Never happen. Having a currency out of bounds means there is no way to know what's going on with the currency. Is someone counterfeiting it? hording it?
And cash isn't really anonymous, never has been. Ask Al Capone.
How do I knw this? bcasue I was on a team that did it. Create a smart card system(first to be used by a financial entity) and you could use it to pay a shop keeper, get paid from a shop keeper, and use it for bank transaction.
So what happened, like in a day, was that people stopped using banks. Why use a bank when you have a card that can get money on and off it?
Sure, the bank had the physical currency in place, but who had what? you can't loan money that's on the consumers card, but you don't know how much is in the costumer vs. shop keeper. What's an asset? How is interest applied? How do we know the amount of currency out there matches what's ib the bank? Who do you do a currency swap?
So we quickly rolled out a patch the mad it so you needed to go to the bank to add currency.
Why would you thing there can only be one reason? It's like saying someone can't be found guilty of murder because some different case has gone unsolved.
FACTS: 1) CO2 , among others, is a green house gas 2) we put billions of tons of CO2 in the air 3) the temperature change is no top of normal cycle 4) every other other possible reason has been shut down. 5) the organisations the it will hurt the most are agreeing with the evidence.
Never, ever, ever quote something from the register. For or against, it's a horrible rag .
No model is perfect. But looking at the whole scope of events and denying them because of events like these is stupid. In fact, it's the very base of cognitive dissonance.
Did you read the study? I assume not because then you would know how stupid it is to quote the article.
Explain to me how this means there isn't man made global warming: ~~ The mechanisms by which heat is delivered to Antarctic ice shelves are a major source of uncertainty when assessing the response of the Antarctic ice sheet to climate change. Direct observations of the ice shelf-ocean interaction are extremely scarce, and present ice shelf-ocean models struggle to predict reason able melt rates. Our two years of data during 2010-2012 from three oceanic moorings below the Fimbul Ice Shelf in the eastern Weddell Sea show cold cavity waters, with average temperatures of less than 0.1 {degree sign}C above the surface freezing point. This suggests rather low basal melt rates, consistent with remote sensing based, steady state mass balance estimates in this sector of the Antarctic coast. Oceanic heat for basal melting is found to be sup-plied by two sources of warm water that enter below the ice: (i) eddy-like bursts of Modified Warm Deep Water accesses the cavity at depth during eight months of the record; and (ii) a seasonal inflow of warm, fresh surface water flushes parts of the ice base with temperatures above freezing, during late summer and fall. This interplay of processes implies that basal melting cannot simply be parameterized by coastal deep ocean temperatures, but is directly linked to both solar forcing at the surface as well as to coastal processes controlling deep ocean heat fluxes. ~~ Cherry picking data is bad, but cherry picking wrong data is.. simply stupid. lower then expected is not 'flat wrong'.
Do you even understand what a model it?
Lets be clear about that letter: 1) Melting not as fast. 2) In no way throws gloabale warming out the window.
" block them from your mind" fuck you and your LOL.
On the plus side,now that the CEO of Exxon has also said that the increase in temperatures over standard cycles i.e. Global Warming, is man made, I'm sure all you deniers will now apologize fro being wrong.
haha, of course you want. You entrenched into an emotional opinion, so actual facts will never change you mind.
That is THE ONLY way they will change. Considering the Democrats are more pre-republican then the current crop of republicans iot's not the much of a leap.
"* Windows/Microsoft updates still require eleventyteen thousand reboots." no they don't. It's rare to need to reboot for a windows update.
* Security is still horribly broken not really. You might want to talk to the people admining if your security is broke.
"* Registry bloat over time is still a problem" yes. The registry is broken, they no it but how to you change it?
"* Winsxs bloat is a huge problem" Application developers have caused it to be a problem because so few of them can do a decent uninstall. The other reason is so older app will still run. It's far better then dll hell; which I talked to upper management at MS about in the 90s, but hey I was a high priced consultant, don't listen to me.
"* Fragmentation is still a huge problem" WTF? are you running XP? is that the problem?
"* UAC is still brain dead but also ineffective" No, It's annoying to people who feel it should apply to them.
"* USB still sucks. Why must a device re-enumerate and be re-installed as a different device if it is moved from port to port? I *HATE* that! Every other OS does it far more intelligently"
No they do they do it differently. Let me know when you can actually think about it and figure out why they do that. That's the part you can discuss.
"* Licensing cost is still outrageous - why should people choose Windows servers over F/OSS solutions?" Because there is more to it the license cost; which is the cheapest part, BTW.
If that is how you use your desk top, then the new paradigm is right up your alley.
I look forward to seeing this from you in a post 3 years from now "Or stay on Windows 8 unless I get a FREE copy of windows 9. I won't pay for it)"
"Yes the dumb 13 year old kid who knows nothing better does not use the start bar," yes, making the computer easier is 'dumb'. Why is it dumb to pin your most used apps? It seems to me going through your menus system to launch an app you do every day is a dumb waste of time.
Jeez, do you listen yo your self or even think about what you are saying?
", I CLICK to them, I don't use shortcuts as that is how 90% of my navigation is done in a UI" WTF? you will still click them,. you juut won't navigate through the menu system to get to them, you cna even organize them any way you old tired and lazy brain wants to.
gah, the worse part about getting old is so many people my age are stupid ol\d farts just shy of grampa simpson in attitude toward anything different.
Tell me again how you used do tie an onion to your belt.
"It is an old IBM model 80" which must look nice next to you're rotary phone.
Anyhow, it's obviously you haven't tried windows 8 and are, contrary to your claim otherwise, just hating it because it's changing.
Pay attention. He has fought for that, but mostly keeps getting blocked by the republicans. He has actually gotten significant troop out of the mid east, and he has continued to fight for a draw down.
You're statement is false with even the most cursory look at the evidence.
Slashdot Mirror
I can say that if it gets popular enough, it will be.
"If anonymity is that important to your transaction, cash is still the way to go."
Al Capone used cash.
Contrary to most peoples opinion, cash isn't really that anonymous in any practical way.
Never happen. Having a currency out of bounds means there is no way to know what's going on with the currency. Is someone counterfeiting it? hording it?
And cash isn't really anonymous, never has been. Ask Al Capone.
How do I knw this? bcasue I was on a team that did it. Create a smart card system(first to be used by a financial entity) and you could use it to pay a shop keeper, get paid from a shop keeper, and use it for bank transaction.
So what happened, like in a day, was that people stopped using banks. Why use a bank when you have a card that can get money on and off it?
Sure, the bank had the physical currency in place, but who had what? you can't loan money that's on the consumers card, but you don't know how much is in the costumer vs. shop keeper. What's an asset? How is interest applied? How do we know the amount of currency out there matches what's ib the bank? Who do you do a currency swap?
So we quickly rolled out a patch the mad it so you needed to go to the bank to add currency.
Then you have lived a sheltered life.
Flash is a pig. Good riddance.
You wan't get better tools for this until flash is dead.
People will continue to be lazy and use it.
Maybe they should ignore browsers the don't support standards?
If people want their product, then they will upgrade.
I bet people who use wax cylinders are pissed that they aren't the standard anymore, so what?
Get a new wife.
Google has held themselves to the ideal very well.
" it's expensive as hell to make something here "
moderately more expensive, not 'expensive as hell'
All of which can be done in the US.
Do you think their aren't manufacturing hubs like the in the US?
Irrelevant to the current event.
Why would you thing there can only be one reason?
It's like saying someone can't be found guilty of murder because some different case has gone unsolved.
FACTS:
1) CO2 , among others, is a green house gas
2) we put billions of tons of CO2 in the air
3) the temperature change is no top of normal cycle
4) every other other possible reason has been shut down.
5) the organisations the it will hurt the most are agreeing with the evidence.
Never, ever, ever quote something from the register. For or against, it's a horrible rag .
No model is perfect. But looking at the whole scope of events and denying them because of events like these is stupid. In fact, it's the very base of cognitive dissonance.
Did you read the study? I assume not because then you would know how stupid it is to quote the article.
Explain to me how this means there isn't man made global warming: .. simply stupid.
~~
The mechanisms by which heat is delivered to Antarctic ice shelves are a major source of uncertainty when assessing the response of the Antarctic ice sheet to climate change. Direct observations of the ice shelf-ocean interaction are extremely scarce, and present ice shelf-ocean models struggle to predict reason able melt rates. Our two years of data during 2010-2012 from three oceanic moorings below the Fimbul Ice Shelf in the eastern Weddell Sea show cold cavity waters, with average temperatures of less than 0.1 {degree sign}C above the surface freezing point. This suggests rather low basal melt rates, consistent with remote sensing based, steady state mass balance estimates in this sector of the Antarctic coast. Oceanic heat for basal melting is found to be sup-plied by two sources of warm water that enter below the ice: (i) eddy-like bursts of Modified Warm Deep Water accesses the cavity at depth during eight months of the record; and (ii) a seasonal inflow of warm, fresh surface water flushes parts of the ice base with temperatures above freezing, during late summer and fall. This interplay of processes implies that basal melting cannot simply be parameterized by coastal deep ocean temperatures, but is directly linked to both solar forcing at the surface as well as to coastal processes controlling deep ocean heat fluxes.
~~
Cherry picking data is bad, but cherry picking wrong data is
lower then expected is not 'flat wrong'.
Do you even understand what a model it?
Lets be clear about that letter:
1) Melting not as fast.
2) In no way throws gloabale warming out the window.
" block them from your mind"
fuck you and your LOL.
Deny
Undervalue impact
Disassociate
Imply fix.
On the plus side,now that the CEO of Exxon has also said that the increase in temperatures over standard cycles i.e. Global Warming, is man made, I'm sure all you deniers will now apologize fro being wrong.
haha, of course you want. You entrenched into an emotional opinion, so actual facts will never change you mind.
Then they should change parties and say why.
That is THE ONLY way they will change. Considering the Democrats are more pre-republican then the current crop of republicans iot's not the much of a leap.
Hey, another ad hom lie from CPU6502
Only proper response:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExWfh6sGyso
Corpora punishment isn't effective any where.
Unless you goal is to create a fearful child who will be afraid to speak.
Texas keep threatening to leave, but fuck, there still part of the states.
Bunch of lying cowards.
You get it all the time because your lack of actual logic and rational thinking makes it look like a troll.
I mean, you're argument almost always have come down to ad hom attacks.
"* Windows/Microsoft updates still require eleventyteen thousand reboots."
no they don't. It's rare to need to reboot for a windows update.
* Security is still horribly broken
not really. You might want to talk to the people admining if your security is broke.
"* Registry bloat over time is still a problem"
yes. The registry is broken, they no it but how to you change it?
"* Winsxs bloat is a huge problem"
Application developers have caused it to be a problem because so few of them can do a decent uninstall.
The other reason is so older app will still run. It's far better then dll hell; which I talked to upper management at MS about in the 90s, but hey I was a high priced consultant, don't listen to me.
"* Fragmentation is still a huge problem"
WTF? are you running XP? is that the problem?
"* UAC is still brain dead but also ineffective"
No, It's annoying to people who feel it should apply to them.
"* USB still sucks. Why must a device re-enumerate and be re-installed as a different device if it is moved from port to port? I *HATE* that! Every other OS does it far more intelligently"
No they do they do it differently. Let me know when you can actually think about it and figure out why they do that. That's the part you can discuss.
"* Licensing cost is still outrageous - why should people choose Windows servers over F/OSS solutions?"
Because there is more to it the license cost; which is the cheapest part, BTW.
If that is how you use your desk top, then the new paradigm is right up your alley.
I look forward to seeing this from you in a post 3 years from now
"Or stay on Windows 8 unless I get a FREE copy of windows 9. I won't pay for it)"
"Yes the dumb 13 year old kid who knows nothing better does not use the start bar,"
yes, making the computer easier is 'dumb'.
Why is it dumb to pin your most used apps?
It seems to me going through your menus system to launch an app you do every day is a dumb waste of time.
Jeez, do you listen yo your self or even think about what you are saying?
", I CLICK to them, I don't use shortcuts as that is how 90% of my navigation is done in a UI"
WTF? you will still click them,. you juut won't navigate through the menu system to get to them, you cna even organize them any way you old tired and lazy brain wants to.
gah, the worse part about getting old is so many people my age are stupid ol\d farts just shy of grampa simpson in attitude toward anything different.
Tell me again how you used do tie an onion to your belt.
"It is an old IBM model 80"
which must look nice next to you're rotary phone.
Anyhow, it's obviously you haven't tried windows 8 and are, contrary to your claim otherwise, just hating it because it's changing.
They will be on the desktop already.
is the start button.
Can't tell if stupid, or ignorant.
Pay attention. He has fought for that, but mostly keeps getting blocked by the republicans.
He has actually gotten significant troop out of the mid east, and he has continued to fight for a draw down.
You're statement is false with even the most cursory look at the evidence.
Depends on the goal of the invadors, as well as many other reason.
What if it was a couple of hundred on a generation ship?
Or it was a few robots?
OR a lost slave ship?
Of course, if the wanted to destroy the earth, then yeah, we wouldn't even see them.
Barack Barada nikto