My browser will automatically provide my e-mail address? The very thing I do NOT want to provide when signing in with the majority of sites?
Also, as a web developer, I think it is a real bad design error to use an e-mail address as a login. What happens if you change your provider? Do you log in with your new (thus unknown) e-mail address? Or do you want to send the lost password to the no longer existing one?
But the US really wages war. Drugs are fought with jet bombers. Terrorism is fought with jet bombers - heck, two whole countries are almost wiped off the map to find two terrorists. Even international justice will probably fought with jet bombers. The threat has been issued already. I wish the USA would see that the War On [please fill in here] were not meant literally.
Same here. But the banks have fought back. Banks are not open anymore outside office hours, so I have the choice to either take a day off to get my money or to use an ATM. Where I live, you cannot even bring cash to a bank anymore. You read that right: banks don't accept cash. Banks' terms of service include sections on how you MUST cooperate into investigations about where your money is from. And our government made a bank account compulsory for the payment of salaries. You are very lucky to live in a place that allows such free behaviour.
Look at what happened to the small aircraft industry in the USA. It has completely vanished. No smaller-than-huge company can survive a law suit anymore. Just one stupid "cat in the oven" suit can completely ruin a company and deter all the others in the field. In the end, it is only the big companies that survive.
Maybe it is the world we live in. There are also great patent difficulties in DNA engineering, and a hardware factory is built before you can say "oops". So if you invent a nice structure and want to build it yourself, your competitors can often beat you in mere days. Even if you license the production to a factory, you can be beat before you know it.
But I don't think that was any different in the old days. Maybe there weren't that many patents and maybe it was expensive even for a company to have a "defensive portfolio", but when the steam engine became economical enough for commercial production, none of the manufacturers could (or wanted to pay up to) build a state-of-the-art machine. There's always a technology that is "hot". Now it is bio-engineering and software engineering, back then it was steam power. It is these "hot" technologies that suffer. Nothing has changed, really.
So the US threatening to attack the Netherlands with military force if any american must appear before the International Court of Justice is NOT a declaration of war? Then what is?
Absolutely true. But the very same applies to any technology. The steam engine wasn't invented in one go either, and patents hindered its development also as different "inventors" did not want to pay for each other's patents.
Even better: patents are not transferable period. You can't give the fact that you've invented something away. This does not hinder the fact that the inventor is not a full-size factory: the inventor can always grant a factory a license to manufacture under his patent.
The bionic brains of politicians are already operated by monkeys for years. That is why they talk sense once in a while. It is only natural to extend that success to other implants.
Did they only look at the hits or also at the misses? There are bound to be enough songs that abide the "formula" but lack enough musicality to become a hit.
Probably not, Because such a list should at least identify you. I find such a list just too stupid for words, because you first have to be identified to be looked up on the list, while I don't want to be identified at all.
The first law of security is that if anyone get in, anyone can get in. If you make sensitive data available via the web, it is accessible via the web. By anyone. You can make it hard to access, even extremely hard to access, but not impossible. So the very first step in security is the question why the hell you would want to hand over your responsibilities to some automaton that can be accessed by anyone.
Slashdot Mirror
The people who can have their internet connection ended without trial are of course no party in such cases. Silly me. How could they?
If the combination of a spoon and a fork is a spork, I suggest you name it "splork".
That means you can visit a g.co shortcut confident you will always end up at a page for a Google product or service.
I'm only confident that I will be tracked, photographed, my wifi details leaked and/or x-rayed. Privacy stops wherever you g.co?
My browser will automatically provide my e-mail address? The very thing I do NOT want to provide when signing in with the majority of sites?
Also, as a web developer, I think it is a real bad design error to use an e-mail address as a login. What happens if you change your provider? Do you log in with your new (thus unknown) e-mail address? Or do you want to send the lost password to the no longer existing one?
But the US really wages war. Drugs are fought with jet bombers. Terrorism is fought with jet bombers - heck, two whole countries are almost wiped off the map to find two terrorists. Even international justice will probably fought with jet bombers. The threat has been issued already. I wish the USA would see that the War On [please fill in here] were not meant literally.
"Eat this": http://3dprintingevent.com/2011/07/05/3d-printer-produces-personalised-3d-chocolate/
Some internet cafés already do this. There is an internet connection and a wall socket. And coffee and good company.
Same here. But the banks have fought back. Banks are not open anymore outside office hours, so I have the choice to either take a day off to get my money or to use an ATM. Where I live, you cannot even bring cash to a bank anymore. You read that right: banks don't accept cash. Banks' terms of service include sections on how you MUST cooperate into investigations about where your money is from. And our government made a bank account compulsory for the payment of salaries. You are very lucky to live in a place that allows such free behaviour.
Look at what happened to the small aircraft industry in the USA. It has completely vanished. No smaller-than-huge company can survive a law suit anymore. Just one stupid "cat in the oven" suit can completely ruin a company and deter all the others in the field. In the end, it is only the big companies that survive.
3) Now find the obvious analogy with fire arms.
Is when cloud computing is done by thunderclouds - battling each other!
Maybe it is the world we live in. There are also great patent difficulties in DNA engineering, and a hardware factory is built before you can say "oops". So if you invent a nice structure and want to build it yourself, your competitors can often beat you in mere days. Even if you license the production to a factory, you can be beat before you know it.
But I don't think that was any different in the old days. Maybe there weren't that many patents and maybe it was expensive even for a company to have a "defensive portfolio", but when the steam engine became economical enough for commercial production, none of the manufacturers could (or wanted to pay up to) build a state-of-the-art machine. There's always a technology that is "hot". Now it is bio-engineering and software engineering, back then it was steam power. It is these "hot" technologies that suffer. Nothing has changed, really.
So the US threatening to attack the Netherlands with military force if any american must appear before the International Court of Justice is NOT a declaration of war? Then what is?
Neither off course.
No. there is nothing civil about that union.
Absolutely true. But the very same applies to any technology. The steam engine wasn't invented in one go either, and patents hindered its development also as different "inventors" did not want to pay for each other's patents.
Who else? Isn't the USPTO a government organization?
Even better: patents are not transferable period. You can't give the fact that you've invented something away. This does not hinder the fact that the inventor is not a full-size factory: the inventor can always grant a factory a license to manufacture under his patent.
Which means they don't. If only megacorps can compete, something's awfully wrong with the market.
The bionic brains of politicians are already operated by monkeys for years. That is why they talk sense once in a while. It is only natural to extend that success to other implants.
I did not do my homework because my batteries ran out.
Did they only look at the hits or also at the misses? There are bound to be enough songs that abide the "formula" but lack enough musicality to become a hit.
Probably not, Because such a list should at least identify you. I find such a list just too stupid for words, because you first have to be identified to be looked up on the list, while I don't want to be identified at all.
The first law of security is that if anyone get in, anyone can get in. If you make sensitive data available via the web, it is accessible via the web. By anyone. You can make it hard to access, even extremely hard to access, but not impossible. So the very first step in security is the question why the hell you would want to hand over your responsibilities to some automaton that can be accessed by anyone.
Indeed. This is discrimination. We who have no long-time memory also have rights!