Yeah... It's weird, the HTML tag around the article does not bear an href attribute. I'm guessting there's no graphical editor, just an HTML source box for posting these articles?
Firefox is an amazing browser that is extensible and everything. I have my Fx installation with several useful plugins. However, when I don't need to use them, Google Chrome loads up in 1 second only, and responds rapidly, much better in actual performance than Firefox.. and really, no one can force you to do anything.
Chrome is fast because it's very simple. Even if the multi-process idea to ported to Firefox, I guess that the plugins we install and the numerous features it has will worsen the performance.
Well it depends on how you're saying it. You could say: "only a led" or pronounce the words as initials, then it would be "only an el ee dee". (Yeah, I don't know how to use those horrible phonetic things in a dictionary)
Exactly the same thing I say whenever I hear more these silly stuff. I might be judgmental when I call this research silly, but all that effort could have been placed somewhere more productive (think humans). But then again, every aspect of science is important. I might not be interested in this but many others would.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah... It's weird, the HTML tag around the article does not bear an href attribute. I'm guessting there's no graphical editor, just an HTML source box for posting these articles?
Euh.. stop trying too hard.
Firefox is an amazing browser that is extensible and everything. I have my Fx installation with several useful plugins. However, when I don't need to use them, Google Chrome loads up in 1 second only, and responds rapidly, much better in actual performance than Firefox.. and really, no one can force you to do anything. Chrome is fast because it's very simple. Even if the multi-process idea to ported to Firefox, I guess that the plugins we install and the numerous features it has will worsen the performance.
Well it depends on how you're saying it. You could say: "only a led" or pronounce the words as initials, then it would be "only an el ee dee". (Yeah, I don't know how to use those horrible phonetic things in a dictionary)
Exactly the same thing I say whenever I hear more these silly stuff. I might be judgmental when I call this research silly, but all that effort could have been placed somewhere more productive (think humans). But then again, every aspect of science is important. I might not be interested in this but many others would.