Slashdot Mirror
Anonymous Vows Revenge For ISIS Paris Attacks
An anonymous reader writes: As usual, Anonymous members are quicker to respond to threats than investigators and have announced #OpParis as revenge for the Paris attacks. Their action is similar to #OpISIS from this spring, launched after the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Previously Anonymous ousted thousands of ISIS Twitter accounts in #OpISIS. In a more conventional response, the government of France has been bombarding ISIS positions in Syria with airstrikes, and hunting for suspect Salah Abdeslam in connection with Friday's killings.
As usual, Anonymous members are quicker to respond to threats than investigators
That's because they don't have any requirement to perform due diligence or, well, investigate anything. Investigators do. Anonymous are more like instigators.
At least Anonymous has the advantage of being difficult for ISIS to target, unlike military or police forces, or even intelligence services operated by nation-states. How much they can actually accomplish remains to be seen.
How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
Do we actually think that some goatse trolling or whatever Anon has planned is even meaningful vs. crazy psychos who are beheading our soldiers, raping the women of their country, and crucifying/burning/etc. any Christians they can find?
they would sign up for the military and go bust some rear
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
implies that they had information about Daesh targets beforehand, but chose for some reason or another not to hit them before now. Because they sure hit them fast - the last I checked they hit over 30 targets in Raqqah today - they're not just suddenly discovering new things
Now why could that be - why would they have targets they weren't hitting? The only logical reason is that the combination of the value of the targets and their confidence in what they're hitting was lower than the risk of hitting innocent bystanders and fanning the flames of war. But now they've clearly made a different decision.
That doesn't mean that their course of action is inherently wrong. But it should be stated upfront that we're taking on more civilian risk/consequences in order to scale up the attack against them. I mean, France if they wanted could take the Russian route and drop (mostly unguided) munitions on anything that moves in a suspect area, or even the Assad route and pound their cities to rubble with barrels full of mining explosives. But what's the balance point of attack vs. protecting civilians - how much do you want to shift it in response to the Paris attacks?
And really, we all know this isn't going to be won from the air. So the real question is, how much weapons do you want to offload, to whom, how much do you actually trust them, what seeds for future conflict are you sowing... or conversely, dare you actually send in your own ground troops to do it yourself, into a conflict where half a dozen nuclear powers on different sides are uneasily circling each other?
Hello from Sputnik 2. I am receiving you.
IS will ignore Anonymous, military, cops, and intelligence services in favor of unsuspecting theatergoers and people out for an evening at a cafe. Military and cops shoot back, and Anonymous is simply impotent against an organization like IS.
Those ISIS guys better watch now! Anonymous will be sending a barrage of pizzas to them that they didn't even order, and probably posting some dick pics on the their websites!
Two weeks ago more people were killed on the russian plane. Where did these anonymous guys were at that time?
Anyone working with ISIS is not a "civilian" in the classic sense. I suppose there might be slaves who would be killed, but taking out a conventional city that ISIS wholly controls in a Dresden like firebombing is now perfectly acceptable. Women, children (who were destined to become ISIS cannon fodder or commanders anyway), all who work to support the ISIS infrastructure are fair game now, just as German cities were in the second world war.
And really, we all know this isn't going to be won from the air. So the real question is, how much weapons do you want to offload, to whom
Yes, totally right, only this will not be won by "offloading" anything - the U.S. tried that and spent hundreds of millions to train a handful of soldiers, who promptly joined ISIS when they were sent in.
ISIS will be hale and hearty right until the moment countries decide to get serious and send in troops to the regions ISIS holds. Only then will they at least slow down ISIS (though it may take quite a while after that before the whole group truly dissolves).
ISIS gives proof to the lie that if we just leave extremists alone they will leave us alone.
IS will ignore Anonymous, military, cops, and intelligence services in favor of unsuspecting theatergoers and people out for an evening at a cafe. Military and cops shoot back, and Anonymous is simply impotent against an organization like IS.
That depends on whether Anonymous plans do useless stuff like tear down ISIS websites or something useful like hack the PCs of ISIS leaders and steal their financial records or details of their oil smuggling operation which would be most useful to the military and the cops even if it would probably embarrass Turkish president Erdoan and his AKP party pretty severely but then they have it coming.
Is Anonymous planning on SWATing Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi? Or maybe they'll start a DDOS against an ISIS controlled city.
Seriously, what do these guys think they're gonna do? If they really wanted to have an impact, they could try outing cartel associates or something, but that might produce an actual physical (deadly) response for Anonymous members. ISIS will regard Anonymous as the complete non-threat that they are, and move on with their apocalypse-seeking killings.
By the way, what ever became of the much ballyhooed KKK membership release? I seem to recall that turning into a whole bunch of nothing, just like this, and most other Anonymous endeavors, are destined to become.
We will never be the change to the weather and the sea
Anonymous is not difficult to target. The Zetas drug cartel did it quite successfully.
Anonymous could do the most good by hacking into and diverting - or simply revealing, if nothing else is possible - the finances of ISIS. Is there any hackable digital money stream involved, or is at all greasy piles of cash?
I feel safer already...
IS is one of the largest threats to our way of life in the west, but we are thinking too small when we think of ways to combat it. They believe they are on a mission from God, bringing about the final reckoning between good and evil - the Apocalypse. We think of them as trouble-makers that need to be sorted out as painlessly as possible, a short-term problem that can be solved with conventional weaponry, with relatively small losses. They aren't.
How we respond to them is difficult to work out. Maybe the Anon approach of hacking and defacing their web sites - cutting off the oxygen of publicity - would be a Good Idea. It may be better than trying to pick the right targets out of the desert with smart bombs and drones. It might be better than turning the entire region into green, glowing glass.
One thing you can do is screw with their social media, make it look as if ISIS hates Allah and Mohammed, not in big ways that are obvious, but smaller that makes recruits stand back and second guess. Undermine their ability to recruit anyone and recruit money and they will crumble faster than 10,000 bombs can hurt them.
Sever their income, destroy their ability to recruit and communicate. and please do it decently instead of carpet bombing that gets a lot of innocents as well. redirect their bank accounts to supporting Israel or other groups they hate.
Reveal all their financial supporters, and feel free to drain their accounts as well.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Anon give France targets as well as the chatter that identified them in near real time. You are less bureaucratic than the intel services and can ID and confer intel faster. They have the fighter jets and ground assets.
The US is too toothless to attack those targets in near real time.
JJ
"Hey Mom? Can you send down a double order of hot pockets to the my basement apartment? I've vowed revenge on ISIS and can't get out to the grocery store this week." Which do you think will be more effective - hacking twitter accounts or dropping bombs on them?
Military and cops shoot back, and Anonymous is simply impotent against an organization like IS.
This really depends. How secure are French nuclear launch sites at present? How many members of the French military, at this point, would be inclined to simultaneously take a cigarette break/bathroom break, or otherwise look away? How many are, themselves, members of Anonymous? What kind of missile defenses does Dabiq, Syria currently have?
Are these the idiots who backed down when threatened by the cartels? Please! Bunch of fucking wimps! Morons...
hack the PCs of ISIS leaders
Which is bullshit. They need to hack the PCs of the national governments and corporations that finance them. To bring down ISIS means to bring down everything.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
Just brainstorming here, but you think we could hire the Zetas Cartel to go after ISIS?
You are welcome on my lawn.
It's the latest trend. The US nailed one in Afghanistan recently, Russia's hit nearly half a dozen since they started bombing Syria... come on, why can't France get in on the game? You know France doesn't like falling behind on trends. Maybe they're trying to start a new trend with bombing football stadiums?
It's unfortunate, but "suddenly coming up with three dozen targets to strike in one day" when the whole coalition had just been bombing a few per day recently means striking targets that have a higher risk of civilian death that you had previously decided not to hit.
Hello from Sputnik 2. I am receiving you.
Not sure, but that would make a great TV show.
Which ones might well be revealed by the records within the PCs of the leaders of ISIS. But good luck trying to find that information.
OTOH, bombing doesn't do that much good, either. It definitely convinces the population of the area bombed that you are the enemy. Many of them might well not have believed that before you dropped a bomb on their sister or at their uncle's funeral.
I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
The war has been going on for the last 18 months. The targets they hit were always there and it just happens to be a few days after the attack.
What a coincidence. I was going to say the same thing about you.
I don't think you realize how many bombs we drop every day. Just because you don't read about it on Fox News doesn't mean we're not doing it.
You realize that Raqqah is one of the largest cities in Syria, right? People there don't have a choice about "working with Dash".
I love your tone, when you are the one too stupid to realize how many parallels with Dresden you are describing... that didn't stop the bombing then, nor should it now. The people "working with" ISIS (I love your attempt to rename them by the way to make them sound more romantic and less monstrous than they really are) are in fact supporting the group, even if they do so under protest. They should either fight from within or leave my any means possible, including death. That Raqqah the city exists as a safe base is a huge recruiting tools; you get to keep your assigned wife and your government issued christian sex slaves in relative comfort at home while you go off to fight knowing your family/slaves are safe. Destroying the show city would show this to be an illusion and many would think twice before moving there afterward.
By saving a few hundred innocents you are condemning tens of thousands of innocents to death in the coming years, not to mention exacerbating the refugee crisis. But I guess you can rest easy with that.
And none of this changes the fact that piecemeal arming of militias will accomplish nothing of substance, any more than an air war alone will.
You needn't worry though since no government has the spine to do anything meaningful to attack islamic extremists, so Raqqah will carry on peacefully for many years, churning out support for murderers for many years to come. At least until the first nuclear attacks, the next inflection point where the countries may start to get serious.
apparently French investigators believe that ISIS communicates encrypted messages over the PlayStation 4 network.
So could Anonymous please take down Sony again, that'll help a lot, thanks!
(capcha: target. really!)
Serious peepz like the MAN used to tell us be careful what you do cuz your actions can f00k up frag1l3 sp00k capabilities. Sometimes low hanging fruit is allowed to remain that way on purpose.
what a relief ! we are all safe now that Anonymous is fighting IS.
what if they hacked the wrong syrian accounts(as usual), IS will kill the account holders anyway.
notice anonymous has fine sense of morality. it does not fight against terrorist attacks in non western countries . nor against drone killing of children by our heroes the military of west.
The U.S. chose to withdraw from both Iraq and Afghanistan (though in reality they only withdrew to Iraq, and stopped withdrawing from Afghanistan once they realized how badly they had screwed up Iraq by withdrawing way too soon).
Obama claims he had no choice but to withdraw, but he very much wanted to and you'd have to be an idiot to think we couldn't have stayed had we just asked. We should have at least asked.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
So now we know how many have to die before we take action. Sad that France was so inept at realizing the threat and now we learn a refugee was part of the attack. Go figure, the US will end up being just as inept as we continue to monitor over 900 potential terrorists? Gee, do we have to wait until they kill hundreds to get anything done? Heck we know where the leaders are of ISIS, we know the buildings, they are housed in, where they train, how come nothing has been done till hundreds were killed or wounded? WTF is wrong with our leaders anymore? Cowards is the word! Afraid to define evil when it stares right at you. Shame on our leaders. Blood is on your hands, kill evil before it kills us.
We bombed the crap out of Iraq, Osama bin Laden, and Saddam Hussein, have been killed, al Qedea has devastated. Those things did not prevent ISIS - they caused it.
This is just what Islam does.
Leave their countries alone, and keep them out of our countries. Then everybody in the mid-east can just get back to killing each other.
... look to Saudi Arabia !
...Why does anyone require 'due diligence' and fact-checking against insane violent assholes like these Sunni extremist fuckstains that laughingly call themselves the 'Islamic State'
People simply can *NOT* get radicalized out of a vaccuum
Most of the sunni moslems get radicalized from the teachings of their imams, from the hate filled sermons uttered by the imams on the pulpit inside the mosques all over the world, and from the teachings they received when they were studying their 'peaceful religions' inside the madrasa ... and most of the imams, the mosques, the madrasas of the sunni sect in the whole world are being funded by the oil money from Saudi Arabia
Every year the Saudis provide funding for all these programs, to the tunes of tens of billions of dollars --- yes, you read it right, TENS OF BILLIONS
This has been an open secret for decades
The government of the United States of America knows about Saudi's funding of radicalization of moslems
The governments of the European countries know about Saudi's funding of radicalizations of moslems
All the nations in the world know it too, but no one dare to tell Saudi Arabia to stop radicalizing the moslems because everyone needs their oil
It definitely convinces the population of the area bombed that you are the enemy. Many of them might well not have believed that before you dropped a bomb on their sister or at their uncle's funeral.
Fuck 'em.
I am really sick and tired of your lame attempt of hoodwinking people with _half-truths_
REAL FACT:
Over 86% of the moslems in this world live inside Moslem-majority countries
The largest group of moslems living in a non-moslem majority country are the moslems in India *about 8%*
2nd largest group of moslems living in non-moslem majority countries are moslems living in the West (EU, Canada, and USA) *about 3%*
3rd largest group of moslems living in a non-moslem majority country are the moslems in China*about 1.6*
The above 3 groups put algether amounts to less than 12.5% of the total number of moslems in the entire world
With more than 86% of the total number of moslems living in MOSLEM-MAJORITY COUNTRIES the likelihood that a moslem being killed by their fellow moslems is - of course - much higher than the likelihood of moslems being killed by non-moslems or the likelihood of non-moslems being killed by moslems
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
We hope Anonymous has a 100, or 1000 year plan to keep attacking their propaganda because, sadly, radical Islam is much more disciplined than any effort to combat them thus far. Sorry to say but REAL BOMBS and acceptable collateral damage must be accepted in this real WAR.
The way to fight guerilla warfare is to bring the game to them. Hide among the civilians and take them out. Hit them where they live, where they are most vulnerable. Overwhelm them 10x each time they hit us. Torture and behead their sorry asses whenever found, publicly. Do everything governments can't do officially. Kill them before they kill us.
Anonymous is the right group to do this.
All your text is very nice and explains why modern Christian societies are engaged in barbarism by and large, or at least not exporting it wholesale.
However it utterly ignores that Islam does not have all of these flavors of Islam as yet, it has the Koran and that is it.
What is the equivalent of the New Testament for Islam exactly? Can you point to who is following that? Or is it more the case that all you can do is point to people who follow only selected parts of the Koran, thus not really being muslims as the fundamental guidebook would have them be.
oil smuggling operation
The world has no more problem with ISIS smuggling oil than it did with Iraq smuggling oil.
Under ISIS (your relabeling to attempt to paint them as more relatable is pretty sickening) Christians are killed, as are Jews - that is, the ones not used as sex slaves.
The surrendering and paying taxes thing is pretty much for other sects of muslims.
...is hack as many ISIS-linked social media accounts they can get their hands on, and bombard their followers and feeds with the cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad from the Garland, Texas art display.
I'm pretty sure the problem should sort itself out after that.
The US already does a good job at recruiting for ISIS and similar organization with the drone strikes. Something like 80% or 90% of the victims of the drone attacks are innocent people. Also, there been news stories about the US doing double strikes where the rescuers get hit and killed. It is pretty easy to see that if you kill 2 correct people and 8 innocent people that the family of the 8 innocent would be new terrorists. What exactly would you do if the US killed your innocent: sister, brother, son, daughter, mother, father etc.? Would you forget about it or would you make it your life's mission to KILL as many US citizens?
For,I bet the front line Isis fighters are quaking in their boots knowing that a bunch of comfortable,white,western teenagers are going to go to war against them by attacking their i.t hardware...oh bugger,they don't have any and don't use modern com's for anything dealt important. Anon trying to make a story out of a non event,sad bastards,who have a greatly inflated idea of their own importance and effects.. I would be shutting myself knowing a bunch of third rate script kiddies are after me while I'm running around ducking bullets and shrapnel !!! Hard to pick between the two pairs of arrogant wankers,daesh or anon..
just a bunch of childish losers who need to get laid more often
I never thought I'd live to see the day when some random dipshit on slashdot would support ISIS.
We are Anonymous! We will DDOS your servers!
We are Anonymous! We will Dox you!
PH33R U$!!!
What? You'll shoot us, and others if we do this?
*Weird Al* I WAS ONLY KIDDING!
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
Free clue: ISIS is controlled by the CIA.
*eye roll*
Suuuure it is.
And the Moon landings were all faked.
And Kennedy was assassinated by his own government.
And the holocaust never happened.
And human-caused climate change is a conspiracy.
People like you single-handedly keep the tinfoil manufacturers in business, with all those hats you keep making out of the stuff. Do yourself and everyone around you a favor: Go take your meds, k?
They gave up quickly their little "war" against the Zetas, not that they would have made much of an impact anyway. Face it, "anonymous" is a bunch of socially shunned, rejected nerds out for their great "revenge", which they believe they can enact with their puny little computers. They will only muddle things up like a bunch of kids playing detective on a real crime scene, and nothing else. Time to round'em up, arrest them and smash their stupid machines.
That's because they don't have any requirement to perform due diligence or, well, investigate anything. Investigators do. Anonymous are more like instigators
Why does anyone require 'due diligence' and fact-checking against insane violent assholes ...
You find a connection to a person. Is that person a knowing participant - an unknowing "beard" providing cover for a participant, again, doing so unknowingly? Ex. going to clubs and bars and events as a friend. Is that person doing legal business with them, again, with no knowledge of the participants true plans? Ex Renting a room, renting a car, buying groceries, etc. If you don't investigate the connection you may falsely accuse someone of being a knowing participant. That sort of accusations shows up on page 1 in big print. The retraction and apology that follow later when the truth is discovered shows up on page 18 and in small print. Or for those that don't get the newspaper reference ... guess what shows up first when a prospective employer googles that person?
Just brainstorming here, but you think we could hire the Zetas Cartel to go after ISIS?
The Zeta Cartels are probably already keeping ISIS types away from the US border. The last thing they want is an ISIS type to infiltrate into the US across the southern border and get the US population interested in securing the border. The US southern border is safe. An ISIS type will come to the US on a student VISA from an EU country, or infiltrate the northern border after getting into Canada on a humanitarian basis.
If only France, the target of this terrorist attack, had some kind of elite military force composed (mostly) of foreigners... ;-)
The Legion is only necessary when the operation and its cost would be unpopular with the French public. I don't think any mission targeting ISIS would be very unpopular with the French. The entire French military is eligible for this one.
"In a more conventional response, the government of France has been bombarding ISIS positions in Syria with airstrikes"
If you believe that, I have the Pont Neuf to sell you. They are bombing syrian infrastructure to prevent the now almost victorious secular Assad regime from re-building the country. Remember that France was the one who started bombing Libya and it was shown on TV and is still visible on Youtube how a french secret service agent ritually sacrificed libyan leader Moammer el-Gadhafi. More than 200k libyan people then perished from armed violence in the country, which France, USA and UK pushed into total chaos. They imposed islamic fundamental gangs on the country to be able to steal its oil and gold reserves, the crime hidden among the noise of anarchy.
Similarly, in Syria, which was a french protectorate-colony between WWI and WW2, the so-called "moderate" syrian rebels (i.e. beheaders with with ISIL flag kept in the pocket, not hand) are brimming with french-made MILAN anti-tank guided missiles, FAMAS compact assault rifles and Manurhin grenade launchers. Meanwhile ISIL/ISIS, which holds control of several oil fields, are sending many tanker shiploads of crude to Europe and USA at 1/5th the market price. Conflict blood diamonds are old-fashioned, it is now blood-oil boom.
It is a matter of fact that satanism has become the governing force in USA ever since Dubya Bush came to power and has been wrecking havoc worldwide. The western european masonic vassals, UK, France, Italy merrily jumped on the bandwagon, hoping to rob their former colonies of all wealth and sacrifice hundreds of thousands of people to Osiris-Lucifer. Who is behind it all? Israel, which keeps the euro-atlantic powers on a lead. They want to become a zionist empire spanning from the Nile to the Euphrates. They want to destroy Iraq and Syria to gain territories, but distant countries like Libya and Iran also must go, since they supported the palestinian cause. After Israel becomes as big and powerful as the major european powers, other countries on other continents will be forcibly dismantled as well, for profit.
Who is going to stand up against the world conquest of satanism? The russians are evil themselves, violating the treaty againt Ukraine and conquering its territories, shooting down an airliner and threatening the independence of baltic states, which suffered so much genocide under soviet-russian communism. The current Pope is only interested in praising Israel. India, formerly a voice of non-aligned movement reason with Yugoslavia in the 1970-80s, is now only interested in obtaining US and israeli "wunderwaffe", hoping to wage war of conquest versus Pakistan. Some say mainland China is the only hope, but that country has such a terrible recent record of human sacrifice by the tens of millions under the disguise of "communist cultural revolution" that Satan is probably better than them. Brazil and South America is in deep crisis. Japan is stagnant and wastes her energy hating Korea and China. Who is the hope of salvation then?
Some philosophers actually say what is going on now on our planet is beyond satanism. Satan, while evil, is a strict ruler and keeps an evil order at least. What is being done now is the creation of total chaos on Earth, in the physical world and the electronic-virtual sphere as well as the moral-spiritual sphere. Some forces want everything to fall apart into a quantum-chaos state. They have many unwitting servants, from zionists to freemasons, from anarchist cypher-punks to satanists, but they will all become cannon-fodder when (if) the grand plan plays out.
The masonic empire of France is just one puzzle piece in the masterplan and the circa 130 dead in Paris are just a drop in the sea of blood in the vast ritual human sacrifice that has been going in many artificially instigated conflict places on Earth and will culminate in WW3.
Saving Private Perez, Part 2?
the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
"Everyone who does use HOSTS files (myself included) doesn't use your software" - by dave420 (699308) on Thursday November 05, 2015 @07:30AM (#50869743)
A small sampling of /.'ers say my work is good who use my hosts file engine quoted:
---
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
... apk
---
* So, what's that you said I have quoted above Dave420? LMAO... you FAIL as usual, again, vs. me!
APK
P.S.=> Do you have ANY idea how many of these I have bookmarked in your constant failures in trolling me, especially on hosts? 50 of them and the result is always like this one is - you say something I can put away with undeniable fact that proves you wrong... lol!
Thanks for making me look good, & yourself? Well - lmao, "not so good" (like the fool you are)... apk
This folks, this response that I'm replying to, is how you end up with continual conflicts.
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
"moslem"
I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
"Everyone who does use HOSTS files (myself included) doesn't use your software" - by dave420 (699308) on Thursday November 05, 2015 @07:30AM (#50869743)
Some /.'ers made you "eat your words": They use my hosts file engine saying it's good vs. your bullshit:
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
(LMAO... you FAIL as usual, again, vs. me!)
* What's that you said I have quoted from you above Dave420?
APK
P.S.=> Thanks for making me look good: You always say something I can put away with undeniable facts that prove you wrong... lol!
... apk
Inciting them further by defacing their websites with a picture of Mohammed being sodomized by his first wife (the rich widowed trader, who is where he got all his assets from, broke desert trash that he was,)
Or if you want to be REALLY incisive, make him performing oral sex on her. After all it's probably what he had to do to get her to marry him, right?
Captcha agrees! 'mounds'
Free clue: ISIS is controlled by the CIA.
I don't think you're going to have much luck charging for your clues.
I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
Actually, I do try to follow all of the daily sorties, using both official/international reports and ground reports. The rate of coalition attacks in Syria had been really falling recently.
For one who wants to pay attention, this conflict has actually been fairly easy to follow because the regime and various rebel factions usually roughly agree on ground truths (roughly). There's not much "Baghdad Bobbing" here.
Hello from Sputnik 2. I am receiving you.
So, what are they going to do? DDoS them? That will show them!
I remember Anonymous tried something similar with the Mexican cartels. Anonymous pussied out after Los Zetas threatened them with violence.
Stupid shit. How many American do you know who are pining to type a thorn? Perhaps you assume everyone's an American and watches Fox News? I can assure you that the person you relied to does not. You're a fucking ignorant cunt. I bet you were OUTRAGED with the US hitting a hospital. It's okay when France does it. Fucking twit. DIAF
You do know that Moslem is a correct spelling, right?
Beware CIA and Mossad, anonymous is coming for you, bawhahahaha.
One wonders what the response from the scriptkiddies would be if ISIS posted a Youtube saying they knew who the Anon members were and they were coming to get them. Given their record for doing real actual physical harm to people and not just taking websites offline or posting to Pastebin then the Anon mob are likely to find themselves running more scared than the ISIS mob are.
I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
It's all due to Israel's occupation, they are the real terrorists coming from the Middle East.
Anonymous doesn't like having competition.
If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
And how do you end this conflict? Go ahead, we all really want to know.
In places like ISIS' self proclaimed capital right now, "innocent civilians" are basically people being slaughtered by ISIS and people they are sitting idly by watching the slaughter and supporting ISIS passively instead of fighting back.
The former group is dead one way or another, and the latter isn't a group we should care that much about saving. They might just be incentivized to fight their captors if they know they aren't safe as human shields.
I suppose it's time to "dispel your notions"!
(OR rather, your attempts @ mocking me, since I can do that to YOU, easily metrix007 & you KNOW it, I know it, and everyone else can too now... I suppose I can let others know a few samples of it too now, fair enough?)
Here's only 1!
http://slashdot.org/comments.p... [slashdot.org]
(Should I post the rest? Just ask, I can & will upon request... I have, oh, another 8 or so on the EXACT same lines, you running from disproving my points on hosts files!)
Anyhow/anyways:
"My Name is Ozymandias: King of Kings - Look upon my works, ye mighty, & DESPAIR..."
(&, for work done for EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com on PAID CONTRACT (writing portions of their SuperCache program increasing its performance by up to 40% via my work) albeit, for their SuperDisk & HOW TO APPLY IT, took them to a finalist position @ MS Tech Ed, two years in a row 2000-2002, in its HARDEST CATEGORY: SQLServer Performance Enhancement).
GHOSTERY TRUTHS #2: 2012 -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... [slashdot.org]
"DEAR MR. GATES": 2012 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... [slashdot.org]
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation tax shield: 2012 -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme... [slashdot.org]
Colorblindness and camouflage: 2012 -> http://games.slashdot.org/comm... [slashdot.org]
HBGary and "Freedom of Speech" plus REAL NAMES on forums: 2012 -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... [slashdot.org]
Large Projects (millions of lines) vs. TINY ones (200k lines) & rewrite: 2012 -> http://developers.slashdot.org... [slashdot.org]
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2010 -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen... [slashdot.org]
APK SECURITY GUIDE (old one):2005 ->
* And, there you go...
APK
P.S.=> So much for your statement above, & that above? Only "scratches the surface" as far as computing + myself over time... apk http://linux.slashdot.org/comm... [slashdot.org]
OTOH, bombing doesn't do that much good, either. It definitely convinces the population of the area bombed that you are the enemy. Many of them might well not have believed that before you dropped a bomb on their sister or at their uncle's funeral.
Not that it matters much. If you bomb ISIS, the civilian casualties will be people who at least support ISIS. Those who did not support ISIS in their region are already dead - killed by ISIS. Might as well use a few nukes. Russians and Americans could agree on a number of nukes for each - and the French could drop one too.
The "correct" way of spelling something is the most common usage. The way you're spelling it is only common among people trying to make themselves feel superior by being a spelling hipster.
I am Anonymous,
It is vital in these respects to remain truthful, Truth is more powerful than made up tactics. To point out the impossibility of removing any religion despite desires of such is important. For example Putin is reported to have threatened to Nuke Mecca.That will not end the religion, however to point out the hypocrisy of a religion that is against idolatry yet has it's members facing towards a meteor in a box (Mecca) 3 times a day is the height of worshiping an idol - note that rock is not God. Perhaps the first group that halted Islam from taking Europe was the Templars, usually it is not considered politically correct to mention them however please allow to point out that they were an independent group - (that did as they wished), as is Anonymous, Hence a factor to consider. Read between the lines...
If Anonymous can help the good guys win the intelligence game against ISIS that all of civilization wins.
Bunch of stupid kids seeking glory from a tragedy. You shit nerds bashed your skulls open upon Amazon's security, and you want to take on terrorists? Do you remember when you announced "war" against the Zetas then crapped your diapers and went crying to mommy? News for you nerds: you were losers in high school and you are losers now. No amount of fake keyboard bravado will ever make up for the rightful humiliation you have been subjected to. You were shit, you are shit and you will always be shit. You are born to be stomped upon then be wiped from the soles of Real People. Now go pop those zits, you're disgusting.
... Anonymous is simply impotent against an organization like IS.
I'm not so sure, an Anonymous attack on ISIS would certainly interfere with their social media recruiting, release of the server access.log and error.log could easily provide numerous oppertunities to Law Enforcement or Intelligence, and not to mention the possibility of making an IT worker on the inside, who's sympathetic to Anonymous a lot easier to turn.
The thing about organisations like ISIS is they heavily depend on a few charismatic individuals to present their public face, which provides LE, Intel and Anonymous with high value targets like Mohammed Emwazi AKA "Jihadi John" to concentrate on.
Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
Revenge? How many Muslims will they kill?
The only "correct" way of spelling? Really? What you're saying is like claiming truth can only be determined by popular or prevalent belief.
To those who believe that this is somehow politically motivated, that religion has no part, that ISIS does not represent a plausible interpretation of Islam, I say bollocks.
ISIS simply wants to create a Islamic Caliphate within the levant. Unfortunately, they also want it to be ruled under Sharia law, and have decided to use methods and tactics proscribed straight out of their holy book. Their beliefs represent a clear and plausible interpretation of Islam, no one can deny it. You liberals can shout all you want that they aren't muslims, aren't Islamic, but you're just blowing hot air and using a "No true muslim" argument. It's hogwash.
The west, and more importantly moderate muslims, must fight this at an ideological level. These beliefs must be shown to be harmful to the greater worldwide society. We also have a moral imperative to treat everyone with dignity and respect, but at the same time call out those who have decided to run really bad software (extreme religious beliefs) in their heads, regardless of who they are.
I think it's time for another round of cartoons.
The problem with fundamental religion is the fundamentals
The problem with vigilante justice is the vigilantes
Although I support Anonymous' goals, I do not support their methods. If you want to change the system for the better, you must navigate within it to make it better. This is what civilized societies and people do. They change the rules USING the rules. This is true even if the system is corrupt, unfair, and rigged against you.
Yes, sometimes that will mean breaking the law, but even that should be done in a non-violent manner. Violence should always be your absolute last resort.
Unfortunately, lately, it seems violence seems to have become the default response (on both sides).
PS, we the CIA have inserted into all the aluminum foil produced antennas to rebroadcast the signals through the foil. Your tin foil hats have been rendered useless for decades!
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
I was with you till the last one...
CC (or AGW, or whatever the fuck they're calling it this week so that their name aligns with the latest information and doesn't contradict it) is simply a cash cow for "scientists", who shout down any who dare show opposing findings using the same data, rather than real scientists who collaborate with those who oppose their view to find what's called "the truth".
AGW is nothing but another conspiracy theory, used by the governments of the world to promote a fear in order to keep control of the citizens. That's it. Nothing more.
Not that I don't believe in being conscientious stewards of our planet, or that we should only burn coal and oil. I fully believe that we need to continue to find alternate energy sources, and clean up our act. But what I don't need is a bunch of assholes telling me that my carbon footprint is too large, while they fly around in their private jets and ride in limos. Fuck off, assholes, and use your money to fund research to find solutions to our energy problems.
See subject: Of your "assburgers outism"? It's that or you're blind (possibly illiterate)!
APK
P.S.=> Coren22 - look: I understand your stomach's upset from "eating your words" vs. myself due to your massive technical mistakes & lies but don't take it out on me - you did it to yourself... apk
See subject: Is take a look @ your post history and my posts beneath it to judge "what's-what" here, lol...
* :)
LOL! Since I watched "The Watchmen" this weekend, I finally figured out WHO you would be in that film: "Captain Carnage"... lmao!
(You can't HELP but fail vs. myself - it's getting to the point where I actually THINK you like it in fact!)
APK
P.S.=> Are you also a sado-masochist or what? apk
See subject: Where's a program you did yourself that anyone here says is good on /. predating that post of yours now, hmmm?
They do of my work, & that I'm correct on everything I say about hosts which nobody here manages to validly prove wrong either... funny that, eh?
APK
P.S.=> This I've got to see, lol - & IF there is (doubt it)? Can everyone say "sockpuppets by Coren22"?? LOL... apk
"Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015
Where'd I say it? I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...
See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there on OpenDNS free (I use it) + AD in my security guide.
+ Migrate hosts across a LAN (admin/scripts not GPO)-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
---
I'm RIGHT on admin priv + hosts (WFP/SFP)!
"figured out why privilege escalation's a bad thing?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015
How else can I programmatically update it?
---
"it requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015
Hypocrite later admits it!
Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS it or it can't do its job fully like many security tools!
Guess what?
Don't NEED to run my program as ADMIN - I do it here manually vs. auto.
---
"Needing admin privileges every time a program updates is poor design" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015
Users set it, not programmatic impersonation for autoupdate. You design zero & say what's what here?
---
"90's technology to fight modern war" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015
Ozymandias/Watchmen per a namesake:
"I resolved to apply antiquities teachings" (hosts) "to our world today & began my path to conquest - Conquest not of men but of the evils that beset them: Fossil Fuels (antispyware), Oil (antivir), Nuclear Power (addons) are like a drug & you gentlemen along w/ foreign interests are the pushers"
It works Aryeh Goretsky NOD32/ESET said hosts = good security-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Oliver Day (Symantec) too-> http://www.securityfocus.com/c...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts' Admin hosts+recommends APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit-> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
APK
P.S.=> Continued in #2/4... apk
"Virus scanners/Adblock software don't need admin priv to update" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
Stupid, neither does my program. AV does to remove threats - Adblock addons = VASTLY INFERIOR in abilities + efficiency vs. hosts as I've proven & no one proved me wrong to date!
---
"your software does" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
No, hosts do due to WFP/SFP!
---
"won't reveal your source code" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
I don't owe you it. I don't give away work to be stolen by others so it's misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...
---
"What's stopping you from pointing my bank's web site at your private server?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
I don't keep a server. You're a security guru (not - you create no ware for security & your forensics skills = non-existent): Put it in a VM, trace it using process monitor + wireshark to prove it (don't need code) & I only put in hardcodes of fav sites @ top of hosts for speed & reliabilty - you'd spot it easily & bulk of the file is sorted blocked known bad threat origins.
---
"the possibility of being caught, which would be pretty hard to catch w/ such a large hosts file, as no one can go through it manually." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
See just above!
---
"What are you going to do when Windows gets rid of the hosts file completely?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
Hasn't happened!
---
"They have already taken steps to make it useless in Windows 10." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
It still works there - who are you trying to fool other than yourself?
APK
P.S.=> To be continued in part #3/4... apk
quote> "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)
62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:
Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
&
Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...
---
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:
"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)
"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)
"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)
"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)
---
You tried using Computer Associates another antivirus I turned over on false positives (1/8 over time) & they were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...
Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap also) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!
* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!
APK
P.S.=> To be continued in part #4/4... apk
It's because we don't have bureaucracy to get in the way. But I assure you, we investigate things very carefully. For example,
These set of attacks, and the response does not make a lot of sense.
1. If you were in charge of ISIS and being bombed by the United States and Russia, would you launch an attack against France that would most likely respond by adding to the bombing of designated ISIS targets? If you wouldn't do that, then why do you believe they would?
2. The claims on CNN are that the terrorist originated in Syria but it was planned in Belgium. That was very quick information for them to come up with that. But let's assume it was true. The 9/11 attacks the attackers originated from Saudi Arabia, yet the U.S. attacked Afganistan. Clearly the country where people came from is not always to be the ones to blame, and If you were president Assad and if you really planned something like this, would you want it linked to your country? What if you are simply in Syria, but you were a terrorist; wouldn't you want it linked to some other country or area that would somehow benefit you and your people?
3. Ever since Obama wanted to invade Syria after the alleged chemical weapon use, and the American people would let him, ISIS suddenly pops out of nowhere, and gives Obama the excuse to go into Syria. I don't want to digress into the who created and supplies ISIS, but the United States was allegedly bombing ISIS, and then Russia comes in and does it (for real). The U.S. was against that, but when France entered the conflict, Obama supports it, so clearly the United States wants France in the conflict.
4. The intel identifying all the suspects and their origins and planning location came very quick, and I have no doubt reason to doubt this, as I would be capable of tracking this information down as well if I desired to do so; but France started bombing, and the United States is designating targets for them. Russia can't accidently hit one of their planes without bringing the entire E.U. into the conflict, so this clearly benefits Obama and his buddies.
5. Intel suggest this was a false flag attack. That is political actors wanted to bring France into the conflict, and so they inspired already disgruntled muslims to attack, and those individuals were too stupid to figure out it was a trick. The witnesses indicate the attackers spoke French as if it was their primary language. This adds to the final point; this false flag event originated in France.
The question is why would that happen?
1. The U.S. Dollar is collapsing, we have seen rock solid evidence of this.
2. Anonymous accurately predicted one of Obama's inner circle would be giving Interviews on this and as it turns out, within 3 days, that came true. in fact, Two of the four primary people gave the interview at the same time on CNN.
John McCain.
Lindsey Graham
Harry Reid
Diane Feinstein
Mitch McConnell
Nancy Pelosi
Joe Biden
Hillary Clinton
Eric Holder
Michael Bloomberg
George Soros
Barack Obama
George Bush
Bill Clinton
And of course the first two on the list were giving the interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4fWE23B0A0
3. Because the economy is collapsing, the NWO (New World Order) are attempting to maintain and expand their control by establishing a one world government, one world currency, all under control of a few. And to do this they need to make all the governments more similar. Fascism is the easiest form of government to establish from the existing types; Those countries with a radical different government are simply being destablized, which includes most of the Middle East. see the following.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8YtF76s-yM
4. So for various reasons I won't go into in order to keep this brief, the U.S. is bombing in Syria, and Russia enterend the conflict (invited by Syria)
4. So how does it apply to the attacks in France? Countries are positioning themselves politically and militarily fo
"but rather than take my advise on various things, he feels that he is allowed to defame me by saying things he knows are not true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)
Hypocrite, I show you're projecting in my posts & your signatures about me does the rest. What "advice" can you, an INFERIOR to me, like yourself give?
"I have offered him advise on ways to improve what he does to reduce the feeling of icky his software - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)
I've shown /.'ers say differently by their quoted testimonials - Show us you've done better: YOU can't - & you're "advising"? Talking out your ass on things you haven't done is what you're doing.
"posting them so often that maybe, just maybe, someone will think they are true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)
Quotes of you are true! You can't keep your word as you're replying to me yet again + projecting what I prove YOU do (AD/DNS lie).
"I don't have time for the Troll APK, and refuse to respond anymore to a post signed APK" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015 @04:27PM (#50858983)
No troll. I protect users for free w/ a program that speeds them up, helps reliability, & even anonymity online w/ more abilities & efficiency than ANY other 1 solution doing more w/ less - do you? No.
"Maybe I should change my signature again just to rile him up some more." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015 @10:07AM (#50855451) FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
"Rile" me? Childish sig bs is all you've got!
"I have repeatedly refuted his assertions - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)
BS - See my last 4 posts here!
APK
P.S.=>
"I never admitted you were right" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)
You PROVE I AM FOR ME part #1-#4 of your "Greatest Hits Fails"... apk
I really, REALLY do not get it... thank you, Anonymous, for taking aim against these creatures... but why would it take the Paris attacks to spur you to action?! The whole world would have appreciated timelier response on this... like, YEARS ago. And the Taliban and al Qaeda, too, for that matter.
Actually people there would have get an idea to avoid those bases. By the way, maybe those commander in ISIS get an idea changing place? And some knows that but do not talk about it, because they need to do something?
You've got to be kidding me! By that logic, Germany's invasion of Poland was nobody's business, and France and England should've stayed out of it. In actual fact, the opposite of your logic is true. Fucktards like you that push for isolationism just end up making things worse. As soon as some dick head like Saddam starts messing around, the entire UN should respond with bombs and bullets until that dick head is dead. Make sure it's known that aggressive behaviors like Saddam's invasion of Kuwait result in death, no exceptions. But when you ignore these small wars by tiny countries, you end up with disasters like Syria is right now.
Depends how thorough you are.
If you don't believe me, ask a Tazzie Abbo.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Well, rather those ordinary people in Russia do not really care, like most people with good life do not care. And Russian TV send propaganda. If do not really care, you will believe and support Putin.
Mainly so you don't accidentally kill the neighbor of the insane extremist
The cat's WAY out of the bag on that one. Did you know that the US government actually has a numerical limit (greater than zero) up to which the killing of innocents is entirely acceptable?
Exactly like that, except for it actually applies to the English language.
Dictionaries don't define words, they simply enumerate what words are used and the most popular spelling(s) of the words.
Dumbass.
"nigge"
You had your chance to take down ISIL, but you were wasting time on knuckle dragger (KKK) who had been legislated into obscurity via anti-vilification laws.
Far more useful on hacking those computers would be to change intelligence or orders, such that they attack fortified and prepared positions, or . . .
hawk
>interfere with their social media recruiting,
Say, by revealing that 30% of the time, that the wives, sisters, and mothers of ISIS recruits are raped while gone? That their sons are frequently subject to homosexual rape and captured to raise swine? And that ISIS leadership is hiding this from the world?
hawk
"dumbass"
Learn English, dumbarse.
*yawn*
Perhaps they're not so much supporting ISIS as refusing to support another dipshit who thinks, just like ISIS, that *their* way is the best way.
Sure, why not. Then they are propably already doing some sort of business together. That's how world seems to work.
...is to disintegrate their main funding source: Saudi Arabia.
So Anonymous should be targeting them, as well as publish everything about those that do business with them and help keep their royals in power.