You miss the obvious point. Keys can be stolen and copied, thus it's useful to destroy data, especially when it is no longer required buy still sensitive.
Keys have to be typed in by protein popsicles and they have to be stored in notoriously vulnerable meat-space neural processors which so far, nobody is interested in patching.
So far the difference between Windows 7 and Windows Vista is greater than the difference between Windows XP and Windows 2000, at least in terms of gross development work, although the code base is larger as a percentage of reworking not much would have changed. The interface update is more like 98 -> XP but self-righteous trolls don't seem to see past this.
Microsoft's Tick-Tock seems to be n1xx is a infrastructure release n6xx is the main release where n is NT 5 / 6 / 7 (Win2K was build 2195, XP 2600, Vista 6000, Windows 7 7279 the last time I looked). 7600 is a bit of a jump, not a real number of builds.
Windows 7 is the last appeal from death row. The same tired promises as ever, wrapped in fancier 3D windowing effects.
Oh you were trolling. I shouldn't have posted, now I can't mod your ass down.
Newsworthy? Morbid obesity increases chance of death or a serious brush with it for, well gee, just about any disease. High body fat messes with a long list of metabolic processes which have to do with staying alive. Being overweight can be considered a merely symptom of the actual metabolic problems going on.
Seriously though, if some villager wanted the latest tweet from Stephen Fry read to them verbatim, then this would be great.
In the real world, a villager with no first hand knowledge of what the internet is and what it can do, will ask a question assuming it's going to be like some kind of oracle... Villager: "So, how do I fix blight on my crops, and my cattle are sick too, what's wrong with them?"
[operator puts this into google now]
Operator: erm... google has news articel blight is threatening tomato crops in rhode island.. i found a list of five top crops for a pacific northwest vegetable garden... oh here we go: high-grain fee may produce illness prone cattle... yeah... um... you want me to read the abstract to you?"
Villager: *confused* "Um i'll just ask the witchdocter instead then..."
Operator: "yeah... sorry"
Transistors are naturally analog, it's only that we force them to be digital. If we are prepared to accept more probabilistic outputs then there are massive gains to be had http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/02/08/rice.university.pcmos/. Work is being done with analog computing too.
I think memristors will be complimentary to existing rather than a revolution on their own yet analog transistors would have George Boole flip-flopping between orientations in his grave.
First of all, nobody seems to appreciate how goddamn hard it is to make an operating system. You don't just wake up one day and fall out of bed and make one. Not even the smarty pants kiddies at Google can do that. These things take years. Decades, even. Ours started out 20 years ago, at NeXT. You could say it goes back to 1977, with the BSD guys. Heck, you could even say it goes back to 1969 with Dennis Thompson and Lionel Ritchie. Even Windows is -- what? Twenty years old? Something like that. For that matter, look at Linux. Correct me if I'm wrong -- and I'm sure you fucking freetards will find something to correct -- but I think Linus Tordalv started working on Linux back in 1991 when he was a high school student in his native Denmark. That's nearly twenty years ago, and the shit still doesn't run right.
What's your point? All they are really developing is a streamlined user land API, the kernel space is from Linux, the browser is existing stable code. All the difficult stuff that takes hundreds of millions of dollars is already done. It gets cheekier: the OSS community is going to do the heavy lifting ^H^H^H^H help out developing the thing, add additional features, port all the utils nerds want/expect, and third parties will write a metric assload of apps for it.
What we're looking at is a Tesla Motors momment -
1) Take a existing volume production rolling chassis (lotus elise)
2) Give it batteries in and a motor.
3) ????
4) Profit / Take a steaming dump all over automakers 100x larger than you.
A Google OS momment:
1) Use linux kernel + your custom user space that finally GIFR (Gets It F*g Right) + existing browser.
2) (There is no "????")
2) Profit / Deliver a crushing blow to the gonads of your nemesis (+ nice new nerd toy for the FOSS lads)
Infact, Google has little else to do -compared with an entire OS from scratch- but polish it and market it.
Mod me down I don't care but this could be a linux killer - it will be competing with the traditional Linux distro as well as OSX and Windows, yet none of you have really pointed this out in a suitably/. style self righteous fashion.
Linux has been a viable laptop and desktop operating system for about a decade, infact it is now really good on the desktop, is free, fast, stable, secure with a growing application ecosystem, yet Linux has utterly failed to take over the world only has 1-3% desktop market share (ok - depending on who you ask).
Do you really thing that a decade from the release of ChromeOS it's market share will be low single digits?
I say in a matter of months the market share will surpass that. Following that there is a damn good chance MS is going hemorrhage market share in a way that's without precedent in OS history. Unfortunately traditional Linux distributions X+KDE/Gnome/etc are going feel the hurt also. Consumers looking for a free-os switch from OSX/Windows are going to be gobbled up by Google.
In a short space of time Chrome will do what Linux has epically failed to do the last 15 years, and that is to market itself to the masses while taking a big bite out of Microsoft.
Slashdot Posting Form v0.1
Please select all that apply: ....
[ ] IANAL but ____
[ ] XKCD link : ___
[ ] Bash quote: ____
[ ] There, fixed that for you
[ ] In soviet russia the _____'s YOU
[ ] sudo _____ >/dev/null
[ ] Get off my lawn ....
[ ] Cory Doctrow
[ ] Al gore
[ ] Natalie Portman ....
It is true that aerodynamic forces are by far the greatest acting on a car at speed, but rolling resistance is the second greatest. This may be as much as 20% of drag in a car like the Veyron at 400kph. So yes, making the car lighter will make the car a little faster, since rolling resitance is partially influenced by weight. Real world: Adding a passenger may take 1-2mph off your terminal speed.
The Veyron is the very definition of a production car. With 400 units being produced, infact it is a mass production car by some measures. The guiness book of world records definition of production car really doesn't matter in the real world, it's just a book of bragging rights in this case.
It doesn't help the SSC aero that it doesn't look any better than most kit cars, nor has the kind of intended reliability the veyron would have. It wasn't designed to spend all day on the autobahn above 200mph and have a manurfacturers warranty. It is also no doubt completely undrivable due to it's power to weight ratio, first corner and it'll be part of the scenery and exhibit A in a lawsuit.
The Veyron weighs in at two tonnes and has four wheel drive. Thats one-ton per axle to transfer torque to the wheels. Over it's rear axle the two wheel drive SSC has 40% of the weight the veyron and has to put down 25% more power.
Can you say traction problems? One car never seems to even chirp it's tires 0-400kph, I bet the other could wheelspin above 200mph just by putting your foot down.
There are road registered, road legal dragsters that are not only faster accelerating than both cars, but hit that top speed by the end of a standing kilometre. I used to own one that wasn't too far behind the veyron. The SSC is very close to off-the-shelf competition parts (if not entirely) stuffed into a road-legal race car chassis that has been floating around for some time in various forms and customisations. Thus the veyron is a serious engineering masterpiece, a real concord-momment, like most great engineering it has it's fair share of detractors.
windows users laugh at you when you release a work in progress, or something that is simply a peice of shit, as they're used to commercial grade game releases. that can be very hard to compete with, considering the development time that goes into even a passable 3d game.
By your argument Linux should not exist since commercial OS's are so hard to compete with. Labor is not the issue with open software, it is more having a good idea that attracts people who want to work on it. So if a game sucks and stalls in alpha it is probably because it just outright isn't any good and nobody wants to fix it.
There are so many gamers so pissed off with the commercial game world who would leap all over a by-the-gamer-for-the-gamer open source revolution. So what's pissing us gamers off? How about paying upwards of $50 for a game only to have seven hours of single player game play and mediocre multiplayer with hardly any servers. Or amazing graphics, sophisticated sandbox gaming (Cryengine) and it's all over in that 7 hours of cookie-cutter linear storyline with little replay value (Crysis). Throw some buggy code and DRM and you have all the reasons to be angry.
If we get to the technology level we can build self-replicating nano machines that can survive and function outside very specific laboratory conditions / external energy input. The world would have already been long radically transformed by nanotechnology. Thus it makes the grey goo scenario unlikely (since we'd have the technology level to defend against this problem) and importantly, it means we would have long had the technology ability to go to mars more traditional ways easily and get a colony started.
IANAQP (I am not a quantum physist) but my understanding of the idea (and goal) of quantum computing is to use the physics of suposition to allow an arrangement of qubits to test all possible conditions of the logic set up in a single pass, rather than testing conditions iteratively as we do with logic today.
But this doesn't mean with the right arrangement of qubits, set up to represent the algorithim of a brute force key test, and assuming you are doing a simple match or statistical test of the decrypted data agains some sample data also tested by the arrangement of qubits, you could brute force a encryption key in one single iteration ?? ?
And further, that for something like AES-128, 256, 512 and higher you only need to a moderate increase the number of qubits for the quantum logic, rather than an stupidly exponential increase in the cycles of regular computation?
Used goods in any market, does not hurt sales of new goods. Period. The ability to resell *anything* adds value. No member of any industry has the right to stiffle the used sales market, unless they have a death wish. Used sales are a win-win for the consumer and the producer. The ability to sell something you bought new for about half the price you paid for it, is like getting a 50% discount, but the original retail outlet gets 100% of the money.
Unfortunately I'm pretty sure I have a very slow metabolism, ever since I was a pre-teen I would gain weight fairly quickly if I didn't actively work out, regardless of how much or what I eat.
Just from that, it'd be a fair guess to say you likely don't have a good genetic hand of cards when it comes to predisposition to Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, [insert diet/obeseity linked illness here].
YOU more than anyone else you really need to cut out junk food, excercise more, and work to get serious nutrition, because your genes won't provide natural protection relative to average, but rather a disposition to a shortened life with years of suffering thrown in.
Don't consider multi-vitamins. Very few people are actually deficient in vitamins and minerals, however pretty much all of western civilization at the momment is deficient in dietary fibre intake and omega 3 and other fatty acids. There is pretty solid research to show supplementation of these has compelling health benefits, if not are the root cause of many ills - whereas the jury is still out on vitamin pills. Incorporating a range of vegetables and fruits (*DAILY* not just now and then) in your diet will get you all the vitamins and minerals you need and many other valuable fringe nutrients, fibre, roughage and antioxidants. Stuff that isn't in pills.
I've been defending Vista for some time now since it worked just fine on my laptop. Now, however some sort of incompatibility between Vista, Firefox and Zone Alarm keeps freezing my browser.
It's reasonable to say that but wouldn't it make more sense to point the finger at the developers of Zone Alarm and the coding quality of it? You could uninstall that crapware and solve the problem - the Vista firewall is sufficiently good (but I'm not defending it, speaking relatively) with some very nice advanced rule setting options that you don't get in some pay software even (do some work in the advanced settings, make it restrictive by default inbound and outbound, by default it's a little open). What I'm saying is, how exactly is this Vista's fault alone, if the software works on XP? You haven't installed the XP version on Vista have you?
Maybe I'm bitter because I've seen far too many infested zombie windows machines with internet security suites reporting everything is peachy.
32-bit games can expect a performance boost in 64-bit OS. Because outside the 32-bit code the application is making calls to 64-bit rendering path from DirectX to the graphics drivers. The 2Gb limit on process ram for a 32-bit is more likely to be fully used as there is just more ram overall if you have 4/6/8gb and the kernel can actually address it. Therefore background apps and superfetch cache don't have to squeeze into the headroom of 3.5gb on 32-bit Windows.
Agreed. There is plenty of published benchmarks to show the tuning in Windows 7 to be significant compared to your typcial service pack patch-up. maybe foss advocates don't read those kind of articles *duck*
A closer look at 7 and you see how some of the speed was achieved, pretty much a backtrack on a shortlist of Vista mistakes. Part of tweaking Vista was to disable or delay the start of all the frivolous services Vista would start at boot. If you look at Windows 7's default services settings, you'll find many set to manual start or to delayed start by default. Infact it looks just like a tweaked vista installation.
It's almost as if microsoft scrutinist the how-to-guides on common speed-up-your-windoze sites to see what people were disabling. Indeed Microsoft actually pay attention to the modding commuity is a unprecedented thing.
They could save them selves twenty grand by hiring me, I'd do it for free. Infact, amongst the things I investigate regularily, I have thoroughly studied the subject matter over the years and could go right ahead write you a paper now.
Slashdot Mirror
These are remarkably common gadgets and can be had surprisingly cheap. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=sr_pg_2/103-3580931-0563800?ie=UTF8&rs=&keywords=gps%20tracker&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Agps%20tracker&page=2
Plenty of choice, and some for even about half the price, and in theory do a better job than the iPhone with more battery life.
You miss the obvious point. Keys can be stolen and copied, thus it's useful to destroy data, especially when it is no longer required buy still sensitive.
Keys have to be typed in by protein popsicles and they have to be stored in notoriously vulnerable meat-space neural processors which so far, nobody is interested in patching.
Consecutive characters my ass! No matter what I type my passwords are always *******, or *** or ****** etc. So far nobody has ever guessed!
pushing Vista damaged their credibility pretty strongly
Microsoft's Tick-Tock seems to be n1xx is a infrastructure release n6xx is the main release where n is NT 5 / 6 / 7 (Win2K was build 2195, XP 2600, Vista 6000, Windows 7 7279 the last time I looked). 7600 is a bit of a jump, not a real number of builds.
Windows 7 is the last appeal from death row. The same tired promises as ever, wrapped in fancier 3D windowing effects.
Oh you were trolling. I shouldn't have posted, now I can't mod your ass down.
Newsworthy? Morbid obesity increases chance of death or a serious brush with it for, well gee, just about any disease. High body fat messes with a long list of metabolic processes which have to do with staying alive. Being overweight can be considered a merely symptom of the actual metabolic problems going on.
Seriously though, if some villager wanted the latest tweet from Stephen Fry read to them verbatim, then this would be great.
... google has news articel blight is threatening tomato crops in rhode island .. i found a list of five top crops for a pacific northwest vegetable garden ... oh here we go: high-grain fee may produce illness prone cattle... yeah... um... you want me to read the abstract to you?" ... sorry"
In the real world, a villager with no first hand knowledge of what the internet is and what it can do, will ask a question assuming it's going to be like some kind of oracle...
Villager: "So, how do I fix blight on my crops, and my cattle are sick too, what's wrong with them?"
[operator puts this into google now]
Operator: erm
Villager: *confused* "Um i'll just ask the witchdocter instead then..."
Operator: "yeah
Transistors are naturally analog, it's only that we force them to be digital. If we are prepared to accept more probabilistic outputs then there are massive gains to be had http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/02/08/rice.university.pcmos/. Work is being done with analog computing too.
I think memristors will be complimentary to existing rather than a revolution on their own yet analog transistors would have George Boole flip-flopping between orientations in his grave.
First of all, nobody seems to appreciate how goddamn hard it is to make an operating system. You don't just wake up one day and fall out of bed and make one. Not even the smarty pants kiddies at Google can do that. These things take years. Decades, even. Ours started out 20 years ago, at NeXT. You could say it goes back to 1977, with the BSD guys. Heck, you could even say it goes back to 1969 with Dennis Thompson and Lionel Ritchie. Even Windows is -- what? Twenty years old? Something like that. For that matter, look at Linux. Correct me if I'm wrong -- and I'm sure you fucking freetards will find something to correct -- but I think Linus Tordalv started working on Linux back in 1991 when he was a high school student in his native Denmark. That's nearly twenty years ago, and the shit still doesn't run right.
http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some.html
Also: see my sig
What's your point? All they are really developing is a streamlined user land API, the kernel space is from Linux, the browser is existing stable code. All the difficult stuff that takes hundreds of millions of dollars is already done. It gets cheekier: the OSS community is going to do the heavy lifting ^H^H^H^H help out developing the thing, add additional features, port all the utils nerds want/expect, and third parties will write a metric assload of apps for it.
What we're looking at is a Tesla Motors momment -
1) Take a existing volume production rolling chassis (lotus elise)
2) Give it batteries in and a motor.
3) ????
4) Profit / Take a steaming dump all over automakers 100x larger than you.
A Google OS momment:
1) Use linux kernel + your custom user space that finally GIFR (Gets It F*g Right) + existing browser.
2) (There is no "????")
2) Profit / Deliver a crushing blow to the gonads of your nemesis (+ nice new nerd toy for the FOSS lads)
Infact, Google has little else to do -compared with an entire OS from scratch- but polish it and market it.
Microsoft: Google is not as stupid as you look.
Mod me down I don't care but this could be a linux killer - it will be competing with the traditional Linux distro as well as OSX and Windows, yet none of you have really pointed this out in a suitably /. style self righteous fashion.
Linux has been a viable laptop and desktop operating system for about a decade, infact it is now really good on the desktop, is free, fast, stable, secure with a growing application ecosystem, yet Linux has utterly failed to take over the world only has 1-3% desktop market share (ok - depending on who you ask).
Do you really thing that a decade from the release of ChromeOS it's market share will be low single digits?
I say in a matter of months the market share will surpass that. Following that there is a damn good chance MS is going hemorrhage market share in a way that's without precedent in OS history. Unfortunately traditional Linux distributions X+KDE/Gnome/etc are going feel the hurt also. Consumers looking for a free-os switch from OSX/Windows are going to be gobbled up by Google.
In a short space of time Chrome will do what Linux has epically failed to do the last 15 years, and that is to market itself to the masses while taking a big bite out of Microsoft.
they are just taking the piss out of us.
You comment? I use a slashdot posting form.
.... /dev/null
....
....
Slashdot Posting Form v0.1
Please select all that apply:
[ ] IANAL but ____
[ ] XKCD link : ___
[ ] Bash quote: ____
[ ] There, fixed that for you
[ ] In soviet russia the _____'s YOU
[ ] sudo _____ >
[ ] Get off my lawn
[ ] Cory Doctrow
[ ] Al gore
[ ] Natalie Portman
a.k.a. checkbox humour
It is true that aerodynamic forces are by far the greatest acting on a car at speed, but rolling resistance is the second greatest. This may be as much as 20% of drag in a car like the Veyron at 400kph. So yes, making the car lighter will make the car a little faster, since rolling resitance is partially influenced by weight. Real world: Adding a passenger may take 1-2mph off your terminal speed.
From the episode: "At this speed, the tires will disintegrate in 15 minutes - That's ok, we've only got enough fuel for 12"
The Bugatti has a 100 L tank. At 407kph it would cover 80km in 12 minutes.
Thats 125L per 100km or 2.2 miles per gallon. Bold font deserved.
For an extreme contrast a hypermiller might be able to take a unmodified toyota prius to 100mpg or 2.75L/100km at an average of 70kph.
The Veyron is the very definition of a production car. With 400 units being produced, infact it is a mass production car by some measures. The guiness book of world records definition of production car really doesn't matter in the real world, it's just a book of bragging rights in this case.
It doesn't help the SSC aero that it doesn't look any better than most kit cars, nor has the kind of intended reliability the veyron would have. It wasn't designed to spend all day on the autobahn above 200mph and have a manurfacturers warranty. It is also no doubt completely undrivable due to it's power to weight ratio, first corner and it'll be part of the scenery and exhibit A in a lawsuit.
The Veyron weighs in at two tonnes and has four wheel drive. Thats one-ton per axle to transfer torque to the wheels. Over it's rear axle the two wheel drive SSC has 40% of the weight the veyron and has to put down 25% more power.
Can you say traction problems? One car never seems to even chirp it's tires 0-400kph, I bet the other could wheelspin above 200mph just by putting your foot down.
There are road registered, road legal dragsters that are not only faster accelerating than both cars, but hit that top speed by the end of a standing kilometre. I used to own one that wasn't too far behind the veyron. The SSC is very close to off-the-shelf competition parts (if not entirely) stuffed into a road-legal race car chassis that has been floating around for some time in various forms and customisations. Thus the veyron is a serious engineering masterpiece, a real concord-momment, like most great engineering it has it's fair share of detractors.
windows users laugh at you when you release a work in progress, or something that is simply a peice of shit, as they're used to commercial grade game releases. that can be very hard to compete with, considering the development time that goes into even a passable 3d game.
By your argument Linux should not exist since commercial OS's are so hard to compete with. Labor is not the issue with open software, it is more having a good idea that attracts people who want to work on it. So if a game sucks and stalls in alpha it is probably because it just outright isn't any good and nobody wants to fix it.
There are so many gamers so pissed off with the commercial game world who would leap all over a by-the-gamer-for-the-gamer open source revolution. So what's pissing us gamers off? How about paying upwards of $50 for a game only to have seven hours of single player game play and mediocre multiplayer with hardly any servers. Or amazing graphics, sophisticated sandbox gaming (Cryengine) and it's all over in that 7 hours of cookie-cutter linear storyline with little replay value (Crysis). Throw some buggy code and DRM and you have all the reasons to be angry.
If we get to the technology level we can build self-replicating nano machines that can survive and function outside very specific laboratory conditions / external energy input. The world would have already been long radically transformed by nanotechnology. Thus it makes the grey goo scenario unlikely (since we'd have the technology level to defend against this problem) and importantly, it means we would have long had the technology ability to go to mars more traditional ways easily and get a colony started.
So not newsworthy at all, and get off my lawn.
IANAQP (I am not a quantum physist) but my understanding of the idea (and goal) of quantum computing is to use the physics of suposition to allow an arrangement of qubits to test all possible conditions of the logic set up in a single pass, rather than testing conditions iteratively as we do with logic today.
But this doesn't mean with the right arrangement of qubits, set up to represent the algorithim of a brute force key test, and assuming you are doing a simple match or statistical test of the decrypted data agains some sample data also tested by the arrangement of qubits, you could brute force a encryption key in one single iteration
?? ?
And further, that for something like AES-128, 256, 512 and higher you only need to a moderate increase the number of qubits for the quantum logic, rather than an stupidly exponential increase in the cycles of regular computation?
Used goods in any market, does not hurt sales of new goods. Period. The ability to resell *anything* adds value. No member of any industry has the right to stiffle the used sales market, unless they have a death wish. Used sales are a win-win for the consumer and the producer. The ability to sell something you bought new for about half the price you paid for it, is like getting a 50% discount, but the original retail outlet gets 100% of the money.
Unfortunately I'm pretty sure I have a very slow metabolism, ever since I was a pre-teen I would gain weight fairly quickly if I didn't actively work out, regardless of how much or what I eat.
Just from that, it'd be a fair guess to say you likely don't have a good genetic hand of cards when it comes to predisposition to Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, [insert diet/obeseity linked illness here].
YOU more than anyone else you really need to cut out junk food, excercise more, and work to get serious nutrition, because your genes won't provide natural protection relative to average, but rather a disposition to a shortened life with years of suffering thrown in.
Don't consider multi-vitamins. Very few people are actually deficient in vitamins and minerals, however pretty much all of western civilization at the momment is deficient in dietary fibre intake and omega 3 and other fatty acids. There is pretty solid research to show supplementation of these has compelling health benefits, if not are the root cause of many ills - whereas the jury is still out on vitamin pills. Incorporating a range of vegetables and fruits (*DAILY* not just now and then) in your diet will get you all the vitamins and minerals you need and many other valuable fringe nutrients, fibre, roughage and antioxidants. Stuff that isn't in pills.
I've been defending Vista for some time now since it worked just fine on my laptop. Now, however some sort of incompatibility between Vista, Firefox and Zone Alarm keeps freezing my browser.
It's reasonable to say that but wouldn't it make more sense to point the finger at the developers of Zone Alarm and the coding quality of it? You could uninstall that crapware and solve the problem - the Vista firewall is sufficiently good (but I'm not defending it, speaking relatively) with some very nice advanced rule setting options that you don't get in some pay software even (do some work in the advanced settings, make it restrictive by default inbound and outbound, by default it's a little open). What I'm saying is, how exactly is this Vista's fault alone, if the software works on XP? You haven't installed the XP version on Vista have you?
Maybe I'm bitter because I've seen far too many infested zombie windows machines with internet security suites reporting everything is peachy.
32-bit games can expect a performance boost in 64-bit OS. Because outside the 32-bit code the application is making calls to 64-bit rendering path from DirectX to the graphics drivers. The 2Gb limit on process ram for a 32-bit is more likely to be fully used as there is just more ram overall if you have 4/6/8gb and the kernel can actually address it. Therefore background apps and superfetch cache don't have to squeeze into the headroom of 3.5gb on 32-bit Windows.
Agreed. There is plenty of published benchmarks to show the tuning in Windows 7 to be significant compared to your typcial service pack patch-up. maybe foss advocates don't read those kind of articles *duck*
A closer look at 7 and you see how some of the speed was achieved, pretty much a backtrack on a shortlist of Vista mistakes. Part of tweaking Vista was to disable or delay the start of all the frivolous services Vista would start at boot. If you look at Windows 7's default services settings, you'll find many set to manual start or to delayed start by default. Infact it looks just like a tweaked vista installation.
It's almost as if microsoft scrutinist the how-to-guides on common speed-up-your-windoze sites to see what people were disabling. Indeed Microsoft actually pay attention to the modding commuity is a unprecedented thing.
They could save them selves twenty grand by hiring me, I'd do it for free. Infact, amongst the things I investigate regularily, I have thoroughly studied the subject matter over the years and could go right ahead write you a paper now.