Slashdot Mirror


New Font Uses Holes To Cut Ink Use

An anonymous reader writes "A Dutch company has taken an open source Sans Serif font and added holes to it to try and save on printer ink costs. The Ecofont is claimed to save up to 20 percent of ink costs, but it allegedly took the firm a while to perfect the ratio of the maximum number of holes possible without sacrificing readability."

540 comments

  1. Practicality? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks interesting, but probably not very practical. Surely simply printing in draft mode and in grey-scale is an easier way? On screen this is probably going to be more headache than its worth.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Practicality? by iYk6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On screen this is probably going to be more headache than its worth.

      On screen it isn't worth anything. But really, this is obviously a gimmick with little to no benefit. Much like Blackle.

    2. Re:Practicality? by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ahhh... so, bonus points for @media print{body{font-family:Spranq Eco Sans;}}?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Practicality? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're not getting it. Those are speed holes. They make the font faster.

      I'm waiting for the serif version of that font; there they'll replace the serifs with spoilers. I also think they will add a special Type-R sticker glyph in a Unicode Private Use Area to make it go even faster. Then the only thing that could possibly beat the font would be drift typing - but everyone knows that technique can be handled only by the most extreme Japanese fonts.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Practicality? by Garganus · · Score: 1

      drifting OT here, but just... WOW. I'd not seen that. How sublime.
      Throw everything you've ever known about bleed and contrast ratio out the window; Blackle says displaying dark images and backgrounds on your monitors saves energy. Brillant!
      (ah; to be fair, they do make the plasma/lcd distinction in their faq.)

    5. Re:Practicality? by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Looks interesting

      No, looks like complete and utter crap.

      And I say that as someone who encourages people to print in the most severe toner-saving mode their printer has; as someone who duplexes everything, often 4-up per side; someone who considers a 9pt font shamelessly wasteful for anything but a presentation-quality final result.

      I also say it as someone who doesn't get all elitist about fonts (I happen to like Comic Sans, ThankYouVeryMuch), as long as they don't hurt to read.

      And Spranq Eco Sans hurts to read. At large sizes, it looks like a billboard with all the lights out, and at small sizes it looks like someone ran it through the shredder and taped it back together. Just way too visually distracting to even consider.

    6. Re:Practicality? by rm999 · · Score: 0

      I just tested it out on a laser printer, and I agree. I compared this font to Arial at the following fonts: 10, 11, and 12. While it doesn't look nearly as bad as it does on screen (the ink seems to spread out on the paper and mostly fill the holes), there is less ink and therefore the letters are less dark. It is similar to draft mode on my inkjet.

      Still, I think it's a cool idea. If a printer doesn't have a draft mode, this really would save ink. It is perfectly legible, the holes are only noticeable if you already know about them, and the potential savings seem to be very real.

    7. Re:Practicality? by DiegoBravo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> someone who considers a 9pt font shamelessly wasteful for anything but a presentation-quality final result.

      Maybe using a bit bigger font size will save in your future ophthalmologist bills.

    8. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Draft Mode + Grayscale + Holey Font > Draft Mode + Grayscale

    9. Re:Practicality? by TornCityVenz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you tested it on a laser printer is it very unlikely that the "ink" spread out to fill the holes. laser printers use toner.

      --
      I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    10. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I say that as someone who encourages people to print in the most severe toner-saving mode their printer has; as someone who duplexes everything, often 4-up per side; someone who considers a 9pt font shamelessly wasteful for anything but a presentation-quality final result.

      Thanks for the information about yourself! So basically you're a holier-than-thou dickhead. Sweeeeeet.

    11. Re:Practicality? by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was true for most CRTs, as the natural color of the screen is black, and it takes extra energy to generate the light to make it a brighter color. Therefore having most pixels be dark saves energy

      However, most LCD's behave the exact opposite. LCDs have a backlight, so their natural color is white. It takes energy to make the liquid crystal block out some or all of that backlight, so the more white pixels you have, the more energy you save.

    12. Re:Practicality? by David+Nabbit · · Score: 1

      So your font is holier than thou?

      --
      "Her idea of wit is nothing more than an incisive observation humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing."
    13. Re:Practicality? by rm999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah touche, I apparently don't know much about printers :)

      In that case, the holes are too small for me to see. Either way, the effect comes off well.

    14. Re:Practicality? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      But it is particularly important to use this font on the screen, because all that black takes more electricity!!

      [ :P ]

    15. Re:Practicality? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >>>It is similar to draft mode on my inkjet.

      That's essentially what this font is - for running off documents you're likely to throw away. For your resume you would not want to use it, unless you're applying to work for the EPA.

      When I want to save paper or ink, I just use the "9 pages per page" setting. That's how I printed-out the 7 Harry Potter books.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    16. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not really true. LCDs generally use exactly the same amount of power regardless of how dark the image is they're displaying. The amount of current needed to switch a pixel's orientation is pretty much negligible.

    17. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you had to copy/paste that word from Wikipedia to get it right.

    18. Re:Practicality? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Yes, but LED backlighting changes that equation yet again

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    19. Re:Practicality? by stupido · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. LCD pixels consume energy *in addition* to that consumed by the backlight. So more of them on won't save you power.

    20. Re:Practicality? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      It's not as if it's GP's idea to use 9pt:

      The letters don't appear clear on my screen.

      The Ecofont works best when using font size 9 or 10. The results vary depending on your software. If you work on a Windows platform you could use ClearType.

      http://www.ecofont.eu/faq_en.html

      These Ecofont folks say that 9- to 10-point is, for visual quality, as good as it gets. So your eyes will suffer either way.

      And the type is based on Verdana, for Hoefler's sake! Ick!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    21. Re:Practicality? by holy_calamity · · Score: 1

      You're not getting it. Those are speed holes. They make the font faster.

      Gentoo users can tweak the eco-font with --omfg-so-green and --funroll-loops to make it both faster still, and even better for the environment.

    22. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fart can. Don't forget the fart can.

    23. Re:Practicality? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Even if the printer doesn't have "draft" mode you could still change the font colour to 80% gray and accomplish the same thing.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    24. Re:Practicality? by default+luser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but LED backlighting changes that equation yet again

      So will OLED displays, once they take over the market in [5, 10, 20, 50] years.

      Yes, in fact, a high-enough resolution LED backlight can theoretically add extra contrast to a display, while reducing power consumption. Of particular interest is producing colored backlighting to match the picture using the RGB LED arrays.

      Sure, current LED arrays have problems with lighting uniformity, but from experience, I can say the exact same thing of early flourescent backlighting (late 90s). It's only a matter of time before we can toss the inefficient flourescent backlighting of current LCDs, and move-on to something much better.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    25. Re:Practicality? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, did you read it with a magnifying glass? 4 pages per sheet is difficult enough to read... I used 2 pages per sheet when I wanted to save paper, and that was about right as far as reading it without straining your eyes.

      Then again, I'm thinking of letter-sized pages. I guess book pages would be smaller anyway — unless they were scanned as facing pages?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    26. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's either true, or the most awesome bullshit I've read this year!

    27. Re:Practicality? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      The rest state of an LCD pixel allows the backlight to shine through. By applying an electric current to the crystals for each pixel, the crystals rearrange in such a way that they block the light from passing through, but the backlight behind it is still on. Thus it consumes more energy to display black than white.

    28. Re:Practicality? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. It's possible to create LCDs of which the opposite is true.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    29. Re:Practicality? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But to be fair, the amount of energy to make an LCD display an all-black screen is only a trivial amount more than the energy to have the LCD display an all-white screen. By far, most of the energy is consumed by the backlighting.

      With everyone using LCDs these days, there's really no point to worrying about saving energy via different background colors, screen savers, etc.

      (Of course, I'm typing this on a system with a giant 90s-era Sony CRT that's about 23" diagonal and weighs about 100 lbs. Luckily, my employer is paying the power bill, since they're too cheap to upgrade me to a large LCD.)

    30. Re:Practicality? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I was going to post a simple joke about ecocondoms...
      then I saw your post and my head asploded.

      Those are speed holes. They make the font faster.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    31. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... your laser printer uses ink?

    32. Re:Practicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been added to my all time favorite Slashdot posts. Pure awesome.

      Posting anon to avoid zealous mods

  2. This is pointless by toby · · Score: 5, Informative

    These people don't seem aware that typefaces are usually available in many weights.

    You can save much more than this by simply changing to a lighter weight.

    (I am a typographer. But it shouldn't take one to figure this out.)

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:This is pointless by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering, since you are an expert... :)

      Shouldn't they have done this with a serif font if it is meant to save ink/toner? Does anyone print sans-serif?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:This is pointless by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, but lighter weight fonts don't have the magical prefix "eco" in front of their names.

    3. Re:This is pointless by pbhj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Shouldn't they have done this with a serif font if it is meant to save ink/toner?

      Surely all the serifs would cancel out the saving from the holes?

    4. Re:This is pointless by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yea, Light is so last century. It's all about the Eco now.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:This is pointless by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shouldn't they have done this with a serif font if it is meant to save ink/toner?

      They started with a serif font. What's left is sans serif.

    6. Re:This is pointless by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What I meant is, they seem to have modified a screen font. If you are trying to save toner/ink, I would think that choosing a printed font would be more effective.

      I know that you CAN print a sans-serif font, but I thought that the rule of thumb was that serif fonts should be used for print.

      That said, I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about - thus why I asked the question :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:This is pointless by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

      I use "Arial" for almost everything that I type and/or print, and it is a sans-serif font.

    8. Re:This is pointless by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 5, Funny

      That said, I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about

      Don't worry, it doesn't show.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    9. Re:This is pointless by nschubach · · Score: 3, Funny

      So "green" is the new "pink" and "eco" is the new "black"? Or is "black" the new "light"? I'm so confused.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    10. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a typographer, so I'll forgive the oversight of the fact that fonts/typefaces cost $Big$Money$ and most people only use the dozen or so "free" ones that come with every computer.

      It's much simpler just to tell your printer to use less ink, and let the printer drivers handle everything for you.

      Oh, and has anyone else noticed that this company's name is "Spranq", pronounced (I assume) sss-prank, as in "It's a prank"? I think this is just a prank making fun of the "green movement". (I last had one when I ate too many Flintstone's vitamins, myself. Too much iron.)

    11. Re:This is pointless by genner · · Score: 5, Funny

      So "green" is the new "pink" and "eco" is the new "black"? Or is "black" the new "light"? I'm so confused.

      You are so dead at the next zebra crossing.

    12. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My designer loathes you and me :/

    13. Re:This is pointless by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes but lighter weights either make the font thinner and harder to read, When it prints it uses a dithering option to get the lightness sometimes giving it a choppy edge to it. This font makes sure the edges are solid allowing you to more clearly read the font.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re:This is pointless by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Actually, "zero" is the new "light", let me show you an example:

      Diet Coke -> Coca-Cola Light -> Coca-Cola Zero

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    15. Re:This is pointless by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      These people don't seem aware that typefaces are usually available in many weights.

      Yep. Having worked to tweak a font so, I'm sure they'll be embarrassed to discover that there are others out there.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    16. Re:This is pointless by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      You do realize that they are a dutch outfit? Now, maybe giving your company a nonsense name vaguely phonetically similar to some English phrase in order to make some subtle point is a secret Dutch fad; but I doubt it.

    17. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it's true... right?

    18. Re:This is pointless by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sans Serif mean that there are no feet at the bottom of letters.
      Serif means that there are feet at the bottom of letters.
      Arial is sans serif
      Times is serif.

      Serifs are easier to read on paper as the eye can follow the font easier due to the visual definition of each letter and the apparent line along the base of words.

      FYI: sans (FR)=without

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    19. Re:This is pointless by JustinKSU · · Score: 1

      Most reports my company prints uses a mono-spaced font. It would be nice if they came up with a Courier New like font.

    20. Re:This is pointless by SocialEngineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      It used to be argued that serif fonts were more readable than sans in print, but recent studies have shown that it likely isn't the case. Things like x-height, width, weight, letter spacing, etc have more bearing than serif or not. (I work at a newspaper that still has a print following, and also do independent design).

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    21. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about

      Welcome to Slashdot!

    22. Re:This is pointless by Lobais · · Score: 1

      Also I believe some applications let you choose a colour for your text. For example grey.

    23. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So "green" is the new "pink" and "eco" is the new "black"? Or is "black" the new "light"? I'm so confused.

      You are so dead at the next zebra crossing.

      Or "crosswalk" for our American friends.

    24. Re:This is pointless by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      That would have made many of the letters off-balance causing them to fall over.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    25. Re:This is pointless by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      On my Acorn Archimedes with dot matrix printer, I would often save on printer ink by producing outlined lettering on big text. One of the benefits of having scalable vector fonts and the tools to turn them into paths back in 1988.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    26. Re:This is pointless by pipatron · · Score: 1

      My designer has the font name "Helvetica" tattooed on his fore-arm.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    27. Re:This is pointless by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Wait, they make zebras in pink now?!

    28. Re:This is pointless by cpicon92 · · Score: 0

      rtfa: "We tried lots of possible ink-saving-options. From extra thin letters to letters with outlines only."

    29. Re:This is pointless by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Sort of a greyish pink, what with them being black and white and red all over.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    30. Re:This is pointless by Ironica · · Score: 1

      There are both serif and sans serif fonts designed for screen readability and print readability. Geneva (sans serif) and New York (serif) were the classic examples of screen fonts from the old Macintosh era. They look hideous when printed.

      One convention dictates that sans serif fonts should be used for headings, and serif for paragraphs, due to readability.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    31. Re:This is pointless by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Newspapers are ususally more concerned with legibility than readability: how much can we pack on a page and still have the reader make it out at all, not how fatigued the reader is after reading hundreds of pages. Maybe you're an exception, but on the whole newpaper fonts tend to be different from book fonts in just that optimization choice.

      If you have studies that show you can pack text as densely on the page with sans-serif fonts as serif, I'd believe that. The legibility advantage of serif fonts was largely in the redundancy provided in case part of a letter broke off in the press - hardly a concern with modern equipment.

      But for reading a book's worth of text, serif fonts win hands down. I *hate* technical books where some asshole thought it would be clever to use a sans-serif font to show how technical the book was - as I grow older, this sort of thing causes me physical pain. The changing of the default Word font from serif to sans will be a source of annoyance for years to come, and no doubt cause me to toss that many more resumes on the "ow, my eyes!" pile.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    32. Re:This is pointless by lgw · · Score: 1

      Usually, (paper) printed material uses sans-serif header fonts over serif body fonts. The exception is advertising copy, where you have a small count of words on the page and style trumps substance anyhow.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re:This is pointless by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      I thought "Coca-Cola Zero" was a description of the taste.

    34. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he's trying to prove it they're the same, I suppose.

    35. Re:This is pointless by Garganus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      *shudder* Created out of desperation to sidestep Adobe's closed Type 1 font standard, disseminated by Microsoft because of its cheapness, now widely used as most will overlook its comparative weaknesses; you are not alone in defaulting to it, Arial .

    36. Re:This is pointless by karnal · · Score: 1

      You mean like...

      Courier Newer?

      haahaahaaaa!

      --
      Karnal
    37. Re:This is pointless by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      So he doesn't forget how to spell it?

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    38. Re:This is pointless by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      Many companies have standardised on sans-serif fonts for internal documents to optimise on-screen readability. These then get printed before meetings, etc and thrown away shortly thereafter.

    39. Re:This is pointless by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it's tattooed in Helvetica or a similar font like Arial?

    40. Re:This is pointless by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Of course, this new "holey" font would be completely unsuitable for the use you just outlined... :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    41. Re:This is pointless by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I understand that... I guess I have SOME idea what I'm talking about, then :)

      So since you usually print with a serif font, why did they modify a sans serif font? It just seems a bit of an odd choice to me. Now I'll switch from my little delicate serif fonts to a big chuncky sans serif to... save ink??? LOL. It's a bit counter-productive.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re:This is pointless by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      what font's it in?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    43. Re:This is pointless by pbhj · · Score: 1

      [...] I thought that the rule of thumb was that serif fonts should be used for print.

      Yup, that's my understanding too.

      The linked pages mention that they think businesses mainly print in sans fonts and that's why they adapted such.

    44. Re:This is pointless by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I thought "Coca-Cola Zero" was a description of the taste.

      No, zero refers to the pH.

      (I made it nerdy!)

    45. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      claiming legitimacy just makes you look pompous. feel free to leave it up to reader assumption that you know anything. that helps the rest of us feel better.

    46. Re:This is pointless by billcopc · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I just switched the /. font to serif, and I find it illegible. Perhaps I'm too used to sans-serif fonts. I actually can't scan the text anymore, even after increasing the font size.

      Mind you, I hardly read any hard-copy, so YMMV.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    47. Re:This is pointless by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about "Coca-Cola Light", but Diet Coke & Coca-Cola Zero are different. They use different sweeteners. (I haven't ever tasted them side by side, but I've bought both, and can't tell the difference between them this way.)

    48. Re:This is pointless by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Go down to your local newsagent, and look at the print in a selection of magazines and newspapers. The majority of magazines, and even a good proportion of newspapers use sans-serif fonts these days. They are easier to read, not just on screen, but in print too.

    49. Re:This is pointless by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Oops, just checked a selection on my desk myself, and it seems the fonts are still serif, they've just toned them down to be more subtle than the traditional Times style serifs. Wired magazine does use sans-serif fonts in some sections, but the longer articles are using serif fonts.

    50. Re:This is pointless by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      aaaah, can't breathe... This is so funny, you made my day today, thanks.

      And it was a hard day, I was looking at /. just before going to sleep, after 22h of nonstop work :/ Good night.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    51. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone is the same. My friend is dyslexic, and serif fonts look like scrambled spaghetti to him. On the other hand, sans fonts are easy to read.

    52. Re:This is pointless by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's damn near sans font.

    53. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] I thought that the rule of thumb was that serif fonts should be used for print.

      Yup, that's my understanding too.

      The linked pages mention that they think businesses mainly print in sans fonts and that's why they adapted such.

      Hasn't anyone taken at least an intro course of desktop publishing?

      Both serif and sans-serif fonts are designed for print. Body text should generally be serif, as it is easier to read for sustained lengths of time.

      By contrast, sans-serif better provides emphasis, and is best used for headlines, banners, logos (unless the company wants to look distinguished or traditional), and short lines of text.

      So you're right that most businesses who don't print books or newspapers would favor sans-serif fonts for most purposes.

    54. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serif fonts were traditionally thought to be somewhat more legible for body copy, but whether that is 'true' or not doesn't carry too much weight anymore. San serif fonts are used for body copy in magazines and elsewhere all the time. They are also popular as display typefaces, especially in signage where they are probably more clear and legible than their fancy counterparts.
      Maybe it's a sign of the times that the default typeface for Word 2007 is Calibri, a san serif typeface, not Times New Roman, a serif, as in older versions.

    55. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite sure what you are saying.

      This is a partial hoax, because they would not be able to make the cartriges. These probably cannot be made because the company would not let it be. HP would never do this.

      I think that the person is trying to say toner as ink. Toner is not liquid. That substance that is in it costs a lot of money on the market.

    56. Re:This is pointless by routerl · · Score: 1

      And wouldn't it save vastly more ink if, instead of holes through the letter faces, the font were merely the outline of letters? This is clearly a marketing ploy, just like most new "green" inventions.

      --
      Trust me, kids; don't drink and post.
    57. Re:This is pointless by vonart · · Score: 1

      Comic Sans, obviously.

      --
      The American Dream has too much grinding and the leveling makes no sense. -GameboyRMH (1153867)
    58. Re:This is pointless by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try loading it up and reading a page. It's painful. A lighter weight is far more pleasant than this mess.

    59. Re:This is pointless by JoshJ · · Score: 1

      The Coca-Cola Co. formulated "New Coke" based on the Diet Coke recipe. Coke Zero is literally the standard Coca-Cola with a different sweetener.

    60. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is this Font person anyway?

    61. Re:This is pointless by coolsnowmen · · Score: 2, Funny

      wingdings

    62. Re:This is pointless by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      These people don't seem aware that typefaces are usually available in many weights.

      You can save much more than this by simply changing to a lighter weight.

      (I am a typographer. But it shouldn't take one to figure this out.)

      Exactly, I glanced their font home page, and saw they even *had* to use a heavier weight to make the "eco" part (in the new typeface) more readable. Eyeballing the looks of it, it seemed to only be lighter if using the same weight as a traditional font. But then this new font is far less readable. So... I'm not sure what's won.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    63. Re:This is pointless by dmneoblade · · Score: 1

      I recommend watching the documentary by the same name. It can be quite interesting to step back and see how something as innocuous as a font can effect things on a large scale

      --
      Warning, knife is sharp. Please keep out of children.
    64. Re:This is pointless by jsoderba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hence the difference between "screen font" and "print font". Sans-serif are easier to read at low resolution because the letters are less complex (which is also why they are used in headlines and signs), while serifs make it easier to track a line in long, closely spaced text like a book.

    65. Re:This is pointless by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      Is this some sort of reverse cultural chauvinism? All the world has been dominated by the Anglo-American culture and language for a century or more.

    66. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss Crystal Pepsi :(

    67. Re:This is pointless by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      LOL, I was wondering where you lived because before I posted I checked out a half dozen magazines and newspapers laying around :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    68. Re:This is pointless by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Serif / Sans Serif aside, Verdana is still a screen font, and that's what they based this on. Printing in Calibri is odd, too, since that was designed for LCDs in particular.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    69. Re:This is pointless by Zashi · · Score: 1

      That was so bad if I had mod points, I'd mod you up.

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    70. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dutch marketing and communications company Spranq.

      This is a marketing company, not a type foundry.
      They were probably more like "hey, this eco-thing seems to be the latest gimmick, let's create something eco-ish on this and maybe websites and newspapers will advertiseme us for free!"

    71. Re:This is pointless by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. Japanese.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    72. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing interesting about this is the spin they put on it. I could go to any font site and find hundreds of variations of this style.

    73. Re:This is pointless by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Diet Coke was intentionally designed to taste more like Pepsi (or so I've heard... I can't find much to back it up).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    74. Re:This is pointless by treeves · · Score: 1

      Better still, use an outline font at larger size, print it out, then fill in all the characters with a pencil or crayon. Dramatic ink savings!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    75. Re:This is pointless by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I can just see it now... "I apologise for the unprofessional appearance of this memo; the laserjet was getting low on toner but luckily I had my 3-year-old as backup..."

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    76. Re:This is pointless by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well put. There are also a couple of great serif screen fonts, once the resolution gets high enough. Microsoft's times font is really nice at a large enough size on my 1920x1200 screen -- which makes it such a tradegy that they're dumping it -- but that's the rare exception because the font is entirely hand-crafted.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    77. Re:This is pointless by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Serifs are easier to read on paper as the eye can follow the font easier due to the visual definition of each letter and the apparent line along the base of words.

      This is subjective. In print, I personally find sans-serif fonts easier to read and more pleasing.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  3. Horrible by WPIDalamar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At big sizes the holes make it look horrible. At small sizes it's not all that readable as far as fonts go.

    You might as well print at 80% grey instead of black to get the same savings and have it look better.

    1. Re:Horrible by pbhj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From the website:

      View the Ecofont

      In the picture you can see how the Ecofont is created by omitting parts of the letter. At the shown size, this obviously is not very nice, but at a regular font size it is actually very usable.

      It must look pretty horrible at smaller sizes too otherwise I think they might have shown us a sample, no?

      If they'd constructed it out of Sierpinski gasket they would have saved a lot more!

      Nice bit of viral marketing for Spranq methinks.

    2. Re:Horrible by Timmmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not supposed to look good on screen. It is to save ink when printing.

    3. Re:Horrible by wondershit · · Score: 1

      It must look pretty horrible at smaller sizes too otherwise I think they might have shown us a sample, no?

      Then zoom out? But then given the limited density of pixels on the screen how do you suppose to see a usable result? (from Wikipedia: displays have something between 67 to 130 PPI, a laser printer has 600 to 1800 DPI).

    4. Re:Horrible by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      It must look pretty horrible at smaller sizes too otherwise I think they might have shown us a sample, no?

      Maybe not. The font is obviously designed to be printed not for on screen use. So while an on screen preview of the font at smaller size may look bad (I imaging those holes could alias badly), it is conceivable that in print (with higher DPI) it could look nice. It is even possible that at smaller sizes in print the eye might start to ignore those holes and see the letter as if it were solid.

      I'm not saying it will look good when printed (my guess is it probably still wont), but looking at on screen previews is definitely not a fair test.

    5. Re:Horrible by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      I imagine it relies on the fact that the brain will 'get rid' of the holes when looking, and/or slight bleeding from the printer will cover the holes up.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    6. Re:Horrible by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah, I know. I went to the site hoping to see what the new font looks like, and I clicked on the "view the font" button and all it showed was a few giant letters. And like you mentioned, it says, but don't worry, it looks okay at smaller sizes! ... which it doesn't show.

      I know that standards in general have kind of deteriorated lately, but is it really too much to ask that a site promoting a font ... show you what that font looks like in its intended size? Sheesh!

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    7. Re:Horrible by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      If they'd constructed it out of Sierpinski gasket they would have saved a lot more!

      That was awesome.

  4. Unfortunately by brian0918 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Unfortunately, the font is only available at 120pt or higher, so it will takes twelve times the paper to print out your book report."

    I'm willing to make that sacrifice if it means saving Mother Earth!

    1. Re:Unfortunately by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Are you saying you didn't use larger fonts and creative line spacing when you needed to write a multi-page book report?

      My teachers didn't want double spaced, but never caught on to spacing between 1 and 1.5.

    2. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, look at you, you "gamed the system". Maybe if you had actually focused on your studies, and on doing the actual assignments, instead of being an intellectually lazy parasite, you wouldn't be in a dead-end IT job right now.

    3. Re:Unfortunately by slash.duncan · · Score: 1

      A lot of people say my writing is too wordy now, and really, if I work at it, I can often cut way down while still conveying the same message, but it takes several drafts and a LOT of work.

      I blame it on all those stupid assignments asking for an X page report when the info could be easily covered in .2X. So now most of my writing is stuffed full of flowery language and way in excess verbage (spelling deliberate, see the FOLDOC or jargon file definitions), due to the necessity of developing that habit in school. I couldn't tell you how many long hours I spent developing it to the level of an art form, and now I have trouble due to my perfection thereof. =:^(

      --
      Duncan
      "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master,
      and if you use the program, he is your master."
      R Stallman
    4. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think you can save the planet when you can't even save your own @$$

    5. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's more like 144 times more paper.

    6. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in highschool I refused to write X page reports if I thought that X pages would suffice. Of course the teacher didn't agree with me, but I was a stubborn kid. I had this idea that essays should always be written in a point-proof-discussion type format and should be kept short and concise. Until years later I read something I had written and realised how BORING it was to read. Now when I write, my goal is to keep the reader interested.

    7. Re:Unfortunately by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I always detested writing reports and, as I was lucky enough to be homeschooled up through high school, I usually found a way to avoid writing them. (My writing skills, however, didn't seem to suffer... I did have plenty of practice in grammar and spelling. My writing skills ended up being pretty good, although I still hate writing reports – the subject has to interest me, and somehow "Find a subject that interests you and write a 5-page report" doesn't motivate me.)

      I typically write concisely and understandably, and I'm pretty good at forming a logical order in my writing. However, when I got to college I did have to write reports with minimum page requirements, and since I never got into the habit of inflating my writing my conciseness tended to work against me.

      Even in college I never really acquired the habit of inflating my writing, though. Generally I wrote it the first time without thinking about the page limit. Then, I usually ended up splitting paragraphs that could feasibly be made into two paragraphs and very briefly expounded on both halves so they could stand as separate paragraphs. The end result was typically that last sentence of the first paragraph summarized the second paragraph and the first sentence of the second paragraph summarized the first paragraph.

      Now when I write there's usually no need to take extra time to make something longer, so the first writing of it is all I bother with. However I usually do try to proofread it and check for misspellings, dropped words, and anything that turned out to be ambiguous or misleading.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:Unfortunately by slash.duncan · · Score: 1

      I can't really proofread well for either wrong-word (I have a spell-checker) or missing word, at least until much later, as I find I often fill in the right word even for others' writings, let alone my own. Sites like /. where someone comes along and calls attention to such gaffes, often have me going back to reread the original and see that indeed, my brain did automatically fill in the right word.

      For that reason, when I preview I often don't reread the entire thing, just symbol-scan to see if any were "eaten" by things like /.'s infamous "plain text", and quick-read to see that the overall thought pattern is reasonably cohesive.

      I really hated writing as a kid, and typing thru highschool (tho it was fine on the computer, but typing class was still electric typewriters at the time and I hated that tho I took a year of it to better interface with the computer!), but now I have an ergonomic "split" keyboard (Logitech Cordless Desktop Pro, held in my lap but with frequent position changes) and can compose and type for hours at a time without issue. But my handwriting is worse than ever, since now on top of what was bad to begin with, my fingers just keep wanting to type the letters, so I get a decent number of extra "typing" squiggles in my handwriting. So I do as little as possible, and print some of the time when I must handwrite and it's for someone else to read. But the "typing squiggle handwriting" syndrome probably afflicts quite a number of /.ers.

      Back on topic, I don't particularly mind the font, even on-screen (fairly high resolution LCDs), and in fact switched to it in a couple font-preferences. I'll see how it goes for a few days.

      --
      Duncan
      "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master,
      and if you use the program, he is your master."
      R Stallman
  5. Not just for saving ink by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just imagine how many electrons could be saved if people used this font in their browser.

    1. Re:Not just for saving ink by thewiz · · Score: 1

      Use it as your default font on your computer; you'll be able to get the same resolution on a 20% smaller monitor!

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    2. Re:Not just for saving ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wouldn't it actually be using MORE electrons to display all those nice glowy white spaces?

    3. Re:Not just for saving ink by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

      or started using LCDs instead of CRTs.

    4. Re:Not just for saving ink by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      No, silly, you'd be using white text on a black background. The holes would be black.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    5. Re:Not just for saving ink by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      On an LCD, you should use a dark theme in the winter so that the dark pixels soak up the extra backlight photons and convert them into heat. In the summer, go with a lighter theme that will let all of the photons out before they have a chance to run up your AC bill. Oh, and make sure you set the monitor up near a window so the extra photons can just keep right on going.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Not just for saving ink by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

      The horrible part comes when you do a screen print and forget to swap the colors, thus negating all that money you were saving on toner.

    7. Re:Not just for saving ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that most web pages use white backgrounds, a proper web font should occupy MORE space, so as to minimise the amount of visible background (which is what really draws power).

    8. Re:Not just for saving ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, silly, you'd be using white text on a black background."

      YUCK!!! I gave that color scheme up with MS-DOS 6.

    9. Re:Not just for saving ink by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      You were modded funny, but I bet if I told certain people this, they would believe me...

    10. Re:Not just for saving ink by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just imagine how many electrons could be saved if people used this font in their browser.

      I always recycle my electrons.

    11. Re:Not just for saving ink by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      If the holes are black, then the entire font can be a "hole" on a white background...

      Reminds me of philosophy...

    12. Re:Not just for saving ink by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Funny

      They have monitors that have white? Mine is only green text on a black background.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    13. Re:Not just for saving ink by pompom246 · · Score: 1

      Imagine all the electrons they wasted just developing their little "eco" font. And all the more they'll waste distributing yet another font to a large enough population to have any effect on ink consumption.

      Computers kill electrons, people.

      Oh the humanity...

    14. Re:Not just for saving ink by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 4, Funny

      You got green? Mine is black text on a black background. I have to guess what everybody is saying.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    15. Re:Not just for saving ink by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bonus tip: if you put everything in quote tags, it saves on black electrons.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    16. Re:Not just for saving ink by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it actually be using MORE electrons to display all those nice glowy white spaces?

      I think you mean photons, unless you're talking about a CRT. CRT's don't "use" electrons, they briefly "free" them from the restrictions of metal into a spacious vaccum, where they dance and rejoice until they smash into a phosphor at the other end of the tube.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    17. Re:Not just for saving ink by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      How much energy, if any, would be saved worldwide if Google had a black background and not white? My first thought is that the power use is the same regardless of what is displayed, but I am not entirely positive this is the case. Any electrical engineers want to confirm this?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    18. Re:Not just for saving ink by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Just imagine how many electrons could be saved if people used this font in their browser.

      I still use a CRT display, you insensitive clod!

      The more black, the better, because the electron gun can be shut off for those few nanoseconds it takes to color a pixel.

    19. Re:Not just for saving ink by makapuf · · Score: 3, Funny

      meh, BLINK tag save FIFTY PERCENT of the electrons !

    20. Re:Not just for saving ink by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Once I'm done with them I send them right back to the power company.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    21. Re:Not just for saving ink by Repton · · Score: 1
      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    22. Re:Not just for saving ink by svank · · Score: 1

      meh, BLINK tag save FIFTY PERCENT of the electrons !

      Careful! I've heard rumors that using the evil blink tag is about as dangerous as using goto.

    23. Re:Not just for saving ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternating current does not work that way!

    24. Re:Not just for saving ink by Miseph · · Score: 1

      So are black electrons now worth more to you than white electrons? That's racist.

      White (electron) Power!

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    25. Re:Not just for saving ink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonus tip: if you put everything in quote tags, it saves on black electrons.

      Now now, are you racially discriminating electrons?

    26. Re:Not just for saving ink by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know what you mean! The real problem with tennis, though, is that you can't really get good at it until you have genital herpes, or at least that's the image that the commercial media wants you go believe. That, and riding bicycle, are both things that you can do once you get herpes and start taking Valtrex.

    27. Re:Not just for saving ink by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I always recycle my electrons.

      Ahh, that explains why your posts always seemed a bit dull. I thought it was just you.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. This is the printer's job. by booyabazooka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The 'economy mode' on my rather old laser printer basically does this. It just sort of prints letter outlines instead of the full letter. Ecofont's solution seems like... leaky abstraction? The print-saving settings are now embedded into a document rather than determined at print time. Sounds like a terrible idea for a problem that's already been solved.

    1. Re:This is the printer's job. by tirerim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most economy modes (at least on inkjet printers) just print the letters lighter; this should provide additional savings over that. It may well be more readable than just outlines, too -- I find outlined text very hard to read.

    2. Re:This is the printer's job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Economy mode" is still a feature of modern printers/printer drivers - it may not be called this exactly (it is often defined by a "quality" setting and a value of "draft"), but they achieve the same thing. But yes, I agree, the print quality is not something that should be embedded into a document but determined at presentation time. After all, why should one have to view poor quality fonts on-screen just because one want to save ink when printing?

    3. Re:This is the printer's job. by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 1

      Actually there is no need to embed knowledge of this particular font in the document -- this font (or any font modified via this process for that matter) can simply be substituted by the printer to produce a higher-quality economy-mode result. Good news for many routine printing application not traditionally well-suited to economy mode printing.

  7. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by neokushan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tell you what, when you can come up with a better way to save 20% of the ink used on a printed document, then you can say it's stupid. Until then, I think it's a cleverly simple idea.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  8. Wouldn't it be easier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to simply use a little less ink by printing each letter a little lighter? For example, turning on the "toner saver" mode in a laser printer. Particularly given that the "ecofont" is recommended for laser printers.

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be easier... by nizo · · Score: 1

      Finally, a reason to dust off all those eco friendly dot matrix printers that have a "draft" mode.

  9. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a way to save 100%. Don't print it!

  10. Actually... by toby · · Score: 1

    Numbered among the Dutch are many of the greatest living (and dead) type designers in history.

    This idea is pretty dumb though, and seems to be born of typographic ignorance.

    --
    you had me at #!
  11. Outline eco-mode by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This has been a feature in printer drivers for donkeys ages ; I remember an "eco" mode that only printed the outlines of the font. Much more flexible than having to use a particular font, and not all that noticable at smaller print sizes.

    1. Re:Outline eco-mode by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I also remember using a matrix printer with three different quality levels. The lightest draft mode was fine for everything. Higher levels were produced by printing the same line again several times, with a slight offset to fill the spaces.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  12. Too bad the font is *ugly*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the font weren't so gosh-darn ugly, I might think about using it. On the other hand, consider how much time I'll save not reading things because they're ugly.

    (Hey, it worked for dating.)

  13. Holy Illegible Font, Batman! by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know you were thinking it.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Holy Illegible Font, Batman! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aw darn, you beat me by 3 minutes.

    2. Re:Holy Illegible Font, Batman! by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

      Let's make it a tag!

    3. Re:Holy Illegible Font, Batman! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      *swoop* You rang?

  14. Re:Errr, it won't cut laser toner use... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Probably why the summary and article say "ink" and not "toner".

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  15. But how much e-ink by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Funny

    will it save while I view documents on my ereader?

    1. Re:But how much e-ink by drspliff · · Score: 1

      How many pixels will it save?

      Think about it, 60hz refresh rate, 500 pixels saved every 60th of a second..

      Oh, wait! Bugger.

  16. Re:Errr, it won't cut laser toner use... by clone53421 · · Score: 1
    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  17. The obligatory line: by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holy Fonts, Batman!

  18. Horrible on screen by F�an�ro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks absolutely horrible on screen, fuzzy and irregular letters at lower font sizes.

    And at bigger sizes the holes themselves start to look jagged.

    does that improve in print?

    1. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, but from your description it sounds better than most of the fonts currently available to Linux users.

    2. Re:Horrible on screen by Galaga88 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I printed off a quick test to an HP LaserJet 4100 from Word 2007 in WinXP, and it looks a lot better in print than on screen. 10 & 11 point being where it looks best. You can still see the holes, but they're not as glaringly obvious or jagged as when displayed on screen.

    3. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Printed it at work (using laser printer tho) and it looks very good on paper.

      I agree it doesnt look so good on screen tho... i guess you could do switch font before printing and ctrl-z'ing after...

    4. Re:Horrible on screen by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      That makes sense.
      Average screen resolution: 1024x768
      Average screen size: 17"

      That means your screen has a pixel density of ~ 85x64 pixles per square inch.

      Average printer pixel density (laser) ~ 300dpi.

      Yeah, monitors have bad resolution (don't even get me started on the 60" HDTV's...)


      Disclaimer: Numbers pulled out of my ass...

    5. Re:Horrible on screen by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Or just set your printing to print at 80% greyscale. They you don't have to change your font but it takes 20% less ink anyway.

    6. Re:Horrible on screen by ortholattice · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It does print OK, even though the screen display is awful.

      The following isn't a criticism of just this font, but of almost every "modern" font. This just happens to be a particularly notable example.

      It seems to be in vogue these days to ignore the hints needed for limited screen resolution, particularly with antialiasing turned off. Try this experiment: if you're on Windows, turn off ClearType. Compare the horrible screen display of this font with the carefully thought out bit-mapped screen fonts of Arial.

      It takes time to do it right, and I guess in this hurried modern world there just isn't time for craftsmanship anymore.

      Most designers also probably assume that everyone has antialiasing turned on. I don't, because it makes things look fuzzy, sometimes with vague rainbows bleeding out of the edges. I know I'm in a minority, but still I don't think that I'm the only one who prefers the crispness of a carefully designed bit-mapped font. Off and on I've tried to get used to antialiasing, but in the end I go back. (ClearType also makes the period and comma almost indistinguishable in the 8pt Andale Mono I prefer for text editing.) Since I can usually select old-fashioned fonts with excellent bitmaps, it rarely is a problem, except that there doesn't seem to be any font with good bitmaps for Unicode math symbols.

    7. Re:Horrible on screen by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Funny

      But how much ink got wasted by everybody on /. firing up their laser printers?

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    8. Re:Horrible on screen by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      That's because you have an inkjet screen. It sprays small color droplets onto the backside of the glass pane; however, these droplets tend to bleed out, creating that jagged look. Invest a couple hundred dollars in an entry-level laser monitor and tell me if you still see those jaggies.

      (Note: Laser monitors don't always work under Linux and in some cases might not display anything but PostScript documents.)


      As for me, I'm still using an old dot matrix display, so I'm stuck with fixed-font text mode.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's time for you to upgrade from XFree86's collection of bitmap fonts? Xorg's server has supported truetype fonts for several years now.

    10. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang! You actually went out and did your own research instead of being an armchair quarterback? You're like my hero!

    11. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I printed off a quick test

      Way to save ink!

    12. Re:Horrible on screen by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      My laser printer does 2400 dpi horizontally and 600 dpi vertically (which they call 1200 dpi), and that is a LOT more than screen resolution, even with a really good monitor. Then again, that is not exactly the toner saving mode... but still: bitching about how this font looks on screen or with a crappy printer -> fail.

    13. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent -1, Masturbatory blathering that is only relevant and interesting to the person making the post

    14. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, by printing out a quick test page you've probably consumed as much toner as would be saved by using this font on hundreds of pages, plus you've wasted an otherwise useless piece of paper :-)

    15. Re:Horrible on screen by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      There must be a whole lot of optical illusion issues with such a dotted design.

    16. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My laser printer does 2400 dpi horizontally and 600 dpi vertically (which they call 1200 dpi), and that is a LOT more than screen resolution, even with a really good monitor. Then again, that is not exactly the toner saving mode... but still: bitching about how this font looks on screen or with a crappy printer -> fail.

      No it doesn't. Just because they advertise the specs that way doesn't mean that's what it actually does. In reality it's somewhere between 150 and 300 dpi.

    17. Re:Horrible on screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't save any ink/toner in a laser printer just because you print with less black. B&w laser printers are already more environmental friendly then inkjet printers as it is. The only thing they consume is soot and electricity and most of that electricity is spent during warm up.

    18. Re:Horrible on screen by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Not only did you pull those numbers out of your ass, I can't even figure out what formulas you used...

      Anyway, monitor resolution is typically considered to be about 75 dpi.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:Horrible on screen by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Arial isn't a bit-mapped font, it's TrueType. It's just been carefully designed to 'fit' onto screen resolution so that the edges of the font match nicely with the pixel borders.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    20. Re:Horrible on screen by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      Arial isn't a bit-mapped font, it's TrueType. It's just been carefully designed to 'fit' onto screen resolution so that the edges of the font match nicely with the pixel borders.

      Maybe I didn't say it right - I didn't mean to imply it was a a bit-mapped font, but that its final manifestation on the screen was a bitmap - and yes, what you say is exactly what I meant. The key is "carefully designed" to "match nicely with the pixel borders" - sadly, font designers rarely seem to do that anymore. It seems to be a lost art.

    21. Re:Horrible on screen by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      And if you even looked at my final numbers, they were 85 horizontal and 64 vertical. 75 is pretty much the average of those two. Unless you meant 75 dots per SQUARE in, which I would find highly suspect...

    22. Re:Horrible on screen by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Well, I figured out what you did... you used height and width equal to sqrt((17^2)/2). You are aware that computer screens are not square? In fact, the aspect is closer to 3:4. (The resolution is also 3:4, by the way.)

      So the formula SHOULD be 17^2 = (3n)^2 + (4n)^2, which comes to n = 3.4, so height = 10.2" and width = 13.6". Those dimensions give 75x75 DPI, as I said before.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  19. Re:+1 PARENT. Saves paper too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how you get modded off-topic and some effin' cookie recipe gets modded informative. Slashdot's going to pot.

  20. gray color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't printing using gray color produce the same effect with any font?

    1. Re:gray color by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but it uses up all your gray ink.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    2. Re:gray color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually our Epson does have two gray inks in it, or light black and light light black as they amusingly call them. See Ultrachrome K3.

  21. Draft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or a company could just use the "draft" feature that most every bit of software has when the said person is not in need of presentation quality. Probably redundant, but yeah

  22. In other news... by Subm · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news several Dutch legal firms were visited by executives from Epson, HP, and Lexmark, muttering about theft of lost revenues.

  23. Re:Errr, it won't cut laser toner use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's only on shitty printers. Real ones recycle the toner.

  24. Dot Matrix Draft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I prefer to use Inverted Ecofont, in which everything else is removed and only the holes remain. This saves 80% of the ink, and it known to some people as "dot-matrix draft mode".

    This is new font is stupid and not news.

  25. Depends... CRT, Plasma, LCD, or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a CRT, plasma, or other direct emission display (OLEP, etc), the more black, the better.

    On the other hand, on an LCD it can be more complicated. Is the resting state of the pixels "open" or "closed" to light? If "on" is the resting state, then the whiter the better. On the other hand, if "off" is the resting state, the blacker the better. On the third hand, if the display has a dynamic backlight that can be dimmed to provide blacker blacks, even with "on" as the resting state, with less backlight, "off" could be the overall lower power state.

    Things sure were easier back in the monochrome character-generator-display days. To use less power, you'd just shut up and type shorter posts. :D

  26. "gayestwebsiteever" tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously guys, can we grow up? Humorous or ironic tags are one thing, but this is just absurd.

  27. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by megamerican · · Score: 5, Funny

    I agree. Their idea is redundant as most letters come pre-made with holes in them.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  28. Re:Errr, it won't cut laser toner use... by Psychotria · · Score: 1

    Well the summary and article may have said that. But from the ecofont website:

    Printing with a laser printer will give the best printing results

    http://www.ecofont.eu/look_at_ecofont_en.html

  29. I counteract this by cheftw · · Score: 0

    I print all my documents inverted so this will actually cost me more ink!

    --
    Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
    1. Re:I counteract this by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Funny

      I print on the finest amazon rainforest paper, with several layers of black ink, and then dust the wet ink with ground up dark-roasted panda bones.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  30. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by megamerican · · Score: 1

    Another way to save 100% of ink is to print it in braille.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  31. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by OglinTatas · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Exactly. Which is worse, a few squirts of ink, or all the trees that are cut down so you can print out your inbox?

  32. better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just cut off the parts of the font that arn't needed

    for starters, start off with an arial-looking font, you don't need all the little hooks at the end of each part of characters, that's wasted ink!

    you'd probably be better off simply cutting out bits of each letter, for instance, if the pixel that connected the loop of the "e" to the rest of it suddenly was gone, no one would have trouble seeing it was an "e" even at small fonts... a similar solution could probably be found for most characters.

    hw abt usng txt tlk n jst omt sum vwls r sumtn?

    in general it's a bad idea.

  33. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny

    f u cn rd ths u cn sv on prntg cst...

    ask me how!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  34. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    You have to use a font that is thick enough to have a bunch of holes cut out of it. You could save even more ink by printing in a smaller font.

    That assertion is based on cost figures for newspaper classified pages; drop the font size, save a ton of ink and paper. Papers all over the country have been doing this for years as their margins shrink.

    But apparently they could have switched to this larger font with holes in it! Genius!

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  35. Fuck EcoFont, I want GreenFont... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..this is getting retarded.

  36. That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My eco-efforts included making mine thinner...

  37. I agree many things don't need to be printed by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But for those that do need to be on paper, you can save 20% just by using a 10 point font instead of a 12 point font!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by ConfitureDeConfiture · · Score: 5, Funny

      12 * .8 = 9.6 LIAR!

    2. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by von_rick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or modify English spellings to conform with those used by 13 y/ olds in their text messages.

      u cn save ink n papr 2 !

      --

      Face your daemons!

    3. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by Annorax · · Score: 0, Redundant

      AKA: Dudespeak

    4. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by neokushan · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's assuming that a font size of 12 wasn't used for a reason (such as readability - I, myself, have trouble reading a font size of 10 due to an eyesight condition I have and before anyone says, no, glasses do not help) and the same reasoning can be applied to a font size of 10 - why not drop it down to 8? At least with this font, the idea is you don't have to change your font sizes or anything yet still be able to save a bit more ink. It's crude, but it could certainly be effective if used correctly.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    5. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

      aawwwwwwwwwww datz riily riily smart!!!!!!!!!!!!"##

    6. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by severoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      u cn save ink n papr 2 !

      What?

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    7. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by EventHorizon_pc · · Score: 5, Informative

      12 point font means the font's vertical size is 12/72in = 1/6th of an inch.

      Keeping a constant aspect ratio, the ink savings would be (12*12-10*10)/12*12 = 30.56%

      For 20%, sqrt(.8)*12 = 10.73pt font. He was underestimating! ... and yet, no one cares....

    8. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by LunarCrisis · · Score: 1

      x^2
      ---- = 0.8 -> x = sqrt(0.8 * 12^2) -> x = 10.733    AREA FAIL
      12^2

      --
      Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
      Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
    9. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't you have to account for the saved horizontal space also, seeing as how more words would fit on a line?

      Yay needless specificity!

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    10. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Note that the parent has definitively shown how such changes would not save ink.

      Flmb8 my a$$!!!!!111oneoneoneeleventytwo

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    11. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Or atleast that you can't just assume that it would save letters, especially then ... everyone .. separates.. sentences ... like weird!! I like -: vnv nation :- -: pokemon :-.. (^_^) and end sentences with !!!!!!!!

      But don't worry about it, I'm used to retarded users using their mod points even though they don't have a clue. They have removed that moderations of moderatorsthingy?

    12. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by ChangelingJane · · Score: 1

      If we're going to take it this far, we might as well also factor in the amount of text that is boldfaced. Also, some fonts use different shapes at different sizes--a well-designed font isn't just uniformly scaled when you change the point size.

      This is what I get for taking typography class. OCD +1!

    13. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by raynet · · Score: 1

      Even better, just use 6pt font and give people magnifying glasses, or they could use xerox machine to enlarge the prints when they actually need to read them.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    14. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      If only it was just 13-year olds who write like that these days.

    15. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      No... 10pt font is smaller in two dimensions, not one; you'd be able to fit much more than 20% extra on a page.

      Tested in MS Word: Single full page, default settings (letter, default margins, Times New Roman font); character used was lowercase 'a'.

              12 pt: 3,726 characters
              10 pt: 5,432 characters

      That's 45.8% more.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    16. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      GP accounted for that. Recall 'constant aspect ratio' and notice he used sqrt() to compute the savings.

      In fact, there seems to not be a constant aspect ratio... the actual savings is even better. My test indicated that 10 pt font gave a 45.8% increase in characters-per-page as compared to 12 pt font.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    17. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      No, print everything on microfiche and have them use microscopes to read it!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    18. Re:I agree many things don't need to be printed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u cn save ink n papr 2 !

      But you can't save the English language...

  38. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by Fael · · Score: 5, Funny

    You forgot the clever part.

    Poke holes in the cookies before serving. The cookies are now 20% healthier!

  39. out of ink? by shafty023 · · Score: 1

    just looks like the printer is running out of ink

  40. Gray shading by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    Why not just print with the printer in "eco" mode or change the font color from black to dark gray? And, as another poster suggested, use a font with a smaller footprint (e.g. Courier New rather than Times New Roman).

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  41. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by rvw · · Score: 3, Funny

    f u cn rd ths u cn sv on prntg cst...

    How... Wow... Did you learn that in SMS-class? I have a better idea however. It seems that only the upper half of the letter is necessary for reading. That would save 50%!

  42. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by D+Ninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as a company is concerned - the ink is a bigger problem. It costs a whole lot more.

  43. Re:+1 PARENT. Saves paper too. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 0, Troll

    No, we're trying to increase the quality of the trolling.

    I'd rather see cookie recipes than the shit-eating porn or the guide to caring for your new nigger or hidden links to goatse guy.

    Cookie recipes? Fucking A delicious... even if the recipe is a little wrong.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  44. Invisible Ink... by Seismologist · · Score: 1

    I use invisible ink so you can't see how much ink I use. I also use CIA font for this ink in case you're wondering.

    --
    ~ In Trust, We Trust ~
  45. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by D+Ninja · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes. I love the "paperless" route. I wish I never saw a piece of "real" mail (other than computer parts) or anything else like that in my entire life. It's such a waste of time, landfill space, the killing of trees, etc, etc, etc. Paper is not a necessity except in a few (and becoming fewer) cases.

    Now, of course, try convincing people who haven't worked on a computer their whole life of that fact.

  46. What a waste! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ecofont" uses 75% more letters than plain old "font".

  47. Repurposed by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The software item with the greatest practical joke potential since desktop look-alike screensavers.

    "I printed the nozzle check pattern a million times but my documents still all look like crap!"

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  48. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, everyone gets all up in arms about using paper. Do none of you realize that paper is a renewable resource?

  49. Real Conservationists....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...print everything as an outline.

    Plus you have the added fun of being able to color in all the letters later!

  50. Dutch? Really? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would've expected such an idea to come from Switzerland.

    1. Re:Dutch? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Swiss are confident they can rest their laurels on their ecocheese that the world has enjoyed for many years. No need to come up with other products containing holes.

    2. Re:Dutch? Really? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Actually, you have serendipitously identified the origins of the Helvetica font.
      This font is used almost everywhere and on most products and was invented by the Swiss.
      They even made a documentary about it. Look here

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    3. Re:Dutch? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

    4. Re:Dutch? Really? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Whoosh to you numbnuts. I get the joke "Swiss Cheese with holes" but evidently you don't grok the meaning of serendipitously

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  51. Looks like letters in the freeway signs. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    On the certain freeways signs they used a bunch of reflective dots on the pattern of letter or symbol and this font looks like that.
    Good for rough drafts and other non-production work. However if your work is doing eco-friendly work maybe this font will be great to show how you are helping the environment.

  52. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most paper will be readable in 30 years. Will your digital documents?

    Microsoft Word dropped support for old document formats fairly recently, so even if you've still got a medium which is readable (cdroms in 30 years? Probably not...) you've got to worry about the file format.

  53. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Firehed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Paper trees are always re-planted after being cut down (it would get unsustainable very quickly if this didn't happen) - and generally also have a lot of recycled material in the final product. The tree-cutting damage comes from the food industry clearing the way for beef cows or corn crops.

    Never mind how insanely expensive ink is. The wasted ink is by far worse than the wasted paper. If you want to save a few sheets, shrink your print margins; either way, there's really no net gain or loss in trees.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  54. Re:Errr, it won't cut laser toner use... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Oh, heh. That's funny.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  55. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by RichardJenkins · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just installed this to have a look at it. Didn't appear in OpenOffice. OK, guess I did something wrong. Fiddled about, removed, reinstalled, regenerated font-cache.

    Nope.

    Checked another applicaion...nope no 'Ecofont'

    *30 infuriating minutes later*

    THE FONT NAME IS 'SPRANQ ECOFONT'? Dear holy frak that took me ages to find. Who the hell prefixes their goddamn font with a company name. No one. God that pissed me off. MOTHERFUCKING *VENTING* GRRRRR.

    Nice font though.

  56. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Feanturi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go stick your head in a pig!

  57. In Gray? by hhr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why don't you just print in say 80% blakc? If you have a color printer, you'd have to turn off the printers ability to help out with ink from the color cartridge. But, other than that, this should be the same thing

  58. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by againjj · · Score: 1

    How about printing the glyph outlines. On the old Macs, this was a standard option.

  59. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by jenn_13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That assertion is based on cost figures for newspaper classified pages; drop the font size, save a ton of ink and paper. Papers all over the country have been doing this for years as their margins shrink.

    ...yet another way to save paper :)

  60. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by eosp · · Score: 1

    "Adobe Garamond"?

  61. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most paper is made from tree farms or recycled paper, so you're not really wasting any trees. At least that's the case in the United States.

  62. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

    If ink/toner costs are a serious concern for your company then you probably have bigger problems.

  63. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by aliquis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a much better one, change the quality settings in the printing dialog. There you have it ..

    I doubt it will be less readable than that crap and it will also work for all fonts and images and so on ..

  64. All this talk of ink and no-one's mentioned cheese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmm, Edam

  65. Remember the promise of computers? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Ages ago we were told computers would make the world paperless.

    What ever happened to that?

    1. Re:Remember the promise of computers? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      We realized that it's hard to pick up a desktop and carry it to a meeting. That handheld devices are expensive, with small, hard to read screens. That it's a lot easier to take a pen to a sheet of paper to write notes than it is to type. That there's no good way to distribute copies of a document to everyone at a meeting.

      Yeah, there are solutions to all of these things, but none that are as cheap and user fiendly as good old paper. Laptops are large and distracting. PDA's don't have good input devices. Tablet PC's might fit the bill, but they are expensive and have never really caught on, especially important in the meeting scenarios.

    2. Re:Remember the promise of computers? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Nothing. The world just changes more slowly than people expect. The technology we use now has replaced some uses of paper - mostly in places where it's non obvious. When was the last time you signed for a package on paper? Sent a paper office memo?

      It'll be a long time before we can replace things like paper packing slips. Consider replacing them with RFID - every recipient would need a reader for that to work.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    3. Re:Remember the promise of computers? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The explosion of information that computers allowed led to more being printed for a time.

      The paperless thing is catching up though, and less paper is being consumed year on year (even before the economy started tanking hard, though not a trend yet).

      Less letters being sent between places, and short memos in the office, was counteracted by 100 page power-point handouts at every meeting.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  66. Coming soon... by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

    The eco-boat.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Coming soon... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Eco-Windows. Oh, wait.

  67. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yah. It's renewable. But we're using it at a faster pace than it can be renewed. Wood fibre in general... it's not *just* paper that's causing problems, mind you... the construction industry is using an awful lot of wood, too. But we *do* need to reduce our consumption of wood, and it's a lot easier to reduce the amount of paper you consume than it is the amount of wood the housing industry consumes. Every little bit helps.

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  68. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by aliquis · · Score: 1

    And for saving other things you could make sure everyone print ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FUCKING PAPER. Quite obvious but how many places do?

    Another alternative would be to print on A5, I doubt it will lose much reading comprehension vs this.

  69. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well since the paper comes from tree farms and the trees are replanted like vegetables are my guess is the Ink.

    I also makes a good way to suck carbon out of the atmosphere. Tree eats CO2, tree becomes paper, paper becomes buried at landfill.

    It's much better then recycling paper where it has to be taken to the recycling plant to be sorted, then taken to a factory to wash the ink off using toxic chemicals and then taken to the paper factory to be used in new paper.

  70. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, as I watch the cleaning crew at work put the trash and the recycling bin contents into the same trash can every night...

  71. Mod parent down! by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, guys. I'm not that funny.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    1. Re:Mod parent down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, guys. I'm not that funny.

      Yeah, we know.

    2. Re:Mod parent down! by johanatan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, really. You are. If i only had a mod point to burn, I could bring the post to +5!!!!

    3. Re:Mod parent down! by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ironically, it was, then somebody modded it down.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    4. Re:Mod parent down! by johanatan · · Score: 1

      And, at your request I suppose. I'm actually pretty surprised that your 'Mod parent down' post didn't get modded down as 'off topic' (and those between here and there too). But, at this level, I suppose we're under the radar!

    5. Re:Mod parent down! by fortapocalypse · · Score: 1

      And then I posted this which stayed at 1 because everyone was out of points, uninterested in an old topic, and what I said was not funny or insightful. Whoops, -1 troll.

    6. Re:Mod parent down! by berend+botje · · Score: 2, Funny

      For us that read at -5 you're never under the radar. We see you. Always.

    7. Re:Mod parent down! by lewko · · Score: 1

      My God. I just tried reading at -5.

      The horror.....

      And what the hell is the GNAA anyway?

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  72. Re:+1 PARENT. Saves paper too. by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm going to make the cookies tonight. I'll let everybody know.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  73. A day in the font by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read Slashdot today, oh boy
    Four thousand holes in ecofont sans serif
    And though the holes were very small
    They had to count them all
    Now they know how many holes it takes to fill "the Albert Hall"
    I'd love to turn you on

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:A day in the font by Alarindris · · Score: 1
      Woke up
      Got out of bed
      Checked slashdot and then i said

      Woke up
      Got out of bed
      Checked slashdot and then i said

      Woke up
      Got out of bed
      Checked slashdot and then i said

      maybe im still drunk...

    2. Re:A day in the font by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read Slashdot today, oh boy
      Four thousand holes in ecofont sans serif
      And though the holes were very small
      They had to count them all
      Now they know how many holes it takes to fill "the Albert Hall"
      I'd love to turn you on

      Jâ(TM) fais des trous, des pâ(TM)tits trous, encor des pâ(TM)tits trous
      Des pâ(TM)tits trous, des pâ(TM)tits trous, toujours des pâ(TM)tits trous
      Des trous dâ(TM) seconde classe
      Des trous dâ(TM) premiÃre classe
      Jâ(TM) fais des trous, des pâ(TM)tits trous, encor des pâ(TM)tits
      Des pâ(TM)tits trous, des pâ(TM)tits trous, toujours des pâ(TM)tits trous
      Des petits trous, des petits trous,
      Des petits trous, des petits trous

  74. Etch-a-Sketch by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

    Just give me a printer that draws on an Etch-a-Sketch. Ink problem solved.

  75. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by aliquis · · Score: 1

    And forests all over the (measured part of the) world is growing except in rain forest areas.

    Which obviously is the worst place to do it at together with fucking up the oceans both by pollution and the damn fish eaters =P

    I guess one can find bad paper, and in some cases you probably replace a nice mixed forrest with a boring whatever-pine-tree-one but anyway. Give me leafs!

  76. Why it works, and why other ways are better. by DTemp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It works via dot gain (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_gain), where ink tends to spread on paper. This happens with both inkjet and offset presses.

    This would be much better implemented as part of the pre-press process of the publisher. The publisher could select all headlines, and apply a "holes" pattern much more specific to their press and their ink levels.

    1. Re:Why it works, and why other ways are better. by windex82 · · Score: 1

      I work at a grand format digital print company and trying to figure out if there are any cases we could use this, saving ink on the big printers would be awesome. Unfortunatly all text we print is generally as big as your head. We would need something with lots of much smaller holes since our viewing distances are usually in the dozens of feet.

      Also, instead of having to print the entire document in draft mode any background art can be kept at regular quality. I would be surprised to find this couldn't be done through the RIP making this largely pointless.

    2. Re:Why it works, and why other ways are better. by foo12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is already done with flexo printing where you're working with ink coverage limitations and a stock and printing process that are prone to dot gain. Sometimes it's better to keep a .5pt solid holding rule and fill with a 98% screen with the understanding that 98% is going to gain up to 100%.

      That said, ink cost on a press run is an almost negligible part of the equation. It's really not a cost savings on even a large press run.

    3. Re:Why it works, and why other ways are better. by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Awright?

  77. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by aliquis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know for you but for me 99.9% of the paper I consumed won't be readable in a year, because I will have thrown it away.

    Text-files? I'm sure they will.

    PDF? No idea.

  78. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

    ASCII and Unicode are going to be around for a long, long time. Same with Bitmaps, PNGs, GIFs, JPEGs, postscript, TeX, HTML, and dozens of other formats.

    If you're storing all your documents in Proprietary Paperless Document Imaging System 2000<TM>, then yeah, be very afraid. Otherwise, not so much.

  79. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 4, Informative

    Coming from a University that bought 10 pallets a year of paper and a truck load of toner, it's a big cost. Switching fonts to save 20% would be a very nice savings.

    --

    Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
  80. Cuts ink, will one day waste energy by caywen · · Score: 1

    When the world moves to OLED displays, the holes will increase the number of white pixels, which will increase energy consumption! That's assuming most programs show text on a black background... The contribution to greenhouse gases will be enormous. This font alone will cause the destruction of New York, Deep Impact-style. Mark my words.

  81. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by dargaud · · Score: 4, Funny

    At work we have one of those industrial printers that puts a header page with the name of the person doing the print job in big ahead of the job. Then we more or less 'sort' them on tables for people to come an pick up. There are users with thousands of pages accumulated over a few weeks gathering dust in a huge pile.
    Since there are printing costs overruns, I suggested we should charge people by the number of pages not picked up at the end of the month. My suggestion was quickly shot down. I'll never make it into management.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  82. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    Unfortunately, since you don't take ink seriously, I'm guessing you are spending too much printing your newsletter and will be out of business shortly.

  83. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Poke holes in the cookies before serving. The cookies are now 20% healthier!

    One Christmas I was at my Mom's house. She is a "low sodium" believer. She salts nothing at all, and has a shaker on the table for those who want some taste in their food. (She has also lost all sense of smell, which is a large component of food taste, so she doesn't notice the lack of salt at all. She's easy to buy for for Christmas presents; I go to Goodwill and get empty bottles of high-price perfume, fill them with isopropyl alcohol, and give them to her as the real stuff. She can't tell that it isn't.)

    I went to refill the shaker. She had a box of "low sodium salt" on the shelf. "20% less sodium" it said. Wow. Perhaps this was a mix of table salt and potassium chloride?

    It looked different. Table salt is usually sold in the cubic crystal form. Tiny cubes, just the way that salt will crystalize out of a concentrated solution of brine, which is part of the salt making process. This stuff was powdery.

    I looked closer at the label. Contents: sodium chloride and iodine. Typical table salt.

    To make a long story short, I realized that this company had done something to "fluff up" the normal salt crystals to make them larger and put only 13 ounces (by weight) of product in a box that normally contains 16. A "teaspoon" of this product actually contained 20% less sodium than "normal" salt, simply because it contained 20% less product by weight.

    I considered that to be false advertising, but technically, the box did contain 20% less sodium than normal table salt boxes of the same size, and by volume, it was 20% less.

  84. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, but you're going to produce way more CO2 in transport and processing of that paper than is trapped in the paper. You're logic is flawed

    --

    Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
  85. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    That'_ simp_e just _iss out e_ery f_fth le_ter.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  86. The Beatles called ... by clyde_cadiddlehopper · · Score: 0

    How many holes does it take to fill "the Albert Hall"?

    --
    Obi-Wan: "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were sudden
  87. Bell Centennial (phonebook font) had holes in 1976 by kriegsman · · Score: 1

    The Bell Centennial font, designed in 1976 for printing phonebooks, had "holes" designed into it for (excess) ink to flow into without compromising readability. http://www.nicksherman.com/articles/bellCentennial.html Interesting to see how the 'benefit' of holes has changed.

  88. Doesn't address toner page counters by Jon-1 · · Score: 1

    It's too bad this won't do much for the toner cartridges of the world that use page counters to estimate the quantity of toner remaining. I'm pretty sure our HP color laser and Brother multifunction aren't actually out of toner when they say they are. I've heard of these companies using an odometer of sorts to count to x pages of toner life and then call it dead regardless of actual toner usage.

    Another point against Ecofont if they recommend laser printing over inkjets.

    1. Re:Doesn't address toner page counters by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      If laser printers really do this, then how do they implement the "toner save" feature? Does the printer simply subtract an arbitrary number of pages when that mode is turned on?

      On another note, I find that most laser printers display "toner low" long before they should, but don't actually shut off. My dad's Dell laser at work said "black toner low" for almost a year before the printer actually stopped printing - and he uses it every day.

  89. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Can u pls use SI units? :)

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  90. another neat idea..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's not very practical. I would NEVER use this in a business setting. Take the pink copy of a duplicate set of forms and make a copy, then take that copy and scan it to pdf format to email, then print that at the other end. It's hard enough to read solid black text sometimes.

    It doesn't take long for a document to become unreadable, and if all the text had holes then documents would be impossible to use at all after a few copies of copies.

    Text with holes would quickly merge into a noisy background and become unreadable fast. Yay, you saved 20% of the toner used by people who do casual printing at home while doing nothing for businesses who use far more toner and ink.

    This is like the air powered car. A neat idea that's pretty useless and causes more problems than it solves.

  91. Oh, the waste! by kooky45 · · Score: 1

    Won't anyone think of the gallons of ink and hundreds of trees that will be wasted by people printing pages to test this?

  92. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by SolusSD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    decrease the font size by a couple points. That'll decrease the amount of ink needed *and* won't be ugly. Or, just don't print it in the first place. Most text printed these days (especially around the office) never needed to be printed in the first place.

  93. Typophile.com by PancakeMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typographers' discussion here: http://typophile.com/node/52616

  94. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by von_rick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In our University, printing used to be free until 2 years ago. Since the university started charging 3 cents per printout, the total number of printouts taken in computer labs has gone down by 70%. Perhaps your univ should try that out as well.

    --

    Face your daemons!

  95. Re:Errr, it won't cut laser toner use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...seeing as a laser printer throws an entire page of black toner at the page, with the charged parts of the paper holding onto it.

    Nope, that's wrong. Laser printers work by firing a laser in the pattern desired at a charged photoreceptor, which is then brushed with toner, and over which the paper rolls. The image is thus transferred, and the paper is heated to melt and fuse the toner, which would otherwise remain a fine dust.

    Excess toner in the brushing stage is recycled.

  96. Re:The obligatory line: If the bibles are printed by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    in this font will they be even HOLEIER?

    Will sermons be read from HOLIER SCRIPTURES?

    If a junior/new priest reads from book at the altar, should the hail be "HOLEY HOLEY HOLEY LORD..."

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  97. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holey shit.

  98. Why not survey existing fonts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to do a rigorous survey of available fonts, plotting print-readability against ink-use. Then encumber the best fonts with a costly license!

  99. WTF, just set the printer driver to draft mode. by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Just set the printer driver to save ink. Almost all of them have that option now. The output is a little lighter (as would the version with holes be as well).

    Now you can save money AND get your print out put to look the way you want.

    Progress is amazing!

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  100. Woohoo! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I cal kill 20-25% more trees with one toner cartridge!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  101. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Mad+Dog+Manley · · Score: 1

    But we're using it at a faster pace than it can be renewed.

    No, in fact forestation rates have been on the rise in North America for over 100 years. Wood use is a sustainable industry and I'm surprised the environmental movement has not been on board.

  102. They're a marcomms company: this is a stunt by gilgongo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sigh. As the various outraged typographers here attest, this is a self-promotional stunt and has nothing to do with innovation or even typography. The clue is the first line of TFA:

    "Dutch marketing and communications company Spranq has come up with a novel and free way of slashing printer ink costs by developing a font with holes in it."

    I work for a marcomms agency as well. This is how such agencies get clients: you pull stunts like this to make yourselves look like gurus in some way, so when you go in for pitches you have lots of press clippings (clients don't read them, they just look at where they were published) so you have some kind of differentiation over your rivals. I worked for a place where we made a big fanfare about recruiting an "artist in residence" (and got lots of press) - others in our space have launched "labs" or various kinds, etc. etc.

    There's no substance in any of it. It's all just a marketing con-job and sad to say Slashdot has fallen for it (not that a marcomms agency's clients would be interested in a /. story anyway).

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:They're a marcomms company: this is a stunt by Benanov · · Score: 1

      and it's a GPL violation.

    2. Re:They're a marcomms company: this is a stunt by BillX · · Score: 1

      "Dutch marketing and communications company Spranq has come up with

      Their name ends with a 'q', that should have been everyone's first clue.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  103. Ah, the irony by condour75 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Clearly this is one of those "let's-get-some-free-press" stories. How much extra ink will be used printing this story on page D-5 of every local newspaper's wacky news section?

  104. They did try that... by Animaether · · Score: 1

    ...obviously they ruled that out as that just wouldn't be very newsworthy at all, now would it?

    "Behind Ecofont

    [...] We tried lots of possible ink-saving-options. From extra thin letters to letters with outlines only.[/quote]

    I agree that there's better ways to save ink, especially ways that apply to any font (put those halftone patterns to good use, for example), but it's a fun font to add to the collection if nothing else; if nothing else, we should applaud the fact that it's free (as in etc. - quite unlike the fonts you linked to, I might add)

  105. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by pipatron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, as people have pointed out before, this is just a lame marketing trick from an unknown ad company, since you can just use any thinner font and get the same readability with even less ink.

    For the marketing trick to work, of course they need to spam their name.

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  106. As a former type designer by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An easier way to save ink AND paper is this: use a sans serif font that has 1/2 the stroke weight and print multipage documents at a smaller size. If the stroke thickness is normally, say, 150 units, make it something like 80. Use a large X height to add to readability. Then print at 10pt instead of 12. Massive savings, and no need to resort to swiss cheese fonts which will look like crapola over 12 pt. Word.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  107. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by grumbel · · Score: 1

    That might be true, but if you recycle the paper instead of dumping it in the landfill you would have that CO2 that is trapped in the paper left out in the air.

  108. Re:Bell Centennial (phonebook font) had holes in 1 by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    Those weren't "holes" they're called "ink traps" and they are more like wedges cut at the peak of negative angles. Ink naturally blots a tiny bit, especially at smaller sizes, so using the ink traps didn't save ink, it merely allowed for sharp angles (such as found in M or W) to print correctly at small sizes.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  109. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because ADOBE is the company you want to emulate to not piss people off....

    *GeminiDomino posting AC since I'm on an ubuntu livecd without passwordmaker.

  110. Save both ink AND paper... by heretic108 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A bt f cre8v splng cn sv bth ink & papr. Thez 2 sntncs hv svd 31% f bth.

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    1. Re:Save both ink AND paper... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      A bt f cre8v splng cn sv bth ink & papr.

      ...but use up a catastrophic number of brain cycles attempting to parse it.

    2. Re:Save both ink AND paper... by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      Who modded this troll? I know there isn't a -1 Not Funny but it was obviously an attempt at humor. Let me translate:

      "A bit of creative spelling can save both ink and paper. These two sentences have saved 31% of both."

      Oh yes, that most definitely is a Troll. [/sarcasm]

    3. Re:Save both ink AND paper... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      As I'm pretty sure nobody thought your comment was funny enough to print out and tack to their wall, your comment saved neither.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:Save both ink AND paper... by lewko · · Score: 1

      And try to use the letter O a lot.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    5. Re:Save both ink AND paper... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Translation for the humorless:

      "A bit of creative spelling can save both ink and paper. These two sentences have saved 31% of both."

      (I've subsequently purchased carbon credits to offset the extra ink and paper I may be using if someone prints out this page.)

  111. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Funny

    Save the Earth!

    Cut holes in the 20% of heads of Oil Company Executives, Bankers and Presidents!

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  112. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    ...which really sucks when they're French...

  113. eco friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well is eco friendly because it is made from an recycled font....

  114. donations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to set up a donations page: linking to dutch paypal locale..

  115. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by RobDude · · Score: 1

    If I backup my software documents along with the software applications that read them - problem solved.

    All I need then is a computer or emulator that can run whatever os is required by the system.

    Not a problem as far as I'm concerned.

  116. Duh by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

    To be able to pierce holes in the font, they had to thicken it by making it bold, hence use more ink. This just defeats the whole purpose. Really stupid!

  117. And The Little Birdy Says, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheep Cheep Cheep ASS!

  118. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Vectronic · · Score: 1

    [Citation Needed]

    But besides, even if it is on the rise in "North America"... that doesn't mean the (deforestation) rate has decreased elsewhere in the world, and for the most part, its elsewhere in the world that has the really important (scale/density/etc) forests.

  119. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

    Oh...I just looked at the name of the file I downloaded, noted the company name, and found the font....although I've wasted immense amounts of time on simpler things than that...

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  120. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by jadedoto · · Score: 1

    Why do you think I bought my eeepc?

  121. Paper consumption is declining by Animats · · Score: 1

    Paper consumption peaked a few years ago and is now declining. As the old paper-oriented people retire and die off, demand for paper decreases. Young people are more likely to upload a photo to Flickr than print it on an inkjet.

    Besides, if you're printing text, get something with a xerographic engine, a laser or LED printer. Toner is cheap.

  122. EASY by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    black is the new president

    *whistles as his karma goes to hell*

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  123. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    If you recycle it you end up with carbon free paper, and the carbon goes in the air?

    I don't think so.

    If you put it in the trash and it get burnt sure, but not if it's recycled.

  124. Re:What a f---ing stupid idea! by pruss · · Score: 1

    How about reducing the font size by 10.5%?

  125. offload the environmental impact to the CPU by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, now that the fonts require more complex spline sets and fill patterns to create, the processor controlling the printer is going to have to work harder, which means more electricity will be drawn, which means the coal-burning power plant will have to stay open an hour longer...

  126. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by LunarCrisis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Whoever modded that "troll" should read this.

    --
    Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
    Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
  127. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by adisakp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    20% less sodium by volume: Your Mom should try Kosher Salt Flakes. They're like salt flavored snowflakes (which fluffs up the volume) and they tend to stick to the outside of food easily so you get a salty "taste" with less (by mass) salt.

  128. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by biocute · · Score: 4, Funny

    f u cn rd ths u cn

    I blushed when I read this: "fxxx xxu cxnx, rxdx thxs xxu cxnx"

  129. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by mosb1000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Deforestation is almost exclusively the result of agricultural expansion. It makes no sense to say that saving paper = saving forests.

    Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the matter:

    In simple terms deforestation occurs because forested land is not economically viable. Increasing the amount of farmland, wood extraction and, infrastructure expansion are all important factors in driving deforestation in different regions with mining also an important cause. There is considerable interplay between these factors. For example logging(wood extraction) or mining requires roads to transport the timber(infrastructure expansion) and farmers use these roads to move into previously unreachable areas of forest (agricultural expansion). The ultimate cause of most deforestation is increased food production. Cattle, permanent crops, shifting cultivation and colonization are all equally important to global tropical deforestation

    Even when deforestation is the result of lumber harvesting activities, it is primarily because the roads used to access the lumber make it easier for farmers to move in and use the land.

    While forest area is on the decline in the US, it is due to urbanization, not timber harvesting activities (the same article discusses this).

  130. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just color copies/prints cost my midsized employer $200K last year and that didn't include the cost of paper. In this economy that's a real target for cost savings. If you can save 20% that's about enough to employ one low level person or enough to give an extra 1% cost of living adjustment to a department. As long as the results are legible on a marginal printer is there any reason NOT to do it?

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  131. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's easy to buy for for Christmas presents; I go to Goodwill and get empty bottles of high-price perfume, fill them with isopropyl alcohol, and give them to her as the real stuff. She can't tell that it isn't.

    Well aren't you a nice chap.

    She is a "low sodium" believer. She salts nothing at all, and has a shaker on the table for those who want some taste in their food.

    Don't knock it until you try it. Go low-salt for a couple of months then eat a meal at a Chinese restaurant. You won't be able to taste anything but salt and you'll feel so thirsty that you'll think you've crawled through the Saharah.

  132. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've seen multiple presentations by naturalists specifically calling out the fact that North America is significantly more forested than it was before European settlers came. One big factor is the wholesale clearing of much of the great plains.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  133. Printing cost by rml1997 · · Score: 1

    Over the lifetime of the printer, the transistors will have to switch much more often, causing them to fail sooner and to use more power. Think of the children!!!

  134. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    In our University, printing used to be free until 2 years ago. Since the university started charging 3 cents per printout, the total number of printouts taken in computer labs has gone down by 70%. Perhaps your univ should try that out as well.

    That's fair, but only as long as professors are required to take every assignment in a digital form. The moment there's a class that requires a printed copy of a report, that printing better be included with the price for taking the class.

  135. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a salt solution sprayed on your food. You get a much lower concentration in your food but the same flavour.

  136. Get a laser printer by fluch · · Score: 1

    Get a laser printer. That saves most.
    I got a year ago an used HP LaserJet 2300dn with 87% of cardige left. 49 Pounds, incl. shiping. Should altogether print about 6700 pages. Which ink printer can compete with this. I will make my PhD without refilling it for sure in the next 2 years...

    1. Re:Get a laser printer by Helmholtz · · Score: 1

      "...without refilling it for sure in the next 2 years..."

      Or until the little microchip inside the toner cartridge decides that you need a new one, regardless of how much toner is left.

      --
      RFC2119
  137. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by BooRolla · · Score: 1

    She's easy to buy for for Christmas presents; I go to Goodwill and get empty bottles of high-price perfume, fill them with isopropyl alcohol, and give them to her as the real stuff. She can't tell that it isn't.)

    You seriously do this? That's just awful

  138. Re:+1 PARENT. Saves paper too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1h 51min not bad reaction time...

  139. title title by z-j-y · · Score: 1

    what's the different between an emo and an eco?
    an eco uses less ink; otherwise they are the same.

  140. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's based on a GPL typeface, right? One could just open the typeface in a "font"[sic] editor and save it with a new name.

  141. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by mataap · · Score: 1

    Use a2ps or fineprint to reduce paper and ink usage. Lots of controls to manage multi page printing, duplex, rejecting dud pages before printing, blocking graphics etc.

  142. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggested we should charge people by the number of pages not picked up at the end of the month. My suggestion was quickly shot down. I'll never make it into management.

    It was probably shot down because it was ridiculous, and almost certainly unenforceable assuming the prints were done for something even remotely work related.

    What you should have suggested, and still should suggest if you're still having the problem, is to track and bill ALL printing costs to the department/project responsible and force them to budget for it.

  143. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by kimvette · · Score: 2, Informative

    On that note, check out their license page:

    The inventive designing method of the Ecofont - ommitting spaces in each
    letter to decrease the black surface of the letter and thus save ink by printing - is intellectual
    property of SPRANQ creative communications, Utecht, The Netherlands. Imitation of this technique
    is prohibited.

    They pretty much fucked their own limitation over by releasing this under GPL (which they had to do, starting out with a GPL typeface to begin with). By releasing under the GPL they cannot place such restrictions on use, forking, renaming, imitating, etc. by definition. You can do what you want with this, so long as it remains GPL.

    In summary: imitate at will, per the license they released this under.

    On a completely unrelated note: since this is obviously just a "green" publicity stunt, where are the "donations" going?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  144. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Nikker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not really the idea of the holes it's just coming up with another way to give less ink / toner from the cartridge. These guys want to stop and go with the usage giving you 100% black / color with small 0% black spots all over it. This is the extreme idea but can also be solved by lowering the black from 100% all the time to about 80% and have a clean looking image / text printout which would likely be more pleasing on the eyes.

    Even evaluating different brightness values of the paper you buy will increase contrast and likely lower your acceptable black level for increased savings.

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  145. another foolish idea by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    We could just switch to Dutch, then we can all spell 'the' as 'de' and save heaps of letters!

  146. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by windsurfer619 · · Score: 1

    URW? MS? A lot do...

  147. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by AvitarX · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because students are never required to spend extra money on projects.

    My wife only printed 3000 pages in a year of her Master in French Literature. This is all drafts ect, not just final turn in.

    The cost would only be $90.00

    Compared to the cost of a single credit hour at even a cheap college or university it is not really all that much.

    your talking about $3-$6 in a class that costs hundreds or more.

    Additionally I assure graphic designers are required to get non-free work done at printers. And a lot of other classes may not have strictly required purchases, but damned close to it.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  148. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lipton Chicken Noodle soup comes in two varieties. One makes 4 cups of soup, and the other (advertising 33% less sodium) makes 3 cups.

    Companies do this all the time :/

  149. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by tzanger · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight. You buy empty perfume bottles and fill them with isoprop, giving them to your mom as gifts, since she can't tell the difference anyway?

    Why not give her something she'd actually get some use out of, instead of playing to her weakness? I'm sure that if she wanted isoprop, she'd apply it without the trickery.

  150. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    By recycling it instead it gets transported two or three times as much as recycled paper, leaving a larger carbon footprint and the toxic chemicals used to wash off the ink need disposing.

  151. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice font though.

    Did you look at the font?

    It looks like your printer is out of toner ;-)

  152. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    That should read "gets transported two or three times more then non-recycled paper".

  153. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if it's burned, if you bury it then it's trapped underground.

    Recycled paper needs to be transported more times, two to three trips and the toxic chemicals used to wash off the ink need disposing too.

    It's a complete waste of time and leaves a bigger carbon footprint.

  154. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by Obfuscant · · Score: 2
    Why not give her something she'd actually get some use out of, instead of playing to her weakness? I'm sure that if she wanted isoprop, she'd apply it without the trickery.

    Because she thinks that I'm giving her something expensive and nice and it costs me almost nothing. Buying her stuff she could use might actually cost some real dough.

    Yes, if she wanted to apply isopropyl alcohol she'd do it herself.

    No, I don't really do this. As a gag one year I bought a large bottle of ipa and pasted on a fake Chanel No. 5 label. She thought it was funny.

  155. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by ChangelingJane · · Score: 1

    Me too. Txt-speak sure isn't lossless compression.

  156. Totally useless by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

    but probably not very practical.

    That's an understatement. I just installed this things and was extremely unimpressed.

    Anyone here remember those old dot matrix ribbon printers from the 80's and early 90's? Remember how bad their print quality was? Well, with this font, you can enjoy that same level of quality on your screen as well as your printout!

    So yeah, unless you are a glutton for ribbon printer nostalgia, this thing is terrible.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    1. Re:Totally useless by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Anyone here remember those old dot matrix ribbon printers from the 80's and early 90's? Remember how bad their print quality was?

      Actually, I thought their print quality was pretty good. Of course, after a few thousand pages it tended to fade out -- but ribbons are very cheap. We used these in our office for printing mostly invoices and accounting reports. Cheaper than laser, much cheaper than inkjet, and the ink is permanent and waterproof, doesn't dry up and clog like inkjets. But slow and noisy.

      Most dot matrices have a "letter quality" mode, which printed at higher resolution. However, if you were using Windows, it converts a page to an image and print it as a giant bitmap, using Windows Truetype fonts which did look crappy at dot matrix resolution, and taking much, much longer than using the printer fonts. DOS programs with their own printer drivers were much more suitable, (I used Word 5 -- Microsoft offers it as a free download) though there are Windows workarounds (eg, FTprint.

      But for my personal use (as I do DTP and graphics) now I have a HP Laserjet.

  157. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by ChangelingJane · · Score: 1

    If you want to get technical, "Garamond" is a more generic moniker given to a group of typefaces made by many different companies. Adobe attaches their name to it because it's specifically their version of it. But when you've created a unique typeface with a unique name, it's kind of pointless to brand it.

  158. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Surt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I find I have to print like 500X over to make the ink raised enough for a braille reader. On the plus side, they don't know they have inky fingers.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  159. Alternative solution: EverGreen by belg4mit · · Score: 1
    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
    1. Re:Alternative solution: EverGreen by Dutchmang · · Score: 1

      Wow that font looks like ass. I went there hoping for a positive reaction, but are they serious?

      --
      I'm looking over the wall, and they're looking at me!
    2. Re:Alternative solution: EverGreen by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the lightbox? It's not bad at larger sizes, but it is illegible at 12 points.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  160. Flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, well "you're" grammar is flawed.

  161. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by TornCityVenz · · Score: 1

    It's called Economode on HP printers, it uses less toner on every page printed through the printer. Similar settings are also available on most other printers. Although to be honest I never see anyone using this, unless it's as a trouble call that something is wrong with the printer.

    --
    I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
  162. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by qw0ntum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, but paper production is also a very energy intensive process, and the byproducts of production are fairly polluting. Just because it is "renewable" doesn't mean using it can be done without limits. There is more to the equation than just "we can grow more of the primary raw material", there is an environmental, social, and economic balance that has to be considered.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
  163. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Skrapion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, the idea that everything required for the class should be included in the price of the class is ridiculous. Books aren't included. Neither are pens, paper, or laptops.

    Second, what difference does it make whether you pay for your printing at the printer or in your tuition? Theoretically speaking, if nobody abused their printing privileges, the cost would average out and the cost to you would be the same either way.

    However, if charging three cents at the printer reduces abuse, then you, as a student, actually save money. Even if you're one of the students that's abusing your printing privileges, you'd still save money because you don't have to pay for all the other students that are abusing their privileges. Putting all the cost in the tuition causes the tragedy of the commons.

    My college actually charged nine cents per page; it was really no big deal. Although I'm curious if the GP meant three cents per page, or three cents per job. If it's per page, the 70% drop doesn't surprise me too much, but if it's per job, then that's pretty amazing.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  164. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Krishnoid · · Score: 1
    At our company, decision came from on high as part of a 'green initiative' to turn off cover page generation. I used to be able to identify uncollected printouts and stick them in the appropriate mailboxes -- now they just sit near the printer because you can't tell who printed what, and eventually they end up in the recycling bin without anyone having read them.

    Maybe you'd have better luck if you had the head of the hip new green initiative at your company repackage your suggestion as part of a longer list; since they have a mandate from management, they might have better luck with it.

  165. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Surt · · Score: 1

    There is a reasonable goal, though, of offering up front pricing to your students. There are many students on tight budgets for whom an extra $100 in printing costs that come as a surprise may mean dropping the class.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  166. Why the quotes around 'Albert Hall'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, can someone explain why someone would think it necessary or even grammatically permissible to put quotes around a proper name?

    People use quotation marks in ways that make me smirk, then sigh, then become flummoxed. Am I the only one? Is there a method to the madness?

    1. Re:Why the quotes around 'Albert Hall'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in this example it's not meant as a place, but a string to be printed with the font being discussed (and if you looked at TFA, full of holes). Obviously the joke went way over your head.

    2. Re:Why the quotes around 'Albert Hall'? by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      Quotes mark, ehm, a quote. You know, something someone else said, or usually says. Rhetorically it's also a way to distance yourself from their way of putting it. Or they can be used to express irony! "Albert Hall" is code for something nasty I suspect.

    3. Re:Why the quotes around 'Albert Hall'? by HBI · · Score: 1

      It's a reference to the Royal Albert Hall.

      It has about the same relevance as saying how many Libraries of Congress would be filled, though.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  167. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Skrapion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mod parent interesting, insightful, and informative.

    It seems counter-intuitive, but if we stopped using wood completely, then forested land would no longer be profitable! If that happened, people would just replace the forested land with something that is profitable, like housing developments or farms.

    I agree that deforestation is a big problem, particularly in third-world countries, but reducing paper use could reduce reforestation, which would cause more harm than good.

    I think it's more important that we focus on passing laws to protect natural habitats; when forced to, logging companies have no problems making the most with the land they own.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  168. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Skrapion · · Score: 1

    I think you're confused about the difference between recycling and renewable resources.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  169. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Tokerat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who the fuck prints out their entire inbox? If that is happening, the problem isn't deforestation, it's wasteful morons.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  170. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I probably wasn't clear, but the $90 (3000 pages at .03/page) was over 12 months of printing for the both of us (I probably printed under 150 pages though). This was not just the final prints, but every draft the was marked up and reviewed, sometimes 2 or 3 a night. I got this number by printing a total life-time page when the toner ran out after a year of ownership (probably a month into the second year of classes actually).

    I know that expenses can be tight, but $10/month is a very minor cost of college, and even the most desperate of students can probably come up with it. If not then they are struggling so much every day that it will probably not be what puts them over the top.

    As long as it is not coin-op where it needs to be paid at the moment I think it would be fine.

    Besides, if printing went down 70% I bet it reduced the cost of computer lab fees (or kept them down) tacked onto tuition as a separate line item. In that sense everybody wins (financially), because the cost of printing supplies just went down for every student.

    Students are often expected to purchase and turn-in workbooks that cost $15-$30, this a budget tech college, if students can be expected to spend $15 on a workbook they find out about after the fact, can't they be expected to pay $6 for a couple drafts of a 30 page report, and some other stuff?

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  171. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

    All this font accomplishes at smaller sizes (at which the holes are less than 2 pixels wide) is to cause the printed document to come out in grey instead of black. You could save more ink, and get more consistent results, by just changing all of your black text to 75% grey.

  172. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Post script is 24 years old, I bet PDF keeps a similar track record.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  173. Potentially not good for OCR by drfreak · · Score: 1

    We scan claim forms at my work and the Dot Matrix print is the hardest on OCR. If it is just for reading though, it is a great idea. The human brain is good at filling in blank spots.

    1. Re:Potentially not good for OCR by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      sounds like your OCR is a bit lame if it can't read a bunch of fixed-width completely invariant characters.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:Potentially not good for OCR by alienw · · Score: 1

      What makes you think dot-matrix printers are either fixed-width or invariant? This isn't 1978. Most dot-matrix printers support a large variety of fonts.

    3. Re:Potentially not good for OCR by Casandro · · Score: 1

      Uhm, most dot-matrix printers are left running at their default font for their entire life. Sure they could do a lot more, but for filling out a form it's more than enought.

  174. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    Get a laser printer. Way cheaper to operate.

    --
    this is my sig
  175. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by von_rick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm curious if the GP meant three cents per page, or three cents per job. If it's per page, the 70% drop doesn't surprise me too much, but if it's per job, then that's pretty amazing.

    The cost is 3c/page. Its not surprising at all. Just the fact that printing out a Dilbert cartoon to put on their corkboard would now cost them money, keeps people from printing things that aren't essential.

    --

    Face your daemons!

  176. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Skrapion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They pretty much fucked their own limitation over by releasing this under GPL (which they had to do, starting out with a GPL typeface to begin with).

    Actually, Bitstream Vera isn't GPL and has no copy-left clauses.

    The clause that you pointed out in Spranq's license is rather questionable, though. It makes it sound like they own a design patent on the font. That would also allow them to control derivative works, even if Bistream Vera was released under the GPL (v.2 or earlier).

    I couldn't find anything that supported the patent theory, though. If it's true, that would certainly sour their slashvertisement. If it's false, then I'm pretty sure their patent is unenforceable, since you don't actually need to use the font to emulate its design.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  177. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Skrapion · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how printing on both sides of the paper saves on ink.

    Besides, printing on both sides of the paper is a pretty big hassle. If your printer errantly grabs two sheets of paper in the middle of your job, you're pretty much screwed.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  178. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by residieu · · Score: 1

    As long as the class requires you to pay for your own books, notebooks and pens, I think even the poorest student can afford to pay $1 to print a 30 page report.

    I even had a teacher who made us buy way overpriced "blue books" (A cover made of blue paper with sheets of standard lined notebook paper stapled inside) to take our tests in. I didn't object to the cost as much as the idea that the rest of my notebook paper wasn't good enough for him

  179. Ink/toner costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When I was 23 and naive, I took a job as the sysadmin for a large high school. Like an idiot, I formed a technology committee of one person from each academic department to advise me. The math department head spent multiple meetings talking her head off against laser printers. Her arguments:

    - Inkjet cartridges cost only $25 each, and I was pushing laser printers that needed $70 toner cartridges.

    - Laser printer toner page yields are "your mileage may vary", so the 4000-page estimate from HP isn't accurate.

  180. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GeminiDomino posting AC since I'm on an ubuntu livecd without passwordmaker.

    Who GIVES a shit? Do you think you are FAMOUS or something? Wow.

  181. Dutch sentences tend to be longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I am actually Dutch and I'm sad to say that on average sentences in my native language are longer than sentences in English, although usually only slightly so.
    Wel, ik ben daadwerkelijk een Nederlander en het spijt me te zeggen dat zinnen in mijn moedertaal gemiddeld langer zijn dan zinnen in het Engels, hoewel doorgaans slechts een klein beetje.

    (However, Dutch spelling has other huge benefits over English spelling. Although unless the government doesn't pussy out on the next spelling reform like they did last time, we will be overtaken by the French and Germans when it comes to quality as well as quantity. If that hasn't already happened.)

  182. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read it again, I had already made a post for saving on ink/toner, this one was for other things, although A5 works for ink to if you print at half size.

    If it prints on one side and then on the other would picking up two papers really be such a big deal? Just print those 2 pages again? Also a decent printer shouldn't pick up two papers in the first place should it?

  183. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our case, our university tracked each student's print amount and you could buy more pages at 5 cents per page.

    But each course you took at university credited you with a certain quota for that paper.

    (So, a course might give you 100 pages. Beyond that, you had to buy more.)

  184. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    that, and we have these vast tracts of land we refer to as national parks, where we vehemently prevent natural burn offs, that naturally cull forests. I'm not saying that finding an economical, non-petroleum based alternative to harvesting billions of trees to make paper and houses is a bad thing, but i swear to you, the day we actually find an easier, cheeper, faster way to build a house or write a note, we'll switch. (and don't say concrete. concrete is expensive, and a pain in the @$$ to build with in residential terms)

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  185. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    and trees harvest themselves and walk to paper the factory?
    and trashed paper walks to the landfill?
    and making paper from tree takes less energy than recycling it?

    I do not have any hard number on this but I'm really not sure recycling paper is more wastful then trashing it.

  186. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    I hate to break it to you, but in this day and age, at least in the US, not one person is clearcutting forested land to grow corn or raise beef cattle. contrary to popular opinion, cattle do not require open, treeless land to grow. amazingly enough, they fare extremely well in forested areas, mountains, deserts, and other seemingly "non cow" locations. If you grow corn, you don't look at forested land, you look at land that is not going to cost you a fortune and a half to remove the trees from, remove the tree stumps from, remove the inevitable boulders that go with trees and stumps, Level the land, and *then* grow corn. you buy flat clear land in the midwest, where they grow corn already, and you grow corn. more tree cutting damage comes from the oil industry than the cattle and corn industries combined.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  187. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Tatsh · · Score: 1

    Yeah seriously. Who the hell buys inkjet printers? You can get a decent LaserJet for just a little bit more now. People have these inkjet printers because they come free with computers so often. Greatest scheme ever: give the printer and half-filled cartridges for free, over-price new cartridges!

  188. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Skrapion · · Score: 1

    If it prints on one side and then on the other would picking up two papers really be such a big deal? Just print those 2 pages again? Also a decent printer shouldn't pick up two papers in the first place should it?

    I'm not sure if you're suggesting something different, like using one of those expensive printers with printing heads on both sides of the page, but usually to print on both sides of the paper you first print all the even-numbered pages in reverse order, then put them back in the printer tray (and double-check that you have them in the right way around!) and print all the odd-numbered pages. So if you print the even-numbered pages and get:

    8, 6, blank, 4, 2

    And then it prints the even pages flawlessly, you end up with your pages in this order (grouped by physical pages):

    (1, 2), (3, 4), (5, blank), (7, 6), (9, 8)

    Assuming this problem only occurred once, you can just flip every page after the fifth page to get the right order, but you still have this blank page in the middle. So if you actually care about how competent you look when you pass this document off to somebody else, you have to re-print everything from page 5 onward.

    This might not be a problem on high-end printers, but I think you'll find that mid-range and low-end printers are far more common.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  189. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fail. This font offers standard-to-low readability and low ink usage. Your "much better" proposal offers low readability with low ink usage. Combine the 2 and you have low readability and really low ink usage. /Who are the retards who mod this shit up?

  190. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

    You just made that up, right? Most paper is made out of trees that are planted to make paper... at least so I'm told, and I have no troubles believing that... the actual problem of course is recklessly cutting down rainforests which need many centuries if not more to become as diverse as they are, not planting trees and cutting them down a few years later... HUGE difference, and saying "every bit helps" makes the issue muddy and therefore actually hurts.

    If anything, one could talk about chemicals used when making paper, or energy consumption.

  191. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Gerald · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...forestation rates have been on the rise in North America for over 100 years.

    What about the rates over the last 200 years? 100 years ago was shortly after the railroads deforested the nation, was it not?

  192. so.... by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    hemp paper? Lots of famous documents were written on it...

  193. Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by zymano · · Score: 1

    Obama should do something about it.

    We need alternatives or the patents need to be busted. It's a joke we can't make cloned cartridges.

    How the hell do they get away with that?

    Ink cartridge filled with ink only costs a dollar to the manufacturers.

    1. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by alienw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Guess what: EVERYTHING you buy costs a fraction of its price to manufacture. If you don't like the price of inkjet printer cartridges, you are free to not buy inkjet printers. Printer manufacturers have found that people prefer buying cheap printers to buying expensive printers with cheap cartridges.

      If you don't like the price of inkjet cartridges, you are more than welcome to buy laser printers, all of which are far cheaper to operate than inkjets. You can buy a laser printer for 50 bucks these days. Just stop whining and demanding government handouts, it's getting a little out of hand.

    2. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by sowth · · Score: 1

      It's taking advantage of people who don't have technical knowledge about the subject. I suppose the IT sector loves to do this, but in most fields it is frowned upon...at least in professional circles. What would you think if, say, a doctor did this?

      Anyway, I am in the market for a cheap printer. What would be the best $50 laser printer for a Linux user? I've seen them around, but I am not sure which one to buy.

    3. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like the price of inkjet cartridge...

      Continuous Ink Supply systems FTW!

      Seriously, this is the way to go if you like ink jets.

    4. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The printers by Samsung reportedly all work well with Linux.

      In addition, you can easily buy nice HP printers used, from business environments, on Ebay for $50-100. Look for the LaserJet 2100, 2200, and 2300 models. These printers are rated for 50,000 pages per month, far more than typical consumer printers. It's easy to find models with less than 10,000 pages on them.

    5. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by alienw · · Score: 1

      Brother makes very good laser printers. Get one with an Ethernet interface, then you can just print to it directly, using Samba. Samsung is another good choice.

    6. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      It looks like we've all gone a bit off topic, but that's OK with me, as the original topic is just Slashdot filler.

      I've been wondering, and it seems like you might know. How well do laser printers work if you don't use them? I mean, ink jet cartridge heads will clog if you don't print something out at least every few weeks, and I hardly ever need to print something. Ink jet heads will clog quickly after they are empty, too. How well would a laser printer handle my situation?

    7. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      It's taking advantage of people who don't have technical knowledge about the subject. I suppose the IT sector loves to do this, but in most fields it is frowned upon...at least in professional circles. What would you think if, say, a doctor did this?

      That's an inaccurate claim. In all fields, including medicine, there are untrustworthy professionals. Doctors will frequently recommend surgery even if it isn't needed. They will prescribe drugs that aren't needed to keep a patient coming back. Pharmaceutical companies will sponsor a doctor's med school education with the requirement that the doctor prescribe their drugs as much as possible, even where something less harsh would do. Mechanics, florists, retail outlets, no industry is immune. There are people in every industry who will rip off their customers given the chance. My guess is that you only singled out IT because IT is something that you are familiar with. Perhaps you would not recognize if a plumber or a landscaper were ripping you off, but that only makes it more likely.

    8. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by sowth · · Score: 1

      So you are saying other doctors would approve of your pharmaceutical whore doctor? You are saying medical review boards would approve of a doctor taking bribes from these companies when it would put his or her patients at risk? I don't think so.

      Yet, in the IT field I am seeing plenty of "professionals" who think it is okay to take advantage of anyone who doesn't understand computers, to the point of selling the shoddiest crap I've ever seen. They've even indoctrinated most users into thinking computers are supposed to be quirky and strange.

      Funny you should mention auto mechanics. In my original post, I was going to compare the IT field with scumbag auto mechanics.

    9. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      So you are saying other doctors would approve of your pharmaceutical whore doctor? You are saying medical review boards would approve of a doctor taking bribes from these companies when it would put his or her patients at risk?

      Nope. I'm saying compare apples to apples. Try to not have such selective observation.

      Yet, in the IT field I am seeing plenty of "professionals" who think it is okay to take advantage of anyone who doesn't understand computers, to the point of selling the shoddiest crap I've ever seen. They've even indoctrinated most users into thinking computers are supposed to be quirky and strange.

      There are bad apples in every profession. Including IT, but not exclusive to it.

    10. Re:Inkjet business = New Microsoft monopoly by alienw · · Score: 1

      They work fine and last pretty much forever. I've used laser printers with 6-year-old toner cartridges, they worked just fine. The toner is just fine plastic powder, it doesn't deteriorate in normal conditions. The laser printer I have right now sees a few pages every month, and seems to be quite happy.

  194. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    What do I expect from the Dutch? I expect cock rings! and dildos! and anal probes! and windmill cookies! and giant lesbians! and drunken soccer fans! and losers carrying flowers upside down by the stems! and wooden shoes! and tiny cars imported from Spain and France! and pot smokers! and whores in the parks! and canals! and birth canals! and motherfucking cobblestone streets! and boats! and weird accents! and Bulgarians on vacation! and Oranjeboom piss! and Yanks no Thanks! and blondes with bad haircuts! and pierced nipples! and leather! and immense faggotry regarding Tin Tin! and Swamp Germans! and bridges! and dykes! and fingers in dykes! and the friggin' North Sea!

    THAT is what I expect from the Dutch.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  195. Other places by phorm · · Score: 1

    I original came from BC, Canada. Lumber is a major market there, and is used both for construction materials and paper (pulp). The trees are re-planted regularly, but it can take quite awhile to regrow a forest.

    The more recent issues arising were that the majority of trees being planted were a certain variety of pine that grew fairly fast and was easy to harvest again in the future.

    Unfortunately, a plague of "pine beetles" hit the province and has been decimating forests, partly due to the fact that these trees were used in such abundance.

    So even replanting has issues if not done correctly. Trees may be replaced, but it's not always quite the same as what was there before.

  196. Pot, kettle by phorm · · Score: 1

    You're accusing the salt companies of being somewhat false in their advertising, but you're giving your mom bottles of isopropyl alcohol instead of perfume? While she might not smell it, I'm guessing that others around her do, and either way one is as false as the other.

    1. Re:Pot, kettle by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      He later said it was a joke, but anyway, isopropyl alcohol evaporates pretty quickly. It's doubtful that anyone would notice it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Pot, kettle by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      You're accusing the salt companies of being somewhat false in their advertising, but you're giving your mom bottles of isopropyl alcohol instead of perfume?

      So you admit that you don't understand the difference between a joke between two family members that costs nobody any money, and deliberate misinformation intended to get people to spend extra money for a product that really is no different than normal?

  197. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by alienw · · Score: 1

    There are classes that involve writing an encyclopedia? At 3 cents a page, $100 is over 3300 pages. I haven't printed that many pages in 4 years of undergrad. Considering that, on average, each class requires about $200 in textbooks (many of which are not even necessary), that's a ludicrous argument.

  198. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by alienw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Have you ever even seen a live cow? It's fairly obvious you've never been on a farm.

  199. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by the_womble · · Score: 1

    the day we actually find an easier, cheeper, faster way to build a house or write a note, we'll switch. (and don't say concrete. concrete is expensive, and a pain in the @$$ to build with in residential terms)

    Bricks? For houses that is, not notes.

    I have found that steel and concrete floors block wifi, so its not all good. I love that fact that it means that the risk of fires is hugely reduced.

  200. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Yay for brick!

  201. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

    Forget the isopropyl. Fill it with ethanol and acetone. That way when she goes out she can be the center of conversation as people gossip behind her back about what a lush she's become.

    --
    Notmysig
  202. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should really upgrade to sticky yellow notes to prevent such disasters in the future.

  203. Publicity Stunt by blackpaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And a remarkably stupid one, though I guess it did get them some attention.

  204. Hemp may cause deforestation by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    I suppose you could argue that using hemp paper leads to deforestation. But we mostly use wood pulp for paper.

  205. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by metamorphage · · Score: 1

    It's not free - it's just included in the IT fees that you pay your school. Most schools have "free" printing to a certain point (X pages per week or per semester), and then pay-per-page after that.

  206. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by reddburn · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's fair, but only as long as professors are required to take every assignment in a digital form. The moment there's a class that requires a printed copy of a report, that printing better be included with the price for taking the class.

    Under "Required Materials" on my syllabus, I always put "a few dollars for printing/copying."

    --
    "Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand" - Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
  207. Simpler solution by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Many Laser printers support a toner save mode in which they automatically reduce your picture to an outline. It would be much simpler to just activate that function.

  208. Paper Not Ink! by cdance · · Score: 1

    I did some calculations for a project I worked on at PaperCut Software. The true environmental cost is not the ink, nor the printer, put the paper. The energy and environmental impact of paper production is scary. It takes 17 Watt hours just to make one sheet, or 8.6g of CO2 per sheet! (see here for details http://www.papercut.com/products/ng/manual/ch-sys-mgmt-environmental-impact.html) Saving the holes in the ink is not going to do much. The real savings are saving paper. For example, many of the schools running our print quota software see a drop in paper by up to 80% over free printing. That's a lot better for the environment that a few empty holes :-)

  209. Great opportunity for steganography by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    It would seem to me that one could slightly modify the locations of the holes in each letter and create a very hard to detect information-carrying channel in your printouts.

    Of course, posting this to the end of a >300 comment Slashdot discussion is in itself a form of stego, but, whatever... <shrugs>

    1. Re:Great opportunity for steganography by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      Of course, posting this to the end of a >300 comment Slashdot discussion is in itself a form of stego, but, whatever...

      Unless of course, like myself, you browse with 'Newest first'.

      --
      - Dan
  210. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go stick your head in a pig!

    MMmmmmm......Bacon.....

  211. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by localman · · Score: 1

    Renewable or not It's still a huge waste of resources to grow trees, cut them down, mill them, ship them, use them, and landfill them (or even recycle them) if you don't actually need to use them in the first place.

    If you do need to use them, fine. But a hell of a lot of what we use today is waste.

    Cheers.

  212. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by LS · · Score: 1

    She has also lost all sense of smell, which is a large component of food taste, so she doesn't notice the lack of salt at all

    Salt doesn't have much, if any, of an aromatic component, so you can definitely taste it even without a sense of smell....

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  213. different printer drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone else been told by the printer driver software that it's time to change the ink cartridges? only when you take it out, you can clearly see around half a cartridge of ink left...

  214. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by afidel · · Score: 1

    All business class printers worth buying do automatic duplexing. Anything lacking duplexing is a consumer toy or someone saving capital costs but wasting consumables and/or employee time.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  215. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also using more paper increases the demand for paper and trees, which will increase the number of trees being planted to make paper.

  216. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by joaobranco · · Score: 1

    Paper trees are always re-planted after being cut down (it would get unsustainable very quickly if this didn't happen) - and generally also have a lot of recycled material in the final product. The tree-cutting damage comes from the food industry clearing the way for beef cows or corn crops.

    True, but not the whole truth. Deforestation to create a new crop is always worse than sustainable forests (even if grown-for-paper), but grown-for-paper forests are usually not sustainable (mono-cultures, weak bio-diversity, usually increased water consumption).

    I am from a country with a LARGE paper production industry, and I've seen first hand the razing of indigenous species to create paper-friendly forests... It wasn't pretty, even if the new forests are denser than before, with more trees, the bio-diversity took a nose-dive.

  217. Burials? by bryan1945 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will some enterprising company use this technique to reduce body size, and therefore casket and grave size, to cut burial costs?

    Or are there some holes in my idea (cha-ching!)

    Wow, that was bad even for me.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  218. print in gray? by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    ... say, a 80% gray... which is btw exactly what the ecofont will appear when considered at real-life sizes instead of their superlarge demo image...

    --
    Herve S.
  219. Confused!?@%*^%! by Latrommi · · Score: 1

    Ok, I must admit, I'm a bit confused. Wouldn't an OUTLINE font be better that one with holes in it?

  220. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Tell you what, when you can come up with a better way to save 20% of the ink used on a printed document, then you can say it's stupid. Until then, I think it's a cleverly simple idea.

    Eliminating the letters e, t, and a would save about 20% of the ink... and you could use any font you want. There. Eco font is stupid.

  221. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by neokushan · · Score: 1

    Not really better, though, is it?

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  222. What do you mean unreadable? by One+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I'm going to use it for the remainder of this post!

    Oooo oooooooo oooooo oooooo ooo oooooooo ooooo oooo oooooooooo

    Ooooo oooooo ooooo oooo ooooo

    --
    www.nodicerpg.com - Some RP stuff for free, some not so for free, but still cheap.
  223. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    Yes it uses more energy to recycle paper and harms the environment.

    If we're talking about aluminium cans then you'd be correct because they take much less energy to recycle.

  224. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    A plantation is not a forest or jungle - very big difference.

  225. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, if charging three cents at the printer reduces abuse, then you, as a student, actually save money. Even if you're one of the students that's abusing your printing privileges, you'd still save money because you don't have to pay for all the other students that are abusing their privileges. Putting all the cost in the tuition causes the tragedy of the commons.

    This is flat out false, for the simple reason that tuition costs are not going to go down because printing isn't included anymore. In reality, this kind of thing works as follows:

    1) Printing (or whatever) is not included in your tuition (or whatever) costs, but rather costs extra.

    2) Printing will be covered by your tuition costs from now on so you won't have to pay extra for it anymore. In order to compensate for this, we're going to raise tuition costs by $AMOUNT, which is considerably more than you paid for printing before.

    3) (Time passes) Because people actually dare use the free printing included in tuition, printing will not be covered by tuition anymore; you will have to pay extra for it again, and each page will cost you $SUM, which is much more than the actual costs of printing a page. Tuition will not go down.

    Seriously, it's EXACTLY like an ISP offering you an "unlimited" plan and then complaining if you go over a random secret bandwidth cap and telling you you'll have to pay extra from now on. The only twist is that it's even worse because the ISP will ALSO keep on charging you for your unlimited plan which you can't use anymore now.

  226. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    Most paper will be readable in 30 years. Will your digital documents?

    Yes, as long as I keep maintaining their readability (that applies to paper) they will last. Indefinitely in fact (unlike paper).

    so even if you've still got a medium which is readable (cdroms in 30 years? Probably not...)

    This REALLY isn't hard to solve: Every five to ten years or so, simply copy your document archive to $MEDIUM_OF_THE_DAY$.

  227. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Zapf Dingbats

    --
    bickerdyke
  228. Re:Here's another cleverly simple idea: cookies by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    Low salt intake can cause health problems like low blood pressure (which can cause e.g. tiredness or fainting). You NEED some salt.

  229. Wrote a song about it. by Millennium · · Score: 1

    There's a hole in my letters, dear Liza, dear Liza...

  230. Prnt wth LOLspk by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Just chop out all the vowels and print like it's lolspeak

  231. CPU and printer rendering overhead? = ? $ by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 1

    This font obviously has a lot more vector points than typical fonts so rendering both on PC while working with it and printer when printing must contribute to more CPU usage and as such greater electricity usage. Slow rending time on older laser printers must also maintain the roller/heater parts at print temperatures for longer too. The net results is it *may* waste more $ in electricity than it saves in toner....

  232. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    I grew up on a ranch. where people raise cows in numbers over thousands. Farms are where people grow corn, wheat, and other plants. your stereotypical "farm" where there are 20 cows on the back lot, some pigs, a few sheep, and some chickens? the only people that do that are the arrogant bastards that move out of the city and decide that they have to be "farmers"

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  233. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    which is likely at least partly because the settlers killed off most of the bisons that kept the young trees in check. Bisons, buffalos, cattle, etc all eat young trees preventing grass to become forest. Naturally the trees always win from other vegetation as long as the climate isn't too dry/cold/whatever.

  234. These people don't understand the GPL. by Benanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So didn't anyone read the license?

    That's the best part:

    In the Ecofont the following regulation is enclosed:
    Copyright (C) 2008 SPRANQ creative communications, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    All right reserved. Ecofont is a trademark of SPRANQ creative communications.
    The inventive designing method of the Ecofont - ommitting spaces in each letter to decrease the
    black surface of the letter and thus save ink by printing - is intellectual property of SPRANQ creative
    communications. Imitation of this technique is prohibited.
    The Ecofont is distributed under GPL and based upon Bitstream Vera. The following licence
    paragraph applies...

    And then after the Bitstream Vera requirements...

    To protect the purity of the Ecofont and its communication, the further development of the Ecofont
    and the use of its technique - which includes omitting different shapes in the letters or the use in
    other font types - is only allowed if permission is granted by SPRANQ. A signed licence agreement
    can only be obtained by contacting SPRANQ (www.spranq.eu). SPRANQ is not obliged to grant
    permission. Selling the Ecofont or a variation of it to make a profit is strictly prohibited.

    I do not believe these people understand the GPL. Don't use this font, it's incorrectly licensed.

  235. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems counter-intuitive, but if we stopped using wood completely, then forested land would no longer be profitable! If that happened, people would just replace the forested land with something that is profitable, like housing developments or farms.

    Another more modern alternative is to allow untouched forest land to qualify as a carbon offset in a cap-and-trade system. We would stop using the wood from that forest completely, yet the forest would still have a value and would therefore not be turned into grazing land or houses or what have you (and thus effectively destroyed).

    It is a bit pathetic that we have to assign a value to something to keep it from being destroyed, but at least people are getting awfully clever about assigning values to things...

  236. Re:+1 PARENT. Saves paper too. by Migity · · Score: 1

    What?! Where's the cookie recipe?

  237. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Second, what difference does it make whether you pay for your printing at the printer or in your tuition?

    The difference is that tuition is a single lump sum, paid once per semester, that often isn't "real money" anyway. Often it's loans, or parent's money, or something else that isn't in the front of your consciousness. If it goes up or down, say, $100 to cover the cost of printing for a semester, you aren't even going to notice.

    Paying for printing, however, is something you are confronted with each and every time you print. Over time, this constant reminder trains you to think twice before hitting print. In other words, it makes you take notice and adjust your behavior accordingly.

    In as far as this tends to encourage thought and conservation, I applaud it.

  238. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by cecille · · Score: 1

    Actually, isn't most recycled paper pre-consumer? Like cut ends and thing that wouldn't have ink on them and don't need to be recollected? If you look at the back of recycled paper items they usually list the post-consumer percentage and it's usually in the range of like 1-5%.

    --
    ...no two people are not on fire.
  239. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Migity · · Score: 1

    That's one hell of a lot of "Print Test Pages"

  240. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Migity · · Score: 1

    Hemp paper...the way to go.

  241. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Amouth · · Score: 1

    actualy my wife is currently getting her masters via distance ed. the cost.. 115$ a credit hour.. so 90$ in printing for a 3 hour (345$) class is a 26% cost increase.. now granted it is distance ed so she just uses the home printer.. but not all college's rape the student as bad as most.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  242. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So just decrease the quality even more if you want it to look even worse, big deal? /ali

  243. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Xtravar · · Score: 1

    Brick houses are expensive. Many "brick" homes just have a brick face to make them look fancy & expensive.

    Yes, you can get a brick house. Or a stone house. But that will significantly raise the price, so it's more of a luxury option. Plus, all the interior walls are going to be wood anyway.

    Not to mention, the OP said "easier, cheaper, faster". Brick is none of those adjectives compared to wood with vinyl siding.

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  244. Total Cost? by marciot · · Score: 1

    I think its dangerous to simply assume that there is net benefit to the environment of something like this, without considering the total cost of using this font. A font full of holes will be considerably more computationally intensive to render than a solid one, which might keep a computer or a printer out of power saving mode longer, which may ultimately offset the saved ink with wasted electricity. This may or may not be true, but it needs to be considered before making the claim that this is good for the environment. I would argue that setting your printer's darkness setting to 80% would save an equal amount of toner, without the risk of increasing computational cost and energy consumption.

  245. The erector set font by olddotter · · Score: 1

    I installed it and I'm keeping it. It reminds me of Erector sets, and that is good enough reason to hold onto 250k of data.

  246. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    My college charged $.05 per page for B&W and $.10 per page for colour (single or double-sided cost the same amount per sheet of paper, if the printer was capable of duplexing). We got a weekly allowance equivalent to 300 pages of B&W, IIRC (use it or lose it, of course). I think that was a fair compromise... your tuition/lab fees did pay for the supplies involved in using the printers, but the limit was there to remind people that their tuition went only so far toward paper/toner and if they went nuts with the printers and used more than their fair share they would be charged extra.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  247. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by RussellSHarris · · Score: 1

    Sure... just send an e-mail to subscribe@newsletter.org and in the subject line please indicate your preference of "plain text", "HTML", or "PDF".

  248. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    You just need the appropriate archaic hardware/software capable of reading them.

    As long as I can run the current version of OO.o (either natively or emulated), I'll be able to open my old Word documents. As long as I can run Adobe Reader, I'll be able to open my old PDF files.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  249. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    It was probably shot down because it was ridiculous, and almost certainly unenforceable assuming the prints were done for something even remotely work related.

    Why? If something was never picked up, it was obviously unnecessary. There shouldn't be a free pass given for wasting company resources just because the pages had something work-related on them... if I want to print 500 copies of yesterday's balance sheet and drop them straight into my wastecan, it shouldn't be tolerated.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  250. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Geez. If the filename didn't tip you off, you could have always double-clicked it and the TTF viewer would have told you the font name.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  251. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    If the fonts are sent to the printer as vector shapes, the printer can do that natively. Some laser printers have this feature in the advanced print setup options. My parents' printer does.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  252. Why Holes? by firmamentalfalcon · · Score: 1

    When you look at a hole, what do you see? Whatever's behind it!

    I assume they measure readability by putting the piece of paper on a white surface and see if it is still readable.

    If it is still readable, then why in the world are they using holes? Instead of using holes, just don't put ink where the holes are. They found a way of minimize the ink needed to print a letter. I imagine it would be be like courier new or some font like that, without cleartype on.

  253. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Captain+Murdock · · Score: 0

    Ha! Yeah right. I go to a huge university (Ohio State) and this is certainly NOT the case. We have papers due in hardcopy format and printing is about 3 cents a page, I believe.

  254. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Bricks? For houses that is, not notes.

    Expensive.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  255. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't that people don't assign value to the forest. The problem is that they assign more value to human life. People act like farmers who move in and clear cut forests have nothing but evil intentions, but nothing could be further from the truth. Many of these people are starving to death, and their only goal is to produce food so that they may go on living.

    In the US and Europe, we have already cut down all the trees necessary to use all the potential farmland. We all have plenty to eat as a result. It is unreasonable to expect people in other countries not to do the same. Who wants to starve to death?

    The environment is important, because it filters our air and our water and provides us with food. Some would argue that it has "intrinsic" value. In my opinion, most of the really beautiful places on earth will remain untouched because they are so inaccessible or they have nothing of value.

    I think it makes sense to safeguard the environment, but I don't think that means it has to remain untouched. If we can use wood from the forest to build houses, and the forest will grow back, we should do so. If we can use oil to build functional, sustainable infrastructure we should do so. If we can build dams to get water for agriculture, we should do that too. It's okay to make changes to the environment. We're humans and that's what we do. We only need to be careful to make sure we do it in a responsible, sustainable way.

  256. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Why are the 1800's relevant when those practices have largely ceased? We're on an upward trend.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  257. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by techess · · Score: 1

    Here are a couple cheap and easy ways to get rid of forest for farmland.

    If it is old growth call a company that wants to harvest it for lumber. Make it a requirement that they remove the stumps. Depending on the economy with that requirement at worst you'll pay nothing for them to take the trees. If wood is at a premium or if you have really nice growth or hardwoods you'll make a profit. Not every lumber company would be willing to make that deal but some are. Especially the guys who cut it into boards on site.

    If the trees are junk fast growth trees you slash and burn. Cheap & easy. I don't live in a dry state so in my area you don't even need to get a permit for this. You just call and leave a message on the machine of the local volunteer fired department. Girdle the trees in late summer/fall and burn in the spring and you are ready for early planting. You probably won't even need to fertilize the first couple of years.

    As for stones and boulders if you farm in a "glacier state" you are already used to growing boulders and rocks and it is just part of life. You take your rock picker or rock rake you and clear them. Heck you can even sell the rocks to landscapers or the public.

    I'll agree though that farming and ranching isn't what is the biggest threat to the forests. According to US Forest Services the biggest threat to the forests (at least in 2005 when it was written) is urban development. U.S. Department of Agriculture "Forests on the Edge - Housing Development on America's Private Forests" (2005) http://www.fs.fed.us/projects/fote/reports/fote-6-9-05.pdf An interesting side note and more applicable to question of paper use, it looks like the Forest Service is researching urban tree utilization for wood and paper products.

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers. They *hate* that.
  258. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Eliminating the letters e, t, and a would save about 20% of the ink...

    What would you call that... cofon?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  259. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what do we expect from Profane MuthaFucka? ... oh nevermind.

  260. 20% less words works just as well by SrWebDeveloper · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just have everyone use 20% less words in their documents, that works too, i.e.:

    MEMORANDUM

    Date: July 1, 200
    To: Harold Sr.
    : Isabel
    Subject: for Payroll Advances

    There is new procedure (to reflect) for obtaining payroll advances. I believe will find it improvement over the old, confusing. The new is as:

    1. Obtain special Form number, Request for, from your.
    2. Complete the form in all the blanks in the section of the.
    3. Have your immediate approve your request by signing on the Supervisor.
    4. Take the approved Form the receptionist in the Payroll and, Building Z, Room.

    Thank,

    Hmmm... on second thought... um, maybe not.

  261. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by 7bit · · Score: 1

    I don't know for you but for me 99.9% of the paper I consumed won't be readable in a year, because I will have thrown it away.

    Text-files? I'm sure they will.

    PDF? No idea.

    99.9% of the paper I use won't be readable soon after I flush it.

  262. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Surt · · Score: 1

    I don't know where you print your pages, but my school charged 9c per page, and it would not be uncommon to need to print out 50 page/day to do your work.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  263. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by twilight30 · · Score: 1

    People in legal cases.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  264. Dot-Matrix by badfish2 · · Score: 1

    Sounds more like they switched to a dot-matrix printer. It too has little dots in all of its fonts. It also saves a ton when you're trying to print graphics...

    --
    "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!" - a dog
  265. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by toddestan · · Score: 1

    The thing that bothers me is when colleges require the students to print out worksheets and handouts on their own dime. An industrial photocopier is going to be cheaper and more efficient than having all the students print the stuff out on their own inkjets or even on the lab laser printers. It's more of a way to shift costs to the students (with a significant hike in costs to the student) than anything else.

  266. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the thread.

    it was about $.03/page reducing printing 70%

  267. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Has she ever printed 3000 pages for a single course?

    I was specifically responding to someone that said $.03/page was an unjust fee for students.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  268. The Dutch added the holes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured it would have been the Swiss.

  269. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this different from making the font color gray?

    In the old days, this would have prompted a joke involving Dutch stereotypes of penny pinching. Scots and Jews also shared the stereotype, but it seems now you're only allowed to say that about Indians? Damn political correctness!

  270. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Amouth · · Score: 1

    3k for a class no.. but then she is someone who is happy to read the material online and tries not to kill trees.. but i know people at work that if in the same situation would kill a printer just for the hell of it

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  271. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Surt · · Score: 1

    Read the thread. That wasn't what I was responding to.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  272. All hail to the lobster overlord! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    3 * +5 funny in a row. You must receive the price of most funny lobster on slashdot ;)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  273. Can we say "DRAFT" mode? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Draft mode for the win!

    a duplex printer together with draft mode saves trees too!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  274. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    The all around price is higher (unit, consumables) and people assume it eats toner like an inkjet so they'll be spending $100 every other week for toner instead of $30 for ink. Of course that simply isn't true. I gave my girlfriend's family my old LaserJet IIIp and external print server (I upgraded to a 2100TN/M I got for $5 at the local university surplus sale) because they were buying ink every other week. They didn't believe me when I said the laser toner would last much longer than the inkjet.

    --
    this is my sig
  275. If holes in the lines saves 20% ink... by amanaplanacanalpanam · · Score: 1

    ...how much more ink is saved when using outline format? Granted, it looks like crap on a monitor, at normal reading size.

  276. Oblig. Chappelle quote by billcopc · · Score: 1

    They wear fonts with dick holes in 'em

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  277. Re:What a fucking stupid idea! by jridley · · Score: 1

    Just set the economy mode as default on your printer. Done. Even $70 laser printers and $30 inkjets I've bought for the last 10 years have economy modes, and they'll work with any font and with graphics.

    If you need to print something "nice" just turn it off for that print job.