So if this passes (completely hypothetical here), in light of Kentucky's recent law and resulting ruling: wouldn't they be able to prosecute offenders from out of state who publish their content in their state?
I agree with you, but would take it a step further.
Isn't evolution encouraged in creatures with shorter lifespans?
I'm too lazy to drudge up the articles I got this from but I thought there was a trade off.
Early parenthood results in oodles of mutations but lowers overall lifespans. The theory goes that once an animal has reproduced, its passed on its genetic contribution and its body shuts down.
On the other hand, late parenthood decreases overall mutations over time but increases the lifespan of the descendants.
Take this as hearsay though, since I can't remember my sources.
Here are some thing they could do: 1) Don't let anyone mine/pick anything that there skill level makes gray to them. 2) put some random drift into movement. 3) limit the price you can sell something for on the AH to 10 times what a vendor would pay 4) don't allow the transfer of more then 100GP a time. Maybe a one time unlimited amount per month.
1. Makes having the mining/crafting skill trivial and severely limits players from gathering low or mid level resources. Want to mine that iron? Tough, drop your mining skill and level it back up. In turn, that will increase prices on the Auction house to ridiculous levels. 2. Node drifts underground, no one can harvest it. 3. Vendors pay very little compared to what demand will bring for an item. Plus, putting artificial boundaries on prices can easily destabilize the economy. 4. It's been a couple years since I've played WoW, but even then, there were a lot of items/services that would gross well over 100 gold. Now that the level cap is 70 and flying mounts cost a bagilion gold, I'm sure the value of gold in WoW has only gone down (meaning higher prices all around).
I liked the ideas at first, but as I thought about the game mechanics, realized they would only frustrate Blizzard's customers.
When you compare the same jobs, same qualifications, same experience, same competency and same working hours, there is no meaningful difference between male and female salaries.
At my last job I, and about every other man, was overlooked for positions and raises for women that had less education than, less experience and less seniority.
Sure, it might be better on average. But in certain industries, it hurts to be a man, and there's no affirmative action group for us. Frankly, I don't want one. I find better opportunities elsewhere.
I read TFA as up to the point where people started screaming "unfair".
After reading about the devices they're considering to prevent cheating (like blocking http traffic on the client machine), I don't think there's anything that a KVM and second computer wouldn't be able to get past. Just remember to keep the camera BEHIND the monitor.
Slashdot Mirror
Unfortunately without knowledge of how an attack might take place, most users will simply permanently allow every site that comes their way.
So if this passes (completely hypothetical here), in light of Kentucky's recent law and resulting ruling: wouldn't they be able to prosecute offenders from out of state who publish their content in their state?
Do the opium wars mean anything to anyone?
I'm no history student, but didn't opium play a key role in the toppling of the Chinese empire by foreign powers?
the new scifi reality show cha$e have people with glasses mounted cameras. it's pretty much a headache to watch it when they switch to that view.
I wonder why they don't just put a gyro on the camera. They can get pretty small.
http://www.physorg.com/news639.html
but the reward is so much greater when you actually play
but the chicks are so much hotter when you actually play
There, I fixed it.
I agree with you, but would take it a step further.
Isn't evolution encouraged in creatures with shorter lifespans?
I'm too lazy to drudge up the articles I got this from but I thought there was a trade off.
Early parenthood results in oodles of mutations but lowers overall lifespans. The theory goes that once an animal has reproduced, its passed on its genetic contribution and its body shuts down.
On the other hand, late parenthood decreases overall mutations over time but increases the lifespan of the descendants.
Take this as hearsay though, since I can't remember my sources.
Here are some thing they could do:
1) Don't let anyone mine/pick anything that there skill level makes gray to them.
2) put some random drift into movement.
3) limit the price you can sell something for on the AH to 10 times what a vendor would pay
4) don't allow the transfer of more then 100GP a time. Maybe a one time unlimited amount per month.
1. Makes having the mining/crafting skill trivial and severely limits players from gathering low or mid level resources. Want to mine that iron? Tough, drop your mining skill and level it back up. In turn, that will increase prices on the Auction house to ridiculous levels.
2. Node drifts underground, no one can harvest it.
3. Vendors pay very little compared to what demand will bring for an item. Plus, putting artificial boundaries on prices can easily destabilize the economy.
4. It's been a couple years since I've played WoW, but even then, there were a lot of items/services that would gross well over 100 gold. Now that the level cap is 70 and flying mounts cost a bagilion gold, I'm sure the value of gold in WoW has only gone down (meaning higher prices all around).
I liked the ideas at first, but as I thought about the game mechanics, realized they would only frustrate Blizzard's customers.
I'd prefer it based on logic more than anything else. But legislation and logic are mutually exclusive.
When you compare the same jobs, same qualifications, same experience, same competency and same working hours, there is no meaningful difference between male and female salaries.
At my last job I, and about every other man, was overlooked for positions and raises for women that had less education than, less experience and less seniority. Sure, it might be better on average. But in certain industries, it hurts to be a man, and there's no affirmative action group for us. Frankly, I don't want one. I find better opportunities elsewhere.
I read TFA as up to the point where people started screaming "unfair". After reading about the devices they're considering to prevent cheating (like blocking http traffic on the client machine), I don't think there's anything that a KVM and second computer wouldn't be able to get past. Just remember to keep the camera BEHIND the monitor.