Slashdot Mirror


Indian Government Threatens RIM, Skype With Ban

gauharjk writes "India's Department of Telecommunications has been asked by the government to serve a notice to Skype and Research In Motion to ensure that their email and other data services comply with formats that can be read by security and intelligence agencies, or face a ban in India if they do not comply within 15 days. A similar notice is also being sent to Google, asking it to provide access to content on Gmail in a readable format."

281 comments

  1. This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The terrorists used mobile phones and tools like Google Earth to plan, coordinate and execute the operations, India and Israel have been howling about those tools ever since.

    1. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by kawabago · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bank robbers usually escape in cars so maybe we should ban automobiles to cut down on the number of bank robberies! Its' the same logic.

    2. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by discord5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bank robbers usually escape in cars so maybe we should ban automobiles to cut down on the number of bank robberies! Its' the same logic.

      Why is it always cars for the analogies? Why not ducks? Or oranges?

    3. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bank robbers don't kill 175 and wound 308 people.

      Furthermore, cars are regulated, stealing a car to commit a felony is an extra felony, driving a car to take someone else to a bank robbery is a felony.

    4. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is it always cars for the analogies? Why not ducks? Or oranges?

      It's not easy for a bank robber to escape on a duck.

    5. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by agent_vee · · Score: 1

      Because using ducks or oranges in a bank heist would be too hard to understand.

    6. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the reason behind the license plate. If a car is used in a crime it simplifies locating the registered owner of the vehicle.

    7. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by eihab · · Score: 1

      Why is it always cars for the analogies? Why not ducks? Or oranges?

      Why that's like asking a NASCAR engineer why do they need engines with extremely radical cam profiles!

      P.S.: The joke is probably funnier if you are like me and know nothing about cars.

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    8. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by dunng808 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why is it always cars for the analogies? Why not ducks? Or oranges?

      Fair enough. How about this:

      Bank robbers usually duck when police shoot at them, so we should kill all ducks and serve Canard a l'Orange in prison.

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    9. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by bpsbr_ernie · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, because it would be difficult to drive away from a bank robbery on a duck or orange?

    10. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not if the vehicle is stolen, or the license plate is stolen or forged.

    11. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by XSpud · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not easy for a bank robber to escape on a duck.

      Are you sure? AFAIK no bank robber has ever been caught when escaping on a duck.

    12. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by ghee22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bank robbers usually escape in cars so maybe we should ban automobiles to cut down on the number of bank robberies! Its' the same logic.

      To be fair, the automobiles have 15 days to comply with publishing who is in the car and coordinates of all travel.

      --
      "Persistence is annoying success." - ghee22 11:28:1999 - 10:53:PM
    13. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? AFAIK no bank robber has ever been caught when escaping on a duck.

      You make a good point there.

    14. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Bank robbers usually duck when police shoot at them, so we should kill all ducks and serve Canard a l'Orange in prison.

      I hereby invoke Ramsey's Law - in any online discussion about ducks it's inevitable that at some point someone will bring up foul 70's French cuisine!

    15. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Orange you glad you chose a car for your last heist?

    16. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by daremonai · · Score: 1

      s^foul^fowl^

    17. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Not really - cars used in robberies are generally, where i live at least, jacked shortly before the heist and then torched somewhere secluded together with other evidence before a quick switch into another vehicle. Sort of like a real-life pay-n-spray.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    18. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why is it always cars for the analogies?

      It's easy to make a car analogy that sounds right, so you get modded up. Then the guy that actually understands how digital technology works can correct you and then HE gets modded up. If a good metaphor was used, only one guy would get modded up. It's a win-win!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    19. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Caledfwlch · · Score: 2, Informative

      So they want content in a readable format, are they going to prohibit VPNs? I'm sure there will be an outcry from all the companies outsourcing to their country. Anyway there will always be a way to hide information not matter how much they legislate.

      --
      These views express my own personal opinions, not those of the other voices in my head
    20. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by DittoBox · · Score: 1, Funny

      What is the air speed velocity of an unladen duck?

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    21. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      I think that you are either misunderstanding the point or trying to mislead us.
      Everybody knows that oranges are the superior escape vehicle.
      Ducks, on the other hand, are just a tool for terrorists.

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    22. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? AFAIK no bank robber has ever been caught when escaping on a duck.

      You make a good point there.

      Quick, someone get me the fastest duck in town! I've got a full proof plan to get rich.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    23. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1, Funny

      What is the air speed velocity of an unladen duck?

      Is that an African duck or a European duck?

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    24. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck India.

    25. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I've got a full proof plan to get rich."

      Yep, full proof, alright. 200 proof, for sure.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is easy. Governments can just pass no-tint laws and must-have-windows laws, and the identity of the people in the vehicle will be transparent.

    27. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not easy for a bank robber to escape on a duck.

      Are you sure? AFAIK no bank robber has ever been caught when escaping on a duck.

      This is why I love the slash.dot crowd!

    28. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because using ducks or oranges in a bank heist would be too hard to understand.

      Yeah, but wouldn't that be awesome?

      ROBBER: OK, everybody on the floor- I have a duck here, and I'm not afraid to use it!
      TELLER: Umm... [trembling] Uh... um OK... [looks around nervously]
      ROBBER: [Hurls orange netted plastic bag at teller] Now fill this! Now! And no dye packs! [Waves duck threateningly]
      DUCK: [struggling] Quack! Quack quack!
      TELLER: Yes sir, whatever you say... [frantically starts packing the bag with oranges]
      DUCK: Quack!
      Suddenly a loud alarm pierces the air. The robber jumps onto the counter and grabs the bag; loose oranges fly everywhere. He makes a mad dash for the exit. but finds that the doors are locked.
      ROBBER: Fuck!
      Kicks door repeatedly, then swings the bag of oranges at the glass; which disintegrates in an explosion of glass shards. A dye pack hidden among the oranges goes off.
      ROBBER: You fuckers, I said no dye packs!
      TELLER: Uh, honest, I didn't know... well look sir, it's orange dye anyway...
      Robber throws duck at the teller, then struggles through the broken glass.
      DUCK: [enraged] Quack quack! Quack quack! Quack quack quack!
      TELLER: [screaming] Aaagh- it's a duck on me! Help! Duck! Please!

      New scene. Several minutes later- first police officer enters the bank.
      COP: Watch it- duck! [Pulls pistol, fires round at duck]
      DUCK: Quack!
      Several seconds of silence...
      TELLER #2: Wow- thanks... what a relief! How did this guy get his hands on a duck anyway?
      COP: We try to stop them when they go through the airports, but now they're starting to hide the ducks up their asses as they go through security.
      TELLER #2 What do you do when you find someone trying to sneak a duck into the country?
      COP: Well, the first thing you need to do is get some Dawn dishwashing detergent...

    29. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      therefore it becomes a double dog felony, thus leading to the possibility of a triple felony. Sometimes criminals go right for the throat with a triple dog felony though!

    30. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right but you didn't explain why the orange is superior. Let me explain it this way. An orange, being round in shape, has a much better aerodynamic shape- Like a sports car! A duck on the other hand has the cross section of a Mack truck. While you pointed out that no one has ever gotten away while trying to escape on a duck, thousands have been caught fleeing in trucks. Authorities reading this are now wise to your antics.

      btw, don't try escaping in an orange car, or a truck full of oranges!

      Now do you see why we use car analogies?

    31. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear the terrorists also ate food and used toilet paper. Guess we're pretty fucked now!

      Perhaps the government of India could get a little more worried about why 300,000ish children under 5 die from preventable diseases like dysentery EVERY YEAR and less about a handful of people being killed by extremists.

      Sources:

      WHO Mortality Fact Sheet - India: http://www.who.int/whosis/mort/profiles/mort_searo_ind_india.pdf
      1.5+ million children under 5 die per year: http://infochangeindia.org/201006018321/Children/News-Scan/Lancet-incorrect-about-steep-decline-in-child-mortality-says-NGO.html

    32. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that charging terrorists, with extra felonies, after they killed a bunch of people, stops them from killing a bunch of people in the first place?

      People in you're universe must have no space-time continuum. Are you a creationist?

    33. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by fyoder · · Score: 1

      Bank robbers usually escape in cars so maybe we should ban automobiles to cut down on the number of bank robberies! Its' the same logic.

      Please don't give them ideas. Not so much banning cars, but requiring all cars to have kill switches that police can access like they do with their bait cars.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    34. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by davester666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, they must be banned unless the auto-makers give the gov't master keys to every vehicle sold. I guess in India, they do.

      Unfortunately, the gov't doesn't know which cars to drive away in until after the attack...and the vehicle is normally too damaged for the key to even work properly anymore...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    35. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the next step is to install GPSes on each car, as in Holland from next year http://gas2.org/2010/01/11/holland-to-start-taxing-based-on-mileage-in-2012/

    36. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      Bank robbers usually escape in cars so maybe we should ban automobiles to cut down on the number of bank robberies! Its' the same logic.

      Why is it always cars for the analogies? Why not ducks? Or oranges?

      Or clown suits which most robbers wear and thus make clowning a very suspicious metier for that matter.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    37. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by mpe · · Score: 1

      Bank robbers usually escape in cars so maybe we should ban automobiles to cut down on the number of bank robberies! Its' the same logic.

      Prior to the invention of the car they tended to use horses :)

    38. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Bangalorean · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Looks like slashdot is infested with disgruntled hypocrite American techies. I can't see any other reason why the above comment was not modded 'Flamebait',

    39. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those kids who die are poor kids with no money for buying political favors, the government couldn't care less about them.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    40. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by xushi · · Score: 0

      No it isn't.. they're just using that as an excuse.

    41. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by pwolk · · Score: 1

      [[ ducks ]]

    42. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, also, my tiger-repellent rock works quite well :P

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    43. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for them to create a new law that committing a felony with eyebrows or while not wearing a yellow shirt is a mandatory death sentence.

      It'll cheer up all the people who love to justify silly "X while committing a fellony" laws on the basis that it lets the cops charge them with extra crimes when they get caught.

      And anyone spotted walking around without eyebrows and wearing a yellow shirt could be watched extra carefully.

    44. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Let's fix the problem at the source and ban money.

    45. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Ni!

    46. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Cars? You mean these things with two wheels right?

    47. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those three things are impossible since they're all illegal!

    48. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Bank robbers usually escape in cars so maybe we should ban automobiles to cut down on the number of bank robberies! Its' the same logic.

      Why is it always cars for the analogies? Why not ducks? Or oranges?

      Why a duck? Why not a chicken?

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    49. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Yes but horses were banned in 1921 and look at the results! No more bank robbers escaping on horses!

      The system works!

    50. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      Which in turn would only hurt the very stupid criminals, and the law abiding citizens. Any smart criminal would be sure to disable the system before they use it as a getaway vehicle. And, there will always be ways to get around things like that.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    51. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another good point.

            AFAIK no one has been caught masturbating in the closet beneath the stairs.
      Must be a good place,no?

    52. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by nixbert · · Score: 1

      neither. its a peking duck

    53. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically it's easier to escape on a duck than an orange.

    54. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Bryan_W · · Score: 1

      So it's like when you take your car to the dealer and and you pay $50 get fed a line of BS about the car's computer needing to be replaced, and then you take it to the neighborhood mechanic and pay him $10 to replace a spark plug. If a good mechanic was used in the first place, only one guy would get paid. It's a win-win!

    55. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Yeah but we've set up a call centre for complaints about racism.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    56. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by asvravi · · Score: 1

      By all means, we must begin banning all automobiles that do not sport a registration number for traceability by cops. Oh wait a min..

    57. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      We have a law here in Arizona where any crimes committed while wearing a red mask will turn it into a felony.

    58. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, but old people driving cars do kill 9 and wound 54:
      http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/West/07/16/farmers.market.crash/

      Then, after seeing all the people they kill and wound, they say that it's the victims' fault for not getting out of the way. If I remember right, this guy pretty much got off scot-free.

      Why aren't there more protections in the law for this kind of thing? AARP lobbying?

    59. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, wait, hold it, is it more efficient to escape using a duck?

    60. Re:This is all from the Mumbai terror attacks by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      no no.
      That's the wrong way round!

      They should have declared that any crimes committed while *not* wearing a red mask (including travel to the location of the crime) will turn it into a felony.

  2. But if students in India can't access Google, by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

    How will they post their homework problems on comp.lang.c++ for us to solve?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Revotron · · Score: 4, Funny

      "please for help with homework, i give problems below. for all grade, please showing steps. due tomorrow."

      1) P=NP?

      2) List and explain three one-way functions.

      3) List five rhymes for the word "orange".

    2. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Jhon · · Score: 5, Funny

      "1) P=NP?"
      P="BOB"
      NP="BOB"
      if P=NP then write("TRUE!")

      "2) List and explain three one-way functions."
      Birth (just try to go back the other way)
      Sex (Well, this is kind of an while/endwhile or some other type of loop)
      Death (see Birth)

      "3) List five rhymes for the word "orange"."
      Door Hinge
      Beer Binge
      Infringe
      Dope Syringe
      Spine twinge

    3. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by sconeu · · Score: 1

      3)
          a) "Door Hinge"
          b) "Your fringe"
          c) "you're singed"
          d) "whores binge"
          e) "sore grinch" (?)

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by RichMan · · Score: 1

      "1) P = NP?"

      Solution number 1: N==1, any P

      Solution number 2: P==0. any N

    5. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only if you pronounce "orange" like a tool.

    6. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1) P = NP?"

      Solution number 2: P==0. any N

      N := infinity as defined by IEEE754

    7. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      Heh heh, you're not kidding. I work the support desk for a specialist software company and I regularly get e-mail that essentially says 'I don't know enough to do my job and I don't want to do the leg work to find out myself, teach me'. I usually respond as nicely as I can and provide some information to give them a leg up but basically I point them at a bunch of reference sources for them to read and leave it at that. I'm here to support them, not educate them. I don't think they know the difference.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    8. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you have got to be the stupidest person I've ever had the mispleasure of reading a reply for.

    9. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Hatta · · Score: 1

      -inge does not rhyme with -ange.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have solved homework problems for students in US through rentacoder

    11. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean, if you pronounce it like: "or-wrench"?

    12. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by neonKow · · Score: 3, Funny

      It does if you cock your hat to one side and saunter a little.

    13. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by fyoder · · Score: 1

      -inge does not rhyme with -ange.

      Depends on pronunciation. I've heard people pronounce orange as orinj. Still not terribly satisfying though, only rhyming the last syllable on most of them. Door Hinge is the best of the lot.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    14. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by strikethree · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Birth (just try to go back the other way)"

      Men have been doing that since the dawn of time. :P

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    15. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1
      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    16. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      arrange
      on a range
      on a ranch
      on a wrench
      ore rearrange

    17. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Birth (just try to go back the other way)

      Hey, here's a word of advice: don't ever google "unbirthing".

    18. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      when I get me the twinge
      from my ach'n beer binge
      got me hypo syringe
      full o'orange

      gobless y'all.

    19. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by vaporland · · Score: 1

      you did warn me. it's officially time to make google illegal...

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    20. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it varies by region, but I can say that I've heard very few people who pronounce the word "orange" as "OR-anj."

      For me, at least, it's a one-syllable word that sounds like "ornj". With a hint of a "ch" sound on the "j" depending on context. For instance, I say, "ornch juice."

      I don't have a bizarre accent or speech impediment or anything; most people from any region of the US think I speak normally.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    21. Re:But if students in India can't access Google, by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      You're just lazy, but don't worry, most people from any region of the world are as well. In New Zealand we barely pronounce our vowels at all, everything sounds like txt-speak to foreigners.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
  3. Hmmm... by Jhon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Glad I don't correspond with anyone in India.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Help desk too?

    2. Re:Hmmm... by mano.m · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure your communication is of immense interest to the Government of India.

      --
      Karma fed to this user will be promptly burnt. Be warned; be wary.
    3. Re:Hmmm... by Bangalorean · · Score: 1

      Yeah? Get out of your inflated sense of self-importance. The Indian Government cares tuppence about your whining 'correspondence'.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Indian Government cares tuppence about your whining 'correspondence'.

      If they don't care, then all the more likely they'll accidentally leak the skype and gmail keys to the world at large.

    5. Re:Hmmm... by somegeekynick · · Score: 1

      How sure are you of the Government in your country not reading correspondences via Gmail?

    6. Re:Hmmm... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Sure you do if you do IT stuff with outsourcing, contacting for support, etc.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  4. Hey, Little Brother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, you're doing it wrong. Just use MITM DNS attacks to use fake SSL certs.

    Love, China.

  5. India please do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we need more taxpayers here in the US.

  6. And I want a pony! by mandelbr0t · · Score: 1

    But you don't see me complaining

    --
    "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    1. Re:And I want a pony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, we just did.

      We don't see you getting what you want, but hey; you don't have a market with ~1 Billion potential customers to threaten anyone with.

  7. Really? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    It all depends to a single phone call or support request regarding a critical issue. You may even end up giving private/semi private info.

    Yes, the call centers in India. Wonder why companies panic when Satyam had issues?

  8. So what happens if google says ok!? by socz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does that mean they might potentially have access to my gmail? What about people who send mail to me? Does that mean that they automatically get the right to look in my inbox? What if they're spammers and they use that as cover?

    I don't comprehend India's reasoning behind this. It's a serious case of "Hey, you're doing it wrong..." What is the point of protecting (encrypting) or communications if we just hand over a key?

    I don't honestly expect G or anyone else to bend to their demands... but then again, most companies 'have a price' if it can be met.

    Finally, what do you think the likelihood of ANY company allowing India's DoT to actually place one of THEIR servers in the companies network?

    Rediculoussss! (*waves his wand*)

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    1. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Mumbai police found that the attackers had used illegal SIM cards not linked to their identities as well as SIM cards from other countries. So they are cracking down on SIM cards so if some terrorist enters the country they can track him and tap his calls.

      Then they heard about skype which uses IP so they need a way to tap that as well. Then there is google voice (maybe) and FaceTime. They have to crack down on wifi because it works a bit like cellular comms.

      You see the whole tracking of communication thing is slipping between their fingers and they are grabbing whatever they can, not expecting to get even 1%. I doubt it will make a difference in the next attack.

    2. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      RIM will probably tell them to go piss up a rope - they can't afford to lose all their non-Indian government customers.

      The other two should do the same.

      Speaking of which - all those outsourced-to-India types are going to complain when they can't use their crackberries any more.

    3. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by socz · · Score: 1

      You see the whole tracking of communication thing is slipping between their fingers and they are grabbing whatever they can, not expecting to get even 1%. I doubt it will make a difference in the next attack.

      And I agree with you. I always tell people, if I was to become a criminal I'd never get caught! That's what they "all say" right? But people who fall into actually doing that sort of thing don't actually think the way we do (most of the anyways).

      If anything, it's probably for PR and to scare people off from using those resources for 'crime.' I mean, most of them would believe it as long as they demanded it and the companies remain active in the country even IF it didn't happen.

      I've heard SO MANY STORIES from many people from asia/"middle east" that said when they first came state side, they thought the streets were paved in gold. I laughed because I thought they were joking, and they laughed as well. But because from what they saw on tv and saw in the movies, they believed it. So maybe that's really what is going on here. Because really, do they think they could control everything? They better give the pentagon some tips if they figure it out eh?

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    4. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by socz · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that just made me think of all the cust serv centers out there. So if lets say, RIM or G placed "one of their servers in India" so DoT can put their server in to monitor, as customers of say, Verizon or AT&T, could we say they're violating our rights to privacy?

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    5. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Nope. However, people who fall into "that sort of thing" and are able to cope with it have much higher tolerance to stress than your average middle-class geek - leading to greater risk taking.
      (Also, I'm not from the US, but how could you get the impression that "the streets are paved with gold" in the US from watching american television? Or does Bollywood portray the US like that?)

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    6. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by socz · · Score: 1

      At first thought, it was the Wizard of Oz. But after explanation, it was simply their 'perception' from stories told. I've been very fortunate to have many acquaintances from asia/'middle east.' Mostly egyptian, pakistani and indian. But to be honest, this isn't limited to people that far and in rural villages... although I believe the more remote means more believing crazy things. I came across some of that in mexico.

      Thank for the internet!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    7. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      So, you'd say that the internet could actually be useful to third-world people in the regard of amalgamating a more reality-based world-view, even though it's information and memes that westerners take for granted?

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    8. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is that RIM can't comply - their system is designed so that only the customer has the decryption key. The customer creates the key, not RIM. If India wants the key, they have to sue the customer, not RIM.

    9. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by socz · · Score: 1

      You know what? I don't know. Sometimes, believing an outrageous tale is better than knowing the truth. Sometimes.

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    10. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The eavesdropping capabilities are in place. They just want it spoon fed to them. There is also a more nefarious reason for this:

      They want overlap to other countries. They want Google to make a mistake and hand India's intel account information from other countries. They want RIM to hand them a backdoor that not just gives them custody of information in their country, but in other places.

      If I were one of the three companies, I'd just blackhole the .in TLD and the IP addresses that are geographically linked to it, and move on.

    11. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, I'm not from the US, but how could you get the impression that "the streets are paved with gold" in the US from watching american television?

      One famous example (though a movie, not TV... and yes, I know it was a book first): The dirt poor Joads from _The Grapes of Wrath_ had a truck.

      Desparate Housewives: On one income, everyone's living in a large house and has two cars. Even the one with more kids than I can count. Oh, and when one becomes _really_ poor when her husband is blinded, the extent of her problems is she has to drive to WalMart-equivalent to shop. (Yes, that's satire... you and I recognize that. But would someone from a third-world country?)

      Married, With Children: Same idea. Al's a shoe salesman, his wife doesn't work. He's still got a house and a car.

      Probably any sitcom not about the upper class has this issue; the supposed working-class as portrayed on those shows has an embarrassment of riches from a third-world perspective.

    12. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Al's situation never struck me as strange, but I always assumed they where meant to be stuck in a debt trap of satirical proportions. As for desperate housewives, several people I know live with house+car even though they have only one income and kids - however, they are in debt, and all have middle-class jobs like phone system techie/specialist and ambulance nurse. On the other hand, as stated, I don't live in the US (I live in sweden.)

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    13. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bingo. End-to-end encryption is why Apple still hasn't put a dent in RIM's enterprise market share. India already pulled this crap once before, and RIM did indeed tell them to pound sand.

    14. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You can do end to end encryption with an iphone too...
      It has a VPN client, and all of the other protocols it supports (imap, smtp, caldav, activesync etc) work over SSL.

      Infact i would argue it's better, because it uses known protocols, talks to a server you control (ie you can choose your implementation of the above protocols), and is direct from your telcos network to your network without any third party involvement.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    15. Re:So what happens if google says ok!? by Doches · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can I use pgp in Apple's Mail client? Can I install anyone else's mail client? Oh, right.

  9. Double or Politics? by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate it when I can't judge if things like this is just power-play or if they actually honestly mean what they say.

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
    1. Re:Double or Politics? by Compholio · · Score: 1

      I hate it when I can't judge if things like this is just power-play or if they actually honestly mean what they say.

      Does it matter when the end result is always that they do both?

    2. Re:Double or Politics? by kikito · · Score: 1

      Hint: they are politicians. Now think about the word "honestly" and how does it relate with them.

    3. Re:Double or Politics? by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      Even worse, they're "Indian Politicians". They make most of ours look like paladins of virtue and justice.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    4. Re:Double or Politics? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Probably they want the same Lawful Intercept powers that the US and European governments have.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  10. I like Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like Chinese - they are more discreet and tend to gain access to systems by means of security vulnerabilities which they discover themselves. Meanwhile Indians have adopted the western approach - if you are not sure you can solve a technical problem, negotiate with the customer.

    1. Re:I like Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. The problem with that approach by mollog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Bush administration violated a few constitutional laws in its effort to close the barn door after the terrorists had burned the barn down. They wanted to impress upon us how earnestly they believed in thwarting the terrorists, so they decided that we needed to give up our rights so that they could score political points.

    But, as everybody knows, the Bush administration had more than enough information to do the job long before the terrorists ever hit us. What was needed isn't more information, what was needed was better use of the existing information. (Notice that I'm not using the word intelligence. Clearly, Bush needed more intelligence, but that would not be forthcoming.) But we can expect our leaders to make lazy, self-serving choices rather than to take on the hard jobs they seemed to want so badly.

    India is an authoritarian state, perfectly comfortable with internal corruption and cronyism. This choice, to compel telecommunications businesses to open up their data for 'security and intelligence' agencies, will surely be abused for political reasons and its impact on security will be marginal.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:The problem with that approach by mrops · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I for one welcome this for entirely selfish reasons. More barriers the Indian government can put for running a competitive business and outsourcing, the better for us out here in Europe and North America :)

      When Company XYZ looks to outsource, one more check mark on the sheet, Employee can't use BB [X]

      More local jobs, yippee!

    2. Re:The problem with that approach by Securityemo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's this kind of mercantilistic selfishness that leads to the third world continuing to be the third world. Engineering, Science and Art is not a zero-sum game. And if you're a blue-collar worker, well, that's on the level of luddism. Better yourself instead of complaining.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    3. Re:The problem with that approach by stumblingblock · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My take on this is that it is simply sabre-rattling. India wants to gain some sort of concessions or financial consideration from these big fat rich American companies.

    4. Re:The problem with that approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insightful? RIM is Canadian and SKYPE is owned by companies and investment groups from at least 2 countries, one group being the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.

    5. Re:The problem with that approach by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Nope, that's not a flamebait. I mean what I say, even though I realize that unlike where I come from there's next to nothing stopping your fall if you loose your grip in the US. My parents have both been unemployed during most of my entire life, so I'm not exactly unfamiliar with a lower-class-bordering-on-middle only-reason-we're-not-poorer-is-'cause-none-of-us-are-drug-addicts lifestyle.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    6. Re:The problem with that approach by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      No what keeps the third world the third world is the lack of food, water, and the constant violence or threat of violence. The reason the USA, Europe and large parts of Asia have been able to focus on being the first world is they've been able to grow their own food in excess and drink plenty of clean water. When, as a society, you don't have to worry about where your next meal or drink is coming from it makes it amazingly easy to focus on progress.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    7. Re:The problem with that approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      India is an authoritarian state

      Wow you are retarded.

    8. Re:The problem with that approach by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      It's not selfish to want US companies to hire US citizens and keep them employed. When I hear of friends being laid off because their job went to India, I have every right to be pissed off.

      Outsourcing has hurt this country a lot more than it has helped.

    9. Re:The problem with that approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM is Canadian

    10. Re:The problem with that approach by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Sure, outsourcing only benefits corporations large enough to benefit from it. But eventually, as the standard of living rises in the area being outsourced to, the corporations are forced to move on and eventually the standard of living in the entire world is more or less on the same level, at least on the physical plane. Globalization, and the countries being able to fairly trade their natural resources, which would dump prices creating less jobs in the related area but much higher global prosperity in the long run, are the only realistic way solving the problem of most of the globe living in misery by our standards in any timeframe shorter than them reinventing the wheel completely. Your friends job is nothing compared to that.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    11. Re:The problem with that approach by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      The founder of Skype is swedish. However, it's now owned by eBay, and is based in Luxenbourg.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    12. Re:The problem with that approach by pankajmay · · Score: 1

      ...Outsourcing has hurt this country a lot more than it has helped....

      Aren't you the same type of person who shouts over the top about the virtues of capitalism? When the same capitalism turns back on you, suddenly its inconvenient!

    13. Re:The problem with that approach by cyanid3 · · Score: 1

      No. The Government does have control over RIM it seems. We cannot browse SSL on our BlackBerries. Everything HAS to be unencrypted. Perhaps the operators are crying about it and not being able to offer SSL. The Government will find a way to get what they want.

      --
      loldongs dongslol
    14. Re:The problem with that approach by cyanid3 · · Score: 1

      Skype is not owned by eBay anymore.

      --
      loldongs dongslol
    15. Re:The problem with that approach by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      So, if your friends are being laid off because their job went to community college kids for a third of the pay, you're not pissed?

    16. Re:The problem with that approach by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Ah - but that is a completely different situation. Either they're hiring incompetent personell, or your friends are doing a bad job. Since the first is probably more likely, the employers will either wise up fast or go bankrupt. I can't really imagine someone replacing experienced people for "kids" working a third of the pay staying in business for very long.
      It could also be that the don't actually need personell that is that skilled - your friends might want to seek a higher-paying position elsewhere. Real skills are rare, after all.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    17. Re:The problem with that approach by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Ah, I missed that part on wikipedia. Correction: it's now apparently owned by a Shady Finance Cabal of some sort.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    18. Re:The problem with that approach by put_it_down · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you talked to Indian tech support? Did it help in any way? No? Ok, then why give them any business? I might as well just not have tech support.

    19. Re:The problem with that approach by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      When Company XYZ looks to outsource, one more check mark on the sheet, Employee can't use BB [X]

      I like the your romantic picturing. Now back to reality. Companies will not be too preoccupied on matters concerning privacy of members of the off shoring company on which they dumped shit loads of badly specified work because they failed to organize back home.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    20. Re:The problem with that approach by Bangalorean · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Another round of howling from the American hypocrites - 'them Indians are steeeealing our Jaaaabs'. Look at the supreme arrogance of it - all jobs on earth are first American jobs. Anyone else who dares to do that job is a 'thief'. For arguments sake, let us assume that American jobs have indeed been stolen by Indians. But now those are Indian jobs. So, how dare you ask for those jobs to be 'stolen from Indians' and given to Americans now?

    21. Re:The problem with that approach by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised just how long grossly incompetent staff can keep bungling along...
      You'll only go out of business if you're massively worse than the competition, but they also hire bungling incompetents. Anyone who hires decent staff may offer a far better service, but their costs will now be higher.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    22. Re:The problem with that approach by Bangalorean · · Score: 1

      Most Americans seem to think that ALL 'big fat rich' corporations in the world are American.

    23. Re:The problem with that approach by ap7 · · Score: 1

      Relying on government intervention to make your business competitive rather than actually competing... yup! Thats pretty much the business model followed by the RIAA. And we all love that, don't we?

    24. Re:The problem with that approach by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      No, in this case the stupidity of the Indian government is at fault.

      If they create regulations that make outsourcing to India more problematic, I have no problem with being happy about the lessened competition. If it was a case of my country putting up more trade barriers, that would be different.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    25. Re:The problem with that approach by penix1 · · Score: 1

      But eventually, as the standard of living rises in the area being outsourced to, the corporations are forced to move on and eventually the standard of living in the entire world is more or less on the same level, at least on the physical plane.

      You have it backwards. Outsourcing lowers the standard of living in countries that are exporting in order to retain SOME of those jobs. All one has to do is look at the arguments the right is putting forward for blocking climate change legislation or the breakup of the unions in the US to see this in action. And the standard of living never will rise in those totalitarian countries due extreme corruption forcing us to lower our standard even further. In short, it's a race to the bottom.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    26. Re:The problem with that approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did. I have a degree in Computer Science, and I'm a quarter percent off direct entrance to the Masters program. Didn't help me, I'm still making minimum wage working for a TV station.

    27. Re:The problem with that approach by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      when my laptop was having a really wierd intermittent error.
      spent a while on the phone with him going through his checklist, he tried a few things I hadn't thought of, then arranged for a replacement.
      His accent was a bit thick and the line was terrible but the guy in question was helpful and polite.

    28. Re:The problem with that approach by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      It's this kind of mercantilistic selfishness that leads to the third world continuing to be the third world. Engineering, Science and Art is not a zero-sum game. And if you're a blue-collar worker, well, that's on the level of luddism. Better yourself instead of complaining.

      Actually no. If a country chose to enact laws that companies find untenable then the companies will locate elsewhere; it is the country's government's fault for chasing away the company and the results. If someone else views that as a positive for their country it's a realization that in order to prosper a country needs an environment the supports business; which results in an improving standard of living. Other countries either come to the same conclusion or suffer as a result of their decisions.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    29. Re:The problem with that approach by markvgti · · Score: 1

      Umm... India is *not* an authoritarian state (far from it). But corruption and cronyism are rampant.

    30. Re:The problem with that approach by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      You may have forgotten, but those same 'large parts of Asia' were the third world too little more than a century ago (even if using a Cold War term to describe the 19th century is bald anachronism). Difference is that they built their own society instead of waiting for the great white heroes to do it for them, regardless of any local wars. You may not recall, but at the beginning of the 20th century China was a fractured mess of warlords, sects, and factions. They had the cultural wherewithal to push through that and build anyway (despite a crippling foreign invasion and a bloody civil war to cap everything off). So I don't think these excuses we make for Africa and other impoverished areas are worth anything.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    31. Re:The problem with that approach by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Agreed... the only people Americans deserve to be angry at are their bosses, for outsourcing jobs. Here's an idea - move to India and get a consulting job in a call center teaching Indians the latest American pop culture references.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    32. Re:The problem with that approach by jamie(really) · · Score: 1

      Capitalism isnt the problem. Our fiat currency is the problem. If we were on the gold standard we'd have sent all the gold overseas, the dollar would be worthless, and US manufacturing would be competitive. In the absence of the gold standard we could actually require that China stops "managing" its currency, or we could just impose "fair" trade regulations, or best of all we could get rid of bullshit income tax so that the Chinese wouldn't want dollars: the dollar's only value is that our government will come to our house and take our stuff if we refuse to keep paying back the money we owe the Chinese bond holders. We are Chinese slaves. You have to admire the way China won world war 3 without anyone even knowing.

    33. Re:The problem with that approach by put_it_down · · Score: 1

      It's good that he was able to help. Awesome!

    34. Re:The problem with that approach by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's not quite the same. The RIAA/MPAA tries to get OUR government to pass protectionist laws to benefit its members, the record companies, and to pressure foreign countries to do the same. Since music and movies are big exports for the USA, this theoretically benefits the USA and Americans.

      The parent poster is hoping a foreign government (of India) will pass dumb laws that will in effect shoot itself in the foot, causing IT outsourcing to dry up there. Hoping a foreign government does something stupid to hurt itself, on its own and with no prodding from yourself, is very different from working to get your own government to do something to help you.

    35. Re:The problem with that approach by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      the honest truth, is the best thing that could happen for most african countries is for white man to take them over again. self governance is a failure is africa.

      I think this is frequently true in any country where there's too many ethnic groups that don't get along, and shows why small, homogeneous European countries (and Japan) are so successful. Internal strife uses up a lot of resources, and produce too much risk and uncertainty which make business investment and creation impossible. The USA is starting to have more and more trouble this way, not just from different ethnic groups, but also totally different ideals within (i.e., liberalism (or rather, the current American version of it), and conservatism (or rather, the current American version of it).

      The same thing is true in Africa. While black people may all look the same to white people, there's actually a lot of different tribes and ethnic groups there, and they don't get along, resulting in things like the horrific Hutu/Tutsi genocide in Rwanda in 1994. The same thing is at work in Iraq: there's 3 groups there, and they all hate each other. The only reason they were stable before was because Saddam was in charge, and ruled with an iron fist. No democratic government can work in that environment, and that's why all our efforts there will be wasted, as the place will just descend into civil war after we leave. The only way to bring peace to that place is to redraw the borders, so that every group has a separate country, but of course, the ones who don't get the land with lots of oil will get mad.

      I believe multiculturalism did work to an extent during the Roman Empire, but of course we all know how that ended. The USA is headed the exact same direction, very quickly. A giant, economically dominant country can get past its internal ethnic strife while it's successful, but when things go bad (as they will, since too much power concentrated in one place like that will inevitably cause corruption and collapse), then people will turn on each other and the country will break up.

      The reason white rule was successful for Africa wasn't because of any inherent superiority of white people; it was the simple fact that an outside ruling force, more powerful than the natives, was able to keep everyone in line and prevent any internal conflicts from escalating.

    36. Re:The problem with that approach by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add that, IMO, the only way we'll ever have real peace on Earth among humans is 1) if a big alien threat presents itself, forcing humans to join forces and put aside their differences, or 2) if a powerful alien species decides to take over the planet and rule us, the way Europeans did with Africa 100 years ago. Otherwise, the closest I think we'll come is if we carve up all the countries into small, ethnically homogeneous countries and have strict immigration laws to eliminate ethnic tensions. Of course, this is imperfect since different places have different natural resources, and the countries that happen to sit on large resource deposits will be targeted for invasion by countries with fewer resources.

    37. Re:The problem with that approach by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, if your company is big enough, you can just cry to the government for a bail-out check when your incompetence catches up to you.

      You'll only go out of business if you're massively worse than the competition, but they also hire bungling incompetents. Anyone who hires decent staff may offer a far better service, but their costs will now be higher.

      Yep. And the company that hires decent staff won't be able to stay in business long enough to outlast the incompetent, lower-price competitors.

  12. what do u think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    look here ever one is complaining, but what do you think of US government. Don't u think they have access to ur email and all those stuffs. Recent update was about ICQ chat going to russian company and US law enforcement agencies. http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/06/26/2149233/US-Fears-Loss-of-ICQ-Honeypot. Take it ever one has to comply with individual nations monitoring laws....

  13. Intelligence? I think not... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    The terrorists used mobile phones and tools like Google Earth to plan, coordinate and execute the operations, India and Israel have been howling about those tools ever since.

    ...and they are idiots for asking for access to like this. Anyone who is using services for sensitive information will just pre-encrypt, and they will be back to square 1.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Intelligence? I think not... by the_womble · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you think it is really about fighting terrorism?

      The British government justified spying powers "to fight terrorism", but they were actually used to fight minor offences (dog fouling, fly-tipping, government employee false sickness claims).

      Just like the British government, the Indian government cannot really say they need to compromise human rights to make it cheaper to police minor offences, or too keep an eye on people doing perfectly legal things the government and police disapprove of (which also happened in Britain).

  14. Does this apply to ALL accounts? by PerformanceDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Logically it will be impossible to tell if an account belongs to a citizen or a visitor (unless they add some authenticated sign-up procedure for users). So if I use my email account in India as a visitor, does that make me open to have all my emails read? I have done business in India and lost several deals due to refusing to pay the "special fee" asked by the buyer to make the deal happen. So with my present level of trust in how things are done in India, I can't even begin to imagine how the knowledge gleaned by "intelligence services" from foreign visitors will find its way into the Indian economy. If the providers cave in to this, then that would be an EPIC FAIL and I would have to stop using most of those services and/or find secure alternatives. So, this is not a matter of the service providers missing out on business just in India. If they cave in, India might still have the services available, but many of the lucrative business users in the rest of the world may well walk.

    --
    Meus subcriptio est nocens Latin quoniam bardus populus reputo is sanus callidus
    1. Re:Does this apply to ALL accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a question... I guess you'd track only your own citizen terrorists and ignore the foreigners on account of them being foreigners? ;-)

      Surely you _do_ realize that clear-text access to company communications is the basis for all successful industrial espionage, no? That was - unstated - the main reason why China and other dictatorial regimes like the U.S.A. - oh, i forgot, that's supposed to be a demockracy ;-) - try to control encryption...

  15. Governments are the problem, not the solution by VTEngineer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they have no right whatsoever to read email traffic. Terrorists have officially won as government is leveraging attacks to increase their power over all. Wake up people, government is the problem. Terrorists, even when very successful, effect a tiny percentage of a population. Yet, the government grows more powerful over all in order to supposedly protect the population. This is about control, not protection. Such a shame that so may are willing to throw away their rights in the face of terror. The terrorists have won. Now they are fighting over who will control the levers of power. The citizens have already lost all liberty.

    1. Re:Governments are the problem, not the solution by logjon · · Score: 0

      We fucking know; you're preaching to the choir. The problem is that for every one of us there are 10 hillbillies with 15 kids each, waving their flags and saying "this is 'murica, you don't like it, you can get out."

      --
      The stories and info posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
      Only fools would take it as fact.
    2. Re:Governments are the problem, not the solution by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      You could argue that governments not doing what they should do is the argument, rather than the existence of a strong government in and of itself. It could be that strong, centralized power removed from the constituents in a place like Washington is not going to give great results as long as human nature is what it is - but that doesn't invalidate government systems with shorter feedback loops, like state-level. But what should be state-level and what should be managed from the top?
      And so it goes. Any non-extremist viewpoint invariably boils down to something that can't be expressed with catchy rethoric.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    3. Re:Governments are the problem, not the solution by fyoder · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure I would say that the terrorists have won, or that the terrorists would say that they've won. I guess the assumption is that they're all sitting in their caves going "Oh, they are so afraid that they are giving up all those precious freedoms which we so hate! Hooray, we win!"

      When in reality it's an almost hopeless cause they're pursuing, getting coalition forces out of Afghanistan using fricken jerry rigged IEDs that have probably taken out almost as many of their own building the damn things as numbers of their enemy. Their death by a thousand cuts strategy requires commitment and tenacity and a lot of work towards a someday tangible victory, a restoration of the Taliban, and longer term the spread of their brand of extremist Islam. They have a long, long, long, long way to go before they can be said to have won.

      If every time we said 'the terrorists have won' a terrorist rolled his eyes, they would be less of a threat for not being able to see straight. The only winners with this sort of shit is the state, and you're right, it is all about control. But the terrorists are as fucked as the rest of the people. Well, perhaps not quite. They probably don't use Blackberries.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    4. Re:Governments are the problem, not the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay for abuse of power! Gently urging proper use of English is not grounds for a Troll mod.

    5. Re:Governments are the problem, not the solution by jeti · · Score: 1

      If the terrorists have won depends on their goals. Which goals did they state?

      I would say the governments have won against their citizens.

    6. Re:Governments are the problem, not the solution by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

      they have no right whatsoever to read email traffic. Terrorists have officially won as government is leveraging attacks to increase their power over all. Wake up people, government is the problem. Terrorists, even when very successful, effect a tiny percentage of a population

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    7. Re:Governments are the problem, not the solution by kronosopher · · Score: 1

      The real terrorists are the 0.01% of the richest people in the world. The American revolutionary war was fought by the colonists against the British central banks for levying unrepresentative taxes on the colonies. The United States formed as the only nation free from globalist banking influence up until the inception of the Federal Reserve. Now we're right back where we started except the bankers enforcement arm, the military industrial complex, has all kinds of fancy new weapons to oppress the masses.

      The previous poster, myself, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, etc, would all be considered terrorists by the fascist central banking regime which is now systematically and incrementally impoverishing the U.S. and everyone else(including India).

  16. Self Inflicted by Linux-Fiend · · Score: 1

    Awesome way for a government to send it's country back to the stone ages.

    --
    -Fiend-
  17. Requirements Engineering 101 by dasunst3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RIM, Skype, and Google's communications already "comply with formats that can be read by security and intelligence agencies" if the government wants to wiretap the suspects upstream of their devices.
    Can it be read? Print it out or keep it on the screen, your choice.
    Is it human-readable? Sure!
    Does it mean anything on first glance? That's questionable.

    I am merely playing devil's advocate.

  18. I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have outsourced some of our repetitive grunt work to a company in India. Once we got the glitches and language barrier out of the way, they have proven they can do the job so long as they are told EXACTLY what to do. Otherwise they will halt the moment they go off-script and not continue until we have made a decision. Sometimes I think they "get confused" just to get a break on some of the shittier work, but there's no way to prove this. It doesn't make them extra money to do this, since they have more than one job in the pipeline at any given time.

    The problem is that we have to use e-mail to communicate with them. It's hosted on our own server, and they use a VPN to access it. Will WE have to comply with these conditions as well? If so, they can kiss the contract goodbye because we are bound by privacy laws to keep this information out of the hands of third parties -- including foreign government agencies.

    For example, one of the things they will do is check to make sure an insurance policy has the same drivers and vehicles on it that we submitted to the carrier. In order to do this, they must cross-reference the driver list containing the name, date of birth, driver license number, and state of residence. The middle two of these four are considered protected information under both state and federal statutes.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      "we are bound by privacy laws to keep this information out of the hands of third parties"

      outsourcing to India does not involve a third party? sheesh

    2. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      "we are bound by privacy laws to keep this information out of the hands of third parties"

      outsourcing to India does not involve a third party? sheesh

      No. In a case of two parties X and Y, a contractor that

      1. acts on behalf of one of the parties, say X, and
      2. that is under contractual obligations to act within the same or more stringent constrains of X with respect to Y, while
      3. assisting X in performing services to Y (or receiving/handling services from Y)
      4. without an explicit prohibition from Y (or a legal authority)

      acts as an extension of X. It is not thus considered a third party.

    3. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by McGiraf · · Score: 2

      oh! that Xplains Y.

    4. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      So you'll basically whine in hope that helps your job security. I'm sure that'll work fine.

    5. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      You do realize that India has the notion of serving warrants, right? They can't snoop on you without a warrant, same as in the U.S.

    6. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      "we are bound by privacy laws to keep this information out of the hands of third parties"

      outsourcing to India does not involve a third party? sheesh

      We have a contract with the company in India. We do NOT have a contract with the Indian government.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    7. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      So you'll basically whine in hope that helps your job security. I'm sure that'll work fine.

      Nope, I'm not in the IT department. The outsourcing company really does make our lives easier, but what do we do if the requirements of the Indian government are in direct opposition to the requirements of ours (federal and state)?

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  19. RIM cannot comply... by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

    FTFA...

    The BlackBerry security architecture for enterprise customers is specially designed to exclude the capability for RIM or any third party to read encrypted information under any circumstances, the company said in 2008 in a note to customers. The security architecture is based on a symmetric key system whereby the customer creates his own key, and only the customer possesses a copy of his encryption key, RIM said.

    --
    "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    1. Re:RIM cannot comply... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Same it seems as a linux distro with gpg integrated into an email client.

    2. Re:RIM cannot comply... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      That applies to the enterprise customers. How many terrorist groups have set up a BES server? I don't think that the protections on general public users are nearly the same.

      Note that I'm not supportive of the Indian government's demands, but not because they're entirely infeasible, as some have suggested. They need to learn to keep doing some things the hard way.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:RIM cannot comply... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      That applies to the enterprise customers. How many terrorist groups have set up a BES server?

      Well if you've got something to hide then there's your answer.

  20. Acceptable... by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The proper response from Google should be a simple "Your terms are acceptable.". Followed by all IP addresses assigned in India getting only a "403 Forbidden" page when accessing any Google service, and all search results leading to sites located in India or operated by Indian entities being removed from the listings. For extra Bastard points, all e-mail originating from Indian addresses gets rejected and all phone calls from India get a no-service tone.

    1. Re:Acceptable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always funny to see people going "omg governments are evul" suggesting corporations should act both government like, and evilly. Idiots.

    2. Re:Acceptable... by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Except that the GP's suggestion was neither government-like nor evil. Where is the coercion? That is what is evil about government, and there is no coercion in simply refusing to interact with someone.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    3. Re:Acceptable... by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Extreme trade embargoes from the US would seriously hamper their economic growth, and halt the rising of the living standards in the country, a place where dirt-poor people really are dirt-poor. You can't treat countries, corporations and the relationships between them like people; that metaphor breaks down very quickly.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    4. Re:Acceptable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are we stopping with just India? Why not Australia and the UK, too--all the "internet policers"? 403's and no phone service--yesssssssssss! Firewall 'em back to the Stone Age!

    5. Re:Acceptable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper response from Google should be a simple "Your terms are acceptable."

      Google is a bug? That would explain a lot.

    6. Re:Acceptable... by neonKow · · Score: 1

      Then maybe they shouldn't be trying to throw their weight around. There's a difference between a request and a threat of a ban within 15 days.

    7. Re:Acceptable... by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      Suggesting a corporation engage in an all-out trade embargo is suggesting it acts as a government (more than it already does: most corporations ARE governments). Clearly americans haven't learned their lesson when they overthrew the East India company if some of them still think enabling a megacorp is somehow going to be good for anyone.

    8. Re:Acceptable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble being that the bastards demanding these things won't actually be affected by the fallout of Google doing that.
      They won't lose much on the vote front, either (internet penetration in India is still at around 4.5%; one of the lowest in the world, AFAIK)

      The only ones to suffer will be geeks like me.

  21. Well, Easy to solve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very easy problem to solve, just have countries who own those two companies, ban all imports from India, till they stop acting like assholes. I'm sure when they see their export earnings down the commode, they will think different.

    1. Re:Well, Easy to solve. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many people want their bananas.

    2. Re:Well, Easy to solve. by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      And their cheap tech support services.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
  22. The Fractured Internet by gavron · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's time to remind the world that the Internet is the result of US DoD research.

    It is a privilege to connect to it, not a right.

    India, China, and other countries with false sense of entitlements -- take note -- the plug can be pulled.

    E

    1. Re:The Fractured Internet by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
      Ok, sure *originally*, but that's a bit like saying that NASA can put conditions on people's ability to buy and drink Tang.

      Only a *tiny* fraction of the internet is government funded, created or even researched any more. If they want to prohibit India from visiting .gov sites, more power to them.

    2. Re:The Fractured Internet by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      No actually, ARPAnet is dod research, the protocols in the internet are all open and have people from a lot of countries working of them. The US also has no power to pull a plug, only 24% of the major DNS servers are american, if the US wants to get out of the world, they will be the only ones to suffer.

    3. Re:The Fractured Internet by epiphani · · Score: 1

      Wow, you obviously don't understand how the internet works. The US has no more ability to unplug India or China than Iran has the ability to unplug the US.

      --
      .
    4. Re:The Fractured Internet by russotto · · Score: 1

      Wow, you obviously don't understand how the internet works. The US has no more ability to unplug India or China than Iran has the ability to unplug the US.

      Actually, unplugging India would be fairly simple for the US. It simply involves submarine work. Disconnecting China could likely be effectively accomplished the same way, at higher risk; I don't think there's significant overland cable from China to the rest of the world.

      Iran, lacking much naval power, could not disconnect the US the same way.

    5. Re:The Fractured Internet by Bangalorean · · Score: 1

      "the plug can be pulled" Really?? Wow, I'm impressed. Do you work as a 'Network Engineer' by any chance? You'll rise high in your career, my good wishes are with you...

    6. Re:The Fractured Internet by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Wow, you obviously don't understand how the internet works. The US has no more ability to unplug India or China than Iran has the ability to unplug the US.

      Actually, unplugging India would be fairly simple for the US. It simply involves submarine work. Disconnecting China could likely be effectively accomplished the same way, at higher risk; I don't think there's significant overland cable from China to the rest of the world.

      That would in effect be an attack on another country's infrastructure though- the implication of the OC was that specifically because Americans invented the Internet that they somehow have the authority- and the *ability*- to "cut off" others from the Internet due to that alone. They don't, at least not any more.

      And while it would work in the short term- which may be all that would be necessary in a war-like situation- ultimately it could- and would- be worked around (*) as countries created new and more resiliently-designed connections and peering structures faster than the Americans could destroy them. Similar problems would apply to American attempts to leverage control over the aspects of the Internet that they still control, such as DNS. Other countries would simply set up their own DNS servers (possibly surreptitiously mirroring the American ones except where it didn't suit them).

      Ultimately, America *could* "cut off" another country from their part of the Internet alone... but not from the rest of the world. And it'd be hard for them to stop citizens of that country accessing their Internet via another country, unless they cut off the rest of the world.

      Except that I lied when I said America could even cut off another country by such means, because it would be practically impossible to sever all ties with the rest of the world anyway- even if they took draconian measures, they'd be unlikely to get all external connections.

      (*) No, I'm *not* referring to that trite and overused anthropomorphism "the Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." I'm referring to governments of the attacked country and their allies.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:The Fractured Internet by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      It's time to remind the world that the Internet is the result of US DoD research. It is a privilege to connect to it, not a right.

      That may have been true in the early-90s. Things have moved on *significantly* since then.

      However we got here, the situation now is that the Internet is worldwide and belongs to no single specific country.

      India, China, and other countries with false sense of entitlements -- take note -- the plug can be pulled.

      See here for why it can't, or at least not due to any advantage due to having invented the Internet. Sorry, but the genie is out of the bottle.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  23. Hope they ban landlines soon too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid call centers..... what the hell are those people saying.

    1. Re:Hope they ban landlines soon too. by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      Stupid call centers..... what the hell are those people saying.

      call centres are generally reached through VOIP

      you might be calling a landline number in the country of the origin but it's routed through a VOIP gateway to India

      this saves assloads more money to the companies who have outsourced their call centeres there

  24. oranges are evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people tossed oranges at a protest so we should destroy all the orange fields

  25. No Hotmail? by Teun · · Score: 1
    The first thing that struck me is the absence of Hotmail on this list.

    Could it mean Microsoft is already complying?

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:No Hotmail? by mano.m · · Score: 1

      Hotmail was built by an Indian, so special privileges.

      --
      Karma fed to this user will be promptly burnt. Be warned; be wary.
  26. What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there's 0% chance that these backdoors will be used for industrial espionage, because nobody in India is corrupt enough to turn classified business information over to someone's competitor in exchange for a bribe, righit?

  27. This is government searching peoples' houses by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    The Government shouldn't have the right to come in to my house and rummage through my letters.

    Of course, we have to remember that rights are whatever the people with the guns say they are.

    If Google is disclosing our Gmail to various governments, they better send each of us a plain and clear letter (a gmail email) telling us exactly what their policy in this regard is.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  28. Why a duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bank robbers can escape through the why a duck.

  29. The Terrorists Are Winning. by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

    Amazing what a little fear can do, isn't it?

    Pretty soon, if this cowardly trend continues, most democratic governments in the world will be repressive police states. Not because of military coups, but as a result of the citizens voting those repressive regimes into power out of fear of terrorism. This is exactly how Hitler gained dictatorial control in a democratic Germany. Fear the Jews. Fear the Communists. Look, “they” burned down the Reichstag! And, the terrorists (in that case, the Nazis) won. In the case of America in 2010, we now have the Department of Homeland Insecurity and the Patriot Act. An institution and a law we would never have tolerated without a 9/11-type tragedy and the fear-mongering, perpetrated by politicians and their corporate backers who find real democracy “uncomfortable” or “inefficient,” that followed.

    The best way to preempt a terrorist attack is through constant, consistant intelligence work. Most of it “human intelligence.” Once suspects have been identified using solid police work, the authorities will not need indiscriminate access to private conversations.

    What we need to do is step back, take a deep breath and get some perspective people. For example, according to WikiAnswers “There were nearly 6,420,000 auto accidents in the United States in 2005. The financial cost of these crashes is more than 230 Billion dollars. 2.9 million people were injured and 42,636 people killed. About 115 people die every day in vehicle crashes in the United States -- one death every 13 minutes.”

    Now, consider how many American citizens have been killed in terrorism-related incidents at home and abroad since 9/11. According to Information Please just 77. That's right, seventy-seven (that figure includes military personnel killed in terrorist attacks but not those killed fighting in Iraq or Afghanistan).

    Now, look back at those auto accident figures. One-hindered fifteen (115) Americans die every day just because they were driving, or riding in, an automobile. It takes less than one day for American deaths in auto accidents to exceed the total number of American deaths from terrorism over the last eight years (excluding 9/11). Of course, each of those deaths (by auto accident or terrorism) is a human tragedy. I do not mean to devalue them in any way. But, we must get and maintain perspective, not only in the US but (obviously) in other democratic countries as well.

    Here in America, we won't get our civil liberties out of the clutches of the fear-mongering politicians and corporations who benefit from a “perpetual state of war or the threat of war” any time soon. Take heed, citizens of India.

    --
    One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
  30. oh, please can I take that call google? by CFD339 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hello? Yes, this is technical support for gmail applications. Am I having talk with government of India?
    Yes. I understand that you are having difficulty with reading emails of your populations.
    Have you been plugging your monitor into the plug on the back of the computer?
    Excellent. I am so very sorry you are still having the problems. We are checking now your network cables......

    Etc....

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  31. Astounding. by OFnow · · Score: 1

    Isn't it interesting that the US DoD invented the internet and essentially gave it, free, to the world?

  32. RIM will probably tell the to fuck off too by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    The whole thing that makes Blackberry's so popular in the US is their security features. Not just with the public either, the US Government loves them some Blackberrys. They are a major customer and threatened to intercede in the patent case (patents are an explicit right of the federal government, and the law allows them to take them away for various reasons). There are several reasons they like them so much, but the security is a big one. If you look at the BB lineup you find they nearly all are FIPS 140 complaint. Now most people wouldn't give a shit. You can have superb crypto without that extensive verification process. Well, the feds care, it is their standard after all.

    So I can't imagine RIM is at all interested in weakening their security as it is a major selling point to their major customer.

  33. countersuit pending.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Skype, RIM and Google are contemplating a counter-suit against India's Department of Telecommunications asking it to provide tech support in an understandable format. HP has yet to weigh in on the matter citing a possible conflict of interest. Carly Fiorina said the Delta water crisis is a "huge piece of my platform," - as she passed out cake.

  34. BB Fundamentals by Khue · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am not getting the point here... A BES (Blackberry Enterprise Server) basically hosts email out of a mail store like Exchange or Domino. Conceptually, all BES does is provide end to end security from the corporate mail server of choice to the endpoint device. Why is it RIM's responsibility to make this more open for public use? Why isn't M$ being asked to do the same thing with their version of BES (Mobile support addin for Exchange)? This seems very odd and the article seems to be written from a 30,000 foot view. Why is India going after the infrastructure and not the source of the emails (corporations or mail providers).

  35. indian govt is a bunch of... by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    ...incompetent idiots.
    lots of its actions can only be interpreted by others to be flailings of a bumbling fool. recently they made it mandatory to give out your fingerprints to the census officers. well what good is a fingerprint if you lie about your name and everything else? and why exactly do they want fingerprints? just, you know, its like the rage nowadays!!1.
    almost all pakistani terrorist attacks carried out in india were the result of a decayed law and order system. corruption at the border, illegal gun trade, corruption at the local police station level, etc. hell they were able to just fix a red flashing light on any random car and managed to get into the fucking parliament itself.
    what google and rim should do is refuse to provide any help. and propose to close down their services in the country. maybe then the idiots will realize the stupidity.
    its times like these when i experience a burning desire to run away from this rotten country to us/uk/australia.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    1. Re:indian govt is a bunch of... by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... run away from this rotten country to us/uk/australia.

      And you think that it will better in those countries? Think again - in these countries your internet and phone traffic is monitored already. Think NSA ... Search for "nsa internet monitoring" on Google. And another example - EU To Monitor All Internet Searches".

      Is there any country left on this earth, where there's mutual trust between government and its citizens and therefor no need to monitor internet and phone traffic?

      The grass is not always greener on the other side.

    2. Re:indian govt is a bunch of... by Bangalorean · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Indian Govt. is incompetent and hugely bureaucratic - nothing new in that. But be careful what you wish for - it might not be fun to live amongst a bunch of pathetic whiners who just can't stop howling about "jaaab stealers"

    3. Re:indian govt is a bunch of... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      You know, the only thing worse than egotistical americans whining about "jerb stealers" is racist jerk indians whining about egotistical americans whining about "jerb stealers"

      Shut the fuck up already, or contribute something useful.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    4. Re:indian govt is a bunch of... by kikito · · Score: 1

      I don't see how they are going to be able to steal any jaab if they don't have proper access to email.

  36. It all means nothing by DABANSHEE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As long as as a Web based concern doesn't have a bricks 'n mortar presence in the relevant country/state & does no banking/investment in the relevant country/state, it has nothing to fear from the country's legislature/courts/regulatory regime except a jurisdiction based web-filter, a la China, Iran, Australia, & that's a problem for the relevant country/state's own citizens/residents to deal with or work around.

    Why web based concerns worry about the laws of countries they're not operating from is beyond me..

    1. Re:It all means nothing by Cimexus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oblig: Australia does not have a web filter.

      It only had an (unpopular) proposal to do so courtesy of a couple of retarded senators. Which has now basically been scrapped. The legislation never even made it to being drafted, let alone introduced into Parliament and debated.

      Problem with Slashdot is that people read a few hyped up, overly dramatic headlines and think they know what's going on ;)

    2. Re:It all means nothing by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      Read this and then post it prominently on a popular Australian website.

    3. Re:It all means nothing by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Oblig response: Australia currently does not have a web filter.

      The filter has been - at best - shelved. Not scrapped: a different beast entirely.

    4. Re:It all means nothing by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      The political reality is that in its current form, the proposal is dead. It may come back in a different incarnation (e.g. opt-in, or opt-out, which would be fine). But there is simply no way the compulsory filter could get through the Senate at the moment (and likely with an increased Greens presence after the election, the next Parliament will probably be even more hostile to it).

    5. Re:It all means nothing by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Yes ACMA is able to censor/take down/prohibit content hosted within Australia, or linked to within Australia. This is done under the standard classification scheme.

      I'm free to go browsing prohibited content all day if I want. I just can't host it in Australia, or link to it on a website hosted in Australia. Which sucks, yes, but it's not equivalent to a 'filter', which was the point I was originally addressing. I'll say it again - yes there are some restrictions on what you can HOST here. But there is no China-style filter that affects what I can ACCESS.

      The only access filter ATM is the ACMA one, which is completely optional. From your link:

      "In accordance with the code, ACMA has notified the above content to the makers of IIA approved filters, for their attention and appropriate action. The code requires ISPs to make available to customers an IIA approved filter."

      There's nothing wrong with any of that. People who want to use a filter can (and an ISP is required to make such a filter available). This is not equivalent to some kind of compulsory filter.

  37. INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by pankajmay · · Score: 3, Interesting
    However, lets put the main topic aside for a moment and allow me to express the blatant racism being practiced on this forum on every such topic related to India:
    • They stole our jobs.. those a$$holes: It is the companies in US that willingly outsource. These people are simply trying to eke out a living in what their circumstances allow. To call them names and wish evil upon them is simply not right. You have a problem with outsourcing - protest to your own companies. Granted some of these people on the other end of the line can be classified as inept - but don't forget that English is not their first language! It is your company's fault for allowing such a level of customer service, not of the guys providing them!
    • Those simpletons, they can only follow an EXACT procedure: Americans do not realize how much of their mannerisms that they take for granted, is not something that is common in the rest of the world. It is not their fault. Do these Indian employees need to make effort to understand American connotations more? Certainly. But do Americans need to put in more effort to make their language more universal especially when dealing with international personnel? Again the answer is yes.
    • Ha Ha... They have no original thinking, solve their problems in poor English: Every country has various strata of people residing within it. Can I fairly say that an Average American is a red-neck with a beat-up old pickup and homes with weeds around it speaking with a twang refusing to understand math and all? No. I definitely cannot. In a country of 305 Million in America, it is difficult to find one personality profile that fits all Americans. Now scale this problem to 1.4 BILLION people - is it fair to characterize a whole country like that? Absolutely not. India has 26 official languages -- can you imagine the cultural barriers that are already in place??
      Just like any other country, India has some brilliant people, some not so brilliant and a whole lot anywhere in the middle.
    • If India has such a huge population and so intelligent why isn't it a power in the world?: Simple answer to this POPULATION. India is also much smaller in land mass than America. With 1.4 BILLION people -- the struggle for resources is intense. People literally have to fight intensely to even eke out a decent standard of living, let alone living lavishly. . This is something Americans have a huge problem understanding since they never have had such a tremendous pressure on their resources. But when basic standards have to be fought intensely for because there are just so many other people in the race for it -- very little energy is spent on luxuries of life. This will probably even help you understand why your Indian colleagues in US sometimes live like paupers but otherwise earn handsomely. But please just stop and think how you would feel if you are an average academic performer, the best jobs have been strictly been snagged by so many people better than you and you are in race with million other people for one lousy job that is equivalent to burger-flipping in America? Will you still be able to achieve all that you do today?? DOES IT NOT FEEL LUCKY TO BE AMERICAN NOW, even if you are down in dumps?
    • Why not so many Nobel prizes from India, with such intelligentsia?: This is because -- the extreme lack of resources forces many people with talent to flee to a place where life is a bit easy. Where they can freely think about solving problems like P=NP, having assured that their basic needs and even many luxuries are easily met. That country happens to be America today. In fact, America should want such talent to stay in America. These people tend to be the great thinkers of our times, and their contribution usually far exceeds the cost of opportunities America provides to them. The founder of Sun Microsystems - Indian in origin. Most top Microsoft engineers - Indian in origin. Man
    1. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately, Slashdot is more or less a support group for disgruntled techies, and the focus of their ire for the past several years has been on outsourcing. Oddly, if you suggest to one of these "creative thinkers" (who laugh at the lack of creativity of their overseas counterparts) to start their own company so that they may then hire pure-blooded u.s. citizens, they'll balk. The irony is that these self-proclaimed paragons of creativity themselves lack the creative spark to be entrepreneurs. I believe money talks. I'm a small business owner, and I put a lot of my money where my mouth is regarding my ideas. Arm-chair "creative thinkers" just make a mockery of those with real ideas who've borrowed heavily from a bank, betting the farm on whether their ideas will succeed. Similarly, the arm-chair critics of how much indian companies "suck" should, if they truly believe such indian companies like Infosys are destined to fail, short-sell the stock on the market. It's a public company, and it's easy to short-sell (betting the company tanks). My guess is the same courageous types who thump their chests with ferocity on the soap box that is slashdot will run away with their tails between their legs when it comes to betting with real money on the stock market.

    2. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Bangalorean · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I second you :-)

    3. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Bangalorean · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have a lot of respect for America as a nation and I accept the immense contributions that America has made to the world in the past century. However, I just CANNOT stand the whining disgruntled American middle class techies who infest slashdot like bacteria.

    4. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      Considering the tone in the comments this was oddly ontopic actually.

    5. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, I just CANNOT stand the whining disgruntled American middle class techies who infest slashdot like bacteria.

      You should learn to appreciate freedom of speech and freedom of association, bitch. Seriously, if you CANNOT stand how infested this place is, why don't you hang out somewhere your precious sensibilities won't get offended? We can say whatever the fuck we want. And if you don't like it you have the liberty to fuck off and go somewhere else.

      On the other hand, you also have the liberty to choose to stay here and choose to say whatever the fuck you want as well, and folks like myself will either read it or ignore it. Based on your anti-American-middle-class "contributions" to slashdot, I'm guessing that your choice is to sit here and troll. Okay, I'll bite. Maybe I'll pen a thoughtful, insightful response, maybe I'll be snarky and hostile. Maybe I will try to be both.

      Either way, if you sit there in a recursive "whining about other people who whine" loop, you will get zero sympathy from me, and probably most other people here. I don't suppose you have something, you know, technologically relevant or insightful to contribute here, do you?

    6. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't suppose you have something, you know, technologically relevant or insightful to contribute here, do you?"

      Yeah, I can see how 'insightful and technologically relevant' the rants against outsourcing are, and the utter contempt for other cultures and countries!

      "you will get zero sympathy from me, and probably most other people here"

      Oh, man! I'm shattered. Pleeeease, pleeeease, sympathize with me? Pretty please?

      Look at the way the Grandparent's parent has been modded 'flamebait'. It was modded 'offtopic' earlier, and that's understandable I guess. But 'flamebait'? Smug hypocrisy at its worst!

      --Bangalorean

    7. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, unless you're going to sign in under your own account, I'm going to assume that whoever I'm replying to is just an AC looking to troll, because let's face it, anyone could sign someone else's name to a post here. Actually, Bangalorean doesn't need any help there, he has proved himself to be a first-class douchebag all on his own. I haven't seen a more appropriate use of the flamebait mod in a long time.

      I have a funny feeling he's not even from southeast asia, though. His english skills are about what you'd expect from a 33 year old, 300-pound virgin living in mom's basement in East Bumfuck, USA. He's probably here to dispense some more 3rd rate trolling while waiting for for his Star Trek torrents to download.

    8. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, unless you're going to sign in under your own account, I'm going to assume that whoever I'm replying to is just an AC looking to troll"

      Hypocrisy comes naturally to some people. Dispensing advice on 'Anonymous Trolls' while remaining anonymous himself is the first sign of an enraged hypocrite.

      "I have a funny feeling he's not even from southeast asia"

      Did you study Geography in the States by any chance? Bangalore is in India, which happens to be in South Asia. So, obviously I'm not from Southeast Asia.

    9. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dispensing advice on 'Anonymous Trolls' while remaining anonymous himself is the first sign of an enraged hypocrite

      As it happens I don't have an account here, and I have no plans to make one. Why should I? So I can become bff's with someone like you? Not likely. Hypocrite? Meh. Whatever. Am I enraged? More like amused. You're funny when you're angry. I'm more curious why you - if that is you - aren't posting under your own name anymore.

      Bangalore is in India, which happens to be in South Asia. So, obviously I'm not from Southeast Asia.

      Irrelevant. You're a pasty white 33 year old 300lb virgin living in his mom's basement somewhere in the midwestern USA. The closest you've ever been to India is jacking off to bollywoodhardcore.com.

    10. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by soppsa · · Score: 1

      Typical angry member of the brown scourge. I'd not hate you guys so much if you'd stop moving to other countries and driving so terribly.

    11. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by soppsa · · Score: 1

      lol angry pakis fighting AC geeks, love it :D

    12. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by soppsa · · Score: 1

      Sun was founded by 3 people, only one was Indian, and guess what, he wasn't the brain behind it, he was the business guy. Most top Microsoft engineers? Stats to prove it or troll harder, friggen paki.

    13. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing I plan to relay this post to your faculty members and students. Get the fuck out of America and stop sapping our education system you fucking supremacist traitor.

      Pankaj L Ahire
      http://www.cs.uri.edu/~pahire
      pahire@cs.uri.edu

    14. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm more curious why you - if that is you - aren't posting under your own name anymore"

      Well, enraged souls like yourself who happened to get a few mod points modded me down and got me a 'terrible Karma' which ensures that I'm not allowed to post more than twice a day under my ID. (if this is unclear to you, read the slashdot FAQ).

      "You're a pasty white 33 year old 300lb virgin living in his mom's basement somewhere in the midwestern USA"

      In that case you're most certainly a Paki - your real name's "Mohammad Hazrat Khwaja Kutubbuttin Bakhtiyar Kaki", isn't it?

    15. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, MotherFucker - PAKI != Indian, brain dead sonofabitch!

    16. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey there, 'father-of-your-brother' - don't you know the difference between a Paki and an Indian? Not surprising at all.... I guess the you must've had some bad experience in your childhood at the hands of some fat Paki...

    17. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by pankajmay · · Score: 1

      Good thing I plan to relay this post to your faculty members and students.

      Please do. I stand by my views and I am responsible enough to endorse them.

      Would you like me to give you their contact info? You won't have to spend your time hunting for it then.

      Get the fuck out of America and stop sapping our education system you fucking supremacist traitor.

      No, sir. That I am not. I am perplexed as to what caused you to be so angry? For just bringing up sane logical points?

      Can we keep this civil please?

      ... False Signature / Personal Info Posting

      Wow, that is low.

    18. Re:INDIA / SOUTHEAST ASIA BASHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, enraged souls like yourself who happened to get a few mod points modded me down and got me a 'terrible Karma'

      The bastards!

      if this is unclear to you, read the slashdot FAQ).

      Thanks for the helpful tip! I'll go do that right now.

      In that case you're most certainly a Paki - your real name's "Mohammad Hazrat Khwaja Kutubbuttin Bakhtiyar Kaki", isn't it?

      "al-Kaki". You infidels always forget the "al-" part.

      Wait a minute. [looks suspiciously over each shoulder] Who told you?

  38. And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_world, Govt officials address you as Sir.
    In India, you've to address Govt officials as Sir.

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    1. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously never went to the UK.

  39. You're wrong by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What keeps countries like India poor is the corrupt politicians. India can afford to build a nuclear arsenal but they can't manage to provide clean water to all of their people? That's India's fault and no-one elses'.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:You're wrong by Bangalorean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What keeps Americans in a constant state of frustration and agitation about 'stolen jobs' is the American politicians and bureaucracy. Wasting billions of dollars on wars, nuclear weapons, etc. etc. when the pathetic set of whiners that is the American middle class, continues to suffer job losses, recession and rising prices.

    2. Re:You're wrong by cifar24 · · Score: 1

      True, but providing clean water to more than a billion people is not cheap and not easy for sure. India's defense budget is significantly less than China's and only a fraction of USA's defense budget. National security is as important as the basic needs of the citizens. The root cause of the India's problem is the administrative system which is only about 60 year old. Our system has been evolving and the governments pro-technology attitude is driving the growth of India. We have a lot to learn from the developed nations, but certainly we are a lot better than some of the developed nations in areas such as health care & education (secondary education).

    3. Re:You're wrong by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You have to remember, in the minds of Indians, this isn't a problem, because many of their people are sub-human in their eyes, and they don't care about them.

    4. Re:You're wrong by Beliskner · · Score: 1

      What keeps countries like India poor is the corrupt politicians. India can afford to build a nuclear arsenal but they can't manage to provide clean water to all of their people? That's India's fault and no-one elses'

      Are you sure? The country has a GDP per capita of $7000 and even with a 50% tax rate that's $3500 per person, what on Earth could that buy? Nothing decent methinks, and certainly not that many nukes

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    5. Re:You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar to the way blacks, referred to as Niggers by most Americans, are considered little better than cattle in the USA? Forced to live in ghettos and constantly the target of discrimination, and even organized opposition by groups such as StormFront??

    6. Re:You're wrong by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, not similar at all. Groups like Stormfront are tiny, fringe groups, and most middle-class Americans don't do anything to "force" blacks to stay in ghettos. The ghettos are the result of failed liberal social programs like Welfare that encouraged poor people to not work so they could collect a check for nothing.

      In India, the untouchables are considered subhuman by all the other castes, and are treated as such. Despite Ghandi saying that castes should be abolished, most Indians still uphold the Caste system.

    7. Re:You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In India, the untouchables are considered subhuman by all the other castes"

      I know perfectly well that I was 'wrong' about blacks in the US. But w.r.t. Indian caste system, I suppose you've got that information from your "media". Allow me to tell you how it really works. Yes, in several parts of rural India, the caste system is still practiced. But know something? All this business of 'subhuman', and 'constant persecution' and 'forced to carry shit on their backs' died out several years back. Just like organized persecution of blacks died out in the US. And this might be news to you, but in urban India, the 'caste system' is certainly NOT an issue. It might interest you to know that we've had 'Dalit' Presidents in India in the past. The current Chief Justice of India is also a 'Dalit'. I could go on and on, but you get the gist - one's caste is of almost NOsignificance in Urban India. You'll be surprised at the number of 'liberal social programs ' and affirmative action we have for 'Dalits' in India. The richest and most powerful (arguably) woman politician is a Dalit, who has come up in life through this affirmative action system. Discriminating on the basis on caste is a "severely punishable" offence in India and certain 'casteist words' which were considered degrading have been banned by law (just like Holocaust denial is a punishable offence in Europe). So, to summarize, yes, the problem of caste still exists in rural India and it'll take some more time to get rid of it completely. But a little perspective is called for - and a little more knowledge of the facts. Your sweeping statements like are akin to claiming that StormFront (and several similar White supremacist and neo-Nazi groups) rule the roost in the US. (By the way, sorry to nitpick, but it's G-A-N-D-H-I)

    8. Re:You're wrong by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But w.r.t. Indian caste system, I suppose you've got that information from your "media". Allow me to tell you how it really works.

      That's good to know. I'm glad I was wrong about the scope of the problem, and that strong actions are being taken to fix it.

      You'll be surprised at the number of 'liberal social programs ' and affirmative action we have for 'Dalits' in India.

      Liberal social programs are OK if they're done properly, and don't have the exact opposite effect of what was intended. The problem we've had here in the USA is that a bunch of bleeding hearts thought it'd be a good idea to give free money to people who don't have enough, as if this would somehow turn them into middle-class citizens. But they attached a bunch of strings to the money, such as the stipulation that if you get a job, the free money goes away (and of course, the entry-level jobs available to them paid less than the free government checks), and that you get more money for each child you have. So there was an obvious incentive to 1) not get a job, and 2) have more kids. The end effect: a bunch of people with no jobs, and lots of kids out of wedlock.

      If India's come up with social programs that actually have the intended effect of leveling society and making things more fair, then that's great. I have no idea why we're incapable of doing that over here.

  40. YOU are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The terrorists haven't won anything, you fool. Stop repeating that empty-headed banality. "They" never wanted any such thing as you imagine - by their own words, they just want the Western countries to get their militaries, mercenaries, and merchant companies (petro-chemicals) OUT of their countries. They would be quiet happy if the Western countries maintained citizen freedoms etc etc.
    It's OUR OWN governments that have been purchased by the corporations for the benefit of the rich. And what do we plebians do? We roll over to have our bellies scratched and submit to the fear, eagerly accepting their dictates.
    We allow the rich to hide behind the corporate veil to rape and despoil our planet, but we lazily refuse to take responsibility for our own lives and livelihoods - it's easier to accept the fear than stand up and fight the class war with our blood, sweat and tears. We deserve it all, for being anonymous coach potatoes (so saith the A.C.)

  41. No worries... by raehl · · Score: 1

    This is easily solved when, facing the loss of the contract, your subcontractor just lets agents from the Indian intelligence service use the VPN from their end.

  42. the solution: ducks by DrYak · · Score: 1

    therefore we should make ducks mandatory !

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  43. very very serious problem by Max_W · · Score: 1

    I think we are facing a serious problem and the Indian government's concerns are well justified.

    No argument the Skype, Gmail, Microsoft's products, etc. are very good software. Excellent software. A lot of money and talent was invested in it. I would say even too much. No other software can compete with it at all.

    But we do not know what is inside of this compiled or cloud soft. We know that at least some of this global software was created with the financial and organizational input of one government, actively representing interests of a limited group of people.

    This software is getting overwhelming global recognition and usage. It may well be that agents of this one and only government can do at will a search not only in the communication messages, but at the local hard disks globally, just as we do search at the websites.

    Encryption algorithms are also developed by this body and may have invisible mathematical and code back doors too.

    Nothing bad is happening at the moment, as this government is good and benevolent. But what if this changes?

    Would not it be too risky to put all eggs in a proverbial basket? Not to have a fail-safe protection at all?

    Recent cases show that no other government cannot even remotely compete with this global information prowess of this one country (I repeat very good country, at the moment, no argument about this). Messages are being intercepted and read even before they are sent, even mathematically unbreakable encryption is broken in no time.

    Recent famous cases of information access hands-down superiority stunned and reeled some other governments. I guess it may cause new interest in creating their own operating systems, office and communication software, encryption algorithms, networks, and even hardware.

    Not to step on the same rake again it all should be open source and communicate between countries and regions also via open source protocols.

    1. Re:very very serious problem by Max_W · · Score: 1

      I do not even mean the Linux OS, as Linus Torwalds is also working now in the same country. And to look through millions of lines of code is unrealistic. Besides the compiler is also an issue. What is inside of a compiler?

      So, to have a safe secure computing the computer revolution probably is to be started from the beginning.

         

    2. Re:very very serious problem by exomondo · · Score: 1

      And to look through millions of lines of code is unrealistic.

      So it's not enough that the source is available to you, you need it explained to you as well?

      What is inside of a compiler?

      Take a look, it's open source.

    3. Re:very very serious problem by Max_W · · Score: 1

      Good points.

      What I mean is that even inside complicated mathematical algorithms there could be mathematical back doors. That all this probably should not only be understood, but verified rigorously.

    4. Re:very very serious problem by exomondo · · Score: 1

      What I mean is that even inside complicated mathematical algorithms there could be mathematical back doors. That all this probably should not only be understood, but verified rigorously.

      In an open source project this happens when code is committed by the community, there are always many eyes looking over the code. But you have to remember that as technology advances things thought previously secure - or at least 'secure enough' - may become vulnerabilities, just look at WEP. You can't write code that is 100% secure, there will always be vulnerabilities at some level and even if there weren't you'd still be vulnerable to hardware attacks at the physical level, such as glitching attacks.

  44. Corporations are the problem, not the solution by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    (Mouse trouble on previous post, trying again.)

    they have no right whatsoever to read email traffic. Terrorists have officially won as corporations are leveraging attacks to increase their power over all. Wake up people, corporations are the problem. Terrorists, even when very successful, effect a tiny percentage of a population. Yet, the corporations grow more powerful over all in order to supposedly protect the population. This is about control, not protection. Such a shame that so may are willing to throw away their rights in the face of terror. The terrorists have won. Now they are fighting over who will control the levers of power. The citizens have already lost all liberty.

    Interestingly, this edition of the warning also makes sense. Corporate media is able to get people so wound up about 'Eebil Gubmit' that they'll let nearly any illegal, unethical or even unconstitutional incident slide as long as it was perpetrated by a corporation.

    Governments are not the only major threat to life, liberty, family or democracy. Corporations, by the behavior of their managers and employees, rank way up there, too.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  45. So much for security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems this government wants to forget the fact that Internet security is a necessity. I don't want government agencies reading my e-mails. I want all my e-mails encrypted and no-one can ever see their contents. If the governments want to catch terrorists, they should try using good old investigative techniques. If they want to see my e-mails they must get a court order, in the same way as if they want to search my house.

  46. India to RIM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India to RIM... Thank you come again!

  47. I say, leave them close it by kikito · · Score: 1

    If they want lag behind technologically, that's their prerrogative.

  48. But wait, there's more! by FatherDale · · Score: 1

    We've also gotten notice that we have to show up at our nearest SIM retailer with proof that we are who we say we are and still have the SIM chip we bought. Oh, and bring a passport photo, please. This isn't the first time the Indian gov't has gone after RIM. Last year's attempt to strong-arm Blackberry was met with a giant shrug by RIM and near-mutiny by the financial sector, who depend mightily on the crackberry.

  49. Re:I'll be forwarding this to my employer -- NBCU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to copy the screenwriters for NBC Universal's new primetime comedy "OUTSOURCED" coming this Fall 2010.

    This could make a great season bridge premise:

    Having spent the first season training his new call center in India, can Todd (Ben Rappaport) switch to carrier pigeons for messages when their VPN collapses just as his call center needs to provide critical support for Mid America Novelties customers who have bought "Talking Billy Bass" which speak Farsi?

    Have smartfone - will travel!

  50. I hate to inform you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the U.S. Congress is asking for the same thing.

  51. what next? by sgurujee · · Score: 0

    wonder if the government can read the postal letters sent by Indian Post, FedEx, UPS et al

    Although I do not like it, I can understand the reasons and consider it a necessary evil. Not sure what prompted the government to take this step. India banned some Chinese telecom equipment makers a few weeks back and now this.
    Isn't US giving special powers to the President to get the kill switch for the internet. or at least moving in that direction.
    btw, US and UK already monitor the email traffic. So, this is not something new.

  52. And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    Every effort to empower common man will be resisted because legislative, judiciary, administration & corporations will not allow their clout to be diluted and they want you to be subservient forever.

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga