Slashdot Mirror


Majority of Americans Think Obama Is Better Suited To Handle an Alien Invasion

Geoffrey.landis writes "At last, a public opinion poll that gets the opinions of ordinary Americans on the issues that matter! Apparently, two thirds of Americans polled think that Barack Obama is better suited to defend against an alien invasion than Mitt Romney, according to a survey from National Geographic Channel, done to tout their upcoming TV series 'chasing UFOs'. In follow-up questioning, Americans would rather call on the Hulk (21%) than either Batman (12%) or Spiderman (8%) to save the day. No word on which candidate is most fit to defend America against shambling hordes of undead seeking to destroy civilization in the zombie apocalypse (perhaps that will be brought out in the debates)." The real question of course is how Obama would handle Galactus.

305 comments

  1. Yeah It Was in that Last Debate on ONN by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mediator: First I ask the former Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney, how would you handle an alien invasion?
    Mitt Romney: Simple, I'd shoot them.
    Mediator: And to you, Mr. President, how would you handle an alien invasion?
    Barack Obama: *pauses* Instead of shooting where they are ... *even longer pause* .. I would shoot at where they are going to be.
    Crowd: *breaks out in rapturous applause*
    Mitt Romney: Oh, come on, of course that's what I meant as well. I mean, I'd probably have the military figure all that out or pay someone in rubies or chickens or beads or whatever the hell it is you poor people are spending at Wal-Mart these days.
    Crowd: *boos loudly*
    Crowd Member #1: Oh, that Romney, I don't like him. I don't like him at all.
    Crowd Member #2: I've never seen a Mormon kill anyone -- let alone an alien. Have you?
    Crowd Member #3: I'd bet all my Wal-Mart rubies he doesn't win.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Yeah It Was in that Last Debate on ONN by EdIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank You, sir.

      You stay classy Eldavojohn...

    2. Re:Yeah It Was in that Last Debate on ONN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be past my bedtime. After reading this, it took me a few moments to realize you were joking.

    3. Re:Yeah It Was in that Last Debate on ONN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Yeah It Was in that Last Debate on ONN by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

      He already fucked us over by not giving us a shuttle. But sure, might as well nuke Houston...again.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Yeah It Was in that Last Debate on ONN by emho24 · · Score: 1

      Of course Obama would be better suited to handle an alien invasion. He's an absolute master at division and convincing one race / economic group to hate another. He'd be perfect for demonizing a new "race", he's got lots of practice.

      --
      You must gather your party before venturing forth.
  2. Because secretly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they hope the aliens take him away!

    1. Re:Because secretly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missile defense never worked. Not once. Obama has pushed the funding into weapons programs that may work. Obama doesn't want people driving their cars on the sidewalk, what nonsense is this?

      He's taken out bin Laden and helped Libya manage a revolution in what must be a world record time without losing a single American.

      Teresita: "I'll make a lot of shit up."

      That one I believe.

    2. Re:Because secretly... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Missile defense never worked. Not once. Obama has pushed the funding into weapons programs that may work.

      To the contrary on both: there was just a successful test, and Obama has been funding missile defense, including funding deployment of missile defense.

      Missile defense isn't any longer an issue on which there is significant difference between Republicans and Democrats.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  3. Vasquez's problem? by jaymz666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He thought they mean illegal aliens?

    1. Re:Vasquez's problem? by fsck1nhippies · · Score: 1

      They definitely meant alien invasion from the south(for lifestyle) or north(for healthcare). If anyone from another planet came here, they would pass on by thinking we are a bunch of argumentative assholes

    2. Re:Vasquez's problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      They definitely meant alien invasion from the south(for lifestyle) or north(for healthcare). If anyone from another planet came here, they would pass on by thinking we are a bunch of argumentative assholes

      Yes, but *yummy* argumentative assholes...

    3. Re:Vasquez's problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It disturbs me that you find assholes yummy...

    4. Re:Vasquez's problem? by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      What do you think hotdogs and sausage are made from?

    5. Re:Vasquez's problem? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      According to the packaging: 43% lips, 39% assholes, 17% inorganic matter, 1% "natural flavorings".
      Maybe I should stop buying Bar S hotdogs...

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    6. Re:Vasquez's problem? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He thought they mean illegal aliens?

      Seems the answer should have been "yes".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Oh behave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The real question of course is how Obama would handle Galactus."

    Sign a piece of paper and then watch the military do nothing about it for four years?

  5. NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by C_amiga_fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This used to be one of my favorite channels. Along with "Wild" Discovery, History, Scifi, and Animal. The last one's not too bad, but NatGeo and the others have turned-into reality shows.

    Yeah I know. Complain, complain. Well I can't help if all these channels start looking alike, instead of their original mission. NOW I spend most of my time watching the free broadcast channels: RetroTV, ThisTV, AntennaTV..... they are what AMC and TVland used to be. (Though it's probably only a matter of time til they jump-the-shark and start inserting reality shows.)

    --
    FREE magazine : http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/prior/
    1. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, SyFy <spit /> has two good ongoing scripted series: Warehouse 13 (good campy fun) and Alphas (serious drama -- think X-Men), so it's not as bad as it could be. (Yes, I'm recruiting -- the only thing gonna turn them around is good ratings on the non-reality, non-wrestling shows)

    2. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Educational TV doesn't jump the shark. It jumps Shark Week.

      See also, that scene from the Simpsons where Marge tells Lisa to stop watching The Learning Chanel, and Lisa replies something like, "but Mom, I'm not learning anything".

    3. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Animal Planet recently had a silly mockumentary on Mermaids, intentionally dressed up to look like a documentary (tiny tiny little mention on the website that it was all fiction, and nothing at all in most of the ads). They've also started to add silly reality shows and other nonsense.

    4. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn off the TV. There is more than enough classic literature to last a lifetime. And if that doesn't work, play Skyrim. That should take up at least half of your life.

    5. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Imagine having to actually do something productive.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems that reality tv shows are the cheapest programming you can make.

      "Actors" that are just amazed they are on television and if you tell them they will get paid even half as much again as their current yearly salary they start humping the programming directors leg.

      Meanwhile, the big, classically trained in NYC, celebrity actors bitch about the wrong color M&Ms in their custom trailers and just when does their salary go to 1 million dollars per episode.

      No big loss to me. It's not like I was that into television in the first place. I'll miss the sci-fi shows and documentaries, but that will just make want to watch the documentaries on Netflix even more.

    7. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Kittenman · · Score: 2

      This used to be one of my favorite channels. Along with "Wild" Discovery, History, Scifi, and Animal. The last one's not too bad, but NatGeo and the others have turned-into reality shows.

      Tell me about it - we had "Nostradamus" or some such nonsense on NatGeo (or 'History'). What the heck....

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    8. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Kittenman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It seems that reality tv shows are the cheapest programming you can make.

      "Actors" that are just amazed they are on television and if you tell them they will get paid even half as much again as their current yearly salary they start humping the programming directors leg.

      Meanwhile, the big, classically trained in NYC, celebrity actors bitch about the wrong color M&Ms in their custom trailers and just when does their salary go to 1 million dollars per episode.

      No big loss to me. It's not like I was that into television in the first place. I'll miss the sci-fi shows and documentaries, but that will just make want to watch the documentaries on Netflix even more.

      Refer my sig ... nuff said.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I bet you most reality stars would work for subsistence. Most of them are in it for the instant publicity they can usually parlay into all kinds of insane deals. K Kardashian parlayed a staged sex tape (now the mainstay of D-list wannabe starlets) into a megamillion dollar empire built on nothing but fame. I watched a reality dating show years ago where the participants openly talked about how their stints would open doors for them. How many aspiring actors are on these shows anyway? Even the survivor pariticipants are straight from casting.

      Reality TV (the new kind not the old documentary kind) is dirt cheap and loved by the public. Do a little tweaking of the environment and players and stage things whenever they don't work out and you've got yourself a pot of gold!

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    10. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point was spot on. However...

      It was Van Halen who specified no brown M&Ms. They did that to make sure the technical specifications of the contract had been thoroughly read.

      http://www.snopes.com/music/artists/vanhalen.asp

    11. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by ebuck · · Score: 1

      This used to be one of my favorite channels. Along with "Wild" Discovery, History, Scifi, and Animal. The last one's not too bad, but NatGeo and the others have turned-into reality shows.

      Tell me about it - we had "Nostradamus" or some such nonsense on NatGeo (or 'History'). What the heck....

      The sad thing is that I can imagaine a really good Nostradamus program that focuses on the ebb and flow of his popularity, the way in which he was "rediscovered" by the counter culture movement, and the scientific underpinnings on why so many people tend to associate his overly vague statements with current (or near current) events.

      Instead, they just focus on the "could be hit" predictions, with an allusion that if those are foretold, what about the other predictions.

    12. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by Naosuke · · Score: 1

      Nat Geo used to have a show called Is it Real? that actually did some of this, and it was really interesting. Unfortunately they don't make new episodes of Is it Real anymore, it was great. They would usually have some proponent of whatever they were talking about that week (ghosts, UFOs, etc.) for the first 15 minutes or so, then would have actual scientists come in and explain why it probably wasn't for the next 30 minutes. I miss that show.

    13. Re:NatGeo channel's really gone downhill by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      Too true... I remember when TLC first started, it was pure awesomeness: it had programs like Connections, The Day the Universe Changed, all sorts of history and science documentaries.

      After tuning out for a few years, I was blown over by how the programming on that channel has turned to garbage: http://www.cracked.com/article_18449_the-tlc-experiment-just-how-dumb-learning-channel.html

      I would happily pay double to get TLC, Discovery, Scifi, and other channels back to the quality they used to have, but apparently the majority has decided that every channel must produce reality show crap instead.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
  6. Krugman predicted this. by unitron · · Score: 2

    Well, sorta.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  7. It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course Obama can handle Aliens a lot better than anybody else !

    Obama himself is an Alien - that guy is from Kenya, isn't he?
     

    1. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer Hillary. One look from her and those alien pussies would scat!

    2. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But at least we know Obama's human. The jury's out on Romney.

    3. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Megane · · Score: 2

      That's just his cover story. Biden, on the other hand...

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or nuke her from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

    5. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      No, it's because Republicans would demand to see the aliens' birth certificates and green-cards, triggering an interstellar war.

    6. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Funny

      I disagree. Romney demanding to see their long form birth certificates would have the aliens on the run. Also by taking both sides on every issue Romney shows the flexibility needed when facing am alien invasion. I mean really, can you imagine Obama saying "I for one welcome our alien overlords!" Romney can say it with a Presidential conviction that Obama could never muster. Obama would merely send in the marines to shoot them in the face. Just imagine if the aliens demanded health care! Obama would give it to them if they kept up their grades and did a hitch in the military while Romney would stand definant and insist they didn't qualify for health care unless they resided in Massachusetts. On the bright side the aliens would likely leave in disgust after a few weeks of the squabbling.

    7. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be mutually assured destruction. Don't forget she has a Snuke.

    8. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

      True, or vote for Kodos.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Well I believe I'll vote for a third-party candidate.

    10. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But at least we know Obama's human. The jury's out on Romney."

      I suppose it's possible he could be a cyborg, a robot under a human skin like the Terminator. It's not likely though since the Terminator showed far more humanity than the Rombot ever has.

      Beep! I like firing people. Beep! Corporations are people my friends. Booop! The trees are the right height. Beep boop beep!

    11. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by WhackAttack · · Score: 0

      He's from Hawaii genius.

    12. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead, throw away your vote!

    13. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFY (captcha: Nastier)

      I'd prefer Hillary. One look from her pussy and those alien would scat!

    14. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They just don't realize that Romney would use the encounter to create billions of jobs. By outsourcing them from Earth.

    15. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's from Hawaii genius.

      So he says, but have you ever been to Hawaii? Are you sure Hawaii exists? And even if it does exist, how do we know it's a state? Have you seen the papers that established the state of Hawaii or just reproductions of these so-called papers.

      This is why the only person who is really equipped to handle an alien invasion is America's Sheriff, Joe Arpaio. If the aliens land in Maricopa County, they'll say, "Gawd it's hot here, and the people are assholes! Let's go back to that Nazi base on the dark side of the Moon. Those guys know how to party!" Then, they'd give Arpaio the finger and engage their warp engines.

      [As a side note, I really don't want to go read this article, but can we agree that the National Geographic should be absolutely ashamed of having anything to do with a public opinion poll on which candidate would be best suited to handle an alien invasion? Didn't the National Geographic used to deal with serious topics and occasional pictures of pygmy breasts? What's the deal? I mean, Alexander Graham Bell was one of the first presidents of the National Geographic Society for chrissake. The History Channel, I can understand. They're just a cable TV network, so they've got zero credibility, but the National Geographic? I've got one of their topographical maps of the oceans taped to my wall right here. I actually learned stuff from the National Geographic at one time.

      I guess they figured that the US presidential race still needed a little more triviality and bullshit. Sometimes, I can really understand why so many people believe our culture is in such a steep decline. Are we sure that it's not a typo and was supposed to say "National Enquirer" instead of National Geographic? I guess at least we can be sure it wasn't Rasmussen or Fox News doing the poll, because then the headline would have said "Americans trust Romney more than Obama to protect nation from alien threat by a jillion percent!" Then, they'd show pictures of the two candidates with the photo of Obama darkened and the caption, "Osama - (D)"]

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, he's from the future!... and his birth certificate is fake 'cause he hasn't been born yet!

    17. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think on the bright side, though: 'Robots vs aliens' sounds like some pretty good entertainment.

    18. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      What's the deal?

      Two words: Imaginary Geographic

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I've seen this one, "12 Angry Anthropoids"

    20. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes, I can really understand why so many people believe our culture is in such a steep decline.

      Your assessment of the scorn towards the US is under-rated. You need to rise before you decline.

      What people outside the US believe is that you went straight to decadence from barbarianism, without the usual period of civilization.

    21. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is "Hawaii genius"?

    22. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the papers that established the state of Hawaii or just reproductions of these so-called papers.

      Take a look at their flag, it's a dead giveaway.

      I wouldn't trust Monmouthshire if had a sodding tricolor in the corner, that's for sure.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      What people outside the US believe is that you went straight to decadence from barbarianism, without the usual period of civilization.

      Yeah, and we probably kicked your country's ass on the way there. Ain't it a bitch?

      Don't worry, we'll still sell you blue jeans and movies.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by argStyopa · · Score: 0

      My favorite features about liberals.
      1) they can't really distinguish humor from ideological whinging
      2) if they do find a premise recognizably humorous, they beat it far, far past the point that it's even worth a chuckle
      3) no matter how inane their comments, on slashdot it's +5 insightful

      --
      -Styopa
    25. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead! Throw your vote away!

    26. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Nah. Everything about Romney is made in America. Even his religion.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    27. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      said the guy who couldn't distinguish the humor and is whining.

      Clearly your feeling are hurt, so you declare it past the point it's worth a chuckle.

      Typical, no actual data, no meat to the post, just an ad hom attack.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    28. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we'll still sell you blue jeans and movies.

      Ok for the movies, but the blue jeans are made in India.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    29. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by David+Chappell · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course Romney's human. You might not like him, but that does not change reality.

      You do understand that they are joking, don't you?

      Also, Obama's true citizenship matters a great deal. It's a matter of law. You might not like that either, but unfortunately your personal opinions don't change reality.

      Court challenges to his eligibility have (so far) failed. That is the present reality.

    30. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My kingdom for a mod point

    31. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Nah. Everything about Romney is made in America. Even his religion.

      The worship of money and power is an American invention? Tell that to the aristocracy in feudal Europe, although the fist cave man to take another cave man's shint seashells by force was probably the first..

    32. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      It's obvious you're a rancid republican, you have absolulutely no sense of humor and no ability to see tongue-in-cheek jokes.
      In the same breath, you attempt to bring up something that's been proven false by the president himself.

      If you don't believe it, go back in time and take a picture of him being born in Kenya and show us. Otherwise, you need to prove he was born in Kenya because there's proof to the contrary.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    33. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also know that Romney is in the same party as this guy.

    34. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So yea. Unless you deny that Obama's mom was an American Citizen (she is), and that U.S. Teritorries aren't U.S. soil (they are) he's a natural born U.S. citizen.

    35. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      but the blue jeans are made in India.

      Not the really cool raw denim selvage ones that go for $300.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    36. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by superwiz · · Score: 1

      I was talking about Mormonism, but somehow I think you knew that.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    37. Re:It makes a lot of sense ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I believe I'll vote for a third-party candidate.

      Go ahead, throw your vote away!

  8. TV channel's really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all good. It just means we'll be having another "cord cutters", "Ask Slashdot" real soon.

  9. Obama's solution? by reboot246 · · Score: 0, Troll

    He would bow and kiss ass, just like he has with every world leader since he's been in office.

    No fight - just surrender.

    1. Re:Obama's solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And in regards to the "invasion" part, he'd of course just change the law so that neither police nor military were allowed to intervene against the "illegal aliens"... Problem solved! (or not...)

    2. Re:Obama's solution? by rossdee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we mean REAL aliens (from another planet) then that would probably be the best solution - and alien race that can get here across many light years is bound to be so much more advanced than us that they could wipe all our military out before breakfast.

    3. Re:Obama's solution? by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, like he bowed and kissed ass for Gaddafi. Seemed more like kicking ass than kissing ass. (And just so we don't get into a flamewar over this, this observation is independent of any issues regarding the legality of our intervention into Libya).

    4. Re:Obama's solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, that's exactly, what would happen, you fucking hick.

    5. Re:Obama's solution? by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      While I do think that punching an alien invader in the face is a great way to let them know they are not welcome, I can't help feeling that the rest of your post is, to put it politely, a complete crock of shit.

      Gaddafi, Mubarak, Ben Ali and Assad were all pretty much yesterdays men by the time Obama decided he would jump ship to the other side. just like Saddam was best of buddies until he wasn't. The same will apply to the Saudi royal house when the winds of change reach them, regardless of who is in power. That is just sensible politics.

    6. Re:Obama's solution? by jmorris42 · · Score: 0

      > Gaddafi, Mubarak, Ben Ali and Assad

      Lets look at those four.

      Gaddafi had went from crazy enemy to semi-neutral elder tyrant. Under the bus.

      Mukarak was a military dictator. No argument from me on that fact. Now I await your notion of an alternative that isn't worse. The current situation was entirely forseeable, in fact if you care to search I said so right here on /. The only positive achievement of the Carter administration is about to go into the ashbin of history. (And Hell, with hindsight I'll even give you that it was a big enough deal to even be worth preempting the premier of Battlestar Galactia for... but I was one pissed off dude at the time.)

      Ben Ali has now been replaced with the Muslim Brotherhood. Improvement?

      Assad. Ah, note the difference here. We ain't done shit. Because Syria is an actual enemy.

      And allow me to add Iran as another datapoint. We could probably have made a difference there had we done something bold and outside the media spotlight. Organized friends in the area to help, as in the Saudi's who are already scared witless at the thought of Ajad with a nuke, the new Iraqi government is terrified of being absorbed into a renewed Persia. Again we see the pattern of enemy == pass.

      Pakistan is complex, more a frenemy but far too important to piss off as Obama goes out of his way to do. Afganistan is already preparing to be abandoned to the Taliban.

      Russia under Putin is clearly a threat, we appease them. Remember Georgia? I do.

      About the only things Obama hasn't done (yet) are throw Taiwan to China or give South Korea to the Norks/China and either of those would be pure political suicide.

      Ask yourself, given the practical limitations of the power of the Presidency and his desire to actually be reelected (so he will have more 'flexibility') what would happen if someone (a red diaper baby) who hates the United States and everything it stands for do if somehow elected. How has Obama differed from that? Is there a more reliable model to predict what he will do in a given circumstance?

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    7. Re:Obama's solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone who hates the United States and everything it stands for wouldn't give a damn about legal limitations... Does this make Nixon a red diaper baby? Anyway, why do you weirdos think that oppression will take the form of a law that says: "May oppress the population"? That's not how it works, someone who hates you will disregard the law and force everyone to fall in line, and if you don't think that's possible in the US you don't know about shit about how Men of Steel handle such things.

    8. Re:Obama's solution? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      under the bus for the Muslim Brotherhood exactly like he threw Mubarak under it

      When the only legal place to meet is a place of worship then that's where a large organised revolt comes from. That's why they get Ayatolla's instead of Attaturks.

    9. Re:Obama's solution? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Russia under Putin is clearly a threat, we appease them. Remember Georgia? I do.

      No you don't. You remember the half-truths that were force fed to Americans via a complacent media.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:Obama's solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaddafi continued to persecute his people right up until the time one of them put a bullet in him. The world is a better place without him, and Libya has made a start down a long road.

      Ben Ali has been replaced by Moncef Marzouki, a human rights activist and head of the secular CPR. Nothing to do with the Muslim Brotherhood so I don't know where you got that one from.

      Mubarak was a dictator who not only tortured and killed people, but did so at the request of western powers through rendition, and who only remained in power through massive US military aid. The current president has been democratically elected in reasonably fair and well attended elections. If you believe in democracy, you have to accept that sometimes people will elect people that are harder to work with than those you might keep in power. But I tell you what, having the muslim brotherhood inside the tent pissing out will change them. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow. But it will. and in the long run we will all stand to gain from that.

      Assad? More tricky, since they are cosy with the Russians, and have very effective air defences, as the Turks recently found out.

      Pakistan is complex, as you say. By all rights Bush should have gone in hard on both Pakistan and Saudi after 9/11. But instead chased shadows. Pakistan remains a much bigger threat to the west than any other single country - they were quite happy to host Bin Laden for all those years. But they have nukes.

      Iran? Not sure what "making a difference" there is all about. The west pretty much caused the revolution by backing a dictator.That the result was extreme says more about Iranians than anything else. But they haven't attacked anyone in well over 100 years (unlike most of their neighbours) so I really don't see the beef with them.

      If the US wants to avoid blow-back that can last generations, they have to practice what they preach - democracy and fairness. And accept that each country may take a while to get to where the enlightened countries of the west are now. Hell, the US still has quite a way to travel on that path themselves.

    11. Re:Obama's solution? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      I suppose the will of the people don't really matter when those people aren't Americans ?

      Are you actually advocating that when foreign people want to get rid of dictators America should provide military aid to the dictators and prevent the civilians from gaining the civil liberties they are fighting for if the dictators have been good enough at kissing White-house pucker-holes ?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    12. Re:Obama's solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they were lizards that sent a probe about 600 years ago and concluded we'd still be fighting on horseback covered in knitted wire.

  10. Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by FSWKU · · Score: 4, Funny

    We aready know Obama's response to an alien invasion - legislation to give them all retroactive amnesty and free citizenship. The Space Dream Act. You heard it here first.

    (only partially joking...but I've got karma to burn)

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    1. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got karma to burn

      On Slashdot, saying that pretty much guarantees you'll be modded up to +5, no matter what else you said.

    2. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by nzac · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The GP is well aware of that.

    3. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's try it with an AC post... I've got karma to burn.

    4. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by codepunk · · Score: 1

      Certainly we know he would do all of this, plus allowing our foreign invaders to vote.

      By executive order!

      --


      Got Code?
    5. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 0, Troll

      Our foreign invaders? You mean like . . . Osama bin Laden?

      Oh, no, wait, Obama had bin Laden killed. The Republicans were incapable of that, or didn't want to.

    6. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by codepunk · · Score: 1

      He did not need Osama, someone from the party will cast a absentee vote for him this year.

      --


      Got Code?
    7. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Sulphur · · Score: 0

      I've got karma to burn

      On Slashdot, saying that pretty much guarantees you'll be modded up to +5, no matter what else you said.

      . I'VE GOT KARMA TO BURN

      Don't look now. But if your karma is shaped like a cross, then someone just lit your karma.

    8. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by AmongTheBoulders · · Score: 0

      He would make every effort to prevent individual states, such as Arizona, from making a serious effort to defend themselves on their own. In court and by other means, he would declare war on Arizona to attempt to stop them from trying to defend themselves.

      Presumably, he would also act against any other state, which dared to try to defend themselves on their own, as the federal government does nothing.

    9. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We aready know Obama's response to an alien invasion - legislation to give them all retroactive amnesty and free citizenship. The Space Dream Act. You heard it here first.
      (only partially joking...but I've got karma to burn)

      And since one bad turn deserves another....

      We already know Romney's response to an alien invasion- bow down and worship them, then ask to hitch a ride with them back home to Heaven.

    10. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      Nah. the Forced Alien Rendition Treaty (F.A.R.T.) has a better ring to it. :)

    11. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      We aready know Obama's response to an alien invasion - legislation to give them all retroactive amnesty and free citizenship. The Space Dream Act. You heard it here first. (only partially joking...but I've got karma to burn)

      And since one bad turn deserves another....

      We already know Romney's response to an alien invasion- bow down and worship them, then ask to hitch a ride with them back home to Heaven.

      Obama has public stated he is a Christian and believes this same exact thing. Is there some reason you do not include him in your anti-Christian rant?

    12. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Anti-mormon, not anti-christian.

      And as much as they claim it to be sol Mormonism is not Christianity. Several of there 'belief' are in direct conflict with Jesus's teachings.

      Mormonism was crated by a guy who was willing to kill a child to keep people from speaking against their crazy shit.

      I am not a Christian or Mormon, but I have spent a lot of time studying their histories.; which is why I am not a believer anymore.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! It worked!

    14. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I've been at the karma cap for about a decade now. PLEASE DON'T TAKE MY KARMA!

      (Reverse psychology. 60% of the time, it works every time.)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    15. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's try it again. I've got karma to burn.

    16. Re:Obama's Response To An Alien Invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-mormon, not anti-christian.

      And as much as they claim it to be sol Mormonism is not Christianity. Several of there 'belief' are in direct conflict with Jesus's teachings.

      Mormonism was crated by a guy who was willing to kill a child to keep people from speaking against their crazy shit.

      I am not a Christian or Mormon, but I have spent a lot of time studying their histories.; which is why I am not a believer anymore.

      * * * * *
      Interesting statements about Mormonism. Their beliefs are NOT in conflict with Jesus' teachings.
      It was not created by 'a guy willing to kill a child...."

      If you really had studied Mormonism, you would know those things.

      With all the investigations into Mitt Romney, if your "willing to kill a child" statement had any validity, that would be headline material.

      And yes, Mormons are Christians. The name of the church is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
      Jesus Christ is the head of the LDS church. All doctrine of the LDS church is centered around the Lord Jesus Christ.

  11. Barrack Obama? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually spelled Barack.

  12. sure, just apologize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sorry, aliens. We suck."

    1. Re:sure, just apologize by Teresita · · Score: 1

      Earth. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

  13. Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0

    As long as there are money to spend, Krugman is always on top of it, guaranteed !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as there are money to spend, Krugman is always on top of it, guaranteed !

      Silly Krugman. Everyone knows that hoarding money is the best way to grow an economy.

    2. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Freddybear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Especially if it's other people's money.

    3. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      In fact, from what I see around, that is the main argument against him.

    4. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by khipu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it takes a special kind of naivite to think that with an annual national deficit of $1.3 trillion dollars and a national debt of $15 trillion, we are "hoarding money".

      Krugman is advocating spending money we don't have, money we need to borrow and repay at significant interest rates, or money we need to remove from the economy through taxation. Either is a bad idea.

    5. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by unitron · · Score: 1

      My original post was a joking reference to his not entirely serious remarks about the economic stimulus to be gained from gearing up for an alien invasion (which would be the justification for the government lying and saying a real one was coming).

      But now that we seem to have diverted from humor, what, in percentages, are those significant interest rates at which you think we'd be borrowing?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    6. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2

      Krugman is making a very salient point: The cost of borrowing money is cheaper now than it ever has been or likely will ever be again. If we don't borrow it now, when?

      Borrow money now to fix the economy and infrastructure, and when we're back on our feet then we pay it back. You don't repay debts when you're broke and out of a job; you first get an income and a stable roof over your head, then you worry about paying your debtors. It's a pretty simple concept.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    7. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Keynsian fallacy is in mistaking money for wealth. If a government can release wealth into the economy, things will improve. This is what government funded R&D does, even if that's not the primary goal. In contrast, releasing money into the economy does nothing but devalue the currency already in use. Whether borrowed from China or just printed fresh, the only value of US currency is that it is limited and the promise that it will still be of similar value tomorrow. If you change how limited the currency is, you change the value. If you lose the trust of the populace, you lose all value.

    8. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      ...we need to borrow and repay at insignificant interest rates...

      FTFY. Long term bond interest rates are near record lows. It would be foolish not to borrow. If we borrow now and invest wisely so that the economy grows by at least 2%, we break even.

      Or we can keep cutting. That worked really well for Spain & Ireland.

      --
      -
    9. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      But hay, his had a blog for over a decade, he's been right about pretty much every economic prediction, but lets not actually listen to him.

      Maybe you should understand macro economics before opening your yap? at least then you might be able to form a semi-cogent argument.

      Hint: running a large organization isn't the same as balancing your check book. If you can't not at least grasp that, then you really need to stay out of economic discussions.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are some lovely facts and pieces of history that you've cited to back your point up.

    11. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but with current t-bill interest rates hovering in the 1.9 range, I don't think you can really classify the interest rates as significant.

    12. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree with you. Except..... when we get to the part about "paying it back", everyone seems to leave the room. And then asks for more when the economy craps out again.

    13. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by doom · · Score: 1

      As long as there are money to spend, Krugman is always on top of it, guaranteed !

      Silly Krugman. Everyone knows that hoarding money is the best way to grow an economy.

      And as we all know, those Republicans would never consider spending other people's money on anything.

    14. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by doom · · Score: 1

      I think it takes a special kind of naivite to think that with an annual national deficit of $1.3 trillion dollars and a national debt of $15 trillion, we are "hoarding money". The economy, taken as a whole, is indeed "hoarding money": businesses are sitting on cash rather than put it to work, because they don't see any new orders out there to justify it.

      And Krugman's opposition are indeed people who claim that when there's an economic downturn, the only Serious solution is to engage in fiscal austerity, which is to say, to hoard money even more.

      The point that Krugman and his fellow Keynesians make is that this is a self-defeating formula, because letting the economy sit still in a depression for ten years also cripples government revenues, and is poor way to actually get the government budget under control, and as a side-effect is likely to cripple the careers of a generation of young college graduates.

      On the other hand, since interest rates are down at nothing, if there's anything at all you can conceive of that the government can spend money on that you would approve of, now is a great time to do it -- repair potholes, beef-up public transit, re-hire teachers and cops, etc. And, as a side-effect, you have a shot at cutting the depression short, so it's pretty much win-win. The price you pay is a larger, but manageable, debt load, but then you also get more resources to manage the debt.

      But sorry, I forgot. "Other peoples money! Taxes bad! Liberals bad! Keynes, spit, keynes!" Let's just keep going with the Very Serious people preaching austerity. It's been disastrous everywhere else, but you never know, it might work here.

      And feel free to recite some more big numbers, those are really scary. (Trillions!).

    15. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by khipu · · Score: 1

      But now that we seem to have diverted from humor, what, in percentages, are those significant interest rates at which you think we'd be borrowing?

      About 3%, possibly more.

    16. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by khipu · · Score: 1

      Except that we haven't ever paid back a significant fraction of our national debt in 70 years. So, if we borrow money now, we have to expect to be paying interest on it for a long time. We can really only grow out of it or inflate it away, but the first isn't likely to happen any time soon, and the second has lots of other problems.

      And the only rational reason to borrow money is if your expected return exceeds the cost of borrowing. That's never been shown to happen for government programs. Spending billions on unneeded roads, uncompetitive industries, or ineffcient public transportation is not going to produce positive returns, and a lot of stimulus projects will end up exactly like that because money will get distributed based on political considerations, not utility.

    17. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government borrows money by selling bonds (T-Bills). As you can see, the rates are almost insignificant: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=billrates. Taxes simply don't just disappear from the economy. It's used to pay for salaries and other government benefits that get spent and recirculated in the general economy. Government spending has the same economic impact as consumer spending (even if you don't like what the government spends it on). That stimulative spending would actually pay for itself given the low interest rates and stimulative effects.

    18. Re:Krugman just want to spend more money in it ! by khipu · · Score: 1

      FTFY. Long term bond interest rates are near record lows [treasury.gov]. It would be foolish not to borrow. If we borrow now and invest wisely so that the economy grows by at least 2%, we break even.

      No, we don't break even, because we'll still be saddled with the debt. Future borrowing will be more expensive, and the debt will keep ratcheting up when we hit another recession (as we will).

      Or we can keep cutting. That worked really well for Spain & Ireland.

      Austerity isn't a choice for Spain, Greece, or Ireland, these nations simply cannot borrow at reasonable rates anymore. The only choice these nations have is between bankruptcy or austerity. Ireland chose austerity, and that does seem to be "working well" relative to the alternative.

      The US is in a better position: it can still borrow money at good rates. But if we keep borrowing, sooner or later, we are going to face the same choice as these other nations. That's why we should stop borrowing now and enact modest austerity measures before the financial markets force us to adopt draconian austerity measures.

  14. The Real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the alien invasion Bush's fault too?

    1. Re:The Real question is.... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, he *could* have made the announcement we were going to Mars *before* we invaded Iraq.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:The Real question is.... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Yes, they heard his "with us or against us" speech and decided "against" would be fun.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  15. Let's Not Be Too Hasty by eldavojohn · · Score: 2

    This used to be one of my favorite channels. Along with "Wild" Discovery, History, Scifi, and Animal. The last one's not too bad, but NatGeo and the others have turned-into reality shows. Yeah I know. Complain, complain

    Well, let's not be too hasty now. I mean, what if they did a crossover where some of the animals from NatGeo join the casts of the other channel reality shows? I'd like to see a grizzly bear mix things up a bit on the Jersey Shore. Especially with those night vision cameras they have in the rooms. I mean, the "people" on those shows are already behaving pretty much like bonobo chimps.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Let's Not Be Too Hasty by jd · · Score: 1

      They ARE bonobo chimps. The channels have been doing these wildlife crossovers for years! (After Pink and The Brain retired from starring in cartoons, they went on to scriptwrite for CSPAN. The Family Guy is actually directed by Flipper the dophin. Fox News is not named such by accident.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Let's Not Be Too Hasty by C_amiga_fan · · Score: 1

      "the "people" on those shows are already behaving pretty much like bonobo chimps."

      Is this some kind of Republican crack against our president??? (justkidding)

      --
      FREE magazine : http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/prior/
    3. Re:Let's Not Be Too Hasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They ARE bonobo chimps. The channels have been doing these wildlife crossovers for years! (After Pink and The Brain retired from starring in cartoons, they went on to scriptwrite for CSPAN. The Family Guy is actually directed by Flipper the dophin. Fox News is not named such by accident.)

      Flipper, the rightful King of France? Who knew?

    4. Re:Let's Not Be Too Hasty by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Geneticly and socially we're about halfway between bonobos and chimps. Take that creationists.

    5. Re:Let's Not Be Too Hasty by rjames13 · · Score: 2

      Excuse me good sir but I found this "y" at the bottom of the page. I believe it is yours?

    6. Re:Let's Not Be Too Hasty by jd · · Score: 1

      "Damn you, Pinky! Can't you even look after your own name!"
      "Zoinks! Sorry, Brain!"

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  16. Social Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If these aliens would be willing to pay into Social Security I can't see how we can just tell them to leave without really thinking our options through.

  17. South Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only conclude that too many people watch South Park then... Sorry guys; wizzard aliens do not reside in town hall...

  18. Mitt Zombie by Larryish · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The summary has me confused.

    Isn't Romney already part of the shambling horde of zombies known as "Mormons"?

    1. Re:Mitt Zombie by jd · · Score: 1

      Yes, which is the whole point. Zombies just aren't any good at fighting space aliens - it's just way too easy for the space aliens to get hold of a witch doctor or shaman and seize control.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Mitt Zombie by Abreu · · Score: 1

      *Rebuke Undead*

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:Mitt Zombie by modecx · · Score: 1

      Mitt also supported and or passed laws in Massachusetts which banned (or made harder and more expensive to own) the most useful weapons to be used in the coming zombie apocalypse.

      He'll gladly let you have your single shot .22 and break-action shotgun, however we all know from the various documentary films that a even a zombified kindergartner will easily shrug off a .22, and the trap gun is only useful if you catch a zombie on the rise, otherwise you'll shoot right over the zombie's heads, and besides, they're absolutely way too long for use in tight spaces, and to slow to deal with zombie mobs effectively. Coincidence? I think not!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    4. Re:Mitt Zombie by Larryish · · Score: 1

      If you believe the parent post is Flamebait (-1), you should read some Mormon literature and rethink your premise.

      There are plenty of Mormon meanderings available on Demonoid.

    5. Re:Mitt Zombie by geekoid · · Score: 0

      ") the most useful weapons to be used in the coming zombie apocalypse."
      Science education?
      Rational thinking?

      oh, you're using it as a lazy excuse to bring in a gun rant..how...boring.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Mitt Zombie by modecx · · Score: 1

      Science education? Very useful for creating the zombie apocalypse. Also very tasty BRAAAINS!

      Rational thinking? You're trying to bring this into story about which president would best deal with an alien invasion, and into a thread about Romney, Mormons and the zombie apocalypse, and Mormons being zombies, and Mitt Romney being in collusion with the zombie hive mind, what with the passing of laws which would enable the zombie invasion of Massachusetts. How stupid of you. You probably also debunk your friend's jokes because they violate special relativity, which is what makes them funny, and that makes you an unlikable loner without any friends.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  19. In the words of Nick Fury by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    "You think you're the only politician in the world? Mr. Obama, you've become part of a bigger universe."

    I'd totally watch that movie/reality.

  20. Take me to your leader by bhlowe · · Score: 0

    When the alien says "Take me to your leader"... I predict a mad scramble to hand over Obama. He won't be hard to find-- He'll either on a golf course or at a fundraiser.

    1. Re:Take me to your leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be the same for Bush if he was still president?

    2. Re:Take me to your leader by geekoid · · Score: 1

      He has taken very few vacation days compared to other presidents.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Next question by gmuslera · · Score: 0

    Majority of americans think?

    1. Re:Next question by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      78% believe in angels, 60% or so don't know which coast the Atlantic is on, and 56.8% think it's worth voting for a President, so no.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Majority of americans think?

      I read the headline aloud and my 16-year old son asked the same question.

    3. Re:Next question by Sique · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Atlantic is on the Pacific coast. Right?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:Next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is worth voting for president, the electors don't choose themselves and there are real consequences to abstaining. The truth is, as much as they might be alike in your mind, the two are very different men and will have policies with very different effects.

    5. Re:Next question by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Oh, I think we have bigger things to worry about... 37% of Americans can't find AMERICA on the map.

      I really have to wonder though... Mormons believe each person gets their own planet when they die*, and even God has one (Kolob). Romney would probably say "Grandad, is that you?" before being shot in the face with a blaster.

      * - "Then will they become Gods...they will never cease to increase and to multiply, worlds without end. When they receive their crowns, their dominions, they then will be prepared to frame earths like unto ours and to people them in the same manner as we have been brought forth by our parents, by our Father and God” Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 17:143

    6. Re:Next question by dbIII · · Score: 1

      He's in politics. They only do that Religeon thing when the voters are watching.

    7. Re:Next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atlantic is on a coast?

      I thought it is in Atlanta :P

    8. Re:Next question by mistaryte · · Score: 1

      The Atlantic is on the Pacific coast. Right?

      Eventually.

    9. Re:Next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no, I heard it sunk and it's now under the Left pacific coast.

    10. Re:Next question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, no! It's in the north, 'cause the US is in NORTH America. Duh!

  22. Now's the Left's chance to FearMonger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It would be better to at least try to be ready for an alien invasion. Enough alien invasion fear might be enough to actually get some governments working together.

    Or else get ready for the next Near Earth Asteroid.

    1. Re:Now's the Left's chance to FearMonger! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Genetically engineer them a giant psychic squid and they'll take you up on your offer.

    2. Re:Now's the Left's chance to FearMonger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alien invasion fear

      I think fear of terrorists is plenty enough to cover all bases, including creation of a personal Gestapo unit. Only it will be called Department of Motherland Security.... or something.

    3. Re:Now's the Left's chance to FearMonger! by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      They called it the KKK the last times Democrats needed an enforcement group.

  23. How Obama would handle Galactus. by Vekseid · · Score: 1

    > The real question of course is how Obama would handle Galactus.

    He'd come to the table with "You can only eat half the planet." And manage to walk away with Galactus agreeing to spare 10%.

    1. Re:How Obama would handle Galactus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And manage to walk away with Galactus agreeing to spare 10%.

      That's more than almost anybody else has negotiated. And Galactus doesn't need another Herald, especially not one named Black Dynamite.

    2. Re:How Obama would handle Galactus. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      He'd just tell Galactus that most of the planet is really made of tofu.

    3. Re:How Obama would handle Galactus. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Against Galactus, that's a big win!

  24. Super PAC? by failedlogic · · Score: 0

    "The real question of course is how Obama would handle Galactus."

    Answer, depends on one key factor.

    Is Galactus contributing to an Obama-friendly Super PAC?

    Yes - Obama: "Devouring the Earth is perfectly acceptable, Galactus".
    No - All out war.

  25. Can we please... by jmerlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    get this IDLE crap off the front page. This is the dumbest article I've read on Slashdot all week! Here I was hoping we'd have a week devoid of worthless moronic headlines hitting the front page. This is most certainly not news that matters, to anyone.

    1. Re:Can we please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we've all moved on to better sites you twat.

    2. Re:Can we please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we can get Idle off the front page. You have chosen not to. You saw this article because you wanted to see it. No other reason is possible.

    3. Re:Can we please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ones? I need to get out of here.

    4. Re:Can we please... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      They ruined that this morning with another pointless Raspberry Pi article.

      But I agree. The only thing more retarded than this would be a "Who Would Win In A No-Rules Cage Match - Mark Zuckerberg or Steve Job's Zombie?"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Can we please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It reads like a fluff piece written by someone who saw one too many "Men In Black 3" promotions on a slow day...

    6. Re:Can we please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. That's a fight I would pay good money to watch.
      And I'm no Apple fan, but I'd put whatever money I had left over on Jobs. :)
       
      Captcha: predict

    7. Re:Can we please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get this IDLE crap off the front page. This is the dumbest article I've read on Slashdot all week! Here I was hoping we'd have a week devoid of worthless moronic headlines hitting the front page. This is most certainly not news that matters, to anyone.

      You must be new here.

    8. Re:Can we please... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      article I've read on Slashdot

      Noob alert!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:Can we please... by captain_nifty · · Score: 1

      The correct answer is of course - everyone wins!
      The world would be free from Zuckerberg and Apple would get back a new and improved zombie Jobs

    10. Re:Can we please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. The answer we were looking for was: what is an absurd poll question during an election year to break the monotony of the serially degrading pre-election news cycle? You lose this round, but we do have some lovely parting gifts for you!

      Don't let the browser tab hit you on the way out!

    11. Re:Can we please... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should see someone about the compulsion to read stuff you aren't interested in just because it's on the front page?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. No surprise -- they think aliens are friendly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA

    Moreover, most citizens would not mind a minor alien invasion, because they expect these space-age visitors to be friendly--like the lovable character depicted in Steven Spielberg's popular film "E.T."

    So yeah, Democrats are stereotyped as little Nevilles who'd sooner open a dialog with Hitler than shoot anyone; Republicans as drunken cowboys who'd sooner shoot Ghandi's face off than discuss why beef tastes good, ergo he's a moronic stinking hippy.

    If you think the aliens are friendly, of course you'll want Obama; conversely if most people thought the aliens would be hostile, you bet your ass they'd want Romney.

    1. Re:No surprise -- they think aliens are friendly. by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > you bet your ass they'd want Romney.

      Oh Hell no. If they are hostile I'd want Capain James Kirk or Captain John "Nuke em all" Sheridan. But since they aren't actually available, and neither is Zombie Reagan, the next best option would be Darth Cheney.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  27. barack ack ack by an00bis · · Score: 5, Funny

    ack ack ack ACK! ack ack ack... BARACK ack ack!

    1. Re:barack ack ack by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why can't we all just.....get along?

    2. Re:barack ack ack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely done, that almost made me burst in tears, there should be a special +6 request for comment of the week or something like that.

  28. Obvious by Yoda222 · · Score: 0

    One of them is the leader of a country which as one of the most powerfull Army on earth, the other one is just candidate to an election. Of course the former is better suited to handle an alien invasion.

  29. Well duh. He's black. by aurashift · · Score: 1

    It's like the only qualification a president needs to handle a crisis like that. Incidentally, I was raised by hollywood.

  30. How will Fox spin it? by TimHunter · · Score: 1

    They'll probably get Palin to come on VanSusteran's show to take up for Romney. "Pallin' around with space aliens."

    1. Re:How will Fox spin it? by PPH · · Score: 1

      I think Palin would do pretty well. I saw a bit about her handling a couple of Russians.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:How will Fox spin it? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I think Palin would do pretty well. I saw a bit about her handling a couple of Russians.

      I saw her guy handling a couple of turkeys.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  31. The BEAST Car? End time BEASTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most recent vehicle to be customized as the presidential car is a GMC Topkick-based, Cadillac-badged limousine often referred to as Cadillac One and occasionally as Limo One (a reference to the U.S. presidential aircraft, Air Force One) or as The Beast.
    - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_State_Car_(United_States)

    Hmm.. end of the world.. aliens being beasts/demons... interesting. I mean, out of all the names in the world for a vehicle!?

  32. Experience with Hillary Pays Off by RapidEye · · Score: 1

    Of course Hillary is an alien - all those hours he's spent working with her is finally paying off!!!

    --
    "Murderer? Well, that's a harsh word. I prefer to think of myself as a Mortality Technician."
  33. Yes, but WHICH alien invaders? by jd · · Score: 1

    I mean, the ones from Mars only need a recording of Tom Jones to defeat them, but you need three juvenile delinquents to defeat The Tripods. Everyone knows that.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Yes, but WHICH alien invaders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones who are over 30, have not served in the US Military, and lack a US college degree, of course!

    2. Re:Yes, but WHICH alien invaders? by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      I mean, the ones from Mars only need a recording of Tom Jones to defeat them, but you need three juvenile delinquents to defeat The Tripods. Everyone knows that.

      Except you... Martians are defeated by Slim Whitman.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
  34. Whatever.. by nanospook · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clearing this up!

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  35. Obama is better suited to handle..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Alien invasion? Seriously? I'd say he's better suited to handle a bowl of Mac & Cheese and that's as far as I'd go with his qualifications and skill set. lol

    1. Re:Obama is better suited to handle..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd say he's better suited to handle a bowl of Mac & Cheese

      Whereas you've proven yourself to be barely capable of posting a coherent thought on an internet message board. Truly your assessment of other people's ability must be something special.

    2. Re:Obama is better suited to handle..... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I'd say he's better suited to handle a bowl of Mac & Cheese

      Whereas you've proven yourself to be barely capable of posting a coherent thought on an internet message board. Truly your assessment of other people's ability must be something special.

      Don't be too hard on him. My assessment skills concerning abilities is clearly off as well.

      Prior to reading your post, I would have sworn that someone addicted to smoking bath salts could never become lucid enough to post a legible sentence on Slashdot, yet here you are...

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    3. Re:Obama is better suited to handle..... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I'd say he's better suited to handle a bowl of Mac & Cheese and that's as far as I'd go with his qualifications and skill set. lol

      That depends.

      Not if it's made from Wisconsin cheese. He seems to have problems handling things associated with and/or occurring in Wisconsin lately.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  36. Code Brown by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    lets be real, no president would be able to do anything about it.

    The US is powerful when it's beating the crap out of other humans but against an extraterrestrial intelligence that spans the galaxy?

    That's a code brown situation.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Code Brown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      lets be real, no president would be able to do anything about it.

      The US is powerful when it's beating the crap out of other humans but against an extraterrestrial intelligence that spans the galaxy?

      It's ok; I would probably side with you guys. A lot of us have gone native. And you really are a lot further along than you think. For example, the same technology you use for DLP televisions could be used to create rapidly oscillating microscopic mirrors to generate virtual particles. With a bit of tuning and using lasers for selection/detection, you could use them to pull up wormholes out of the quantum foam (the trick is stabilizing them with negative matter. But wormholes already have negative curvature and thus are negative matter, so you can use the rejected ones to "feed" the one you want to select).

      Oops; I'm rambling. Anyway, the point is that you guys almost have Q-drive, with smaller cores than anything the rest of the galaxy can offer. That and BBQ pretty much means you guys don't have to worry about any kind of extinction attacks. When the aliens arrive, send them to Texas and for Great Maker's sake don't offer them chili with beans in it; you have no idea how offensive that is.

  37. What the shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. What the fuck happened to slashdot, posting this trash?
    2. What the fuck happened to nat geo? Do they own TLC and the history channel now?

  38. Mars Attacks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, he'd be about effective as the "president" in the movie "Mars Attacks"

  39. Obama and Galacticus by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure Obama would grant Galactus work visa and a Social Security number, and defend his right to eat the Earth under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

  40. I'll take Harriet Jones over obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the hulk doesn't even have a sonic screw driver

    1. Re:I'll take Harriet Jones over obama by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      and the hulk doesn't even have a sonic screw driver

      Yeah, but the Hulk has attitude.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  41. Because he's done so well... by malv · · Score: 1

    resolving our illegal alien problem.

  42. Finally! A reason to vote for the guy!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth and Irvine to Geoffrey, poster, please come in. Blow yourself up already!

  43. What timing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, I think it's a really stupid question to ask people. Well, I think it's stupid to make the question partisan, but...

    Man, I just saw my first UFO this Saturday, around 1 PM, Southern Wisconsin. I say it was a UFO because it was flying and I didn't know what the heck it was. It really was like so many videos I have seen. A saucer shaped object, no wings, going through the air at constant speed, "quietly", "accompanied by two jet fighters on either side going about twice as fast as it, approx 2-5 thousand feed off the ground. The UFO may or may not have been flying quietly because the jets were pretty loud themselves.

    I think they're preparing us...

  44. He's probably one of them. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    Of course Americans wouldn't trust Romney to deal with an alien invasion. He's probably one of them.

  45. Obama beats the Zombies by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    No word on which candidate is most fit to defend America against shambling hordes of undead seeking to destroy civilization in the zombie apocalypse (perhaps that will be brought out in the debates).

    Obviously, Obama would be best against the Zombies. Romney would be best against the Vampires. Or maybe it's the other way around.

  46. of course! by sribe · · Score: 1

    After all he is an "alien" resident, having been born in Kenya and all that ;-)

  47. Is Obama Human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the evidence he was born on this planet? Where is the DNA sample?

  48. Duh... what a waste of resources! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Why did they waste precious resources conducting this survey? Most Democrats think Mitt Romney himself to be a humanoid android sent from the Gamma quadrant in sector six by the richest 0.001% of the universe to alter the history. So he is them, he is no good protecting us from them.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Duh... what a waste of resources! by Teresita · · Score: 1

      Most Democrats think Mitt Romney himself to be a humanoid android sent from the Gamma quadrant in sector six by the richest 0.001% of the universe to alter the history

      I think you've been spending too much time on LDS.org. How else would you know Kobol is in the Gamma quadrant?

    2. Re:Duh... what a waste of resources! by tftp · · Score: 1

      Most Democrats think Mitt Romney himself to be a humanoid

      This opinion is not limited to Democrats. Or to Romney.

    3. Re:Duh... what a waste of resources! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      I think you've been spending too much time on LDS.org.

      Or LSD.org.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  49. Future Fake Alien Invasion Repelled By Fake SEALS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So during the olympics or the next superbowl, can we expect a faked alien invasion to be repelled by fake SEALS?

    Couple this with a still image of important people staring seriously at a screen as if it were real?

    Would the alien 'peace treaty' become botched in public so it has to be redone behind closed doors without the public witnessing it?

    We're being blanketed via media with aliens, vampires, and anything occult, it's just a matter of time before a 'false' delusion is staged.

    When it comes to spiritual matters:

    Just remember, kneel before God in the white light, don't let the moment pass, when the red light comes and you don't repent, you lose. The keys to this symbolism is throughout occult popular music and movies today, one example being the Pink Floyd cover, Darkside of The Moon, illustrating a false illumination and change.

  50. thats only because by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    obama is an alien, (from another planet)

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  51. With his record on aliens? He would invite them in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and try to offer them amnesty as they obliterate city after city.

    Scary that its already happening.

  52. Two thirds by Narrowband · · Score: 1

    Of course, the truth is that of the population willing to respond to a survey about Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, the Hulk, Spiderman, and alien invasions, probably two-thirds secretly hope Bruce Banner gets elected by write-in vote.

  53. Obama's real name is... by toygeek · · Score: 0

    Marklar!

  54. Confining Aliens coming to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is silly. They would be interested in the whole Earth, not just one country. What if all children under 10 suddenly disappeared from the whole planet, as well as millions of adults? Humans in general and governments in particular would most likely assume a massive alien abduction. What if despite the most advanced technological searches, not the slightest trace of the whereabouts of all these missing people nor any aliens could be found? Such a worldwide disappearance is predicted to happen someday according to 1 Thessalonians 4:16–18 in the Bible. Efforts to find alien life in the universe, such as SETI, are confined to our time–space dimensions. What if there really are supernatural beings that are beyond and behind our present time–limited existence?

    1. Re:Confining Aliens coming to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're either under the effects of drugs or religion; in either case, you're a babbling idiot.

  55. OF COURSE OBAMA IS BETTER SUITED!!! by kdawson+(3715) · · Score: 0

    Because he is an alien himself...

    Only in Kenya!

    1. Re:OF COURSE OBAMA IS BETTER SUITED!!! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Kenya's a planet?

      stay on topic.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  56. Misleading summary by ildon · · Score: 2

    The summary doesn't make it totally clear that people would prefer the Hulk rescue them from aliens, not just rescue them in general. It's an important distinction because for the general case, you don't want to have to rely on the Hulk to save you from ANYTHING, because he'll likely destroy all of your property and probably accidentally (or purposefully!) kill you in the process.

    Additionally, where's Superman, our home grown invincible alien immigrant, in all this? Has he really fallen so far in public consciousness?

  57. Why would Mitt be AGAINST the aliens? by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't he just shed his human-shaped carapice and welcome his brethren to Earth?

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:Why would Mitt be AGAINST the aliens? by Teresita · · Score: 1

      Klaatu Baracka Nikto.

    2. Re:Why would Mitt be AGAINST the aliens? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Barack Barada nikto

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  58. It's obvious.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama would be better because he is muslim and they have a moon on their flag, right???

  59. Marketing by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    This article is viral marketing ploy for the new Spider-man movie. They are not going to mention the compitition.

    1. Re:Marketing by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Wait they mentioned Batman.... Well I don't know. I still think this is marketing.

  60. Not likely by publiclurker · · Score: 4, Funny

    since they all seem to automatically think everyone different from them is an illegal alien. Instead, they'd probably just tell them that the lawn is out back and don't forget to sweep the patio when they are done.

  61. puppets are no match for alien technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose if there was a way to accelerate Obama to 90% the speed of light he might
    do some damage to a ship, I personally doubt theres a way for anyone to dodge such a
    blast of concentrated energy. Another thing to try is assuming theyre collecting humans
    to take them on their craft would be to boobytrap him with something, depending on their
    stupidity that could be a mininuke or of course if theyre after our meat we could somehow
    infect him with something or sew a container of some agent into his abdomen. Same goes
    for all the other expendables, we have thousands of rounds like that but its doubtful we
    could stop them even if we used up all our local scumbag judges and DA's. Maybe if we
    had that mass accelerator cannon and blasted them with every parasite we got, from IRS
    agents to DHS that might slow them down a bit.

    You're not seriously thinking a TV act is going to stop a determined force with far superior
    technology and lots in the way of that, do you? But think of it this way, what if they do come invade,
    and we end up under their boots.. What if they're a lot humaner about oppressing us than
    our home-grown scumbags? What if they put a stop to the murder and mayhem the motherfuckers
    that run talkinghead pupppets like Obama and Romney cause every day on this world and make it
    everybody on the planet is fed good wholesome food and has a decent place to stay?
    I could live with that. Our scumbags really suck ass, sure it can get worse but theres a possibility
    theyre the Romans. Sure those were evil fucks but they had an empire that assimilates and many
    a germanic tribesman saw the benefits of roman lifestyle and joined them back then, so why couldnt
    that be the case as well with those aliens that are on their way, lol.

  62. Unfair Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're confusing Obama with Will Smith.

    Yes, I just went there.

  63. What alien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From outer space or from other countries?

  64. them pesky country-people by abuelos84 · · Score: 1

    Who's Libya?
    There are "Libyans".. A lot of them..
    So who did he helped?

    --
    -- Counting backwards since 1984!
  65. So is this *instead* of him being president? by tlambert · · Score: 0

    What was the exact question?

    Was it "Is Obama better suited to handle an alien invasion, or serve another term as president?"

    Because I'd say Romney is better suited for the alien invasion thing too.

  66. Spelled "Barack" wrong. by WhackAttack · · Score: 1

    Title says it all.

  67. Don't Mormons Have More Experience by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    With that Xenu guy and all? What's that? Wrong cult? Poppycock! I bet Mitt Romney would kick Xenu's ass all the way back to the.. um... I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess "Galactic Federation of Planets"?

    Yes. It's my premise that I can't tell the difference between Mormons and Scientologists. Thank you for ruining the joke!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  68. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He sure has the bowing part down pat.

    All hail our new ant overlords.

  69. of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll secretly promise the we will surrendering after the election

  70. Re:WTF!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you failed to vote the story down. Damn you you failure!

  71. But Romney talks to aliens from Kolob by mykos · · Score: 1

    Surely Romney would be better suited for alien contact, since he already prays to God and Jesus, who are in fact aliens from Kolob as this informative video demonstrates.

  72. He will just issue them all work permits. by melted · · Score: 1

    He will just issue them all work permits, as long as they entered the country when they were in their late teens.

    1. Re:He will just issue them all work permits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they vote for him, Obama won't give a crap about what they do. If they break any laws, he'll just choose not to enforce them, and punish any state that does.

  73. Barack or Brak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they for the confused by the question.
     
    Brak/Zorak 2012!

  74. majority of americans wrong by Surt · · Score: 1

    I'm pro Obama, but I'm sorry, both candidates are equally unqualified as it's a complete lost cause. We cannot beat a civilization capable of invading us.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:majority of americans wrong by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Depends on the goal of the invadors, as well as many other reason.

      What if it was a couple of hundred on a generation ship?
      Or it was a few robots?
      OR a lost slave ship?

      Of course, if the wanted to destroy the earth, then yeah, we wouldn't even see them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:majority of americans wrong by Surt · · Score: 1

      I probably wouldn't have categorized those as an 'invasion' (more of a visit). I was definitely assuming the hostile definition of invasion, and I admit I could have been wrong in assuming that about the article as well.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  75. Note by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Mormons don't believe in Aliens (the ET kind)

    I did ask a couple of their missionaries once.

    Of course fundie Christians who believe in a 4004bc or so date for creation wouldn't believe in aliens either.

    1. Re:Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And atheists still believe that there is a reason to help poor and sick people, despite the fact that evolution and nature don't. We all exist due to an extremely random chance that we can't recreate, nor decide on how exactly it happened, but somehow they ascribe value to people.

    2. Re:Note by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      And atheists still believe that there is a reason to help poor and sick people, despite the fact that evolution and nature don't.

      Uh, actually they do.

      We all exist due to an extremely random chance that we can't recreate, nor decide on how exactly it happened, but somehow they ascribe value to people.

      ISTM that most atheists ascribe *more* value to people than religious conservatives do.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  76. Obama v Galactus by guttentag · · Score: 1

    The real question of course is how Obama would handle Galactus.

    He would decree that this evil can only be defeated with mandatory universal health care. It only works if everyone is part of it. Then as the vortex of doom settles over each major city and the Supreme Court strikes his mandate down he'll say, "fine! It only works if most of us are part of it." Then as people are being sucked up into the sky, he'll scream, "I inherited this, you know!"

  77. Obama for Alien zapper in chief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has it already been mentioned that the white house will now announce that and invasion is taking place immediately before election day?

  78. Both would come a poor second to Chuck Norris by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

    The Subject says all I have to say.

  79. This is dead serious by slashrio · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this is the mainstream media preparing the American public, as ordered by their owners (the banks, weapons industry etc.), for a new spending spree of tax money. This time it isn't terrorism (who still believes in that story?) but 'alien invasion'. Be prepared, develop more space weapons, give more money to the industrial mologs and pay more taxes.
    That's what's going on!

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  80. Really ? by SvenLee · · Score: 0

    Obama is better?? How to do with an Alien Invasion?

  81. The Planet Kolob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised. Romney believes God lives on the planet Kolob.

    I'm not kidding.

  82. As our first Vulcan President by VernorVinge · · Score: 1

    I expect Obama to do no less than help us live long and prosper. Though his pacifism probably means we'll all get it in the ass from our alien overlords. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/10/opinion/10dowd.html

    --
    Stay skeptical, my friends.
    1. Re:As our first Vulcan President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Bin Ladin about his "pacifism". Or all the people killed with drones. Or the Iranians suffering his cyber attacks.

    2. Re:As our first Vulcan President by khipu · · Score: 2

      Obama went into the last election creating the image of being a pacifist and a defender of civil rights. In practice, he has turned out to be neither.

    3. Re:As our first Vulcan President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manatee fucker won the Nobel Peace Prize and you don't get one of those by being a warmonger.

    4. Re:As our first Vulcan President by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Pay attention. He has fought for that, but mostly keeps getting blocked by the republicans.
      He has actually gotten significant troop out of the mid east, and he has continued to fight for a draw down.

      You're statement is false with even the most cursory look at the evidence.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:As our first Vulcan President by khipu · · Score: 1

      Obama is the commander in chief. Whether to maintain troops overseas, whether to keep Guantanamo open, whether to spy on American citizens, and whether to send drones off to kill people overseas, those are all ultimately Obama's decisions.

      Even if this were up to Congress, Obama promised to make it happen, and that includes dealing with Congress in whatever way necessary. But, again, it's not up to Congress anyway.

  83. Hmm. by meowris · · Score: 1

    Reading this, I almost thought I am at The Onion.

  84. Yay! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    ...okay...

    (QD backs away slowly from the rest of humanity)

  85. X-Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best defense from an invasion of mythological creatures? Pick your favorite from this list of fictional characters.

  86. Alien invasion? LOLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One LIE after another!!! We're having an illegal Alien invasion right NOW and he is helping them!!! What bullshit!

  87. Romney is clearly better. by FauxReal · · Score: 2

    Romney would have a much better chance of saving us from the aliens. He'd simply recruit an army of Mormon missionaries to invade the aliens' landing craft and annoy them until they escape back to their home planet.

  88. Really? by meerling · · Score: 1

    When the h#@* did an imaginary alien invasion become a talking point in the debates?!?!

    We're far more likely to be invaded by African Pygmies than Extraterrestrials.

    For that matter, despite what Hollywood shows in it's movies, we'd be toast. It would be like a 2 cavemen in a dugout canoe trying to fight the WW2 Allied D-Day Invasion force backed up with 3 nuclear aircraft carriers.

  89. Mukor rules *all* galaxies. by dan_bethe · · Score: 1
    Mukor rules *all* galaxies.

    pic

    link

    No Earth Slime has destroyed Mukor...

  90. By the Lords of Kobol, this is a silly question! by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

    Obama is Protestant of some flavor. Romney is a Mormon. Which religion inspired a movie and TV series about a "rag-tag fugitive fleet" of humans fighting killer robots in outer space? I rest my case.

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  91. Galactus in 2016! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's got my vote!

  92. A very big mistake there by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Because Syria is an actual enemy.

    Until recently it was most definitely an ally taking part in combined actions - remember the "extreme reditions" to Syria and the Syrian miltary action 3 or 4 years back to protect the US embassy? There may not be as much involvement as there is with the US troops in Algeria (now that place is an even worse basket case), but the US intelligence community if not the military has been working directly with their counterparts in Syria as allies in the very recent past.
    It's a very unpleasant association to remember which definitely erodes the moral standing of the US government, but we shouldn't pretend it never happened, especially since IMHO that influences the current US action of not intervening. There's also the problem of pissing off the Israel lobby by taking one side or another in a nation that extremists in that lobby would like to see turned entirely into radioactive glass. Helping anybody at all in Syria becomes a bad political move for people who care about their jobs more than fixing problems. Washington careers will end no matter what action is taken on Syria so advisors call for no action, whether that's the best option r not.
    Most of Pakistan isn't even a nation by any definition (even that of the American Indian nations before the US existed, although if you consider them all together that's close) and was really just an access agreement with the British in the 19th century with the agreement to not bother all the warlords that just ran things at a local level - and that's pretty well how it still stands. We can't really call Pakistan a "frenemy" or consider it as a single entity because while we can deal with their government they really have little or no control over most of the area we call Pakistan. Maybe we should point those tribal areas out to libertarians to show them what their dream looks like.

  93. * BA DUM... * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes one to know one!

    * ...TSSCH! *

  94. Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This whole thing simply reinforces the view the rest of the world has that Americans are war mongering morons.

    Can you get any more brain dead ?

  95. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it because he is one himself?

  96. The USA isn't Hoarding Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rich bastards are.

    Why?

    Because after a certain amount of it, there's no value to money as far as spending it goes.

    It becomes a measure of power and leverage. If you have more money than someone else, you can enforce YOUR ideals on them better than they can return the "favour". Therefore it's no longer how much you have, but how much you have COMPARED TO EVERYONE ELSE.

    So if you are silly and go out and *spend* money, you're LOSING POWER. You're going to be told what to do.

    1. Re:The USA isn't Hoarding Money. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Because after a certain amount of it, there's no value to money as far as spending it goes.

      It becomes a measure of power and leverage.

      So "power and leverage" has no value?

  97. Majority of Americans? BS alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The poll is Propaganda which maintains the Left Right Paradigm, which allows globalist psychopaths to continue hold power

    Fuck National Geographic, Fuck Obama, fuck Polls

  98. BUT obama is the alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is obama going to fight himself ?

  99. Who could defend us? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    At last, a public opinion poll that gets the opinions of ordinary Americans on the issues that matter!

    But who could possibly defend us from such morons?
    That's an immediate concern far greater than for alien/zombie/vampire/deity invasions.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  100. ...than what? by TonyJohn · · Score: 1

    I mis-parsed the heading and asked myself "better at an alien invasion than what?" The economy, an aging population, terrorism?

    --
    Owl tried to think of something wise to say, but couldn't.
  101. I wept for the future of science by CayceeDee · · Score: 1

    When I read that the National Geographic had lost all respectability by asking people this question and whether "The Hulk" or "Batman" would be the best solution. A sad day indeed.

  102. obligatory by superwiz · · Score: 1

    ...takes an alien to fight an alien?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  103. Hoarding money = saving = investments by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    When you hoard money you generally save it instead of building a Scrooge McDuck-type swimming pool. Those investments are used for loans, etc. A low savings rate is one of the main things to get us into this mess.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Hoarding money = saving = investments by geekoid · · Score: 0

      "A low savings rate is one of the main things to get us into this mess."

      shut up. I mean, seriously, shut the fuck up, you clueless moron.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  104. Obama is an asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That asshole cant do anything right ... progressive liberals think he is better suited than someone else to do anything?

  105. Mormon's Have Their Own Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Romney would be best for aliens. He will someday have his own planet / universe.

    http://www.mormondna.org/mormon-beliefs/mormons-planet-die.html

  106. It's simple really by DeTech · · Score: 1

    Obama == Deep impact.

    Romney == Mars attacks

  107. Well, That Settles It. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that settles it. I know who I am voting for.

    Emperor Lrrr 2012

    News for nit wits. Stuff that splatters!

  108. ALIEN INVASION HOAX. PEOPLE ARE FALLING FOR IT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, congrats to the NWO bastards! (note the SARCASM) Decades of predictive programming with tons and tons of alien and scifi fiction and supposedly "scientific" research on the matter has proven to work. People are so brainwhashed that they even consider it a possibility (I'm ashamed even I fell for that for a time). And not only that but they also put their trust in government to lead them in that supposed time of crisis. It makes me furious.

    Alien invasion is one of the several possible set-up scenarios to declare an emergency and martial law and it's been subtily (and not so subtily) pointed at in public speech by world leaders from time to time for decades.
    This poll is just probing the state of the brainwashing and it's publishing works as feedback to reinforce the effect.
    STOP LISTENING TO THE MEDIA.

  109. Obama 1 : Aliens 0 : Romney: -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama would have a plan and then act on it. Romney would complain about the aliens and Obama's plans, but would not offer anything as a concrete alternative except to say something like, "I believe *every* American has a right to freedom from alien invasions."

  110. Alien invasion ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a pleiadian extraterrestrial living in this beautiful planet. Here is very hard to us have friends because people on this planet is very manipulated, they are not free as us and their bahaviors by that reason are different. Many of us are living here nowadays and all the time extraterrestrials have always visited this planet as people travel between countries. As proof of this research about Nefertiti, a Sirian extraterrestrial that was Queen on Egypt, or about Christ a messenger from pleyades. The pleiadian Jmmanuel is very popular in this world as the only son of God, everyone is son of GOD :) We are humans as you, only we have lived many lifes. Most of the terrestrials are young souls so it is very easy to deceive them with lies as an alien invasion. We are older beigns with more wisdom. We are extremely friendly with all beigns including planets and universes. And we are here with the only purpose to teach and share great moments with anyone !!

  111. That's a clown question, bro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now back to our inane programming that passes as "news".

  112. Neither would be any good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One would oursource all of our jobs to their planet and the other would let them colonize our country and give them all our resources.

  113. Obama is an alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This proves it: http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSal5oFlCZ9tafp2a4OZfZau2SOZ3uYdhdp3oDeQouHk9uAzUum4A