Things that get the bitcoin "community" riled up are pretty amusing. Bitcoin is going to be a tax nightmare if you actually bother to file for it. Isn't it subject to capital gains tax in the US too?
Only instead of auto piloting the meeting for you, the chair will electrocute you to wake your ass up so you don't miss out on the important monologues.
You wanna know a really cool feature of cash? If the merchant from whom I buy something with cash gets robbed/hacked after I leave, I don't lose the rest of my cash. It's pretty nifty.
Don't take a contract you can't handle. If you claim to be able to do something, and you can't, you're in breach of contract. It doesn't matter how retarded the whole situation was - you agreed to do something and took money for it, then failed to follow through.
1. That's not how capitalization works. Try quotation marks.
2. Apparently you haven't considered that we don't want to do anything in your list.
3. Not wanting a shitty product isn't the same as not having an imagination.
I gotta tell ya, this is the silliest bullshit I've heard all day, and I had to talk to clients. The only difference between this guy and TIMECUBE is punctuation and capitalization.
Yeah, let's glorify more people who say "X is done wrong, someone else should fix it. But not me! I'm just here to point out that everyone else is an idiot!"
Vital stats sensors... for listening to music? How is that helpful to me? If I have a medical condition that requires constant monitoring of my vitals, I'm not going to use Apple bullshit for it - I'm going to use real medical hardware. If I don't have a medical condition that requires constant monitoring of my vitals, why the fuck would I want to constantly monitor my vitals? That shit isn't interesting. It doesn't help me enjoy music. I would rather throw my $30 directly into the trash can, because at least then Apple wouldn't be getting it.
So what Google is saying is that women and minorities need their hands held so they can take their first little baby steps into programming, because their little brains can't handle it on their own like a big white man's brain can. Cut the bullshit. Getting starting in programming isn't hard - there is literally a glut of free resources. If you can't get started in programming, the problem isn't your vagina.
The use of the term 'selfie' was wholly unnecessary to the story. In fact, the only reason it's there is so they can get their drivel on slashdot. Kill this spam with fire.
Is this "Spotsetter" something I'm supposed to have heard of? I feel like I got dumped into a story halfway with a bunch of characters I have no reason to care about.
When I started programming in PHP 12 years ago, I was still living in Belize. Talk about a place ill-suited to programming. I hear it's better now, but a lot of places barely had electricity back then.
In other news, I've apparently been doing PHP for 12 years. I need to reevaluate my life.
"You cared enough to comment" is always a stupid reply. As is patently obvious to anyone capable of higher thought processes, what I care about is the fact that nonsense is on my news feed, not some clown doing sports related anything.
Since when did slashdot become a fucking tabloid? Just because the guy in question is notable for his connection to Microsoft doesn't mean we should give a running, leaping, twisting, gyrating fuck about him buying a sports team. What is he going to do, turn the players into programmers? It's not important that we be aware of every time someone related to technology farts or coughs.
How many ways is this ridiculous? In the summary alone, you have quite a lot of nonsense. First, they brag about secure software. Your software is supposed to be secure, especially for something like this. You don't get bonus points because you thought about security where weapons were concerned. That's like bragging about not shitting your pants. Of course their security software is designed to prevent hacking - that's the point. Then you have the mathematical proof, which is just a fancy way of saying they ran a code analysis tool and their software totes doesn't have buffer overflow vulnerabilities, guys! If they really got fancy with it, maybe they could test it against real life security penetration testers, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Want to give me a free refrigerator, subsidized by ads? Sure! Other than that, you won't be getting my business if you want to put ads on your refrigerator. Take it or leave it.
We have some lovely elements coming together right here on the slashdot blurb:
1. Stupid pun instead of a descriptive title
2. Full caps in the article excerpt
3. Trying to bring up coding "culture"
4. Assertion that it totally could have been caught beforehand, but they aren't sure exactly how.
Somehow, I don't think I'm missing much by not reading the article.
Is it because they used youtube? Because internet based language exchange programs have been going on - at least in southeast Asia - for quite a while now.
Slashdot Mirror
Things that get the bitcoin "community" riled up are pretty amusing. Bitcoin is going to be a tax nightmare if you actually bother to file for it. Isn't it subject to capital gains tax in the US too?
Silly bullshit rhyming in the headline detracts from the actual story. Stop that.
I can, theoretically, defend myself against a mugger. I can't defend myself against what happened to Target, except by not using credit cards.
Only instead of auto piloting the meeting for you, the chair will electrocute you to wake your ass up so you don't miss out on the important monologues.
You wanna know a really cool feature of cash? If the merchant from whom I buy something with cash gets robbed/hacked after I leave, I don't lose the rest of my cash. It's pretty nifty.
Don't take a contract you can't handle. If you claim to be able to do something, and you can't, you're in breach of contract. It doesn't matter how retarded the whole situation was - you agreed to do something and took money for it, then failed to follow through.
All you people saying NO have no imagination.
1. That's not how capitalization works. Try quotation marks.
2. Apparently you haven't considered that we don't want to do anything in your list.
3. Not wanting a shitty product isn't the same as not having an imagination.
You heard it here first, folks: if you're going to try to not suck at your job, you're autistic. Normal people don't give a fuck about trying.
I gotta tell ya, this is the silliest bullshit I've heard all day, and I had to talk to clients. The only difference between this guy and TIMECUBE is punctuation and capitalization.
Jokes on you guys - the "leak" was fictional. The real experiment is the public's reaction to this.
Yeah, let's glorify more people who say "X is done wrong, someone else should fix it. But not me! I'm just here to point out that everyone else is an idiot!"
Vital stats sensors... for listening to music? How is that helpful to me? If I have a medical condition that requires constant monitoring of my vitals, I'm not going to use Apple bullshit for it - I'm going to use real medical hardware. If I don't have a medical condition that requires constant monitoring of my vitals, why the fuck would I want to constantly monitor my vitals? That shit isn't interesting. It doesn't help me enjoy music. I would rather throw my $30 directly into the trash can, because at least then Apple wouldn't be getting it.
So what Google is saying is that women and minorities need their hands held so they can take their first little baby steps into programming, because their little brains can't handle it on their own like a big white man's brain can. Cut the bullshit. Getting starting in programming isn't hard - there is literally a glut of free resources. If you can't get started in programming, the problem isn't your vagina.
It's pretty much like this
The use of the term 'selfie' was wholly unnecessary to the story. In fact, the only reason it's there is so they can get their drivel on slashdot. Kill this spam with fire.
Is this "Spotsetter" something I'm supposed to have heard of? I feel like I got dumped into a story halfway with a bunch of characters I have no reason to care about.
When I started programming in PHP 12 years ago, I was still living in Belize. Talk about a place ill-suited to programming. I hear it's better now, but a lot of places barely had electricity back then.
In other news, I've apparently been doing PHP for 12 years. I need to reevaluate my life.
Neither of the linked articles use the term "cyberterrorism". Bravo.
"You cared enough to comment" is always a stupid reply. As is patently obvious to anyone capable of higher thought processes, what I care about is the fact that nonsense is on my news feed, not some clown doing sports related anything.
Since when did slashdot become a fucking tabloid? Just because the guy in question is notable for his connection to Microsoft doesn't mean we should give a running, leaping, twisting, gyrating fuck about him buying a sports team. What is he going to do, turn the players into programmers? It's not important that we be aware of every time someone related to technology farts or coughs.
How many ways is this ridiculous? In the summary alone, you have quite a lot of nonsense. First, they brag about secure software. Your software is supposed to be secure, especially for something like this. You don't get bonus points because you thought about security where weapons were concerned. That's like bragging about not shitting your pants. Of course their security software is designed to prevent hacking - that's the point. Then you have the mathematical proof, which is just a fancy way of saying they ran a code analysis tool and their software totes doesn't have buffer overflow vulnerabilities, guys! If they really got fancy with it, maybe they could test it against real life security penetration testers, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Want to give me a free refrigerator, subsidized by ads? Sure! Other than that, you won't be getting my business if you want to put ads on your refrigerator. Take it or leave it.
We have some lovely elements coming together right here on the slashdot blurb:
1. Stupid pun instead of a descriptive title
2. Full caps in the article excerpt
3. Trying to bring up coding "culture"
4. Assertion that it totally could have been caught beforehand, but they aren't sure exactly how.
Somehow, I don't think I'm missing much by not reading the article.
"an smart phone"
And let's not forget that massive run on sentence at the end.
Is it because they used youtube? Because internet based language exchange programs have been going on - at least in southeast Asia - for quite a while now.