To answer your question though, yes, anything can be banned here, we have almost no protected rights, so anything can be given, or taken, at the whim of parliament.
I'm an Aussie and my rights aren't controlled by the government. I do what i want to do and no one controls my thoughts or actions.
If that gunman with an assault rifle just turns out to be a Muslim I bet you would be claiming it had nothing to do with Islam and that he was a lone nut.
Just one. Outright destruction. It will either be ours or theirs but there are no half way measures they will ever ever accept. I suspect it will be our destruction as we have just a little too much acceptance, tolerance and diversity to do what has to be done.
I'm not sure where this cultural thing came from but, I guess, it's probably a "good thing" that we're in that position - where we can be outraged over the trivial things means we've probably resolved the major things. I suspect we'll always have reason for outrage as perfection simply will not happen.
Even a mass murderers words can be educational
The Historical Roots of “Political Correctness”
Western Europe is today dominated by an alien system of beliefs, attitudes and values that we have come to know as “Political Correctness.” Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour on all Europeans and is therefore totalitarian in nature. Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.
Social revolution has a long history, conceivably going as far back as Plato’s Republic. But it was the French Revolution of 1789 that inspired Karl Marx to develop his theories in the nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, the success of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in Russia set off a wave of optimistic expectation among the Marxist forces in Europe and America that the new proletarian world of equality was finally coming into being. Russia, as the first communist nation in the world, would lead the revolutionary forces to victory.
The Marxist revolutionary forces in Europe leaped at this opportunity. Following the end of World War I, there was a Communist “Spartacist” uprising in Berlin, Germany led by Rosa Luxemburg; the creation of a “Soviet” in Bavaria led by Kurt Eisner; and a Hungarian communist republic established by Bela Kun in 1919. At the time, there was great concern that all of Europe might fall under the banner of Bolshevism. This sense of impending doom was given vivid life by Trotsky’s Red Army invasion of Poland in 1919. However, the Red Army was defeated by Polish forces at the battle of the Vistula in 1920. The Spartacist, Bavarian Soviet and Bela Kun governments all failed to gain widespread
support from the workers and after a brief time they were all overthrown. These events created a quandary for the Marxist revolutionaries in Europe. Under Marxist economic theory, the oppressed workers were supposed to be the beneficiaries of a social revolution that would place them on top of the power structure. When these revolutionary opportunities presented themselves, however, the workers did not respond. The Marxist revolutionaries did not blame their theory for these failures. They blamed the workers.
One group of Marxist intellectuals resolved their quandary by an analysis that focused on society’s cultural “superstructure” rather than on the economic substructures as Marx did. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci and Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukacs contributed the most to this new cultural Marxism.
Antonio Gramsci worked for the Communist International during 1923-24 in Moscow and Vienna. He was later imprisoned in one of Mussolini’s jails where he wrote his famous “Prison Notebooks.” Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new “Communist man” had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian
soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.
Georg Lukacs was the son a wealthy Hungarian banker. Lukacs began his political life as an agent of the Communist International. His book History and Class Consciousness gained him recognition as the leading Marxist theorist since Karl Marx. Lukacs believed that for a new Marxist
I usually find myself agreeing with you mostly but in this we are diametrically opposed. Some people just don't deserve to be residing on the same planet as others and this is the case here. You cannot give them their caliphate as the goal is an Islamic globe and that goal won't change. if you break up the 'caliphate' then they will distribute themselves amongst the more rational and unless you have your head in the sand you know what that means.
I would be willing to bet my house that some of the kids he missed on that island are in the forefront of the cheerleaders of the current European invasion
You're confused, there is no easy access to full auto weapons here.
I'm pretty sure just about anyone reading here could easily convert a semi auto to full auto in minutes. It can be done with a shoe lace for God's sake.
Slashdot Mirror
It only makes no sense to someone purposefully being dense
To answer your question though, yes, anything can be banned here, we have almost no protected rights, so anything can be given, or taken, at the whim of parliament.
I'm an Aussie and my rights aren't controlled by the government. I do what i want to do and no one controls my thoughts or actions.
If that gunman with an assault rifle just turns out to be a Muslim I bet you would be claiming it had nothing to do with Islam and that he was a lone nut.
Heads need to roll, from the bottom to the top.
Then we definitely need his politician father as he supports the whole head chopping thing.
You are aware that you keep timers detonators and explosives apart until it's time to blow things up?
This whole story since the day after the incident reads like a script from exactly what the tinfoil hat crowd said would happen. .
And the 'tinfoil hat gang' who called it on day one are still considered morons and wrong.
I knew a guy in charge of security that had aardvark as his password. I think he was worse.
Having never followed Formula E I had to look up Tweet to Pass. That's fucking retarded.
How about you go and fuck yourself you pathetic sack of shit
http://www.breitbart.com/londo... -- yes I know it's Breitbat but you aren't going to actually get truthiness from the MSM.
Just one. Outright destruction. It will either be ours or theirs but there are no half way measures they will ever ever accept. I suspect it will be our destruction as we have just a little too much acceptance, tolerance and diversity to do what has to be done.
unless they are in a gun free zone and that's a lot of prime targets
I'm not sure where this cultural thing came from but, I guess, it's probably a "good thing" that we're in that position - where we can be outraged over the trivial things means we've probably resolved the major things. I suspect we'll always have reason for outrage as perfection simply will not happen.
Even a mass murderers words can be educational
The Historical Roots of “Political Correctness”
Western Europe is today dominated by an alien system of beliefs, attitudes and values that we have come to know as “Political Correctness.” Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour on all Europeans and is therefore totalitarian in nature. Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.
Social revolution has a long history, conceivably going as far back as Plato’s Republic. But it was the French Revolution of 1789 that inspired Karl Marx to develop his theories in the nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, the success of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in Russia set off a wave of optimistic expectation among the Marxist forces in Europe and America that the new proletarian world of equality was finally coming into being. Russia, as the first communist nation in the world, would lead the revolutionary forces to victory.
The Marxist revolutionary forces in Europe leaped at this opportunity. Following the end of World War I, there was a Communist “Spartacist” uprising in Berlin, Germany led by Rosa Luxemburg; the creation of a “Soviet” in Bavaria led by Kurt Eisner; and a Hungarian communist republic established by Bela Kun in 1919. At the time, there was great concern that all of Europe might fall under the banner of Bolshevism. This sense of impending doom was given vivid life by Trotsky’s Red Army invasion of Poland in 1919. However, the Red Army was defeated by Polish forces at the battle of the Vistula in 1920. The Spartacist, Bavarian Soviet and Bela Kun governments all failed to gain widespread support from the workers and after a brief time they were all overthrown. These events created a quandary for the Marxist revolutionaries in Europe. Under Marxist economic theory, the oppressed workers were supposed to be the beneficiaries of a social revolution that would place them on top of the power structure. When these revolutionary opportunities presented themselves, however, the workers did not respond. The Marxist revolutionaries did not blame their theory for these failures. They blamed the workers.
One group of Marxist intellectuals resolved their quandary by an analysis that focused on society’s cultural “superstructure” rather than on the economic substructures as Marx did. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci and Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukacs contributed the most to this new cultural Marxism.
Antonio Gramsci worked for the Communist International during 1923-24 in Moscow and Vienna. He was later imprisoned in one of Mussolini’s jails where he wrote his famous “Prison Notebooks.” Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new “Communist man” had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.
Georg Lukacs was the son a wealthy Hungarian banker. Lukacs began his political life as an agent of the Communist International. His book History and Class Consciousness gained him recognition as the leading Marxist theorist since Karl Marx. Lukacs believed that for a new Marxist
I usually find myself agreeing with you mostly but in this we are diametrically opposed. Some people just don't deserve to be residing on the same planet as others and this is the case here. You cannot give them their caliphate as the goal is an Islamic globe and that goal won't change. if you break up the 'caliphate' then they will distribute themselves amongst the more rational and unless you have your head in the sand you know what that means.
I would be willing to bet my house that some of the kids he missed on that island are in the forefront of the cheerleaders of the current European invasion
Yoiu need to shut up and stand in line and wait patiently for a Sharia hair cut.
You're confused, there is no easy access to full auto weapons here.
I'm pretty sure just about anyone reading here could easily convert a semi auto to full auto in minutes. It can be done with a shoe lace for God's sake.
People say her definitive album was nunsexmonkrock. she also hung around with Lena Lovich a lot in her youth. i adored Lena Lovich.
The only German Nina for me
Does this mean we can now start talking about the evils of gay scoutmasters? The AGW stuff is getting a bit boring.
The post you replied to appears to only contain verifiable facts? Are you really so stupid?
Moving the goalposts again? You are so fucking predictable.
I am joking. That was a label someone assigned me and I just knew you would love it.
You are such a typical heteronormative cismale it hurts
If a job is filled, it's fairly paid.
Does that statement mean you worship satan?