At this point there is no ration skeptical argument left. It's like saying you are skeptical of the theory of gravity.
Sorry but all the other possible causes have been shut down. All the data point to the increase in CO2.
You gt some new data that point to another cause? great, lets review it. You can write a paper and get a god damn Nobel prize for the new science you would have to had discover.
Don't think being ignorant is being skeptical. it is not. Ration and critical thinking is being a skeptical.
So one side wants to stop poisoning everyone as reasonably as possible, the other side want people to have to breath their poison. When you can keep all you pollution on your property and impact no one else, then, and only then, will you even begin to have a point.
we do understand atmosphere, and yes that does make sense becasue it's trapping the heatr. OCntrary to what the media, tlaking heads, and ignorant politician tell you its a fact.
You don't have to understand every single fact of something for it to be true. That would be akin to saying gravity isn't real.
We know, for a fact, we are increasing CO2. we know, for a fact, that CO2 traps heat. We know, for a fact, the heating is occurring in the lower parts of the atmosphere We know, for a fact, that there is a trend happening on top of normal historic cycles.
And people like to whine. Would you pay 1% more for all your goods? cause that all it would take. My monthly costs are ~ 4000. So I would pay 40 dollar more a month. If it was for cleaning up pollution I have no problem with that becasue cancer, and sickness caused by it have a higher cost.
Of course, we live in an error where when a temporary tax break ends, it gets called a 'massive tax hike' so there is no hope until those idiots are gone.
Why would you be encouraged for someone to bring up there gut feeling in a science discussion? Especially from someone who clearly doesn't know what the artical saying?
1852, exactly. You might want to retake you classes... unless you are posting from pre 1970.
A Nautical mile is arc minute based* a Sea Mile is not**. While both would travel a different number of feet, thay would have travel the exact same arc minutes. So anythnign based on arc minutes would ahve them have traveled the same distance on a Mercator Projection.
I say again: Mercator projects. Please, please, please do not navigate a ship or a plane until you understand that.. unless you are piloting alone, then go ahead and fall to the earth unexpectedly.
So tell me, do pubs just not have the ability to remember anything after the guy is out of office? It's like as soon as the term is up you people purge all negative data.
BY you're logic sand should be the currency. not that I am surprised to see yet another person on/. not know jack about currency:
Fiat money is money that derives its value from government regulation or law. SO it has value, even innate value.
Innate is not the word you want. 'intrinsic value' is what you are looking for; look up intrinsic Value theory.
When talking economic, value USUALLY means An amount, as of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable. SO fiat money has value, by definition.
Find something else to do while talking with friends. I mean, if changing to something else mean you don't meet, then you weren't really meeting for a chat. You where making an excuse to drink.
No, every single one of there tests have been seriously flawed. IN fact, anything involving driving on the show borders on surprisingly stupid.
That's not even getting into the issue that the issue is reflexes and response time, so you should test reflexes and response time, not how much of X is in your system. Of course, that would be reasonable, and remove most people over 60 from driving.
If reflexes impairment at.05 is your aim, the you will need to pull a lot of people off the road who don't drink becasue their natural reflexs are slower then that.
If safer roads are you goal. And I would be fine with a reflexes test being a mandatory part of licensing.
same other thing. Bunch if ignorant posts based on second hand experience, whining about change, and no actual technical arguments about why one is bad or good.
You people are no different the fashioniestas talking about the next spring fashions, or sports fanatics talking about why someone else screwed their team and that's why they didn't win.
Slashdot Mirror
no, you are a denialist; there is a differnce.
At this point there is no ration skeptical argument left. It's like saying you are skeptical of the theory of gravity.
Sorry but all the other possible causes have been shut down.
All the data point to the increase in CO2.
You gt some new data that point to another cause? great, lets review it. You can write a paper and get a god damn Nobel prize for the new science you would have to had discover.
Don't think being ignorant is being skeptical. it is not. Ration and critical thinking is being a skeptical.
.
So one side wants to stop poisoning everyone as reasonably as possible, the other side want people to have to breath their poison.
When you can keep all you pollution on your property and impact no one else, then, and only then, will you even begin to have a point.
we do understand atmosphere, and yes that does make sense becasue it's trapping the heatr. OCntrary to what the media, tlaking heads, and ignorant politician tell you its a fact.
You don't have to understand every single fact of something for it to be true.
That would be akin to saying gravity isn't real.
We know, for a fact, we are increasing CO2.
we know, for a fact, that CO2 traps heat.
We know, for a fact, the heating is occurring in the lower parts of the atmosphere
We know, for a fact, that there is a trend happening on top of normal historic cycles.
you viper sucks, It can't even beat my Yacht in the Americas cup.
It's not our fault you can only justify you massive waste full car if you annoy other people.
You are a wanna be, and a poser.
You can use solar panels in cloudy area, and Germany's project has be very successful.
Their demand drove up production and costs went down. also, so underhanded China BS.
" Fracing is pro-growth and was developed without subsidies"
hahahahha.. why so what flavor was it Grape or Orange.
Without subsidies.. ha.
Gee, you have a gas that less polluting then coal. That's shocking, simply shocking.
And people like to whine.
Would you pay 1% more for all your goods? cause that all it would take.
My monthly costs are ~ 4000. So I would pay 40 dollar more a month. If it was for cleaning up pollution I have no problem with that becasue cancer, and sickness caused by it have a higher cost.
Of course, we live in an error where when a temporary tax break ends, it gets called a 'massive tax hike' so there is no hope until those idiots are gone.
Bha, I came here for an argument.
Why would you be encouraged for someone to bring up there gut feeling in a science discussion? Especially from someone who clearly doesn't know what the artical saying?
that's unbearable.
1852, exactly.
You might want to retake you classes... unless you are posting from pre 1970.
A Nautical mile is arc minute based* a Sea Mile is not**.
While both would travel a different number of feet, thay would have travel the exact same arc minutes. So anythnign based on arc minutes would ahve them have traveled the same distance on a Mercator Projection.
I say again: Mercator projects. Please, please, please do not navigate a ship or a plane until you understand that.. unless you are piloting alone, then go ahead and fall to the earth unexpectedly.
*historical blah blah blah
**Get it?
So tell me, do pubs just not have the ability to remember anything after the guy is out of office? It's like as soon as the term is up you people purge all negative data.
BY you're logic sand should be the currency. /. not know jack about currency:
not that I am surprised to see yet another person on
Fiat money is money that derives its value from government regulation or law. SO it has value, even innate value.
Innate is not the word you want. 'intrinsic value' is what you are looking for; look up intrinsic Value theory.
When talking economic, value USUALLY means An amount, as of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable.
SO fiat money has value, by definition.
Increased drone strike at a time when the tech/cost ration begins to maximize? I'm shocked.
No, he isn't. You are comparing a type of attack that wasn't common under the previous guy to all innocents killed.
Under bush over 100K innocents where killed using non drone technology.
Drone tech is more precise, cheaper and easier to use. Is it perfect? no, but either where pilots flying aircraft in the fields.
The fact that drones are an issue only underlines how desperate the republican media is to pin anything on the current president.
freedom of speech doesn't mean you can say whatever you like, nor does it mean you get an audience.
10 years ago when everyone else did it.
Find something else to do while talking with friends.
I mean, if changing to something else mean you don't meet, then you weren't really meeting for a chat. You where making an excuse to drink.
You would need to be 9ft tall.
No, every single one of there tests have been seriously flawed. IN fact, anything involving driving on the show borders on surprisingly stupid.
That's not even getting into the issue that the issue is reflexes and response time, so you should test reflexes and response time, not how much of X is in your system.
Of course, that would be reasonable, and remove most people over 60 from driving.
they use it over their so it must work fallacy.
If reflexes impairment at .05 is your aim, the you will need to pull a lot of people off the road who don't drink becasue their natural reflexs are slower then that.
If safer roads are you goal. And I would be fine with a reflexes test being a mandatory part of licensing.
same other thing.
Bunch if ignorant posts based on second hand experience, whining about change, and no actual technical arguments about why one is bad or good.
You people are no different the fashioniestas talking about the next spring fashions, or sports fanatics talking about why someone else screwed their team and that's why they didn't win.
Pathetic.
That's Sir Robert of Bloatingham to you, user.
I actually like much about win 8, but I can't resist that joke.
Yes, Mac Book Pros is the 1st 10 links when searching for "MBP computer"
So that's why it's ironic that someone ranting about the eco system would choose an MBP computer.
It's as obvious as anything else.
Yeah, you had ti hit, at least, 11 keys
There is no apparent way to get to the control panel in windows 7. Someone had to teach you or you had to poke around.
This is 'It's not what I'm used to, whaaa' and nothing more.