowledging the realities of captalism. In order for an nation to keep it's software industry healthy, it must first develop such an industry. As long as Brasilian developers are writing Microsoft software they are writing American software. While the Americans support this for various reasons (no doubt including socialism-vs-captalism politics) there is no long-term life in it for Brasil.
Slashdot Mirror
She has been charged with Fraud under The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. She is not charged with murder. It isn't lying about her name that is the problem, it's the fact that she did it for the reason that she did. Still, it would have been better to get her on child abuse charges. She's good as confessed to it and she's absolutely guilty.
That's no asteroid, it's Ming The Merciless. Where's Flash Gordon when we need him?
That's debatable the future 'leaders of the third world' are mostly sitting in American and European schools today. This development insures that any software market that develops there will, for practical purposes, be a fully owned subsidiary of Microsoft.
Well, of course. It's easier to stay pure and true to one's principles when those principles are subject to revision.
Who told you the President has the power? He's just a figurehead, the people who paid for his election campaign are the ones with the power. He's either an 'investment' of the wealthy or he's one of those nominees that nobody has heard of.
The radio is all commercials and crap so it was pretty easy to lose but it can be a challenge getting passengers to shut up sometimes. One of these days I am likely to taser somebody for saying "Hey look!" and pointing somewhere while we're in the middle of a busy intersection.
This is easily done when you created the market in the first place. Remember that to most people advertising is valid information, i.e they take it seriously on the "If it was wrong the majority wouldn't go for it." theory. Not only that they probably don't even know about alternatives unless they've got a massive ad budget behind them so as far as the public are concerned MS won't be trying to push into this market, they'll be 'innovating'.
Following this sort of cycle is very good policy for those committed to following the crowd. Where that crowd is heading is usually another concern entirely in a sub-culture that views 1 year as long-term. The fact that it leads you to follow only manufactured demand is irrelevant.
Given enough money to finance a large ad campaign getting people to go exactly where you want them to go is quite doable. Especially when you've got the games market essentially locked up.
Agreed, the 'Great filter' is almost certainly a multi-stage event that includes, at least the development of intelligence and the development of technology. It seems likely that, if we do make it, we'll eventually find evidence of large-brained lifeforms that may or may not be intelligent, like dolphins, for example. The existence, or non-existence of life on mars does not add enough data points to say very much about it either way.
An aside: Perhaps the 'Continue Editing' button should read 'Delete Post And Start Over' as that seems to be what it does. :-)
Associating Open Source with soccialism is suicidal in business terms. This would be an effective, if not particularly subtle, way for the linux vendors to shoot themselves in the head marketing-wise. It would be more productive to note that what Brasil is doing here is merely acknowledging the realities of captalism. In order for an nation to keep it's software industry healthy, it must first develop such an industry. As long as Brasilian developers are writing Microsoft software they are writing American software. While the Americans support this for various reasons (no doubt including socialism-vs-captalism politics) there is no long-term life in it for Brasil.