A important thing i forgot: Do not think the people on wikipedia aways accept a fact you posted because you have sources, many people delete you work even you having reliable sources about
Corret, but the problem is if you found a realiable information and put then on war article, for example. Is the truth (supose this for this example), but is not acceptable for a bunch of north-americans and they delete your edit and will delete again if you try to correct, if you do not found a admin americancentric and he ban you. I see many articles with this problem, and I do not try to correct because is like begin a holywar.
Information will be only reliable if is printed and have Hawkings as author, for example? Oh god...
the problem is not how to source works, the problem is find a "source" acceptable to people like you (famous author, many citations on mainstream media, many printed books, maybe one Nobel?). And if the work is new? Who is the first, the chicken or the egg? I hope you got the idea.
Sorry, but on real word things do not work as you say. Have much articles with junk? Yes, they exist and we are gratefull for deleting then. But, what is a "junk" and what is not? many articles are usefull for many but you may think is junk, and you have the power to delete and the people do not have that power.
What is a "reliabe" citation for you, a entire book about, from ? Is because the "citation disease" from wikipedia i do not contribute to then anymore. Many usefull information have few citations or is a original work, is not "irrelevant" because lacks someone famous saying "you can trust on this".
Because people like you Wikipedia is a failure, no offense. As people writed below, you is not in position to judge if a information is usefull to all people, only for you. I maybe do not like one article on Wikipedia, but i will do not try to delete then because this.
Power corrupts. You give power to someone (into this case, the poder for delete), that someone will soon feel like God and have orgasms while using his power. Seriously, DO NOT GIVE ANY POWER to assholes.
Hahahahahaha, well... Is more difficult to control smoke (burning) than liquids (dissolving). Using the correct method is possible to get metals from dissolving then on strong acid and use precipitation or others reagents to get again the metal from solution. Will have flumes from acid, but the use of rigth acids maybe solve this problem (or make the reaction on a closed recipient)
Slashdot Mirror
Well, they can't steals clicks from a browser without clicks
And me? I will need to pay my house rent this month again :(
You don't closed all clips on storage, before we turn on the magnets? oh oh...
This remembers me "The ship will not hold captain!"
The MIB is rigth, we are on a giant glass sphere :)
And remember Opportunity: If Houston sends commands on metric units, ignore then for crist' sake! :)
A blu-ray still cost more than US$ 1500 on my country. Who will have enought money to buy one blu-ray player, 40" LCD TV and 5.1 sound?
A long, long, long tentacle solves the problem, simple!
Sorry, I do not understood your english (i do not live on EUA) :)
oh well... I know, i will not feed again the "citation trolls", I promess!
A important thing i forgot: Do not think the people on wikipedia aways accept a fact you posted because you have sources, many people delete you work even you having reliable sources about
Corret, but the problem is if you found a realiable information and put then on war article, for example. Is the truth (supose this for this example), but is not acceptable for a bunch of north-americans and they delete your edit and will delete again if you try to correct, if you do not found a admin americancentric and he ban you. I see many articles with this problem, and I do not try to correct because is like begin a holywar.
Information will be only reliable if is printed and have Hawkings as author, for example? Oh god...
the problem is not how to source works, the problem is find a "source" acceptable to people like you (famous author, many citations on mainstream media, many printed books, maybe one Nobel?). And if the work is new? Who is the first, the chicken or the egg? I hope you got the idea.
Sorry, but on real word things do not work as you say. Have much articles with junk? Yes, they exist and we are gratefull for deleting then. But, what is a "junk" and what is not? many articles are usefull for many but you may think is junk, and you have the power to delete and the people do not have that power.
You fall on "what is a credible source?" dilemma. On my country, the "official" educational sources IS NOT RELIABLE, for a example.
+5 is not enought for the post above...
What is a "reliabe" citation for you, a entire book about, from ? Is because the "citation disease" from wikipedia i do not contribute to then anymore. Many usefull information have few citations or is a original work, is not "irrelevant" because lacks someone famous saying "you can trust on this".
Because people like you Wikipedia is a failure, no offense. As people writed below, you is not in position to judge if a information is usefull to all people, only for you. I maybe do not like one article on Wikipedia, but i will do not try to delete then because this.
Mod +insigthtful the comment above, please
You cannot "trust" anymore on any article, specially if the article on question is about history e/or politics envolving EUA.
Power corrupts. You give power to someone (into this case, the poder for delete), that someone will soon feel like God and have orgasms while using his power. Seriously, DO NOT GIVE ANY POWER to assholes.
... for living on a country where DCMA is NOTHING...
Hahahahahaha, well... Is more difficult to control smoke (burning) than liquids (dissolving). Using the correct method is possible to get metals from dissolving then on strong acid and use precipitation or others reagents to get again the metal from solution. Will have flumes from acid, but the use of rigth acids maybe solve this problem (or make the reaction on a closed recipient)
Is a good question... Maybe using solvents e/or acids?
I think the good pirates of The PirateBay will be happy ho join on Google side
(from sea, real)Pirates != people