It is a superposition of useful and unusable data, until you read it.
Then Thors hammer slams down on the laws of nature, and amid lightning and a mad guitar riff, Murphy's Law and wave form collapse combine into always unusable data.
Change can be good or bad, here's my top 10 list: AOL Cygwin Exchange MS Office MySQL phpBB Quake/Unreal/Half Life The Sims/World of Warcraft Win95/X.NET
You may see a dependent clause, I see a qualifying description of what she views a white male as. From that perspective, her quote is offensively racist which reduces to, "white males cannot serve justice."
Secretly chalking your tires to see if you've been parked there for over X minutes? Isn't that the same as secretly attaching a monitoring device (albeit crude) to your property?
Instead of being a responsible human, and applying these technologies in useful ways (Orion anyone???), we must fear and dismantle them.
We have found fire to be much too destructive and have called on all our allies to dismantle their fire-making capabilities. If countries refuse to dismantle their fire-making capabilities, we will be forced into making a STRONG response. We may even STRONGLY encourage said nation to resume 6 party talks, or to sniff my dirty underwear. And if any nation comes to our country carrying fire, we will definitely not like it, and ask them to leave in our most impolite attitude which may also include a STRONG call to resume our 6 party talks, before it is too late and we do something really rash.
Both are correct. I prefer Inter-Continental Missiles, Ballistic. It makes document filing more practical when dealing with I-C Missiles, Vomit and I-C Missiles, +5 Arrows.
Agreed. Universal remotes also crash less, require less charging, and are more likely to be found near a tv instead of in the pocket of the owner or charging in a different room.
This article is retarded (as in handicapped, not special).
The scientific community is structured to protect current theories, rather than explore new ones. It has it's clergy too, and they are unquestionable. After all, who could be smarter than Einstein, Hawking, or Board Chair number 12?
Where does the majority of scientific inquiry happen? How is it funded, and who makes that decision? Does that party have any vested interest in current scientific theories that would prevent an objective funding of scientific inquiry?
There's a reason people are still investigating string theory with the dogma and zeal of a crusader, despite its primary purpose to reconcile a disproven theory with a proven one.
If I were a terrorist waiting for orders, which I assure you I'm not, I would disguise my weapons as instructed. Muhammad Al'Hasini and I agree the LEDs are a good idea and will get to work, if we were terrorists, which we assure you we are not.
Slashdot Mirror
Does this mean aftermarket alterations to my vehicle should be illegal too?
Well, I'll be pissed if the second habitable planet isn't named "Earf".
Someone that responds to the ad.
I dunno, gubment execs are the ones smart enough to think we need DHS as if we didn't have the NSA, CIA or the US Marshals.
Redundant agencies make our lives more secure. They have no risk of creating additional vulnerabilities in the tiny bureaucracy that is our gubment.
It is a superposition of useful and unusable data, until you read it.
Then Thors hammer slams down on the laws of nature, and amid lightning and a mad guitar riff, Murphy's Law and wave form collapse combine into always unusable data.
Change can be good or bad, here's my top 10 list: .NET
AOL
Cygwin
Exchange
MS Office
MySQL
phpBB
Quake/Unreal/Half Life
The Sims/World of Warcraft
Win95/X
You may see a dependent clause, I see a qualifying description of what she views a white male as. From that perspective, her quote is offensively racist which reduces to, "white males cannot serve justice."
And yet, we have to hire lawyers to read and write all the jargon we could never reasonable understand.
Being different doesn't make one illegal. That's a silly argument.
Secretly chalking your tires to see if you've been parked there for over X minutes? Isn't that the same as secretly attaching a monitoring device (albeit crude) to your property?
A police force is not legally constrained by their manforce. That is a physical constraint.
The use of GPS is consistent with the law, and a smart decision to work around current physical constraints.
Abusing GPS would be the same as abusing normal 'tailing' techniques. Ie following you around all day until they catch you speeding.
Or nuclear. It's proven, it's working today, and there's phenomenal amounts of energy.
When did America become so retarded?
Or you can participate in local music events. There's a lot more artists at the bottom than the top.
If it weren't illegal, I'd be on your side. As is, you're an idiot.
People do that?
Like this!
Instead of being a responsible human, and applying these technologies in useful ways (Orion anyone???), we must fear and dismantle them.
We have found fire to be much too destructive and have called on all our allies to dismantle their fire-making capabilities. If countries refuse to dismantle their fire-making capabilities, we will be forced into making a STRONG response. We may even STRONGLY encourage said nation to resume 6 party talks, or to sniff my dirty underwear. And if any nation comes to our country carrying fire, we will definitely not like it, and ask them to leave in our most impolite attitude which may also include a STRONG call to resume our 6 party talks, before it is too late and we do something really rash.
You mean a 3 story tall bottle rocket that can fly over Japan? Yeah, that'd be a rocket, and I guess they could be called "really big fireworks".
Both are correct. I prefer Inter-Continental Missiles, Ballistic. It makes document filing more practical when dealing with I-C Missiles, Vomit and I-C Missiles, +5 Arrows.
So you think I shouldn't create my new IT headquarters here?
Agreed. Universal remotes also crash less, require less charging, and are more likely to be found near a tv instead of in the pocket of the owner or charging in a different room.
This article is retarded (as in handicapped, not special).
The scientific community is structured to protect current theories, rather than explore new ones. It has it's clergy too, and they are unquestionable. After all, who could be smarter than Einstein, Hawking, or Board Chair number 12?
Where does the majority of scientific inquiry happen? How is it funded, and who makes that decision? Does that party have any vested interest in current scientific theories that would prevent an objective funding of scientific inquiry?
There's a reason people are still investigating string theory with the dogma and zeal of a crusader, despite its primary purpose to reconcile a disproven theory with a proven one.
It sounds serious, I mean 95,000 gallons of oil spilled into the ocean.
Oh wait, it was litres? Oh well that's like monopoly oil, we'll be alright.
Most of us could enjoy Monty Python if they weren't so over(mis)quoted.
Sure they're funny, but you and you and you and you and you aren't.
If I were a terrorist waiting for orders, which I assure you I'm not, I would disguise my weapons as instructed. Muhammad Al'Hasini and I agree the LEDs are a good idea and will get to work, if we were terrorists, which we assure you we are not.