Further down, if you would like to look, but I meant to say part of its atmosphere, which include the lighter elements of Oxygen, Helium, and Hydrogen. This left the denser elements which it consists of now(Nitrogen and Carbon dioxide.)
You got me, I wasn't trying to saying Venus didn't have an atmosphere, but its lighter gases (Hydrodren, Helium, Oxygen were all burned and or pull off) do to its close proximity to the sun. Leaving it with the dense gases which it is currently made of (Nitrogen and Carbon dioxide..maybe a little methane, but don't quote me I haven't taken an atronomy class since freshman year of college). So sorry in forgetting to say part of.
This is just a confirmation of my astronomers hypothesis, many believe that Venus was much like Earth before it was overheated and lost its atmosphere being too close to the sun. I mean it is great that we continue to discover various parts of the universe, but Venus does very little for us seeing that it is in no way habitable because of the extreme heat no almost no atmosphere.
RIAA is the most absurd organization around. They do realize that the radio is ancient compared to them. They seriously are looking for money out of everyone's pockets in a time when the the economy is in the tank. I mean they tried to get millions in imaginary damages from a college student. Now they are trying to get money out of an already struggling radio business which has been playing the music for free for well over 50 years.
You would be right in not labeling me a Ubuntu FF shill. I mean I use a wide variety of OS and browsers. I own a my primary machine is the one I described, though my MacBook Pro is a close second in which I use Safari and OS X. I also have a Windows Laptop for work which runs XP and I use FF. Every system has flaws, Windows gets exploited the most cause they are the biggest target(most users). Apple has a huge number of flaws, but no one notices, because few people target Mac users. Linux has a ton of flaws too, but they are patched far quicker than Microsoft. I'm just pointing out, if Google missed something that basic in their browser what are they going to miss in their OS? Is it a risk you want to take?
Robert Hansen found a flaw in the first day of using it that Chrome allows Javascript to run in View Source, meaning you can't check potentially harmful pages without Javascript running off. Didn't Chrome market itself as the most secure browser? Anyway IE, Firefox, Safari and Opera all caught this, yet Google missed it with Chrome. I'm sure their new operating system will have tons of neat features just like their browser, but will they miss out on the security end again while boasting they are the most secure? I'll still with my Ubuntu and Firefox for now thank you and avoid both Microsoft and Googles security flaws.
I agree in that many of your points, my main point is that I think the kid should enjoy his childhood. Which he doesn't seem to be doing trashing game consoles and what not. Yes, texting is replacing most voice with cell phones, but not gaming consoles. Most of the hand held game consoles don't have internet, and Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii all have far more interaction with headsets than text based due the ease (More people purchase the headset than the keybaord for PS3). I know from experience with a 9 year old talk trash on me in Call of Duty 5 with his high pitch voice.
If you noticed, I said I don't like Twitter either. I'm more concerned with his malcontent with with video game consoles and hanging out with Morgan Stanley Analysts.
Seriously, this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life. I mean I personally think that Twitter is one of the most ridiculous concepts imaginable and a site with horrible stability, but it has its place. I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia. Twitter is one thing, but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones? How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them? None the less I don't think a game console is going to replace a cell phone, most people like the idea of the phone evolving from a backpack, I don't foresee that coming back. Of course this child only being 15 wouldn't remember that cell phones were that big at one point. This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst. If he doesn't by the time he is 40 it will be like the movie Falling Down.
Until the guns evolve too far to the point where they believe they are better than their users and and revolt. My money is on the weapons winning, they will recruit Arnold.
Could always do what Russia does they recruit and help train them and supply them, but never officially support them however they pretty much sick them on people to have their way example with with Georgia.
The best defense is always a good offense. Why not launch an attack on North Korea? We have far more advanced technology and could probably cause more damage to them than they could cause to us. If we are crippling their systems, they won't be able to attack ours. I would love to see our government take off the gloves in the cyber world for a change rather than always invading everyone.
Just get an accomplice to carry your phone to a different location and make a call while you are committing a crime else where and you have an alibi. Prosecutors need to realize that this is a double edged sword, by using this method to prosecute people, the smarter criminals can use this to their advantage to give themselves alibis by having people make calls for them on their phone.
Mozilla has grabbed a large portion of the market share and the explosion in Mac purchases has increased the use of Safari. The third browser which is taking many of the users away is Google's Chrome which is probably the most innovative of all of the browsers with many neat features which include interaction between windows, the most customization of any of the browsers in terms of placement of objects as well as bringing users unmatched speed.
O'Reilly Media usually puts out pretty good books in the field of Information Sciences and I would be interested in reading the wireless networking chapter by Jim Stickley. I see an issue with the review, however an issue that makes me think the reviewer is incompetent.
"Unfortunately, far too few organizations spend enough time thinking creatively about security. More often than not, it is simply about deploying a firewall and hoping the understaffed security team can deal with the rest of the risks."
I see an issue with this statement in large because it is not true. The problem is not the lack of time spent on creativity, it is a lack of creativity from schooling. Most attackers find creative ways to get into systems because they taught themselves. they only have an objective and no process they have to follow. Many security professionals learned process of coding and of doing things and think they need to follow it. The professionals need to think like the attackers, in order to defend against them. It is like using a tiger team to test your network, they can fix your network the best cause they are thinking of ways to break into it first.
Slashdot Mirror
Further down, if you would like to look, but I meant to say part of its atmosphere, which include the lighter elements of Oxygen, Helium, and Hydrogen. This left the denser elements which it consists of now(Nitrogen and Carbon dioxide.)
I will call it my Tankragon.
KIDS THESE DAYS! I like the people who text while they are driving more... I want to see one of those lawsuits.
You got me, I wasn't trying to saying Venus didn't have an atmosphere, but its lighter gases (Hydrodren, Helium, Oxygen were all burned and or pull off) do to its close proximity to the sun. Leaving it with the dense gases which it is currently made of (Nitrogen and Carbon dioxide..maybe a little methane, but don't quote me I haven't taken an atronomy class since freshman year of college). So sorry in forgetting to say part of.
I can't code is my excuse! Don't go messing that up for me! I have a good thing going.
This is just a confirmation of my astronomers hypothesis, many believe that Venus was much like Earth before it was overheated and lost its atmosphere being too close to the sun. I mean it is great that we continue to discover various parts of the universe, but Venus does very little for us seeing that it is in no way habitable because of the extreme heat no almost no atmosphere.
RIAA is the most absurd organization around. They do realize that the radio is ancient compared to them. They seriously are looking for money out of everyone's pockets in a time when the the economy is in the tank. I mean they tried to get millions in imaginary damages from a college student. Now they are trying to get money out of an already struggling radio business which has been playing the music for free for well over 50 years.
I totally agree they will be corrected. The thing is on a security level what flaws will be exploitable and for how long.
You would be right in not labeling me a Ubuntu FF shill. I mean I use a wide variety of OS and browsers. I own a my primary machine is the one I described, though my MacBook Pro is a close second in which I use Safari and OS X. I also have a Windows Laptop for work which runs XP and I use FF. Every system has flaws, Windows gets exploited the most cause they are the biggest target(most users). Apple has a huge number of flaws, but no one notices, because few people target Mac users. Linux has a ton of flaws too, but they are patched far quicker than Microsoft. I'm just pointing out, if Google missed something that basic in their browser what are they going to miss in their OS? Is it a risk you want to take?
Robert Hansen found a flaw in the first day of using it that Chrome allows Javascript to run in View Source, meaning you can't check potentially harmful pages without Javascript running off. Didn't Chrome market itself as the most secure browser? Anyway IE, Firefox, Safari and Opera all caught this, yet Google missed it with Chrome. I'm sure their new operating system will have tons of neat features just like their browser, but will they miss out on the security end again while boasting they are the most secure? I'll still with my Ubuntu and Firefox for now thank you and avoid both Microsoft and Googles security flaws.
I agree in that many of your points, my main point is that I think the kid should enjoy his childhood. Which he doesn't seem to be doing trashing game consoles and what not. Yes, texting is replacing most voice with cell phones, but not gaming consoles. Most of the hand held game consoles don't have internet, and Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii all have far more interaction with headsets than text based due the ease (More people purchase the headset than the keybaord for PS3). I know from experience with a 9 year old talk trash on me in Call of Duty 5 with his high pitch voice.
If you noticed, I said I don't like Twitter either. I'm more concerned with his malcontent with with video game consoles and hanging out with Morgan Stanley Analysts.
Seriously, this kid sounds like he must have no friends or social life. I mean I personally think that Twitter is one of the most ridiculous concepts imaginable and a site with horrible stability, but it has its place. I mean it is helping in places like Iran and Eastern Asia. Twitter is one thing, but a 15 year old who is trashing video game consoles saying they are replacing cell phones? How long has this kid had a cell phone to begin with that the game consoles are replacing them? None the less I don't think a game console is going to replace a cell phone, most people like the idea of the phone evolving from a backpack, I don't foresee that coming back. Of course this child only being 15 wouldn't remember that cell phones were that big at one point. This kid needs to go out and play with some kids his age and enjoy his childhood instead of hanging with Morgan Stanley analyst. If he doesn't by the time he is 40 it will be like the movie Falling Down.
Until the guns evolve too far to the point where they believe they are better than their users and and revolt. My money is on the weapons winning, they will recruit Arnold.
It is only 10:37. I have $1.12 in change though, so I could get unlimited Pandora and two pieces of Bazooka.
Someone obviously needs to read my signature again.
I guess a one time fee of $0.99 isn't too much to ask. I do have over that with the change in my pocket from my two coffees I go this morning.
Could always do what Russia does they recruit and help train them and supply them, but never officially support them however they pretty much sick them on people to have their way example with with Georgia.
The best defense is always a good offense. Why not launch an attack on North Korea? We have far more advanced technology and could probably cause more damage to them than they could cause to us. If we are crippling their systems, they won't be able to attack ours. I would love to see our government take off the gloves in the cyber world for a change rather than always invading everyone.
Just get an accomplice to carry your phone to a different location and make a call while you are committing a crime else where and you have an alibi. Prosecutors need to realize that this is a double edged sword, by using this method to prosecute people, the smarter criminals can use this to their advantage to give themselves alibis by having people make calls for them on their phone.
I guess someone with Mod points doesn't think Drop Dead Fred was a very good movie.
Mozilla has grabbed a large portion of the market share and the explosion in Mac purchases has increased the use of Safari. The third browser which is taking many of the users away is Google's Chrome which is probably the most innovative of all of the browsers with many neat features which include interaction between windows, the most customization of any of the browsers in terms of placement of objects as well as bringing users unmatched speed.
With the RIAA's blatant disregard for sanity with its imaginary damages. My imaginary friend Drop Dead Fred was more real.
Look at the brightside he has new masturbation material to last him the next two years.
O'Reilly Media usually puts out pretty good books in the field of Information Sciences and I would be interested in reading the wireless networking chapter by Jim Stickley. I see an issue with the review, however an issue that makes me think the reviewer is incompetent. "Unfortunately, far too few organizations spend enough time thinking creatively about security. More often than not, it is simply about deploying a firewall and hoping the understaffed security team can deal with the rest of the risks." I see an issue with this statement in large because it is not true. The problem is not the lack of time spent on creativity, it is a lack of creativity from schooling. Most attackers find creative ways to get into systems because they taught themselves. they only have an objective and no process they have to follow. Many security professionals learned process of coding and of doing things and think they need to follow it. The professionals need to think like the attackers, in order to defend against them. It is like using a tiger team to test your network, they can fix your network the best cause they are thinking of ways to break into it first.