Fox is objectively worse then MSNBC, or any other news show. There is a reason it can't be called News in Canada. Why Rupert change what the show is depending on the court case. Sometime sit's news, and sometime sit's entertainment.
Which isn't to say MSNBC can't be better. AS far a political reporting goes, NPR is the best. Yeah, yeah, someone is going to scream liberal, but I have been paying attention to the questions they ask any politician, and the difficulty of the question is the same for any politician.
Stop it. Common carrier has nothing to do with the issue you talk about. The NSA can already get all the data it wants. Common carrier will not make it worse.
Why? Common carrier has work excellently. They issue the poster brings up is a separate issue. DO you think they won't do that regardless of common carrier? Actually Common Carrier protects citizens to a small degree from how corporation just turn over data.
I see you have falling into the pub strategy. They stop everything he wants, then blame him for not doing anything. BTW, he has talked about this before, many times.
You should actually go through his terms and look at what he wants and the stupid shit the pubs did to stop it.
Because the pubs use FUD to get what they want, not logic, science or whats could for the common person. Remember they are the group that still backs trickle down, even though i' proven not to work. How? by using the fear of people loosing their jobs.
what? the engine room was one of the smartest things he did. TOS engineering room could in no way support everything 430 people would need on a 5 year mission.
Get involved on the government. As far as solar goes, pointing the panels WEST means more energy is generated during peak hours; which is more beneficial over all the trapping the maximum light. Winding up power plants to peak use a tremendous amount of power.
The threats were not serious." how the fuck do you know that? YOU can't, so stop making shit up. DO I really need to hold you hand to teach you how to use google to see the myrids of attacks that has happened after threats where made?
"Would they actually go and DO something physical? Of course not - " Yes, some will. Listen, you are completely ignorant of human nature, you have no clue about how people build up to taking an action, and you really need to stop stalking about it until you have read up.
"Who cares is some coward has your address? Really?" because they can work up the courage to take action.
"But doesn't there come a time when you should stop feeding them by showing how seriously you take them? " That did not work. They only used silence as a tool to get more aggressive. Not feeding the trolls does not work.
"Even if caught, the prepubescent boys trolling her aren't going to end up in jail over this." most of them(probably none) aren't prepubescent boys. As a rule, they have better things to do.
A) Why do you think they are teenage? B) Anon death threats should be taken seriously regardless of who they are from. C) Why is people being driven out of there homes, and getting dozens of death threats a joke toy you? D) A group is specifically targeting people with death threats. This isn't a lone person.
Your knowledge on this topic is nonexistent, and just perpetuate the incorrect view that only teens make death threats and they are meaningless.
" are likely 12 and 13yrs old and couldn't get convicted anyway" sadly, it starting to look like that are adults doing this. That said, a court could harder them not to use the internet for a year.
Slashdot Mirror
I've never seen a cat lady I'd want to sleep with.
Or you aren't thinking it through because it's infecting you.
Fox is objectively worse then MSNBC, or any other news show.
There is a reason it can't be called News in Canada. Why Rupert change what the show is depending on the court case. Sometime sit's news, and sometime sit's entertainment.
Which isn't to say MSNBC can't be better.
AS far a political reporting goes, NPR is the best.
Yeah, yeah, someone is going to scream liberal, but I have been paying attention to the questions they ask any politician, and the difficulty of the question is the same for any politician.
Stop it. Common carrier has nothing to do with the issue you talk about.
The NSA can already get all the data it wants. Common carrier will not make it worse.
Why? Common carrier has work excellently. They issue the poster brings up is a separate issue. DO you think they won't do that regardless of common carrier?
Actually Common Carrier protects citizens to a small degree from how corporation just turn over data.
I see you have falling into the pub strategy.
They stop everything he wants, then blame him for not doing anything.
BTW, he has talked about this before, many times.
You should actually go through his terms and look at what he wants and the stupid shit the pubs did to stop it.
Because the pubs use FUD to get what they want, not logic, science or whats could for the common person. Remember they are the group that still backs trickle down, even though i' proven not to work. How? by using the fear of people loosing their jobs.
No. the Dems have backed an open internet since it's inception.
Prices went UP, not down, and the airline quality dropped significantly.
He did. Maybe you should pay attention?
Maybe you should have read the whole thread? He corrected himself 2 minutes before you posted.
Type II is also genetic.
You need to get caught up.
You don't need a large batter set up. You need a way to store the energy. And chemical battery is only one way to do that.
what? the engine room was one of the smartest things he did.
TOS engineering room could in no way support everything 430 people would need on a 5 year mission.
Get involved on the government.
As far as solar goes, pointing the panels WEST means more energy is generated during peak hours; which is more beneficial over all the trapping the maximum light. Winding up power plants to peak use a tremendous amount of power.
don't seem to know what escalation is.
Whats wrong with the shape? do you think it's not aerodynamic enough for space?
this takes me back to /. during the 90's.
Sooo who are we pouring hot grits on now?
The threats were not serious."
how the fuck do you know that? YOU can't, so stop making shit up. DO I really need to hold you hand to teach you how to use google to see the myrids of attacks that has happened after threats where made?
"Would they actually go and DO something physical? Of course not - "
Yes, some will. Listen, you are completely ignorant of human nature, you have no clue about how people build up to taking an action, and you really need to stop stalking about it until you have read up.
"Who cares is some coward has your address? Really?"
because they can work up the courage to take action.
"But doesn't there come a time when you should stop feeding them by showing how seriously you take them? "
That did not work. They only used silence as a tool to get more aggressive.
Not feeding the trolls does not work.
Well, ignoring death threats didn't work.
And the only one changing realities is gamergate themselves.
"Even if caught, the prepubescent boys trolling her aren't going to end up in jail over this."
most of them(probably none) aren't prepubescent boys. As a rule, they have better things to do.
"... it's ridiculous and does not understand what journalism is..."
absolutely correct.
A) Why do you think they are teenage?
B) Anon death threats should be taken seriously regardless of who they are from.
C) Why is people being driven out of there homes, and getting dozens of death threats a joke toy you?
D) A group is specifically targeting people with death threats. This isn't a lone person.
Your knowledge on this topic is nonexistent, and just perpetuate the incorrect view that only teens make death threats and they are meaningless.
Which in no way changes the point.
They are illegal anywhere against anyone.
" are likely 12 and 13yrs old and couldn't get convicted anyway"
sadly, it starting to look like that are adults doing this.
That said, a court could harder them not to use the internet for a year.