The sooner we impose heavy tariffs on goods from countries that do not meet certain requirements for human rights and environmental policy, the better. We could do it now. It will hurt, but we could manage. If we wait a few decades, it will be too late.
Companies do not own words because they used them first. It's one thing to outright steal the name of a product. It's another thing to claim you own every word in that product's name.
If you name your product with a word that describes some important aspect of your product, it will not get a trademark. Want to call your car company "Emu Cars"? You can get a trademark. If you want to call your car company "Wheels Cars"? You cannot go after people for using the world "Wheels" in their ads and descriptions.
Therefore, there is no way you can get a trademark on your graphical windowing system called "Windows".
It does have to do with a walled garden. A company can make a possibly frivilous complaint againt the garden owner who can then kick you out, and you have no recourse. If it was not a walled garden and you could sell your app independently, the claimant would have to go after you directly, and you would have the opportunity to legally defend yourself.
"Based on a true story" means there may be a sliver of what actually happened in the movie, but you will not be able to pick it out. What actually happened is a more amazing story - some fantastic educators manged to build a cohesive multi-year plan to shepherd these kids through school - years and years of it, not just one miracle year - to help them reach their potential, and then saw the administrators destroy what they had built.
You cannot even wait that long. A disgruntled employee may already be working for a competitor or trying to sabatoge the company long before he quits. Always be in security audit mode.
I do not vote for judges who claim to be "tough on drugs/drug offenders" or judges who advertise their high conviction rate. (Which is pretty much all of them.) I want correct interpretation of the law and presumption of innocence, not jails full of non-violent offenders. The last one I remember voting for advertised that she (as a private lawyer) had success getting bad laws knocked down and going after corrupt politicians. She lost.
There are two kinds of classic enthusiats: the ones who work on their cars and the ones who write checks. If you work on your car, you want something pre-1996 anyway. If you write checks, you can write checks to the dealer.
Amazon, Azure, and Google are not going anywhere. Sure, a handful of small guys make take their stuff out of the cloud, but the big guys do not need to worry. Do you really think the government would put campaign contributions at risk by pulling this kind of shit with a Fortune 1000 company with the means to fight and put up a stink? Most people will never be aware of this issue.
Tell self driving car to head to the local big box store and wait in the loading bay until it receives the latest toy that I ordered online
I know Americans are stupid about using their cars for every trip whether it makes sense to drive or not, but sending your car to pick up a box instead of letting the FedEx truck do it is absolutely retarded.
I am enraged. And I keep voting for people who would change this. But they keep losing. By vast margins. By vast enough margins that I know if I take up the sword to fight for my freedom, I will be killed pretty quickly due to being hugely outnumbered. Without being lucky enough to get on a jury, what are we to do?
That does not need to be illegal. The cops already steal and damage your property, beat you up, and charge you with "resisting arrest" after dropping the other bogus charges. You have no recourse. Why go through the trouble of making it illegal?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Sadly, the fourth ammendment does not cover explicitly cover your fields.
Also sadly, the government and the voters seem to think that spending taxpayer money on cameras and police to go after people growing marijuana is a good use of resources. All you can do is get on juries and refuse to convict for non-violent drug-related charges.
E17 is not just landing. I have been using it for 7 years now. There have been some bugs and occasionally configuration broke on upgrade, but it has been usable. It is just approaching official release.
If the ISP was granted a local monopoly, received government money to build the infrastructure, was granted access to right-of-ways, or was licensed spectruem, it had better not be within its rights to punish citizens for alleged infringements.
Slashdot Mirror
Explain.
The sooner we impose heavy tariffs on goods from countries that do not meet certain requirements for human rights and environmental policy, the better. We could do it now. It will hurt, but we could manage. If we wait a few decades, it will be too late.
Companies do not own words because they used them first. It's one thing to outright steal the name of a product. It's another thing to claim you own every word in that product's name.
If you name your product with a word that describes some important aspect of your product, it will not get a trademark. Want to call your car company "Emu Cars"? You can get a trademark. If you want to call your car company "Wheels Cars"? You cannot go after people for using the world "Wheels" in their ads and descriptions.
Therefore, there is no way you can get a trademark on your graphical windowing system called "Windows".
It does have to do with a walled garden. A company can make a possibly frivilous complaint againt the garden owner who can then kick you out, and you have no recourse. If it was not a walled garden and you could sell your app independently, the claimant would have to go after you directly, and you would have the opportunity to legally defend yourself.
"Based on a true story" means there may be a sliver of what actually happened in the movie, but you will not be able to pick it out. What actually happened is a more amazing story - some fantastic educators manged to build a cohesive multi-year plan to shepherd these kids through school - years and years of it, not just one miracle year - to help them reach their potential, and then saw the administrators destroy what they had built.
New? Disney?
You cannot even wait that long. A disgruntled employee may already be working for a competitor or trying to sabatoge the company long before he quits. Always be in security audit mode.
Do you want to lower costs, or do you want your tax dollars going to tuition for interpretive dance majors?
I do not vote for judges who claim to be "tough on drugs/drug offenders" or judges who advertise their high conviction rate. (Which is pretty much all of them.) I want correct interpretation of the law and presumption of innocence, not jails full of non-violent offenders. The last one I remember voting for advertised that she (as a private lawyer) had success getting bad laws knocked down and going after corrupt politicians. She lost.
You do not have to use the ECU for that particular car. There are projects for aftermarket ECUs. http://www.megasquirt.info/
96 is the magic year not because it is more than 15 years old, but because you do not have to pass an OBDII emissions check.
I think most of the guys writing checks would not flinch at $800.
There are two kinds of classic enthusiats: the ones who work on their cars and the ones who write checks. If you work on your car, you want something pre-1996 anyway. If you write checks, you can write checks to the dealer.
Amazon, Azure, and Google are not going anywhere. Sure, a handful of small guys make take their stuff out of the cloud, but the big guys do not need to worry. Do you really think the government would put campaign contributions at risk by pulling this kind of shit with a Fortune 1000 company with the means to fight and put up a stink? Most people will never be aware of this issue.
I know Americans are stupid about using their cars for every trip whether it makes sense to drive or not, but sending your car to pick up a box instead of letting the FedEx truck do it is absolutely retarded.
I am enraged. And I keep voting for people who would change this. But they keep losing. By vast margins. By vast enough margins that I know if I take up the sword to fight for my freedom, I will be killed pretty quickly due to being hugely outnumbered. Without being lucky enough to get on a jury, what are we to do?
I would think an enclosed courtyard would be protected.
That does not need to be illegal. The cops already steal and damage your property, beat you up, and charge you with "resisting arrest" after dropping the other bogus charges. You have no recourse. Why go through the trouble of making it illegal?
The fourth ammendment explicitly states "houses". If the window is of a house, the fourth ammendment would prohibit it.
It applies to "persons, houses, papers, and effects". It does not mention fields.
I would be all in favor of an ammentment to change that to "persons, houses, papers, effects, and all personal property".
Sadly, the fourth ammendment does not cover explicitly cover your fields.
Also sadly, the government and the voters seem to think that spending taxpayer money on cameras and police to go after people growing marijuana is a good use of resources. All you can do is get on juries and refuse to convict for non-violent drug-related charges.
That has not been the default for a long time (years maybe).
E17 is not just landing. I have been using it for 7 years now. There have been some bugs and occasionally configuration broke on upgrade, but it has been usable. It is just approaching official release.
If the ISP was granted a local monopoly, received government money to build the infrastructure, was granted access to right-of-ways, or was licensed spectruem, it had better not be within its rights to punish citizens for alleged infringements.
Shiny things swaying in your field of vision while you are responsible for controlling a 3000 pound vehicle without hitting people. Brilliant.