Slashdot Mirror


2.4GHz Wireless Video from Model Rocket

ExidyBoy writes "While the Gates Brothers fly entire camcorders in their rockets to record onboard footage, a cheaper alternative is to use off-the-shelf 2.4GHz wireless video senders. The Aussie RocketCam site has Windows Media and QuickTime clips of the spectacular results that can be obtained."

120 comments

  1. Handbook of Model Rocketry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Classic Guide by the "Father of Model Rocketry" Now Completely Revised and up to Date... This new edition of the model rocketeer's "bible" shows you how to safely build, launch, track, and recover model rockets--and have fun doing it. Whether you're a beginner or a veteran model rocketeer, the Handbook of Model Rocketry, the official manual of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), will become your well-used reference book. G. Harry Stine has been a model rocketeer since 1957 when he founded the NAR and started the first model rocket company. Stine's Handbook, after satisfying rocket enthusiasts for nearly three decades, remains the definitive resource. Recent technological progress has had a major effect on the model rocket hobby and sport. This revised and updated edition covers such new technology as:

    • revised computer programs that use improved versions of Basic composite propellant model rocket motors
    • recently approved reloadable model rocket motors building and flying large model rockets
      radio-controlled boost gliders and rocket gliders
    • solid-state, microchip, computer-readable modules used to measure temperature, pressure, acceleration, and airspeed
    Quoted from: Amazon

    --
    Your Friendly Neighborhood Product Placement Troll
    1. Re:Handbook of Model Rocketry by Enraged_jawa · · Score: 1

      The idiot moderator that modded this offtopic should have his teath kicked in with a steel boot. Stine's book is the gospel on the subject for Newb's (and oldtimers) in rocketry.

    2. Re:Handbook of Model Rocketry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I don't get that. I mean, it's trollish, but not off topic. Hopefully the metamodders aren't asleep at the switch.

  2. Poor Aussie by inertia187 · · Score: 0, Funny

    From: Anthony <xxx@yyy>
    Date: Fri Sep 12, 2003 6:14:34 PM US/Pacific
    To: holden@netspace.net.au
    Subject: Slashdot Is About To Strike

    I know it's not enough time to do anything, but Slashdot is about to link to your site.

    Enjoy,
    Anthony

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  3. The bad part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that even with WEP, someone can sniff your traffic and see your rocket footage.

    1. Re:The bad part by bobthemuse · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is an analog video signal transmitted on the same frequency as 802.11b, but that's the only relation. WEP doesn't apply. Anyone can sniff.

    2. Re:The bad part by fussman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      or possibly serve porn off of it :)

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
    3. Re:The bad part by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick! someone port GPG to analog wireless web cams!! I'll payapal you a buck. two bucks if it has a GUI!

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    4. Re:The bad part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see your rocket footage. A foot, yep that's about right...

    5. Re:The bad part by r3nt0n · · Score: 1

      WEB wasn't meant to be a security product, it gives the same type of security as what a normal cat5 cable will have.

    6. Re:The bad part by whitefox · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what she said to me the other night. So then I asked who you were.

  4. Cool, but nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While this is kinda cool, it is nothing new. Putting a cam in a rocket is the next best thing to being in the rocket itself.

    The thing that I would like to see is for them to have some degree of control over the rocket. Unfortunately (here in the US), and RC rocket is classified as a "missile" and is a big no-no.

    It's also good to see this hobby being kept alive,

    1. Re:Cool, but nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Video and Rocketry is not all that new. Many, many rocketeers have done this already. The Gates brothers get noticed for doing this because of who they are, not the innovation they bring to the hobby. Here is an interesting article on how to setup a downlink. Excellent information that brings excellent results. Yes, I've seen it in action. http://www.vahpr.com/atv/atv.html

    2. Re:Cool, but nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some nice video of launching here I see. http://www.vahpr.com/gv.html

    3. Re:Cool, but nothing new by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      I would argue that being in the model rocket is the next best thing to having a camera in it instead.

    4. Re:Cool, but nothing new by aussiedood · · Score: 1

      Say what?? What about my 2nd amendment right to bear arms? ;)

  5. Sure this is impressive, by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Informative

    But I still think that the project for that Linux powered balloon is better: http://vpizza.org/~jmeehan/balloon/ Though there is no motion picture, the still images taken from over 80,000 ft up are very impressive.

    1. Re:Sure this is impressive, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the truly lazy here is a properly crafted "clickable" URL. and I am posting this anonymous - I ain't no Karma Whore.... Well, alright I am but just not this time. =)

    2. Re:Sure this is impressive, by twoslice · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the properly crafted URL. What a maroon!

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    3. Re:Sure this is impressive, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather be maroon than a moron! ;)

    4. Re:Sure this is impressive, by barks · · Score: 1

      WOW! That's a pretty amazing project! Incredible article and well documented. I wish there were more people taking risks and willing to do experiments like this.

      I guess it all just comes down to time, money, and originality.

    5. Re:Sure this is impressive, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "maroon" was intentional; it's a reference to the Bugs Bunny cartoon character. Or at least I assume that's the way the original poster intended it.

  6. Torrents? by adamfranco · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Can someone who actually downloads these put up some .torrets? There seems to be little hope of seeing these already...

    --
    "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    1. Re:Torrents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm downloading the clips now (Sydney). Only getting about 2kb/sec from the server..

    2. Re:Torrents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, looks like the server is maxing out. Not getting anything... Please let up guys so I can d/l and torrent them.

  7. I toyed with this idea once... by TWX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... with my cheap X-10 camera, but batteries, rather than the camera, seemed to be the problem. It wouldn't have been terribly hard to launch them, it just would have been difficult to recover the rocket intact with all of that weight.

    A radio controlled car ended up being a much better, and more fun choice. It's probably good that this technology didn't exist at a feasible price point for me when I was in junior high school, for I'd likely have gotten into a lot of trouble...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by cbreaker · · Score: 5, Funny

      You purchased an X-10? So you're that guy!! I was wondering who their customer was.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    2. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by undef24 · · Score: 1

      I believe that upskirting has been found illegal in many states. If you are in the US, you may get into a lot of trouble today as well.

    3. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You just need more horsepower and a bigger parachute. Decades ago when I was a jr. highschool punk, I built a rocket that was powered by a cluster of 6 Estes "D" engines; it was 7 feet tall and weighed several pounds. It probably could have hoisted a small camcorder. It made a flawless gentle landing with a 48-inch parachute sewn out of plastic garbage bags.

      OTOH, you're probably wise to not put expensive equipment in a rocket, given that I probably crashed more rockets than I recovered back in those days.

    4. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by TWX · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Upskirting? I would have driven it into the girl's locker room. Even losing the equipment would have seemed worthwhile at the time.

      It's interesting looking back on how things seemed when one was fourteen. Nowadays it wouldn't be worthwhile unless it was women's physical education at a local community college... |8^P

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You purchased an X-10? So you're that guy!! I was wondering who their customer was."

      And I was less than impressed with the women that came with the camera, too...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by TWX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Getting the rocket up wouldn't have been a problem. I once launched a rocket with an Aerotech Cobra series G engine. That sucker could be heard all of the way up until it fired its ejection charge. My problem, probably a lot like yours, was the reliability of the landing and recovery. Several pieces of rockets are sitting my rocket box, where one half wasn't found, and some rockets that became about four inches shorter are in there too...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, even the NASA has problems with this sort of thing.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    8. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by dylan.ucd · · Score: 1

      Dale is that you!????

    9. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by ouzel · · Score: 1

      How the heck did you get all six D's to ignite at the same time? We made our own rocket with a cluster of four C engines, but getting them to ignite at the same time was difficult - hence, it was hard to get the thing to fly straight up. Wiring the igniters to fire simultaneously was not difficult - the problem was getting the engines themselves to ignite simultaneously.

    10. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      It might have been mostly dumb luck. I did mount them on a custom fixture by soldering them to two concentric rings of copper house wire (not while they were in the engines, of course :). I think that I also taped them very securely to each engine, and I used far more voltage than the ignitors required.

      I was a little surprised that all six of them fired on the first try.

    11. Re:I toyed with this idea once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And I was less than impressed with the women that came with the camera, too...

      That's the Fed-X guy. To get the women you have to fill out the warranty card and send it in.

  8. liquid servers by chargen · · Score: 1

    Help me.... I'm melting!

  9. 2.4GHz Wireless Video from Pet Kitty, Mittens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay. I'll admit it. I'm the one who attached the wireless camera to the cat.

    But it didn't do any harm! Ran around. Chased something. Probably the antenna. The cat was perfectly fine!

    Well.

    Until I affixed the cat to a model rocket. But wow! That cat went higher than Armadillo Aerospace using a rocket jump.

  10. So what? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not like any of us are going to be able to see these videos. Maybe slashdot should have an option to block stories that link to useless multimedia (until Taco extracts his head from his rear and sets up a /. bittorrent server.)

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  11. Valiant attempt by Atario · · Score: 1

    By sending this out late on Friday evening (in the US), and routing the videos through freecache, I'd say it's a valiant attempt. But having several multi-meg videos coming out of Australia just overwhelms, I guess. Check back tomorrow, I s'pose.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  12. Is slashdot 2nd grade? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    a cheaper alternative is to use off-the-shelf 2.4GHz wireless video senders.

    And, to save money on the receiver side, just use off-the-shelf wireless video getters.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Is slashdot 2nd grade? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      You mean recievers?

      The word-switch doesn't work very well in reverse, but good try..

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    2. Re:Is slashdot 2nd grade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is meant to be funny. I'm surprised your anal-retentiveness did not say anything about the "video senders" (video transmitters?)

    3. Re:Is slashdot 2nd grade? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      First of all, calling something a "sender" is valid. Calling a device a "getter" is not.

      It's obvious that you were trying to be funny, but it wasn't. Do you realize how many people try to play comedian around here? A lot. How many are funny? Not many. And not you.

      You waste our time with this crap. If you have something that's indeed funny, and not some stupid change of word, then please share it. Until then, do us all a favor and spare us the torture.

      I don't know why you got all pissy. You made a really stupid comment and I made one back at you.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  13. I used to have... by Illbay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    one of these when I was about 13.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:I used to have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm beginning to like your posts a great deal.

      Keep up the good work.

      Honest.

  14. Why not just get a.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    X11 sponsor onboard so you can take interesting images of your neighbors in the backyard.

    1. Re:Why not just get a.. by sharkman67 · · Score: 1

      You mean X10?

  15. BitTorrent to the rescue! by Jaeger · · Score: 5, Informative

    In an experimental attempt to turn the Slashdot effect back on itself using BitTorrent, and exploit my subscriber access, I hereby offer a zip file of the website itself and all of the movies (three of them) I could get off the site before it was slashdotted into oblivion.

    1. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by loraksus · · Score: 2

      well shit. . . I'm impressed.
      Karma whore or not, thanks ;)
      Say, how does bittorent scale thru a slashdotting?

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness for BT, or else those vids would have been /.ed in no time!

    3. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, there's just something odd about using BitTorrent for a 2MB file. Maybe you should switch to BitSquirt?

    4. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by Jaeger · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Say, how does bittorent scale thru a slashdotting?

      The short answer is that we're about to find out. :) The advantage of BitTorrent is that everyone who downloads automatically uploads as well, turning the Slashdot effect back on itself, at least in theory. The only real concern would be the tracking server, since it's the only non-redundant piece of the network. So far, twenty minutes into the experiment, my tracker isn't breaking a sweat.

    5. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      Say, how does bittorent scale thru a slashdotting?

      Exceptionally well, so long as the tracker holds up.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    6. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I'm getting an error:

      "Problem connecting to track. 10061 Connection refused" :(

    7. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by davidpe · · Score: 1

      They were (and I'm in Sydney..) Thanks for posting em mate. :)

    8. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by snooo53 · · Score: 1

      Seemed to work pretty well for me. No errors. However, hardly anyone is downloading any of these from me which is odd... usually i'm uploading twice as much as I download

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    9. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by scottj · · Score: 1

      BT scales very well through a slashdotting. I've downloaded slashdotted files on BT at very near my max downstream bandwidth several times before. True, it's sort of weird to be downloading smallish files with BT, but hey, at least you can get the files. :)

      --
      .-.--
    10. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Say, how does bittorent scale thru a slashdotting?

      The short answer is that we're about to find out. :)

      It holds up pretty well...I had all of the files downloaded in just a few minutes.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    11. Re:BitTorrent to the rescue! by Jaeger · · Score: 1

      I'm shutting down my tracker now, since it doesn't look like anyone's still downloading, and I imagine the official site is fairly uncrowded. Thanks for participating in my little experiment. With any luck, I might have some brilliant analyses on the sucess of this experiment in the near future.

  16. Mirror by JeffSh · · Score: 2, Redundant

    here's the 11.5 meg wmv format video, 25% slowmo

    http://comcastchargesmetoomuchmoney.home.comcast .n et/serpentine5_slo_long.wmv

    1. Re:Mirror by JeffSh · · Score: 3, Informative

      oops....

      linky

  17. Gives a totally new meaning for by Aliencow · · Score: 4, Funny

    /()*!)(*%)(!/*%) NO CARRIER
    BOOM!

    (random crap so the lameness filter shuts up)

  18. I've done similar by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I launched a tethered balloon with a 450Mhz transmitter to transmit video. The 450Mhz stuff is better in some ways, it's less directional, and you can receive it on a regular VCR or TV card tuner.

    Some Pictures

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:I've done similar by interiot · · Score: 1

      Is that legal? I mean, it's similar to low-power FM transmitters, but now it's on the TV band....

    2. Re:I've done similar by po8 · · Score: 1

      Yes, at PSAS we're using 802.11b for telemetry, so 2.4GHz video would be bad. Besides, good cheap off-the-shelf gear is available for the 1.277GHz amateur TV band and it propagates well. That's what we went with this time around. We have used the audio channel with a modem as a telemetry channel in the past: this time we have an overlay board.

      Here's a page with some onboard video from our April 1999 launch. Be gentle to our server :-).

    3. Re:I've done similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably, but it's doubtful you would ever get caught even if you pointed the thing at your face. First, you'd have to be on a TV band that people around that area tuned into, and then you'd have to unlucky enough that they:
      a) recognized you or were recording when you looked into the camera and
      b) they were upset enough to turn you in or dumb enough to talk about it around someone that would

    4. Re:I've done similar by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's legal.

      It's actually within the 440Mhz ham radio band, which happens to completely include the same frequencies as CableTV frequencies, so you turn your VCR or Tuner to CATV mode and channel 59, and hook up the antenna You'll note my ham radio callsign is on the transmission. It only requires the technician ham license, so you don't have to learn morse code.

      You can get similar transmitters on the same freq with less power that don't require a ham license, I think mine is 250mW though (it eats 9 volt batteries like there's no tomorrow).

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:I've done similar by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      happens to completely include the same frequencies as CableTV frequencies

      I meant the range includes a couple channels in CATV, I realized this is ambiguously worded. Video channels are 6Mhz wide so it's possible to only be able to transmit on part of the channel.

      Of course it doens't cover the whole CATV range, which is several hundred Mhz.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:I've done similar by interiot · · Score: 1

      That's awesome. :)

  19. Re:MOD inertishomepa REFERER WHORE DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, so poor that I have to make an extra $1000/month. Poor me. Can you spare a dime?

    --
    Your Friendly Neighborhood Product Placement Troll

  20. Re:MOD inertishomepa REFERER WHORE DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahaha my heart bleeds i had no idea public housing projects where so expensive
    maybe if you got a proper job instead of wasting time on here begging with your shitty amazon links you might get a bit closer but then you obviously dont have any common sense

  21. Re:MOD inertishomepa REFERER WHORE DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be so harsh, his job went to india last month just like yours will next month...

  22. What's wrong "standards" for video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why Quicktime or WMV?

    What's wrong with MPEG 1, 2 or 4???

    Hell, have we all embraced Microsoft and Apple now?

    1. Re:What's wrong "standards" for video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering you can view them all in any OS, what does it matter?

  23. Another wireless rocket camera video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  24. *SNARF*! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But aren't all the Indians coming here?
    My University IT dept is wall-to-wall with MCSEs, and they're all Indian. And clueless.
    I have to ask all you Indian IT-types out there, just what's the point in memorizing facts for such craptacularly useless qualifications when you can't even install RAM or a hard-drive, or diagnose even the most basic network faults?
    What? You'll work for peanuts? Oh.
    "Once upon a time, there was a computer technical service department which was entirely staffed by experienced, computer-loving geeks. But then one day, along came a whole bunch of people with no previous experience..."

  25. think you could mirror it on a web site? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    So us people who access the net through a draconian firewall can enjoy it too.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  26. have this on missiles and record before end by civilengineer · · Score: 1

    If a missile can record where it hit and transmit video, that can be used for both getting info on the place hit and accuracy of the missile itself. Are there such systems already?

    --

    New year Resolution: Don't change sig this year
    1. Re:have this on missiles and record before end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're too young to remember the 1991 gulf war...

      I would guess since they showed the missile's target getting closer and closer until it just went black, that they indeed already have this technology implemented. This was on american television, but I thought it was shown worldwide.

  27. Re:Airborne pr0n? by !3ren · · Score: 1


    Nope, but you might see a bit of Bird pr0n...

  28. worlds smallest wireless camera by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Today at work (I work in a university's Instructional tech dept) I got to play with what is sold as "the worlds smallest wireless camera".

    And well, it was really small. About the size of my thumb plus a 9 volt battery. The stock range sucked though. I put on a 5ft Extension on the antenna (the antenna attached to the base via a coax adapter, so I just used a coax cable), and that about doubled the range.

    We were able to use it 1 floor up and about 100 feet away. This was around the tech dept though, so tons and tons of live electrical and data wiring.

    Anyways, what I am asking is, has anyone considered using something like this?
    I have a wireless card in my computer, and I start getting a bad connection about 150ft from the base station.

  29. Similar USA Site W/ Pics: Vidroc by cmholm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've flown an X10-based rocket using the description and photos at the Vidroc website. Hanging my ass on the line for no good reason, the maiden flight was during a school science fair. I got in a hurry and forgot to feed the video into a VCR, but the parents and kids watching the live feed of the rocket-eye view on a monitor in a nearby classroom said it looked great.

    The X10 hardware turns out to be pretty rugged, as I found out when the carrier rocket took a 200' death plunge into a nearby field. All of the wire leads broke, but they resolder easily, and the short bit of harder to fix coax was fine.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  30. Great Quality Footage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Want to see some nice rocket footage? Check out this video clip (http://www.vahpr.com/Ts/ts2_onboard1.mpg)complete with Mach speed ratings, from one of Experimental Rocketry's biggest groups in the hobby - MDRA (http://www.mdrocketry.org)

  31. Netspace is my isp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...and an article with video files too.
    NOOOOOOOOOO!
    *great*

    *goes outside for the first time in 3 years*

    1. Re:Netspace is my isp by LucidityZero · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the Slashdot effect is normally because customers run out of bandwidth, and their providers cut them off - not because the ISP's network or even server goes down - right? Is there anyone out here who really realizes this, or is it just me? :)

      --
      Sig.i>
    2. Re:Netspace is my isp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the only one. In fact even after reading your post and understanding it I will soon revert to to the nearly unshakeable belief that Slashdottings cause three alarm server fires.

  32. Re:Airborne pr0n? by localghost · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry to disappoint, but I don't believe they do that in flight.

    [Disclaimer: IANAO (I am not an ornithologist)]

  33. Wow, what's with the Microsoft agitators? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any idea why the Microsoft agitators are out in full force? Does this have to do with the fact that IIS lost so much marketshare to Apache?

    Whenever this happens, something bad is about to happen with Microsoft; usually a big PR hit.

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  34. That's just mean by Daikiki · · Score: 3, Funny

    2.4 Ghz transmitter and receiver: $100
    Bullet Camera: $75
    Hosting at netspace.net.au: $44.95 / month up to 100 MB
    Having your 15MB mpegs slashdotted: Priceless

    Literally.

    --
    I want the fire back.
    1. Re:That's just mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hosting at netspace.net.au: $44.95 / month up to 100 MB
      I hope you mean 100MB storage and then some reasonable transfer limit. But even that doesn't make much sense from reading the netspace homepage... This looks like a home-user type account from the URL, and the normal webspace limit is 10MB. It doesn't seem to include a limit on how much traffic the site gets, but maybe that is in the user agreement?...
  35. Yup, gotta agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stine was my hero when I was a kid. F engines?!?!? The pictures made my jaw drop -- those suckers made all the little Estes engines look like bottle rockets. [pout] I only got to play with C's or, if I was very lucky, D's.

    [reads above in somewhat more -ahem- mature light]

    Come to think of it, I came to prefer playing with C's and D's a few years later...

  36. A whole lot of fscking words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..for damned few "pretty pictures."

    This submission rated: dull, boring. -10

  37. Crashed?... What a lightweight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've totally LOST more rockets than you've CRASHED due to sheer overthrust.

    The last I've seen of many of them was the first second or two of launch at the launch pad.

  38. is that a model rocket cam in your pocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or are you just happIE to see US posting sumthings?

    if your batterIE dies, so do you?

    that old tune title (hope we don't get 'busted' for using it) "make the world go away", takes on new/varied meaning in these times.

    the prevalent notion that 'everything will be taken care of' without yOUR knowledge/participation is insidiously misleading.

    in our estimation, the biggest 'threat' against US (aside from continuing to fire bullinedly into the 'crowd', whilst demanding applause), would be a failure to recognize our 'role' in the problems. we're victims for sure, but whoare ALL the perpetrators (see also: corepirate nazi puppets), gets lost in the ?pr? ?firm? generated propaganda spew.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creator. seek others of non-aggressive behaviours/intentions. that's the spirit.

    the lights ARE coming up now. pay attention (to yOUR heart, for example). that could lead to new ways (see also: newclear power plan) of thinking about/dealing with, the needs/rights of others EVERYWHERE on the planet.

    having the attention span of a gnat, & similar ambitions, might be ok if you are just planning to be a consumer/type one liners.

    take care of each other, you're all we've got. we're here for you. get ready to see the light.--

    worth reading, again, with feeling.

    "It takes a long time to teach the judges, legislators, and public to understand technology. Right now, they're getting a strong dose of "education" on the Internet's threats and harms, and not hearing so much about its potential. Shouts of "piracy" often outweigh consideration of how we might communicate with more open media formats, but judges like Stephen Wilson in the Grokster case are starting to listen through the shouting. We're encouraging more people to think about how the law shapes technological innovation, how the technology itself can foster creativity, and then to do something about it to advance the public interest."--

    "The stability of the large world house which is ours will involve a revolution of values to accompany the scientific and freedom revolutions engulfing the earth. We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing"-oriented society to a "person"-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism and militarism are incapable of being conquered. A civilization can flounder as readily in the face of moral and spiritual bankruptcy as it can through financial bankruptcy."

  39. Re:Actually radio controlled rockets do exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a link
    http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001 p?&I=L XAWK2&P=D

    There are other more powerful ones too, but this is one you can order ready to go. Yes, it has wings and a tail but it is rocket powered.

  40. Wireless by Spooge+Knight · · Score: 1

    like the bullet I used to SHOOT TUPAC!

  41. The site handle being slashdotted by YoungBonzi · · Score: 1

    I can't watch the movies =

  42. Here is a mirror by attackiko · · Score: 1

    mirror of the second rocket

    here

  43. age ... by anonymous+leprechaun · · Score: 1

    That's really old FYI ... at least 2 years ... i COULD be wrong ... but using 2.4G to beam back video from rockets ... ive seen that atleast 2 years ago ... i remember one video where you could almost see the earths curve.

  44. Windows Media by Prax101 · · Score: 1

    "The Aussie RocketCam site has Windows Media..."

    The only thing worse then windows is window's media player... that thing keeps statistics and send's them straight to Bill's house, its none of his business that I have a fetish for movies starring midgets in drag with crotchless pants.