There's some discussion to protest the next ACTA meeting in Sydney. It would be great to emphasise how shocking it is for ACTA discussion to be held behind doors when it affects everyone in Australia.
Please do post other options or suggestions against ACTA. I don't want this gross violation of democracy to occur.
We would really appreciate volunteers! Ask in the forum how to help. You can also help by advocacy. Get people to think and talk PPAU when angry about copyright/patents/internet/etc.
Note: PPAU were not in the recent federal elections because registration wasn't complete by the time the election was called.
You have your choice in the upcoming election with a choice of up to 25 parties for Senate and House of Representatives (Upper and Lower house respectively).
My last comment for those who feel demoralised at 'duopoly' of major parties and considered not voting; if you don't vote, then Australia would still continue to be represented by voters. Don't complain that you're not represented for the next 4 years.
If you really are against Labor, it works better to vote parties that are least for the parties. There's a most opposing parties method that will put Labor senators last to get votes so you don't have to understand the big list of candidates and preferences.
Why the hell would you elect someone you don't know? Did you know there's 21 federal parties such as the Liberal Democratic party? Non-custodial parents party? Here's a list of Political parties in Australia or officially from your independent electoral site: Current register of Federal parties
Guess who wins with USA's system? Plain party. With Australia's system, and Awesome party transfers 25% to Excitement party, Excitement party gets elected at 60%. A really good example in real life is 2007 Federal Election: South Australia
The independent electoral system works here. There's information provided if you simply google their websites. The media seems to not wish to report minor parties (probably because a few of them seem quiet). Voting for some unknown because you think you have no idea is just bloody stupid.
There's also a website to promoting awareness of other parties (Disclaimer: My website). There is:
About [ShockSeat] I'm tackling the ridiculous apathy and there's a youth study that shows non-normative intentions are on the rise. Non-normative means non-peaceful protests.
I'm currently having trouble trying to get information from federal parties themselves. If you have any influence, ask them to respond to the contacts I have sent out. It may be because I have no power, or the like. I have only received one refused response so far. It would be greatly appreciated!
I implore you, please make a valid formal vote to a party that almost if not fully represents you.
The Liberals only want a more stricter filter and are against Labor's filter because it's not strong enough. It's even found that the Greens don't say whether they wish for a better/weaker filter than Labor's current filter.
I'm trying to ask parties to fill out a survey for shockseat.com which includes asking of the issue of copyright infringement protections which include DMCA or similar. Unfortunately, out of 26 parties, only the Liberal Democratic Party has accepted and filled out the survey promptly. If you're concerned about DMCA or any of the issues from the sample survey, please encourage the parties to fill the survey out.
Whether people vote for or against parties on the issue is another thing. The site can't tell them who to vote for, but what the party position is, the informed voters still have to make up their mind. The Australian Labor Party did actually make the Internet Filtering Scheme an election promise that they have not yet carried out but are in the process.
Meant to add; one of the issues in my survey is how to police piracy or copyright infringements. I can't put this on my site if there's no parties talking about it (Unregistered federal parties like Pirate Party don't count at present).
This website ShockSeat cuts through the bull of each party to what they really support. I hope to show bi-partisan responses to issues that people may not otherwise know such as Internet Filtering Scheme.
If you wish to contribute, I need people to demand the parties to come clear on issues in the survey I have given them. So far, only 1 of 26 parties have answered and even then, I'm adding all the listed issues.
If anything, I hope it's a great guide to interested voters who are concerned about certain issues and don't want to wade through the sales pitch.
I'm recently doing a survey which will include game classification, there's no R and X classification for games. And not just internet filtering, but copyright, patent, whether they support other means to restrict content ownership and more. You can view a sample of the survey that was sent to parties here: http://shockseat.com/survey Although it's pretty amaterurish, it's already making it much easier to add more issues to my website.
Bonus: If my site takes off, I will get or at least present vague notions of what the parties plan to do so it would be up to the 'crowd' to demand clarity.
However, the DDOS attacks are preventing me from determining the votes of Lower and Upper House on issues like Copyright for the upcoming Federal Election, so whenever some of the government sites are up I am unable to access it at all, especially Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 at aph.gov.au (http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;adv=yes;db=;group=;holdingType=;id=;orderBy=priority,title;page=3;query=Dataset%3AbillsPrevParl%20Decade%3A%222000s%22%20Year%3A%222006%22;querytype=;rec=5;).
Some media are talking about it occasionally, it's not front page news and mostly it's just aggravating the government, the officials and site visitors. This isn't making the government abandon it or raising strong awareness with the public.
I implore you guys not to attack the government websites for months on end. If you're going to protest, try something else that's better at raising awareness.
Here's the list of party positions on the issues:
http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme
You can easily see that Labor and Liberal want some form of internet filtering scheme in Australia. I plan to raise awareness of this duopolistic positions on other issues over time. Australia has some advantage over USA in politics in that our vote can get transferred to the next party if the party does not have sufficient out-right win (I'll write how it works soon)./disclaimer, I own and started the site recently
How about completely opening the entire authentication systems up? All the methods being proposed are closed systems. There are systematic refusal to accept new corporation/sites/etc as a form of authentication without being celebrity, monopolist or payment for certificates, etc. Recently, I created a browser-based trust initiative here: JRep project
Although I initially came up by means of browser-based trust transfer but I believe this can be tweaked for authentication transfer.
Bonus: It's completely open and free because I want it that way.
Slashdot Mirror
Complimentary pirate party against ACTA. http://pirateparty.org.au/
There's some discussion to protest the next ACTA meeting in Sydney. It would be great to emphasise how shocking it is for ACTA discussion to be held behind doors when it affects everyone in Australia.
Please do post other options or suggestions against ACTA. I don't want this gross violation of democracy to occur.
Political party Pirate Party Australia
We would really appreciate volunteers! Ask in the forum how to help. You can also help by advocacy. Get people to think and talk PPAU when angry about copyright/patents/internet/etc.
Note: PPAU were not in the recent federal elections because registration wasn't complete by the time the election was called.
You have your choice in the upcoming election with a choice of up to 25 parties for Senate and House of Representatives (Upper and Lower house respectively).
There's websites like my website ShockSeat's Federal parties list that'll give you some basic information about parties. Or you can try Wiki's list of Political parties in Australia. Or simply look up the party names, almost all of them have websites and see what they have to say.
My last comment for those who feel demoralised at 'duopoly' of major parties and considered not voting; if you don't vote, then Australia would still continue to be represented by voters. Don't complain that you're not represented for the next 4 years.
If you really are against Labor, it works better to vote parties that are least for the parties. There's a most opposing parties method that will put Labor senators last to get votes so you don't have to understand the big list of candidates and preferences.
Disclaimer: My website
Why the hell would you elect someone you don't know? Did you know there's 21 federal parties such as the Liberal Democratic party? Non-custodial parents party? Here's a list of Political parties in Australia or officially from your independent electoral site: Current register of Federal parties
Our system is far better than USA with Preferential voting and Proportional representation. I'll give a quick example:
Guess who wins with USA's system? Plain party. With Australia's system, and Awesome party transfers 25% to Excitement party, Excitement party gets elected at 60%. A really good example in real life is 2007 Federal Election: South Australia
The independent electoral system works here. There's information provided if you simply google their websites. The media seems to not wish to report minor parties (probably because a few of them seem quiet). Voting for some unknown because you think you have no idea is just bloody stupid.
There's also a website to promoting awareness of other parties (Disclaimer: My website). There is:
I'm currently having trouble trying to get information from federal parties themselves. If you have any influence, ask them to respond to the contacts I have sent out. It may be because I have no power, or the like. I have only received one refused response so far. It would be greatly appreciated!
I implore you, please make a valid formal vote to a party that almost if not fully represents you.
The Liberals and Labor party actually want an internet filter in Australia.
The Liberals only want a more stricter filter and are against Labor's filter because it's not strong enough. It's even found that the Greens don't say whether they wish for a better/weaker filter than Labor's current filter.
Many others? Possibly, but not all federal parties in Australia are supporting it: http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme
I'm trying to ask parties to fill out a survey for shockseat.com which includes asking of the issue of copyright infringement protections which include DMCA or similar. Unfortunately, out of 26 parties, only the Liberal Democratic Party has accepted and filled out the survey promptly. If you're concerned about DMCA or any of the issues from the sample survey, please encourage the parties to fill the survey out.
They can't hide their positions on the Internet Filtering Scheme
Some people are watching their promises.
Whether people vote for or against parties on the issue is another thing. The site can't tell them who to vote for, but what the party position is, the informed voters still have to make up their mind. The Australian Labor Party did actually make the Internet Filtering Scheme an election promise that they have not yet carried out but are in the process.
Meant to add; one of the issues in my survey is how to police piracy or copyright infringements. I can't put this on my site if there's no parties talking about it (Unregistered federal parties like Pirate Party don't count at present).
This website ShockSeat cuts through the bull of each party to what they really support. I hope to show bi-partisan responses to issues that people may not otherwise know such as Internet Filtering Scheme.
If you wish to contribute, I need people to demand the parties to come clear on issues in the survey I have given them. So far, only 1 of 26 parties have answered and even then, I'm adding all the listed issues.
If anything, I hope it's a great guide to interested voters who are concerned about certain issues and don't want to wade through the sales pitch.
There's a list of what parties support the Internet Filtering Scheme(s): http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme
/disclaimer, I maintain the website.
I'm recently doing a survey which will include game classification, there's no R and X classification for games. And not just internet filtering, but copyright, patent, whether they support other means to restrict content ownership and more. You can view a sample of the survey that was sent to parties here: http://shockseat.com/survey Although it's pretty amaterurish, it's already making it much easier to add more issues to my website.
Bonus: If my site takes off, I will get or at least present vague notions of what the parties plan to do so it would be up to the 'crowd' to demand clarity.
Some more information about the website here: http://shockseat.com/about
Since the government is an elected democracy, you can vote with awareness of these parties: http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme
/my site
Some people like me are highlighting positions, you'll find some positions are quite duopolistic.
My site on the filtering scheme: http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme
Bonus: You can find out who's most against it in your electorate for Federal elections this year.
Here's the list of party positions determined: http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme
/disclaimer, I run shockseat.com
However, the DDOS attacks are preventing me from determining the votes of Lower and Upper House on issues like Copyright for the upcoming Federal Election, so whenever some of the government sites are up I am unable to access it at all, especially Copyright Amendment Bill 2006 at aph.gov.au (http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;adv=yes;db=;group=;holdingType=;id=;orderBy=priority,title;page=3;query=Dataset%3AbillsPrevParl%20Decade%3A%222000s%22%20Year%3A%222006%22;querytype=;rec=5;).
Some media are talking about it occasionally, it's not front page news and mostly it's just aggravating the government, the officials and site visitors. This isn't making the government abandon it or raising strong awareness with the public.
I implore you guys not to attack the government websites for months on end. If you're going to protest, try something else that's better at raising awareness.
Here's the list of party positions on the issues: http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme You can easily see that Labor and Liberal want some form of internet filtering scheme in Australia. I plan to raise awareness of this duopolistic positions on other issues over time. Australia has some advantage over USA in politics in that our vote can get transferred to the next party if the party does not have sufficient out-right win (I'll write how it works soon). /disclaimer, I own and started the site recently
How about completely opening the entire authentication systems up? All the methods being proposed are closed systems. There are systematic refusal to accept new corporation/sites/etc as a form of authentication without being celebrity, monopolist or payment for certificates, etc. Recently, I created a browser-based trust initiative here: JRep project Although I initially came up by means of browser-based trust transfer but I believe this can be tweaked for authentication transfer. Bonus: It's completely open and free because I want it that way.