yep, the middle mans job is to offer a service that the manufacture can't or doesn't want to do. Usually due to cost. If that cost goes away, so do middlemen. From what I have read, manufacture owned dealers in the past were always better for consumers then private owned dealerships.
This is akin to not allowing digital books because they hurt book stores.
Yes, constant compromise and calling out the stalling tactics of the pubs. Yeah, that sure is polarizing.
That just goes against what his real ideology is IMHO." You opinion is counter to pretty much every topic he has brought up. He constantly reaches across the isle. It's take to to shake hands... unless you are Bill the galactic hero.
try to use some facts when forming an opinion. How is constantly communicating and trying to compromise divisive? The pubs have refused to compromise and have constantly talked brought in irrelevance and non sequitors on every topic. If thing don't go there way? they use a filibusterer. If 92% of the population want something, they ignore them.
If you were on a site then general revolve around politics, that question would be relevant. That wouldn't mean everyone would find that question interesting. You don't find an interviews discussing the two biggest influence in the tech market interesting, and that's fine. Saying that it doesn't belong, or that no one will care about it on a tech site is ludicrous at best, selfish at the worst.
No, the goal post moves. What google does to day? would have been considered AI 25 years ago. You are surrounded with devices that meet AI definition a few decades ago. Every time we solve a problem, it gets removed from AI.
A lot of progress has gotten made, the fact that you don't know anything about it doesn't change that fact.
"Slusser professor of philosophy at U.C.Berkeley "
He is their because of his brilliant 'speech acts'. That doesn't mean everything he claims is correct.
Claiming that you can't mimic physical properties in a computer is flawed. He elevates consciousness to a level that can't be understood or recreated for no reason other then it's what he wants it to be. It's like talking a a philosopher 150 years ago about the behavior of the stomach. The would claim it the stomach couldn't be understood, and that we will never understand the transition of food to life. Yes, those where actual debates.
Now we can simulate a pattern of the brain, and get brain like responses. This shoot a really big hole into Searl's argument..of wait, he moved the goal post regard Consciousness.
"The goal of the philosopher is to lay out what intelligence "is". " no. It's a science question. Modern Philosophers answer nothing. The keep asking the same question even though they have been solved, or renders relevant by science.
Modern Philosophy goes no where and is riding on the coat tails of philosophers from a time when they actually did math and science. They have the delusion that anything they think of is valid, and that they can make things up. You want to watch some people wank around of an answerable question? great, listen to philosophy talk. You want to listen to to people argue over something science has already answered? great listen to philosophy talk.
You want to watch people figure something out? get scientists and engineer.
All the relevant parts of Philosophy has been cut up and given to specific branches of study Philosophy is the homeopathy of scientific thinking. Diluted to nothing and useless, but still manage to lure the gullible.
Worse then lost, it's change. Surprising fact: the more you recall an event form you life, the more likely it is wrong. Hell, saying the right sentence can make you think of seeming unconnected thoughts.
IT's only a cult if it doesn't work but you keep doing it. Had the native gotten into their copies of the planes, and they worked it wouldn't have been a cargo cult.
Observing something and then trying to recreate it with rigor and controlled conditions is called science. It's pretty nifty, you should look into it.
Some people actually copy neural mapping of a tiny piece of the brain. It function as if it is part of the brain.
Why is this a cargo cult? They copied part of the brain and it works. If the made a copy of the brain and it didn't work, then it would be a cargo cult.
Not only do you not seem to now what a cargo cult is, you also seem to be about 2 decades behind in research.
The whole article is about how this is working and being put into place.
Well it does apply in this case. a it turns out the small neural networks copied for the brain, actually act like a human brain. So it looks like, at this point, we can build a simulation of the brain without understand the 'mind' properties of the brain. The difference between human intelligence and a human intelligent computer system is computer power, nothing more.
Slashdot Mirror
No it wasn't.
"Until it does, it's vapour-ware to increase sales."
I don't think you know what vapor-ware is.
It's not their fault you use an inferior device.
3 - I have always hated that one, becasue it's wrong. It's been wrong since the scientific method was put into place.
I can see a floating disk and know it's science and engineering that created it. In fact, we could use that to figure out how it works.
Not understanding something doesn't mean it's magic.
Lie you ignored the article? And nothing i that link shows they are using it to build a supercomputer.
yep, the middle mans job is to offer a service that the manufacture can't or doesn't want to do. Usually due to cost.
If that cost goes away, so do middlemen.
From what I have read, manufacture owned dealers in the past were always better for consumers then private owned dealerships.
This is akin to not allowing digital books because they hurt book stores.
TO make money in order to support long term efforts on the charity.
You're world view is..simplistic to say the lease.
Yes, constant compromise and calling out the stalling tactics of the pubs. Yeah, that sure is polarizing.
That just goes against what his real ideology is IMHO." .. unless you are Bill the galactic hero.
You opinion is counter to pretty much every topic he has brought up. He constantly reaches across the isle. It's take to to shake hands.
try to use some facts when forming an opinion.
How is constantly communicating and trying to compromise divisive? The pubs have refused to compromise and have constantly talked brought in irrelevance and non sequitors on every topic. If thing don't go there way? they use a filibusterer.
If 92% of the population want something, they ignore them.
Hitler? seriously?
If you were on a site then general revolve around politics, that question would be relevant. That wouldn't mean everyone would find that question interesting. You don't find an interviews discussing the two biggest influence in the tech market interesting, and that's fine. Saying that it doesn't belong, or that no one will care about it on a tech site is ludicrous at best, selfish at the worst.
right now some EE at intel has read you post and is slapping his forehead. Why didn't we address the heat? of my, oh my.
I wouldn't call it very bad. In fact, in some circuits they are useful.
If it could get enough power to power a cordless keyboard, you could make millions.
Gosh, if it's was 2.4V that would be fine, to bad it's not..oh wait, yeah, 2.4 volts, it's right in the pdf, not 12 volts.
"but I don't see how... "
that's because you didn't look.
" my experience in electrical engineering says"
and the sentences says you don't have a lot of experience.
It's going to be smaller and use less energy.
No where? HAHAHAHAHahahaha.
No, the goal post moves. What google does to day? would have been considered AI 25 years ago.
You are surrounded with devices that meet AI definition a few decades ago.
Every time we solve a problem, it gets removed from AI.
A lot of progress has gotten made, the fact that you don't know anything about it doesn't change that fact.
"Slusser professor of philosophy at U.C.Berkeley "
He is their because of his brilliant 'speech acts'.
That doesn't mean everything he claims is correct.
Claiming that you can't mimic physical properties in a computer is flawed.
He elevates consciousness to a level that can't be understood or recreated for no reason other then it's what he wants it to be.
It's like talking a a philosopher 150 years ago about the behavior of the stomach. The would claim it the stomach couldn't be understood, and that we will never understand the transition of food to life.
Yes, those where actual debates.
Now we can simulate a pattern of the brain, and get brain like responses. This shoot a really big hole into Searl's argument..of wait, he moved the goal post regard Consciousness.
Those are both weak pieces of work.
Philosophy as a field of 'study' is no longer needed. hasn't been for over a 100 years.
Intelligence is just a particular make up on a brain. The question is where do we want to set the bar?
"The goal of the philosopher is to lay out what intelligence "is". "
no.
It's a science question. Modern Philosophers answer nothing. The keep asking the same question even though they have been solved, or renders relevant by science.
Modern Philosophy goes no where and is riding on the coat tails of philosophers from a time when they actually did math and science. They have the delusion that anything they think of is valid, and that they can make things up.
You want to watch some people wank around of an answerable question? great, listen to philosophy talk. You want to listen to to people argue over something science has already answered? great listen to philosophy talk.
You want to watch people figure something out? get scientists and engineer.
All the relevant parts of Philosophy has been cut up and given to specific branches of study
Philosophy is the homeopathy of scientific thinking. Diluted to nothing and useless, but still manage to lure the gullible.
Worse then lost, it's change. Surprising fact: the more you recall an event form you life, the more likely it is wrong.
Hell, saying the right sentence can make you think of seeming unconnected thoughts.
IT's only a cult if it doesn't work but you keep doing it. Had the native gotten into their copies of the planes, and they worked it wouldn't have been a cargo cult.
Observing something and then trying to recreate it with rigor and controlled conditions is called science. It's pretty nifty, you should look into it.
Some people actually copy neural mapping of a tiny piece of the brain.
It function as if it is part of the brain.
Why is this a cargo cult? They copied part of the brain and it works. If the made a copy of the brain and it didn't work, then it would be a cargo cult.
Not only do you not seem to now what a cargo cult is, you also seem to be about 2 decades behind in research.
The whole article is about how this is working and being put into place.
" Doubling every 18-24 months means 20-30 years to get human-sized big ol' clusters of neurons."
only if you want one computer to do everything.
Well it does apply in this case. a it turns out the small neural networks copied for the brain, actually act like a human brain.
So it looks like, at this point, we can build a simulation of the brain without understand the 'mind' properties of the brain.
The difference between human intelligence and a human intelligent computer system is computer power, nothing more.
So it sounded like a muffled voice coming from the ground??
what, too soon?
If all you girlfriends and wives go crazy, the common denominator is you.