Slashdot Mirror


Massive Backlash Building Over Windows 10 Upgrades (fortune.com)

Some Windows users are now disabling critical updates on their systems rather than face the prospect of mistakenly upgrading to Windows 10. An anonymous reader writes: "By pushing it on users in such a heavy-handed way, Microsoft is encouraging users who have very valid reasons to stick with Windows 7/8 to perform actions that leave their machines open to attack," writes PC World's senior editor. He adds that "Over the past week, I've received more contact from readers about this issue than I have about everything else I've written over the rest of my career combined."

Now even China's official news agency is reporting that users are angry about stealthy Windows 10 upgrades, saying over 1.2 million complaints appeared on one microblogging site. It quotes a legal advisor with the Internet Society of China, who says Microsoft "has abused its dominant market position and broken the market order for fair play," saying that lawsuits would be justified over Microsoft's action. "Yang Shuo, a worker at a Beijing-based public relations company, told Xinhua that the sudden update interrupted his drafting of a business plan and led to a meeting cancellation for a deal worth 3 million yuan ($457,735). 'Just because I didn't see the pop-up reminder does not mean I agreed.'"

In a possibly-unrelated development, the Chinese military plans to send nuclear submarines into the Pacific Ocean.

501 comments

  1. Business plan = profit by gavron · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, I am writing a business plan too ,

    Dammit, I just lost $457,000!!!

    *Goes to join the MPAA and BSA to help them explain how their lost profits are calculated*

    E

    1. Re:Business plan = profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Business plan from a PR company means advertising plan, not shark tank. So, yeah, his company would have gained $457,000 revenue if not for the update. Then there's the lost revenue from the client company's advertising campaign being delayed. MS is at fault for a million USD at minimum, probably several million, from just this case alone.

    2. Re:Business plan = profit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If the deal was cancelled because of it (it only says the meeting was, could have been rescheduled) it's probably because they couldn't believe that the guy's IT was so terrible he couldn't just move to a different computer and carry on working.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Business plan = profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was just happened to me this morning! I turn off my computer immediately! Ya! I am lucky not to loss any penny! I m worry it will come back again. Just remind everyone to watch out! don't let it sneaky in again! Microsoft is so violent!

    4. Re:Business plan = profit by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

      Because it wasn't the fact that he was putting it together last minute and didn't save frequently (which MS Word and Excel do for you anyway).

      Ah, human nature. It's never their fault for screwing up.

      MS has become the entity to point for all failures related to computer. Getting old and redundant!

    5. Re: Business plan = profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These updates pop up at any fucking time. Even if you deny them. You keep getting bombarded.

      So please mr computer master tell us how you fix this problem? GWX control panel? Nope, can't use that on machines in an AD environment since the admin sets the policies.

    6. Re: Business plan = profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My aunt was complaining about Windows 10 and how ever since the upgrade everything was broken. She said her email wasn't working now and asked if there was anything I could do. I said I would be happy to take a look, and a minute later she handed me her iPad.

      She was convinced that all tech problems in the house were related some how to Windows 10. I can see how microsoft just wants to be done with this forever so that they can actually address problems with their OS not 3 back generations and 20 .NET runtimes and then still get blamed for the rain.

    7. Re: Business plan = profit by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Local admin revokes write and execute permisions to %systemroot%\GWX and its sub-objects from TrustedInstaller and System users.

      This prevents MS from installing or running their shit there. The updates will silently fail on install.

    8. Re: Business plan = profit by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      They are bad if they force the updates and they are bad if they don't.

      I've personally never heard this complaint until now. I have not changed the defaults and the popup will come up once in a while and can dismiss it. If I leave the computer idle for a period of time at night it will reboot which I believe is very acceptable.

  2. They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When they approved a security update installs a Windows 10 nag they all but proved there are no updates left for Windows 7 regardless of when the "end of life" is. So people cut them off.

    1. Re:They did it to themselves by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is what happens when millenials and hipsters make decisions. They're incapable of understanding that someone else might see things differently to them. If they think it's a good idea, it must be a good idea, and anyone who thinks it's shit is wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's about how we feel as well. We've never allowed updates to install fully automatically, but our default policy used to be that we'd normally install recommended updates unless we had a good reason not to. Not long after the Windows 10 mess started, that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want.

      The thing that makes me nervous, even though it's quite rational as a business decision, is that until we've had time to vet, we now don't install anything. Our assumption is that the risk of some new security vulnerability that isn't patched for a day or two and also gets past all our other precautions is lower than the risk of Microsoft shafting us with an update we really don't want.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:They did it to themselves by Megol · · Score: 1

      Bull.

    4. Re:They did it to themselves by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "This is what happens when millenials and hipsters make decisions."

      I've never seen 'hipster' used in the same context as 'Windows' before. What's next - hipster shuffleboard?

    5. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also why do they let m$ to cum in their mouth....... they have kylin for crying out loud.... for free....

    6. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a stupid thing to say, and you're a stupid person for saying it.

    7. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were using Windows 10 before it was cool!

    8. Re:They did it to themselves by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And then the millenials and hipsters defend it, saying "microsoft needs to make a profit, so why is everyone so grumpy?"

    9. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      maybe you can clarify this mystery for me. Critical updates and reocmmended updates are two different categories. The Winodws 10 update is a recommended update, not a critical update. So if one turns off recommended updates, one does not get the Windows 10 upgrade. But the critical updates still come down fine. So how do you go from installing recommended updates AND critical updates, to not installing any updates at all? Is it just an issue of mistrust?

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    10. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      On Thursday I turned off "get recommended updates like you get important updates" (or whatever the exact text it) on my wife's computer. I *just* got a call from her telling me that her computer started installing Windows 10. I changed the setting specifically to avoid the 10 install. I double checked that my desired setting was in place after a reboot. So, no, turning off recommended updates doesn't always avoid 10.

      capthca: outrages

    11. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. Thanks for making a cogent reply to this question I've been asking since the whole business started.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    12. Re:They did it to themselves by Calydor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, that's true for everyone using Windows 10 today, so ...

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    13. Re:They did it to themselves by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      If your running Windows 7 Enterprise, that shouldn't be needed. It doesn't "qualify" for the "free upgrade" and you shouldn't ever get the screen at all.

    14. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you're describing Lennart Poettering and systemd, the two biggest bits of vaginal discharge to hit the Linux world.

    15. Re:They did it to themselves by Ken+D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well it started out as an Optional Update.
      Then it became a Recommended Update.
      Next it will become a Critical Update.
      And finally an Unavoidable Update.

    16. Re: They did it to themselves by macs4all · · Score: 1, Troll

      Maybe you are fucking stupid and did it wrong,or maybe you are one of the hundreds of /.ers who make shit up. Microsoft ignoring properly set policies is only one of the possibilities here.

      Catcha: dumbass

      Well, we found at least one MS shill...

    17. Re:They did it to themselves by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If your running Windows 7 Enterprise, that shouldn't be needed. It doesn't "qualify" for the "free upgrade" and you shouldn't get the screen yet

      FTFY

    18. Re:They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      T Not long after the Windows 10 mess started, that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want.

      We had those sort of issues even back in XP+1 days - when Vista was the hot mess. Updates were always bitching something up, so meetings got interesting foro a while. Since I couldn't be in every conference room at once - especially since some of them wer my own meetings, I ended up having a couple "special laptops" that was offline most of the time, and when I did update them they were thourougly checked out.

      It's pretty pathetic when you have to keep a computer off the network in order to keep it functioning. Even more pathetic that so many Windows fans seem to think this is SOP.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re: They did it to themselves by macs4all · · Score: 1

      We really need to come up with a good name for people who accuse anyone who disagrees with them a shill.

      As soon as they stop doing it to me.

    20. Re:They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      maybe you can clarify this mystery for me.

      Today's windows updates when it damn well feels like it.

      Or even tricks you into it. I have one machine that pops up a blank window, always on top. nothing in it. when you try to get rid of it, it starts to install W10.

      Is it just an issue of mistrust?

      Is what I just described the tactics of a trustworthy company? I fear Microsoft bitching up my computer more than any malware . Though some would consider that to be redundant.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    21. Re:They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's interesting. Thanks for making a cogent reply to this question I've been asking since the whole business started.

      Did you doubt the veracity of all the people who have said they "upgraded" without their input?

      Or otherwise trick you into it, in some pretty devious ways, like my blank Window that stays on top and won't go away. In the end, I have to click in the window - anywhere will do - and quickly kill the next window that pops up, because it is starting the upgrade process.. In the end, it only make sense - a company that downloads an operating system on your computer without your permission probably doesn't feel that they need your permission to do anything.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re: They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      We really need to come up with a good name for people who accuse anyone who disagrees with them a shill.

      Insightful.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    23. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are only two types of people who can possibly think that Windows 10 with all of its spyware, adware, bundled garbage and forced ways is good. The naive and the shills.

    24. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's pretty pathetic when you have to keep a computer off the network in order to keep it functioning.

      Indeed. I've done the same thing with the "special laptops" when demonstrating a new web app to someone, just in case Chrome decided to update and break it on the morning of the presentation. You can probably imagine how that habit started.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    25. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I mostly work with small businesses. These organisations are far more likely to be on Pro than Enterprise.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    26. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      So how do you go from installing recommended updates AND critical updates, to not installing any updates at all? Is it just an issue of mistrust?

      In a word, yes. We're talking about small businesses here. Some of them are generally technically clued up but too small to have dedicated IT staff, so anything to do with maintaining the IT systems is time out of someone else's day and minimizing overheads is important.

      It used to be the case that installing security updates and other things that were described as improving stability and the like generally worked, and following Microsoft's recommendations seemed to give acceptable results while keeping the systems as safe and reliable as possible.

      Since following Microsoft's advice no longer has that result, and since anything to be manually reviewed and installed takes time, a lot of the businesses I work with are now defaulting to install-nothing, and then doing the minimum sensible amount on top of that to keep things security patched as necessary.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    27. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your kidding, right? We have a huge shuffleboard bar in park slope. It's impossible to get in. You need to book a month in advance, all hipsters. 1000% truth. Its called the royal palms. Look it up.

    28. Re: They did it to themselves by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      The AC is not as much disagreeing, but suggesting that the user rather than Microsoft is be blamed in these seemingly accidental upgrades, because he is "fucking stupid" and is making shit up.

      What "good name" would you suggest?

    29. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What spyware? Windows does attempt to transmit telemetry data back to MS, which is easily blocked if you know what you are doing, but no one has been able to prove what data is being transmitted and how this data is harmful to the user. Do you know? I am being serious. And please define the adware you speak of. I have a strong feeling you don't really understand the meaning of the word adware. And as far as bundled garbage goes have you bought an Android or iPhone in the past 10 years? Those devices are riddled with bundled applications that are damn near impossible to get rid of. Or do you consider the inclusion of shortcuts to MS services and cloud apps as bundled crap? Shortcuts that can be removed with one click of the mouse. It's the retailers and manufacturers who are responsible for installing their own applications before the machine is sold.

    30. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking, "sounds about right".

    31. Re:They did it to themselves by NotAPK · · Score: 4, Funny

      First they came for the Optional Updates, and I did not speak out...

    32. Re:They did it to themselves by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      would rather chance a malware infection than an involuntary Windows 10 upgrade

      They're the same thing aren't they?

    33. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you went into WU and right clicked / Hide update just like every other update, right?

      I still don't have an issue with my computer. I'm not sure why the people not wanting W10 make it so it doesn't...

    34. Re:They did it to themselves by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      When they approved a security update installs a Windows 10 nag they all but proved there are no updates left for Windows 7 regardless of when the "end of life" is. So people cut them off.

      I lost all trust in Microsoft with my Win7 update KB3035583. The update claimed "it made
      upgrading to Win10 easier" now seen as an inside joke at the time.

      April 11 2016 apprently I was the only person in the world who found the file that was to
      of been sent out - my hosts file had stopped it from leaving.

      This file was to of left April 5 and contained browser caches which showed what you
      done online over the course of 24 hours. All of the AV and ad blockers were in on it as it was
      allowed to pass em all.

      Mentioning this directory and warning others on sevenforums got me banned for posting
      crap.

      This was located in the GWX directory, where were three more config.cfg files. Having
      removed the GWX directory I could only read on /. what each was for when one came into
      action over the course a year.

      Windows future looked bleak with Win10 being more of a tracker/stalker (your
      choice). I went to Mint KDE, a bit more trust in that direction.

      Only now is how I felt about MS being shown by others, just took them a year to catch on.

    35. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adware is right there at install. Your *start menu* will start selling Minecraft and other MS games at you. If Windows 10 were a person, it would drink cheap beer from cans on the street, if you pay it the least bit of attention it'll start tailing you home each day and finally shank you in the back and steal your wallet.

    36. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. This is what happens when a monopolists business needs are directly opposed to their customers needs. The customer gets screwed. Hopefully this will lead to Microsoft getting screwed into a very deeply buried coffin.

    37. Re: They did it to themselves by cm5oom · · Score: 1

      More insightful than your comment to be honest. I was pointing out that the word shill gets thrown around a lot, especially in windows threads.

    38. Re: They did it to themselves by cm5oom · · Score: 1

      The problem is that even people who just try to counter the circle jerk bs get called shills. Even when they agree that microsoft is doing some bad stuff, just not as much as what some people claim. Hell there's probably people thinking I'm a shill and I haven't even defended windows one bit.

    39. Re: They did it to themselves by Hylandr · · Score: 0

      Can't we just fuck each others Mums and get along?

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    40. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      No, but so far no one has answered the question except that one AC above. There is a check box in the Update settings to disable "recommended" updates. These aren't the same updates as the monthy critical IE update and all the other security updates. I have this check box unchecked on all my Win 7 hosts and there is no problem with updates or nags of any sort. This is exactly the course that Microsoft recommends, as seen in the now infamous "trick" notification. It seems a lot of people don't understand this, since they seem unable to answer my question as to whether or not they had followed this option when all their awful stuff happened. You haven't answered it either. Is there something about that explanation that is unclear?

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    41. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      Do you know of any cases where folks with the 'Give me recommended updates the same way I receive important updates' option is unchecked and the Windows 10 upgrade has been an issue? That's what Microsoft says to do, and I haven't had any problems with it. That doesn't mean everyone had the same experience, certainly, but from the news stories and jabber here it seems not many people understand this setting exists or its theoretical relationship to the upgrade.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    42. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously telling me there's not a faction around here that makes shit up in Microsoft posts on a regular basis?

      "I used to be a die-hard windows user but THIS is the last straw I'm installing Mint tonight!".

      "Windows won't install on this windows PC but Debian did without a hitch. LOL I'm driving over to put this on my grandma's PC she won't even notice cuz it's so awesome."

      "Windows won't let me do some crazy ass thing. I need total control dammit im getting a Chromebook"

      Or my favorite - "this install bricked my machine again right after that office patch broke all my document compatibility. Fuck this, I'm installing Ubuntu and Libre Office right now!"

      Please excuse me if I need a little more convincing that regular posters on /. are dealing with actual Microsoft issues.

    43. Re:They did it to themselves by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "... that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want."

      1. Isn't that kind of expensive?
      2. if you can't trust your supplier not to try to trick you why are you using that supplier?

      Am I the only one that finds this situation to be surreal?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    44. Re:They did it to themselves by Megane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know what you're doing about updates you don't want, but Microsoft has "revised" the update in question at least ten times so far. Each time an update gets "revised", the hidden status goes away. If you simply "hide" updates that you don't want and leave Windows Update on automatic, one day you will wake up to Windows 10. You probably aren't doing this, but a lot of people are.

      I just gave up and turned Windows Update completely to manual-only and stopped bothering with it. But I normally don't use Windows for anything but playing a limited number of online games, and I certainly don't use IE/Edge (web browsing is done on a laptop running OS X), so my attack surface is a bit smaller than average.

      In contrast, I've seen an "Upgrade to El Capitan!" window only two or three times, and I have at least three Macs that I work with regularly. I've tried to figure out how to stop it, but it's never happened enough for me to learn anything about it. It never tries to force the update (I'm sticking with 10.9 for now), and apparently it actually respects your decision not to upgrade, instead of repeatedly nagging, downloading 6+ gigabytes without permission, and then forcing the install. Maybe Microsoft could learn something from that.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    45. Re:They did it to themselves by Megane · · Score: 1

      It started when you decided to use Chrome as your web browser? (ducking)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    46. Re: They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More insightful than your comment to be honest. I was pointing out that the word shill gets thrown around a lot, especially in windows threads.

      The Microsoft paid shill has escaped the once narrow definition, and now represents anyone who makes over the top statements in support of Windows or any OS or device. Shill might be one of the kindest words to use for these jokers. The "every problem is your fault" folks, the misinformers, the deny that Microsoft is doing what they say they are doing folks, the blatant liars. Many doing it all for free, and approaching troll and axe grinder status

      And yes - this does happen a lot in Windows threads. There is a reason for that. Shill fits pretty well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    47. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I can't give a useful answer to that one. As far as I know, none of the organisations I'm talking about would be installing updates without approval anyway.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    48. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, but if one would read other then slashdot for os news. One would have noticed, that even programmers, in Windows have gotten updated against their will. I would specifically point to Krebs on security. Since Jan, they have had several Wednesday issues from readers reported. It seems to be a common thread, that you have to recheck all security settings after an update. Many of the updates change your security settings and lower your security system. They go back to default settings, without a warning.

    49. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an issue. I have ms on 2 machines, 7+10. My wife and extended family use mint, and I have Android and Apple machines also. The group likes to have machines that start and are able to use now, not five minutes from now. 10, likes to start and check for updates prior to allowing you to use it, not user friendly. And droid and Apple do this in the background, and Linux let's you choose when to update. More friendly. But would grandma know, or see what happened? Why she cannot get to Facebook, right away? That's a problem. It's the one that gets the most calls. Why? But, a few minutes of talking, let's the win system do its thing, and it will now work, that is user unfriendly, unless they leave it on, all day.

    50. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. Isn't that kind of expensive?

      Yes and no. It's annoying that someone has to spend an hour or two each month looking up the new security updates to make sure they're not doing questionable things before installing. It's a lot less expensive than having our systems compromised, whether by updating to Windows 10, installing telemetry that potentially raises regulatory or contractual compliance issues, etc.

      2. if you can't trust your supplier not to try to trick you why are you using that supplier?

      When we bought these systems, we did trust Microsoft. Now we don't, because their behaviour is no longer trustworthy. We aren't currently buying any new Windows-based systems. We are currently experimenting with other platforms. There's nothing inconsistent here, just a supplier that unfortunately changed for the worse over time.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    51. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      We've never allowed fully automated updates on any of the systems I'm talking about. The change in policy for us is that when patch day came around, we used to basically just go down the list and tick anything recommended unless we'd heard there was a problem. Now we go down the list, untick everything first, and then re-tick any security issues that appear to be relevant to us and not bundling anything we don't want after we've looked them up outside Windows Update.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    52. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      There's no need to duck, because that's exactly when it started. The catch is that it wasn't me choosing to use Chrome, it was some of our clients.

      The so-called evergreen web browsers are, in my professional opinion as a web developer, one of the worst ideas our industry has come up with in a long time, and comparable to the Windows 10 issues in terms of how much damage they cause and time they waste.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    53. Re:They did it to themselves by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Well it started out as an Optional Update.
      Then it became a Recommended Update.
      Next it will become a Critical Update.
      And finally an Unavoidable Update.

      then the Punitive Update

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    54. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Windows 10 installs updates in the background and doesn't prevent you from doing shit. The only thing you might be referring to is after updates were downloaded and needed to be applied on the next boot. That'll happen after patch Tuesday, not every fucking day or every patch Tuesday.

    55. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do apologise for not replying with my username, but I might point out that in my opinion, I would think that Microsoft should not have such things in place that could cause 'accidental upgrades'. I would say that it is becoming more and more difficult to avoid upgrades. As an interesting side note, the technical department I work in have what we amusedly refer to as spy machines, and though they do have critical updates set to run, no recommended updates are enabled. Yet, despite there being NO one agreeing to the update (there's really only me using these machines), one by one, each of those machines are updating to Windows 10. That causes some annoyance when I do log in to work on someone's hardware by remote, then I get treated to 'Hi' 'All of your files and settings are right when you left them.' etc. since it means that I cannot do what I logged in to do until it finishes, which many of us have experienced can take in excess of twenty minutes. These are netbooks at that, which already run pretty slowly.

      Not the most mission critical machines, although we need them to be there when we need to use them, as they save us/me from multiple hour trips to locations (the farthest one currently is seven hours, which then involves per diems, hotel bills, and travel costs.)

      Anyway, recommended updates on those machines are off. I get to log into those machines, that precisely two people (as of now) have access to (and one of them just has access because he's the head of the department, and never uses it), and somehow, they've mysteriously updated themselves.

      I have never selected update to Windows 10 on those machines, as we're fine with Windows 7 on them, and no one has agreed to the update (the head of the department hates remote updates of all types), yet W10 is getting updated.

      Odd, no?

    56. Re: They did it to themselves by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      We really need to come up with a good name for people who accuse anyone who disagrees with them a shill.

      In the above case, I think we can just use the term "correct".

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    57. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope there is a class action lawsuit against MS for forcing (yes forcing) an update to a different OS without the permission of the user.

      I have a friend that uses a laptop to send business emails to customers on a bulk basis. He was having difficulty with his system, I told him to back it up - but run chkdsk first to get a drive that would pass the backup. He let the laptop run (chkdsk) overnight and the next morning woke up to Windows 10 installed.

      He could not run any of his work programs that send the emails on a daily basis.... He had to wait for me to get back in town (5 business days) in order to fix his laptop. Funny thing is we had shutoff auto update and selected do not update without permission because Win7 would come along and shutdown while his mail programs were sending out his emails.

      He has two other systems running win7 and win8.1 - those have not auto-updated yet.

    58. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I tell my friends they have the "Windows virus"..... They look puzzled - then I state Microsoft.... It's a virus.

    59. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a bloody scapegoating idiot with no evidence. This is what happens when Slashdot goes senile.

    60. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only Windows enterprise and pro let you defer the updates to a later date. Not Indefinitely. In the other versions; updates are mandatory. Eventually THEY WILL be installed. Whenever microshit feels like it's time.

      Meanwhile I'm on OS X with little snitch and have had 0 issues in. 13+ years.

    61. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking userid...

      Hipster confirmed.

    62. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Telemetry" is a marketing weasel word for "spyware". I call it what it is. Oh and the reason nobody can tell you what Microsoft is collecting is because encrypts it, even from the *user*, who should be allowed access to everything. That tells me that Microsoft doesn't want the user to know what they are collecting. The Windows 10 EULA also states that Microsoft is allowed to collect any and all data from your PC, including private data. Quite frankly, I don't care what Microsoft is collecting because they shouldn't be collecting any data whatsoever.

      Ads appearing on the lock screen? Ads appearing on the start menu? Ads appearing in apps? I guess you missed all of that. I don't want a single ad in my operating system.

    63. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most recent Windows 10 outbreak comes in the critical list.

    64. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only windows 10. Previous windows versions allowed you to defer even if running home.

      Christ this is a huge problem but you guys should stop spreading bullshit about it at least.

    65. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Some days, we really need a (-1, Hopelessly Incorrect) mod.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    66. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHILL! SHIIIIIILLLLLLLL!!!!

    67. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know nothing, junior.

      Now be quiet. Adults are talking.

    68. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just trying to rationalize because you got suckered into Windows 10 and don't want to admit that it's malware garbage.

    69. Re:They did it to themselves by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "microsoft needs to make a profit"

      Do we get to vote on this?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    70. Re:They did it to themselves by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      ...until MS decides that it is critical now that you update.

      You will know after the fact.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    71. Re:They did it to themselves by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      It's true that many people don't understand that. And Microsoft is counting on it.

      It's also true that many people, that did understand it, got "updated" anyway.

      I have turned off all updates and downloads from Microsoft, because it really is my evaluation that the "updates" are more dangerous that the "hackers".
      At least to me... YMMV.

    72. Re:They did it to themselves by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      "... that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want."

      1. Isn't that kind of expensive?
      2. if you can't trust your supplier not to try to trick you why are you using that supplier?

      Am I the only one that finds this situation to be surreal?

      Not the only one. But when all other companies in that industry use the same software, you might have no choice in what you use. (That may be changing now...)

      And the careful checking is done by every competent company that doesn't want to die, reguardless of system used.

    73. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much difference it makes as long as you aren't using IE for Internet browsing. The browser is really where vulnerabilities are generally targeted, most of the rest is either download a fake application or just using mechanisms already present in the OS. Those aren't necessarily patchable.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    74. Re: They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      And none of those reports indicate that person understands the setting I mentioned. Just like the PC World "trick" notification story, where not only do they not know about this setting, they don't even know what a notification is.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    75. Re:They did it to themselves by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      See "Dancing Bunny syndrome". 8-{

    76. Re: They did it to themselves by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      No I'm not; You are making shit up.

      I was telling you about the previous post only. That has nothing to do with what other people have said in the past.

    77. Re:They did it to themselves by qfman · · Score: 0

      based on how they handled the last few years of XP, I stopped updating my windows 7 computers when they announced windows 10.

      --
      They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
  3. Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging site by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft doesn't even look at the micro blogging site, what good does complaining on it do?

    Oh, and HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate /v "DisableOSUpgrade" /t REG_DWORD /d 0x1

  4. in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    nobody attacks apple for agressivly pushing their updates. On my ipad almost every time i pick it up there is a screen about an IOS update. i say 'sod off' and it takes me to my lock screen code page. unless you are paying attention its not clear that putting in your code will enable it to do the update, you have to press another button to stop this madness.

    and on my machine at work - continunal messages sat in the top right over updates, with no other option than 'remind me tomorrow'- how about 'remind me never?'
    they are just waiting for you to accidentally click the wrong thing. or just click yes to stop getting in your way.

    its double standards. but most mac/ios users drinkt he kool aid and never hit this 'problem'

    1. Re: in other news by dugancent · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off, your off topic. This article has nothing do with Apple.

      It wrong with Apple does it and it's wrong when Microsoft does it. That said, what Microsoft is doing would be the equivalent of installing the update when you hit no/cancel in your iPad.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    2. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First off, your off topic. This article has nothing do with Apple.

      He's commenting on the heavy, biased, and relative over-reporting of the Microsoft windows 10 upgrade push issue while any one else who does it is given a free pass.

      Apple is just an example.My mom's ipad nags her to upgrade every single day. Where are the stories that apple is pushing unwanted upgrades with no way to shut them off?

      It wrong with Apple does it and it's wrong when Microsoft does it.

      Quite. But it's apparently only newsworthy when Microsoft does it?

      That said, what Microsoft is doing would be the equivalent of installing the update when you hit no/cancel in your iPad.

      Its really not.

      Suppose Adobe flash pops up and says it will complete the flash upgrade install when you reboot your PC. with a single button that says: "OK"

      Clicking the window corner close-window "X" or even hitting "Alt-F4"... only an idiot would think these actions some how would ever "Cancel" the flash upgrade next time it the computer reboots. That's not how it works, and everybody with half a brain knows that's not how it works. Expecting doing that to cancel windows 10 upgrade is just... silly. Spilling a bunch of ink over it is even sillier.

      Complain rightfully that Microsoft is being aggressive, belligerent, and ought to stop, or even be sanctioned... but there's no reason to imagine nonsense about the X button, which is doing exactly what its always done: dismiss the window. Whether or not it cancels the action... some times it does, other times it doesn't...it depends. You can't assume it's cancelled and there are countless examples where dismissing a notification window doesn't cancel...

      Here's another... If outlook pops up a window saying you have a meeting in an hour, and you click the 'x' in the corner, or alt-f4 outlook... it doesn't cancel the meeting.

      All you did was dismiss the window. Spilling ink with headlines like "clicking X on outlook notifications doesn't cancel the event! waaaaahhhh!" is just silly.

    3. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but how many reports of mac users, who hit that button accidentially have you heard of? it's annoying as hell to see that notification on a work-machine everyday, but at least they don't use malware-tactics to trick you into installing those updates and you can at least disable notification-center completely.

    4. Re:in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Apple users are just bending over and are happily accepting anything that their supreme leader decides to thrust against them. Microsoft has slightly different history with treating customers than Apple, hence the backslash.

    5. Re: in other news by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Where are all these people finding iPads that nag them to update every day? We use them for testing, and I've never seen more than a message when a new version of iOS is available and then the little marker like all the other apps with available updates on the relevant screen.

      Apple certainly do some shady things in terms of trying to drive updates. They stop apps that don't favour newer iOS versions being available in the App Store. They provide no mechanism to back out of an update if it doesn't work. They should be, and sometimes actually are, criticised for these things. But I've never seen anything to suggest they harass users the way Microsoft have been recently or automatically install anything unless the user actively opts out.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    6. Re:in other news by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The iOS control panel allows you to disable automatic downloading and installation of OS updates.

      Windows does not.

      It's really that simple.

    7. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://osxdaily.com/2016/01/04...

      Option 1: Punt the iOS Update for 24 Hours

      If you take this route, get used to pressing Later and Remind Me Later repeatedly, as in 24 hours you'll be asked about it again. And 24 hours later, again. And another 24 hours later, you can go through the process yet again, until you either give in or move along with another of the options below.

      That was option 1. The other options are even more awesome.

      Option 2: delete update and avoid wifi forever.

      This deletes the available iOS update which stops the iOS update from popping up every day, however, the moment you're on a sustained wi-fi connection for a while the iOS update will download itself again automatically and start sending pop-ups to install it again.

      Option 3: Accept the update.

      Avoid the upgrade reminders by accepting the update. yay solution!

      Option 4: Block the update domains on your firewall.

      Of course this means blocking all updates for all apple devices on the LAN... and only works while you are at home; so hardly a solution at all really.

      This is just as shite as Microsoft, if not worse.

    8. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are the stories that apple is pushing unwanted upgrades with no way to shut them off?

      Many Apple users select Apple, often at a higher price, because of Apple hand holding so probably don't find this to be a problem. On the other hand, many Windows users are not comfortable with that approach and some have avoided Apple just because they don't like the historically limited options and "walled garden" effect, at least for their general purpose PCs.

      Here's another... If outlook pops up a window saying you have a meeting in an hour, and you click the 'x' in the corner, or alt-f4 outlook... it doesn't cancel the meeting.

      Correct - but it does absolutely nothing except dismiss the notification, it doesn't cancel the meeting, it doesn't reschedule the meeting, it doesn't cause your entire calendar to be purged of "past meetings" because obviously you don't want a historical record of past meetings, it doesn't upgrade Outlook client to a new version. In other words, it does just about the absolute minimum it CAN do while still dismissing the prompt.

    9. Re: in other news by Golden_Rider · · Score: 0

      Complain rightfully that Microsoft is being aggressive, belligerent, and ought to stop, or even be sanctioned... but there's no reason to imagine nonsense about the X button, which is doing exactly what its always done: dismiss the window. Whether or not it cancels the action... some times it does, other times it doesn't...it depends. You can't assume it's cancelled and there are countless examples where dismissing a notification window doesn't cancel...

      What's more, the notification windows says right in the middle "CLICK HERE TO CHANGE SCHEDULE OR CANCEL THE UPGRADE": http://core0.staticworld.net/i...
      So why do people who do not want the upgrade actually read the text and click there? Are they just mindlessly X-ing everything away?

    10. Re:in other news by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

      I know they're not perfect, but the majority of Apple updates just work and don't revamp the complete user experience.
      There are two parts to this problem:
      * Aggressive updates that almost try to trick you (Apple at least doesn't do the tricking part)
      * Updates that break things

      --
      It's turtles all the way down.
    11. Re: in other news by Incadenza · · Score: 2

      What's more, the notification windows says right in the middle "CLICK HERE TO CHANGE SCHEDULE OR CANCEL THE UPGRADE": http://core0.staticworld.net/i... So why do people who do not want the upgrade actually read the text and click there? Are they just mindlessly X-ing everything away?

      People don't read the page, the scan the page. Do a test with a group of people and an eye tracker, and they will probably see this on average:
      1. Windows 10 is recommended upgrade for this PC (“I'd rather not”)
      2. Sunday, May 22, 11:00 PM (“Certainly not! Bugger off”)
      3. OK (“No, it's not OK”)
      4. Upgrade Now (“FU! Where's the other option ?????”)
      5. X (“That's want I want: CANCEL the incestuous bastard”)

    12. Re:in other news by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      Never saw anything remotely like this on OSX. Don't have iPhone. Android updates, but you're notified clearly, never tricked, and you can defer it.

    13. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you direct me to that option? I can't find anything close on iOS 9.2.1 and have been bugged twice a day about upgrading.

      Under settings, general, software update- it only has install now and more info.
      Nothing else mentions updates anywhere I can see.

      It's not that I don't want to update, it's that I've been in the hospital for the last two months with another month at least to go, and this device is my only lifeline to my family and friends.
      Also I'm on their crappy wifi that drops all the time (it just did mid typing the last paragraph no less) and simply can't risk an update right now.
      USB teathering isn't an option if anything went wrong.

      Please please tell me where to find this setting!

    14. Re: in other news by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      You can always decline the update and the phone will respect your choice, but I seem to be wrong about the ability to disable automatic downloading of the updates.

      Some people say that you can go to Settings -> iTunes & App Store, scroll down to 'Automatic Downloads', and turn off the Updates switch, but others say that doesn't apply to iOS updates, just apps.

      So, Apple doesn't appear to give users the option to disable update prompts altogether. Which I agree is unacceptable, even though an iOS version update is nowhere near as hazardous as a Windows version update.

    15. Re: in other news by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      When something pops up you might be in the middle of typing something, such that you press a couple more keys out of inertia before you've fully registered the popup... I've had that happen on many occasion and it's extremely annoying...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    16. Re:in other news by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      OSX only offers to auto install minor updates, to update to a newer version of OSX you have to go into the app store and manually choose to download it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    17. Re: in other news by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Which I agree is unacceptable, even though an iOS version update is nowhere near as hazardous as a Windows version update.

      Uh...

    18. Re: in other news by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 0

      That's pretty small potatoes compared to what migrating mission-critical systems to an unsupported version of Windows would do around here.

    19. Re:in other news by macs4all · · Score: 0

      nobody attacks apple for agressivly pushing their updates.

      You must be new here.

      On my ipad almost every time i pick it up there is a screen about an IOS update. i say 'sod off' and it takes me to my lock screen code page. unless you are paying attention its not clear that putting in your code will enable it to do the update, you have to press another button to stop this madness.

      Liar. I sit here typing this on my iPad 2, running iOS 7. It is eligible for iOS 9.2.3 (or whatever the most recent rev. Is); bit I don't CHOOSE to upgrade. About once every few weeks, I see a REMINDER that the new version of iOS is ready for download. I DISMISS the Dialog by clicking "Not Now" or whatever, and THAT IS THE END OF THAT.

      and on my machine at work - continunal messages sat in the top right over updates, with no other option than 'remind me tomorrow'- how about 'remind me never?'

      I get ONE message per day, max. And you can make them go away forever like this. I found that in 5 seconds on Google. Why couldn't you?

      Now go away, asshole.

    20. Re: in other news by macs4all · · Score: 0

      http://osxdaily.com/2016/01/04...

      Option 1: Punt the iOS Update for 24 Hours

      If you take this route, get used to pressing Later and Remind Me Later repeatedly, as in 24 hours you'll be asked about it again. And 24 hours later, again. And another 24 hours later, you can go through the process yet again, until you either give in or move along with another of the options below.

      That was option 1. The other options are even more awesome.

      Option 2: delete update and avoid wifi forever.

      This deletes the available iOS update which stops the iOS update from popping up every day, however, the moment you're on a sustained wi-fi connection for a while the iOS update will download itself again automatically and start sending pop-ups to install it again.

      Option 3: Accept the update.

      Avoid the upgrade reminders by accepting the update. yay solution!

      Option 4: Block the update domains on your firewall.

      Of course this means blocking all updates for all apple devices on the LAN... and only works while you are at home; so hardly a solution at all really.

      This is just as shite as Microsoft, if not worse.

      You are a liar. Period.

    21. Re: in other news by sphealey · · Score: 2

      Which action gave Microsoft permission to install the forced upgrade?

      sPh

    22. Re: in other news by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      Years and years of scummy, shady web-based malware pop-up windows with fake "Yes" and "No" buttons that do the same thing have conditioned many users to opt for the "close windows" X button as a more fool-proof way to ensure that nothing happens.

      But as others have pointed out it's too late by the time this window appears, and they don't believe the only real solution, hitting the "cancel update" button will work.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    23. Re:in other news by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Most Apple users are just bending over and are happily accepting anything that their supreme leader decides to thrust against them. Microsoft has slightly different history with treating customers than Apple, hence the backslash.

      That must be the reason my iPad 2 runs OS X 7, my MacBook Pro runs OS X 10.9, and until I DECIDED to upgrade my iPhone 6 plus last week, it was running iOS 8.4, the version it came with.

    24. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Which part is the lie "macs4all" ?

      The part where I know family members who have to cancel their unwanted ios update every single day? Or the part where I sourced that article that shows that 4 ridiculous workarounds?

      At least there are easy 3rd party apps one can use with windows to shut it up, or one can turn off windows updates entirely.

      Neither is an option with ios.

    25. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Yes, that is quite annoying. It happens a lot less often in windows 10 with the improvements to the notification area that doesn't steal the focus when notifications popup.

      Its one of the (many) actual improvements in Windows 10.*

      If Microsoft would pull its head out of its ass and let 10 sell it self it would. All the negative word of mouth about 10 are connected to the telemetry being forced on, and the windows updates from 7/8 being obnoxious.

    26. Re: in other news by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Is this some weird thing that phone companies can turn on or something? That article is several months old, but I have never seen anything like that behaviour on the test iPad I have here.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    27. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple shill spotted.

    28. Re:in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Apple crowd seem to more or less accept the "lets make it slow so they buy a new one" upgrades Apple pushes out to older iDevices. And at least Microsoft offers a rollback period. Upgrade your iDevice, and there's no going back.

    29. Re:in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now go away, asshole.

      Why don't you fuck off? You're just an obvious Apple shill who can't deal with facts. I mean, people here are posting links to Apple-related sites that I'm sure you visit whenever you're jerking off to Tim Cook. But you just won't accept anything that makes Apple look bad, and just make shit up and attack anyone who says anything bad about your precious Apple. Seriously, just make the world a better place and kill yourself.

    30. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent anon again.

      Drat, I just went to check the iTunes and App Store section to give that option a try.
      Apparently I already disabled all four options there (music, apps, books, and updates) so can confirm that hasn't changed os updates.

      Also worth noting is the 'updates' line uses the same icon as the App Store app.
      Although other than the number in the App Store badge circle updating correctly, I can confirm it hasn't auto updates any of the 3 apps I have with updates pending.

      You are correct that you can dismiss the update dialog. "later" is the second button text, under "update", which sure is pretty direct and obvious. No confusion there.

      I'm kinda guessing on the time frame but it seems once I unlock the phone in the morning it prompts, then there's no more reminders for seemingly 24 hours, until I unlock it again the next morning. But I'm gut-feeling-guessing on that time frame, I haven't paid much attention or measured of course.

      I fully agree there is no trickery or confusion BS like in Windows, and certainly wouldn't trade the behavior with it!

      But that certainly is unfortunate about the lack of disabling the update dialog when needed.
      I suppose apple didn't want to repeat googles mistake with android and the carriers not pushing updates at all. I suppose I can even agree with that choice to a point.
      I fully admit my specific case is both rare and far from normal for iPhone users.

    31. Re: in other news by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Which action gave Microsoft permission to install the forced upgrade?

      I can't speak for everyone, but I can say with surety that Microsoft asked me for my permission to install Windows 10. They asked me fairly early, so it was before the full extent of telemetry was well-known, and I said yes. I am still running Windows 7; I cancelled the process, then went on to hide updates, and use GWX Control Panel to "make sure" that something Microsoft does in the future doesn't bring it back. I've also used this thread to compile a batch to remove the offensive updates (telemetry, windows 10 related, etc) which I would paste here if allowed. But it isn't. It's not a difficult exercise anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re: in other news by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All the negative word of mouth about 10 are connected to the telemetry being forced on, and the windows updates from 7/8 being obnoxious.

      don't forget the typical lack of drivers. all of my hardware is pretty recent (except my printer, which speaks PCL and PS) so I suspect it would all work OK, but telemetry is a non-starter. But a lot of people are having driver problems of the usual sort that tends to accompany a new windows version. really the only time that hasn't been true has been win2k->winxp, and vista->win7... for obvious reasons. Every other windows upgrade is accompanied by the sound of pocketbooks emptying as people buy new printers, multifunction devices, and scanners in particular. A while later, they show up at a flea market or yard sale for a few bucks, and then I use them with Linux.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re: in other news by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That said, what Microsoft is doing would be the equivalent of installing the update when you hit no/cancel in your iPad.

      Interestingly enough what happens when you hit no / cancel, and then you have a problem with your iPad? Take it to either the genius bar, get a warranty replacement, or do a factory restore using iTunes and then tell me how much of a "choice" you have staying with the OS version of your choice.

      Though I do agree there's an order of magnitude difference between forcing an update on a PC which may have all sorts of critical use cases, and forcing an update on a toy.

    34. Re:in other news by Zumbs · · Score: 2

      Liar. I sit here typing this on my iPad 2, running iOS 7. It is eligible for iOS 9.2.3 (or whatever the most recent rev. Is); bit I don't CHOOSE to upgrade. About once every few weeks, I see a REMINDER that the new version of iOS is ready for download. I DISMISS the Dialog by clicking "Not Now" or whatever, and THAT IS THE END OF THAT.

      I have an iPad Pro 9.7 running iOS 9.3.1, and *every* day I get a reminder for upgrading to iOS 9.3.2, even though it has been pulled for that particular model due to a nasty bricking bug. When I press select the option to postpone the installation, I get sent to a login screen with a very well hidden "press here to cancel update" link. You really ought to do your research before throwing around words like liar and asshole.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    35. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its one of the (many) actual improvements in Windows 10."

      That's complete made-up bullshit. There have been no changes in this area. Standard balloon notifications never stole focus, not even in XP.

      Of course, the window we're talking about here isn't one of those, it's the custom GWX window. If you're a very cynical person, you might indeed say that you'll get that one less in 10. Unless you use the GWX Control Panel, in which case there's no difference.

    36. Re:in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple users knew what they got themselves into. But Windows used to be the turf of those for whom the PC is a personal computer, a thing they own and control and that listens to the user. So while for Apple users it's business as usual, for Windows users it's a real cold shower. Combine that with the fact that many users who have done the upgrade to Windows 10 experience it as a downgrade, and you shouldn't be surprised there's a lot of grief to go around.
      Microsoft has changed. A lot. And yes, there have been aspects of Microsoft that have always been horrible, and they've been reported on /. since time immemorial, but the old Microsoft did tend to put their users first. And that Microsoft is dead and we're just waking up to that.

    37. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird, I have the same ipad model and the same iOS version. I only get two dialog Windows after unlocking the system.

      One says "upgrade" and "later", and after hitting later the second dialog says "upgrade now" and "remind me later"
      Hitting remind me later sure enough dismisses the dialog until the next day.

      Yes it's annoying as fuck there is not a "no" or "no, and fuck off" option, but is "later" and "remind me tomorrow" really as confusing to you as you claim?
      Also neither of those boxes are hidden, in fact they are right in your face plain as day.

      Again yes it it annoying as hell and shouldn't bug us every day. But anyone confused by what the words "install now" mean are going to be a thousand times worse off under Windows where there is no dialog and no "yes"/"no" dialog what so ever involved in upgrading to Windows 10.
      Opening any control panels on Windows would just be impossibly beyond their capabilities.

    38. Re:in other news by bn-7bc · · Score: 0

      So you hav a phone that have known exploits and a laptop that had known exploits for a long time, hmm I don't know if that was smart. ps: I am reffering to os level exploits just to make that clear

    39. Re: in other news by Megane · · Score: 1

      People who put web links (or web-style links) on the word "here" should be drawn and quartered. There's also very bad contrast between one word in dark blue next to the rest of the words in black on a white background, making it hard to even see that it's a link, not to mention that the word "here" isn't underlined, further reducing its visibility as an active UI element, to the point where one might suspect that it was made intentionally hard to see.

      3GB+ file download. Internet access fees may apply."

      Thanks Microsoft, for going ahead and downloading it for everyone anyhow! My experience was that the thing dumped 6.5 GB in a hidden folder with fucked up access permissions (so you couldn't delete it even as Administrator without doing some deep magic). Good thing I caught it in time. But I would have to admit that yes, that was in fact more than 3GB.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    40. Re: in other news by Megane · · Score: 1

      and they don't believe the only real solution, hitting the "cancel update" button will work.

      It might matter if it was actually a button. Instead, it's the word "here", in blue, without even an underline to draw attention to it as something clickable. Having to click on the word "here" to stop a forced upgrade is much dumber than having to click on the Start menu to shut down the system.

      The only real solution is to put Windows Update on full manual mode, then ignore it. But you have to do that before the GWX update installs, or after you manually remove it.

      Well, actually, the only real solution is Linux, but that's a bit much for most people. And that brings in the whole systemd thing. Maybe BSD?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    41. Re: in other news by sociocapitalist · · Score: 3

      "Apple is just an example.My mom's ipad nags her to upgrade every single day. Where are the stories that apple is pushing unwanted upgrades with no way to shut them off?"

      I get nagged every few days to upgrade my iphone and a simple touch of the screen puts the annoying box away.

      I clicked yes once by mistake and got a confirmation box, where I clicked no.

      There was no automatic installing at random hours.
      There was no installing anyway when I clicked anywhere other than 'no'.
      When I clicked yes by mistake, a verification gave me the chance to say 'no' again.

      So no, it isn't the same thing that Windows 10 (aka Windows Shaft) has been doing to users - including my father in law the doctor who clicked on the x and had his system upgraded anyway, resulting in his medical applications no longer running.

      No, it really isn't the same thing at all.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    42. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

      No, it really isn't the same thing at all.

      On the other hand, Microsoft makes it easy to roll back to your existing version of windows after you update; good luck doing that with Apple.

    43. Re: in other news by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

      No, it really isn't the same thing at all.

      On the other hand, Microsoft makes it easy to roll back to your existing version of windows after you update; good luck doing that with Apple.

      Fair point but I still don't class it up there with surprise unstoppable upgrades of the OS.

      If Apple does go that route then I'll be screaming right along with the rest.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    44. Re: in other news by Keybounce · · Score: 1

      Kindle Fire pushed an update that broke Android File Transfer

      I have a Kindle Fire, 7in, HD. Came with OS 4.5.

      This was the first Kindle I had that could not just be hooked up to my Mac and appear as a drive. But in fairness, it was also my first kindle that was more than just a book reader.

      Still, using Android File Transfer, it could move books onto it. No problem.

      I had a chance to try out OS 5.something on the newer 6in. Decided that it wasn't worth it (this was when I was buying it -- the older generation, twice the price, 7in HD was a better buy than the cheaper, lower-quality, newer 6in). I did not like the new OS. Did not want it. And yes, that was a factor, but not the deciding factor, in getting the 7in.

      Then, OS 5 was pushed on me by force. Could not undo. Called up Amazon. Was told that it was possible to revert by doing a "restore to factory settings", to put it back the way it was, and that doing so would tell the update system not to force a re-update.

      Well, if I attempted to restore my backup from Amazon, that would force an upgrade to the newest OS.
      And attempting to revert without restoring? Still left me with the new OS.

      There's no way to go back. Heck, iOS doesn't let you go back either, but last I checked, it did not force you to upgrade if you didn't want to.

      The only good thing about the win10 upgrade is that you *CAN* go back.
      No one else lets you go back.
      More and more, everyone is forcing you to go forward whether you want to or not.

      Gee, I'm so glad I *own* what I *bought*, and people attempting to run unauthorized code on my machine are fined and/or arrested/jailed for hacking. Oh, wait ...

    45. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the window is a notification. It's not asking the user if the OS should do something or not. It's saying, "I'm scheduled to do this thing at this time due to your current update settings." That's it.

    46. Re: in other news by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      Given how much I paid for it, I expect it to "just work". When I press the "Later" button, I expect that the update gets postponed to some later time. I do not expect that it tries to start the OS update - I don't have sausage fingers. I also expect that a pulled update does not keep prompting me to update my device, and that I can find official word and updates on the home page of the manufacturer. Alas, I have to rely on 3rd party articles, referencing twitter updates from some guy.

      In W7, I can right click a particular update and select hide. Up until recently that would effectively hide the update forever. The W10 update is just crap from a user perspective, no argument there.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    47. Re: in other news by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

      Hahaha!!! Really! When Windows 10 rapes your machine it auto uninstalls quite a few programs. Programs that Micro$haft doesn't want on your machine. When you try to rollback, these programs do not get reinstalled. In some cases such as Microsoft's own Media Center, once its been removed, its been removed forever.

      --
      Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
      Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
    48. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

      it auto uninstalls quite a few programs

      Because leaving stuff that is incompatible is a good idea?

      When you try to rollback, these programs do not get reinstalled

      Oh noes. I have to reinstall CPUZ myself. Meanwhile your ios device once rolled forward... never goes back. But we're busy hating on microsoft here so we'll give that a pass.

      In some cases such as Microsoft's own Media Center, once its been removed, its been removed forever.

      That's actually interesting. Cite?
      I found several articles that discussed reinstalling Media Center after it was uninstalled; so that's possible. I didn't see anything specifically addressing the rollback from windows 10 scenario though... so as I said... Cite?

      All I could find when i tried searchingwere articles on how to get it installed and running on Windows 10... which apparently is quite easy to do...if you wanted it... which is itself sort of a weird thing for someone called msoftsucks to want... i'd think if you were using windows at all, you'd be on kodi or something.

    49. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Microsoft knows that software X doesn't work on Win10, then Microsoft should make sure that the Win10 upgrade doesn't start if software X is installed. Just uninstalling stuff is inexcusable, especially the way Microsoft went about it, where users weren't told in advance and the upgrade was for many users automatic and unavoidable.
      If you really cannot see why the way Microsoft handled it was a dick move, I hope I'll never get to meet you in person.

    50. Re: in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it really isn't the same thing at all.

      Actually it really, really is. It's shitty of both Apple and MS but Apple users are already well indoctrinated so Apple can do no wrong. Plus, as you implied in you example, most people do more "work" in Windows while iOS and OSX are more "toys". Not that you want them to break or anything but it's still much less of an issue.

    51. Re: in other news by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well that just goes to show you should research your purchases and ensure the devices you buy support standard protocols, instead of buying whatever is cheap at the time...
      My printer for instance supports Postscript, which ensures it works by default with pretty much anything. And i have a networked scanner which sends jobs via email.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  5. Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So don't call it Windows 10. Call it the largest security update ever provided.

    1. Re:Um by maugle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "hipster"
      "SJW"

      You have no idea what those terms actually mean, do you? You just heard them used in negative contexts and know people don't like being called them and, without any further research, decided to apply them to everything you don't like.
      The businesspeople complaining about this forced intrusion on their workflows are neither hipsters, nor are they SJWs.

    2. Re:Um by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      We know EXACTLY what "hipster" and "SJW" mean, so why don't you just fuck right off?

      Hey Your Majesty, watch the language! The peons are listening!

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    3. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      SJW means "someone I don't like". Same as "liberal".

    4. Re:Um by Z80a · · Score: 1

      You seem to have some issues recognizing SJWs, here lemme help you:
      This is how your typical SJW acts

      Except when they get powers, then expect 1984 tier bullshit.

    5. Re:Um by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sorry, SJW means whiny millennial's or gen-xer's trying to cash in with massive amounts of whining over first world problems on microblogging sites, and screams everything is sexist, everything is homophobic, and problematic and then screams misogyny when someone tells them that their whining is shit. Key hallmarks include: Problem glasses and aposematism. Other defining features is a strong desire to ignore real world problems, screaming that free speech is problematic/dangerous/not a right and running away when someone asks why they aren't doing something actually help disadvantaged individuals.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Um by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's all FUD.

    7. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And that long list of things you don't like is near-exhaustive, so it comes back to the answer I gave: SWJ = someone I don't like (or someone who complains about something I don't care about).

    8. Re:Um by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sorry, facts not feels determine my reality. Maybe this handy picture will help you out.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The fact is, SJW as you define it is unrelated to how others use it. That you may be the only person on the world to use it "correctly" doesn't mean that the general definition of it is useful in any way.

    10. Re:Um by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The fact is, SJW as you define it is unrelated to how others use it. That you may be the only person on the world to use it "correctly" doesn't mean that the general definition of it is useful in any way.

      No, that's not how I define it. That's how most people define it, except for those involved in social justice and are trying to reclaim the word. Which of course is falling flat on it's face. I should probably add in for future reference, SJW's also enjoy things like hashtag activism which gives them great feels, but does nothing. You can like it or not, but as a reminder SJW's made that label for themselves. Their own actions have tainted it, the normies have caught on and use the label as it should be for a group of whiny kids with no life experience and demand that the world should cater to them. Let me say that again, the reason why people use the label as such is because of their own actions.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. Read the last 1000 uses of SJW, and substitute "someone I don't like" for SJW and see if it changes the meaning at all. It won't. Rarely (if ever) is SJW used as you indicate.

  6. EU should act over forced upgrades via deception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    EU should act over forced upgrades via deception

    Just like they did with IE bundling, and now Google bundling.

    EU should take Microsoft to the cleaners for forcing W10 underhand

  7. In a possibly unrelated development by phizi0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot editors have been trained to cross-promote in every story rather than actually contributing their own thoughts.

    1. Re:In a possibly unrelated development by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdot editors have been trained to cross-promote in every story rather than actually contributing their own thoughts.

      Wow you lack humour.

    2. Re:In a possibly unrelated development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bad particularly since too much cross-promotism is a known cause for nuclear showdowns at the Pacific at noon.

  8. Retaliatory strike by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    The subs will sit off the coast of Washington, ready to fire at the next automatic update.... That's if they're not running Windows onboard.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Retaliatory strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's impossible! The Microsoft Navy(tm) has already located the subs near Hawaii through their telemetry services for the improvement of the location service, which the Chinese boats captains keep active as it sounds so polite and serving. Now the boats are facing overwhelming frequency of targeted Advertising SDK and .Net Core updates which cannot be explained, comprehended or contained. Core breach is imminent.

    2. Re:Retaliatory strike by dysmal · · Score: 1

      The subs will sit off the coast of Washington, ready to fire at the next automatic update.... That's if they're not running Windows onboard.

      Subs with Windows! What could possibly go wrong?

    3. Re:Retaliatory strike by Tooke · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    4. Re:Retaliatory strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subs with Windows! What could possibly go wrong?

      Nothing, as long as they don't open them.

  9. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by fl_litig8r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Oh, and HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate /v "DisableOSUpgrade" /t REG_DWORD /d 0x1"

    Silly rabbit, the next Windows critical security update will fix that registry error you just created.

  10. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately if TTIP takes hold, every consumer will get screwed by big business.

  11. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GWX is a quad of processes

    GWXDetector
    GWXConfigurator
    GWXUX
    GWX

    Just to be sure they screw your machine, each of these quad processes watch each others back and they update them every month to ensure it's run and on their schedule.

  12. Opting IN is pure BS and the world knows it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If people weren't such nancy pushovers this automatic "opting in" garbage would have been dealt with by the regulators already but I'm sure screwing common folks up the bum is business as usual for them.

  13. And at the end of all this hoopla, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Win 10 will dominate the Windows market, the world will move on, and Microsoft will consider defending and possibly losing a massive class action suit as merely a cost of business.

    What really needs to change across the board is the sizes of penalties in both civil and criminal suits against big companies. When the typical award is between 50 and 500 times what it is today, large corporations will tread more lightly. Until then, law suits, fines, etc. are just a business expense that the C-levels have already predicted and the bean counters have factored into their projections.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by ADRA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Win 10 will dominate the Windows market"

      The real question is how much will be left with such a large market of people who generally and acutely hate your product? Every miss-step MS does (and this is certainly a big one) costs MS marketshare, and given the enemic PC landscape, that's the last thing MS needs. This will just usher people toward alternatives faster.

      Ask yourself this: If given the option would you jump into bed with Redhat or Oracle. I'd choose Redhat because Oracle's got a history of being slimy money grubbing assholes. Repuation matters, and there's little these days compelling the common man from chosing them over any of their numerous competitors.

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Win 10 will dominate the Windows market, the world will move on, and Microsoft will consider defending and possibly losing a massive class action suit as merely a cost of business.

      Presumably that is their strategy. I'm not sure it's looking so good for them so far, though. We're already most of the way through the one year period for an update to Windows 10, they have been literally giving it away and actively trying to trick people into migrating, and Windows 7 still has a much larger market share. Meanwhile, Microsoft's reputation and credibility are in tatters, probably more so with the geek and professional community than anyone else.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no evidence for your claims.

    4. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I think it will take time given the situation today and the need for a change in senior management, but if Microsoft doesn't come out with a better alternative before Windows 7 support runs out at the start of 2020, it is surely gifting a huge commercial opportunity to anyone who wants to make a play for their OS markets. I don't know who that would be or what form it would take, but I can immediately think of several vaguely plausible variations, and nearly four years is a long time in IT.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repu[t]ation matters

      Oh, so that's why Trump is going to win!

    6. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hello. I'm a guy who makes purchasing decisions for a business. We're not moving to Windows 10. We are looking at alternatives and about to spend real money on some of them.

      You have no evidence for your claims.

      He does now.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is like there is no such thing as bad news. Well, there is no such thing as bad reputation.

      This is why CEOs that destroy companies keep becoming CEOs. A celebrity CEO (one who is in the news a lot because he keeps destroying companies) will increase the value of the stock of a company, because investors have heard of this famous CEO.

    8. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      large market of people who generally and acutely hate your product

      Why did you feel it necessary to drag the American Presidential election into an otherwise rational discussion?

    9. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ... Meanwhile, Microsoft's reputation and credibility are in tatters, probably more so with the geek and professional community than anyone else.

      True. But Windows is losing share on the server side really fast, so they've probably already given that one up. Might that be why they're going all Linux-y - to pave the way for officially throwing their own server OS versions under the bus in favour of MS-branded Linux? As for the rest of the enterprise, can you see IT departments migrating their entire user base to something other than Windows? In most organizations the pain and expense of that would cause heads to roll, so anybody who wants to keep their job and/or have a good reference probably won't take the 'dump Microsoft' idea beyond the bitch and moan stage. Besides, they probably see the writing on the wall - with Cloud services pervasive and growing more so, we're likely gonna end up back at the old thin client model anyway - only this time, it will stick and become ubiquitous. Then nobody will care much about the desktop OS.

      IMHO that's why we haven't seen 'the year of the Linux desktop'. Not because Linux isn't good enough, and not because Windows isn't bad enough, but because such a large-scale change is too risky for the people who would have to promote and implement it, and in a few years it's not going to matter anyway. Maybe that's where Linux will finally have a chance - as a kickass scalable, reliable thin client OS that natively does things the same way as all those servers out there.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    10. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate having to say it, as I've been building and supporting Windows units since Win 3.1 but for my business customers? We're looking into Chromebooks with the Windows 7 units being kept for legacy applications and to run hardware that won't work anywhere else, just like I have several XP units out there running legacy devices like CNCs.

      The reasons why are simple...they are cheap, easy to manage, and for basic office work? They have more than enough power to do the job. You can manage everything locally with Google for business and if one dies who cares? Just whip out another one from the back and they are right back where they were in a couple minutes like nothing ever happened.

      MSFT is really really fucking themselves HARD with Windows 10 as they forgot the golden rule...silly rabbit, Windows is for business. They forgot those millions of small businesses are their bread and butter and by keeping control of all their phone home shit strictly for Enterprise which most of them cannot afford? They just made the competition look a HELL of a lot more attractive. Even my gamer customers are asking me about alternative like Linux and SteamOS and just keeping a Windows partition for the games that won't run as even they really don't like Windows 10. its buggy as hell, as likely to crap itself on update as a bleeding edge Linux distro, has lousy backwards compatibility and piss poor driver support.....its just not a good OS.

      My guess is by 2020 Nutella will go the way of Ballmernator, they only question is whether there will be enough customers left who give a shit for the next guy to try to save the company. What they SHOULD have done is backported both DX12 and the Windows Store and made selling add-on services and features a big money maker, with their massive server network and bandwidth they could get ahead of the curve with services like Internet TV and selling online game hosting services but they went from being a bad Apple rip-off with Ballmer to being a bad Google rip-off with extra spying and Bing! with Nutella...sigh. How they went from making something as good as win 7 to such a giant fuckup of a company is beyond me.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Braintrust · · Score: 1

      Outside of enterprise, my opinion is that that the only reason Windows as a platform exists at all in 2016, is gaming.

      Legacy enterprise and legacy gaming keep Windows on many millions of machines, I think.

      If I could port my gaming collection completely over to Linux tomorrow without resorting to an online (Steam) solution to do so, today would be my last day having anything to do with Windows and Microsoft.

      I know Dosbox has long had Linux support, and lots of newer games are native Linux, but there's a vast grey area there that spans about 15 years of gaming, and that grey area keeps me tethered to Windows in part for the time-being.

      If you substitute the word 'enterprise' for the word 'gaming' in the previous paragraph, you also cover another huge chunk of what keeps Microsoft in business against all better judgement.

      Addendum: Apple and Google and Facebook and all the other data-mining, walled-garden monopolies are just as bad if not worse in how they conduct themselves.

      I miss the open internet a lot.

      --
      Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    12. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by dwywit · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer to see the penalties include a refund of the cost to undo the damage:

      1. Revert Win10, or, when that doesn't work
      2. Format and re-install Win7/8/8.1
      3. Refund the cost of any hardware borked
      4. Refund the cost of software re-installation
      And most important
      5. Compensation for loss of business/income, say, actual plus 10x as a penalty and disincentive to do it again.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    13. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by dwywit · · Score: 1

      S'funny - there's an article further down about the latest release of OS/2.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    14. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by dwywit · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of Adobe Creative Suite users out there, and Adobe doesn't have much motivation to port it to GNU/Linux, although it's available on OSX - it shouldn't take much effort, but the market is just too small, at least initially.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    15. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Braintrust · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --
      Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    16. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mythical company whose productivity you are about to destroy with your pretend power would real life fire the shit out of you.

    17. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      That you, Ballmer? Don't you have a basketball team to ru(i)n?

    18. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they'll promote him because he made a wise decision that saved the company lots of money and kept spyware off of their systems.

    19. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      That is odd, because I know two very large companies are in the midst of rolling out Windows 10, as well my the company I am currently consulting for. As for gamers, well according to steam, Windows 10 passed by Windows 7/8/8.1 long ago.

      http://store.steampowered.com/...

    20. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I think they believe that there will not be a separate desktop market so they are sacrificing what they have now to further their interests in other markets. Based on the results, it is not working.

    21. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      In my libertarian dictatorship, wholesale liquidation of corporations for serious criminal fraud would be the norm. For a very few instances. Then no more.

    22. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Trogre · · Score: 2

      I've found old Windows XP laptops make great Linux+XFCE notebooks for my customers. Just throw a cheap SSD in them, maybe replace the battery if needed, and they're much faster than they ever were when new.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    23. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I have a few friends who also run their own businesses or are senior enough in someone else's to make IT purchasing decisions. That kind of thing happens when you've been working for a decade or two. Still, as long as all of us are only pretending to have power and our businesses are all mythical, Microsoft has nothing to worry about, right?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    24. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      You must be looking at different Steam stats to the ones you linked to. Those show Windows 10 at around 40% market penetration, almost exactly the same as Windows 7, with 8.1 at around 12% and everything else lost in the noise.

      I'm curious to know which very large companies are already rolling out Windows 10, if you're free to name them. So far I haven't encountered any in my own work, but most of the clients I deal with are at the smaller end of the scale.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    25. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's where Linux will finally have a chance - as a kickass scalable, reliable thin client OS that natively does things the same way as all those servers out there.

      The merged product of Android and Chrome OS fits this bill pretty nicely. Chromebooks are already displacing iPads in the educational sector. Can the business sector be far behind? If Google comes out with private-cloud version of its Apps platform, then that provides another nail in Microsoft's coffin. One might argue that we're trading one oligopolist for another, but hasn't that always been the case?

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    26. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      As for the rest of the enterprise, can you see IT departments migrating their entire user base to something other than Windows?

      I already have, but then I mostly work with smaller businesses rather than big "enterprise" clients. In the smaller organisations, IME, there's generally much less tolerance for the kind of shenanigans Microsoft has been pulling lately, and often more willingness to make significant changes if the alternatives look better. I've seen things like dumping MS Office entirely (in favour of cloud-hosted equivalents) and dumping Windows almost entirely (in favour of Apple laptops) with generally positive responses.

      I suspect you're right about trending back towards thin clients, at least for the short to medium term. In a sense we have already been doing that for a few years with mobile apps as front ends to remote services, but it seems that for many businesses, web apps and cloud hosting generally have also won for now, despite the various downsides. I'm not as sure as you are that the thin client model will stick: I think those downsides will become too significant to ignore after a while and business users will look to regain control. The irony is that the one business that could potentially have led the industry on a short-cut to that end result was Microsoft, and it would probably have been huge for them, but once again they tried to follow another trend five years too late instead and now they've blown it.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    27. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to those numbers, Windows 10 and Windows 7 are very nearly even. Windows 7 is ahead with 39.54%, while Windows 10 is almost tied with 39.51%.

      The only reason "Windows 10 64 bit" is listed as the most popular is because 64-bit and 32-bit installs are split up into separate entries, and Windows 10 has a much higher percentage of 64-bit installs. (Of course, anyone who actually took a moment to think about the numbers would have already realized this.)

      I won't be surprised to see Windows 10 ahead of Windows 7 sometime soon, but it doesn't seem that it's happened yet.

    28. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Linux users are the type that, if they pay for software, would usually prefer to do so once rather than buy a cloud subscription. And they already have had the opportunity to download the backup, offline version (CS2) since Adobe posted the serials publicly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      there were adobe tools (pshop?) for sgi irix, but that was a special case.

      irix emulation for linux, funny thought.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    30. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penalties

      Penalties should be something invaluable. Something that cannot be compensated with any amount of money.

      Ideas. Invalidate some of their key patents and make the ideas free for all to use, unpatentable.
      Time. Put their major shareholders to prison. Money can buy time, but it will never bring back lost years.

    31. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been running Windows 10 on a 2007 PC (Core2Duo, pretty ancient hardware) and a 5 year old Dell. No driver issues or bugs to speak of, runs great. Hope someone mods this up as the other side of the coin.

    32. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Businesses will continue to use microsoft so the market will continue to be dominated by microsoft. There really is no alternative for the masses as they are barely able to use windows and it has full support from hardware manufacturers. I use linux for the most part but I've been using computers since 1982 before the world of the GUI began on the desktop. I've moved several coworkers to Macs but as aircraft mechanics they make good money and can splurge on such things. Without fail all the ones that moved to Macs are overwhelmingly happy with the change but given the high costs I doubt Macs will ever be more than 10 percent of the market and Apple seems okay with that. Being a premium brand is very profitable. I used to hope for a linux desktop conquest but I think it'll remain a geek niche and I've come to accept that as well.

    33. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      They also killed SBS, with the last usable option being 2011. So, there we sit, on SBS 2011 until I can port the functionality over to a linux box.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    34. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know several large companies who are doing there best to keep on Win7 to avoid the issues of Win10. One company dipped their toe into the Win8 fiasco and migrated back to Win7

    35. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great - while you make (and later regret) that decision Microsoft is offering a free update, take the damn thing. Windows 7 EOL is 4 years. Are you one of those weirdos that like Vista?

    36. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      As you apparently know, Windows 7 has support until the early 2020. That is a long time before we need to make any big decisions, and we expect the Windows 10 fiasco to be ancient history by then one way or another.

      In some cases we couldn't use the free Windows 10 update even if we did want to, because we'd have immediate compliance issues as soon as we didn't have full control of systems that handle sensitive data, which no version of Windows 10 available via the free update offers.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    37. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer to see the penalties include:

      1. The capture of all the Microsoft C-level executives and their families.
      2. Having the executives strapped to chairs, and forced to watch as their spouses are raped to death.
      3. The executives are then dragged outside to view their children fed into the guillotines and their wee little heads stuck on pikes.
      4. The executives are then slowly impaled on fire-hot steel shafts while also having their hearts slowly sawed from their chests.

      But then I might have been watching Game of Thrones a bit too much lately.

    38. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The class action lawsuit settlement will be free copies of windows 10 for the damaged parties.

    39. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      Same experience, except that the 'upgrade' to Win10 silently discards a random selection of (mostly old) programs you might well be using daily. And they almost all work if you can reinstall them. What's going on?

    40. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How they went from making something as good as win 7 to such a giant fuckup of a company is beyond me.

      I easily understand how:

      -- About the time Win 7 came out, Microsoft realized that their competitors' focus on free offerings was creating a major earthquake in the market.

      -- They realized that Win 10 needed to be "basically free" in order to compete.

      -- They needed to replace that lost Win 10 revenue. The only feasible way to do it was to emulate their competitors: online stores, advertising, and selling users' private information.

      -- Therefore: Telemetry, mandatory upgrades, a "Windows Store" button on the start menu, etc.

      The market forced Microsoft where to go. Whether the resulting OS is "good" or not is irrelevant. They simply did what they had to do, given the new market realities.

      My only surprise with Win 10 is that it happened as soon as it did. I thought Microsoft valued its business customers enough to give them one more "good" OS after Win 7, but they clearly ran out of time and couldn't do it.

    41. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget one thing Chromebooks also leaks information and phones home with all you goodies. EVERYTHING you do on a Chromebook is logged, trapped, and traced. MS got their idea of copying and selling your information and your psychological profile to third parties FROM Google. Chromebooks may run better but your still giving away your data and everything about you.

      No security here either.

    42. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you mean. The stats clearly show that the #1 version of Windows installed is Windows 10 (64-bit), which is what I said -- at 40.01%. The next closest is Windows 7 (64-bit) at 34.09%, and then Windows 8.1 (64-bit) at 12.46%.

      As for which very large companies are already rolling out Windows 10, I don't think I should. I'm not sure if they care if others know or not, but I'm not wanting to find out from their legal departments that they do. I could say that one of them is one of the largest advertising agencies in the world, and other is a state government agency.

    43. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious reason for that would be that most computers are preloaded with Windows 10. Just like Windows 8 got 'accepted' because anybody who bought a PC/laptop automatically got Windows 8, and would have had to actively downgrade to Windows 7. Most people buying new computers have their choices made up already for them

    44. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how come Carly Fiorina - the celebrated Veep nominee for Ted Cruz - didn't get another job since her stint at HP?

  14. It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 5, Informative

    Create a blank .reg file and put this in it

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Gwx]
    "DisableGwx"=dword:00000001

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate]
    "DisableOSUpgrade"=dword:00000001

    Then run it, alternative manually add those keys to the registry yourself.

    Yes, I know this isn't exactly user friendly and NO it shouldn't be necessary but it works all the time, every time.

    It's even documented on the Microsoft website, go on have a look : https://support.microsoft.com/...

    Why this is STILL not common knowledge I don't know. All you get from everyone is bitching how "Microsoft shouldn't be doing this" and "how dare they have the gall to do this". If EVERYONE on Slashdot put some effort in to spreading the word about this pretty simple fix, then a LOT of people would not end up with Windows 10 when they don't want it.

    Hey maybe Slashdot could run a quick piece on it? Perhaps spread the word to some mainstream press with a link to a reg file hosted by someone trustworthy.

    Alternatively let's all just keep rehashing the same fucking discussions about how "update KBwhatever" keeps coming back when hiding that has never been they way to fix this problem.

    1. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the info.

      I did enjoy the daily wack-a-mole mini-game in Windows 7 though :)

    2. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      No thanks required, just share the wealth.

    3. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow that looks complicated. you should just install Debian, or maybe Mint.

      sounds kinda gay bitchy btw.

    4. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has pulled a huge number of dirty tricks to try and force windows 10 on people, do you really think that they wouldn't (or haven't) release an update which 'accidentally' ignores those keys, at least on people running home edition (to avoid angering the corporate customers).

    5. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I saw a post elsewhere that said:

      Activists will go out and build ramps for disabled people.
      Social justice warriors will go out and remove stairs for everyone so that the disabled person won't be offended.

      I applaud your interests in practical applications of knowledge good sir!

    6. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by michael_rendier · · Score: 1

      This is because i wasn't logged in when i posted ^^^

      --
      There are three kinds of people in the world. Those that can count, and those that can't.
    7. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 2

      Thanks for your useful suggestion. It's relevance to the topic has not gone unnoticed.

    8. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      spead the news: linux is better, switch today!

      now that's wealth.

    9. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 4, Informative

      They documented the feature in January. I have been using it since at least February on 2 machines that I use 6 days at week and always have automatic updates on and scheduled to run at 3am. Neither have been automatically upgraded to Windows 10. 1 machine is left on 24/7, the other about 9/6.

      I have used it on at least 500 customers machines and in that time exactly none of them have been automatically upgraded to 10. I would know because I told every single one of them that if they found themselves on 10 to call me and I would roll them back to 7 remotely.

      As yet none of them have called me.

      So, yes, Microsoft may well edit these keys, they're not exactly in the business of being super nice to consumers are they.

      But what's the point now? The "free Windows 10" offer ends in about 2 months. They've had at least 4 months to nix the single most effective method of stopping the Windows 10 upgrade and yet they've not bothered. They just kept people busy pointlessly blocking a windows update and the forums and comments full of geeks moaning about how Microsoft keep fucking them about.

    10. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Meh, it's not the Desktop operating system Windows is though is it? Really.

      I did Linux on the desktop for a year at home and work. It's alright, stuff eventually works but I still found myself hankering for the "I didn't even need to find a driver for it" feeling of Windows.

      Yes, I've got to fuck about with registry hacks and stuff to get it the way I like it, but is any Linux distro 100% what a user wants out of the box?

      Can you grab nearly any piece of hardware made in the last 5 year, plug it in and have it just work? Can you just buy a game, install it and play it?

      How's fitting that brand new top of the line graphics card going?

      I love Debian, I run it on 6 servers and wouldn't look anywhere else for a server operating system. It does exactly what you ask of it, no more, no less.

      For the desktop though? It's just not Windows enough.

    11. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then run it, alternative manually add those keys to the registry yourself.

      Run what, how? I'm jogging 6 miles each day, is it that?
      What 'registry' ? Where is it on my desktop?

      Wait a minute! This "DisableGwx"=dword:00000001 definitively looks like malware. Wanting my keys
      and sending strange commands, you must be a hacker! I'll send the cops right after you!!

    12. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please learn how to use paragraphs and maybe TONE DOWN THE LECTURING.

    13. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But what's the point now?

      I suppose it depends on how desperate they get as the deadline nears, particularly if they don't see a huge surge in conversions at the last minute. Even when the Get Windows 10 prompts started, I wouldn't have expected Microsoft to turn an update that installs them back on after a user actively chose to hide it. Even after they'd done that, I wouldn't have expected them to bundle promotional material into an unrelated security update. Today I don't honestly know what lines they wouldn't cross any more or if there even are any.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    14. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    15. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does not prevent the updates which retrofit the spying from Windows 10 into Windows 7.

    16. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All new Nvidia and Intel gpus are well supported, AMD will release new Linux drivers this year but don't hold your breath. BTW Debian is a toy OS use SUSE, Fedora or even Ubuntu if you want a solid well supported Linux desktop.

    17. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I don't want a solid, well supported Linux desktop.

      I want a Windows desktop. It's definitely not perfect, but at least it's not Linux on the desktop.

      I keep trying it, I always have a partition loaded up with Desktop Linux on. I regularly try out this distro or that distro.

      I always end up back in Windows, it's the path of least resistance.

    18. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, if they guy who writes a piece of software that he has to keep updating to get round Microsoft's dirty tactics says that the KB in question is re-enabling automatic upgrade to Windows 10, then who am I to argue?

      I'm just some guy on the internet.

    19. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I never said it did, but good point well made.

    20. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'll shut the fuck up now because clearly this is a solved problem. Thanks for helping.

    21. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Can you grab nearly any piece of hardware made in the last 5 year, plug it in and have it just work?

      Kinda... In fact, I'm soaking in it

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this hack doesn't disable the nagging. It just stops automatic updates, but many users will see "important free upgrade from Microsoft, it's great honest, click here" and will manually request an upgrade anyway.

      FWIW I did try Windows 10 on a system of mine and it goes to a black screen with no cursor when booting with BitLocker enabled (works fine in 8.1). Obviously can't downgrade the normal way because it has to boot for that to work. Fortunately it was a test install on a spare drive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Why not just turn off recommended updates like the latest generation of notification from MS suggests? Critical security updates will still get applied.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    24. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Isao · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or download and run Never10 from Steve Gibson. Makes the approved registry changes for you, and removes any pre-downloaded installation files you may have.

    25. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see some evidence of it not stopping the nagging, again I have nothing but anecdotal evidence of it being 100% effective but if someone has actual proof of it failing then I'll stop peddling my snake oil.

    26. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Why not just apply 2 registry keys?

      If it's as simple as "Why not..." then why is anyone still suffering this problem?

      Because any mainstream news coverage this get's is 100% negative Microsoft bashing with zero advice on how to sort it out.

    27. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Whatever works for you dude, you're preaching to the wrong congregation though.

      It's not the nerds that need to know, it's all the other people that don't want Windows 10.

    28. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

    29. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can see, people are still suffering this problem because they don't understand the directions MS keeps trying to get them to read. It seems like a lot of people don't know the difference between recommended updates and the critical updates (or "important" updates as the control panel calls them).

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    30. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      This is definitely a large part of the problem. There's not a big enough noise coming from non Microsoft related news outlets to tell people how to sort it.

      It's like geeks have discovered a cure for dirty diesel but instead of getting the word out, they're arguing about how terrible the engine manufacturers are.

    31. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Deathlizard · · Score: 0

      If you do what the parent says and reboot, the Nag is gone for good

      For the Less Technically inclined:
      https://www.grc.com/never10.ht...

      Works just as well and also cleans up space that the Win10 background download takes up.

    32. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      An apt car analogy!

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    33. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by fnj · · Score: 1

      I always end up back in Windows, it's the path of least resistance.

      Fine. Then you bloody well deserve the hell you are going to go through.

    34. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I'm yet to experience anything like what I would expect hell to be like.

      What hell am I going to go through? Educate me.

    35. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh, weird! It's almost as if Microsoft have been doing their level best for the past five years to convince users that they should conflate "critical updates" with "recommended updates"! Gee, if only we could clone you and assign all of your clones to be live-in helpers to all of the countless grandmothers, grandfathers, and other non-technical people who would be affected by this. It would be so easy!

    36. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The Never10 utility does this. Very small so easy to download.

    37. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was this not the same reason that Linux was not ready for the desktop?

    38. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even if they charge, they'll keep the ads. Though I suspect they may extend the free period.

    39. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They do all sorts of nonsense. Ie, when people in W8 preview discovered registry setting to skip the Metro start screen and boot straight to desktop, that removed that in the next update. It didn't hurt Microsoft, the vast majority of users would never have used it or known about it, and yet...

    40. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your useful suggestion. It's relevance to the topic has not gone unnoticed.

      Not the ac you responded to, just want to say I like your style. You shut him down well.

    41. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like you go to a gas station and when you put fuel in your sports car it turns into a cheap compact car.

      Well, you know all you had to do to prevent it was tweak some settings in the engine computer. Stupid people. Put some effort in.

    42. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that should have been required is the user clicks "NO". But they never really had that option. It was "now" or "later" and shit like that. Click the close button? That means yes.

      MS is like a rapist that doesn't care when you say NO.

      I didn't want it. It still downloaded twice. I was in a remote location and wondering why my internet sucked worse than usual, and why my hard drive was suddenly a lot fuller. Why should I have to track down registry settings to keep Win10 out? I should have been able to say NO and that should have been the end of it.

    43. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is exactly the platform where "I don't have to find a driver..." Any peripheral I buy these days (printer, mouse, fancy keyboard, usb wifi, ...) comes with a bundled DRIVER for some versions of windows. And I don't need that with linux, because on linux, it just works. Well, I may have to do something, but all drives come with linux, not with the thing I bought. So when I replace the computer, I won't have to go looking for old DRIVER CDs like windows people have to.

      Oh, and try to upgrade a computer with windows on it, will you? With linux, I don't have to reinstall. Buy a new motherboard, connect the old disk and power on. Or copy the entire OS onto a newer disk, then boot. Linux comes up, not worrying that it is now running on a new motherboard. Try that with windows, see if it boots at all.

    44. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this disable all Windows updates, including those one might wish to install?

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    45. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      No, just the upgrade

    46. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Okay thanks

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    47. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      I believe he is referring to you losing control over your computer. Some people like that, some don't.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    48. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen it blue-screen-loop-boot-fail a DELL machine at work, so fuck you snake oil man.

    49. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

      "Any OS that requires me to manually edit the registry is simply not ready for the mainstream"

      Or something like that.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    50. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Similar experience. I've tried many linux desktops; always too much little stuff missing or too many nuisances or WTFs, and back to Windows I go. Tho if they don't succumb to wherever KDE5 is losing its marbles (please, people, not everyone wants a fucking cellphone interface!), PCLinuxOS is pretty close.

      Some years ago during one of my periodic spasms of linux testing, Mandrake 7.2 came closest to everyday usable... and when I finally got the desktop all tweaked to my satisfaction, I was amused to discover that I'd recreated Win95.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    51. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think the real point is that Win10 isn't a desktop; it's an interface to the Windows Store. And this "Get it for free!" thing is like that furniture store that's been having its "Going out of business!" sale for the past 30 years.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    52. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, how adorable - a naive optimist!

      What's to stop MS from ruining your solution? The nasty tricks so far show how desperate they are to get everyone on their malware. What's to stop them from changing it so your reg hack doesn't work, especially as they panic when it gets closer to the deadline and still sane people aren't upgrading?

    53. Re: It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to stop them.

    54. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Would it be a problem to run both Never10 and GWX Control Panel? Who knows, some Microsoft Windows 10 update might slip thru one of those but be caught by the other one.

    55. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Sure, but GWX Control Panel should probably be updated periodically as well.

    56. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      The last piece of hardware I had to install in a Linux box (was a media server) was a DVB-T2 TV Card.

      Not only were no drivers included with Debian for it, I had to go off and grab a firmware then COMPILE my own drivers.

    57. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My point of shock was when it offered to sell me a version of Minesweeper that would not have ads.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    58. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard about that... and that it's something like a 100mb download, wtf. (Did they tweak Win10 so old Minesweeper won't run?)

      I first realised what Win10 really is when I heard (I don't know if it's true) that there's no media player included, but that you could buy one at the Windows Store for a couple bucks. Yeah, a couple bucks times half a billion users, that's already more money than you'd make selling a desktop to those who'd pay for it. Microsoft's real money has always been in Enterprise customers, but they've also always sought a method of making profit from home users (who previously have never been profitable)... well, this is it.

      It's the cellphone business model applied to a PC, and personally, I hate it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. You can avoid this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to https://tiny.cc/aegisvoat for a script which disables all of Microsoft's spying and unwanted "upgrades."

  16. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by hambone142 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to see a nasty class action lawsuit against Microsoft in this issue. Not that I like lawyers but this is a very damaging and deceptive action on Microsoft's behalf.

  17. Then don't use Windows by Atmchicago · · Score: 0, Troll

    Don't like Windows? Don't use it. Done.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Then don't use Windows by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      Don't like Windows? Don't use it. Done.

      Some of us have to. I hate the thing but I work with certain hardware/software combinations for which Windows is still the only option.

    2. Re:Then don't use Windows by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess you werent around when Microsoft was convicted of being an abusive monopoly....

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Then don't use Windows by WheezyJoe · · Score: 3, Informative

      This. Like the Hitler thing, there will always be someone who flippantly posts "just don't use windows" with a misguided air of superiority.
      So, in a futile attempt to put this to rest: if it were that easy, that's what people would do.

      But it isn't, and Microsoft knows it, and that's why they're doing what they're doing.
      If you don't rely on software that requires Windows, happy for you. If you got the spare time and the inclination, there's Linux or BSD; otherwise, Macs have become pretty damn bullet-proof turnkey solutions for getting the essentials taken care of and then some. Throw in a Playstation 4, and you've got games covered, too.

      But for the rest of us, it's a huge shit sandwich, and we're all gotta have to take a bite.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    4. Re:Then don't use Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting choice of words. Nobody went to jail, and Microsoft got around the penalty by offering it up as money off vouchers off the next version of Office and for those who were already updated for that, opt-in rebates.

  18. If only... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...this had been opt-in instead of try-repeatedly-to-opt-out, Microsoft might been able to gain lots of positive press for offering a newer, allegedly safer, somewhat spying OS for free.

    As is, with it being rammed down people's downlinks with little or no regards for the users wishes or data-caps, the angry backlash should been predicted and expected.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft might been able to gain lots of positive press

      As if Microsoft cares or needs to care. So long as they're "somewhat spying OS" can deliver ads, they've achieved their goal: turn a lot of financially burdensome Windows 7 users with auto-update into at least somewhat less financially burdensome (and potentially financially positive) Windows 10 users with auto update. It's like how people actually believe that Trump would care about being given bad press. All he cares about is winning. And Microsoft cares about is money.

    2. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Witness a method of forcing a change by utilizing the general ignorance.

      I call it blame-business. Consumers have assumed their guilt of ignorance. Using the guilt, almost any kind of change is possible. Only thing needed is a plausible but still obscure enough guide to avoid the change.

      1. The typical consumer won't do anything to help themselves.
      2. He will get hurt by the change.
      3. He will still blame himself because there was help and warnings.
      4. His loyalty to the business stays unchanged because he thinks it was his fault.
      5. Profit.

    3. Re:If only... by stooo · · Score: 0

      Actually, Microsoft is "opt-in"
      There are plenty of options to buy MS-free HW.....

      --
      aaaaaaa
  19. this happens when you trick and mislead your users by pezpunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft is assaulting its user base with features and upgrades that they don't want.

    hounding, harassing, misleading, and tricking users into doing things they don't want to do is a great way to lose even more market share and foster an even more toxic reputation that Microsoft is unscrupulous and an increasing unnecessary nuisance.

    it is hilarious to me that there are actually people here who will defend MS and even blame users for their OS being upgraded against their intentions.

    when you have to watch your own system like a hawk and protect it from multiple vectors of attack ... from the company that MADE that OS ... man, it is time to re-evaluate whether it's worth the hassle at all. amazingly, Microsoft has managed to plant that seed of thought not in rabble-rousing Linux faithful, but average joes and janes who have no desire to become security experts and update ninjas just to keep their machine from changing its operating system on them. good job MS, alienating one of your most faithful demographics.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  20. Tweak updates so they recommend/install Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that would be nice. Instead of asking then potentially forcing Windows 10 on the user, a 'special' update could be crafted to point the user(s) to a 'gentle' site explaining Linux and how to install it.

    A simple wizard could guide them through a simple questionnaire which then based on the answers generate a recommendation as to what Linux distro could be right for them, then a backup files wizard, then an install Linux distro option, based upon the results of the quiz, or let them click on any of a provided list of distros.

  21. No more security for old systems, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The support period for Windows 7 and 8 has not run out yet, so why does everyone claim that not upgrading to Windows 10 will leave open machines for attack? Does Microsoft plan to not put out any more security updates for older systems or is this fear mongering to draw more people to Windows 10?

    Both would be bad.

  22. Class action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm personally hoping for a major class action lawsuit in the US. There's no denying that Microsoft's tricks are shady, even if not illegal, and the whole thing stinks of abuse. Forced obsolescence is one thing, but tricking and forcing your customers into switching to a fundamentally different product with remote telemetry and backdoors is absolutely despicable, even if it is bug-free and perfectly compatible. Which of course it isn't.

    I don't know if there is any legal basis whatsoever for an actual suit, but I still hope. And I hope customers and major clients leave Microsoft in droves over this. Fuck Microsoft.

  23. I'm making money off it. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am installing GRC's never10 at an alarming rate. I have had to make at least $1600 in the last week alone charging $25.00 for the 10 minutes it takes to install it on their personal computers..

    Thank you once again Microsoft for making the IT guys job more relevant than ever, at this rate I'll be able to afford a vacation home by fall.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO that's a little fucked up.

      Why not use the same energy just to install linux and some familiar programs like Firefox?

    2. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the most horrible things I've ever heard. Pirate scum!

      Seriously, those people are going to be pissed when you charge them again for the upgrade they should have already installed for free.

    3. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the F is your TLA mean?
      GRC? Goddam raunchy canadian?

    4. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously know nothing at all about linux. Please show me a distro that takes 10 minutes to get installed and functional with the users data and software intact and running.

      Oh wait.... NONE.

    5. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you learn what the internet is for and google it?

      Oh wait, I'm sorry, we all forgot here that you dont know how to use a computer....

    6. Re:I'm making money off it. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Because outside of office work and servers, Linux is SHIT. Linux actually makes my hardware LESS valuable because i lose so much performance. I love Linux, been on the train since the 90s. When SteamOS came out i built 3 different machines (good, better, best based on Valve's specs). Best and Better are now Win 10 machines and Good is in a closet somewhere. Im wearing a damn TF2/Linux Tshirt right now, but for entertainment on x86, its garbage.

      --
      Good-bye
    7. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could take days to build a productive Windows environment from scratch, unless it's already imagined.

    8. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lumpy isn't the only one. A few people have paid me to block Windows 10 "upgrades". Of course I first discuss the pros and cons with them, even when they explicitly ask me to block the upgrade. It's not a long talk: "free upgrade now" vs. "some of their hardware stops working and they need to pay for expensive updates to critical software packages".

    9. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if I had to play retarded clones of Solitaire and the snake maze game(s). I would NOT reward M$ for DirectX and that's what people are doing by using Windows for gaming.

      BTW, if some !@@#$%^ came to my grandparents and charged them for installing a little tool like Never10....

    10. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because outside of office work and servers, Linux is SHIT. Linux actually makes my hardware LESS valuable because i lose so much performance. I love Linux, been on the train since the 90s. When SteamOS came out i built 3 different machines (good, better, best based on Valve's specs). Best and Better are now Win 10 machines and Good is in a closet somewhere. Im wearing a damn TF2/Linux Tshirt right now, but for entertainment on x86, its garbage.

      This has never really been surprising though. Linux is a tool, Windows is a toy.

    11. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has never really been surprising though. Linux is a tool, Windows is a toy.

      Really? Go into any substantial industrial automation setting, graphic arts studio, music production studio, or general business and let me know how many machines are running Linux.

    12. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that. You are the plover of the IT world. You may survive but essentially you are worthless and contribute nothing. When tides shift you will be fucked in to a hole you can no escape and no one will care.

    13. Re:I'm making money off it. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't care if I had to play retarded clones of Solitaire and the snake maze game(s). I would NOT reward M$ for DirectX and that's what people are doing by using Windows for gaming.

      If you want to play more than a handful of AAA titles, your choices are Microsoft, Microsoft again, or Sony. You know it's sad, but true. The situation is improving, but it is improving slowly. It's got four years to improve sufficiently that I don't need Windows. The only question then will be whether I'll be able to run Steam without systemd...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:I'm making money off it. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I would NOT reward M$ for DirectX

      Why not? It seems to be one of their most solid and well performing APIs.

    15. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, Windows is an OS for entertainment, for gaming. A toy.

      Years ago it was the OS for work. Not anymore. I guess enough meetings got disrupted by the update notifications and forced reboots.

    16. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the 45 year old 425 pound blob that lives in his mom's basement.

    17. Re:I'm making money off it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because all they wanted was to keep the OS they already purchased?

  24. That only works until Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    adds a workaround. I did a couple of different registry tricks, but I still ended up with 10 on my 7 desktop this week without my permission.

    1. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 0

      I've had this in use on machines in daily use with automatic updates turned on at work since at least February and have used it on 500+ customers machines.

      Weird how none of them have automatically ended up with 10, but somehow yours did.

      The mind literally boggles.

    2. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Not the GP poster here.

      Could the difference be that your 500 machines are linked to a domain, while the GP's single machine is stand-alone?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Microsoft will just find a way around it and eventually force an upgrade. GWX worked for me for a while, but Thursday I forgot to put my laptop to sleep and Friday morning it was stuck in a reboot loop after installing 10. Haven't been able to fix it since Dell sent the wrong install media when I bought it new.

    4. Re: That only works until Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft isn't forcing the upgrade on machines connected to a domain. Also, they're not allowing upgrades from Enterprise edition. You're experience has nothing to do with a home user.

    5. Re: That only works until Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I kept up with all of the advice on how to not be forced to upgrade, and I still got hit this week while I'm out of town and over 2,000 miles from my backup drive.

    6. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 2

      No. I run a "mom n pop" computer shop with 3 engineers that averages about 70 repairs from the general public in a 5 day week.

      We also probably get about 10 a week from a company that gives support on machines they lease.

      We're by no means huge, but we see enough customers who have not long made the jump from XP to 7 who don't want to move to 10.

      My story is purely anecdotal and definitely not scientific. But when I see apparently knowledgeable people saying they can't keep 10 off their machines whatever they do, it makes me wonder if they have an agenda with what they're saying.

      Full disclosure : I run 10 on all my personal desktops and my desktop at work. We have a 2 Windows 7 machines left in the building. Both are running some accounting software we don't want to upgrade. (How cliched does that sound?) It works fine in 10 but you can't send PDF invoices from it via Email.

    7. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, given that it's been the officially documented way to avoid this. And it's been my experience as well with non-domain joined machines.

    8. Re: That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 0

      I've never run a Windows domain in my life. I have Windows Server whatever the latest version is via the Microsoft Action Pack but we don't use it. I wouldn't know where to begin with it.

    9. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineers fixing PC's? Do you pay them six figures each? They are technicians and so are you. Nothing more.

    10. Re: That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna call bullshit.

      Forget all the special tools that stop the updates coming in. Forget hiding updates.

      You have those specific keys in your registry set to those specific values and you STILL have Windows 10, through absolutely no action you or anyone who has access to your computer has taken?

      Tell me more.

    11. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      So if 3 technicians know the answer, why do all the 6 figure engineers struggle with it? Why aren't they telling more people about it?

    12. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The key registry setting will actually delete any partially downloaded Windows 10 folder if it detects it.

    13. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      My story is purely anecdotal and definitely not scientific. But when I see apparently knowledgeable people saying they can't keep 10 off their machines whatever they do, it makes me wonder if they have an agenda with what they're saying.

      If you (or lots of other non-NDA-bound people) had the source code for windows update , you wouldn't have to wonder. You could have found out yourself, or the other people who hadn't signed NDAs would have made it public knowledge why it happens in some systems and not in others.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    14. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: an engineer builds stuff, a technician fixes stuff.

    15. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification.

  25. Disable critical updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disable windows update service on startup - that thing is malware

  26. Re:trick and mislead ... all about the $s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has realized that the end of OS improvements and upgrades for many people is within sight as is the ability to get people to pay every year or two for the "new Windows OS."

    Consequently Microsoftdoesn't make an Operating System anymore, it is an Advertising System!

  27. Re: I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by spectrum- · · Score: 2

    I feel a bit conflicted on this one. On the one hand, you're absolutely correct - MS is pushing this to monetise the OS and use windows store platformto generate a new revenue stream to compensate for the drop in PC sales etc.

    But on the other hand Windows 10 has some stuff in it I really like. Ignoring briefly the dubious back peddling on the ux disaster that was 8 and 8.1 there's some nice stuff in there like OneGete and powershell 5 and native stuff like virtual desktops and forthcoming ssh and bash shell etc. Some stuff lifted from other platforms who but nice nonetheless.

    The real problem is it's gonna only get worse as they try and suck everything into Azure and Office 365 and a variety of other vendor lock in stuff. All looks somewhat enticing now while they love all the open source at the moment. But this can't last.

  28. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 0

    "If."

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  29. The sheep goes "Baaa". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should cost Microsoft. Forcing their "Free" upgrade down people's throats who don't want it is costing many people a lot of money to clean up the aftermath. Make no mistake, Microsoft is making money off of everyone who upgrades so it's in their best interest. You are either the consumer or the product. With Windows 10 you are the product. Unfortunately it hasn't cost Microsoft enough to not pull these sort of tactics. They may or may not be legal, but the tactics they are taking are certainly sleazy and unethical at the least.

  30. Lucky me by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 4, Informative

    All my 7 installs are Enterprise, which are "not eligible" for this "free upgrade" lol.

    1. Re:Lucky me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a freaking lol-tard, it makes you look like an idiot.

  31. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using Win10 for some time and rather liked it. Although, I did by accident discover that hovering the mouse in the lower left corner of the screen made my Win 2012 server display a start menu icon. But these stealth upgrades are really annoying me. I discovered that there was an upgrade deposit building in a hidden directory on my laptop hard drive (Win7 pro -- domain connected). Problem is that the vendor (Lenovo) does not support this device for Win10 (SL510) -- or I would have done it myself. The directory showed when I booted off my alternative desktop -- Ubuntu. I have a bunch of $$ proprietary software that demands a particular windows version so a forced upgrade is just theft. Even beyond that the involuntary patch cycle that undoes my file associations is really getting on my nerves. I don't really care how my MS likes Edge... it wont share URLs with my Chrome on android or linux, and it won't save anything. If GRC does not keep the Win10 wolf from the door then it looks like Linux will be my full time OS (and android of course) and the firewall rules will get restructured a bit to block their malware. I used to work for a software vendor and understand the headaches of supporting multiple OS versions (especially with no unified environment like VMS), but the trickery being used is just plain wrong. Time for lawsuits I think...

  32. How many friggin' times do I have to say NO! by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    . Updategate: Microsoft reinstalls piss-U-off-qwik Windows 10 virus, again

    .
    Microsoft missed the 'no means no' portion of sex-ed class...

    1. Re:How many friggin' times do I have to say NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Make sure the Close button on the title bar has the same effect as Cancel or Close"
      But then, Microsoft Word does not respect there own ISO standard for Word formats, so this isn't a bug surprise.
      I still have all Windows updates disabled since December last year, installed Never10 on a couple other machines, and try to minimize booting into Windows on dual-boot machines. Next step is moving browsers to VM's running on a proxy server and blocking everything except the connection to the VM for all user machines. Things getting ugly is the price to pay for using Windows.

    2. Re:How many friggin' times do I have to say NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .
      Updategate: Microsoft reinstalls piss-U-off-qwik Windows 10 virus, again

      .

      Microsoft missed the 'no means no' portion of sex-ed class...

      And the bit about using lube.

    3. Re:How many friggin' times do I have to say NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is raping your computer. (You didn't consent, did you? It's rape.)

      Does your child have a computer? Did Microsoft upgrade without your child's consent. Child rape.

      Microsoft is a bunch of child rapers.

      (be cool if that meme got going)

  33. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it is hilarious to me that there are actually people here who will defend MS...

    It wouldn't surprise me if there were paid shills defending Microsoft on the boards. Probably wouldn't be the first time Microsoft did something like that.

  34. Funny thing is, would buy win 10 but not upgrade by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    I would probably buy win10 on my next new computer without giving it a second thought but I'm very resistant to upgrading my win 8.1 system.

    On top of that, Microsoft's behavior is giving me a strong push towards linux for my main permanent box.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  35. LOL, people are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did this on purpose so that Windows 11 (or 12, or whatever) can feature the "now 100% optional choices" that make people so happy and they can't wait to upgrade because it actually asked them if they want to upgrade... (even though this version is even more intrusive spyware)

    Dumbass sheep, that is humans.

  36. Take control, go linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same ol same ol from Microsoft, nice to hear that people are reacting, they need to keep on acting and move to Linux.

  37. Ideas about Microsoft's abuse: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow! Many of the comments above have somewhat justified or accepted Microsoft's abuse.

    1) Can we have a court case to force Microsoft to sell everyone the Enterprise version of Windows 10?

    2) On Windows 7 and 8, turn off automatic updates and use Autopatcher. Unfortunately, Autopatcher has not begun supporting Windows 10. We need independent control over Windows operating system updates. How can we achieve that?

    3) Don't let Windows connect to the internet. Use 2 separate networks. There would need to be some way for the separate networks to communicate. Internet access could be done using separate computers running Linux.

    Microsoft has a long, long history of releasing defective code and fixing it later. After fixing 2,722 vulnerabilities and other defects, Microsoft declared Microsoft Windows XP "end of life". After fixing almost 3,000 defects, Microsoft declared Windows XP was too vulnerable to use.

    We still have 17 computers running Windows XP with a software firewall. We've had no problems. Everyone is a limited rights user.

    4) We need international support for a Windows-compatible operating system, like ReactOS.

    5) Maybe the U.S. government now only helps the rich gets richer. The European government could bring a huge court case against Microsoft.

    1. Re:Ideas about Microsoft's abuse: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on win7 pro, its easy.

      disable winupdate service
      disable BITS service

      kill (cannot disable, but can apply a registry file to make no start) taskscheduler service
      reboot

      ive no idea what autopatcher is, never heard of it.

  38. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't use m$ products, problem solved.

  39. Grandma doesn't know how to use the registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nor should she.

    clearly windows 10 is not ready for the desktop.

    1. Re:Grandma doesn't know how to use the registry by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      So go tell Grandma how to do sort it out.

      Alternatively just talk about grandma on the internet and how bad Windows 10 is.

  40. Regardless of the arguments: Thanks, Slashdot! by mschuyler · · Score: 2

    Argue away, but the fact is Slashdot warned me in time. I thought I had put Win X to bed a long time ago, but up it pops again. I killed it again, thanks to Slashdot. Don't know how long it will stay dead, but at least it is for now.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  41. Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by bigal123 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My parents were just hit with the Windows10 upgrade. I had not bothered to block it on their computer. They are older and now more confused than ever about what happened without their permissions. Many of their saved passwords were cleared out to sites. They struggle to use Windows as it is and Microsoft does not make it easy on a normal day. I truly think that a massive class action suit against Microsoft would easily win hands down.

    The first law firm to step up and push it right could make some money. End users may not get a whole lot out of it, but it might make MS shut up and listen.

    An no I normally don't like these types of law suits and don't like most lawyers, but this clearly shows need.

    My folks were already on the verge of going to a Mac. this may push them over the edge.

    1. Re:Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      Buy a mac now. I'm tech support for the same overall situation. At one point I calculated the gas and time it took me to keep a rickety laptop going and I bought a used iMac for them. Best $275 I ever spent....set up the unit with my old single band Airport and now I only visit for dinner.

    2. Re:Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents were just hit with the Windows10 upgrade. I had not bothered to block it on their computer.

      As a slashdot reader, you should have been aware of this and how to block it, so why didn't you?

      In any case it is easy to revert back to their previous Windows version (so long as it is still within 30 days of the upgrade), easy enough to do remotely, you might even be able to talk them through it over the phone. After that you can install GWX control panel or run Never10, to block the Windows 10 upgrade from reappearing.

    3. Re:Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why not a class-action?

      1) You can't. Read the EULA. No class actions; individual actions by arbitration (arbitrator chosen, or at least paid for, by MS) only, if you think you can prove some kind of specific damage.
      2) MS may have more and more expensive lawyers than the US Government, let alone anybody else who might want to try. Even if 1) didn't apply, no contest.
      3) MS doesn't really care about people leaving. The PC market is crashing anyway, and Windows is a non-presence in tablets, *books, and phones. As long as they can sell their cloud services (big, but almost a rounding error compared to Amazon, Google, etc.) to businesses, they'll be happy, until the company runs out of cash (could take a while).
      4) For most people, Linux is not an alternative. Neither is Apple, really. So one way or another Windows is here to stay, grumbling and griping notwithstanding.

      If you want to stay on W7, apply the documented and undocumented tweaks. Never10 and GWX Control Panel. Set Windows Update to ask before downloading, and uncheck Recommended Updates with Important. Hide and re-hide the W10 things (in Optional Updates) as the appear/reappear. If you can't figure it out and don't have an IT Guy on staff, outsource to a computer shop. Done.

      W10 itself can be controlled, but if done right it ends up looking and working like W7 but with a weird start menu, too much network activity (even after turning off or blocking the major hogs), slightly higher power consumption than W7 in older machines, uncontrollable updates, and rotten drivers. On the latter, a latency problem has reappeared on one older machine of mine in W10 that was fixed in W7 5 years ago - ??? Bottom line: W10 can be controlled, but it may not be worth it if you already have W7 working right, and some useful software no longer works (as is usual with new OS's). Choose wisely.

    4. Re:Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why "may"? Just send them to the Apple store and get it over with.

    5. Re:Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think his parents agreed to any EULA?

      Where's the proof that the owner of the machine has agreed to any of the terms?

  42. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    (For whoever missed the reference and thought I was trolling: here you go.)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  43. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EU is like an old elephant, it is slow to move, but when it moves, it smashes everything!

  44. It's not just a forced update.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...It's also an extension of the Windows Genuine Advantage validation tool (is it still called that?)

    I let an old laptop I had update to windows 10. It detected I had a non-genuine windows 7 installation, rolled back the update and stripped out the licence key.

    This gives them another crack of the whip in weeding out the pirates.

    1. Re:It's not just a forced update.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This gives them another crack of the whip in weeding out the pirates.

      You are correct. Of course, if the OS is a free update, why would M$ be concerned about pirates?
      Good question!
      Maybe because there is a very active plan to monetize the OS.
      And the first step is to maximize participation in Win 10 ASAP.
      So ask yourself, how much are you willing to pay for your yearly Windows subscription?
      Coming in the not so distant future.
      If you can't see this coming, maybe you would be interested in buying some land in Florida....

  45. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a nasty class action lawsuit against Microsoft in this issue.

    And I'd like to join it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  46. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    Silly rabbit, the next Windows critical security update will fix that registry error you just created.

    I doubt that Microsoft is going to break Microsofts How to manage Windows 10 notification and upgrade options documentation.

  47. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by danomac · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few days ago I fixed a business computer. It kept nagging and finally installed Windows 10.

    The result?

    1. The upgrade finally killed the (very old) hard drive in the PC. Errors everywhere, had to be replaced.
    2. The old office suite no longer worked.
    3. The antivirus messed up.
    4. Somehow during the process the email screwed up and they lost some of it (not repairable.)
    5. The custom order entry system he used no longer ran.

    So a new hard drive was installed and Win7 put back on. Everything was reinstalled, and I put in the GPO policies and registry tweaks that stop W10 for now... until Microsoft decides to change it again.

    When I told them they'd have to probably spend $700+ replacing their old software (and still risk the order entry system not working) they were very mad at Microsoft. This was their only functioning workstation and so its lost definitely affected business operations. The computer store was backlogged over a week (!) fixing issues like this one so they called me.

  48. Re:Linux does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me thinks he speaks from truth

    https://linux.slashdot.org/story/16/05/29/212204/systemd-starts-killing-your-background-processes-by-default

    Truth never gets a mod-up around here, unless it fits the I - LUV - LINUX straight jacket.

  49. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had all of windows update turned off on my Windows 7 box for a while now, waiting for this shitstorm to be gone.

  50. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The "x" does what you think it does. It closes the notification. It does not cause upgrades to happen, and it does not stop upgrades from happening, it only closes the window. The problem is that the update is scheduled already by the time that notification appears, and you must cancel the scheduled upgrade while still in that windows instead of closing it.

  51. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    They should force Microsoft to include an OS choice screen, like the browser choice one. A selection of alternate operating systems, including Ubuntu, Tails and ChromeOS. There would need to be some kind of mechanism in there for processing refunds for the unused Windows licence too.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  52. "possibly-unrelated" nuclear subs - targeting MS?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love that last bit at the end. The Chinese are totally launching those subs because of Windows 10 - Microsoft must pay the red price!

    Sadly, that's almost justifiable... almost

  53. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Why do you say disabling recommended updates is an extreme? I always disable them. They aren't the same as the critical security updates, they are just various driver updates, langauge packs, and the like. And the update to Windows 10. I've never had any issues with Windows 10 upgrades or nagging notifications since I've had recommended (Again, not critical) updates turned off the whole time.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  54. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except, I entered into an agreement with Microsoft. They received consideration (a portion of the purchase price of the OS I bought) in exchange for fulfilling their side of the bargain -- there was no reason to believe that after I paid money for the product (as I have for twenty years), instead of actively supporting it as usual they would try to trick me into upgrading to a new version that is not functionally equivalent (in particular, forcing advertising on my PC and changing the UI).

    If Microsoft offers to refund the money I paid for 8.1 Pro and I choose to accept that offer, my damages may be limited somewhat, but I've not received that offer from Microsoft yet, let alone agreed to cancel our contract.

    Hopefully all this nonsense will stop when the "free upgrade" expires in July -- it never occurred to me that I would look forward to a free upgrade offer expiring, but Microsoft has finally lost my future business. I've moved most of my machines have moved to Linux in the past year just to escape from Microsoft and have been pleasantly surprised at how well it works out for me. Win 8.1 is the last Windows version for me.

  55. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure this ordeal will drive me away in the end. Right now I'm working on a Visual Studio project, but as soon as I have time I'm planning to switch over to something like Ubuntu and just run MS-specific stuff like that virtualized and deal with whatever performance hit I take.

  56. Sex has some parts I really like by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I feel a bit conflicted on this one. ... But on the other hand Windows 10 has some stuff in it I really like.

    Suppose for a moment that Windows 10 was awesome, as good as sex. And Microsoft is forcing it upon people who don't want it. How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

    In my case, I have expensive hardware which is controlled by a Windows application, an application which doesn't run in Windows 10. Without Windows 7 or earlier, I have to throw out several thousand dollars worth of equipment.

    1. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my case, I have expensive hardware which is controlled by a Windows application, an application which doesn't run in Windows 10. Without Windows 7 or earlier, I have to throw out several thousand dollars worth of equipment.

      So throw out the equipment, Mr. McGoo! If it's not on your local setup then it's not worth the matter it's composed of. Buy new expensive shit! You will be happy! If not then I will be happy to show you our dungeons where shit gets done. SHIT GETS DONE! Don't worry, if you're not a peon then I won't pee on you.

    2. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I feel a bit conflicted on this one. ... But on the other hand Windows 10 has some stuff in it I really like.

      Suppose for a moment that Windows 10 was awesome, as good as sex. And Microsoft is forcing it upon people who don't want it. How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

      In my case, I have expensive hardware which is controlled by a Windows application, an application which doesn't run in Windows 10. Without Windows 7 or earlier, I have to throw out several thousand dollars worth of equipment.

      IF it is going to happen anyway, just try to enjoy it.
      TRUMP2016! NOT JUST THE BEST PRESIDENT, THE LAST!

    3. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

      The only thing I'm conflicted about is the fact that you're comparing a free OS update with rape.

      Don't do that.

    4. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Kickasso · · Score: 1

      > I have expensive hardware which is controlled by a Windows application

      You have made your bed, now lie in it.

    5. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

      The only thing I'm conflicted about is the fact that you're comparing a free OS update with rape.

      Don't do that.

      Then how would you describe what Microsoft is doing?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

      The only thing I'm conflicted about is the fact that you're comparing a free OS update with rape.

      Don't do that.

      Then how would you describe what Microsoft is doing?

      Not in a way that belittle's and demeans a very serious case of sexual assault to something akin to an inconvenience or a breach of corporate social. If you think they are comparable that says a lot...

    7. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Multiply that "inconvenience" (I gross understatement) by several hundred million and it's not a small thing at all.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      I dunno. The comparison is pretty apt on many levels when you actually think about it.

      1) Rape is a forceful act, in which one person is rendered powerless, then has genetic material forcefully inserted. It is considered a heinous violation, because the perpetrator does this exclusively for their own power tripping and physical pleasure, damaging another human being mentally, emotionally, and physically, then leaving them with all the consequences. It denies the victim agency, and dehumanizes them into a simple object that exists for the perps's pleasure, who's later sufferings are unimportant.

      2) This kind of forced update holds many parallels. It is also a forceful act (done without proper consent), in which the user is rendered powerless, and computer data is forcefully inserted. it should be considered and analogously heinous violation because MS is doing this exclusively for its own power tripping and financial benefit, damaging other people's businesses and system configurations, causing mental harm to users and admins who have previously told them NO repeatedly through blocking the update, setting registry keys, and uninstalling prior updates that made it through (all things MS can trivially check for but doesnt) leaving them with all the consequences of the action. This kind of policy denies the user of agency on what does and does not get installed on their system, and dehumanizes them as just statistical figures for unexploited market potential, that exist only to make MS more money, who's sufferings are unimportant to them.

      The major difference is that rape affects humans directly, where this kind of digital rape affects humans indirectly.

      Further, the kinds of justifications levied in defense of these heinous acts are very similar:

      "If she didnt want it, she shouldnt dress provacatively!"
      "If you dont want the update, you shouldn't accept security updates promiscuously!"

      When you really think about it, the two are very closely related pathologies, and handwaving it away like you did is a disservice to the people who's systems are being violated like that.

  57. Wrong title by stooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The title is wrong. It should read :
    "Not enough Backlash Building Over Windows 10 Upgrades "

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:Wrong title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's "Not enough Backlash Building Over Corrupt Politicians" either. And you're gonna get an 'upgrade' that nobody wants! Ya see the relationship? Buyer beware is better than Buyer's Remorse...

    2. Re:Wrong title by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


      My brother, backlash can only take you so far.

      This has become a monster, changing and adapting and worse, winning.

      We must nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  58. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to doubt harder, then.

  59. PC World by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Boy, PC World, and its dozens of tracking includes on the page, are really milking this Windows10 story.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  60. Microsoft Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you run windows on the Microsoft computer, Microsoft knows what is best for the Computer now owned by Microsoft, and can update that computer at a time that is convenient to Microsoft.

    unlike open-sores software, Microsoft software takes full ownership of the computer it is run on.

    Be grateful that Microsoft allows you some limited control over its property.

  61. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've installed GWX Control panel and still see it "detect" that something has changed every so often. Then at one point (and silly me, I didn't alt-printscreen) the GWX software was detected by MS Security Essentials and suggested I remove it.

    Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

    Funny this 4th and long hail Mary pass from MS was followed quickly by the abandon-ship call for the Windows Phone.... Yet I digress.

  62. China dont cry to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are 3 or 4 billion of you and not one of you can make a decent OS?
    We hate these mother fuckers to.

  63. Upgrade to linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upgrade to linux!

    You'll never be harassed to upgrade you OS again...

  64. 1.2 million Chinese complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt that. Probably the work of the Chinese 50 cent army.

  65. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The broken HDD is very common. Many drives, as they age, effectively become 'read only'- where the heads reliably retrieve files, but new write operations damage the surface of the aged platters.

    MS just doesn't give a damn. The upgrade triggers a vast number of write operations, and as sector failures occur, Microsoft's dreadful HDD 'fix' program kick in trashing the enture drive. No yes, dribblers and creps will tediously claim this is the 'fault' of the owner for not replacing the drive when it got to this state- point the saliennt point is that the HDD faults were currently NON-CRITICAL, and the user OS settings reasonable for continued use.

    Installing a new OS on an OLD machine should only be done to a new drive, SSD or memory stick. The old drive must be left alone (and yes, someone really should copy the criticla files to a new storage location- but we all know that).

  66. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did all the registry edits, you know, the disable osupgrade, the disableGWX, and so on. I finally simply let the GWX folder install, emptied it, and took system privileges away from it. Did the same for the SoftwareDistribution folder. Now the system does not upgrade. This was forced because MS refused to pay attention to the do not upgrade message.

  67. Never had updates turned on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have always disabled updated on Windows boxes.

    Obviously it's a security risk, but I've felt the risk of an update screwing up your machine to be greater.

    Then came the first driver updates which *removed major functionality*, and I was glad I'd turned updates off.

    As you can imagine, watching all this stuff roll by where MS are abusing updates to push their OS, well, I'm glad I finally bought the new laptop six months ago and am now on Linux.

  68. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that they've already done so at least twice in the last few months.

  69. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be a superlative reaction!

  70. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly. Care to share the actual damages you suffered at the hands of this free update reminder? Please don't tell us you were tricked into installing it since you don't use Windows and according to you, you are the smartest motherfucker ever to walk the face of the earth.

  71. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

    Oh, how nice. Grandpa over here is bringing back the M$ way of typing Microsoft.

    It's idiotic and adds nothing to the discussion. I bet you spell America as Amerika too... Yawn.

    Grow up, AC. "M$" is just a frigging abbreviation. Yes, it is usually used negatively, but it's still just an abbreviation.

    Using your "logic" we should stop calling desktop computers "PCs". After all, that "ancient" term was first used several decades ago.

    Idiots. Everywhere I turn, nothing but idiots.

  72. What will be interesting when the offer expires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will be interesting when the offer expires will be if I am entitled to the upgrade, as I have already accepted the upgrade and upgraded my home laptop. But Windows 10 didn't have the correct graphics drivers to support the laptops switchable graphics so I had to go back to 7.

    So I presume once the drivers issue is resolved I am still entitled to my free upgrade.

  73. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Care to share the actual damages you suffered at the hands of this free update reminder?

    My time. I could have used it to better myself, or masturbate or whatever.

    Please don't tell us you were tricked into installing it since you don't use Windows

    Who told you that? I talk about using Windows all the time. I paid for Win7Pro, on purpose.

    and according to you, you are the smartest motherfucker ever to walk the face of the earth.

    Alas, I still talk to ACs, so that can't possibly be the case.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  74. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Nunya666 · · Score: 2

    The result?

    2. The old office suite no longer worked.

    A friend of mine had W10 forced on him recently. He didn't notice an option to cancel the "upgrade", although it could have been there. After W10 was installed, his Office 2010 demanded the product key. He couldn't find his original installation media, so he couldn't use Office. He had something that he needed to do in Word, so he looked for alternatives. Another friend suggested OpenOffice, and he installed it just fine. He called me for help using OO, since he knows I use it in Linux. I helped him resolve his technical issue, and we have another happy non-Microsoft user.

    Since he paid for Office, he should be able to use it for as long as he wants to. The fact that W10 breaks an existing installation is silly and underhanded.

    Go Microsoft! Keep shooting yourself in the foot. Class action lawsuits rarely accomplish anything more than making a few lawyers richer than they already are. With that in mind, the best chance that Linux fans have is for Microsoft to alienate their customers so badly that they look for non-Microsoft alternatives. So far, Microsoft is doing a wonderful job of alienating their users.

  75. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by old_kennyp · · Score: 1

    I have disabled update process entirely for any home machines I am responsible for..None of my computers can run it effectively as they are older hardware, and the BS about "bettter performance" and "working fine on older machines" is just lies!.

  76. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've installed GWX Control panel and still see it "detect" that something has changed every so often. Then at one point (and silly me, I didn't alt-printscreen) the GWX software was detected by MS Security Essentials and suggested I remove it.

    Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

    Funny this 4th and long hail Mary pass from MS was followed quickly by the abandon-ship call for the Windows Phone.... Yet I digress.

    I have GWX Control Panel, and MS Security Essentials, yet the program was not detected as a virus. However, I am not running it in "monitor mode". Did you download it from the originating site?

  77. Happy to have an unactivated win7 pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never bothered to type in the key printed at the bottom of my laptop.
    The benefits: I get a nice black background, on boot it asks me to activate my win7, what solves itselv either after 30 sec or after pressing cancel.
    aaand the biggest benefit: I NEVER get asked to update to win10!

    Why would you ever want to use a activated version, if it leads to shit like win10?

  78. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah between the shady updates and the bundled storefront it sorta boggles my mind that the EU hasn't lifted a finger. I mean they went crazy when MS as much as bundled a browser with the OS and now ........ nothing..........

  79. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by danomac · · Score: 1

    They need the old version of Office to work with their order entry system. Switching it to something else was not an option, and there's no guarantee it will work with the newer versions of Office.

  80. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux doesn't pull this crap on you. Neither does PC-BSD.

  81. Windows 10 automatic upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am furious!

    How dare they make the programme upgrade your computer without permission??? If I press no, thanks 100 times, what makes the 101 st time ok to change my operating system automatically?

    No better than a virus! Class action suit indeed!!!

  82. Re: I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is already existing, superior options for everything that you listed.

    Windows 10 is spyware and adware. That is never going on any of my systems.

  83. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by macs4all · · Score: 1

    The "x" does what you think it does. It closes the notification. It does not cause upgrades to happen, and it does not stop upgrades from happening, it only closes the window. The problem is that the update is scheduled already by the time that notification appears, and you must cancel the scheduled upgrade while still in that windows instead of closing it.

    And you don't call that deceptive?

  84. Solve this the right way by Weirsbaski · · Score: 2

    They need to bring this to court, so a judge can solve this the right way-

    "Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, this court is considering fining MSoft $100Billion. But I'll totally give you an out- my laptop is running an app that sets the actual fine. If you can figure out how to get the app to NOT fine you, then we'll go with that. Otherwise you're assumed to have agreed with this dollar amount, and waived your rights to appeal. You have five minutes, and... GO!"

    --

    I am not a sig.
  85. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by fafalone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That alone isn't enough. They needed to be fined enough that they get the message. There's no way their legal department didn't inform the higher ups that this kind of abuse would leave them open to liability, but the past has proved to them any resulting fines are a minor fraction of the money they made doing it. The only way to actually discourage this kind of behavior is to make the fine so severe that their shareholders take notice. I'm thinking a whole quarters profit should get that message across, which Google tells me was $5bn in Q1 2015.

  86. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by kheldan · · Score: 1

    I'll sign that petition! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit!

    What do we want?
    Lawsuit!
    When do we want it?
    Now!
    What do we want?
    Lawsuit!
    When do we want it?
    Now!

    Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  87. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by LesFerg · · Score: 1

    $700 should not have been a large portion of the annual income for a business, I would think, if they relied so much on a single workstation.
    It sounds like it was old enough to require either replacing or a HDD upgrade already.
    No excusing the unexpected upgrade, but the business seems to be partly at fault for the extent of the damage and down-time.

    --
    If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  88. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by LesFerg · · Score: 1

    Since he paid for Office, he should be able to use it for as long as he wants to. The fact that W10 breaks an existing installation is silly and underhanded.

    He didn't pay for Office. He paid for a license to use Office. I don't think that windows 10 broke that, it simply required proof of said license purchase, which is the one part of your Office pack that you should never throw away, lose, or borrow from somebody else.

    --
    If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  89. I don't know what all the fuss is about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is creating more work for me.
    Life is good :)

  90. Windows 3.11 still works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I continue to use Windows 3.11. You can't stop me Microsoft. I can dial into BBS's just fine to read my email.

  91. How to stop windows 10 update. by clockley(571021718) · · Score: 1

    Create an admin user then create another unprivileged account. Use this account to do your work. Windows will still download window s 10 but the installer will ask for the admin account before installing.

    1. Re:How to stop windows 10 update. by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "Create an admin user then create another unprivileged account. Use this account to do your work."

      Excellent advice, but please note that everyone should do this all the time anyway.

      Yes, badly written software will create hassles along the way. Usually they can be fixed by granting write permissions to the specific "Program Files" folder(s) that the misbehaving software is expecting.

    2. Re:How to stop windows 10 update. by Megane · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tested this? I doubt that the current user being on an unprivileged account would be enough to keep the installer from running as a system process with system permissions, just like how the rest of system updates work.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:How to stop windows 10 update. by clockley(571021718) · · Score: 1

      works on my mom laptop that runs win 7 pro.

  92. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that they've already done so at least twice in the last few months.

    It's what I have followed to keep my Win 7 machines on Win 7 and there has yet to be any attempt to update them to Windows 10.

  93. windows upgraded to windows 10 without my acceptin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I do a lot of work in older versions of operating systems as some of my clients run industrial machines that don't run in newer versions of windows. I went away for vacation for a week and left my desktop on so I could do some work if I had a client call. Came home and my machine was black screened. rebooted it and it says welcome to windows 10.

    An operating system that updates without prompting the user or letting them decide is just wrong on so many levels. I had ignored the nag screens that kept coming up and saying upgrade now because I spent over 100 hours getting windows 7 to work with my old development software. How pissed off am I, well where to start... Needless to say there was a lot of four letter words shouted from my office this evening. I declined the licensing agreement and the machine said it would revert back to my previous version... I don't hold out much hope, 2 hours so far and the machine has not rebooted, just says reverting back to previous version.

    Thanks Microsoft, once again finding a way to f&*k over your customers, and thanks for the new IE version too.

  94. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by Agripa · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is assaulting its user base with features and upgrades that they don't want.

    While removing features and compatibility that they do want.

  95. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

    Yes, you stupid fool, if it was the fucking tire maker who deliberately punctured your tire!

  96. Bit here too by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    I know Apple ain't perfect, but when Win 10 showed up uninvited on a family machine, it clashed with an Netgear AC wireless dongle. Took about two hours to realize that was the problem... Since all I do is Word or Excel, I'm happy to pay the Apple tax...they never stole my time like this.....and time spent fixing a computer that was NOT broken is truly wasted time.

  97. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1
    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  98. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    It is highly deceptive. But claiming that the "x" installs windows is also deceptive, or uninformed.

  99. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by sjames · · Score: 1

    They've already resorted to unhiding updates that the user hid. What makes you think they won't undo other actions the user takes to explicitly reject an update?

  100. Stop adding stupid shit to the end of summaries by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    In a possibly-unrelated development, the Chinese military plans to send nuclear submarines into the Pacific Ocean.

    That's not cute. That's obnoxious. Cut that shit out.

  101. MS stole my webcam, speakers, printer and scanner by amigabill · · Score: 1

    There may be more, but the things I know don't work after installing Win10 include my laptop's webcam and speakers, and my combo printer/scanner/fax machine.

    I'm taking an online class this summer, involving video conferencing, printing stuff and scannign my work to submit online. My kid can't skype with his remote grandparents.

    Sorry MS, this is quite a fail.

    There are allegedly Win10 drivers for stuff internal in my laptop, but I haven't yet solved that riddle satisfactorily.

    The maker of my printer/scanner unit says NO, we wil lnot make any Win10 drivers for that. Screw you, buy a new one. IMHO, if MS is so insistent that Win7 and Win8 users change to Win10, then they should also make demands on vendors to mandatorily make Win10 drivers for any gizmos they made for Win7 or Win8. My printer/scanner has vendor supported drivers for both Win7 and 8, but MS wants to take this support away from me by not wanting me to continue using my Win7 Ultimate edition.

    So, since stuff no longer works, and some of that stuff probably never will work again, should I be able to sue MS, since I'd have been find if we had not been hustled into this Win10 thing?

    Before I allowed Win10 to do its thing, I did a clonezilla on my hard drive, so I can go back with a hard drive swap. Or so I assume and hope. Would MS have mangled the licensing to forbid that from working?

    My wife didn't get any confirmation or anything when hers updated, and she was in the middle of some important work that she lost and had to do over a while later. She says she said no when it asked, and I assume she got scammed by the red X means yes trick. I don't know if that's what happened or not, but makes the most sense from what she told me. She was in Virtualbox installing RedHat when hers began Win10 install and that of course did not get saved properly when the rug underneath it was pulled.

  102. Out-Gatesing Gates? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Could it be Mr. Nadella is actually a bigger dick than Gates?

    Is that possible?

  103. Change of strategy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Instead of the stick, Microsoft will now try the carrot.

    1. Re:Change of strategy by Megane · · Score: 1

      I don't think that picture accurately reflects the concept of "the carrot".

      A more appropriate analogy would be a rectally inserted carrot.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  104. Re:MS stole my webcam, speakers, printer and scann by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Your printer/scanner probably even speaks the same (proprietary) protocol as modern, supported devices, and all it would take to make it work would be a hex editor... if not for driver signing.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  105. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh, Microsoft has already bribed and/or lobbied the politics to accept its actions. What the lawsuit would result is at most that customers would get a $5 discount coupon on Microsoft store.

  106. Block That Sh!t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either GWX Control Panel or Never 10. Be sure to check for any newer versions.

    I did ONE Windows 10 upgrade from 7. Almost 2 months later the Start menu was unresponsive. Common problem, left click on the Start menu and nothing happens. The only fix that worked was to create a new profile & transfer everything over.

  107. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by thegarbz · · Score: 0

    1. The upgrade finally killed the (very old) hard drive in the PC. Errors everywhere, had to be replaced.

    So the update found a latent hardware issue that was about to screw the entire system anyway leaving you in exactly the same position regardless if it happened or not?

    Of all the Windows 10 stories I've seen, with this one I sympathise the least.

  108. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I used to hate the term shill as it was used to describe "everyone I disagree with". I hated it even more when I got called a shill, mainly because I figured if I should put up with that name calling the least someone could do was pay me for it.

    But now... Despite all the good technical features windows 10 offers, and despite it being a somewhat solid system underneath MS's fucked up business decisions, people seem to defend the absolute indefensible.

    I'm now reasonably certain there are MS shills on here.

  109. What happens when the free upgrade period ends? by naranek · · Score: 2

    The free upgrade period for Windows 10 ends in July. What happens after that? Microsoft is pushing it so hard that it's really hard to see them putting a price tag to it.

    --
    Only dumb birds land downwind.
    1. Re:What happens when the free upgrade period ends? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      They will pay you to install Windows X. Double if you're now a Linux user.

    2. Re:What happens when the free upgrade period ends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever someone pushes so hard to give you something for free, it should raise lots of alarms and red flags. Like a drug dealer giving out samples.
      What Microsoft is doing reminds me of that last Terminator movie, when everyone gets the same "game" on an ipad-like device, but then the "game" turns out to be a highly distributed neural net. Software has no incremental cost. They let the public pay for all the hardware, then the "big corporation" gets to use it for their own purposes for free...

      What's Microsoft doing? Why are they pushing so hard for us to install their software, even when we don't want it?

      What kind of power can you wield with a few billion PCs running background code that you control?

  110. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Social media management has been an accepted cost of business for a long time now. You can bet your ass they've got armies of people spreading the good word.

  111. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well it wouldn't be the first time, they've done that once already

  112. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever. The end result stays the same: he is now using something else.

  113. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right. I call this story a complete bull !

  114. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    I bet MS still installed all the 'telemetry' crap on your PC(s).

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  115. Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft and Windows. And MA Office. And all the parasites that benefited from the chicanery that fucking group of assholes engaged in since the cuntpany was first conceived in the twisted, diseased mind of uberasshole William F. Gates the Turd.

    Sorry, whuh? What about Windows 10?

    Sorry, I admit I stopped paying attention after the word Microsoft, because...

    Fuck Microsoft.

  116. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft doesn't even look at the micro blogging site, what good does complaining on it do?

    The users do not expect Microsoft do do anything. There is no way that Microsoft aren't aware that people think their way of pushing out Windows 10 is more or less illegal. (I evaluated Windows 7 and 8 and decided to buy 7. I wouldn't accept getting 8 pushed on me, why would I accept 10 getting pushed on me?)
    Trying to reason with Microsoft is useless. What the users are trying to do is create enough public opinion that the Government sides with them on this matter.
    At some point Microsoft has to be told to stop acting like dicks or GTFO.

  117. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't make sense..especially after they've "agreed" to switch the behaviour back to normal:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2459429/updategate-microsoft-climbs-down-from-deceitful-windows-10-ruse

    The original behavior of X in that dialog even conflicted with their own user experience guidelines:
    "The Close button on the title bar should have the same effect as the Cancel or Close button within the dialog box. Never give it the same effect as OK."
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn742499%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

  118. WINDOWS 10 - Should you upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just voluntarily upgraded to Windows 10 from 7 and love it. I didn't want to at first because I didn't like the way they worked in the stores. But I tried it 1st on my laptop which I hardly ever used and totally loved it. It's very fast, easy to use , very cool and keeps everything you had but adds so much more. The next day I upgraded my desktop. You would not believe how retrograde 7 is until you upgrade to 10. It's like the difference between 1080 & 4K. People - read the online reviews. All the pros are telling you to do it. I'm saying it's a must. It's really great.

    1. Re:WINDOWS 10 - Should you upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I forgot to mention that I also installed LibreOffice, and it works flawlessly with Windows 10.

      Just like Windows 10, LibreOffice is free. The only difference is that it won't automatically download to your computer.

      I can't believe how much money I wasted on Microsoft Office when I could have just downloaded LibreOffice, the Free Office Suite.

      You can even put LibreOffice on a USB stick with the free Portable Version of LibreOffice. You can't do that with Microsoft.

  119. From a very great height by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than punitive action, I propose we round up the board of directors and allow anyone who has a grievance to shit on them (literally) from a very great height. I suspect those nasty little updates would be removed very quickly.

  120. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Embrace Windows.
    2. Extend to prevent updates.
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT!

  121. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt that Microsoft is going to break Microsofts How to manage Windows 10 notification and upgrade options documentation.

    Of course they would update the documentation to reflect the changes.

  122. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet you still didn't answer the question. Were you tricked or are you playing make believe?

  123. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by amiga3D · · Score: 0

    You've got more faith in them than I do then. You know you are a powerful monopoly when you can routinely shit all over your customers, or as microsoft calls them, consumers, and they can't do anything about it except take it. Meanwhile shills and fanboys tell everyone how it's not shit but a wonderful new feature. All the while making money in the process.

  124. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately when TTIP takes hold, every peasant will get screwed by his masters.

  125. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by houghi · · Score: 1

    Unwanted update asside, what would have happend if the HD would have gone out without the upgrade? Hardware breaks. Shit happens.
    The real issue here is that they did not have a backup in place. Even worse, they had a single point of failure and that broke.

    Here is what should have happened:
    1) Do the (or any) upgrade and it breaks
    2) Restore the situation as to when it was not broken with backups.
    3) Start looking at a solution for the failed upgrade.
    This could be Windows, Linux kernel or Notepad upgrades for all I care. There should have been no reason for non working software (points 2-5) after a restore.

    The real issue is that the company was not ready and it was just a disaster waiting to happen where the WIndows update was merely the last drip in the bucket.

    To me an OS version update is nice when it works, but I NEVER expect it to do. And that is while running Linux and having done many upgrades without any issue. I will never expect it to work. I can hope, but never expect as people will never know what I have done to my machine after I first booted it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  126. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then can you explain why people are reporting this registry key being reverted back occasionally? Are they all lying?

  127. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a business man myself, what fool does not have appropriate backukps and relies solely on one machine. If something is mission critical then it should have a backup both hardware AND software, probably both off and onsite. He is gambling with what he has there, that old pc could have died at any time.

  128. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fixed a computer with similar problems: Win7Ultimate box. Sick of the forced upgrade nag screens and hidden updates. Also learned this is why my internet phone wasn't working for a day -- it was downloading Win10 in the background.

    My solution:

    Backed up my documents.
    Wiped the drive.
    Installed Ubuntu Linux.
    Copied my documents back to the hard drive.
    Spent a couple days getting familiar with Linux.
    Got back to work.

    Sadly, I'm not kidding.

  129. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Megane · · Score: 1
    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  130. OP by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    To the submitter: Please do not put links to a paywall site because it is absolutely fucking useless for the vast majority of people here.

    "You've reached a subscriber-only article."

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  131. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    This was their only functioning workstation

    This is why Microsoft doesn't give a shit if your customer is angry or not.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  132. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decept by dugancent · · Score: 1

    No, MS is an abbreviation. M$ is childless.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  133. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    slash is popular enough that it has attracted quite a lot of 'bad elements'.

    there are paid shills here, absolutely sure of that. its obvious to anyone who has spent time here and seen the discourse.

    it was once very left-leaning and progressive and now the conservatives have invaded and will mod down, in army-like fashion, anything they disagree with.

    slash has been invaded. but most of us knew that years ago.

    soylent is quite a lot better; but they are not the target that slash is, in terms of trying to counter-spin common sense.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  134. Microsoft Are Getting Desperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The majority of people hate Windows 10 - its a bag of shite compared to linux Mint.

    I think there numbers are not as good as they pretend to be... and desperate times calls for desperate measures.

    Microsoft have been overtaken by the marketing and sales bimbos - their lack of engineering skill and compelling products is too obvious.

    Linux Mint is in a far superior class now and with Vulkan 3D api, the future is bright.

  135. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by jbengt · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the update is scheduled already by the time that notification appears, and you must cancel the scheduled upgrade while still in that windows instead of closing it.

    I believe that the only choices in that dialog are to click "OK" or to close the window with the little red "x". (at least that was true previously, the upgrade pop ups have been disabled on my work machine)

  136. dichotomy by a1englishman · · Score: 1

    So wait, we cry foul when our Android phones don't get upgraded to the next version of Android, but damn Microsoft for upgrading everyone to Windows 10?

    Yeah, I understand your Windows 7 works great on your ten-year-old PC, but it's going to run out of updates soon, and if your PC's that old maybe you should consider something a little more modern, or get a version of Linux that will keep it going. For the majority of "just make my PC work" folk, automatic upgrades are great. Keep the machine up to date and not force the users to think.

  137. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decept by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

    I think the word you're looking for is "barren"

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  138. Keep your Windows 7 ISOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be sure to hang on to your Windows 7 ISOs and download Never10 in case you 'get upgraded' to Windows 10.

  139. happebed to me this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lost 4 hours of productivity [ trolling reddit ]...

  140. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

    Yes, but try explaining that to a Sr. Manager or bean-counter. It may be 2016, but clients still don't like support people walking in and telling them "you're PC's busted... pay money." "Not busted, working fine." "Microsoft has done something stupid. Must spend money, fix PC before breaks." "Nonesense! My equipment is functioning just fine.. leave me alone." "No. PC broken. Watch." **reboots PC, Windows 10 begins to install all by itself, freezes on blue-screen after third restart** "See, PC broken. That'll be $700."

    Microsoft may seem like a bunch of idiots to IT savvy people, but to business types it appears much more like an extortion racket.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  141. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by asvravi · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Slashdot - where even facts are modded flamebait by frothing zombies just because the facts happen to favor of Microsoft!

  142. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Bizarre. I said nothing there in favor of Microsoft. I was just clarifying misinformation coming from journalists reporting that the "x" button was what caused the upgrades. Which might lead someone to interpret it as "I'll reboot my computer instead, that will fix it!", or "I'll be smart and kill it with task manager instead!"

    That is why this is deceptive. Microsoft knows the customers are not expecting to have to actively opt-out and that most are likely to just close the box instead of reading it closely. They probably have some tech savvy friends saying "Windows will never upgrade itself unless you agree" (and I know some of them).

  143. Revert didn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reverting back to 8.1 didn't work for me.

    My laptop threw up the helpful "An error occurred" en that's that. My desktop computer did revert to 8.1 but borked a couple of drivers making the system crash when rebooting.

    I'm not entirely convinced Microsoft didn't do that on purpose.
     

  144. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Look at the screenshot. There is a third choice. Windows 7 users may hot recognize it because it's in the new "Metro" UI style.
    See: http://images.techhive.com/ima...
    That word "here" in blue is a clickable link. Click on it and you can get somewhere to cancel the upgrade (not sure what it looks like there though).

    Of course the Microsoft lawyers will interpret passive action as passive consent to the upgrade.

  145. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Oh ya, one more note, the new notification is not the same as the older ones that said "upgrade now" versus "start download and upgrade later" versus "X".

  146. Remember you can revert by baerd · · Score: 1

    This is slightly tangential, but if you've 'upgraded' to Win 10 you can revert back to Win 7. I did this myself as I had issues with Win 10 breaking my router (as in it stopped working for all devices not just the PC) and I didn't know you could revert, but found some instructions online. If you've been hoodwinked into Win 10 and are not happy I suggest googling the steps to revert back to what you had before.

    --
    I wish I had a lawn.
  147. Re: I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Zebai · · Score: 1

    I agree Windows 10 has a lot of features and improvements that are nice to have. It is the reason I upgraded myself to Windows 10, however I don't do an "upgrade" like most people have I always do OS Installs on a fresh format usually on a new hardrive with the old one still there as a backup.

    After using windows 10 for months now however I must confess it also has features that I extremely dislike so I have both gained and lost. Windows update on windows 10 is no longer optional it is a mandatory process with a mandatory reboot. This along with a few other "features" has caused me some headache. I've managed to mitigate most of them. Its much more manageable now though since I figured out how to break part of the automatic reboot process since part of it is controlled by the task scheduler but it required changing ownership of several files and making them read only.

  148. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but average joes and janes who have no desire to become security experts and update ninjas just to keep their machine from changing its operating system on them. good job MS, alienating one of your most faithful demographics.

    You don't have to be a security expert to run Linux. I have Grandmothers, Granddads, Truck Drivers, Ironworkers and other average Joes and Janes running Linux just fine.

    You don't need to be a ninja to update either. All it takes when the update alert comes up is click and enter you password to update the WHOLE system and application. If you can't handle that well you should even have a computer of any kind.

    Lets stop the lies about Linux.

  149. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to make lawyers rich and microsoft even richer?

    No, let's have criminal charges laid against the Microsoft board for unauthorised access/tampering with private computer systems and maliciously putting user data at risk.

    They won't get off THAT with money off vouchers.

  150. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah they'll just cover that with money off vouchers and opt-in rebates. Just like they did before. No, let's make the penalties STICK, like say JAIL TIME FOR BOARD MEMBERS for allowing or enabling malicious software putting user data at risk and hobbling productive economy. The only way that is gonna happen is with criminal charges.

  151. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easier to install Linux...

  152. Not much new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS have always made decisions that benefit themselves and make the user miserable. Tying an insecure browser, email program, plugin system, and scripting system to its OS as well as office application suite. Resetting user preferences to default to Microsoft sites and applications. This particular misstep has been consistent in experience across users and professionals, and a consensus has been reached for the first time and absolutely nobody likes this. People are realizing they can't keep going back to the local geek or service center with their problems and they can choose other devices. They're very familiar with the competition and may have other non-MS devices already. Who knows though, the internet loves making a fuss, but then often rolls over.

  153. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha. Childish.

  154. Didn't ask to be upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't ask to be up graded, my laptop just did with no input from me. I just want Windows 7 pro back - what a bunch of cunts

  155. Windows Update in Windows 10 is just as rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not just the update to Windows 10 that acts in this manner.

    Windows Update in Windows 10 will often start to perform an update without regard that I may be working on something, causing me to lose data. This has happened to other people I know. A friend of mine was showing a video presentation when Windows Update started up and took over the PC. And there is no way to make Windows Update behave more civil other than to shut off the service.

    If Microsoft wants people to keep their PC software up-to-date this is not the right approach.

  156. Destructive update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uni students.. One had the update fail and rollback, removing Office. Other had an assignment due and could not do the work cos of her slow laptop doing an update cos she left the room for a piss and missed the opportunity to click NO on the pop up. I mean fuck what?!?!? What is wrong with the people who thought this is a good idea??????

  157. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you try seeing if their software ran under WINE?

  158. We need a class action lawsuit against Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft needs to be taught a fucking lesson. Think of all the hundreds of millions of man hours of recovery work it has caused because of it's actions. It blue screened my laptop and now I've disabled updates. Microsoft can go fuck itself.

  159. A lady marched into office of Microsoft by Olotila · · Score: 1

    A Finnish lady marched into office of Microsoft with unwillingly updated computer and after threatening with a lawsuit got it back with Windows 7 the next day. Finnish Female marched into a Microsoft office Translated version

  160. Thay's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows finally became more difficult and a pain in the ass than Linux

  161. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by martinfb · · Score: 1

    ALL governments that are FOR the people should enact, and act, on legislation to allow buyers: 1) FULL disclosure of a product and it's usage ramifications, and; 2) have abilities to OPT IN what ever 'features' / settings are deemed desired, and; 3) charge ANY company fees to allow any product to do ANY advertising whatsoever.

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  162. Check before you leap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't recommend upgrading any old PCs that are already past their end-of-life support. However, if you do want to continue like me, it will take some witch hunting to get the proper windows drivers with almost zero support from the manufacturer. Know what you want, and make sure your legacy apps or games that you own run on the new Windows 10. However, if you have a decent and more recent desktop, the by all means go upgrade and have fun.

  163. Good. It was expected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9179991&cid=52224549

    https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9168173&cid=52204731

  164. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are going to set up a class action lawsuit - COUNT ME IN!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is an all time LOW for microsoft!!