You can still perform NAT over IPv6, or set up a more intelligent proxy if your data stream carries information that could unmask the remote endpoint. There will be no difference.
That doesn't make any sense. A dead Li-Ion battery has little remaining energy, and that which does exist can't go anywhere because the built-in safety mechanisms would have burned out all the internal fuses.
And I'm sure it communicates with a number of microcontrollers to perform the real-time IO, rather than crippling the CPU with those tasks, and doesn't carry a giant completely unused GPU around with it that uses far more power than the CPU.
You cannot download unless someone else is uploading. Since uploading is copyright infringement, and thus illegal, you are party to the illegal action. Your argument is like claiming it's not illegal to buy bootleg goods.
It'll come down to an opinion as to whether or not the use of Tor implies an intent to allow others to break the law. While an anonymizer service itself can be used for both legal and illegal purposes
I was under the impression TOR was explicitly designed to allow others to break the law, for the benefit of regions where things like expressing an opinion is illegal. Of course an anonymizer service is only effective if there is plenty of other innocuous white noise on the same channel.
The users' own Hopper DVR is recording the television, transcoding it, and streaming it across the users' own internet connection to the users' own devices. This is not a service Dish is offering, merely a capability of the physical DVR they are renting to subscribers.
Ammonia reacts to form hydrogen. Hydrogen reacts in a fuel cell to produce electricity. Electricity drives the electric car. This is electrical storage, just one implemented as an irreversible flow battery rather than a solid rechargeable one.
Assuming it is, I guess it is time for self destucting time locked crypto,
Thats not possible to do for a number of reasons, primarily because one of the first things theyll do is image your computer.
What about this part?
maybe a password backed key on a usb device with self desctruct countdown
If the decryption key is stored on a USB key with a battery and RTC, it can wipe itself if you have not entered the password after a certain period of time. It can be tamper resistant and wipe itself if you attempt to open it. Now obviously nothing is 100% secure, but you get to the point where it basically becomes bomb disposal.
I'm not sure what trajectory second stages would have to take
Just to clarify, I'm talking about the first stage and boosters. The second stage takes the payload all the way to orbit, so you could land it anywhere you wanted, once they design a version capable of surviving re-entry.
but it I doubt it's going to take off from Boca Chica and land at Canaveral
Canaveral is too far north for a low inclination orbit anyway, and would result in an unnecessary land overflight.
if only because then they would have to have two sites be clear. Sure, they could set up a new site in Florida, but they would have to go through all the regulatory bullshit again to set up a new site.
Understand, I'm not talking about a launch site. I'm only talking about a landing site. The first stage landing would be nearly empty, and would be immediately lowered onto a ship, and taken back to the manufacturing facility for refurbishment. The regulatory bullshit around a simple landing site would be much lower.
And they would still need good weather at two sites, not just one.
If they intend to recover the first stage, they need good weather at the landing site anyway, where ever that may be. For a typical Falcon 9, the first stage will fly back and land at the launch site. For a Falcon Heavy, the boosters will fly back to the launch site, but the first stage will continue on for another three minutes, putting it well past the fly back point. Either you land somewhere downrange, or you splash down in the water. Splashdowns result in much more expensive refurbishment.
You pledge money to your own Kickstarter, so you're not out any money. You then sue Kickstarter, and get that money back. You've now doubled your money.
I'm amazed the machinery is tight enough to notice a few thousand pounds shifting fore and aft on a several thousand ton boat. I would have expected that to be well within the mechanical slop of the controls.
and their current enthusiast-gamer-nutjob CPU is specced at 220 watts.
I'll admit, the AMD FX was the only line I didn't check before posting. Their next closest chips are only 140W, and they've only got a couple at that. Most are 115W or lower. I didn't even know the AM3 socket was capable of 220W.
Intel abandoned the Netburst architecture in the mid-2000s. All that hardware is a decade old, except for the Pentium Pro, which is almost two decades old.
You people seem to forget we're dealing with chips that have features counted in individual atoms. 1V across three atoms may work, 1.1V across three atoms arcs over.
Luckily we're still dealing with features hundreds of atoms across, and not just three...
That's one of the reasons they're trying to get a launch center at Boca Chica in the southern tip of Texas.
I expect far and away the biggest reason is for recovery of the first stage of the Heavy. That's worth tens of millions of dollars per launch. Reducing facility crowding is just a bonus point.
They're planning on cross-feeding the center stage off the boosters. The boosters would drop off after around two minutes, and fly back to Boca Chica. The center stage would drop off three minutes later and continue on to a site in western Florida, or maybe a platform anchored off the shelf.
All electric power trains have multiple "power sources". You can't run your motor straight off your generator (well you can, but we don't, because that loses much of the purpose of the electric drive train). You must have some form of stable energy buffer for your drive to pull off of. When the only difference then is the size of that buffer, you can no longer objectively define a difference.
Series hybrids are... not hybrids. Any motor drive is going to have to have a considerable energy buffer. The only real difference between the "series hybrid" and the old diesel-electric systems we've had for decades on trains, ships, and submarines is the size of that buffer. The only reason for the term to exist is because "hybrid" became a buzzword, and so existing systems wanted to join in the publicity.
A hybrid requires multiple types of engine directly providing motive force. If you have a purely electric drive train, then you have an electric vehicle, regardless of whether that electric motor gets its electrical energy from a generator.
It's not about dead batteries, its about hollowed out electronic cases filled with explosives.
The previous poster was referring to dead batteries.
Uncharged/out of service Li-ion batteries are subject to more problems at altitude than properly charged ones.
You can still perform NAT over IPv6, or set up a more intelligent proxy if your data stream carries information that could unmask the remote endpoint. There will be no difference.
That doesn't make any sense. A dead Li-Ion battery has little remaining energy, and that which does exist can't go anywhere because the built-in safety mechanisms would have burned out all the internal fuses.
And I'm sure it communicates with a number of microcontrollers to perform the real-time IO, rather than crippling the CPU with those tasks, and doesn't carry a giant completely unused GPU around with it that uses far more power than the CPU.
You cannot download unless someone else is uploading. Since uploading is copyright infringement, and thus illegal, you are party to the illegal action. Your argument is like claiming it's not illegal to buy bootleg goods.
It'll come down to an opinion as to whether or not the use of Tor implies an intent to allow others to break the law. While an anonymizer service itself can be used for both legal and illegal purposes
I was under the impression TOR was explicitly designed to allow others to break the law, for the benefit of regions where things like expressing an opinion is illegal. Of course an anonymizer service is only effective if there is plenty of other innocuous white noise on the same channel.
The users' own Hopper DVR is recording the television, transcoding it, and streaming it across the users' own internet connection to the users' own devices. This is not a service Dish is offering, merely a capability of the physical DVR they are renting to subscribers.
Presumably the distributor is only distributing the print version, not the Kindle version, and has nothing to do with the conference.
If I assume the air pressure of 1% of earth means that the density is also 1% then: p=0.1225 kg/m3.
Then I get a terminal velocity of 82 m/s (or approx 300 km/u), if you drop down flat.
You're off by an order of magnitude on that atmospheric density. Terminal velocity is going to be three times that high.
By 2001, Athlons were running in the 1GHz+ range, and P4s were out up to 2GHz. The RPi is closer in performance to a low end Pentium II.
Not to mention a RPi would already be considered an old, slow machine even by 2001 standards.
Ammonia reacts to form hydrogen. Hydrogen reacts in a fuel cell to produce electricity. Electricity drives the electric car. This is electrical storage, just one implemented as an irreversible flow battery rather than a solid rechargeable one.
Assuming it is, I guess it is time for self destucting time locked crypto,
Thats not possible to do for a number of reasons, primarily because one of the first things theyll do is image your computer.
What about this part?
maybe a password backed key on a usb device with self desctruct countdown
If the decryption key is stored on a USB key with a battery and RTC, it can wipe itself if you have not entered the password after a certain period of time. It can be tamper resistant and wipe itself if you attempt to open it. Now obviously nothing is 100% secure, but you get to the point where it basically becomes bomb disposal.
I'm not sure what trajectory second stages would have to take
Just to clarify, I'm talking about the first stage and boosters. The second stage takes the payload all the way to orbit, so you could land it anywhere you wanted, once they design a version capable of surviving re-entry.
but it I doubt it's going to take off from Boca Chica and land at Canaveral
Canaveral is too far north for a low inclination orbit anyway, and would result in an unnecessary land overflight.
if only because then they would have to have two sites be clear. Sure, they could set up a new site in Florida, but they would have to go through all the regulatory bullshit again to set up a new site.
Understand, I'm not talking about a launch site. I'm only talking about a landing site. The first stage landing would be nearly empty, and would be immediately lowered onto a ship, and taken back to the manufacturing facility for refurbishment. The regulatory bullshit around a simple landing site would be much lower.
And they would still need good weather at two sites, not just one.
If they intend to recover the first stage, they need good weather at the landing site anyway, where ever that may be. For a typical Falcon 9, the first stage will fly back and land at the launch site. For a Falcon Heavy, the boosters will fly back to the launch site, but the first stage will continue on for another three minutes, putting it well past the fly back point. Either you land somewhere downrange, or you splash down in the water. Splashdowns result in much more expensive refurbishment.
You pledge money to your own Kickstarter, so you're not out any money. You then sue Kickstarter, and get that money back. You've now doubled your money.
I'm amazed the machinery is tight enough to notice a few thousand pounds shifting fore and aft on a several thousand ton boat. I would have expected that to be well within the mechanical slop of the controls.
and their current enthusiast-gamer-nutjob CPU is specced at 220 watts.
I'll admit, the AMD FX was the only line I didn't check before posting. Their next closest chips are only 140W, and they've only got a couple at that. Most are 115W or lower. I didn't even know the AM3 socket was capable of 220W.
Intel abandoned the Netburst architecture in the mid-2000s. All that hardware is a decade old, except for the Pentium Pro, which is almost two decades old.
You people seem to forget we're dealing with chips that have features counted in individual atoms. 1V across three atoms may work, 1.1V across three atoms arcs over.
Luckily we're still dealing with features hundreds of atoms across, and not just three...
The toasty end of boring desktop CPUs is somewhere north of 200watts already
Well... somewhere south of 100W, anyway, and even high end workstation/server chips are under 150W.
That's one of the reasons they're trying to get a launch center at Boca Chica in the southern tip of Texas.
I expect far and away the biggest reason is for recovery of the first stage of the Heavy. That's worth tens of millions of dollars per launch. Reducing facility crowding is just a bonus point.
They're planning on cross-feeding the center stage off the boosters. The boosters would drop off after around two minutes, and fly back to Boca Chica. The center stage would drop off three minutes later and continue on to a site in western Florida, or maybe a platform anchored off the shelf.
No, just duplication. Most filesystems have some degree of metadata duplication anyway, for redundancy and performance.
All electric power trains have multiple "power sources". You can't run your motor straight off your generator (well you can, but we don't, because that loses much of the purpose of the electric drive train). You must have some form of stable energy buffer for your drive to pull off of. When the only difference then is the size of that buffer, you can no longer objectively define a difference.
Series hybrids are... not hybrids. Any motor drive is going to have to have a considerable energy buffer. The only real difference between the "series hybrid" and the old diesel-electric systems we've had for decades on trains, ships, and submarines is the size of that buffer. The only reason for the term to exist is because "hybrid" became a buzzword, and so existing systems wanted to join in the publicity.
A hybrid requires multiple types of engine directly providing motive force. If you have a purely electric drive train, then you have an electric vehicle, regardless of whether that electric motor gets its electrical energy from a generator.