Here is the thing. Every time series discussion starts to happen, certain politician derail, misdirect, or blatantly stop the discussion. It doesn't fit their constituent theology and/or ideology.
Since disease means the world will become too polluted and warm for human civilization, most main stream 'cures' won't be worse.
What correct means in this case is 'control for known variables.'
As an example. Suppose you have a thermometer above a surface that will make the thermometer read 2 degrees warmer. You control the variable(correct). and subtract 2 degree for the appropriate times.
That is just a simple example i an ideal world with no other factors. Don't take it to e anything more than that.
You are not a skeptic. Skeptics use critical thinking skills. You are a denier who thinks they are skeptical.
"The ground station temperature data has been quite thoroughly manipulated, always "adjusted" in the direction of confirming the theories of the researcher making the adjustment, Pardon my skepticism about that data." False.
" But now there's this new satellite data that must be "processed" to be understood." Like ALL satellite data.
You really don't know what you are talking about. Why don't you turn your so called skepticism on those very claims?
Once again you don't talk about AGW science facts, only you misunderstanding of a high quality science report.
BTW AGW and Climate change are different things. If you can not understand even that basic fact, then you have no hope of understanding the basic facts of AGW.
Not likely since AGW is based on science, and scientific method. Where as deniers are just a bunch of dolts with no science behind them. Ask yourself this: How come AGW deniers never talk about the actual science? They make post like you do: No evidence, no data, every scientist, every agency, every competing country are all in some conspiracy and only the enlightened few* can see 'The Truth!'
- He was suspended due to a "bizarre" four page letter that he wrote to county officials, that raised mental health concerns. - He has not been arrested, and is not being charged with any offence - It does not appear that his mental health evaluation was mandatory or coerced in anyway other than as a condition of returning to work.
Is it that journalism doesn't exist, or that you just don't know how to use google?
They same thing for everyone who just immediately gets outraged, then when presented with actual facts, they deride said facts. Often even getting angrier.
The first thing you do if you value actual critical thinking is point that at your sacred cows and do some slaughtering.
What should he do about issues in another country, about a different country, that impacts Europe?
Europe had the chance to stop him, but the were to afraid their economy might not grow as fast as they like if they did.
China? WTF about China? ISIS? he has the same problem every world leader has. ISIS isn't a country. It's a group of people. Maybe the next time an unarmed person gets killed by a cop, Europe should send it troupes? OR after the bombing in Boston, how would you have felt if China sent in troupes to fix the problem?
Grow the fuck up and learn to deal with complex problems like a thinking adult.
Nothing that you list is anyway the US's fault, much less Obama's fault.
A) That's not what happened B) There are better places for it C) How is not putting a widely circulated piece on Slashdot burying ones head in the sand?
" Departments of Defence[sic] routinely engage in offence at the drop of a hat. We routinely see far more aggressive language coming out of the White House." blatantly false, but the exact kind of stupid that comes from/. regarding politics or economics. So not only is it not nerd news, it a completely waste of time.
Slashdot Mirror
Here is the thing.
Every time series discussion starts to happen, certain politician derail, misdirect, or blatantly stop the discussion.
It doesn't fit their constituent theology and/or ideology.
Since disease means the world will become too polluted and warm for human civilization, most main stream 'cures' won't be worse.
they are deniers, not skeptics. Skeptics apply critical thinking and make an effort to understand the science.
Deniers don't do either.
What correct means in this case is 'control for known variables.'
As an example. Suppose you have a thermometer above a surface that will make the thermometer read 2 degrees warmer.
You control the variable(correct). and subtract 2 degree for the appropriate times.
That is just a simple example i an ideal world with no other factors. Don't take it to e anything more than that.
You are not a skeptic. Skeptics use critical thinking skills. You are a denier who thinks they are skeptical.
"The ground station temperature data has been quite thoroughly manipulated, always "adjusted" in the direction of confirming the theories of the researcher making the adjustment, Pardon my skepticism about that data."
False.
" But now there's this new satellite data that must be "processed" to be understood."
Like ALL satellite data.
You really don't know what you are talking about. Why don't you turn your so called skepticism on those very claims?
No we have not seen 'ice grow like crazy'. Not at all.
We have seen some more snow fall in some area, but the overall loss dwarfs that new snow fall.
Stop thinking surface, and start think mass.
Antarctica and Greenland are losing 450 billion tons of ice every year
Once again you don't talk about AGW science facts, only you misunderstanding of a high quality science report.
BTW AGW and Climate change are different things. If you can not understand even that basic fact, then you have no hope of understanding the basic facts of AGW.
coincidentally:
Nascar fans equal waste.
It's a phone. Why the hell are you taking calls with it? :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
It's a factory the makes gigawatts worth of batteries.
Duhr.
You may have to extend it in some cases, but that's normal.
'I ain't gots no data, and I's can'ts be wrong, therefore everything is a conspiracy'
That what you sound like to every person who actually know the science.
It means new and complex.
It's a horrid term, but it's been used regarding software since the beginning of software.
Not likely since AGW is based on science, and scientific method. Where as deniers are just a bunch of dolts with no science behind them. Ask yourself this: How come AGW deniers never talk about the actual science?
They make post like you do: No evidence, no data, every scientist, every agency, every competing country are all in some conspiracy and only the enlightened few* can see 'The Truth!'
*get over yourself already
wow was never hard, that's what made it popular, and better, then previous games like EQ.
Oh, an attack on people who use console.
The real problem is, you are an asshole.
news at 11.
You wouldn't think Supernintendo Chalmers would make that mistake.
I'm sorry, but I consider that one of the funniest quotes from the Simpsons and I love to work it in.
- He was suspended due to a "bizarre" four page letter that he wrote to county officials, that raised mental health concerns.
- He has not been arrested, and is not being charged with any offence
- It does not appear that his mental health evaluation was mandatory or coerced in anyway other than as a condition of returning to work.
Is it that journalism doesn't exist, or that you just don't know how to use google?
His book had nothing to do with this. Nothing at ALL.
This slashdotter summarized it nicely:
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Except that's not what happened. Please stop blindingly believing anything that fits you dumb ass narrative.
Because it fits their narrative.
They same thing for everyone who just immediately gets outraged, then when presented with actual facts, they deride said facts. Often even getting angrier.
The first thing you do if you value actual critical thinking is point that at your sacred cows and do some slaughtering.
"puts this wall between you and that sweetness" /. is the Windows ignorance.
The best thing about Windows discussion
You're stupid.
Since it's on one(1) major news site, as a 'round up of everything' it's not a media blitz of any sort.
" Nazi Feudal state"
sigh. grow up and stop being a useless turd.
He isn't a posturing light weight.
What should he do about issues in another country, about a different country, that impacts Europe?
Europe had the chance to stop him, but the were to afraid their economy might not grow as fast as they like if they did.
China? WTF about China?
ISIS? he has the same problem every world leader has. ISIS isn't a country. It's a group of people. Maybe the next time an unarmed person gets killed by a cop, Europe should send it troupes? OR after the bombing in Boston, how would you have felt if China sent in troupes to fix the problem?
Grow the fuck up and learn to deal with complex problems like a thinking adult.
Nothing that you list is anyway the US's fault, much less Obama's fault.
", NATO will just have him assassinated."
please go back to reading political thriller books and leave the political discussion to the adults.
A) That's not what happened
B) There are better places for it
C) How is not putting a widely circulated piece on Slashdot burying ones head in the sand?
" Departments of Defence[sic] routinely engage in offence at the drop of a hat. We routinely see far more aggressive language coming out of the White House." /. regarding politics or economics.
blatantly false, but the exact kind of stupid that comes from
So not only is it not nerd news, it a completely waste of time.