> The only people complaining about the art style Me!
> are the ones who would buy anything Blizzard boxes. Also me!
It's true. I'm concerned it won't be as neat as it could be but in the end I trust Blizzard to make a great game well worth the money and not crippled with computer-breaking DRM*. It's why I own [at least] one copy of every Blizzard game I've played.
Maybe, but I'm still against the false sense of security these "anti-phishing" tools provide. And although I see it may be a necessary evil, it bugs me how many legitimate sites are going to be burned by this.
We need to educate users to check the URL before entering anything. Any time you rely on a technological solution to a social problem you end up with woes.
Don't need to. If they couldn't find hte first guy, just grab one of the random/b/tards who was dumb enough to login from the info posted and claim he was the original.
I seem to recall something about a Novell-MS dealbreaker being in the GPLv3 that, if adopted by the kernel itself, would mean a lot of fireworks, but I might be thinking of something else.
I'm definitely not talking about the Tivoization clause.
It's development software; new innovative software tends to be one platform, generally whatever the devs are most comfortable with. I don't know a thing about windows software engineering since early xp, but if I make something cool enough for linux someone else will probably be interested in porting it.
Video processing is commonly done on non-windows platforms because then you don't need a per-computer license for each node in the render farm, and FOSS software can follow an edl as easily as the proprietary stuff that created it. Maybe that's what bbc is using?
Number 2 doesn't exist. There are no competing ISPs in most areas. Wake up and smell the socialism.
Does anyone have any non-biased proof that BT is the main reason for congestion? I thought that was just marketing fud, it seems like digital cable and such is going to be a much larger slice of the pie. Still, I'm willing to believe it's BT.
You're being sold a product at a price where both are known in advance. Competition and lack of government established monopoly would be nice, but this is a better solution.
Now if only we had net neturaility laws to ensure that Comcast OnDemand counts toward the limit...
Slashdot Mirror
Web of trust similar to FMS on Freenet? I claim this will reduce spam dramatically, not eliminate it.
I have full confidence in the IRS's ability to protect me from other groups seeking to take my money. Especially ones that take it tax deductibaly.
Feel free to buy a CD. This is fine by me.
Never played it. I forgot I deleted the part about the ones I play. I was quoting the parent for effect and being accurate later. Sorry;)
> The only people complaining about the art style
Me!
> are the ones who would buy anything Blizzard boxes.
Also me!
It's true. I'm concerned it won't be as neat as it could be but in the end I trust Blizzard to make a great game well worth the money and not crippled with computer-breaking DRM*. It's why I own [at least] one copy of every Blizzard game I've played.
Maybe, but I'm still against the false sense of security these "anti-phishing" tools provide. And although I see it may be a necessary evil, it bugs me how many legitimate sites are going to be burned by this.
We need to educate users to check the URL before entering anything. Any time you rely on a technological solution to a social problem you end up with woes.
Oh so you support child porn? The kid's not of age...
You use that evidence to track him, other evidence to prove guilt.
Your computer can break a tripcode in Not Very Long (minutes-hours).
Don't need to. If they couldn't find hte first guy, just grab one of the random /b/tards who was dumb enough to login from the info posted and claim he was the original.
You're still grabbing a felon.
So I doubt it's technically possible to download 3GB in a single day, but for doing so over the air, that seems like an extremely good price to pay.
though I'd rather pay that per-byte price on any amount I download:-)
I'd suggest switching to a provider that lets you create virtual card numbers, so if they ever pull this again you can simply cancel the "card".
I'll console myself by watching YouTube and not having to incriminate myself by turning over encryption keys for no reason.
By the time those are illegal here I imagine the UK will require the Implants.
> Obama is a gun control freak
Lie requires source or retract.
He will likely support gun control then not do anything. It's not one of his central issues, so I hardly think one can call him a freak.
Of course if freak := disagree with you than I apologize for calling your statement a lie, for it is then correct.
When you put it that way it doesn't sound too bad at all. I didn't realize they'd be making my service faster.
Youtube doesn't kill people. Google kills you, except in Soviet Russia.
I seem to recall something about a Novell-MS dealbreaker being in the GPLv3 that, if adopted by the kernel itself, would mean a lot of fireworks, but I might be thinking of something else.
I'm definitely not talking about the Tivoization clause.
Yeah I realized that after I wrote this:-) I meant Theora. Oopsie.
It's development software; new innovative software tends to be one platform, generally whatever the devs are most comfortable with. I don't know a thing about windows software engineering since early xp, but if I make something cool enough for linux someone else will probably be interested in porting it.
Video processing is commonly done on non-windows platforms because then you don't need a per-computer license for each node in the render farm, and FOSS software can follow an edl as easily as the proprietary stuff that created it. Maybe that's what bbc is using?
Just a guess
Exactly, Matroska is great and all from a freedom standpoint, but technically it's far behind the encumbered ones.
At least we have ogg for audio, it seems like nothing can beat it in terms of quality/bitrate:-)
Isn't that clause new to the GPLv3?
from taking advantage of the lack of law to loot store after store of intellectual property over bittorrent and other such pirate protocols?
This is clearly any responsible government's first concern! I'm outraged they are concerned with "bandwidth management"!
Number 2 doesn't exist. There are no competing ISPs in most areas. Wake up and smell the socialism.
Does anyone have any non-biased proof that BT is the main reason for congestion? I thought that was just marketing fud, it seems like digital cable and such is going to be a much larger slice of the pie. Still, I'm willing to believe it's BT.
You're being sold a product at a price where both are known in advance. Competition and lack of government established monopoly would be nice, but this is a better solution.
Now if only we had net neturaility laws to ensure that Comcast OnDemand counts toward the limit...