I can believe it.There are many issue with the App store. For example, you are forced to update your app to meet the new OS/phone. Even though you may have a million peple stiull on old phones, yuo must upgrades even if it breaks/slows down the performance. If you want to have a company where a lot of people us iPads? nightmare.
I personally think they do that so people get upset with their iPhone and ae more likely to upgrade; which fits there advertising strategy.
I have very strong feeling about it. I could, and have, write a 4000 word essay breaking down exactly why we should be metric, showiunf examples of harm from not being metric, as well as the long term impact of how other countries perceive us.
"Why should we ban use of devices because of a minuscule chance that the airplane will experience difficulty?" Because they become a projectile. Either get with the fact you live in a society with other people, or move to an island. I'm tired of you whiny bastards thinking you are the only people in the world
Then stay the fuck off airplanes. Your phone becomes a fucking bullet in an incident. This is not scaremongers, it's simple physics.
"I'm most at risk during the 30min taxi trips homeairport." Not really Billions of more miles are driven then flown, and millions of more people are on the road at any given time then flying. Normalize that and they are the same. Of course it doesn't matter until your taxi rids start accelerating to 186 MPH in a mile.
A) They said 'as multiple actual scientific studies, and, more popularly myth busters have shown.' You just have such a knee jerk biased hatred that it prevented you from comprehending anything in the sentence other then the word Mythbuster
B) You you redesigned it in your head and it worked in your head. That's some fine thinkin' you got going on there...
So many problems that that statement, but I'll just address 2:
1) Fer that to happens means tundra is melted which means huge releases of methane. 2) Why do you think it will stop warming as soon as those areas become arable (assuming that will be arable.)? protip: It won't, see 1
Trees are carbon neutral, and have been since after the Carboniferous era. During the Carboniferous trees did not rot because the critters that cause them to rot had not evolved.
"African guy shows up with disturbing symptoms." No. A guy sowed up with an illness. Ebola symptoms look just like a cold at the beginning.
"What? a few questions might have been nice. " They did ask him questions, he lied.
"Since it's in Texas, the nursing team and Doctors who worked on the guy should be executed in th eGrand Texas tradition." You're a fucking idiot.
"Either that, or forced to room with the Ebola patients." That would be a waste of their time. Oh, you think being in a room will get you Ebola? Like I said You're a fucking idiot.
"But also being Texas, I'll bet he was sent home the moment they found he had no health insurance." False. http://www.usatoday.com/story/...
Doesn't matter. We could increase are usage 10 fold and have enough.
Yes, use it so you can train to kill more people, not to build more reactors.
YOU are the problem.
No, not at all. shovel your shit elsewhere.
Well, using time is a mistake. It's really about 25 billion dollars away.
I can believe it.There are many issue with the App store.
For example, you are forced to update your app to meet the new OS/phone. Even though you may have a million peple stiull on old phones, yuo must upgrades even if it breaks/slows down the performance.
If you want to have a company where a lot of people us iPads? nightmare.
I personally think they do that so people get upset with their iPhone and ae more likely to upgrade; which fits there advertising strategy.
"famous or important in history, or potentially so."
So yes, historic.
Probable American football, since it's the only one with a single regulation field size.
I have very strong feeling about it. I could, and have, write a 4000 word essay breaking down exactly why we should be metric, showiunf examples of harm from not being metric, as well as the long term impact of how other countries perceive us.
"Why should we ban use of devices because of a minuscule chance that the airplane will experience difficulty?"
Because they become a projectile.
Either get with the fact you live in a society with other people, or move to an island. I'm tired of you whiny bastards thinking you are the only people in the world
Then stay the fuck off airplanes.
Your phone becomes a fucking bullet in an incident.
This is not scaremongers, it's simple physics.
"I'm most at risk during the 30min taxi trips homeairport."
Not really
Billions of more miles are driven then flown, and millions of more people are on the road at any given time then flying.
Normalize that and they are the same.
Of course it doesn't matter until your taxi rids start accelerating to 186 MPH in a mile.
A) They said 'as multiple actual scientific studies, and, more popularly myth busters have shown.'
You just have such a knee jerk biased hatred that it prevented you from comprehending anything in the sentence other then the word Mythbuster
B) You you redesigned it in your head and it worked in your head. That's some fine thinkin' you got going on there...
I like it. I would have loved to have something like that back when I hung drywall.
So many problems that that statement, but I'll just address 2:
1) Fer that to happens means tundra is melted which means huge releases of methane.
2) Why do you think it will stop warming as soon as those areas become arable (assuming that will be arable.)? protip: It won't, see 1
Germany kind of shows you are wrong, don't you think?
Or it is happening over time, and evacuation is premature? How about we try to reduce CO2 so it doesn't happen?
Trees are carbon neutral, and have been since after the Carboniferous era. During the Carboniferous trees did not rot because the critters that cause them to rot had not evolved.
You mean where top officials meet and golf aren't published? gee, shocking.
Almost like they don't want people to be attacked while in an open field playing golf.
If they are classified, then how the fuck do you know it's over 100?
until price per barrel drops back to 85.
She did. She broke protocol. How is that not her fault?
I would just tell her not to break protocol.
She teach someone who was sick, and then touched her face. Direct contact with bodily fluid.
The man lied to medical professionals.
"African guy shows up with disturbing symptoms."
No. A guy sowed up with an illness. Ebola symptoms look just like a cold at the beginning.
"What? a few questions might have been nice. "
They did ask him questions, he lied.
"Since it's in Texas, the nursing team and Doctors who worked on the guy should be executed in th eGrand Texas tradition."
You're a fucking idiot.
"Either that, or forced to room with the Ebola patients."
That would be a waste of their time. Oh, you think being in a room will get you Ebola?
Like I said You're a fucking idiot.
"But also being Texas, I'll bet he was sent home the moment they found he had no health insurance."
False.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/...
I suspect a lot of things are beyond you.
That you not only know the answer to, but also state that answer was discovered 40 years ago in the very post you are asking the question?
Doesn't matter, you are still a victim, and the person is still a thief. The victim deserve zero blame, and the thief deserves ALL the blame.
24 is MIlf?
You're sick and should seek help.