It's really none of your business where other people get their money. It's pretty much people like you that can't keep your noses out that ruin it for everyone. I couldn't care less, because I know anyone can find themselves in a situation where they are out of a job and I might have to fall back on it some day.
Welfare is a necessary evil because even the laziest people will start committing crimes if they become desperate. So duh the money has to come from somewhere, but we had better find it.
If I could figure out how to run a script on startup I would be fine with systemd. I have tried a couple times and failed. Otherwise it is just a few different commands to me.
The internet as a whole is a tool for quick mass communication. Did people really think it would be impervious to stupidity and incompetence? Social media, news on social media.. Philosophers have long written about the effects of incorrect statements affecting humanity like ripples from a stone being thrown into a pond. They hadn't imagined a world where the pond is electric with ripples traveling outward at the speed of light.
Basic on the ZX Sinclair, Basic on apple II+ (I tried to learn 6502 assembler at the time but sadly it was over my head), Basic on C64. When I got an IBM-XT clone I decided that C was the way to go, but I also dabbled with pascal because Pyroto Mountain the online BBS game was in it. Later in my post-grade school they used Pascal for the early classes, and there was PL/I, APL, lisp, C. In the end I got a job as an assembler programmer (how ironic is that??) which I picked up easily by then, and then I learned bash/perl/python.
I did a little more research and it looks like laser sensors such as lidar can be used for contour detection. They also have to be perpendicular to the object, so in order to avoid a pothole or stay in an ice rut as opposed to a lane, they would need to be pointed down directly at the road sufficiently enough in front of the car for it to have time to steer around the obstacle. The one IEEE study I found about detecting contours only had a summary in English and the actual study was in Chinese. Something tells me Teslas aren't coming with a lidar sensor mounted on a twenty foot pole in front of the vehicle and aimed down. I guess they could have a lidar array on the front of the vehicle pointed down. At least the first vehicle could try to gather as much information about the ice rut as it could while it careens sideways into oncoming traffic. It may even get some information about the opposing lane.
Sure public transportation is fine. You said Uber and Lyft. The important difference is that when people pay for public transportation the money filters back and it helps the city they live in. So with lack of independent choices to transportation it becomes like a tax for movement but at least with public transportation it is a tax that helps people. If people are forced to use Uber and Lyft, the money goes into a giant pit that helps Uber and Lyft.
They have at least thought of these things?? Wow, drink the kool-aid some more. As of a post I found from six months ago, Autopilot doesn't even work with the lane markings covered. Ultrasonic sensors only have a 15-degree radius, and have to be fairly perpendicular to the object they are detecting. They can detct solid objects *exist* but not profile a contour like an ice rut or a pothole. The ultrasonic sensor coming in the new Tesla array detects 360-degrees around the car but not downwards which is where the road is. The things that Tesla says is called 'marketing'. They use that to sell cars. Don't buy into it. There is no way what Musk is selling will ever be able to be used for self driving in all conditions. Furthermore, they still depend on people driving the car manually to detect course differences; a big problem with no solution in site. I'm not just skeptical, I don't see anyone explaining how these problems can ever be solved. This makes believing in automated driving more like believing in a religion ruled by televangelists preaching for billions of dollars.
And, yes, the links you posted are exactly the marketing I am talking about.
Is it me, or is the most obvious answer going over this guys head.. I'm pretty sure the most likely reason that people ask why they would want a certain feature is that they don't actually see the use for a certain feature. So what he is really asking is, "why don't people want the features I do?". This is why gathering requirements for software is actually a job in itself and requiring of skills. If this person has absolute confidence that their ideas are good they need to put work behind it, learn to develop, make alternative product 'B' and win the market away from product 'A'.
My point was that you can't judge safety from a car that is monitored. There was recently an article about how they still have to take control all the time. Therefore they are nowhere close to ready yet.
I have a pair of around ear headphones and ear buds. The ear buds I bought because I knew a sales person for an electronics shop that was basically able to sell anything 'at cost' to friends and family and they were half price.
It will be a sad world if people ever have to rely on Uber and Lyft to get from place to place. Personal vehicle ownership is important for freedom of a civilization. Tesla has not demonstrated that the sensors they are shipping will be able to handle all cases. Will they be aimed low enough to stop to allow a rabbit to cross the road safely or are we just running over animals now? Will they scan the contour of the road so they can drive properly through ice ruts or around deep potholes? I didn't think they had that kind of tech yet.
I guess that will come out in court then. That's a pretty big oversight, but a point that should have been brought up by the lab since they were supposed to be testing the chicken, not the seasoning in the chicken. Lawsuit should be against the lab, in fact CBC should probably be suing them as well.
Slashdot Mirror
It's really none of your business where other people get their money. It's pretty much people like you that can't keep your noses out that ruin it for everyone. I couldn't care less, because I know anyone can find themselves in a situation where they are out of a job and I might have to fall back on it some day.
On the contrary, reproduction becomes a huge problem when sex is the only form of entertainment that people can afford.
Welfare is a necessary evil because even the laziest people will start committing crimes if they become desperate. So duh the money has to come from somewhere, but we had better find it.
This seems a whole lot more complicated than adding a command to /etc/rc.local. Thanks though, I will try this.
Let them believe you have to wait for months for treatment so they feel better.
I have a laptop with a hybrid intel/geforce 555m and I have been unable to get it to work with anything beyond ubuntu 15.
If I could figure out how to run a script on startup I would be fine with systemd. I have tried a couple times and failed. Otherwise it is just a few different commands to me.
The internet as a whole is a tool for quick mass communication. Did people really think it would be impervious to stupidity and incompetence? Social media, news on social media.. Philosophers have long written about the effects of incorrect statements affecting humanity like ripples from a stone being thrown into a pond. They hadn't imagined a world where the pond is electric with ripples traveling outward at the speed of light.
Basic on the ZX Sinclair, Basic on apple II+ (I tried to learn 6502 assembler at the time but sadly it was over my head), Basic on C64. When I got an IBM-XT clone I decided that C was the way to go, but I also dabbled with pascal because Pyroto Mountain the online BBS game was in it. Later in my post-grade school they used Pascal for the early classes, and there was PL/I, APL, lisp, C. In the end I got a job as an assembler programmer (how ironic is that??) which I picked up easily by then, and then I learned bash/perl/python.
So will Waymo vehicles elect to stop for prostitutes or just run them over?
I did a little more research and it looks like laser sensors such as lidar can be used for contour detection. They also have to be perpendicular to the object, so in order to avoid a pothole or stay in an ice rut as opposed to a lane, they would need to be pointed down directly at the road sufficiently enough in front of the car for it to have time to steer around the obstacle. The one IEEE study I found about detecting contours only had a summary in English and the actual study was in Chinese. Something tells me Teslas aren't coming with a lidar sensor mounted on a twenty foot pole in front of the vehicle and aimed down. I guess they could have a lidar array on the front of the vehicle pointed down. At least the first vehicle could try to gather as much information about the ice rut as it could while it careens sideways into oncoming traffic. It may even get some information about the opposing lane.
But what matters is whether CBC lied or not.
Sure public transportation is fine. You said Uber and Lyft. The important difference is that when people pay for public transportation the money filters back and it helps the city they live in. So with lack of independent choices to transportation it becomes like a tax for movement but at least with public transportation it is a tax that helps people. If people are forced to use Uber and Lyft, the money goes into a giant pit that helps Uber and Lyft.
They have at least thought of these things?? Wow, drink the kool-aid some more. As of a post I found from six months ago, Autopilot doesn't even work with the lane markings covered. Ultrasonic sensors only have a 15-degree radius, and have to be fairly perpendicular to the object they are detecting. They can detct solid objects *exist* but not profile a contour like an ice rut or a pothole. The ultrasonic sensor coming in the new Tesla array detects 360-degrees around the car but not downwards which is where the road is. The things that Tesla says is called 'marketing'. They use that to sell cars. Don't buy into it. There is no way what Musk is selling will ever be able to be used for self driving in all conditions. Furthermore, they still depend on people driving the car manually to detect course differences; a big problem with no solution in site. I'm not just skeptical, I don't see anyone explaining how these problems can ever be solved. This makes believing in automated driving more like believing in a religion ruled by televangelists preaching for billions of dollars.
And, yes, the links you posted are exactly the marketing I am talking about.
Because something had to exist before they got rid of roads and made the Jetson's sky city.
Is it me, or is the most obvious answer going over this guys head.. I'm pretty sure the most likely reason that people ask why they would want a certain feature is that they don't actually see the use for a certain feature. So what he is really asking is, "why don't people want the features I do?". This is why gathering requirements for software is actually a job in itself and requiring of skills. If this person has absolute confidence that their ideas are good they need to put work behind it, learn to develop, make alternative product 'B' and win the market away from product 'A'.
Or may never.
My point was that you can't judge safety from a car that is monitored. There was recently an article about how they still have to take control all the time. Therefore they are nowhere close to ready yet.
I have a pair of around ear headphones and ear buds. The ear buds I bought because I knew a sales person for an electronics shop that was basically able to sell anything 'at cost' to friends and family and they were half price.
It will be a sad world if people ever have to rely on Uber and Lyft to get from place to place. Personal vehicle ownership is important for freedom of a civilization. Tesla has not demonstrated that the sensors they are shipping will be able to handle all cases. Will they be aimed low enough to stop to allow a rabbit to cross the road safely or are we just running over animals now? Will they scan the contour of the road so they can drive properly through ice ruts or around deep potholes? I didn't think they had that kind of tech yet.
Subway promotes themselves as the fresher choice, I would expect their food to be higher quality.
I guess that will come out in court then. That's a pretty big oversight, but a point that should have been brought up by the lab since they were supposed to be testing the chicken, not the seasoning in the chicken. Lawsuit should be against the lab, in fact CBC should probably be suing them as well.
It is obvious that it is processed. But that doesn't give them the right to sneak in fillers.
That would require people to not be greedy, which is a much taller order than expecting them to think for themselves.
Readers need to think for themselves.
Ok but are they true or false? That's the only thing that matters.