DISCLAIMER: USE OF THE FOLLOWING MAY CAUSE HARDWARE DAMAGE. I TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR USE OR MISUSE OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION.
Setting bit 5 of memory mapped address 53270 can cause chips to overheat.
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps.
We once raced to a state border to avoid being served with lawsuit papers so we could destroy all our working papers and then allowed ourselves to be served once that was done.
That still sounds illegal, as you could then be said to have known or had reason to know that it might be evidence. Admitting to a possible felony to the whole Internet is not wise.
We've already cured cancer IN MICE 1000 times over, too bad it is still a death sentence for humans.
I'll be impressed when people stop dropping like flies from cancer and being given a "choice" between dying from cancer or suffering with chemo (barfing and loosing hair) and then still dying of cancer.
but the flip side to that is that often the sensors need to be very sensitive to detect slight electrical signals in the body (pulse, brain activity etc).
Especially to have an EEG which would work on Bush.
"I hope to recover my reputation, but our friends all ran."
Real friends wouldn't assume someone is guilty and shun someone - especially on evidence so flimsy.
Real friends would try to assume someone was innocent.
Real friends don't run like than. (If he was convicted in a fair trial that would be different).
Bet if (when) he wins a multi-million dollar judgment his former "friends" will be back!!!
"Oh, we hate perverts, we were just being careful, didn't want our kids hurt, or our reputation harmed, etc, I'm sure you understand, but since a court has ruled in your favor we know this must be the very rare exception where someone isn't guilty...
Oh, and by the way, I need $80K for a downpayment, and you got $80M...."
1. One can't knowingly possess without acquiring. That is physically impossible. So one will still be breaking a law. It would just help stop innocent people from getting framed. 2. Possession would give probable cause for an acquisition charge and one could investigate. 3. If you have reason to believe someone is illegally acquiring illegal material (drugs, guns, porn, bombs, free software, Democratic campaign literature, or whatever is or will be illegal) - you can do a sting operation. No, that isn't entrapment, that is Policing 101. 4. You can feel better about locking up people who are convicted, since now you have a decent assurance that they are likely to be actually guilty.
It is possible to not carry specific groups, all three companies could easily block the 88 groups only and have not risked any legal troubles.
But eliminating more lets them free up network capacity for their own content and also allows them to keep giving people more and more bandwidth (got to free up capacity so they can offer people 100 MB which they almost certainly will within 10 years).
Someone got permanently banned from United because of a book in his baggage.
He was first kicked off the flight and threatened with arrest, even after getting that sorted out, United said he was banned for life with no recourse!
Now he's got one less overpriced airline he can fly.
But if we send you to jail, and try to protect you from other prisoners (which, believe me, we do),
You actually believe that?
Do you also believe in the Easter bunny?
Read this: http://www.spr.org/en/news/pre2002/doc_01_answerme.asp
DISCLAIMER: USE OF THE FOLLOWING MAY CAUSE HARDWARE DAMAGE. I TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR USE OR MISUSE OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION.
Setting bit 5 of memory mapped address 53270 can cause chips to overheat.
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Filter error: Don't use so many caps.
Most stuff on YouTube is legal.
People making fools of themselves in home videos, sometimes while on drugs, police footage of DUI stops (very funny btw) and other assorted stuff.
If all the illegal content went away, over 95% of the site would still be there and it would still be profitable.
This isn't Napster (old Napster).
The illegal stuff is on P2P anyway.
Ageist bigotry does not help your cause.
And remember, you'll either get old or die young! Which would you rather do?!
We once raced to a state border to avoid being served with lawsuit papers so we could destroy all our working papers and then allowed ourselves to be served once that was done.
That still sounds illegal, as you could then be said to have known or had reason to know that it might be evidence. Admitting to a possible felony to the whole Internet is not wise.
Couldn't happen...
Heck even in Vegas I can't find pizza after midnight.
And hasn't NYC's Food Police banned everything "unhealthy" by now...
Not even the Southern District of New York?
Same place that ruled DeCSS illegal?
I believe Slashdot (as claimed in their FAQ) uses a sort of hash to match IP addresses, which can't be reversed back to the original value.
32 bits - brute force search.
We've already cured cancer IN MICE 1000 times over, too bad it is still a death sentence for humans.
I'll be impressed when people stop dropping like flies from cancer and being given a "choice" between dying from cancer or suffering with chemo (barfing and loosing hair) and then still dying of cancer.
$800/month power bill?!
Even in Nevada (Nevada Power has very high rates) I don't even know of anyone that comes close, even with a 7 SEER central air unit.
Are you growing weed or something?
With that kind of usage, I'd expect the DEA to come visit to make sure you're not!
but the flip side to that is that often the sensors need to be very sensitive to detect slight electrical signals in the body (pulse, brain activity etc).
Especially to have an EEG which would work on Bush.
Your are quite correct, unless you live in a house with a home owners' association or have a mobile home where you own the house but not the land.
HOA = asshole neighbors with the power to foreclose and sell your house.
"I hope to recover my reputation, but our friends all ran."
Real friends wouldn't assume someone is guilty and shun someone - especially on evidence so flimsy.
Real friends would try to assume someone was innocent.
Real friends don't run like than. (If he was convicted in a fair trial that would be different).
Bet if (when) he wins a multi-million dollar judgment his former "friends" will be back!!!
"Oh, we hate perverts, we were just being careful, didn't want our kids hurt, or our reputation harmed, etc, I'm sure you understand, but since a court has ruled in your favor we know this must be the very rare exception where someone isn't guilty...
Oh, and by the way, I need $80K for a downpayment, and you got $80M...."
1. One can't knowingly possess without acquiring. That is physically impossible. So one will still be breaking a law. It would just help stop innocent people from getting framed.
2. Possession would give probable cause for an acquisition charge and one could investigate.
3. If you have reason to believe someone is illegally acquiring illegal material (drugs, guns, porn, bombs, free software, Democratic campaign literature, or whatever is or will be illegal) - you can do a sting operation. No, that isn't entrapment, that is Policing 101.
4. You can feel better about locking up people who are convicted, since now you have a decent assurance that they are likely to be actually guilty.
The drives will also tend to become rather warm and stay that way for too long.
Huh? If a drive burns out just from continous usage it is junk to begin with.
File servers are often in continous usage with a lot of seeking, at least dd will do minium seeking (sequential access).
In the same way that barring people from voting, after they have served their sentence, is also morally questionable.
They do that so they can have a population that will vote for the same laws and the same people.
"Loading the dice" so to speak.
Only anti-drug-law people will be excluded from voting because of drugs - people who support the laws won't break them.
Same with everything else.
Also, the rich are more likely to escape prosecution.
So it helps the rich get more votes than the poor, and the Republicans can will yet another election.
Perhaps there will be a widespread voter purge to get McCain elected.
Except he was working a gov't job. At will doesn't apply, civil service laws do.
Ever try writing code for opening a window in Xlib?
Doing one's taxes is FAR simpler, the IRS rules are more logical, less complex and more sane than those for writing Xlib applications.
You forgot Windows.
It is possible to not carry specific groups, all three companies could easily block the 88 groups only and have not risked any legal troubles.
But eliminating more lets them free up network capacity for their own content and also allows them to keep giving people more and more bandwidth (got to free up capacity so they can offer people 100 MB which they almost certainly will within 10 years).
If you are an atheist, then YOU are the fool!
Don't let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory!
Now we will have to come up with another one.
Such as there could be a back door even in the open source code planted by the NSA that no one can recognize.
Remember that Linux security hole where someone used = instead of == ?
..heck, every time I buy a Dell PC i still have to promise not to export it.
Well Dells blow up, so they can be considered a munition and require a license to export.
We have an economy left?!
Someone got permanently banned from United because of a book in his baggage.
He was first kicked off the flight and threatened with arrest, even after getting that sorted out, United said he was banned for life with no recourse!
Now he's got one less overpriced airline he can fly.