Slashdot Mirror


User: smash

smash's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,084
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,084

  1. Re:I have a question about this - seriously on IE7 Bugs and Reviews · · Score: 1
    What you're missing is that IE7 is Windows only (yes, there's a mac version, but its hardly supported as well - and I doubt there's IE7 for Mac any time soon).

    If you can ensure that 90% of users on the net need IE7 to view a decent quantity of content properly, you can maintain your Windows monopoly - they need IE, they need a Windows box to run it on.

    As you say, there's no money in the browser - however, there's more to web marketing than popup ads.

    smash.

  2. shhh! on Running Windows With No Services · · Score: 1
    I think we just discovered the Windows Vist "security" features.

    smash.

  3. Re:CD Purchases on Challenging Music Downloading Myths · · Score: 1
    There was a proposal to tack a $4 or so dollar a month fee onto broadband connections to pay licensing for any music downloaded. That would have been nice.
    Thats a clusterfuck.

    Why should everybody have to pay for downloading music tracks, when they don't necessarily download music?

    Example: I don't download audio tracks, not because I'm necessarily opposed to it, but simply because there's very little media that I actually want to waste my time and bandwidth on... there's even less incentive for media companies to bother with original content if they've got a guaranteed source of income via broadband whether people even download it or not...

    The thing is, placing a "tax" on broadband connections for a un-related service is wrong. Why don't we add a movie tax, a gaming tax, and a newspaper tax while we're at it, for all the other media companies who are "losing" money?

    But yeah, price tracks reasonably, and online sales will skyrocket.

    I agree with another poster. The recording industry is due for one hell of a shake up... in future its likely to be buy direct from the artist...

    smash.

  4. Re:Little Point Learning Perl If Not Already Learn on Learning Perl, 4th Ed. · · Score: 1
    Erm.... I just started learning perl this week to administer active directory.

    The win32 modules shit all over vbscript or command scripts for messing with AD :D

    So there's a use for people who don't know it yet - i'm sure there's plenty more.

    smash.

  5. crap comparison on The Top CPUs Under Linux · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Did the benchmarker play with make -j arguments to enable the compile to take advantage of multiple cores?
    2. Did the reviewer try splitting the povray renders into sections, to render concurrently on multiple cores (as povray has been able to do since at least 1993).

    Picking, or limiting benchmarks to a single thread when testing multiple core/multiple virtual cpus per core is retarded.

    smash.

  6. thankyou captain obvious... on Doomed: How id Lost Its Crown · · Score: 1
    ... I for one do not know anyone who buys id games for the game.

    You buy them for the engine, and the mods.

    smash.

  7. Re:I don't run a firewall on Tear Down the Firewall · · Score: 1
    You let ssh in from anywhere?

    Oh, ok. :D

    Granted, apache may not have been the best example though...

    smash.

  8. Re:Go ahead and protest... it's YOUR tax dollars on Australia's 'e-tax' Windows Only · · Score: 1
    Erm...

    My Bank (NAB australia) uses cross platform banking software. It does warn that it *may not* work if you aren't using netscape or IE, but it will still let you run it anyway, and it does work in other browsers.

    I don't see anything that would preclude the ATO software from running on an open platform as well.

    smash.

  9. Re:I don't run a firewall on Tear Down the Firewall · · Score: 1
    So when something like, oh... I don't know... this happens, or perhaps this happens, you're screwed, right? :)

    smash.

  10. Re:Petition to tear down your firewalls! on Tear Down the Firewall · · Score: 1
    Scared to post your public, internet visible IP?

    smash.

  11. Re:heh brings me back on Tear Down the Firewall · · Score: 1
    Just because your home/personal use gentoo machine is not targetted by anyone serious, and therefore has not been hacked, doesn't mean that no one else:

    • needs NFS, telnet, and other insecure protocols to support applications required to conduct their business
    • has data worth millions of dollars

    smash.

  12. Re:Hear hear! on Tear Down the Firewall · · Score: 1
    *should* be yes.

    In reality, software is buggy. "So i'll just go open source then, and fix it myself" you say...

    Good luck. There's still plenty of holes in Linux, the BSDs, etc found every year.... and thats not even taking into account configuration errors.

    I think of it like this: In theory, seat belts and airbags on your car should not be required, because people should be able to drive, your brakes should work, and your car should be 100% reliable. In reality, that just doesn't happen.

    smash.

  13. egress filtering? on Tear Down the Firewall · · Score: 1
    So what does he do about egress filtering?

    I don't trust *any* o/s to *never* be hacked - given that, it makes sense to make sure that *when* it is... the damage is contained...

    smash.

  14. Re:Ontological argument on U.S. Scientists Create Zombie Dogs · · Score: 1
    Of course I could be happier - thats what makes me get up and go to work in the morning to improve my situation.

    Then again, none of those who go to church that I know of are "truly" happy either.

    Murder, rape, etc has nothign to do with religion. I've seen just as many religious murderers/rapists/etc as not.

    Religion isn't vital. Its just what you've been conditioned to believe.

    smash.

  15. Re:TCP and UDP not performance sensitive ? on Examining ICMP Flaws · · Score: 1

    NOT inter-twined, i mean...

  16. Re:TCP and UDP not performance sensitive ? on Examining ICMP Flaws · · Score: 1
    Hey, i'm not saying I necessarily agree with the idea.

    Don't get me wrong, I think it probably *does* belong in the Kernel.

    My point isn't that its so inter-twined with IP that its impossible...

    smash.

  17. Re:ICMP flaw #1 on Linux: it's in the kernel on Examining ICMP Flaws · · Score: 1
    OK correction:

    ICMP is not sent at the rate that TCP or UDP are.

    How about you get less aggressive, and go get laid or something.

    smash.

  18. Re:ICMP flaw #1 on Linux: it's in the kernel on Examining ICMP Flaws · · Score: 1, Interesting
    It sits on top of IP yes (layer 4).

    Put IP in the kernel, put TCP and UDP in the kernel (also layer 4, but performance intensive), move ICMP out?

    smash.

  19. Re:ICMP flaw #1 on Linux: it's in the kernel on Examining ICMP Flaws · · Score: 0
    TCP and UDP are often used in high bandwidth/low latency scenarios.

    ICMP isn't.

    smash.

  20. Re:ICMP flaw #1 on Linux: it's in the kernel on Examining ICMP Flaws · · Score: 1
    Actually, I'd much rather just update icmpd than recompile my kernel :D

    smash.

  21. bloated on Fedora Core 4 Reviewer Finds It Bloated · · Score: 2, Insightful
    For all intents and purposes it *is* bloated.

    And no, i'm not talking about memory usage - 4 CDs worth, and it didn't even detect/include apps for power management on my laptop.

    Wtf? This is 2005...

    Ubuntu detected everything, gave me fully working power management, etc as standard.

    The package manager is brain-damaged... rather than installing from CDs in sequence, adding/removing packages after install results in swapping CDs several times (ie, CD1 is requested 2-3 times or more), rather than loading everything it needs from CD1 first, etc.

    It looks pretty, but as far as use goes, its crap, imho.

    smash (Linux user since 1996)

  22. Re:Firewall or IPS? on What is the Best Firewall for Servers? · · Score: 1

    Actually.... my BSD/Linux firewall machines *dont* pass requests directly through to IIS. They're run through a few regex rules in squid reverse proxy first :) smash.

  23. Re:Ontological argument on U.S. Scientists Create Zombie Dogs · · Score: 1
    This is exactly why the church is so against stuff like this.

    Don't get me wrong, I think religion had its place back when people couldn't read or write and needed a story with morals to keep them on the straight and narrow.

    But thats all religion is. A *story* with *morals* that was easy to pass from generation to generation as a guide on how to live.

    Its largely obsolete now.

    smash.

  24. Re:This world is truly in a downard spiral on U.S. Scientists Create Zombie Dogs · · Score: 1
    OK, so you don't believe in life saving medicine.

    Fine, don't expect any medical treatment for severe injuries or disease.

    Don't expect CPR.

    Because after all... medical treatment is messing with life and death.

    smash.

  25. hmmm on Windows Longhorn and Internet Explorer 7 · · Score: 1
    So... its got tabs, and a search box.

    Yay. Where did the other 4 years of development go?

    smash.