Most scientists don't give a shit about these journals or their profits. It is corporations that are working hard to keep information secret. Those journals don't produce work product, they merely publish it after some bullshit cursory peer-review.
Wrong, we want to use it to beat down corporations which take the basic and even advanced research paid for by our tax dollars and then become rich off of primarily ushering the research past the qualification gates. Most of the big pharma expense is in marketing and trials, trials in which they are legally allowed to hide adverse or inconclusive studies. The whole system is fucked.
I agree with what you said other than that last part. I don't believe it's a money sink for most colleges, if it was, they wouldn't be doing it. The money sink is when they plow the hard earned income from football and basketball into shit sports that no one watches or cares about.
Gotta start somewhere. They'll work out the bugs. I know this, if I was a taxi or uber or lyft driver, I'd seriously be making alternative career plans. I'm guessing they'll have to buy out the taxi drivers that have invested in badges and such. Lyft and Uber drivers are SOL.
Not any more than pulling the same jack-assery on a meat-bag driver. Don't forget these are literally mobile data gathering systems. It will accurately record how maliciously(and awkwardly) you threw your three hundred pounds of cheeto smeared mountain-dew dribbled slovenly self in front of its nicely maintained chassis.
It picks me up on the way to work, notices that you're also going the same way, picks you up, drops me off, picks up someone at my workplace going somewhat in your direction, drops them off cause they're on the way and you're good on time, then drops you off. P.S. Before you get mad about getting dropped off last, my co-worker is super-hot and single and thought you were kind of cute and had a good sense of humor. My co-worker has a thing for chubby neck-beards;-)
I too disagree, I'm conservatively estimating that about 10% of cars will be driverless in about 20 years time (+/- 5 years). My guess is that a lot of these will be fleet or co-op owned vehicles.
Handguns? At 600 yards? It was 400 yards horizontally, afaik, so 500 yards seems about right for the 32nd floor. I don't think the accuracy would be there with the barrel length of a typical handgun. I am pretty sure no one was rocking either a rifle or shotgun and/or weren't willing to go brandishing in the middle of a live shooter situation even if they had them in their camper or tour bus. So I think your wall of bullets would have hit the Mandalay from the first to the top floor and other adjacent buildings as well. At that point things might devolve into the gangsters that run LV thinking that they're under attack from the country folk and we'd have ended up with an all out war. Even if that amusing turn didn't evolve, the carnage from the country folk "defending" themselves would have probably multiplied the death toll several times.
Thanks for the clarification on distance, I wasn't thinking about duck and goose hunters as you mention in your response to the AC below.
You start off saying you don't know how I got this from your post. Then you post some stuff about technology advancing blah, blah, blah. Then you finish by saying that you agree I rephrased what you wrote, but you don't like the tone I used. Because after 20 years in the business you've not developed just a tinge of cynicism and are as bright eyed and optimistic as the day you graduated college.
I am neither also. However, the repugnicans were howling mad making all sorts of "closed door" meetings claims which were provably false while they were the minority party. Crying about how no one would tell them what was in proposed bills which were clearly available to them. Now that they are in power, the strategy they were gnashing their teeth complaining about is what they decided would be their go-to in order to push through their inhumane and even inhuman agenda. I don't buy the false equivalency that you are putting forth. The dems might be incompetent and unfortunately are also corporatists, however, the repugs take reprehensible to a wholly new levels as they plumb for new depths of corporatist fuckery.
Repugnicans are way beyond hypocrites, they are actively evil and aren't even credibly trying to hide it.
I think that upward angle too would add to the difficulty level (hunters don't shoot far upward, do they?), I'm guessing you'd need a stable platform of some sort. The amps would be good if people weren't jostling the equipment in their search for cover.
Good point. Hadn't thought of that. I guess no one at the "Harvest Country Music Festival" felt a need to carry or like you said, they were aware enough not to go looking for imaginary bad guys.
However, we now have a tyrannical government and all the guns and all the bullets did nothing to stop that. I support the 2nd amendment but it didn't do shit for us when tyranny arrived.
Filed under the "you have to pass it to see whats in it".
Wasn't that the strategy for ACA repeal that the Repugnicans were trying to use? Twice or was it three times that they tried that? The very last time, they weren't even sure what version they were voting on.
I am super-ultra-extremely liberal. I'm pro-regulation of industry, pro-solar, pro-legalizing anything recreational, organic, non-gmo, free-health-care for all, with a BS and MS in Engineering (I'm pointing out that I'm not a stoopid).
I can't back the anti-gun thing! I don't see it as relevant and frankly don't give a shit about it as of right now given my life experiences during my 47+ years on earth. I think we should have more guns, endless guns. Unregulated, unlicensed, unmonitored. I've not been able to absorb any argument that has convinced me that getting rid of guns is feasible, nor that it will help solve any of our endemic problems. Maybe I'm too 'murican! Plus there's the 2nd amendment too.
P.S. Look at what's been happening across the pond even, with terrorists now using vehicles as weapons...
I like where you went with this. The value of software isn't what it does for customers external and internal, but rather the career longevity that it can contribute to. So just create a good enough wheel and then keep it spinning until retirement... works for me!
If you're a naturalized citizen, you're as much of a citizen as the Founding Fathers. Don't let anyone tell you different.
Except for those who say that their allegiance is to Yahwe and not America, and that they don't recognise the courts, rights of women, or anything else not based on "god's" law.
smoking hot is of course in the eye of the beer-holder. I think she's at best average, I give her about a 5 - 5.5, of course I'm from Southern Cali so am exposed to significantly better looking women.
Slashdot Mirror
Since "limited times" has now been raped, maybe the whole section needs to be dropped as a pathetic joke.
Most scientists don't give a shit about these journals or their profits. It is corporations that are working hard to keep information secret. Those journals don't produce work product, they merely publish it after some bullshit cursory peer-review.
Wrong, we want to use it to beat down corporations which take the basic and even advanced research paid for by our tax dollars and then become rich off of primarily ushering the research past the qualification gates. Most of the big pharma expense is in marketing and trials, trials in which they are legally allowed to hide adverse or inconclusive studies. The whole system is fucked.
I agree with what you said other than that last part. I don't believe it's a money sink for most colleges, if it was, they wouldn't be doing it. The money sink is when they plow the hard earned income from football and basketball into shit sports that no one watches or cares about.
check urban dictionary, it means crazy.
I was responding to GPs Comment Subject.
Go ahead. Find a lawyer that will take your case, move there, sue. I'm guessing YANAL, cause you sound like you have it all worked out.
Gotta start somewhere. They'll work out the bugs. I know this, if I was a taxi or uber or lyft driver, I'd seriously be making alternative career plans. I'm guessing they'll have to buy out the taxi drivers that have invested in badges and such. Lyft and Uber drivers are SOL.
Not any more than pulling the same jack-assery on a meat-bag driver. Don't forget these are literally mobile data gathering systems. It will accurately record how maliciously(and awkwardly) you threw your three hundred pounds of cheeto smeared mountain-dew dribbled slovenly self in front of its nicely maintained chassis.
It picks me up on the way to work, notices that you're also going the same way, picks you up, drops me off, picks up someone at my workplace going somewhat in your direction, drops them off cause they're on the way and you're good on time, then drops you off. ;-)
P.S.
Before you get mad about getting dropped off last, my co-worker is super-hot and single and thought you were kind of cute and had a good sense of humor. My co-worker has a thing for chubby neck-beards
I too disagree, I'm conservatively estimating that about 10% of cars will be driverless in about 20 years time (+/- 5 years). My guess is that a lot of these will be fleet or co-op owned vehicles.
You so cray-cray!
Handguns? At 600 yards? It was 400 yards horizontally, afaik, so 500 yards seems about right for the 32nd floor. I don't think the accuracy would be there with the barrel length of a typical handgun. I am pretty sure no one was rocking either a rifle or shotgun and/or weren't willing to go brandishing in the middle of a live shooter situation even if they had them in their camper or tour bus. So I think your wall of bullets would have hit the Mandalay from the first to the top floor and other adjacent buildings as well. At that point things might devolve into the gangsters that run LV thinking that they're under attack from the country folk and we'd have ended up with an all out war. Even if that amusing turn didn't evolve, the carnage from the country folk "defending" themselves would have probably multiplied the death toll several times.
Thanks for the clarification on distance, I wasn't thinking about duck and goose hunters as you mention in your response to the AC below.
You start off saying you don't know how I got this from your post. Then you post some stuff about technology advancing blah, blah, blah. Then you finish by saying that you agree I rephrased what you wrote, but you don't like the tone I used. Because after 20 years in the business you've not developed just a tinge of cynicism and are as bright eyed and optimistic as the day you graduated college.
LabVIEW. FTW!
I am neither also. However, the repugnicans were howling mad making all sorts of "closed door" meetings claims which were provably false while they were the minority party. Crying about how no one would tell them what was in proposed bills which were clearly available to them. Now that they are in power, the strategy they were gnashing their teeth complaining about is what they decided would be their go-to in order to push through their inhumane and even inhuman agenda. I don't buy the false equivalency that you are putting forth. The dems might be incompetent and unfortunately are also corporatists, however, the repugs take reprehensible to a wholly new levels as they plumb for new depths of corporatist fuckery.
Repugnicans are way beyond hypocrites, they are actively evil and aren't even credibly trying to hide it.
Lol. Go back to class, your can't milk your bathroom pass for "intestinal distress" the whole day.
I think that upward angle too would add to the difficulty level (hunters don't shoot far upward, do they?), I'm guessing you'd need a stable platform of some sort. The amps would be good if people weren't jostling the equipment in their search for cover.
Good point. Hadn't thought of that. I guess no one at the "Harvest Country Music Festival" felt a need to carry or like you said, they were aware enough not to go looking for imaginary bad guys.
However, we now have a tyrannical government and all the guns and all the bullets did nothing to stop that. I support the 2nd amendment but it didn't do shit for us when tyranny arrived.
Pathetically sad and true.
Filed under the "you have to pass it to see whats in it".
Wasn't that the strategy for ACA repeal that the Repugnicans were trying to use? Twice or was it three times that they tried that? The very last time, they weren't even sure what version they were voting on.
I am super-ultra-extremely liberal. I'm pro-regulation of industry, pro-solar, pro-legalizing anything recreational, organic, non-gmo, free-health-care for all, with a BS and MS in Engineering (I'm pointing out that I'm not a stoopid).
I can't back the anti-gun thing! I don't see it as relevant and frankly don't give a shit about it as of right now given my life experiences during my 47+ years on earth. I think we should have more guns, endless guns. Unregulated, unlicensed, unmonitored. I've not been able to absorb any argument that has convinced me that getting rid of guns is feasible, nor that it will help solve any of our endemic problems. Maybe I'm too 'murican! Plus there's the 2nd amendment too.
P.S.
Look at what's been happening across the pond even, with terrorists now using vehicles as weapons...
I like where you went with this. The value of software isn't what it does for customers external and internal, but rather the career longevity that it can contribute to. So just create a good enough wheel and then keep it spinning until retirement... works for me!
Except for those who say that their allegiance is to Yahwe and not America, and that they don't recognise the courts, rights of women, or anything else not based on "god's" law.
FTFY
smoking hot is of course in the eye of the beer-holder. I think she's at best average, I give her about a 5 - 5.5, of course I'm from Southern Cali so am exposed to significantly better looking women.