Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Test Whether Sharks Enjoy Christmas Songs

Scientists plan to test whether sharks enjoy listening to Christmas pop songs, after US research showed fish could recognize melody. Chris Brown, senior marine biologist at the Loch Lomond aquarium, said seasonal music would be played through walkthrough underwater tunnels where they can be heard by dozens of nurse sharks, black-tip reef sharks, and ray species. Experts will then monitor the sharks' reactions to different songs. We'll play everything from Kim Wilde and Mel Smith's Rocking Around the Christmas Tree and Merry Christmas Everybody by Slade to Wham's Last Christmas. We may find they prefer something softer like White Christmas by Bing Crosby," Brown said. Thank you for answering this question science.

142 comments

  1. More appropriate would be by DeadPixels · · Score: 5, Funny

    A "Great" White Christmas.

    1. Re:More appropriate would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Famous holiday shark films.

      Grandma Got Ate By a Great White.

      Silent Bite.

      Rudolph the Red Nosed Reef Shark.

      Santa Claus VS the Great White.

      It's a Wonderful Lifeboat, The Story of the Indianapolis.

      A Christmas Gory.

    2. Re:More appropriate would be by thatshortkid · · Score: 1

      you skated just under the line with that one. only a thin ray of daylight as the margin.

      --
      The IRS is the one organization that you don't want to fuck with. Remember, these are the guys who took down Al Capone.
    3. Re:More appropriate would be by conlaw · · Score: 1

      Whatever it's called, it should be top contender for a Golden Fleece Award. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Fleece_Award

    4. Re:More appropriate would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have already have an idea for the next research project. Now next thing to research is if this will anger the Moslem Sharks.

  2. Watch out! by zobier · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't let them get a hold of any lasers, that could be a bad combination.

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    1. Re:Watch out! by tirefire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you kidding? There would be killer light shows.

    2. Re:Watch out! by PDX · · Score: 1

      They would look just like Rudolf the laser mounted reindeer. Watchmen needed a laser armed mutant shark girl.

    3. Re:Watch out! by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Oh no, someone shined a red laser on it! Someone get Samuel L. Jackson to a bunker!

    4. Re:Watch out! by kms_one · · Score: 1

      You know I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!

    5. Re:Watch out! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      I'll be happy with your solution, as long as no snakes are involved.

      *I HATE M'f'ing snakes on a plain, or a plane!*

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    6. Re:Watch out! by Chas · · Score: 0

      Lasers are fine. Now FRICKIN' lasers... That'd be bad. Like Paris Hilton bad...

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    7. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like something the Trans-siberian Orchestra would head up.

    8. Re:Watch out! by MindKata · · Score: 1

      "They would look just like Rudolf the laser mounted reindeer"

      Only if Rudolf was eaten by sharks and Santa then had to water ski behind them.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    9. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You all have it wrong!! It's "lasers" ..gotta put the quotes around it :P

  3. Suicide rate skyrockets by Umuri · · Score: 4, Funny

    as the sharks bludgeon themselves on the sides of the tunnel, being unable to plug their ears as scientists incessently torture them with 90s remakes that completely lack christmas spirit.

    --
    You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    1. Re:Suicide rate skyrockets by opposabledumbs · · Score: 1

      Ah, but how do we know what they like? I read (in a fairly dubious source, an Uncle John's Bathroom Reader) that Great Whites can be persuaded to mate in captivity through listening to "My heart will go on" by Celine Dion. The Titanic version.

      Apparently, no other song or version will do the trick. SO, if they like that, they may actually like this crap, in which case there's finally a point to the whole industry.

    2. Re:Suicide rate skyrockets by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Funny

      From the movies I've seen, I'm sure the sharks will have their revenge on the scientists sooner or later.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Suicide rate skyrockets by ewrong · · Score: 1

      Yeah surely playing them Slade's Merry Christmas Everybody and Wham's Last Christmas is more likely to drive them mad than give them enjoyment. The guests of Holiday Inn Kensington would seem to agree: http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/latest/2008/12/09/slade-hit-merry-christmas-everybody-banned-by-hotel-115875-20957466/

    4. Re:Suicide rate skyrockets by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Didn't we try this in Panama?

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  4. Re:I'm a girl on Slashdot by MrKevvy · · Score: 4, Funny

    re: "Mod me up because I have a vagina and I advertise it through my username!"

    Hmmm... "Anonymous Coward". Yes, kind of an obscure reference but, indeed, you are correct there. :^p

    --
    -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
  5. The water outside is delightful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But these great whites are so damn frightful.

  6. Re:Want to know about sharks and x-mas tunes? by MrKevvy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Indeed, for those of us who suffered through the fads of the 1970's, there is a horrid piece of kitsch called "Santa Jaws", a parody of A Visit From Saint Nicholas, brought to you by the same source as the slightly more famous Mr. Jaws.

    "Santa Jaws" is so (deservedly) obscure that it doesn't appear on YouTube nor are its lyrics available anywhere except here and only from memory, and only due to being unavailable anywhere else.

    Yet, it appears to have finally had a purpose after all. :^p

    --
    -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
  7. Best Guess... by maz2331 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The best guess I have is that they probably won't care about it at best, or they will just be somewhat annoyed by the noise.

    Now, if it were something like Two-Fin Shakur or even Mariah Carp we might get a scientifically valid result.

    1. Re:Best Guess... by shawb · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's obvious that sharks would be into cock rock.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  8. Their next experiment is... by PCeye · · Score: 1

    to test if ants can be trained to sort tiny screws in space.

  9. Umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who the hell is funding this?

    1. Re:Umm.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Who the hell is funding this?

      An anonymous bald guy in a silver suit.
             

  10. Good Work Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    who says our tax dollars aren't being put to good use?

    1. Re:Good Work Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, who needs health care when you've got sharks dancing on christmas songs?

    2. Re:Good Work Guys! by adnonsense · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey, that would be our tax *pounds*, thankyou very much!

    3. Re:Good Work Guys! by lebscorpio · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same thing I say whenever I hear more these silly stuff. I might be judgmental when I call this research silly, but all that effort could have been placed somewhere more productive (think humans). But then again, every aspect of science is important. I might not be interested in this but many others would.

    4. Re:Good Work Guys! by JuanCarlosII · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me who RTFA, but I'm not sure that the "scientists" at Loch Lomond Sea Life Centre are necessairly qualified to conduct human research. This isn't a university that's conducting this "research", it's an aquarium, and not one that receieves any tax *pounds* at that.

    5. Re:Good Work Guys! by andrewd18 · · Score: 1

      I actually gained pounds this year. Clearly I'm not being taxed high enough.

    6. Re:Good Work Guys! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      There are usually a lot of a Americans waddling about Scotland but didn't realise they were all there just to fund this research.

    7. Re:Good Work Guys! by Orange+Crush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, this is an aquarium doing a little "research" for minimal cost to entertain visitors because "the sharks are listening to Christmas music too! That one over there, she really likes 'White Christmas!'" etc.

      This is kindof like if Seaworld were conducting "research" to determine Shamu's favorite song. It isn't necessarily advancing science, it's to amuse their guests.

    8. Re:Good Work Guys! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I might be judgmental when I call this research silly, but all that effort could have been placed somewhere more productive (think humans).

      Good idea. It would certainly be interesting to have a scientific analysis as to whether there is a human that actually likes "Last Christmas".

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:Good Work Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      all that effort could have been placed somewhere more productive (think humans)

      no silly, we already know humans enjoy listening to pop christmas songs. the sort of humans who you wish would be used to feed the sharks, anyhow

  11. Effect on humans by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More interesting question would be the effect of Christmas songs on humans. More specifically, whether the endless playing of them in every store starting from at least a month before Christmas causes people to buy more crap. You'd think it would cause the stores must have researched that kind of stuff, but then every person I know regards them as an annoyance. Personally, I would go out of my way to shop at a store that doesn't play them if I could only find one.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    1. Re:Effect on humans by MrEricSir · · Score: 0

      This may be the one and only reason to buy an MP3 player.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Effect on humans by jassa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It almost drove me insane when I was doing produce nightfill work at a local supermarket. Even though the store was closed to customers overnight, the managers would leave it running around the clock.

      My MP3 player saved my sanity that year.

    3. Re:Effect on humans by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the sharks, like me, will go out of their way to avoid the Christmas music. There is one station where I live that switches to 24/7 Christmas music starting before Thanksgiving. I can't listen to it for a full 6 weeks.
      Of course, I will also avoid Christmas parties with anyone but friends and family, and yes we have the token mid 40's slightly frumpy woman at work who likes to put up all kinds of decorations and try to get us to play "Dirty Santa".
      Fortunately, our Christmas party was offsite this year, and I just stayed at the office and worked.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:Effect on humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Target doesn't play store music at all.
      At least they didn't long ago.

  12. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop wasting our money, seriously.

  13. What by contra_mundi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This has little to do with science.

    1. Re:What by carlzum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. And what's the purpose of that image? I'd say it was the most useless image I've seen on a Slashdot article, but that honor goes to the artificial Christmas tree on an article about a guy who made a pyramid looking thing out of old hard drives.

    2. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Very wrong. Everyone who has been saying stuff such as "Waste of money" should just go back to reading their bibles.

      How come it isn't important to research if the same kind of things affect the moods of animals that affect our moods? How can a point be made that it isn't exactly the kind of knowledge that progresses our understanding of the world around us?

      In addition it has numerous practical uses. They range from calming animals in kennels, zoos, etc. to getting slightly more productive farms by just playing the right CDs at the barn to keeping some species from becoming extinct to helping pet owners.

      For example, I have a parrot. One of the most common reasons that pet parrots die is out of stress if something wierd happens. If the owner changes, if they both move to another house, if the family gets another pet... The parrot might become too stressed and stop eating alltogether. This kind of problems are very difficult to deal with.

      I also know from experience that what type of music I play affects his moods (he seems to like Tenacious D and Flight of the Concords but I can't anymore listen to heavy metal without headphones...). If I knew that there was certain kind of music proven to help him through stressful times, I could pay quite a much for the CD.

      But why is this a waste of money? Oh right, christmas songs! Any other type of songs at any other time of year... No prob. But christmas songs so it MUST be stupid research and waste of all those... Hmm. This research really costs only the price of a few CDs and few weeks of payment for the assistant that spends part of his time examining the sharks. Hell, I could fund this research myself.

  14. Re:Want to know about sharks and x-mas tunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your post about Christmas songs reminded me of this Slashdot thread from more than 4 years ago. It still cracks me up.

  15. I would like to see... by Skiron · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...what happens if they pipe the 'Jaws' movie theme music - see if they all shit themselves and get out of the water real fast.

    1. Re:I would like to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that they'll all become vegetarians to ensure that even Spielberg realizes that a re-make would flop. Viewers wouldn't think such sharks are particularly scary and the sharks wouldn't get raped (obligatory South Park).

    2. Re:I would like to see... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Barbara Streisands rendition of "Jinglebells".

      If that doesn't turn them into angry, psychotic movie sharks, not much will.

  16. Yep... by thewaker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we're gonna need a bigger grant...

    1. Re:Yep... by newgalactic · · Score: 1

      Roy Scheider (and myself) approves.

  17. Very evil. by BigDXLT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sharks with frickin' christmas tunes stuck in their heads...?

    1. Re:Very evil. by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      They are very, very ill-tempered.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
  18. Christmas Music for Sharks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great strides in the field of mad science, I suppose.

  19. What happened to Idle? by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Half year or so the new idle was introduced - fine with me. Some stupid stories to waste time, nicely grouped together.

    Then a few months ago now and then idle stories started making the front page. Acceptable, easy to filter using preferences.

    But nowadays I see two, three of these idle type stories hit the front page every day! Now this stupid shark thing, masking as a science story. Appropriately tagged 'idle' already.

    Please editors: keep idle type stories in the idle section, not in other sections, so we can filter them out if we like. And only real science stories in the science section. It's what those sections are made for, right?

    1. Re:What happened to Idle? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to filter the RSS feed? The subdomain is always "rss". I'd like to be able to filter the subdomains "idle" and "books". And other things besides subdomains if possible.

    2. Re:What happened to Idle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking fuck idle!!!!!! I passionately hate it. It's killing this service.

      If I can't avoid it, perhaps I should start avoiding /. as a whole.

      Does anybody have a suggestion what I should read instead? I'm a righteous (as in GNU) nerd.

      I thank you for any suggestions.

    3. Re:What happened to Idle? by Elrond,+Duke+of+URL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, good God yes. When one out of twenty stories is of the Idle variety, a story which must either be clicked on to view or briefly skipped over on the index, then Slashdot is truly ruined. What person would want this monster now?

      Really now, I just can't understand all the vitriol spewed over Idle. I honestly have found just a small amount of it musing, but its overall impact on Slashdot as a whole is minuscule. If you hate it so much, just ignore the damn thing! Or, stop being an AC and then you can filter it out of everything but the RSS feed.

      As for the GP's point... silly as this is, I don't have a problem with it being outside of Idle. Before there was an Idle section, stories which were serious candidates for an Ignobel award would have been fair game on Slashdot. Why not now?

      --
      Elrond, Duke of URL
      "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my enemies!"-Sam&Max
    4. Re:What happened to Idle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A simple 'Bah Humbug' will suffice next time, thank you.

    5. Re:What happened to Idle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It happened when 4chan was slashdotted, there was a brief connection (think merry and sauron through the palantir). I don't think the place has been the same since.

    6. Re:What happened to Idle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol'd

    7. Re:What happened to Idle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loosen up a bit, smoke some weed, go outside and meet some girls. You'll live longer..

  20. Bet you whales wont... by Cur8or · · Score: 0

    I hate Christmas songs because I am a mammal. The fish might like it, but they also like fish food. I bet you no mammal will like Christmas songs. If you do, you are a fish.

    --
    Winkey shortcut mapping for 64bit windows. WinKeyPlus
  21. Laser Sharks by aetherworld · · Score: 2, Funny

    test whether sharks enjoy listening to Christmas pop songs

    No. They don't.

    They enjoy lasers as christmas presents though...

  22. Ignobel by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

    I reckon that they're trying for an Ig Nobel prize
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ig_Nobel_Prize

  23. Where is PETA? by Atrox666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this isn't cruel animal testing I don't know what is.

    1. Re:Where is PETA? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      What would really be cruel is making them listen to every iTunes free song of the week.

  24. I hope they'll try one Christmas classic... by jejones · · Score: 2, Funny

    Surely sharks will like "Santa Jaws". (mp3 here).

  25. IDLE IDLE IDLE by MrMista_B · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    IDLE.

  26. next test: by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 3, Funny

    do sharks enjoy researchers?

  27. Torturing humans, ok but torturing sharks? by xophos · · Score: 4, Funny

    The evil in the USA knows no bounds.

    1. Re:Torturing humans, ok but torturing sharks? by Canazza · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The songs and other festive hits will be played to the sharks and rays at Loch Lomond Sea Life Centre in Balloch, Dunbartonshire"

      Loch Lomond is in Scotland ya muppet.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:Torturing humans, ok but torturing sharks? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The Americans are doing this over there to avoid some pesky inconvenient "shark rights" laws.

      *ducks*

    3. Re:Torturing humans, ok but torturing sharks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you can't exactly waterboard a shark!

    4. Re:Torturing humans, ok but torturing sharks? by barkingcorndog · · Score: 1

      The evil in the USA knows no bounds.

      I'm not certain, but I really don't think that Balloch, Dunbartonshir is in the US.

      --
      "I know together we'll make the possible totally impossible" - Homme
  28. Nonsense by bryan1945 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There is no reason that wifi over power lines should be federally banned as there is no proof that air guide signals impede the phase of electrical power signals, even 4 phase lines. It is known that wifi works on a QAM-8 orthaginal spacing while 4 phase always exhibits a rhomboid sine distribution. The twisted pair cross-current vs. serial overload buffer magnetisism is most overcome by employing a larger multi-linear, nor capacitance resistor in parallel with a Ombudsman-type ohm logger. It is true the fidelity of the upper octaves of any oboe solo is overcome by refractive copper tunings in the brass section, but this can be damped by wet rag dolls and the use of Criso oil as the valve lubricant. Further, songs in the key of G fail to pass the "spectrum de art" test since they are not composed in blue or aqua crayon. At the rate these researchers are going, dolphins will become the pray of off-tune, but well-meaning, carolers who believe in a "flat earth" with no harmonic resonances in the upper foundations of granite sub-articulates.

    Everyone understand, now?

    Nope, me neither.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  29. Re:I'm a girl on Slashdot by mvanvoorden · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you had one, maybe you wouldn't feel the need to be an asshole to a woman on an internet forum for no reason.

    You must be new here.

  30. I For One... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... welcome our new carol-loving, aquatic predatorial overlords.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  31. Speaking as a Shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can safely say I hate Christmas music.

    1. Re:Speaking as a Shark by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      Likewise Sharky.

      - George

      --
      - Dan
  32. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they enjoy Christmas tunas

  33. British? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm almost sure the scientists work in Britain. :P Such "science" comes from there mostly :)

  34. title by z-j-y · · Score: 1

    Is this funded by tax payer money? due to separation of church and state, your favoritism towards Christianity in your study is illegal.

  35. Shark stories should NEVER be marked Idle. by rHBa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No TRUE slashdot member would want to miss out on the opportunity to make shark/frikin laser beam jokes

  36. Enjoyment by Jay+Tarbox · · Score: 1

    I didn't RTFA, but can you really measure enjoyment? I highly doubt they enjoy much but tearing into flesh and the smell of blood.

  37. Shark & christmas songs? by nomad-9 · · Score: 1

    Question: Who the hell funds these projects? And why?

    1. Re:Shark & christmas songs? by trollebolle · · Score: 1

      Question: Who the hell funds these projects? And why?

      Some record label joining forces with evil and/or insane scientists for world domination? Sounds like the work of Dr. Evil, really.

  38. I want that job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know how I can get a job like that? I would love to come up with the most contrived non-sense & get paid for doing it. I've got one right now.

  39. Some people... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Some people have way to much time on their hands!

  40. Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have nothing better to test? What a waste.

  41. call PETA by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    What they are going to do to these poor sharks is torture, like what they do in Guantanamo Bay! Don't be surprised if the sharks fight back and the next story will be about some eaten scientists. Pray that sharks don't decide to take it out on all the humans and start inventing lasers!

  42. I think Tommy used to drink too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been there, done that

  43. Can bees think? by mqsoh · · Score: 1

    "Coming up next, can bees think? A new study confirms: No, they cannot." http://www.fact-archive.com/quotes/Family_Guy

  44. Wow by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

    It's crap like this that made me fall in love with ./

  45. Evil and funny! by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I never thought it possible, but the universe has bent in such a way that the extreme insipid evil that are xmax carols inflicted on poor helpless sharks is funny. Really funny. Sad... but really funny!

    Maybe we could find the actual sharks who have attacked humans and force them to listen to xmax music, ala "Clockwork Orange" to teach them a lesson. Let them free so that they will tell other sharks about the horrors.

    Of course, then we will see sharks beaching themselves like dolphins just to get the stupid tunes out of their tiny little brains.

  46. What they are really testing by bembleton · · Score: 1

    They're testing Christmas Music as effective shark repellent. What shark in his right mind would willingly stick around to listen to We Wish You A Merry Christmas.

    On the other hand, they may find that Jingle Bells sounds exactly like an injured seal.

  47. Maybe they should test the sharks to see.... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    .... What happens if they get Rickrolled instead.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  48. Ignoble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see an Ignoble Award looming.

  49. Re:I'm a girl on Slashdot by Hordeking · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with vagina? You got something against vagina? Vagina is good!

    Yeah, I don't know what I'd do without mine.

    Without it, you might have to get a job or something.

    Obligatory XKCD: http://www.xkcd.com/322/

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  50. Oh jeez... by Zooperman · · Score: 1

    Let's see... a government-funded study, to determine whether a sea animal likes music created by HUMANS. Uh huh... right. You know what, screw all the bleeding-heart types. I think "boondoggle" is the word we're all searching for here.

    --
    Zooperman
  51. Xmass songs + Sharks with Lasers = NOOOOOOOOOO!!! by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    Just don't give the sharks with lasers a listen to those xmass tunes, especially not frosty the cooked human tune... I'm melting... I'm melting...

  52. Perfect use of Grant money by fataugie · · Score: 1

    Of course, when I think of important scientific research, I think of sharks and music.

    BRILLIANT!

    (pack of fucking idiots...wasting money for this shit)

    --

    WTF? Over?

  53. Enough already! by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    I've kept quiet about the recent changes. I liked the AJAX a lot, and didn't really mind Idle. Not all of it is bad.

    But this really pisses me off samzenpus. Keep this bullshit in idle, this isn't science, this isn't interesting or important, and this isn't slashdot.

    Thank you.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Enough already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry to hear that you are so wrapped up in some psychotic fit. you can't see the need of stuff like this? It is to keep people like you from going nutballs and taking a pick-axe to burger king.

  54. Suicidal Sharks by giafly · · Score: 1

    Mr Brown said nurse sharks and other species of carpet shark which spend most of their time lying on the bed of the tanks, could be the best barometers for the impact of those pop tunes. Their reactions will tell the researchers whether the sharks are enjoying the music or whether it turns them off.

    Everyone knows sharks must swim or die and, when the alternative was Christmas pop songs, they've made their choice.

    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  55. they're probably learning somet;hing about brains by Coop · · Score: 1

    including yours. Or maybe they're answering basic questions about the workings of fish which, like all basic research, may or may not pay off in the future. But you can bet that the scientists don't care any more than you do about the human significance of the tunes involved, despite the implications of your trollish post.

    The other implication of posts like this is that the scientists are wasting money. Oh. I look at how, say, the DoD uses our money, and how the private sector (including, I daresay, *you*, my dear and cynical OP'er) spends it's money, and realize that money funding research would be madly wasted by the government or its citizens. So I say give it to the scientists. At least they're learning something, and sharing what they discover.

    --
    "If you're not passionate about your operating system, you're married to the wrong one."
  56. Would be easier if they used Buffett instead... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    It would be much easier to see their reaction, just see if they follow along-

    Fins to the left..< splash > Check.

    Fins to the right...< splash > Check.

  57. And this proves? by newgalactic · · Score: 1

    Let me guess, certain songs will stimulate sharks. Does it mean they like the music? Or that the rhythm reminds them of the excited heartbeat of a baby seal? Maybe its the magnets in the speaker systems. Or the electricity in the wires. What about differing tastes of music between individual sharks? We don't actually assume that music preference is species wide for sharks, do we? Get ready for some serious bias in interpreting whatever results these experiments find.

    Remember, Bing Crosby is for slow-aquatic-red-death

  58. WHAT HAS SCIENCE DONE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHAT HAS SCIENCE DONE

  59. Lawyer joke? by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

    There must be a lawyer joke in here somewhere???

  60. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christmas has jumped the shark

  61. You have got to be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so how many millions of dollars in grant money is this going to cost us? Is there no legitimate research left to conduct?

  62. That was my first thought too. by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, that was my first reaction also, but it might not be as dumb as it sounds. The summery says that someone showed fish recognizing melody. That is interesting. Not as interesting as a super massive black hole in the center of our galaxy, but interesting none the less. Now, consider the kind of funding that would be needed to do this study. They are not going out catching sharks and building huge aquariums with specialized facilities to do this study. They are piping Christmas music through existing speakers in an already functioning aquarium that likely is already doing other studies. Even the music is likely already pre-existing. The only costs to this study would be in keeping track of what music is playing (which would be playing anyways), logging the behavior of the sharks, which they are likely already doing, and reviewing the results when it is done.

    From a non-marine biologists point of view, it would be interesting to know if the music agitates sharks. If I made only twice what I make now, I might consider making a TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION of 20 or 30 thousand dollars to an aquarium for this kind of research. It would be interesting, and I might come out financially ahead from it. From a marine biologist's point of view, I can only imagine that this is at least as interesting as I find my PC specs, or OS choice. It also could have honest to goodness practical applications. Today, sharks are likely subjected to Christmas music in aquariums anyplace that Christmas is largely celebrated. So, if the music is going to cause the animals stress, it would make sense to turn the PA system off in the aquariums.

  63. IgNobel anyone? by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone has his eye on an Ignobel this year...
    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  64. No Effect? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    Wow, a sentence on slashdot that contains "Streisand" and not "Effect"...

    Screw the sharks with lasers, the world is already ending!

  65. This Song is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...yeah but would a shark like it?

  66. Wow, life imitating art! by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 1

    There was a episode of Metalocyplse that portrayed the band Dethklok making metal music for fish. The song it self is "Go into the water", if you want to research it. It just seems so weird that someone would being doing something like this in real life.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
  67. animal cruelty by speedtux · · Score: 1

    That's animal cruelty. Stop it. It's bad enough people have to suffer through this, but at least people have iPods.

  68. What if melody is the key? by BlankStare · · Score: 1

    What if melody turns out to be the key to real communication with aquatic life? Let the Uplifts Begin!

  69. It MUST be said... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    A CD of whatever music the sharks like best could be released under a name like "Lullabies for Lawyers", or "Carols for Counselors".

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.