"They'll come at us from a different angle now, knowing that they'll never again surprise us in that particular way."
You mean, they'll never attack the WTC again, after having bombed it once? Oh, wait, they DID attack it again.
They only have so many means at their disposal. A fully fueled 777 is just such a bigger weapon than anything else they can get into America, that I think they wouldn't pass up the chance to use one.
I use KDE, I write KDE applications, and I've shipped apps in the KDE release, but I say good for UserLinux.
UI consistency is more than similar widgets and colors.
I wish this would teach the KDE people some lessons: stop being a follower, stop throwing away your own stuff for in favor of GNOME, and start going back to doing the things that made KDE great. Any other path just leads to KDE becoming treated as a GNOME auxillary, nice to have but optional when the real work has to be done.
We already have a system of vouchers which can be given to artists, who in turn can exchange them for goods and services. Those vouchers are called "money."
Torvalds against anything proprietary? Where have you been since Torvalds has begun using Bitkeeper (a proprietary RCS) for all his kernel development?
If this anonymous individual used his anonymity to libel Luskin, then he forfeited his "right" to anonymity.
That's what the courts will decide, if Luskin does take it that far. That's what the courts are there for. If Americans value their rights under the law at all, then there is nothing wrong with Luskin exercising his.
Luskin is exercising his legal rights. How is that "crying?" Are we to be free in this country, but be personally attacked when we exercise our rights?
Stalking is a felony in many (most) parts of America, so this accusation being made is a serious one. Paul Krugman recently made the charge on Hannity and Colmes, a television program, and Luskin had to go there to defend himself, too. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from accountability, so I hope they find this guy and hold him accountable.
Paul Krugman is a public figure, being a prominent columnist for the most prominent news paper in the country. If people like Luskin can't challenge public figures without being subject to this kind of abuse, then free speech really is in trouble.
Google is right there. If people are clicking the ads just to click them, instead of clicking them to read the page they link to, then Google's paying customers aren't getting what they paid for.
How about we put it in the context of the hardline anti-American stance the French government has taken, the wide success of books describing huge American evil conspiracies, and the vandalism of American graves in France?
Slashdot Mirror
In your own way you just explained why the books cost so much.
The "flavor of the month" for five years?
h tm l
http://slashdot.org/articles/99/01/04/1621211.s
Open up your health care market and the shortage will be alleviated.
Well it sure did take long enough. Remember when KDE used to be known for its speed of development?
- 2.0: 10/23/2000
- 2.1: 2/26/2001 (4 months, 3 days)
- 2.2: 8/15/2001 (5 months, 19 days)
- 3.0: 4/3/2002 (7 months, 19 days)
- 3.1: 1/28/2003 (9 months, 25 days)
- 3.2RC: 1/19/2004 (11 months, 22 days and counting)
At this rate, we won't see KDE 3.3/4.0 (whichever the next version ends up being) until April 2005!
"They'll come at us from a different angle now, knowing that they'll never again surprise us in that particular way."
You mean, they'll never attack the WTC again, after having bombed it once? Oh, wait, they DID attack it again.
They only have so many means at their disposal. A fully fueled 777 is just such a bigger weapon than anything else they can get into America, that I think they wouldn't pass up the chance to use one.
Yeah, right.
While XFree86 has realized how dumb it is to have developers emeritus running the show, KDE is moving toward just the opposite.
No, KDE has to wake up before it can join in anything useful.
gcc.
gcc was dormant, Cygnus picked it up and forked off egcs.
egcs is now known as gcc 3.
I use KDE, I write KDE applications, and I've shipped apps in the KDE release, but I say good for UserLinux.
UI consistency is more than similar widgets and colors.
I wish this would teach the KDE people some lessons: stop being a follower, stop throwing away your own stuff for in favor of GNOME, and start going back to doing the things that made KDE great. Any other path just leads to KDE becoming treated as a GNOME auxillary, nice to have but optional when the real work has to be done.
Try The Tromp/Taylor rules: http://homepages.cwi.nl/~tromp/go.html
Life and death do not need special rules.
Ladders, one tactical aspect of go, have been proven to be PSPACE-complete. http://homepages.cwi.nl/~tromp/lad.ps
Badges?
We don't need no steenking badges!
The EU Commission won't stop it, they're too busy sticking it to the Americans^W^W^W^Wsuing Microsoft.
That's the artist's choice to make, not yours.
At no time does anything stop you from sending a check to an artist.
We're talking about giveaways here, not buying CDs or paintings or whatever.
We already have a system of vouchers which can be given to artists, who in turn can exchange them for goods and services. Those vouchers are called "money."
I think they have to say it doesn't restrict copying as not to run afoul of the Supreme Court's decision that legalized timeshifting.
Torvalds against anything proprietary? Where have you been since Torvalds has begun using Bitkeeper (a proprietary RCS) for all his kernel development?
If this anonymous individual used his anonymity to libel Luskin, then he forfeited his "right" to anonymity.
That's what the courts will decide, if Luskin does take it that far. That's what the courts are there for. If Americans value their rights under the law at all, then there is nothing wrong with Luskin exercising his.
Luskin is exercising his legal rights. How is that "crying?" Are we to be free in this country, but be personally attacked when we exercise our rights?
Stalking is a felony in many (most) parts of America, so this accusation being made is a serious one. Paul Krugman recently made the charge on Hannity and Colmes, a television program, and Luskin had to go there to defend himself, too. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from accountability, so I hope they find this guy and hold him accountable.
Paul Krugman is a public figure, being a prominent columnist for the most prominent news paper in the country. If people like Luskin can't challenge public figures without being subject to this kind of abuse, then free speech really is in trouble.
Google is right there. If people are clicking the ads just to click them, instead of clicking them to read the page they link to, then Google's paying customers aren't getting what they paid for.
Read the agreement before joining.
How about we put it in the context of the hardline anti-American stance the French government has taken, the wide success of books describing huge American evil conspiracies, and the vandalism of American graves in France?
I believe that they do all the public sector recruitment from a few select government-run schools for public service.
So when is OpenBSD going to refund the US taxpayer's money that was taken from those "crazy people" at DARPA?
Ingrateful deadbeats.
Gee, and Red Hat has started patenting parts of linux, and VA has stopped writing free software.
If KDE didn't have the Free Qt Foundation,t he latter would be a disaster.