SIgh.. may to leap to stupid conclusions. Seriously, the extreme logical fallacy? stop being stupid.
I am simply talking about easy access in common areas. Places where people have to go to live.
"we should always cater to the lowest common denominator and ban said activities?" I am not talking about a ban. Put it in casinos. Fine. But when someone has a problem where their brain chemistry compulses them to do something, where there really is no choice, out of grocery stores and the home is a reasonable compromise.
"See my point?" yeah, and ti has nothing to really do with what I am saying.
Spend some time studying neurology and we can get more into the nity gritty. Until them, shut up.
As for booze? yeah, it should be sold in liquor stores, not in grocery stores.
Restricting access from common public areas isn't telling someone how to live there life.
It has been shown that people with certain brain chemistry can not help themselves. IT's not a choice they are making. That's my point.
Having an incredible easy way to access these machines hurts everybody except the people who own them. "should be the freedom to screw up your life on your own terms" did you even read the whole post? understand it?
"Most meetings should involve two people. Sometimes three. Rarely more." I disagree. Meeting need the person calling it to be a moderator, anyone would be able to call it when it starts to loose track, and develop a culture that respect those 2 rules. Some thing s are really to complex or require too many disciplines for meeting that small.
"Any meeting that involves more than three people should be done standing up." Don't be an ass.
"Anyone should feel free to excuse themselves from a meeting when they feel their presence is no longer useful." Absolutely.
"Meetings should have a written agenda and a clear purpose" Absolutely.
"Meetings should have a clearly stated start time and a clearly stated end time. Never wait for late people." depends. Sometime people will have meeting back to back. The culture I am currently in is 5 minutes.
"Meetings should have a designated note taker, and any decisions should be documented and disseminated." Absolutely
"Most regularly scheduled "status" meetings are a waste of time" I disagree. Have you ever worked on a multi-million project that involves a dozen or so different groups and disciplines?
Sometime that are needed. Does this mean every week and everybody? not usually. And they should be quick. determine if the status are as expected. If there are problems that can't be solve sore explained in 30 seconds, set up a meeting with the people who know what you need.
" I'm contemplating litigation. " do it and be loud. Hell, if you can run into him while he is wining and dining a potential customer, or bank loan, so much the better.
Drinking can be fine, but people who are: " useless sponges that just sat around drunk/high all the time" will be useless sponges anyways. That's a management problem.
Who do you think will be able to industrialize for commercial medical use the best? Pharmacy companies. Who already had volume of research on growing, using, and effects from marijuana? Pharmacy companies. The fact of the matter is that is't medical effects are minimal, so it's not like it will cure anything. It's best at quelling side effects.
And then there is the other big player: Who would make the most money? Tobacco companies. Since it would take them about 2 weeks to start producing pot ' cigarettes'.
Marijuana is illegal for the simple reason that some right wing religious nuts think it's 'bad'.
People like to think there is some sort of choice involved, but for a great many people it's an illusion of choice. If you have high dopemine levels, you're brain is more likely to come up with reasons, or a compulsion to gamble.
Which is important when you travel with it. Or digital is the only way you are getting music. Also, how well do the other device integrate with android phones?
For several reasons: 1) once radar is 'jammed' they know something is up and launch planes that have their own radar 2) They will quickly determine where the jamming is coming from, so you need aircraft entering before or at a different area. 3) Decoy 4) To evacuate the target area through another countries air space without alerting that country's general populace.
You also need to know how much money is where for many economic reasons.
Lets say you have a million but bucks, or what ever. How much of that is available for lending? what is consumer spending doing? Interest? Currency swaps?
Slashdot Mirror
SIgh.. may to leap to stupid conclusions. Seriously, the extreme logical fallacy? stop being stupid.
I am simply talking about easy access in common areas. Places where people have to go to live.
"we should always cater to the lowest common denominator and ban said activities?"
I am not talking about a ban. Put it in casinos. Fine. But when someone has a problem where their brain chemistry compulses them to do something, where there really is no choice, out of grocery stores and the home is a reasonable compromise.
"See my point?"
yeah, and ti has nothing to really do with what I am saying.
Spend some time studying neurology and we can get more into the nity gritty. Until them, shut up.
As for booze? yeah, it should be sold in liquor stores, not in grocery stores.
Restricting access from common public areas isn't telling someone how to live there life.
It has been shown that people with certain brain chemistry can not help themselves. IT's not a choice they are making.
That's my point.
Having an incredible easy way to access these machines hurts everybody except the people who own them.
"should be the freedom to screw up your life on your own terms"
did you even read the whole post? understand it?
Some people DON"T HAVE THAT FREEDOM. Not at all.
Wrong.
If you where correct, the corporate decisions would go when the CEO left.
Brilliant and quick.
Really, you should do less looking at others and calling them stupid, and more looking into the mirror.
"Steve Jobs and his team made a damn fine piece of technology"
Copied. they Copied it from the LG Prada.
Vapid an Useless? I agree.
"Most meetings should involve two people. Sometimes three. Rarely more."
I disagree. Meeting need the person calling it to be a moderator, anyone would be able to call it when it starts to loose track, and develop a culture that respect those 2 rules. Some thing s are really to complex or require too many disciplines for meeting that small.
"Any meeting that involves more than three people should be done standing up."
Don't be an ass.
"Anyone should feel free to excuse themselves from a meeting when they feel their presence is no longer useful."
Absolutely.
"Meetings should have a written agenda and a clear purpose"
Absolutely.
"Meetings should have a clearly stated start time and a clearly stated end time. Never wait for late people."
depends. Sometime people will have meeting back to back. The culture I am currently in is 5 minutes.
"Meetings should have a designated note taker, and any decisions should be documented and disseminated."
Absolutely
"Most regularly scheduled "status" meetings are a waste of time"
I disagree. Have you ever worked on a multi-million project that involves a dozen or so different groups and disciplines?
Sometime that are needed. Does this mean every week and everybody? not usually.
And they should be quick. determine if the status are as expected. If there are problems that can't be solve sore explained in 30 seconds, set up a meeting with the people who know what you need.
Never, ever, bring sugar heavy food.
" I'm contemplating litigation. "
do it and be loud. Hell, if you can run into him while he is wining and dining a potential customer, or bank loan, so much the better.
Drinking can be fine, but people who are:
" useless sponges that just sat around drunk/high all the time"
will be useless sponges anyways. That's a management problem.
"sounds like your iterative spiral waterfall is more what actual agile should be than what you had implemented,"
maybe you should read up on it , cause that's not agile or even close?
Ah ./, where the best way to be produce is to bring in lots of ways to goof off.
Poker? with no money?
No good will come out of that. Either people wont be serious, or it will turn to money.
try board games; especially board games where people work together.
Pandemic comes to mind.
motivated people.
Or they have, and this is a token measure so they can get money from another states and assume it was in state money.
False. Please stop with the ignorance.
Who do you think will be able to industrialize for commercial medical use the best? Pharmacy companies.
Who already had volume of research on growing, using, and effects from marijuana? Pharmacy companies.
The fact of the matter is that is't medical effects are minimal, so it's not like it will cure anything. It's best at quelling side effects.
And then there is the other big player:
Who would make the most money? Tobacco companies. Since it would take them about 2 weeks to start producing pot ' cigarettes'.
Marijuana is illegal for the simple reason that some right wing religious nuts think it's 'bad'.
neurology, the less I like legalized gambling.
People like to think there is some sort of choice involved, but for a great many people it's an illusion of choice.
If you have high dopemine levels, you're brain is more likely to come up with reasons, or a compulsion to gamble.
This is why I am now against online gambling in the home, and gambling in places people must go to needs. Grocery stores etc.
Here is an example:
http://www.radiolab.org/2009/jun/15/seeking-patterns/
Some of the details aren't 100% accurate, but close enough for the average person.
You look at someone that is gambling there life away an think it's just a bad decision they can control may not be correct.
You aren't paying for the wire, you are paying for the design, and the fact that it matches, and quality*.
*presumable, I have actually seen them, so I have no idea how well they have been manufactured.
And the speakers are fine for that size.
Which is important when you travel with it. Or digital is the only way you are getting music.
Also, how well do the other device integrate with android phones?
Jobs isn't leaving American soil anytime soon.
once again, the sandwich heavy portfolio pays off for the hungy investor. - Z
Careful he might make you stand and deliver... what?
That's a nice story that flies in the face of experimental evidence.
Sorry, doesn't happen.
Why don't you tell us the one about using radar to cook a turkey?
For several reasons:
1) once radar is 'jammed' they know something is up and launch planes that have their own radar
2) They will quickly determine where the jamming is coming from, so you need aircraft entering before or at a different area.
3) Decoy
4) To evacuate the target area through another countries air space without alerting that country's general populace.
" you can jam or shut down "
that's not how stealth works.
You might want to read up.
There are two very important questions that should have been answered:
1) How much power are the getting from the Beer Stein in the picture.
2) What beer is in the stein.
You also need to know how much money is where for many economic reasons.
Lets say you have a million but bucks, or what ever. How much of that is available for lending? what is consumer spending doing? Interest? Currency swaps?
No, it's a massive flaw.
There is more to money then you buying a soda.