Maybe they were trying to say it was better then Windows 95's problem of rebooting every 30 or so days automaticly? If I recall correctly, it was a bug ni Windows 95
Easy to say they had been running for years, when their software/hardware HAD been out for years. If it was a press release for Windows NT, it wouldn't have been out for years, let alone months in a final release state.
have you used the newnet ircd? i have. ive been using it for a while, i even setup a machine with 200 odd ip addresses and installed 100 odd newnet ircd's and hadn't had a problem, i got em all linked in a network situation, with hubs and client servers. i have had no problems with them crashing or playing up at all. ive also used other ircds' and i find them a pain in the pass to setup, some are fussy with time diffrences in machines, host names, ip address, long time to do dns and so on. I like the NewNet ircd, i also have a server on NewNet and the machine has never had and problems from the newnet ircd at all Regards, Alan Lee
Slashdot Mirror
To the land down under! We have had this for over 2 years now. Eat it up while you can;
WEB wasn't meant to be a security product, it gives the same type of security as what a normal cat5 cable will have.
Very true
Maybe they were trying to say it was better then Windows 95's problem of rebooting every 30 or so days automaticly? If I recall correctly, it was a bug ni Windows 95
Easy to say they had been running for years, when their software/hardware HAD been out for years. If it was a press release for Windows NT, it wouldn't have been out for years, let alone months in a final release state.
Lets say I have SSHD running on port 5422, will I still be open to the virus? Im guessing it runs on the standard SSHD ports?
have you used the newnet ircd? i have. ive been using it for a while, i even setup a machine with 200 odd ip addresses and installed 100 odd newnet ircd's and hadn't had a problem, i got em all linked in a network situation, with hubs and client servers. i have had no problems with them crashing or playing up at all. ive also used other ircds' and i find them a pain in the pass to setup, some are fussy with time diffrences in machines, host names, ip address, long time to do dns and so on. I like the NewNet ircd, i also have a server on NewNet and the machine has never had and problems from the newnet ircd at all Regards, Alan Lee