so now every developer just sets their recommended price to 350% the price they would otherwise . if amazon reduce it then you still get the same as their 70%. if amazon don't reduce it then they've decided a higher price will mean higher revenue and the devs get more.
It doesn't work if the windbag who want to tell everyone everything they've done no matter how little it matters to everyone else is allowed to sit down.
In fact really it's such a privilege to be allowed to work for him: you guys should be paying him and thanking him for letting you work in his fine company. Fucking whiners complaining about terrible working conditions, being expected to work for free and unreasonable expectations.
The game industry is horrible because it's one of those jobs kids grow up wanting.
It's like being an actor or actress.Great for a handful at the top but everyone else works terrible hours for shit pay trying to get their break which never comes.
It doesn't matter how many young coders they burn out or treat like shit there's always 20 more behind them to take their place.
If you want decent pay and conditions find a job which nobody wants.... or even better one which nobody even realizes exists.
So that would make you "Alexander Peter Kowalski".
From a quick search the only reputation you appear to have in the field is for writing malware, for sending long rambling threats to anyone who calls it malware and for being the most toxic to any project you join .
Locating you does not matter. Nobody wants to locate you. you're not important enough for that.
Lets try laying it out in small words.
lets imagine you're a network admin at an ISP(god forbid). Now lets imagine that you want to block the people using your network from accessing the site www.badcontent.net. Almost the entire system you laid out was based on the user voluntarily installing a load of crap on their machine and altering their own system which isn't a good starting point as you will not be the admin on every customers PC. The rest including the BGP and firewall setup is trivially bypassed by using a vpn which is cheap cheap cheap nowdays. the only way to block this is to lock down the network to the point that you can't use VPN's or almost any other useful protocol which will piss off any users who want to connect to their office VPN's or anything else.
nobody cares about how you think you're a ghost in the network.
And yet still you lack the ability to read. So sad.
There's a difference between stopping other people from taking over your own system and stopping other people from accessing content from a network. You don't seem to understand this.
Oh good god..... I just tried to look up one of those articles and he's like this on a load of other forums(4chan), he even quotes that same list.... again and again and again while insulting anyone who contradicts anything he says while repeating again and again and again that he's so very very very smart while replying to himself and displaying the same level of reading comprehension as he does above.
I don't think this guy is trolling, he actually is like this apparently.
I'm going to bold it this time in the hope you'll read it. how secure your system is has nothing to do with anything, nothing at all. Nobody cares about your system. Nobody here wants to break into your system. Nobody cares about finding you.
What they're talking about is accessing content when you're on a particular network and the network owner/admin doesn't want you to but when you contol the machine you're accessing the network with. The security of your system, how easy it is to find with wireshark and how many ports you have enabled have nothing to do with the problem.
yes we know you're very very proud of having closed all ports on your box. Yes we know you're a big boy who knows how to turn off unneeded services. however,that has nothing to do with the problem in question.
I've been asking for a long time but nobody has ever been able to provide any example of any government mandated blacklist ever which hasn't been abused or ended up with non child porn content on it. If such lists weren't almost guaranteed to be abused then it should be trivial to find a counter example.
There's a finite probability that there's one such out there but I've never heard of it.
People make the same argument about regular porn in countries where it is illegal: that if you make regular porn available then it will inflame the sexual desires of good upstanding citizens and lead to them raping people.
Unfortunately the exact opposite turns out to be true, regular porn becomes more available, rapes go down.
You want to believe.It sounds coherent, it sounds logical, it appeals to you. It's great in theory.but the data goes the other way.
I don't trust any claims you make about securing your system considering how terrible your reading comprehension is. Nobody wants to break into your system.
The point was that were he on your network bypassing your filters to access online content would be almost trivial. That has nothing to do with breaking into your system at all.
Yes and after being caught beating some kid to a bloody pulp for no reason can I claim I'm still a good person because I'm far far away from being the worst offender in the country what with some guy who fed bleech to his victims before raping them to death.
Being able to point to groups that are worse doesn't make your own any better.
The US is supposed to be a civilized western nation, When it tortures people: That there exist countries which torture people more does not make it any better. When it interns people without trial: the fact there exist countries which intern people more and for longer doesn't make it ok . When it abducts innocent people from around the world for the aforementioned internment and torture it doesn't make it ok just because some other nations have done the same in the past.
Like it or not the US has got a reputation for torturing people not because of some smoke and mirrors show but simply because it's been torturing people.
He said that if he was on your network your protections would be useless for stopping him from accessing any content on the net he wanted as long as he controls his own machine.
Securing your own system has sweet fuck all to do with that. By any chance are you some kind of politician? (it would explain so much)
He ran because he knew the Swedish police were eventually going to have him for rape, and all the evidence says it's a righteous cop.
Right..... you mean after the swedish courts said he was free to leave the country?
In other news blair1q's fantasy world people who the police release without charge are now considered escaped convicts and any such people who who tell the police their address in case they want to contact them will now be considered to have been discovered in a devious and effecient sting opperation. Also the whole silly "due process", rights to legal representation and "fair trials" will now be replaced with blair1q deciding based on what he half heard on the radio and what he read on some blog.
Wow, either you have really massive problems understanding statements in context(hint "hostile 3rd government") or you really haven't been following the news.
And attempting to defend yourself legally in court constitutes hiding when it's a court in a totally different country from the one that's charging you with a crime.
Ah, good, we cleared that up finally, you're just insane. that makes your arguments a lot easier to follow.
Like anyone else he has a right to defend himself in court and fight extradition. That does not constitute "hiding" under any reasonable definition of the word.
quite a few of the oppinons seem to be along the lines of: "sanctions against the individuals: good, sanctions barring the IMF etc from loaning money to the country: bad"
I was under the impression that they bar multi lateral financial institutions such as the IMF, the World Bank from doing business with Zimbabwe and other such financial interests outside of Zimbabwe from doing business with Zimbabwean companies or with the Zimbabwean government which certainly is going to effect everyone in the country, particularly the poor.
" for the past four years or so, Zimbabwe has been unable to obtain finance or credit facilities from international lenders to inject into the economy. And this is a direct consequence of a sanctions regime imposed against the Zimbabwe by particularly the US, and the EU. " "The US introduced economic sanctions on Zimbabwe through the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act, 2001. (ZIDERA) Through this enactment Zimbabwe's access to finance and credit facilities was effectively incinerated. " "No matter how evil a dictator Mugabe is, it cannot be right to force his downfall by killing off the country's fledgling economy, by erasing the gains made after 1980, and worsening the AIDS, and unemployment crisis. "
There are also sanctions against particular individuals and companies.
where in that is there anything about him being in hiding? he gave his address to the UK police before he handed himself in. He has a right to fight extradition through the legal system like anyone else.
In your world does any attempt to defend yourself legally in court constitute being "in hiding" or something?
Ah yes, you see children when people who are unhappy with the government beak the law by doing things like spraying illegal protest graffiti on the walls they're actually being dictators because they're breaking the law.... oh wait. that doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. merely breaking the law in some way shape or form doesn't automatically make you the dictator.
Slashdot Mirror
so now every developer just sets their recommended price to 350% the price they would otherwise .
if amazon reduce it then you still get the same as their 70%.
if amazon don't reduce it then they've decided a higher price will mean higher revenue and the devs get more.
easy
death by inhaling marbles- 100% lethal if something else doesn't kill you first
Home? We were lucky to have an old box to get murdered in!
I've avoided it but A few of my friends are desperate to get their break. I guess they got unlucky and happened upon crappy companies.
It doesn't work if the windbag who want to tell everyone everything they've done no matter how little it matters to everyone else is allowed to sit down.
In fact really it's such a privilege to be allowed to work for him: you guys should be paying him and thanking him for letting you work in his fine company.
Fucking whiners complaining about terrible working conditions, being expected to work for free and unreasonable expectations.
The game industry is horrible because it's one of those jobs kids grow up wanting.
It's like being an actor or actress.Great for a handful at the top but everyone else works terrible hours for shit pay trying to get their break which never comes.
It doesn't matter how many young coders they burn out or treat like shit there's always 20 more behind them to take their place.
If you want decent pay and conditions find a job which nobody wants.... or even better one which nobody even realizes exists.
So that would make you "Alexander Peter Kowalski".
From a quick search the only reputation you appear to have in the field is for writing malware, for sending long rambling threats to anyone who calls it malware and for being the most toxic to any project you join .
great reputation there.
.... and again.
Locating you does not matter.
Nobody wants to locate you.
you're not important enough for that.
Lets try laying it out in small words.
lets imagine you're a network admin at an ISP(god forbid).
Now lets imagine that you want to block the people using your network from accessing the site www.badcontent.net.
Almost the entire system you laid out was based on the user voluntarily installing a load of crap on their machine and altering their own system which isn't a good starting point as you will not be the admin on every customers PC.
The rest including the BGP and firewall setup is trivially bypassed by using a vpn which is cheap cheap cheap nowdays.
the only way to block this is to lock down the network to the point that you can't use VPN's or almost any other useful protocol which will piss off any users who want to connect to their office VPN's or anything else.
nobody cares about how you think you're a ghost in the network.
And yet still you lack the ability to read.
So sad.
There's a difference between stopping other people from taking over your own system and stopping other people from accessing content from a network.
You don't seem to understand this.
Oh good god..... I just tried to look up one of those articles and he's like this on a load of other forums(4chan), he even quotes that same list.... again and again and again while insulting anyone who contradicts anything he says while repeating again and again and again that he's so very very very smart while replying to himself and displaying the same level of reading comprehension as he does above.
I don't think this guy is trolling, he actually is like this apparently.
oh my god. you really are that thick.
I'm going to bold it this time in the hope you'll read it.
how secure your system is has nothing to do with anything, nothing at all.
Nobody cares about your system.
Nobody here wants to break into your system.
Nobody cares about finding you.
What they're talking about is accessing content when you're on a particular network and the network owner/admin doesn't want you to but when you contol the machine you're accessing the network with.
The security of your system, how easy it is to find with wireshark and how many ports you have enabled have nothing to do with the problem.
yes we know you're very very proud of having closed all ports on your box.
Yes we know you're a big boy who knows how to turn off unneeded services.
however,that has nothing to do with the problem in question.
I've been asking for a long time but nobody has ever been able to provide any example of any government mandated blacklist ever which hasn't been abused or ended up with non child porn content on it.
If such lists weren't almost guaranteed to be abused then it should be trivial to find a counter example.
There's a finite probability that there's one such out there but I've never heard of it.
People make the same argument about regular porn in countries where it is illegal: that if you make regular porn available then it will inflame the sexual desires of good upstanding citizens and lead to them raping people.
Unfortunately the exact opposite turns out to be true, regular porn becomes more available, rapes go down.
You want to believe.It sounds coherent, it sounds logical, it appeals to you. It's great in theory .but the data goes the other way.
I don't trust any claims you make about securing your system considering how terrible your reading comprehension is.
Nobody wants to break into your system.
The point was that were he on your network bypassing your filters to access online content would be almost trivial.
That has nothing to do with breaking into your system at all.
Yes and after being caught beating some kid to a bloody pulp for no reason can I claim I'm still a good person because I'm far far away from being the worst offender in the country what with some guy who fed bleech to his victims before raping them to death.
Being able to point to groups that are worse doesn't make your own any better.
The US is supposed to be a civilized western nation,
When it tortures people: That there exist countries which torture people more does not make it any better.
When it interns people without trial: the fact there exist countries which intern people more and for longer doesn't make it ok .
When it abducts innocent people from around the world for the aforementioned internment and torture it doesn't make it ok just because some other nations have done the same in the past.
Like it or not the US has got a reputation for torturing people not because of some smoke and mirrors show but simply because it's been torturing people.
are you a little slow?
He said that if he was on your network your protections would be useless for stopping him from accessing any content on the net he wanted as long as he controls his own machine.
Securing your own system has sweet fuck all to do with that.
By any chance are you some kind of politician? (it would explain so much)
He ran because he knew the Swedish police were eventually going to have him for rape, and all the evidence says it's a righteous cop.
Right..... you mean after the swedish courts said he was free to leave the country?
In other news blair1q's fantasy world people who the police release without charge are now considered escaped convicts and any such people who who tell the police their address in case they want to contact them will now be considered to have been discovered in a devious and effecient sting opperation.
Also the whole silly "due process", rights to legal representation and "fair trials" will now be replaced with blair1q deciding based on what he half heard on the radio and what he read on some blog.
Wow, either you have really massive problems understanding statements in context(hint "hostile 3rd government") or you really haven't been following the news.
And attempting to defend yourself legally in court constitutes hiding when it's a court in a totally different country from the one that's charging you with a crime.
Ah, good, we cleared that up finally, you're just insane.
that makes your arguments a lot easier to follow.
Like anyone else he has a right to defend himself in court and fight extradition.
That does not constitute "hiding" under any reasonable definition of the word.
Well one of the first I cam across was :
"Zimbabwe: Demystifying "Sanctions" "
http://www.africafocus.org/docs10/zim1002.php
quite a few of the oppinons seem to be along the lines of: "sanctions against the individuals: good, sanctions barring the IMF etc from loaning money to the country: bad"
Could you elaborate on these sanctions?
I was under the impression that they bar multi lateral financial institutions such as the IMF, the World Bank from doing business with Zimbabwe and other such financial interests outside of Zimbabwe from doing business with Zimbabwean companies or with the Zimbabwean government which certainly is going to effect everyone in the country, particularly the poor.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com/pages/sanctions32.13170.html
" for the past four years or so, Zimbabwe has been unable to obtain finance or credit facilities from international lenders to inject into the economy. And this is a direct consequence of a sanctions regime imposed against the Zimbabwe by particularly the US, and the EU. "
"The US introduced economic sanctions on Zimbabwe through the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act, 2001. (ZIDERA) Through this enactment Zimbabwe's access to finance and credit facilities was effectively incinerated. "
"No matter how evil a dictator Mugabe is, it cannot be right to force his downfall by killing off the country's fledgling economy, by erasing the gains made after 1980, and worsening the AIDS, and unemployment crisis. "
There are also sanctions against particular individuals and companies.
Don't forget the calls for his assassination.
And the video in question is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
Your point?
where in that is there anything about him being in hiding?
he gave his address to the UK police before he handed himself in.
He has a right to fight extradition through the legal system like anyone else.
In your world does any attempt to defend yourself legally in court constitute being "in hiding" or something?
Ah yes, you see children when people who are unhappy with the government beak the law by doing things like spraying illegal protest graffiti on the walls they're actually being dictators because they're breaking the law. ... oh wait.
that doesn't make the slightest bit of sense.
merely breaking the law in some way shape or form doesn't automatically make you the dictator.
Sorry. you've still utterly failed to do your research.
December 6: a European arrest warrant is issued.
December 7: He hands himself in to the UK police.
Wow!
he was in "hiding" for so long.
Wow!
please, please educate yourself before continuing to make a fool of yourself.