yes but there is a difrence between a stack of paper and a window with a scroll bar a text box and two buttons.
also you usualy need to sign each page of a paper agrement, but when i install a program or go on a website i definatly can't see the whole EULA
So at maximum the part i can see when i press I agree would aplie
> The problem is that they put them in legalese, which might as well be japanese for most
> people.
And yet 99.999% click "Agree" without even attempting to read the terms. Only fools agree to contracts which they have not read and understood.
And most are not that hard to understand anyway. "It's legalese and so I can't understand it" is usually code for "I can't be arsed to make the effort to understand it."
I am qiute sure that if i do not read the TOS or EULA then i do not know what the EULA is and can't be charged with breking it.
In other words I can't agre to somthing if i didn't read it
try java.sun.com and click on the learning link.
also use netbean for codding it realy helps
PS. Why dose slashdot require www. at the start of urls thats realy stufed up
put them on a usb hub the you will only have one transformer for all the devices note you may have to buy multiple USB cables with different ends but its good for the environment right?
It's gotten a lot better for non-techie users due to more websites testing against them though. I remember using Firebird 0.7 and about 1 out of every 20 sites would not render very well. For non-techie users, having to then start IE for more than 2 sites is a reason to not even try anything but IE.
that is why Microsoft dose not suport it for windows update and stuff
Lin-sux lost the desktop to OS X, and is now in the process of losing the server to OS X as well. OS X will take over every niche Lin-sux holds simply because it is backed by idiots, and programmed by amateur morons who have no considerations for security, performance, features, usability, etc.
Lin-sux DESERVES to die, and I for one hope that it happens sooner rather than later so that more people can know the true beauty that is OS X.
Think Different. Think Better. Think APPLE!!!!
linux is most definatly not programed by amateur morons it wouldn\t have lasted 5 seconds if it was.
also linux is FREE this makes it vastly superiour to Apple
linux is more secure than apple in many areas becouse it is patched so much faster.
it is also takes advatage of the latest and grearest technologies wich is both usefull and fun
Whatever happened to testing of installed hardware? You'd think they might csider that sort of thing important when it involves the lives of thousands of people. Then again, maybe they were drunk at the time.
Well, when we set up some cheap NAS boxes with redundant nics.. some load balancers and other goodies.. we tested it by yanking cables on the bonded nics and making sure everything still worked.
This was for an e-commerce site.. I would agree in hoping more testing with real failures would be done on systems that monitor air traffic.
Also, we were very drunk when yanking cables during our test.. so I don't think intoxication is really a factor. In fact, turning a drunken monkey loose in a data center with a clearance to pull cables is _very_ good fail over testing:)
it is point less to destroy a system testing it unless you have a big buget and can rebuild the system exactly the same intoxcated monkey destroying data center != testing intoxcated monkey destroying data center == (waste_of_money && destroying_data_center)
destroying_data_center == waste_of(time && money)
destorying_data_center != testing
That's why they should use Java then when the program crashes they can restart the JVM instead of the physical hard ware that would be much, much safer!:-)
And don't forget the IT guys that cant get bonded due to a shady past but are technically competent who will turn to crime to feed their families.
Are you seriously speculating on back alley disk defragmentation? What's next, a poster showing a PC tech laying on the ground with a busted PC next to him, and the phrase "NEVER AGAIN" underneath?
I think what was implied was people running computer stores with out a license and hopping nobody notices
what type of computer do you use? becouse i am preaty sure that restarting windows(and almost all other OSes) takes longer then restarting Firefox. this is especially true when they are updating restarting Windows.time > restarting Firefox.time
incorrect IA64 has the same modes a x64.
i have a Intel doc link on another computer i will post it when i find it (Intel's site search is crap)
also Microsoft's visual C++ compilers and virtually every over x64 compiler out puts ia64 compatible code (Microsoft complier even lets you chose where to optimize for IA64 x64
NO
x64 and IA64 are in esence the same architechtrue anything that runs on x64 runs on IA64 including visual studio and... windows or linux (you can chose)
x64 == IA64
x64 != IA64
x64 has a new mode from x86 wich has a difrent instruction set
Slashdot Mirror
or your WAP key could be 0000 or AAAA
/. also helps w/ comprehension and HTML skills
as well as keeping pepole up to date w/ the world
example.com IN A 1.2.3.4 example.com IN AAA ::FFFF:1.2.3.4
quote>
fixed that for you it is an AAA record not a AA record thanks
prehaps it was deposited there befor Mt. Everest was a mountain.
no realy
yes but there is a difrence between a stack of paper and a window with a scroll bar a text box and two buttons.
also you usualy need to sign each page of a paper agrement, but when i install a program or go on a website i definatly can't see the whole EULA
So at maximum the part i can see when i press I agree would aplie
the main reson not to use Chrome is quite clear realy have you read EULA
i for one will not hand all my data to google for a good browser
> The problem is that they put them in legalese, which might as well be japanese for most > people.
And yet 99.999% click "Agree" without even attempting to read the terms. Only fools agree to contracts which they have not read and understood.
And most are not that hard to understand anyway. "It's legalese and so I can't understand it" is usually code for "I can't be arsed to make the effort to understand it."
I am qiute sure that if i do not read the TOS or EULA then i do not know what the EULA is and can't be charged with breking it.
In other words I can't agre to somthing if i didn't read it
try java.sun.com and click on the learning link.
also use netbean for codding it realy helps
PS. Why dose slashdot require www. at the start of urls thats realy stufed up
put them on a usb hub the you will only have one transformer for all the devices note you may have to buy multiple USB cables with different ends but its good for the environment right?
Time-based releases two times a year are fine for most users.
but wheres the fun in that? the best part about linux is constanly fixing it
It's gotten a lot better for non-techie users due to more websites testing against them though. I remember using Firebird 0.7 and about 1 out of every 20 sites would not render very well. For non-techie users, having to then start IE for more than 2 sites is a reason to not even try anything but IE.
that is why Microsoft dose not suport it for windows update and stuff
err... until it crashed der!
Lin-sux lost the desktop to OS X, and is now in the process of losing the server to OS X as well. OS X will take over every niche Lin-sux holds simply because it is backed by idiots, and programmed by amateur morons who have no considerations for security, performance, features, usability, etc.
Lin-sux DESERVES to die, and I for one hope that it happens sooner rather than later so that more people can know the true beauty that is OS X.
Think Different. Think Better. Think APPLE!!!!
linux is most definatly not programed by amateur morons it wouldn\t have lasted 5 seconds if it was.
also linux is FREE this makes it vastly superiour to Apple
linux is more secure than apple in many areas becouse it is patched so much faster.
it is also takes advatage of the latest and grearest technologies wich is both usefull and fun
Whatever happened to testing of installed hardware? You'd think they might csider that sort of thing important when it involves the lives of thousands of people. Then again, maybe they were drunk at the time.
Well, when we set up some cheap NAS boxes with redundant nics .. some load balancers and other goodies .. we tested it by yanking cables on the bonded nics and making sure everything still worked.
This was for an e-commerce site.. I would agree in hoping more testing with real failures would be done on systems that monitor air traffic.
Also, we were very drunk when yanking cables during our test .. so I don't think intoxication is really a factor. In fact, turning a drunken monkey loose in a data center with a clearance to pull cables is _very_ good fail over testing :)
it is point less to destroy a system testing it unless you have a big buget and can rebuild the system exactly the same
intoxcated monkey destroying data center != testing
intoxcated monkey destroying data center == (waste_of_money && destroying_data_center)
destroying_data_center == waste_of(time && money)
destorying_data_center != testing
That's why they should use Java :-)
then when the program crashes they can restart the JVM instead of the physical hard ware that would be much, much safer!
was all perfectly legal because the Germans lost the protections of the conventions by fighting in a false uniform.
a false uniform is not the same as not wearing any clear uniform.
Wearing a false uniform is an attempt to infiltrate an Enemy this clearly falls under Espionage not fighting in a military.
if it worked along the lines of Microsoft's 'customer improvement program' or whatever it is called for office and stuff it would probably work
you could make voting compulsory other wise it isn't realy a democracy
alas but the EU is following close behind read this
And don't forget the IT guys that cant get bonded due to a shady past but are technically competent who will turn to crime to feed their families.
Are you seriously speculating on back alley disk defragmentation? What's next, a poster showing a PC tech laying on the ground with a busted PC next to him, and the phrase "NEVER AGAIN" underneath?
I think what was implied was people running computer stores with out a license and hopping nobody notices
clicky
what type of computer do you use? becouse i am preaty sure that restarting windows(and almost all other OSes) takes longer then restarting Firefox. this is especially true when they are updating
restarting Windows.time > restarting Firefox.time
also Microsoft's visual C++ compilers and virtually every over x64 compiler out puts ia64 compatible code (Microsoft complier even lets you chose where to optimize for IA64 x64
this is incorect IA-64 == EM64T i had an intel documentation for IA-64 wich explains this but i can't find it now.
NO x64 and IA64 are in esence the same architechtrue anything that runs on x64 runs on IA64 including visual studio and ... windows or linux (you can chose)
x64 == IA64
x64 != IA64
x64 has a new mode from x86 wich has a difrent instruction set