I use this version and don't experience any problems with flash. Although I miss some plugins from firefox, chromium is much faster and I use it as my primary browser.
Kernel 2.0, which I wouldn't pitch as a secure software product anyways, was introduced in 1997. Windows 2000 Server on the other hand was introduced three years later.
It is also worth noting that Kernel 2.6 was introduced in 2004 and Windows Server 2008 four years later.
My head is fine without any tinfoil, thank you. I have much personal information on google and don't care much about anonymity. I often use my real name on the Internet (maybe even here someday).
But I know that difference of using a site that says "I promise you anonymity" and Tor.
Since when is "putting cruft on search results page so that it is barely usable" and "not implementing sessions and cookies" evolution? Google won because it was nice and clean compared to altavista and yahoo.
He didn't prove anything, he was just guessing that sending 500 malformed SMS messages *could* affect the towers negatively and the carriers probably wouldn't like that.
I agree that if these vulnerabilities have been found with fuzzing tools, they would have been detected just as easy in closed source software. But they could have crafted the input data a little according to the structure of the parser code.
But yes, you are right, I was basically backtrolling a troll and it shouldn't be modded up..
So cursive isn't really superior, it is just mandated by law in your case. The mandated security practices are even worse than say digitally signed documents.
I also don't really see why the Unicode- or ASCII-standard would change in 70 years. It's been around since the 1960s.
Slashdot Mirror
The problem starts when people start "photoshopping" with GIMP and Corel (if that is still around), so it is a somewhat valid concern.
Not shipping?
just to clarify that they aren't kidding
Look at the hand
My boss however *only* does coding tricks. And he puts them in one big 1k line function.
And is proud of it.
So maybe it's time for both kernel developers and distribution packagers to focus a little bit more on which hardware users are buying.
Which is not multi (4+) core servers, but rather cheap laptops and netbooks.
And, anyway, lower power consumption and better efficiency will probably also benefit the "big iron".
Chrome OS to the rescue.
Sadly, I suspect it will be the only rescue.
I use this version and don't experience any problems with flash. Although I miss some plugins from firefox, chromium is much faster and I use it as my primary browser.
It's shocking that anyone in this day and age still finds it surprising when scientific experiments produce counterintuitive results.
I bet your intuition was different.
More like
http://www.google.ie/search?q=**filehere**+filetype:torrent
It factors in when comparing defects in a products total lifetime.
Be careful when comparing Linux and Windows
Kernel 2.0, which I wouldn't pitch as a secure software product anyways, was introduced in 1997. Windows 2000 Server on the other hand was introduced three years later.
It is also worth noting that Kernel 2.6 was introduced in 2004 and Windows Server 2008 four years later.
My head is fine without any tinfoil, thank you. I have much personal information on google and don't care much about anonymity. I often use my real name on the Internet (maybe even here someday).
But I know that difference of using a site that says "I promise you anonymity" and Tor.
Again, with this approach you have to trust some invisible code running on a foreign machine.
You seem to equate "features" with quality of the search engine.
Some value
- speed
- a clean interface and
- relevance of the search results (which can be improved by analyzing my previous searches)
If you want to surf the web anonymously, use TOR. Trusting the site saying "we don't have server logs, PROMISE" is silly.
Since when is "putting cruft on search results page so that it is barely usable" and "not implementing sessions and cookies" evolution? Google won because it was nice and clean compared to altavista and yahoo.
He didn't prove anything, he was just guessing that sending 500 malformed SMS messages *could* affect the towers negatively and the carriers probably wouldn't like that.
I agree that if these vulnerabilities have been found with fuzzing tools, they would have been detected just as easy in closed source software. But they could have crafted the input data a little according to the structure of the parser code.
But yes, you are right, I was basically backtrolling a troll and it shouldn't be modded up..
Think "
I wonder if these vulnerabilites could have been found earlier if the code was open source."
That reminds me of Stunts 4D from 1990. Boy did I have fun with this game as a kid.
Thanks for finally explaining the CRT noise. Always wondered where that came from.
How do you call the economic system that allows people to trade goods without government regulation?
So cursive isn't really superior, it is just mandated by law in your case. The mandated security practices are even worse than say digitally signed documents.
I also don't really see why the Unicode- or ASCII-standard would change in 70 years. It's been around since the 1960s.
It took evolution millions of years before any organisms could just walk
So what does Asimo tell you about human ingenuity?
Get hamachi, mumble, a headset and play with your mates
That firehose thingy has a few dozen submissions, but hitting the "+" doesn't really do anything.