So would all people find a Ferrari more stimulating (neurologically speaking) than a Nano or does it depend on culture?
If it is inbuilt and not a cultural difference perhaps it is possible to extrapolate an idealised design of an object people will perceive as 'valuable'. Could be useful for marketing purposes.
I just installed this to have a look at it. Didn't appear in OpenOffice. OK, guess I did something wrong. Fiddled about, removed, reinstalled, regenerated font-cache.
Nope.
Checked another applicaion...nope no 'Ecofont'
*30 infuriating minutes later*
THE FONT NAME IS 'SPRANQ ECOFONT'? Dear holy frak that took me ages to find. Who the hell prefixes their goddamn font with a company name. No one. God that pissed me off. MOTHERFUCKING *VENTING* GRRRRR.
It's presented at install time, you can get a refund if you don't accept it.
The more important point is that companies use the eula as a tool to bury relevant tidbits of information (like, say, only three installs per disk) which would hurt sales if they were well publicized.
You pay for the right to download it. Once. To a system that you know is closed. Why would anyone expect Sony to allow their bandwidth to be re-used for free?
It's not like they're being anything other than upfront about it.
If you move to another system where you no longer have the movie in future: just buy it again. It will be cheaper (in terms of YOUR PRECIOUS TIME) than fiddling about with moving files from one machine to another.
Looks good to me, the foreboding blackness of the text ('Error establishing a database connection') contrasting relentlessly with the bleak and brilliant white background.
Guns - banned in the UK for years Knives - banned on the streets (concealed/lock knives/fixed > 3 inches) for years Drunken Louts with theit angry fists - unlawful behaviour for years (public order acts)
Pulic Demonstrations/rallies - Happen all the time. Literally, people do this in London every day of the year for some cause or another.
Any dissent at all? Satire, and general piss taking of government policy is as strong as it ever was.
This is just alarmist prose. If you think it needs to be said - then at least say why.
I have never once in my life seen a knife that was designed to be a weapon.
Sure hope that stays true. You don't want to see a flick knife/gravity knife, butterfly knife whilst walking home at night.
In the UK it is an offense to carry and of these knives: They are all specifically designed as weapons. It is also an offense to be carrying any knife with a fixed blade greater than 3 inches on there person. There are provisions for carrying cuttlerey home from the store.
Well, people do get hurt for the sake of videos. Look up 'happy slapping'.
I'm not sure what YouTube is expecting to achieve here though. Any speculation as to their motives?
So if Mr. Schwartz could demonstrate that the machine consistently and accurately measures the blood alcohol content of a known sample, that be satisfactory without seeing the source?
If on the other hand if this can't be proved, then the read out shouldn't be admissible, and seeing the source is irrelevant.
Sure it is a BurgerFlipper degree
No, it is a one day course.
Universities love serving up shit like this because it's an easy way to get funding for having lots of students without having to have pesky stuff like chemistry labs and professors that know a thing or two.
Not really. This is a one day philosophy course. I'm beginning to suspect you may not have read the article, or at least understand it.
Perhaps this is at least stupid enough that it gets the attention of parliament etc to rethink the role of universaities.
Parliament decided to make students pay for tuition through the nose long ago - anything that allows universities to raise cash will not be looked down onby the government. And.. I don't think this is stupid. I really hope this attracts people who'd otherwise discount any form of educatoin as viable.
Slashdot Mirror
So would all people find a Ferrari more stimulating (neurologically speaking) than a Nano or does it depend on culture?
If it is inbuilt and not a cultural difference perhaps it is possible to extrapolate an idealised design of an object people will perceive as 'valuable'. Could be useful for marketing purposes.
So have the Vietnamese authorities defined what a 'Blogger' is? Because no one else seems to have a clear definition.
Second Post!
I just installed this to have a look at it. Didn't appear in OpenOffice. OK, guess I did something wrong. Fiddled about, removed, reinstalled, regenerated font-cache.
Nope.
Checked another applicaion...nope no 'Ecofont'
*30 infuriating minutes later*
THE FONT NAME IS 'SPRANQ ECOFONT'? Dear holy frak that took me ages to find. Who the hell prefixes their goddamn font with a company name. No one. God that pissed me off. MOTHERFUCKING *VENTING* GRRRRR.
Nice font though.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet?
This would be funny if it wasn't so disheartening that a government so glibly warps reality.
It's presented at install time, you can get a refund if you don't accept it.
Actually scratch that..thte eula is available here, and doesn't mention anything about refunds, that's pretty shitty.
It's presented at install time, you can get a refund if you don't accept it. The more important point is that companies use the eula as a tool to bury relevant tidbits of information (like, say, only three installs per disk) which would hurt sales if they were well publicized.
Were you typing that with vi or something?
You pay for the right to download it. Once. To a system that you know is closed. Why would anyone expect Sony to allow their bandwidth to be re-used for free?
It's not like they're being anything other than upfront about it.
If you move to another system where you no longer have the movie in future: just buy it again. It will be cheaper (in terms of YOUR PRECIOUS TIME) than fiddling about with moving files from one machine to another.
*irony ends*
Maybe the cracker is a /b/tard who harbers a grudge against some suburban kid who's gonna grow up to be a volvo-driving banker.
Looks good to me, the foreboding blackness of the text ('Error establishing a database connection') contrasting relentlessly with the bleak and brilliant white background.
Magic.
Bullshit!
Guns - banned in the UK for years
Knives - banned on the streets (concealed/lock knives/fixed > 3 inches) for years
Drunken Louts with theit angry fists - unlawful behaviour for years (public order acts)
Pulic Demonstrations/rallies - Happen all the time. Literally, people do this in London every day of the year for some cause or another.
Any dissent at all? Satire, and general piss taking of government policy is as strong as it ever was.
This is just alarmist prose. If you think it needs to be said - then at least say why.
I have never once in my life seen a knife that was designed to be a weapon.
Sure hope that stays true. You don't want to see a flick knife/gravity knife, butterfly knife whilst walking home at night. In the UK it is an offense to carry and of these knives: They are all specifically designed as weapons. It is also an offense to be carrying any knife with a fixed blade greater than 3 inches on there person. There are provisions for carrying cuttlerey home from the store.
Well, people do get hurt for the sake of videos. Look up 'happy slapping'. I'm not sure what YouTube is expecting to achieve here though. Any speculation as to their motives?
So if Mr. Schwartz could demonstrate that the machine consistently and accurately measures the blood alcohol content of a known sample, that be satisfactory without seeing the source? If on the other hand if this can't be proved, then the read out shouldn't be admissible, and seeing the source is irrelevant.
Sure it is a BurgerFlipper degree
No, it is a one day course.
Universities love serving up shit like this because it's an easy way to get funding for having lots of students without having to have pesky stuff like chemistry labs and professors that know a thing or two.
Not really. This is a one day philosophy course. I'm beginning to suspect you may not have read the article, or at least understand it.
Perhaps this is at least stupid enough that it gets the attention of parliament etc to rethink the role of universaities.
Parliament decided to make students pay for tuition through the nose long ago - anything that allows universities to raise cash will not be looked down onby the government. And.. I don't think this is stupid. I really hope this attracts people who'd otherwise discount any form of educatoin as viable.