Slashdot Mirror


LHC Offline Until April 2009 (Or Longer)

rufey writes "The recent problems at the Large Hadron Collider will now keep it idle until spring 2009. The official press release is here. The LHC went offline due to a suspected failure in a superconducting connection, which overheated and caused around 100 of the LHC's super-cooled magnets to heat up by as much as 100 degrees. This resulted in the accidental release of a ton of liquid helium. The process required to repair the failed superconducting connection involves weeks of warming up the affected area from -456 degrees Fahrenheit to room temperature, and then several more weeks to cool it back down after the repair is made. The total amount of time to do this will spill over into CERN's scheduled winter maintenance/shutdown period, which is partly done to save money on electricity during the period of peak demand."

298 comments

  1. I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can wait till next spring for the world to end.

    1. Re:I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Basically what happened is when they fired it up, a giant ring - gate, if you will - appeared, and they don't have it under control yet.

    2. Re:I can wait by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, there will be another delay, then another, then another, until it goes live in 2012.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:I can wait by Bemopolis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must not be an American. I was hoping for total annihilation rather than having to live through the election.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    4. Re:I can wait by BradleyAndersen · · Score: 1

      I wish I had the mod points to move you up for this one. Bravo :)

    5. Re:I can wait by Barradrewda · · Score: 4, Funny

      Spring is in the air! Higgs bosons everywherrrrrrrre!

    6. Re:I can wait by Canislupus01 · · Score: 1

      HAHA! I was going to post the exact same thing. The Mayan calendar was SO RIGHT!

    7. Re:I can wait by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      Sucks to be one of the people who have already rang the Doom Bell and put the family suicide knife to use.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    8. Re:I can wait by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Nah, the world can't end, haven't you ever heard of the quantum suicide thought experiment? Clearly, this delay is just the first of many, eventually leading to the cancelation of the project. It's simply the most statistically likely thing that could happen that would avert the disaster.

    9. Re:I can wait by Abreu · · Score: 1

      But don't worry, they already killed the six multitentacular aliens/demons that managed to get through before they could shut the LHC down.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    10. Re:I can wait by tjstork · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must not be an American. I was hoping for total annihilation rather than having to live through the election.

      As a consolation prize, at least we get to watch the Palin / Biden debate. That's going to be a fun program of sure brain surgery, for sure.

      --
      This is my sig.
    11. Re:I can wait by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yeah I was wondering. Does it open the gates to the Dungeon Dimensions to let the creatures that live there in?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    12. Re:I can wait by icedcool · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gordon Freeman was on hand to take care of things.

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    13. Re:I can wait by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      No kidding, I'm in Portland it gets cold here in October. I'd rather die with a smile.

      Cue all "I'm in _______ you insensitive clod!" replies

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    14. Re:I can wait by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      But I can't! I've only got enough Mountain Dew for the next two weeks - I was sure we'd be dead by now!

    15. Re:I can wait by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is awesome, because every time they're about to fire it up we can use the "come on baby, tomorrow could be the end of the world... they're firing up the LHC..." line.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    16. Re:I can wait by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      "As a consolation prize, at least we get to watch the Palin / Biden debate. That's going to be a fun program of sure brain surgery, Don'chaknow."

      fixed.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    17. Re:I can wait by acedotcom · · Score: 0

      I hear there is cake.

      --
      they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
    18. Re:I can wait by Bemopolis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh yeah, that's gonna be great:

      MODERATOR: "Senator Biden, what qualifies you to be Vice President?"
      BIDEN: [answer redacted due to copyrights held by the estate of Neil Kinnock and the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome]
      MODERATOR: "Yes, yes. And you, Governor Pain, what qualifies you?"
      PALIN: "Nothing."[long pause] "But I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night!"
      Exeunt, pursued by a bear. With hair plugs and wearing lipstick.

      Which reminds me, I need to make sure that my wet bar is fully stocked.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    19. Re:I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes great movie

    20. Re:I can wait by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah I was wondering. Does it open the gates to the Dungeon Dimensions to let the creatures that live there in?

      Let's just say you'd better have your Young Men's Reformed-Cultists-of-the-Ichor-God Bel-Shamharoth Association dues paid up.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    21. Re:I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      per voi americani la fine del mondo arrivera' ancora prima. (translation for non-latin people: for You, Americans (inhabitants of 'United' States of North America), the world end will surely arrive before).

    22. Re:I can wait by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Nah, the world can't end, haven't you ever heard of the quantum suicide thought experiment? Clearly, this delay is just the first of many, eventually leading to the cancelation of the project. It's simply the most statistically likely thing that could happen that would avert the disaster.

      Why are you assuming we're in one of the lucky universes?

    23. Re:I can wait by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because if we were in one of the unlucky universes we wouldn't be having this conversation, that's what the thought experiment is. The idea goes like this, there are an infinate number of universes so anything that could even remotely happen will happen in one of them. Since you will only be aware of a universe if you are in it to experience it, you (as in yourself) will never die.

      Lets say I hook a nuclear bomb up to a detector that detects whether a single radioactive atom has decayed yet. After each half life of the particle, a new universe is created, one in which I am dead, and one in which I am alive. Needless to say, I'm not around to care about the universes that I am dead in. From my point of view, the bomb will never detonate because if it does than that cannot be my point of view any longer.

      Of course, this only works if the many worlds interpetation is correct, if it isn't then you will eventually die. Also, the argument only works for you. If someone else does the experiment they will die, at least according to your point of view. Luckily, anything that will destroy the world will also kill me, so the world is safe.

    24. Re:I can wait by jsalbre · · Score: 1

      For some reason whenever blackholes/wormholes/portals are mentioned in relation to the LHC I can't help but think of Phobos?

    25. Re:I can wait by dlmonkey · · Score: 1

      maybe they'll turn it on 4/20 ...

    26. Re:I can wait by morgauo · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, the election isn't that bad.

      It's the 4 years which follow that we can really do without!

    27. Re:I can wait by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Needless to say, I'm not around to care about the universes that I am dead in. From my point of view, the bomb will never detonate because if it does than that cannot be my point of view any longer.

      You can't pick which universe to care about because you only exist in one universe. When you die, that's it (unless your specific universe has an afterlife of course). You're correct that after death you won't be around to care about the universe you're dead in. But that's not because your point of view switches to the next universe. Your point of view ceases to exist exactly as it would if you had died in all universes (Mostly Harmless scenario).

    28. Re:I can wait by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      As a birthday present for Hitler? Why?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    29. Re:I can wait by RabidMoose · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which reminds me, I need to make sure that my wet bar is fully stocked.

      You kidding? I'm having a full-out PARTY for that debate. Hot dogs, wings, and beer all around. I expect it to be more entertaining than the combined entertainment value of the last year of MTV.
      Games to play: Write down your favorite dumb Palin quote of the night, toss in the hat, see which gets the most votes!
      Biden roulette! Hand out poker chips, put your bets down on "Yes/No" or "Gong" for each answer.

    30. Re:I can wait by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      The point is, any universe that I do care about, I'm alive in. I'm not saying that this is true, it's just a thought experiment that someone thought up of. Maybe the wikipedia article is better at explaining it than I am... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_suicide/

    31. Re:I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd better hope that the many worlds theory is false, because if it is true then over the eventual course of time you are overwhelmingly likely to live forever in a state of permanent disability.

    32. Re:I can wait by StrategicIrony · · Score: 1

      Uhm.....

      "God is dead" - Nietzsche, 1882

      "Nietzsche is dead" - Metabolic biochemistry, 1900 :-) not to quibble..... or anything...

    33. Re:I can wait by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      But cosmic rays in our atmosphere already do "worse" things than the LHC. Which means you can use that excuse anytime. And as the solar wind is the calmest we've ever seen it, there will be more cosmic rays. So just bring your cloud chamber to the bar and pick up the chicks.

    34. Re:I can wait by kalirion · · Score: 1

      From the wikipedia article

      "However, from the point of view of the non-dead copies of the experimenter, the experiment will continue running without his ceasing to exist, because at each branch, he will only be able to observe the result in the world in which he survives, and if many-worlds is correct, the surviving copies of the experimenter will notice that he never seems to die, therefore "proving" himself to be invulnerable to the gun mechanism in question, at least from his own point of view."

      And this makes perfect sense because of the part I bolded. There could also be a universe where the experimenter wins every single lottery jackpot (without any cheating involved). From his point of view, he can't lose. Doesn't help his alternate loser selves any. The fact that they're point of view doesn't end with losing the lottery makes absolutely no difference.

    35. Re:I can wait by MozeeToby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude, from one of my earlier comments...

      Since you will only be aware of a universe if you are in it to experience it, you (as in yourself) will never die.

      and

      From my point of view, the bomb will never detonate...

      and also

      Also, the argument only works for you. If someone else does the experiment they will die

      The difference between killing yourself off and winning the lottery is the anthropic principle, there is no you to observe that you are dead if you succeed in committing suicide. There is a you to observer that you lost the lottery. All universes that you observe, by definition, include you in them; all universes that you don't observe, by definition, don't include you in them.

    36. Re:I can wait by tenco · · Score: 1

      Lets say I hook a nuclear bomb up to a detector that detects whether a single radioactive atom has decayed yet.

      In Soviet Russia, quantuum experiments observe YOU!

    37. Re:I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually...what really happened is someone traveled back in time from the future and hacked into the LHC and secretly changed a parameter that allowed it to have the problems it faced, in order to prevent us from causing the world to end.

    38. Re:I can wait by Americium · · Score: 1

      And all you liberals wanted The aborted Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) in Texas. I'm sure that would have been achievable!?! Let's all be happy it was canceled.

    39. Re:I can wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always count on some douche to ruin a good laugh.

    40. Re:I can wait by daboochmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      Informative?!? This was rated as Informative?!? ./ has really gone downhill, the post doesn't even describe the acceptable payment methods, the actual cost of the dues, nothing. Sheesh ....

      --
      "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
    41. Re:I can wait by syousef · · Score: 1

      Which is awesome, because every time they're about to fire it up we can use the "come on baby, tomorrow could be the end of the world... they're firing up the LHC..." line. ...to which the girl responds, the large what you freaky nerd? Go away! I wouldn't even let you sniff my panties.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    42. Re:I can wait by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      "Let's do our own version of the Big Bang first"

    43. Re:I can wait by ciderVisor · · Score: 1
      --
      Squirrel!
    44. Re:I can wait by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      ./ has really gone downhill

      I must be new here, but why does everyone seem to call slashdot "./"? This isn't dotslash after all...

    45. Re:I can wait by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Governor Pain

      Didn't FTFY. It's funnier this way.

    46. Re:I can wait by kalirion · · Score: 1

      All universes that you observe, by definition, include you in them; all universes that you don't observe, by definition, don't include you in them.

      How many universes are you observing right now? That's right, one. When you die, your consciousness does not magically switch to the next universe. You cease to exist. Some one else, who may be identical to you, keeps on living. They are alive. You are not.

    47. Re:I can wait by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

      All I can say is, dyslexics of the world, untie.

      --
      "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  2. Hmmmmmm by rodney+dill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now where did that paper clip go?

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:Hmmmmmm by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      You don't closed all clips on storage, before we turn on the magnets? oh oh...

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:Hmmmmmm by AndersOSU · · Score: 5, Funny

      It looks like you're trying to repair a superconductor coolant loop. Would you like to:
      (a) vent all helium
      (b) order another 30 ton transformer
      (c) damn the torpedoes, lets make some black holes.

    3. Re:Hmmmmmm by jitterman · · Score: 2, Funny

      (d)Profit?

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  3. Damn by megamerican · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I'll have to wait even longer to welcome our new demonic overlords who were supposed to come out of the stargate that the LHC will create.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    1. Re:Damn by ivandavidoff · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed. I'm not an expert, but I believe "a suspected failure in a superconducting connection, which overheated and caused around 100 of the LHC's super-cooled magnets to heat up by as much as 100 degrees" is just fancy-talk for "we made a wormhole, but it wasn't big enough".

    2. Re:Damn by vertinox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now I'll have to wait even longer to welcome our new demonic overlords who were supposed to come out of the stargate that the LHC will create.

      Well, it looks like the best estimates will have the LHC running full collisions will be sometime in December, 2012.

      Hey wait a minute!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Damn by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      But it's buried.
      The wormholes can't establish a connection if a large object is inside the ring.

    4. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote Ron Paul 2012

    5. Re:Damn by jimmux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, if this actually happened do you think they would delay it beyond December 2012 just because the coincidence is too freaky to dismiss?

    6. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused... I thought Bill Gates already came though?

    7. Re:Damn by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Don't hold your breath. The Combine will fight them off.

  4. -456 degrees? by Squapper · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought the absolute zero was at -273...ah, damn americans!

    1. Re:-456 degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      -273C or -459F or 0K

    2. Re:-456 degrees? by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Informative

      I thought the absolute zero was at -273...ah, damn americans!

      I thought absolute zero was at 0...
      ah, damn humans.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    3. Re:-456 degrees? by ionix5891 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it must be the only country still using that system, why oh why? does it make everything sound bigger or something??

      since this is a european project the writers of this must have went out of their way to convert to Fahrenheit and dumben down the subject matter

    4. Re:-456 degrees? by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

      Google : -456 degrees fahrenheit in kelvin

      Result :(-456) degrees Fahrenheit = 2.03888889 kelvin

      The parent isn't informative or funny in any sense.

    5. Re:-456 degrees? by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 1

      What's more important: I thought this section was already warmed by 100 degrees? Why they have to cool it down again and then wait another X weeks to warm it back again to room temperature. WTF

    6. Re:-456 degrees? by rodney+dill · · Score: 2, Funny

      220, 221, whatever it takes.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    7. Re:-456 degrees? by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      which overheated and caused around 100 of the LHC's super-cooled magnets to heat up by as much as 100 degrees. This resulted in the accidental release of a ton of liquid helium

      More importantly is the exact science and measurements...

      ~100 were heated up over 100 degrees (K/F/C?), so were these 100 overheated? How about that 'a ton' of liquid helium, is that like.... a lot, or was it exactly 2,000 pounds?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    8. Re:-456 degrees? by iNaya · · Score: 1

      I thought it was at 0 K... Ah... damn luddies!

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    9. Re:-456 degrees? by Facetious · · Score: 1

      digitalderbs is a bitter old man.

      --
      Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
    10. Re:-456 degrees? by exley · · Score: 1

      since this is a european project the writers of this must have went out of their way to convert to Fahrenheit and dumben down the subject matter

      While I agree it's asinine that we still use things like English units (which even the English don't use anymore, for fuck's sake), how does doing a unit conversion "dumben down" the subject matter? And you said "dumben" on purpose, right?

    11. Re:-456 degrees? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay. I am from the US.
      Absolute zero is 0K!
      Stupid submitter and editor.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    12. Re:-456 degrees? by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay folks lets get it straight. The US isn't the only one that still doesn't use the metric system for everything.
      http://www.toyota.co.uk/cgi-bin/toyota/bv/generic_editorial.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@0174202331.1222276069@@@@&BV_EngineID=cccdadeffffejeicfngcfkmdfkidfgh.0&deepLink=YA3_Specification_new&nodiv=TRUE&fullwidth=TRUE&edname=specSheet_YA3&carModel=Yaris&imgName=bv/CarChapter/YA3/Imagery/YA3_spec.jpg&zone=Zone%20YARIS
      Here is a link to a Japanese car company selling a car in the UK.
      They give the fuel economy in MPG as well as KM per liter.
      Drives me crazy when I get UK motor cycle mag. The give the fuel economy in MPG and the fuel tank size in Liters!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:-456 degrees? by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      Exactly what went through my head. I had to convert with Google to figure out the temperature in a real unit of measure.

      Brrrrr... but not quite absolute brrr.

      What's required to clean up such a spill? Wouldn't that temperature make everything that approaches it become very brittle? Or very solid?

    14. Re:-456 degrees? by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 1

      Just because YOU didn't get the joke doesn't make it not funny.

    15. Re:-456 degrees? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about that 'a ton' of liquid helium, is that like.... a lot, or was it exactly 2,000 pounds?

      A ton is exactly 2240 lbs. Otherwise it wouldn't be a round number of hundredweights (or stones) and that would just be silly.

      Unless it's a metric ton, which is spelt "tonne", and is exactly 2204 and a bit lbs. Simple, no?

      Being scientists, the quantity in this instance was probably more or less a shedload.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    16. Re:-456 degrees? by JustKidding · · Score: 1

      That keeps irritating me, too. TFA is even in the "science" section! Can we at least agree to use the Kelvin scale for scientific articles?

      -456 Fahrenheit is (almost) equal to 2 Kelvin.

    17. Re:-456 degrees? by ThanatosMinor · · Score: 1

      I think what they meant to say was 3.42 R
      Doesn't everybody use Rankine?

    18. Re:-456 degrees? by systemeng · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my Chemical Engineering Prof who once said during a lecture, "Let's convert that unit to Pound Moles per degree Rankine, That will make it easier!"

    19. Re:-456 degrees? by raddan · · Score: 1

      I think we could justifiably counter that if you really care so much, you should use Kelvin. Celsius is not an SI base unit, even though its use has been tolerated somewhat in scientific literature.

    20. Re:-456 degrees? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      ~100 were heated up over 100 degrees (K/F/C?)

      Fortunately, they started out at such a low temperature that the components did not become KFC as a result.

    21. Re:-456 degrees? by Bob-taro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Drives me crazy when I get UK motor cycle mag. The give the fuel economy in MPG and the fuel tank size in Liters!

      Not only that, but British Gallons and U.S. gallons are different!

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    22. Re:-456 degrees? by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      1 tonne = 1000kg.

      Makes no sense, and that pisses me off. I much prefer my units being eighths of a unit made up of one twelfth of a unit made up of a third of a unit made up of 1/1760th of the largest practical unit.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    23. Re:-456 degrees? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep that is why the same car with the same engine gets better mileage in the EU than the US. Often they really don't.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:-456 degrees? by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      but British Gallons and U.S. gallons are different!

      Tell me about it! A pint of beer is smaller here. (US)

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    25. Re:-456 degrees? by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      but British Gallons and U.S. gallons are different!

      Tell me about it! A pint of beer is smaller here. (US)

      And weaker.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    26. Re:-456 degrees? by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      At last the Colonel's secret blend of 11 Herbs and Protons has been determined!

    27. Re:-456 degrees? by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      Yea, for the national brands, but with local breweries you can do much better.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    28. Re:-456 degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you gotta be accepting of our culture!

    29. Re:-456 degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the absolute zero was at -273...ah, damn americans!

      Damn americans?
      Who built this LHC?
      EU Technology peaked at the baguette!

    30. Re:-456 degrees? by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Yes sorry, it was a tired jibe.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    31. Re:-456 degrees? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      I thought the absolute zero was at -273...ah, damn american medias!

      FTFY
      I'm an american and a scientist (SI units please, kthxbi). I frequently confuse my friends and family, and they me, with our conflicting units. I still have problems converting my brain between ounces, pounds, gallons, feet, and grams, liters, meters, libraries of congress.

    32. Re:-456 degrees? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was the other way around. It's fun telling people you are longer than 16... centimeters.

    33. Re:-456 degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's news for nerds. nobody uses farenheiht in science. it's either Celsius or Kelvin. if you dont understand those systems, hand in your geek card and GTFO

    34. Re:-456 degrees? by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      most metric geeks are fine with Kelvin, since Celsius uses the exact same scale, just with 0 offset by 276. simple arithmetic you could do in your head. compare that to Fahrenheit where you have to add/subtract 459.67 and multiply/divide by 5/9 (depending which direction you're converting)

      --
      TIAEAE!
    35. Re:-456 degrees? by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      You mean the largest practical unit according to an 18th century farmer, don't you?

    36. Re:-456 degrees? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Why they have to cool it down again and then wait another X weeks to warm it back again to room temperature. WTF

      Um, because matter tends to change dimension with temperature, and thermal shock can break things? Dunno, I could be wrong here.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    37. Re:-456 degrees? by antiseptic_poetry · · Score: 1

      And colder.

    38. Re:-456 degrees? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Or - in my case - almost exactly half a '95 Jaguar XJ12

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    39. Re:-456 degrees? by JakartaDean · · Score: 1

      A ton is exactly 2240 lbs. Otherwise it wouldn't be a round number of hundredweights (or stones) and that would just be silly. Unless it's a metric ton, which is spelt "tonne", and is exactly 2204 and a bit lbs. Simple, no? Being scientists, the quantity in this instance was probably more or less a shedload.

      Well, 2240 lbs. is a long ton. A short ton is only 2000 lbs. Isn't this a great system?

      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
  5. Not Really by mfh · · Score: 1

    They are already here, and in positions of power around the world. Their reinforcements, however, will be late.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Not Really by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      They are already here, and in positions of power around the world. Their reinforcements, however, will be late.

      So this is our chance! W00t! Get them!

      Of course, nuking them from orbit is the only way to be sure. And we thought the real estate market was bad now...

      Handyman Special! Nice view, very low rads... Guaranteed to be the last home you ever buy!

    2. Re:Not Really by Abreu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Naw, its too late.

      Turns out McCain is Kang and Obama is Kodos.

      You know its useless to vote for a third candidate.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:Not Really by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The problem with "third candidates" is that you still don't get to vote for Lisa. The best you can hope or is Ralph, or Lyle Lanley.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  6. I see this before... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    This remembers me "The ship will not hold captain!"

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  7. Well by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

    That sucks.

  8. Didn't they kinda predict this? by dangerz · · Score: 1

    I remember reading an article on here talking about a theory in which a particle from the future could come back and shut things down. I guess they could use that theory for any kind of downtime though.

    --
    The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
    - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Didn't they kinda predict this? by Extremus · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, if this is correct, we now know that it will work.

    2. Re:Didn't they kinda predict this? by nx · · Score: 1

      Well, there's this paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1919

      --
      L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers.
  9. Not the end of the world by us7892 · · Score: 1

    Great, so we won't have to hear more stories about the end of the world caused by black holes. Well, at least until the spring anyway.

    This breakdown is probably just the beginning of a series of breakdowns. A year from now everyone will be complaining about the huge price tag on this thing that has never been 100% operational.

    1. Re:Not the end of the world by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Funny

      A year from now everyone will be complaining about the huge price tag on this thing that has never been 100% operational.

      It's the Windows Vista of supercolliders.

    2. Re:Not the end of the world by Spazztastic · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd rather it be the Vista then the Millennium Edition...

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    3. Re:Not the end of the world by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're being unfair, but they have a plan.

      They're going to rename it the Large Mojave Collider and prove that its just bad press that is making them look bad.

    4. Re:Not the end of the world by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Oh, I think this large Hadron collider will be fully operational by the time your rebel friends arrive.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    5. Re:Not the end of the world by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Don't go crying all over the web because you don't have the proper hardware to run the super-collider. Have you tried turning off the safety measures to speed it up any?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    6. Re:Not the end of the world by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      You're being unfair, but they have a plan.

      They're going to rename it the Large Mojave Collider and prove that its just bad press that is making them look bad.

      It's about time. 'Collisions of nothing' might have worked for Seinfeld, but it doesn't have enough impact for particle physics.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
  10. The should contact... by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

    ... the TV show Fringe. They turned off an MRI instantaneously and pull a guy out of it on last nights episode.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:The should contact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh...Thats where your incredulism comes in on that show?

      It wasnt the "ghost network telepathy caused by Iridium in their brains?" Or the fact they use latin to transmit some of the time but english at others?

      That show is pure fluff its so bad on science i think it actually hurts smart people.

    2. Re:The should contact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty sure its close to lagitimate... the whole purpose of the emergency helium release on helium mri machines is to quickly and immediately bring the machine out of superconducting state. (or at least this was the claim when I asked about the big red button when i had an mri done, was also told it was horribly expensive to replace the helium when/if the release gets used)

      the magnets themselfs are enclosed and insulated otherwise the person in the mri would be pretty cold pretty quick!

    3. Re:The should contact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A supercooled MRI unit being able to cause pain for someone inside the unit, but not just feet away, was the only pseudo-science from Fringe that was 'on-topic' to this thread. I'm still waiting for some astute moderator to fail to make the connection that MRI's too, are superconductors and mark my original post 'off-topic'

  11. Now what do I do? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I spent all my money over the last 6 months on alcohol and parties, secure in the knowledge that the world would come to an end this October when the LHC came up to full power.

    This is unacceptable. I demand they destroy the world now.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Now what do I do? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      And me? I will need to pay my house rent this month again :(

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:Now what do I do? by AioKits · · Score: 1

      Tough man, I'm keeping the couch you sold me for $20.

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    3. Re:Now what do I do? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...spent all my money...secure in the knowledge that the world would come to an end this October

      Yeah, you and all the banks!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    4. Re:Now what do I do? by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      Don't worry... what they didn't report was the cause of the leak -- and why no matter how much caulk they put over it the hole just won't go away. In fact, it seems to grow with every attempt to seal it.

    5. Re:Now what do I do? by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      I guess its back to work on the Illudium Pu-36 Explosive Space Modulator.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    6. Re:Now what do I do? by neoform · · Score: 2, Funny

      This reminds me of a friend of mine, who on his deathbed told me:

      All my life, I spent 90% of my money on hookers and alcohol.. and I wasted the other 10%.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    7. Re:Now what do I do? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given the recent stock crisis, that was probably the best thing you could have done with your money anyway.

    8. Re:Now what do I do? by nbert · · Score: 1

      Seems like your friend cited George Best

    9. Re:Now what do I do? by dexmachina · · Score: 1

      Too bad Bush seems to have been following the same plan. If you think /you/ feel like an idiot now...

    10. Re:Now what do I do? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      I spent all my money over the last 6 months on alcohol and parties, secure in the knowledge that the world would come to an end this October when the LHC came up to full power.

      Yeah me too. You'd think I would have learned my lesson when I did the same thing in late 1999 preparing for Y2K...

    11. Re:Now what do I do? by caluml · · Score: 1

      Or his friend was George Best, you insensitive clod!

  12. Projected start date by Cor-cor · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe with all the problems they're having, the actual date when the high-energy collisions begin will be December 2012.

    1. Re:Projected start date by Spatial · · Score: 1

      What's the next doomsday fantasy after the 2012 one, anyway? Saying "I told you so" to the credulous has been a fine tradition for all of history and I'm happy to continue the practise. I need to be prepared!

    2. Re:Projected start date by Buradorii · · Score: 1

      Probably Tuesday, January 19, 2038. Thats when, at 03:14:07, 32-bit time will overflow back to Jan 1 1970.

      --
      You can live your life in a thousand ways, but it call comes down to that single day...
    3. Re:Projected start date by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Fine with me. At that point I won't mind being 68 years younger...

  13. -456 F? What is that? by Protoslo · · Score: 1

    Say something meaningful--the magnets were about 2 degrees Kelvin.

  14. A ton? by philspear · · Score: 1

    Do they actually mean there was a metric ton of Liquid Helium released, or just a lot? I mean, any liquid helium spilled, even jus a measly ounce, to me seems like a big deal considering how expensive and, well, cold it is. A whole ton? Seriously, is this an actual figure or is it just an exageration? Or is it even an understatement? I really have no idea.

    1. Re:A ton? by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The LHC cooling circuit has something like 400 tons of helium in it.
      One ton missing sounds reasonable.

      The cold doesnt matter, btw. Liquid helium has a really low heat capacity and evaporation enthalpy. A dewar full of liquid nitrogen spilled will do much more damage than 10 times the amount of helium, even if the helium temperature is lower.

      And helium is not THAT expensive. At least compared to the other costs.

      A physicists analogy is that a LN2 costs as much as cheap beer, while L He as much as good whiskey, per volume... (I once used 2000l of liquid helium in a single week because of a faulty magnet that couldnt be replaced during beamtime. Although that was of course recaptured. I hope they have options to do that in the LHC cave, too, even though the initial containment was breached)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:A ton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They really meant 'tun' of helium (man page found here: http://www.gsp.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=4&topic=tun).

    3. Re:A ton? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      >I mean, any liquid helium spilled, even jus a measly ounce, to me seems like a big deal considering how expensive and, well, cold it is

      According to a LHC staffer blog, they capture the helium and reuse...

    4. Re:A ton? by philspear · · Score: 1

      A physicists analogy is that a LN2 costs as much as cheap beer, while L He as much as good whiskey, per volume

      Well... I usually purchase whiskey by the half-ton at costco, so that really puts it into perspective!

    5. Re:A ton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psst ! hamster dance party at the lhc, bring friends !

    6. Re:A ton? by richard.cs · · Score: 1

      At my university (Exeter, UK) we were told that liquid nitrogen costs about the same as milk, liquid helium 4 was about the same as supermarket wine, and liquid helium 3 was a similar price to vintage whiskey. They run their own liquefiers for He4 and nitrogen there though.

  15. Coolant leak? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Or something more sinister? Did they make a blackhole? Are they desperately trying to contain it before it destroys the earth?

    Although really, if my ST:NG watching is any indication, coolant leaks are bad mojo in and of themselves. And that would explain why I was told to put on a red shirt this morning.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Coolant leak? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Run a level 2 diagnostic!

    2. Re:Coolant leak? by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      They should reconfigure the Graviton emitters to emit a Tachyon pulse. Or to paraphrase Fry: "Like a balloon... and something bad happens!"

    3. Re:Coolant leak? by caluml · · Score: 1

      Just reboot it, and when it gets to the POST stage, press F2, and then you can set the Liquid Helium values.
      Don't forget to Save and Exit, not just Exit.

  16. Until april? by Leafheart · · Score: 1

    Holy FSM! More or less 31 weeks of downtime. Anyone have more details about the warming up and cooling process? I mean, how efectivly is it done and how long it take for each sector?

    --
    --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    1. Re:Until april? by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a guy running back and forth down the tunnel with a bucket of warm water...

  17. Ouch by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I understand things were going well - then there was this 'big bang'....

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Ouch by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      "Event-horizons occur from time to time that temporarily stop operations, for shorter or longer periods, especially during the early phases," said Cern physicist Peter Limon ; )

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    2. Re:Ouch by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Pictures or it didn't happen!

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  18. Save energy ? what the hell ? by unity100 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the BIGGEST and probably the most important experiment ever conceived is underway, and they are being left to think about saving energy ?

    if there is anything that world shouldnt be saving energy, if there is anything that needs to be subsidized by governments, this is it.

    because, this is IT. if the god particle is found, the smallest block of EXISTENCE will be found.

    im appalled how EU is not being of sufficient assistance in this. unbelievable.

    1. Re:Save energy ? what the hell ? by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Informative

      When they're using the kind of energy that knocks out country powergrids, then yes, it is a consideration.

    2. Re:Save energy ? what the hell ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> the smallest block of EXISTENCE will be found

      There's no such thing.

    3. Re:Save energy ? what the hell ? by unity100 · · Score: 0

      that's what im talking about. eu, the neighboring governments of switzerland, even switzerland have funded a lot of things in the past.

      cant they arrange the kind if supply to feed this experiment ? no need to answer - they can. and thats what im asking for.

    4. Re:Save energy ? what the hell ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      you dont know if there is, or there isnt, until this experiment is completed.

    5. Re:Save energy ? what the hell ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I do know that there is no such thing as the smallest block of existence; it just hasn't been proven yet.

      In many if not most instances, intuition leads the way and is only later backed up by experimentation.

  19. Re:-456 F? What is that? by Nesomir · · Score: 3, Informative

    Say something meaningful--the magnets were about 2 degrees Kelvin.

    you mean 2 Kelvin (since it is an absolute scale)

  20. Re:-456 F? What is that? by us7892 · · Score: 1

    Hey old chap, can tell me the length in barleycorn's for this collider?

  21. Back-of-the-envelope costs by digitalderbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last time I checked, LHe was about $5 USD a liter. A metric ton is 1000kg, and LHe's density is 0.125g/ml (wikipedia), which amounts to 8000 liters or about 40k. Considering that He is non-renewable, leaking out of the atmosphere, hopefully they were able to reclaim and recompress it.

    1. Re:Back-of-the-envelope costs by gnick · · Score: 1

      Non-renewable? Hogwash. We already have the technology to create He. It's just that it takes a lot of energy and we have to do it 1 atom at a time. Of course, that's probably only on a par with trying to recover it from the atmosphere...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:Back-of-the-envelope costs by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      All we need to do is get Fusion working and we have all the He we want!

      --
      -SaNo
    3. Re:Back-of-the-envelope costs by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      You can't recover He when it escapes, as it flies out into space, hence non-renewable.

      Helium escape from the terrestrial atmosphere: The ion outflow mechanism
      http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1996/95JA02208.shtml

    4. Re:Back-of-the-envelope costs by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that 40K is nothing compared to the budget of the thing. That might be their daily electricity bill, for all I care (and I suspect I am not that far off)

    5. Re:Back-of-the-envelope costs by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      crap... why didn't we think of that before. Let me check my watch. Yeah, I've got some time before dinner. I'll see what I can throw together.

    6. Re:Back-of-the-envelope costs by fotbr · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't getting it to work, we've done that. It just happens really, really quickly. The part you need to work on is a collection apparatus that can survive the bang.

  22. Houston we have a problem by juanitobanana · · Score: 1

    They must be calling the black hole firefighters. as everybody knows this stuff grows slowly: http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/science_technology/black+hole+missing+link+found/2459102 "super-massive black holes were thought to grow slowly". Way to go, that'll learn us to put such a facility in switzerland where suicide rates are so high.

  23. Ton of Helium by necro81 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A ton of helium! What's the big deal? That's, like, way lighter than a ton of air!

    [I'm being facetious about the weights, but in terms of cost, losing a ton of helium is freakin' expensive]

    1. Re:Ton of Helium by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Problem was that when the leak happened all the engineers and safety guys were working hard to fix the leak... Then someone finally spoke and sounded like Mikey mouse. Giggling started... then all out laughter as others tried talking.. they were laughing so hard that most of the helium leaked out.

      Helium, it's just too damn funny.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Ton of Helium by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      wait wait wait... if you lost a ton of helium, wouldn't that mean you gain weight?

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  24. We know. You can tell from the LHC cyro status. by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look at the LHC cyro status for sector 3-4. Average magnet temperature is now at 70K, and slowly creeping up to room temperature. Notice the expanded vertical scale on the graph. Compare with the other sectors, holding with liquid helium at 1.9K.

    Warmup is slow. Cooldown is slower. Several kilometers of pipe and a hundred or so magnets are involved.

    It's not that bad, though. It looks like they won't have to take magnets out of the tunnel for rewinding. That's a huge job. This is just a slow one.

    They can warm up or chill down sector 3-4 during the shutdown period. The rest of the system would normally be cooled during shutdown anyway.

    1. Re:We know. You can tell from the LHC cyro status. by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Is there a specific rate at which warmup/cooldown needs to take place to prevent material failure? Why not use a heat pump or some sort of heat exchanger to warm up the section faster?

  25. Re:-456 F? What is that? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

    Quit complaining about Fahrenheit, we could have said 2.7 Rankine.

  26. Re:-456 F? What is that? by Protoslo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I could claim that I was born before the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures and exhort you to get off my lawn...but I'd be lying.

  27. The future is now! by DerCed · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome the Higgs bosons from the future that successfully interfere with the LHC in the present!

  28. Sofucation? At least I'll sound funny... by An+Anal.+Chemist · · Score: 1

    Yikes, I'd be more worried about the liquid helium being released than making a black hole. You'd die awfully quick if your precious oxygen is replaced with helium.

    1. Re:Sofucation? At least I'll sound funny... by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      but you'll sound hilarious. Wilhelm scream FTW!

    2. Re:Sofucation? At least I'll sound funny... by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Which makes me wonder -- shouldn't they have oxygen masks available around the accelerator in case something like this happens?

    3. Re:Sofucation? At least I'll sound funny... by sash · · Score: 1

      Which makes me wonder -- shouldn't they have oxygen masks available around the accelerator in case something like this happens?

      Not only there are some of those, but most of all everybody carries a personal breathing apparatus, when they go down in the experiment pits or in the tunnel. You wouldn't want tens of people to fight over a few masks.
        If you work in any experimental area at CERN, you must pass some safety course, and if you work in the LHC underground areas there is further specific training do to.
        In any case, when the beam is on,which is when the risk of this kind of failure is highest, nobody can stay in the tunnel because of the radiation levels.

  29. -450who? by IorDMUX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, I'm a born and raised American, and -453 Fahrenheit means nothing to me. Even us Americans use Celsius for science. If I read a temperature outside of what the weatherman could report, then a Fahrenheit measurement is just another number that I have to convert before it will mean something. (Let's see... being a former Clevelander, the weatherman range would be from about -30 to 110 F.)

    Please. If it's science, give us our 'degrees C'.

    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    1. Re:-450who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The measurement should have been in Kelvin, anyway. Perhaps the author isn't a science guy.

    2. Re:-450who? by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      I'd like to thank my fellow American IorDMUX for boldly using "us Americans" as a sentence subject. Us Americans will live free of the repressive constraints of English grammar!

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    3. Re:-450who? by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps the author was trying to make the article a little more reader-friendly. Kelvin would mean nothing to the average Joe, but F or C does, and they aren't so hot on conversions. Whereas a scientific-minded person has no trouble converting to a format they understand (although, apparently, not without complaining). ;)

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    4. Re:-450who? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm a born and raised American, and -453 Fahrenheit means nothing to me.

      I'm sure Sarah Palin will tell ya all about it if you ask nicely.

    5. Re:-450who? by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 1

      Duh, it's the temperature at which books freeze.

  30. Party time by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe with all the problems they're having, the actual date when the high-energy collisions begin will be December 2012.

    That actually is appropriate, though probably not in the sense that P means. The Mesoamerican calandar that 'ends' in 2012 is just the end of a chunk of a calendar, to be followed by another chunk, and another, etc. It is like New Year's Eve for us; the end of a cycle and an excuse to party. 2012 is just an excuse to party, Mayan style, ripping the hearts out of human sacrifices or however they celebrate it.
    When the first collisions happen, that will be grounds for partying also.

    1. Re:Party time by RockWolf · · Score: 1

      In the same manner, I'm sure. The webcams at the LHC will be an interesting watch.

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  31. they blowed it up by CHRONOSS2008 · · Score: 1

    maybe it sent particles thorugh space time and they are tugging some giant galactic cluster toward it and in a giant wormhole it will all pop back here. /me gets some popcorn ( not from a movie theatre )

  32. Spare magnets by Plazmid · · Score: 1

    It sure is a good thing that they have 30-40 spare magnets.

  33. Shouldn't take THAT long by bugeaterr · · Score: 2, Funny

    To upgrade to XP.

    Turns out one of the new particles forgot to get certified Vista-ready.

    Not naming any names here (I'm looking at you muon-antineutrino!)

    1. Re:Shouldn't take THAT long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non apropos? Sense no you make. Statement retry but sense make?

  34. I know what caused the leak... by cpotoso · · Score: 1

    It was a mini black hole that eat through the insulation! No question about it... now it is busy devouring the Alps, then Europe (sell sell sell all your Euros, now!). It will then gradually expand and eat Wall Street (wait! it has happened already!). The world will come to an end before they can fix this machine.

  35. Time travelers keep breaking it... by feyhunde · · Score: 1
    --
    I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
  36. Idle until spring!?!?? by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    idleispants!!!!!!

  37. They will trun it back the day after the CUBS win by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    They will trun it back the day after the CUBS win it all.

  38. No by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    That does not suck. But the alternative...

    Ok, I've made a LHC black hole joke. I couldn't resist... Shame on me :(

  39. You're no kind of scientist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Real scientists use SI metric base units. And as everyone knows, the SI unit for temperature is... *drumroll*...

    KELVINS.

    1. Re:You're no kind of scientist. by cgaertner · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, *real* scientists use natural units and measure temperature in eV - like everything else ;)

    2. Re:You're no kind of scientist. by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      No, *real* scientists use natural units and measure temperature in eV - like everything else ;)

      Technically they can't do that at the moment because there are 13 or so separate fundamental constants of nature. Although, I suppose that won't stop some of them writing c = PI = 1, 1 = any identity (irregular matrix, tensor or otherwise), leaving off vector squiggles when there are 2 possibilities (you're supposed to know which one), and letting the reader keep track of this nonsense.

      Just imagine what would happen if they finally unify all the forces and connect those now independent constants of nature after the CERN experiment... and the guy who did it had some ridiculous last name or came up with some ludicrous unit (continuing the tradition of strings, beauty quarks, p-branes, etc).

    3. Re:You're no kind of scientist. by cgaertner · · Score: 1

      Technically they can't do that at the moment because there are 13 or so separate fundamental constants of nature.

      You're right. But normally, you just set the one's to 1 which are relevant to your calculations - which often include the speed of light and the reduced Planck's constant (seeing a length given in 1/GeV is a bit strange at first ;)). Good candidates are the Boltzman constant (if you do thermodynamics), the Gravitaional constant and the elementary charge.

      Although, I suppose that won't stop some of them writing c = PI = 1, 1 = any identity (irregular matrix, tensor or otherwise), leaving off vector squiggles when there are 2 possibilities (you're supposed to know which one), and letting the reader keep track of this nonsense.

      I heard rumors of setting 2PI=1, but have yet to see that done...

      Just imagine what would happen if they finally unify all the forces and connect those now independent constants of nature after the CERN experiment... and the guy who did it had some ridiculous last name or came up with some ludicrous unit (continuing the tradition of strings, beauty quarks, p-branes, etc).

      Yeah, a lot of physical naming schemes seem to come straight from Terry Pratchett novels...

  40. Re:-456 F? What is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean 2 Kelvin (since it is an absolute scale)

    Or, for the rest of us, 3.0025 Libraries of Congress.

  41. Radioactive Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the world is safe again... But... for how long?

  42. Taking Longer by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 1

    I bet the LHC won't be fully operational until 2012. I'd say around December.

    --
    It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
  43. Re:Hmmmmmm Funny that you should mention by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Troll

    the paperclip (alluding to magnetism)... My initial thoughts are that this is a successful (achieved, whether or not the victims want it to be a) sabotage act. We already heard that crackers broke in but were contained or blocked. Often, thefts and heists are facilitated by insiders. I wonder which (if any) internal "agents" is a mole. Even just yesterday, having read the link about acts of internet sabotage/cyber attacks:

    http://net-security.org/secworld.php?id=6554

    I wouldn't be surprised if a US or US-sympathetic student or agent working on the scientific teams helped map the security protocols/topology and insert the mole. Why dare slam the US? Well, because we CONSTANTLY are bombarded with what appear to be outrageous lies about *China* constantly attacking (when "probing" might be the better description?) US military sites. The report/link on the attacks indicates that China's currently interested or succeeding in planting trojans/bots/mechanisms in less secure academic facilities. And, the US' Semiconducting super collider never took off:

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94481272

    So, who knows with unassailable certainty that the US (aside from risking losing access to treasured scientific Data from the LHC) wouldn't have tinkered with the idea of delaying or sabotaging the LHC? NOBODY! But, there could be other culprits, to be fair...

    OTOH, if there are any Chinese nationals as scientists/workers there, i doubt they'd have a motivation for doing it. It's not as if they have a domestic collider program. They're busy with the ship construction, manufacturing, and space programs - and, i suppose, - if Crawl Street implodes, they will try to advance Shanghai or other places as financial centers, inviting in many of the brightest being purged or dropped from New York. And, who's to SAY (with certitude and factuality) that the US WILL AND SHALL remain the financial processing center of the world? NO ONE can.

    Anyway, I bet any overheating or tube/ring failures will end up being reported as unfortunate mechanical failure. Even if it is sabotage, it'll be kept hushed to not help any attackers know for certain that THEIR act was the one that did in the LHC and deflated the short-lived jubilation felt over activation of the LHC...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  44. Delayed until 2012 by walruz · · Score: 1

    I bet there'll be more delays and it will be fully functional on Dec 21, 2012.. By that time, i'll have enough canned food, bottles of fresh water and a little boat, sailing in the south atlantic :D

    --
    ATH++
    1. Re:Delayed until 2012 by east+coast · · Score: 1

      By that time, i'll have enough canned food, bottles of fresh water and a little boat, sailing in the south atlantic :D

      Really? Thanks for the info. Now I know where I can get tons of canned food, bottles of fresh water and a little boat for just the cost of a 45 ACP round.

      Seriously, ammo is the best investment of your survivalist dollar.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Delayed until 2012 by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Seriously, ammo is the best investment of your survivalist dollar.

      Survivalists all think short-term. --So yeah, ammunition is effective if you're planning to out-live everybody in some lonely, Mad Max hole in the ground.

      Ammunition runs out, and so does canned food. They are both short term. Only DNA has a chance of remaining to carry on. The real survivors will be those who collect knowledge, aren't afraid of work, and know how to love their neighbors. And heck, if you want to come and stand on our wall with your rifle to help dissuade the black-leather lunatics in their dune-buggies, then there's positive community, a warm bed and a spot around the fire in it for you. --Unless you're the sort to shoot people for their food, in which case you can just keep moving along. Enjoy the winter and your cabin fever.

      When lots of people have weapons, the rules of decent social conduct will continue, and the necessity for communal support will never go away.

      -FL

    3. Re:Delayed until 2012 by east+coast · · Score: 1

      When lots of people have weapons, the rules of decent social conduct will continue, and the necessity for communal support will never go away.

      Ha! We don't have "decent social conduct" today.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:Delayed until 2012 by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Ha! We don't have "decent social conduct" today.

      Sure we do. Evil certainly exists in pockets as it always will, but I don't have anybody gunning for my tuna fish. --Or even for my wallet when it comes right down to it. Crassness exists in much larger quantities, so perhaps that's what you mean.

      -FL

  45. Lies!! by Quantus347 · · Score: 1

    My guess is that the first collision will take place this winter while it's supposedly shut down.

    THEY don't want all the publicity when they start it up.

    THEY want to control whatever powerful new technologies may come out of it.

    THEY killed Elvis and Emilia Earhart, and hide the secret to cold fusion and the low-fat cheeseburger.

    --
    Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
    1. Re:Lies!! by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the first collision will take place this winter while it's supposedly shut down.

      Indeed. I don't buy this "peak demand" thing for a moment; surely it'll be cheaper to cool it down during Winter!

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  46. Read the article by Technopaladin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if anyone has considered the dangers of that much free helium. If there was a horrible accident at LHC if they called anyone their voices would be too high pitched to take seriously.

  47. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by Legion_SB · · Score: 3, Funny

    They will trun it back the day after the CUBS win it all.

    Against Miami?
    Yeah. Who would've thought? 100 to 1 shot! I wish I could go back to the beginning of the season, put some money on the Cubs.

    --
    'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  48. LHC Joke of the Day by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: What did one CERN Scientist say to the other after they collided their first particles?

    A: What's the matter?

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    1. Re:LHC Joke of the Day by hotchai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Think of this conversation *after* they inhaled all that Helium! All jokes are more funny in He-induced voice.

  49. deja vu by jcgam69 · · Score: 1

    In this story a superconducting supercollider had a similar accident, although the results were much different. Good read.

  50. Good alternate use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, until they get this thing running again, they can rent the place out as the ultimate underground skating rink.

  51. Quantum Immortality At Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propose in all the other parallel universes, the LHC is activated and destroyed humanity. Thus the one *I* am in, the LHC will never work.

    1. Re:Quantum Immortality At Work by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      I propose in all the other parallel universes, the LHC is activated and destroyed humanity. Thus the one *I* am in, the LHC will never work.

      Or it will work, but only give bland results.

      Hm. Now there's a thought. --Your safety and continued existence requires that certain otherwise possible realities never manifest. The very fact that you are aware forces the universe into a stable state so that you can remain aware.

      Might explain a great deal.

      Of course, in MY version of reality, you're just another Red Shirt. I'm sorry. I'm so, so sorry.

      -FL

  52. Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by blind+biker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hope the repairmen don't forget their gloves or screwdrivers in there.

    More seriously: the LHC wasn't designed with repairability/serviceability in mind, it seems. Before you mod me down: the proof is before our eyes!

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're not familiar with large scale industrial operations. Even a large boiler must be disabled for a week or so before reaching room temperature. You're not going to be able to bring that much material to such a low temperature quickly.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You are more than welcome to try working at near absolute zero... Warming/cooling safely TAKES TIME.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More seriously: the LHC wasn't designed with repairability/serviceability in mind, it seems. Before you mod me down: the proof is before our eyes!

      Yeah not like this is a huge, complex machine with high-energy components that when running operate at a few kelvin above absolute zero ... I mean they should just be able to walk in pop out the bad part and drop in a new one. It isn't like they have to worry about any thermal deformation, etc. issues or human safety when doing the work.

    4. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I know - in fact, I work with cryogenic plasma etching, and even though there the temperatures are not nearly as low as needed for superconductivity of the LHC coils, it still takes a long time to get it to work, or to warm it up for servicing. BUT... what I meant was: figure out a way to compartmentize the structure, so that only parts need to be warmed up, while the rest is termically insulated.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I understand that, but what I meant was: figure out a way to compartmentize the structure, so that only parts need to be warmed up, while the rest is termically insulated.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      big machines like this always need to have time to ramp up and down. Coal burning power plants take several hours to warm up and cool down, and those are fairly commonplace. It does not surprise me in the least that this massive thing takes so long.

    7. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It is - the issue is that the thing is just so huge! (and, you can't run it without all sections operational).

      If you look here, you can see that sector 3-4 is warm.. that's the compartment that was affected. Detailed graphs are available here.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by Ornedan · · Score: 1

      Oh, hey. That's exactly what they're doing.

      Research. Then, maybe, talk.

    9. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by Fumus · · Score: 1

      He's the rambo type.
      "Just give me a space suit, and where the fuck is it."

    10. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      The sectors in the LHC are huge. Perhaps too huge to be practical. I hope to be proven wrong, for two reasons: I am extremely interested in the outcome of some of those experiments. And also, some of my colleagues are working on detectors that will hopefully be used on the LHC, if it works reliably. For their sake, I hope the LHC will be reliable.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    11. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      As you said, those sectors in the LHC are huge. I knew there were a few, didn't know they were 8. The diameter of the LHC "main ring" (feel free to correct my untech terminology, but you know what I mean) is 27Km. Back of envelope calculation says that the length of one sector is about 10Km.

      So, perhaps too few sectors? I hope to be proven wrong, for two reasons: I am extremely interested in the outcome of some of those experiments. And also, some of my colleagues are working on particle detectors that will hopefully be used on the LHC, if it works reliably. For their sake, I hope the LHC will be reliable. These guys go to CERN every now and then, but didn't yet get to do a bikeride in the LHC. I so effing envy them...

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    12. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by m50d · · Score: 2, Insightful
      More seriously: the LHC wasn't designed with repairability/serviceability in mind, it seems.

      I doubt that; rather it was designed as serviceably as *possible*. Which isn't very given how cold and how freakin' big it needs to be. The whole thing is an exercise in pushing the boundaries; it's hard enough designing it to work at all.

      --
      I am trolling
    13. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by sash · · Score: 1

      Dividing into more sections would have increased the complexity and costs even further, and it would not really have increased the reliability - more piping and cabling, more things which can fail.
        In any case, even if each single magnet was separate, it would still take weeks for warm-up and cool-down, so you would not gain much.

    14. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAMN!!!! I was waiting for this to collide. I cant wait untill 2009. This is too exiting... :o
      fuck. I hope they fix it and can run it in the winter after all!! GO CERN!! //a guy from sweden.

      Thanks

    15. Re:Several weeks to warm up and cool down? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't know why there's a bulkhead every 10km. Would they need more helium-circulation equipment for every barrier? Pumps and tanks, etc?

      It may have been a cost reduction or design simplification (more pumps, more chance for a pump to fail and take the system down for weeks).

      I'm just going to trust that people a hell of a lot smarter than me, knew what they were doing.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  53. weeks of warming up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easier to run the same test again, so the magnet-thingies warm up themselves in a single day.

    1. Re:weeks of warming up? by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 1

      It's easier to run the same test again, so the magnet-thingies warm up themselves in a single day.

      Yeah, just dump in a bin of photons and electrons instead of protons and bounce those around section 3-4. Should warm up nicely.

  54. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, the world ended when the Red Sox won it all, it's just that nobody noticed.

  55. Re:Hmmmmmm Funny that you should mention by Vagnaard · · Score: 0

    Wow, you got issues. Have you checked for spies in your microwave lately?

    --
    He had a baseball bat, and I was tied to a chair. Pissing him off was the smart thing to do. - Max Payne
  56. This sucks by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

    This is terrible. I may actually have to consider who I'm voting for in the upcoming US Presidential elections.... I DEMAND THAT THEY RESTART THE LHC... IMMEDIATLY!!!

  57. don't forget. by tjstork · · Score: 0, Redundant

    (d) PROFIT!!

    --
    This is my sig.
  58. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by drolli · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am dissappointed. We are on slashdot. Please say instead
    "The results will be evalutaed using GNU/Hurd"
    or "The operators could finish a round of DNF in the breaks" or "a microsoft linux running on phantom game consoles is used as a thin client operating system" etc...

    NO Sports, please!

  59. C is for pussies by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Give me my degrees Rankine!

    And then I'll have a side of Kelvin too. Thank you.

  60. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But seriously, what about space suits? They allow people to survive in absolute 0. Why can't they be used?

  61. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

    Cubbies i thought...or am I wrong?

  62. Disappointed by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I thought they could, like, warp the firmament or woof the continuum or something. Can't they fix it yesterday?

  63. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by treeves · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? Sheeesh, lighten up mods. Well, one mod in particular, I suppose.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  64. Torchwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah! Bloody Torchwood.

  65. Black Hole of Funding... by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

    ... it just keeps sucking down more money in repairs!

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

    (To the humor-impaired, that was only a joke, not a criticism)

    --
    Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
  66. John Titor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I'm pretty sure it was John Titor, come back from the future to prevent exactly that from happening.

  67. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by theantipop · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why I moved to Cincinnati.

  68. and by unity100 · · Score: 1

    in many cases, intuition may be wrong. you shouldnt 'intuite' that rigidly in things you are not sure of yet.

  69. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the shark still looks fake.

  70. Cleaning up... by BurtCrep · · Score: 1

    Sounds like weeks of fun ahead, mopping up a ton of evaporating helium, chatting along like a flock of canaries. No really...

  71. The aliens sabotoged it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The aliens put top priority into making sure that the collider did not come online and seed a black hole.

    Interestingly enough, the aliens' normal work centers around stabilizing the worldwide financial markets. That work obviously suffered while they were preoccupied. It is taking some time for them to get back on track, too.

  72. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are *quite* heavy in a gravity well.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  73. Delay until 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Latest news is that they delay it until 2012.

  74. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

    The absolute zero of empty space is a much different situation than the absolute zero of the collider.

    Conduction is a bitch.

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
  75. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're too heavy?

  76. Re:Hmmmmmm Funny that you should mention by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    How many spies can survive being in a microwave?

    (Anyway, I don't own a microwave. Butt, if it pleases you, i'll report my findings after unseating and reattaching the commode...hehehe)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  77. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who do not know, that is a Mark Twain quote (presumed to be, anyhow)

    "When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it's always twenty years behind the times."

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  78. Working down a black hole by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

    The repairs are going to take a long time. A blck hole formed and time moves real slowly down there now. Good new is the technicians get paid in uphole time.

    --
    Squirrel!
  79. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by elmartinos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spacesuits operate in vacuum, which means there are almost no no particles around, so the word temperature does not make much sense there. Vacuum is an excellent insulator, so it is easy to keep them warm. It is a myth that you instantly freeze when exposed to the vacuum of space.

  80. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of the low particle density in space, a lot less heat is conducted away from the space suit. It's quite a different environment.

    --anon

  81. God Damn Gnomes by ZirbMonkey · · Score: 1

    First it was socks, now it's liquid helium cooled super conducting magnetic insulators. What's next?!

  82. Pickup Line of the Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey baby, I have a Large Hadron Colliding in my Pants, and it wants to look into black holes. Heh.

    1. Re:Pickup Line of the Day by MudBoy · · Score: 1

      Hey baby, I have a Large Hardon Collider in my Pants, and it wants to look into black holes. Heh.

      There, fixed that for you

  83. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space suits work in a vacuum - there's no convection or conduction, and therefore the heat transfer is very slow. If you are working with solid or liquid things near 0K, anything you use to work will cool down extremely quickly, possibly deforming and cracking or becoming brittle in the process. Aditionally, you'd have to be careful with any humidity in the surrounding air, since that will quickly cover your workplace in a solid layer of ice.

  84. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the same. Space is warmer than 0K, and it is empty, so it takes a very long time to steal all your energy. As opposed to a LNO2 bath that would steal your energy much faster.

  85. A possible reason for the setback by lkstrand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can this explain the reason for the setback?

    "the paper suggested that future effects caused by the production of particles, such as the Higgs, could ripple backwards in time and prevent the LHC from ever operating."

  86. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space suits don't keep you warm in absolute zero. Space suits only keep your body from being unduly stressed by the vacuum of outer space, which, by the way, has very little matter and thus very little heat conductance.

    Spread it around: Space isn't warm, and space isn't cold. Space is just not.

  87. FFS use metric, you arseholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole world is laughing at you, you hillbillies!

  88. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you are in space here around the earth it is not absolute zero because space is still kept warm by the sun afaik.

  89. anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a black hole machine alright. It has sucked billions of dollars already.

  90. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You confuse the relative vacuum outside our planet's atmosphere with absolute zero. The difference is in the transfer of thermal energy. Vacuum cannot absorb heat and so the suit remains at an operating temperature, while liquid helium can absorb heat and cause the suit (and its occupant) to freeze.

    For a practical example of this, try stepping outside into 40F/4C air. Brisk, no? Now step into a 40F/4C tub of water. Actually, don't, unless you have adult supervision to help you cope with the sudden shock.

  91. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vacuum of space has zero thermal conductivity. Liquid helium at 1.9K has incredibly high thermal conductivity. That's why they're using it, and at that specific temperature - for cooling.

  92. Puerto Rico is half metric by stryders · · Score: 1

    The US isn't even consistent. Puerto Rico has distance on the roads in Kilometers, and sells gas by the Liter, but speed limits in MPH.

  93. RROD? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    So it's a giant ring, it's had heating problems?

    It's acquired the red ring of death.

  94. Re:-456 F? What is that? by bh_doc · · Score: 1

    Exactly how much energy would a Library of Congress contain, anyway?

  95. LHC is coming (back) soon! by godcast · · Score: 1

    ...the big bang shall sound and, and, and, em, the world continues.

  96. Fix Schedule by oloron · · Score: 1

    I just got off the phone with one of the network engineers at CERN, they expect to have the whole thing up and running again by Dec 21st, 2012, nothing to be alarmed about here, people tend to read into things way too much :)

  97. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spacesuits allow people to work in a vacuum, which isn't the same as an atmospheric environment at 1 Kelvin.

    For one thing, you don't have to deal with conductive heat transfer in space.

  98. Hacked? by jobst · · Score: 1

    I wonder whether the guys who hacked into the LHC a few weeks back had a better ride than the CERN guys want to admit???

    --
    to code or not to code, that is the question.
  99. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because in space there's no air around spacesuits so temperature only drops mainly due to human body radiation.

    I say keep the temperature low and have the maintenance workers cuddle every minute or so.

  100. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because in a vacuum there is no convection, and the heat transfer is much slower.

  101. The Anthropic Principle by the_povinator · · Score: 1
    It's the Anthropic Principle, people! We only observe parallel universes in which the LHC fails to boot because the LHC will kill us. The LHC will never be seen to work.

    Don't you get it, people? Soylent green is us! It's us!!!

    --
    The .sig is dead, and I believe I had a hand in killing it.
  102. Don't be fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are sweatting there in their 10 billion dollar bunker hoping that the LHC singularity has dissipated by April. If not, by breaking the news on April 1st they hope no one will take them seriously until it's too late to have the angry "told-you-so"-mobs torture them to the inevitable end.

  103. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

    You're right. And now we are both nerds together.

  104. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, there's some truth to it. Shoot water into a vacuum. What happens? Ice crystals. PV=NRT. So, while you won't freeze instantly, you will freeze eventually.

  105. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Lost+Race · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shoot water into a vacuum. What happens? Ice crystals.

    What if it's a really hot vacuum?

  106. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by Legion_SB · · Score: 1

    You're right. And now we are both nerds together.

    Apparently not a very good nerd, because you're wrong!

    The guy doesn't say "cubbies" until McFly makes him repeat himself - and he doesn't say the "100 to 1" shot stuff the second time.

    --
    'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  107. Re:Your telling me maintenance people cannot work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you would definitely freeze, just not instantly. your body radiates heat constantly, your skin would freeze very quickly and you would be unable to move as your body tries to expand from the decrease of external pressure. the real question is if you would freeze to death before you would suffocate?

  108. Re:They will trun it back the day after the CUBS w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not sports, it's Back to the Future.