What a crock of shit. Let me know how third party voting and making the government responsible to you goes. By the way, there's 50 morons waving flags and thanking jesus for ever-expanding federal powers and supporting a constitutional amendment outlawing flag-burning, at this very moment while you're on here spewing bullshit about personal responsibility; I'm sorry, but I'm not responsible for them or the idiots they elect.
I don't know if you realize this, but we have a 2 party system. Every four years, we're faced with a decision between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. The government is not accountable to us, so long as they're getting the terrorists.
No, god is more like a government. Satan is the unsung hero of the bible, the one guy who had the cojones to stand up to god's egotistical tyrannical bullshit.
We fucking know; you're preaching to the choir. The problem is that for every one of us there are 10 hillbillies with 15 kids each, waving their flags and saying "this is 'murica, you don't like it, you can get out."
So, uh, if you won't actually read the evidence, how can any possible amount of evidence convince you?
That's pretty indicative of the mindset of vehement 'deniers.' Like any other debate, anyone with a moderate, thought-out opinion gets shouted down for being an idiot for having the audacity to think rationally instead of getting caught up in the hype, fear-mongering, and knee-jerking.
You can object all you want, the fact is that they aren't running around killing homosexuals and nonbelievers (your spanish inquisition link is out) or burning people they think are practicing dark magic (so much for salem witch trials.) You have a piont with the crusades, maybe, because Dubya has said God told him to invade Iraq, however, the fact that Dubya did it in modern times makes it a bit more pointy. Thirty years' war you may also have a point (see Iraq,) and if you're going to go with slavery you might as well indict all caucasians.
Whether you want to believe it or not, Christians today are less violent than those that came before them by a few orders of magnitude. That doesn't mean they're not still batshit crazy, stupid, and bass-ackward, but if you're going to judge people by things other people did hundreds of years before their birth because they share a label, you're fucking retarded.
It's akin to blasting modern-day Americans for killing Injuns, having slaves, or Jim Crowe laws (at least for those of us who weren't born yet). Does it have an impact? Yes. Does pointing to things that happened before anyone living was ever born make your case stronger? Maybe, but not as much as pointing out the idiotic things Americans do today.
Yeah, the atheists came out in full force in Cali to vote for prop 8 in response to the gays voting for a constitutional amendment against atheist churches.
Unless you think that porn sites make up less than 1% of the internet, the percentage won't dispell the idea behind this article. Further, deliberateness is irrelevant.
Assuming that porn sites make up > 1% of all websites (a pretty safe assumption,) then the ratio of (infected regular sites/uninfected regular) sites is still higher than that of porn sites.
Slashdot Mirror
That's cool. Our new boss is the same as the old boss, though he did gain us a little bit on the healthcare front.
The current government has promised to repeal stupid laws, and this is one that's getting a lot of votes on their site for suggesting laws to repeal.
It's a lot harder to get elected on a platform of making more stupid laws.
Jesse Ventura is a political sage.
Yeah, but when you combine genes from two known safe foods, they can easily somehow turn deadly.
Narrow minded bullshit.
Oh look, someone who can see the forest despite the trees!
It's no worse.
What a crock of shit. Let me know how third party voting and making the government responsible to you goes. By the way, there's 50 morons waving flags and thanking jesus for ever-expanding federal powers and supporting a constitutional amendment outlawing flag-burning, at this very moment while you're on here spewing bullshit about personal responsibility; I'm sorry, but I'm not responsible for them or the idiots they elect.
You think wasting a vote on someone who won't win is part of the fucking solution?
I don't know if you realize this, but we have a 2 party system. Every four years, we're faced with a decision between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. The government is not accountable to us, so long as they're getting the terrorists.
Please don't confuse us with our government. We're as fucking dumbstruck and horrified with this as you are. Just...wtf?
The fuck?
No, god is more like a government. Satan is the unsung hero of the bible, the one guy who had the cojones to stand up to god's egotistical tyrannical bullshit.
We fucking know; you're preaching to the choir. The problem is that for every one of us there are 10 hillbillies with 15 kids each, waving their flags and saying "this is 'murica, you don't like it, you can get out."
So, uh, if you won't actually read the evidence, how can any possible amount of evidence convince you?
That's pretty indicative of the mindset of vehement 'deniers.' Like any other debate, anyone with a moderate, thought-out opinion gets shouted down for being an idiot for having the audacity to think rationally instead of getting caught up in the hype, fear-mongering, and knee-jerking.
All guns are always loaded.
You can object all you want, the fact is that they aren't running around killing homosexuals and nonbelievers (your spanish inquisition link is out) or burning people they think are practicing dark magic (so much for salem witch trials.) You have a piont with the crusades, maybe, because Dubya has said God told him to invade Iraq, however, the fact that Dubya did it in modern times makes it a bit more pointy. Thirty years' war you may also have a point (see Iraq,) and if you're going to go with slavery you might as well indict all caucasians.
Whether you want to believe it or not, Christians today are less violent than those that came before them by a few orders of magnitude. That doesn't mean they're not still batshit crazy, stupid, and bass-ackward, but if you're going to judge people by things other people did hundreds of years before their birth because they share a label, you're fucking retarded.
It's akin to blasting modern-day Americans for killing Injuns, having slaves, or Jim Crowe laws (at least for those of us who weren't born yet). Does it have an impact? Yes. Does pointing to things that happened before anyone living was ever born make your case stronger? Maybe, but not as much as pointing out the idiotic things Americans do today.
Yeah, the atheists came out in full force in Cali to vote for prop 8 in response to the gays voting for a constitutional amendment against atheist churches.
Look, I don't like religion any more than you do, but I'm pretty sure he's talking about this century.
Exactly.
I voted for him as the lesser of two evils the first time around.
Unless you think that porn sites make up less than 1% of the internet, the percentage won't dispell the idea behind this article. Further, deliberateness is irrelevant.
I'm going to go with "probably not."
Assuming that porn sites make up > 1% of all websites (a pretty safe assumption,) then the ratio of (infected regular sites/uninfected regular) sites is still higher than that of porn sites.