The first language I learned was 8080 assembly at age 14. I hand assembled on paper and then programmed by entering hexadecimal machine code into a Prolog PROM programmer. A couple years later, I was working with CBASIC and a Z80 macro assembler on a CP/M system.
There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what is written on the outside of an envelope sent through the mail. Thus, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy about what is contained in the "outside of the envelope" of an email.
Despite any law, the only way to enforce this is to encrypt everything except what is needed to route the packet.
Vinnie from the mob backs his question by a threat of illegal activity: he will break your knee and/or window, if you refuse. The government does not do that — armed with the leverage given to them by the electorate, they may audit your tax-returns [investors.com] back into Stone Age, confiscate your bank-accounts [nytimes.com], cancel (or not renew) your business license (somehow, operating a business stopped being a right and became a privilege), open investigations into your business practices (sexual and racial discrimination, anyone?). All legal, all enthusiastically supported by the same sheep, who claim, the money they pay in taxes "buys civilization".
And at the end of all of the measures that the government takes against you are men with guns. The difference between Vinnie from the mob and the government is that Vinnie does not expect you to sanction his actions but the government does. The government expects your praise for persecuting you.
Putin will literally execute or imprison Twitter executives in Russia if they offend him. Trump couldn't really do that even here in the US even if we actually were dumb enough to elect him unless someone was stupid enough to directly threaten him.
So let's follow the rabbit a little bit further down this hole: If the police manage to set a precedent that cell phone location data can be used to establish the location of a given suspect to a particular crime, then what happens when the criminals start leaving their cell phones at home? Does that now qualify as an alibi?
No, then it means that the prosecutor can show premeditation, the criminal falsified evidence, and the criminal can be further charged with conspiracy. Either that or the investigator forgets to present it to the prosecutor so it is not turned over as Brady evidence.
When the location evidence exonerates you, the investigator can arrange to lose it or forget about it so the prosecutor does not have to turn it over as Brady evidence.
It probably does not matter for the application because people are not aware of the problem and manufacturers do not advertise it but I do not think power loss protection during writes can be implemented in such a small format unless it is added outside of the drive which would require more to the interface specification.
The phone company is a 3rd party because they have no standing to challenge the court or agency order based on the 4th amendment. The 4th amendment remedy is suppression which does not apply for the 3rd party either and the actual person being charged cannot argue that until they are in court.
And then he says, "I think a judge could take into account the usefulness of having had that national debate" which completely undermines Holden's credibility. The law specifically excludes that from any possible defense.
It is the same situation with various politicians saying Snowden should have acted within the system availing himself of various whistle-blower laws which do not apply to him as a contractor and offer no protection anyway.
If Netflix met the an ISP's peering requirements then why wouldn't the ISP peer with them? Doing so would bypass transit providers and their transit links which the ISP has to pay for. Installing the Netflix content distribution devices does the same thing.
The answer is that these ISPs compete with Netflix for video services and they can take advantage of their monopoly position to degrade traffic from Netflix to their customers in favor of their own services and they can extort Netflix.
There is no industry standard practice; each network sets their own requirements for peering. The best resource I know of is The Art of Peering: The Peering Playbook.
Just like with transfer caps, the ISPs are manipulating (lying about) the discussion for their own benefit. They have monopoly powers through captive customers and in many cases have an interest in degrading traffic which competes with services they offer like video.
The real collusion against it happening again is the requirement that a candidate get 15% in polling before being allowed in the presidential debates. Most polls dont include 3rd party candidates, therefore a third party candidate cannot get 15% in polls.
They do even more than that. When I did election security for a couple years in Southern California, I discovered that they did not even *count* the third party votes yet they reported numbers for them which coincidentally kept them below the threshold for being automatically included on the ballot in the next election. Election workers would also take ballot boxes home at night instead of transporting them directly to where they were opened to be counted.
I think they believe that there will not be a separate desktop market so they are sacrificing what they have now to further their interests in other markets. Based on the results, it is not working.
I wonder though how they manage their training program without such poor domestic internet connectivity. That must be done outside of North Korea also.
I just gave the reason; when the ACLU was founded, a stipulation from one of the major donors was that they *not* protect the 2nd Amendment.
And in 1920, what was the NRA doing? When the NRA got involved, which did not happen until after the NFA in 1934, up until the 1970, it supported gun control.
... they don't want another Windows XP, where a popular but mostly out of date OS keeps a small, bug significant chunk of the market long after support ends.
Then maybe they should release a replacement for Windows XP while not trying to leverage their monopoly onto other device formats.
I have been testing Windows 7 on another system and I hate it compared to XP. Features are missing, compatibility is lost, and any improvements are washed away by regressions.
Slashdot Mirror
And if a man defends himself against a woman, he is charged.
The first language I learned was 8080 assembly at age 14. I hand assembled on paper and then programmed by entering hexadecimal machine code into a Prolog PROM programmer. A couple years later, I was working with CBASIC and a Z80 macro assembler on a CP/M system.
Despite any law, the only way to enforce this is to encrypt everything except what is needed to route the packet.
It is not binding if there is no enforcement. This is just another way for the FBI which is part of the DOJ to say one thing and do another.
And at the end of all of the measures that the government takes against you are men with guns. The difference between Vinnie from the mob and the government is that Vinnie does not expect you to sanction his actions but the government does. The government expects your praise for persecuting you.
Or he could ask the FBI to do it if he wants them burned alive.
Do you mean like Joseph Nacchio?
I suspect the prosecution has a lot more pull getting evidence out of Google than a defendant does.
I see an application here for the Phone Drone.
No, then it means that the prosecutor can show premeditation, the criminal falsified evidence, and the criminal can be further charged with conspiracy. Either that or the investigator forgets to present it to the prosecutor so it is not turned over as Brady evidence.
When the location evidence exonerates you, the investigator can arrange to lose it or forget about it so the prosecutor does not have to turn it over as Brady evidence.
It probably does not matter for the application because people are not aware of the problem and manufacturers do not advertise it but I do not think power loss protection during writes can be implemented in such a small format unless it is added outside of the drive which would require more to the interface specification.
The phone company is a 3rd party because they have no standing to challenge the court or agency order based on the 4th amendment. The 4th amendment remedy is suppression which does not apply for the 3rd party either and the actual person being charged cannot argue that until they are in court.
And then he says, "I think a judge could take into account the usefulness of having had that national debate" which completely undermines Holden's credibility. The law specifically excludes that from any possible defense.
It is the same situation with various politicians saying Snowden should have acted within the system availing himself of various whistle-blower laws which do not apply to him as a contractor and offer no protection anyway.
You are joking, right?
If Netflix met the an ISP's peering requirements then why wouldn't the ISP peer with them? Doing so would bypass transit providers and their transit links which the ISP has to pay for. Installing the Netflix content distribution devices does the same thing.
The answer is that these ISPs compete with Netflix for video services and they can take advantage of their monopoly position to degrade traffic from Netflix to their customers in favor of their own services and they can extort Netflix.
There is no industry standard practice; each network sets their own requirements for peering. The best resource I know of is The Art of Peering: The Peering Playbook.
Just like with transfer caps, the ISPs are manipulating (lying about) the discussion for their own benefit. They have monopoly powers through captive customers and in many cases have an interest in degrading traffic which competes with services they offer like video.
They do even more than that. When I did election security for a couple years in Southern California, I discovered that they did not even *count* the third party votes yet they reported numbers for them which coincidentally kept them below the threshold for being automatically included on the ballot in the next election. Election workers would also take ballot boxes home at night instead of transporting them directly to where they were opened to be counted.
The DoJ argued that Obamacare was a tax and not a tax as circumstances required. Contradictions in court are no impediment.
While removing features and compatibility that they do want.
I think they believe that there will not be a separate desktop market so they are sacrificing what they have now to further their interests in other markets. Based on the results, it is not working.
And the only ones stupid enough to confess.
Why would you ever admit to doing a good deed like this? Law enforcement is not paid to not arrest you and the courts are not paid to not convict you.
I wonder though how they manage their training program without such poor domestic internet connectivity. That must be done outside of North Korea also.
Even a stopped clock is correct twice a day. The U.S. lacks credibility when making such unsupported statements.
I just gave the reason; when the ACLU was founded, a stipulation from one of the major donors was that they *not* protect the 2nd Amendment.
And in 1920, what was the NRA doing? When the NRA got involved, which did not happen until after the NFA in 1934, up until the 1970, it supported gun control.
Then maybe they should release a replacement for Windows XP while not trying to leverage their monopoly onto other device formats.
I have been testing Windows 7 on another system and I hate it compared to XP. Features are missing, compatibility is lost, and any improvements are washed away by regressions.