Slashdot Mirror


Windows 2000 Runs On Xbox Under Linux

MBCook writes "Everybody's favorite Xbox hackers have got Linux running for roughly six weeks, and now it runs well enough to announce that Windows has been run inside Linux with common PC virtualization software. They even have a little video of it playing a MPEG 4 of The Matrix fullscreen!"

254 comments

  1. oh the irony by cyborch · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...of taking an MS product and hacking at it 'till it runs linux, just to emulate another MS product.

    1. Re:oh the irony by bokketies · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if there's an X-box emulator available for Windows 2000. Now that would kick ass!

    2. Re:oh the irony by xingix · · Score: 0, Funny

      I think the world would rejoice if we could get a PS2 emulator running on Linux, running on the XBox. Oh the bliss! *swoon*

      --

      Confucious says: Man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

      // jeku.com

    3. Re:oh the irony by Troed · · Score: 1

      It's in the works. It will be done in roughly the same way as project Odin on OS/2.

    4. Re:oh the irony by Vader82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What would be really slick is to get VMware (I assume thats what they are using to run win2k) to boot the Xbox OS. If you had that capability, you could boot into linux and do work, then when you wanted to play a game you launch the Xbox OS and pop the game in. When you're done, go back to working by shutting down VMware. While this seems pointless (and perhaps it is) the nice thing about it is that you don't have to always be rebooting the machine. You probably get other cool features too. I don't have an xbox so I can't tell you, but I'm sure it would open up new opportunities to do more cool stuff just because you can.

    5. Re:oh the irony by tdelaney · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's called "proving that it works". If it can run Win2K from Linux on the hardware:

      1. It tells them that their port is sufficiently complete to do so;

      2. The hardware is capable of it, and so is capable of pretty much anything a normal PC can do.

      I would consider this a very valuable thing to do. Not to mention that it's a real kick in the nuts for MS :)

    6. Re:oh the irony by ClosedSource · · Score: 2

      "Not to mention that it's a real kick in the nuts for MS :)"

      Sounds like a larger market for MS. If people want to pay to run Windows 2000 on Linux, why should MS mind? You'd think Linux advocates would be taking the position that running Windows under Linux is unnecessary, rather than bragging that it can be done.

    7. Re:oh the irony by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Leave it to a bunch of Operating System junkies to get an OS running, only to use it to host another OS. It's like.... ummm.... that's not a true stress test of a machine, people.

      I mean, sure back in the day (about 1996, I think) I ran Wine and Executor (a Macintosh emulator) simultaneously on my Linux box so I could simultaneously run the Windows and the Macintosh 'Neko' software toy (that little kitten that followed the mouse pointer around the screen) to see if the Mac Neko would fight the Windows Neco. It wasn't a stress test of anything in particular (the hardware was, if I recall a 486/33 machine). It was just geekedness.

      To tell that their port is sufficient run something that puts a real load on the machine. Not just layers of OS.

    8. Re:oh the irony by ClosedSource · · Score: 2

      Oops. I missed the XBOX part. Go ahead and slam me. I'm going back to work now.

    9. Re:oh the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, VMWare emulates a 440bx chipset and a custom svga video card. The BIOS is a heavily hacked Phoenix.

      The XBox's OS expects to see a modified nforce chipset and microsoft's unbelievably proprietary BIOS.

    10. Re:oh the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, I think running an MPG4 video of the Matrix at full-screen qualifies as a decent stress test. I've got an older Powermac that sure as hell can't do that under OS 9.5. Also, emulating another OS is a very demanding task for every computer because in many cases it doubles the amount of code that must be executed to perform a task. Now, if it's a well done emulator, then all the emulated functions will have been mapped to corresponding hardware on the machine doing the emulating, thus giving you an emulation that is optimized to run on the specific hardware doing the emulation. Still, there must be an abstraction layer of some sort between the machine's native OS and the emulated OS in order to translate function calls, hardware addresses, etc....so even an optimized emulator requires significantly more computing resources than a native app. Therefore, running any computaionally-intensive app, such as an MPG4 decoder, under an emulated OS is probably one of the best stress tests. That, or running Quake3, but that's really a better 3d graphics benchmarking tool than an OS stress-test.

      Of course, I'm only a beginner when it comes to "real" programming (C++), so take that for what it's worth.

  2. Re:Can I? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you'll need a lot of Windows licences.....

  3. Microsoft's View by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder what Microsoft thinks about this. They oppose Linux on the Xbox, but would they oppose Win2K on top of Linux on the Xbox?

    And if not, would they oppose Linux on top of Win2K on top of Linux on the Xbox? Or even.......nevermind.

  4. But what would be more fun.. by MikeDX · · Score: 0

    Is XBOX running on windows 2000 :)

  5. Re:Can I? by roly · · Score: 0

    I can use the same licence in every one :P

    --
    "With Microsoft, you get Windows. With Linux, you get the full house" - unknown
  6. Win 2k by rastachops · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about running Windows 2000 on the XBox? Has it been done? Can it be done?

    1. Re:Win 2k by psavo · · Score: 2

      What about running Windows 2000 on the XBox? Has it been done? Can it be done?

      Nope. Unless you're working for MS, or love digging x86 assembly.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:Win 2k by cyborch · · Score: 1

      yes, it can be done: "now it runs well enough to announce that Windows has been run inside Linux with common PC virtualization software".

    3. Re:Win 2k by rastachops · · Score: 1

      ...without emulating it inside of linux.

    4. Re:Win 2k by ChadN · · Score: 1

      Well, it isn't emulating it. It is virtualizing the system, with hardware passthru for certain graphics features. Pretty impressive; would be ULTRA impressive if the Linux NVidia drivers also worked on XBox, and could be virtualized, so that Windows 2000 on Linux on XBox had accelerated 3D. Fat chance of that, though (unless NVidia cooperated...)

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    5. Re:Win 2k by Meowing · · Score: 1

      Of course it can be done. The native Xbox kernel is Windows 2000.

    6. Re:Win 2k by koh · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a stripped-down version that runs at ring 0 (in short, a small kernel-space "bundled" win2k).

      Maybe it can understand CreateWindowEx(), but it sure won't understand half the routines needed to run PC Windows apps.

      Maybe with a custom library CD...

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    7. Re:Win 2k by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Simple. Port Wine to Windows.

      Problem solved.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  7. cool but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    doesn't xbox have a dvd player built in? makes playing a movie [inside doze no less] kinda redundant dontcha think? [br][br] Now, if you could create a small little distro that would make xbox useful for someone who didn't wanna shell out a bunch of money for a desktop 'puter...

    1. Re:cool but... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

      What part of "MPEG 4" don't you understand? Yes, it has a DVD player, but DVD is "MPEG 2". They played a DivX, so yes, it is actually interesting.

    2. Re:cool but... by waferhead · · Score: 1

      Agreed, if someone wants just a computer, $199 at Wal-Mart gets you a decent machine with Lindows, or probably Mandrake preinstalled.

      That's cheaper than an X-Box as of today, no mods, and more games are available.

      (I'd go with the Mandrake one personally. It has a user base with a clue, and it tends to work quite well)

  8. Re:Can I? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but the real question is:

    Can you do all that while juggling three monkeys and a walrus?

    (One would never guess that it's nearly 7 am for me.)

  9. But... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny

    The obvious question is if they can get an Windows XBox Emulator working within Windows2000 on the Xbox.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:But... by SeanTobin · · Score: 1, Troll
      The obvious question is if they can get an Windows XBox Emulator working within Windows2000 on the Xbox.
      And the not-so-obvious question is will the games run faster because of the improved kernel/software ;)
      --
      Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nooooo!!! Infinite....loop....frying....brain....!

    3. Re:But... by falser · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better yet, could they:

      Play an XBox game...
      in an XBox emulator...
      running in Win2000...
      running within Linux.

    4. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He's dead, Jim."
      "Bones...can...you...fix...it...?"
      "Dammit Jim! I'm a doctor, not a computer scientist!"

    5. Re:But... by jkramar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, to complete the cycle, can they run Linux under an XBox emulator under Windows under Linux under an XBox emulator under Windows under Linux under an XBox emulator under Windows under Linux under an XBox emulator under Windows under Linux under an XBox emulator under Windows under Linux under an XBox emulator under Windows under Linux on an XBox?

      --

      true && more || less
    6. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any XBox emulators?

      That would be cool, but I was under the impression that it has not been done.

    7. Re:But... by bwt · · Score: 2

      Nobody is allowed to post any more about emulators running emulators until they can provide a rigorous upper bound on the maximum depth of the emulator within an emulator recursion, as a function of system resources.

    8. Re:But... by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      Nobody is allowed to post any more about emulators running emulators until they can provide a rigorous upper bound on the maximum depth of the emulator within an emulator recursion, as a function of system resources.

      Oh, I know this one: Run enough recursions and the resources will run out?

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    9. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would that be the win2000 kernel/software, dildo?

    10. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, this isn't AOL. Take your fucking retarded acronyms elsewhere.

  10. video issue by alpha1125 · · Score: 0

    I see a old computer monitor... with nothing playing on it.

    I think this is a joke, anyone want to confirm?

    --
    Money cannot buy happiness, but can buy something soo darn close, that you can't really tell the difference
    1. Re:video issue by perlyking · · Score: 2

      I dont, the video is fine for me, it shows an old monitor showing the matrix playing back, they then swivel the monitor and pointedly trace the scart cable to the XBOX (you can guess why!).

      I was hoping to see a vmware session of win2k, though perhaps it doesnt work and they are using BOCHS (because its open source...) which wouldnt make for a very dynamic video! :-)

      --
      no sig.
    2. Re:video issue by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 1

      It's playing, the video is just kinda dark/low quality.

      Keep watching and you'll eventually see someone moving the monitor around and such.

    3. Re:video issue by mackstann · · Score: 1

      turn up your brightness perhaps? its an old computer monitor....playing the matrix.

      heh, no joke

    4. Re:video issue by perlyking · · Score: 2

      duh I missed the link:

      http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/screenshots.ph p

      Theres more screenshots and another video on that page, still doesnt show win2k in action though as far as I can see.

      --
      no sig.
  11. Virtual, eh? by ciryon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uhm, did I miss something? Which virtualization software? VMWare? Wine?

    Ciryon

    1. Re:Virtual, eh? by Tarpan · · Score: 1

      Ohhh! not only are you trolling, you are trolling in swedish! *cheer*

    2. Re:Virtual, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verkar onekligen inte bättre!

    3. Re:Virtual, eh? by psavo · · Score: 4, Informative

      WINE is not a virtualization software. VMware is. WINE is a mere wrapper.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    4. Re:Virtual, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bork! Bork! Bork!

    5. Re:Virtual, eh? by CNeb96 · · Score: 1

      or Plex86? http://www.plex86.org/info.phtml

      "The goal of the Plex86 project is to create an extensible open source PC virtualization software program which will allow PC and workstation users to run multiple operating systems concurrently on the same machine."

    6. Re:Virtual, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was playing a DVD under win2k, it most certainly wasn't Plex86.

      Connectix Virtual PC only runs on windows, so that leaves VMWare. It does seem odd that they went out of their way to avoid mentioning that though.

  12. Although you're joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    No. You can't run another VMWare session inside of a VMWare session. x86 hardware just isn't suited to virtualisation, and one layer is all you'll get.

    Now, you could run Linux under Bochs under Windows 2000 under VMWare under Linux on the XBox....

    1. Re:Although you're joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Mac on Linux, with Virtual PC inside!

    2. Re:Although you're joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is wrong. There is no architectural reasons why VMware can't run inside VMware. You can nest as many layers as you want.

      The reasons they prevent you from doing it right now are:
      . It would be slow
      . It has no commercial interest

      VMware is written by a company, not open source developpers. The rules are quite different: their goal is to make money, not to show off with a high-geek-factor feature. They prefer to focus on features that customers _need_.

    3. Re:Although you're joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read this

      The x86 isn't virtualizable. When a trap occures, you can't know if it was caused by the first VM, or the second.

    4. Re:Although you're joking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trap argument is wrong: you always know which code (VM level 1 or VM level 2) the CPU was executing when the trap occured.

      So at any level, you know if the trap is an artifact of your virtualization or not, and you can handle it accordingly (i.e. absorb it or forward it).

  13. win2k games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i am curious, i know that xbox runs a stripped down win2k kernel, but is it possible to run win2k with full kernel (maybe even without hardware mods) and run window games? i mean, its the same hardware, and except for the video card driver, which might even be supplied by nvidias unified drivers :P, i think that it would be pretty cool to be able to play all my pc games on an xbox... thnx for any input..

    1. Re:win2k games? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      The XBox kernel is in a ROM somewhere, I would imagine this gets loaded to RAM and the box starts up. I'm sure the hardware can run a full blown Windows 2000, but since the code to Windows 2000 isn't available you won't see it happening. You would also need some drivers for the motherboard to get it running well.

    2. Re:win2k games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      motherboard = i810 ( so no problems here )

      the main prob is that it is missing a bios.

  14. for Pete's Sake! by Naikrovek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone PLEASE get these people a decent TV, man! and a better camera! ;)

    Those photos would have a lot more impact on me if i could see them better. hehe these guys are doing great things but someone please donate a TV or bigger monitor or whatever they're using.

    1. Re:for Pete's Sake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      everyone can see it fine. you're the one complaining, you buy them a tv you jackass.

    2. Re:for Pete's Sake! by rudiger · · Score: 1

      plus there is a certain air of elegance by running the xbox on a c64 monitor....

    3. Re:for Pete's Sake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no there isn't... dick...

    4. Re:for Pete's Sake! by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats a commodore 1084 - as I recall its a split video, composite, and rgb monitor with a .45 dot pitch - not bad for the day. I think its made by phillips.

      As far as a TV set goes you'll not find much better for the size. Later versions had stereo sound built in, Commodore's 1942, 1950, 1962 etc were better dot pitch wise and could do ntsc through vga (.28), but they didn't have the composite inputs.

    5. Re:for Pete's Sake! by voot · · Score: 1

      what thats one of the coolest tv's ever, its umm retro

  15. Just came across this page by perlyking · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.openoffice.org/screenshots/index.html
    screenshots of open office on XBOX.

    --
    no sig.
  16. This could be the future by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If virtualization software becomes cheap and effective, perhaps PC clones five years from now will always boot into Linux or another protected-mode OS and then start Windows on the virtual hardware. It would be a nice way to add more power to BIOS setup screens or to allow installing multiple OSes with no hassle. Perhaps also to let Windows 1984 run even on hardware that hasn't been certified as 'trusted'.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:This could be the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... Windows has used protected mode since Win 3.11 to varying degrees, and the whole of the NT series is fully coded to make use of protected mode.

    2. Re:This could be the future by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I meant that hardware would boot a protected-mode OS and run Windows under virtualization, as opposed to the current setup when the bootloader uses ye olde real mode and then Windows takes over the whole machine. The point is that there would be a layer between Windows and the hardware.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:This could be the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but doesn't this sort of provide the basic way to do the Trusted OS/Palladium platform from Microsoft?

      What if the boot OS was not Debian, then what?

  17. wow.. running for 6 weeks! by hugesmile · · Score: 5, Funny
    Six weeks without crashing! That might be a new record!


    I remember when NT first came out, and Microsoft was pushing it as an Enterprise Server. One of their top engineers was involved in the press announcement, and made the comment with pride that some of the systems in the lab have been running for six weeks without crashing.


    The analysts and large customers ROASTED him: "We've had AS400's and HP 3000's and 9000's and Dec Vax's that haven't crashed EVER for YEARS."


    Somehow, Gates wiggled his way into the data center. Those Vax's and 3000's are probably still running without crashing, ten years later, if they're still there....

    ...And Microsoft learned to never reward a top engineer by letting him speak at a press announcement.

    1. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by r3nt0n · · Score: 0, Troll

      Easy to say they had been running for years, when their software/hardware HAD been out for years. If it was a press release for Windows NT, it wouldn't have been out for years, let alone months in a final release state.

    2. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by PerryMason · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but not so easy to say after its been out for 6 years and still struggles to stay up that long. Meanwhile the AS400s are still churning away, up as long as the UPS will keep em that way....

      Hell, the MCSE credo is "If the server's playing up, reboot it".

      --
      "I'm tired of all this 'Aren't humanity great' bullshit. We're a virus with shoes" - Bill Hicks
    3. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by r3nt0n · · Score: 1

      Very true

      Maybe they were trying to say it was better then Windows 95's problem of rebooting every 30 or so days automaticly? If I recall correctly, it was a bug ni Windows 95

    4. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      ebooting every 30 or so days automaticly

      IIRC, and I don't have any links handy, it was something like 49 days and it's not that it would reboot. It would just simply stop, as in: -------|
      WALL.
      But that wasn't found out till well after '98 had been out, I think.

      Again, I don't have any links handy, but I can remember listening to the local news radio one saturday morning on my way to get some coffee and they were talking about this.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    5. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've had a Sql Cluster running on the same node (no failover) for a year now. No problems. Nada. They are finally getting it right.

    6. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      No those vax's and as/400's have been replaced with solaris boxen. :-)

      However most non mission critical servers do use NT or w2k. IT seems Microsoft ate up the low end server market yet can't reach beyond that. One of the fallacies about the marketshare is that it takes lots of w2k boxen to do the work of one solaris or as/400 box. Not to mention you need clustering due to instability. With these things added up your looking at 4 w2k boxen that 1 solaris box could do. To someone looking at marketshare, it would seem Microsoft would be winning based on the amount of sales. Like it or not w2k marketshare is growing at a fast pace and I think its now %50 of the market! But like I said it takes several w2k boxes to do the work of one big sun server.

      Ignore all the data. Infact alot of bussiness like motorolla and Texas Intrustments actually switched back to unix from NT. Stability and scalability were not as high as expected.

    7. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by askii64 · · Score: 0

      There's a patch for windows 95 out that fixes that bug, and I believe it is 49 days like you said. Only problem with installing patches on 95 is if you install too many of them the whole system gets messed up. :(

      --

      -This quite possibly mangled, stupid, demented comment was brought to you by Askii64.
    8. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An SQL cluster on '95?

      You're digging your own grave.

      Oh, wait, you didn't actualy READ the comment and just realized you didn't mena Win '95...

    9. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The analysts and large customers ROASTED him: "We've had AS400's and HP 3000's and 9000's and Dec Vax's that haven't crashed EVER for YEARS."
      I'm pissed. One of my microvaxes crashed last weekend. It had only been up for 460 days, the bugger. And the cluster partner didn't handle the outage cleanly, so I had to reboot both of them. Crap, I guess I'll have to get into an annual reboot cycle on them after all. WinNT boxes get rebooted once a month. Win2K once every 2 months. Vaxes have not had a schedule until now. What the &*)(&^ is VMS coming to, anyway.
    10. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by zeno_2 · · Score: 2
      IIRC, and I don't have any links handy, it was something like 49 days and it's not that it would reboot.

      I think you might be talking about this:

      Q216641

    11. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean MicroVAXen I'm sure...

    12. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The engineer said that SOME of the boxes had gone 6 weeks without crashing. Those that weren't part of that some had crashed, then.

      A pathetic showing for an enterprise-class OS.

    13. Re:wow.. running for 6 weeks! by jrumney · · Score: 1

      In fact, sometimes Windows NT even ran for 49.7 days!!!

  18. Why is it so fascinating? by mocm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anytime someone gets another program running under
    xbox linux you get a new article on /..
    What is so surprising? Once you got the kernel with drivers for framebuffer, sound and usb running you could run almost any program that runs under ix86 linux.
    The next big news would be that 3d acceleration is running, so that you can run all those 3d games with reasonable speed.
    Anybody try the Xbox as a UT server yet? NWN server anyone?
    Ok, it's not easy to get Win2000 running with just 64MB.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:Why is it so fascinating? by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anytime someone gets another program running under
      xbox linux you get a new article on /..
      What is so surprising?


      Probably because it's one of the fundamental drivers of OSS development - the "hey wouldn't it be cool if..." attitude. Linus originally thought it would be cool to have a Unix like OS on 386s. Scratching an itch may have its limitations when it comes to things that OSS is bad at - like user-friendliness - but it's still the driving force behind this kind of porting effort.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    2. Re:Why is it so fascinating? by uchian · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of people in OSS who are scratching the user-friendlyness itch at the moment.

      Mainly on the big desktop environments, but hey, that's where user friendlyness matters the most at the moment!

    3. Re:Why is it so fascinating? by faraway · · Score: 1

      Ok, it's not easy to get Win2000 running with just 64MB.

      That's an interesting comment. I have an old notebook P233/32MB, and I found Win2000 not only is faster but also deals better with whats available hardware wise compared to Win98. I never had problems with it at 32MB, and I ran Office, etc on it.

      Marius

    4. Re:Why is it so fascinating? by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same here. Mine's a P166/64MB though, and it is faster on 2k than on 98. It swaps more than a bit, but it's tolerable enough once the programs are actually running...

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
  19. Slashdot getting left behind... by houston_pt · · Score: 0

    This must be one of the few times this happens, but the Portuguese counterpart of /. , Gildot has beaten his big brother to the story! You can read it here!

    --
    coffee | nose > keyboard ©
    1. Re:Slashdot getting left behind... by koh · · Score: 1

      Great ! you beat /. on that one ! More power to you ! ;))

      But even through babelfish the comments are barely understandable... and I can't speak portugese, sorry ;p

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
  20. Re:Emumadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And far off in the distance, you hear the distinct pop of someone's head exploding...

  21. Loss leader... uhm, allgone. by jonadab · · Score: 2

    For those who have been saying that the xbox-linux project is
    bad for MS because it costs them the loss leader, err, I think
    running W2K on it covers that loss leader fairly effectively.
    Not that it isn't intersting and all, but the price of W2K will
    chew up your savings pretty fast. At this point one of those
    Microtel PCs (without W2K) might actually be cheaper.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  22. Maybe.... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    ... its a really funky case mod?

    Just kidding. They at least have style/some sort of presentation skills.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  23. Okay.. so how many... by netsharc · · Score: 5, Funny
    counts of violation of the DMCA is that?
    • One for cracking the Xbox.
    • Two for pirating Windows.
    • Three for having a bootleg copy of the Matrix.
    I guess if you wanna piss 'em off, better do it all at once. :) Anybody have an MP3 of N-"Stupid f'ing-Capitalist-no-space-trip-for-you!"-Sync for them to play?
    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Okay.. so how many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did it say they had pirated Windows? They may very well have bought the copy used.

    2. Re:Okay.. so how many... by _ganja_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe there are no counts of the DMCA being breached here?

      Xbox is reversed engineered for operability; running GNU/Linux which the DMCA allows.

      You assume their copy of Win2k is a pirate version.

      How do you know this is a bootleg of the Matrix? They could very well own the original disk / this could well be the trailer.

      --

      A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

    3. Re:Okay.. so how many... by psamuels · · Score: 1
      Maybe there are no counts of the DMCA being breached here?

      Hey, get a sense of humor already. (:

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    4. Re:Okay.. so how many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, they could have bought it used, but that violates the license agreement on the OS, the lisence is non-transferable. If they bought it used then it is an illegitimate copy!

    5. Re:Okay.. so how many... by jjsoh · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. Is the license completely non-transferable?

      What if you buy a copy of Windows but don't want, need, or use it anymore? Can't you just give it to someone instead of selling it? Would that be legal?

      I don't understand why such a harsh restriction could be placed on any software.

    6. Re:Okay.. so how many... by bwt · · Score: 2

      You left out #4: posting the video of it all for the whole world to see. :-]

      There was a recent case in Australia that REJECTED a similar claim by Sony under their DMCA equivalent (which is very equivalent).

      The court ruled that mod chips do not circuvent anything that controls a right of the copyright holder. If this ruling stands (Sony is appealing), it marks the first limiting decision anywhere on what is sure to be an ongoing battle: the dividing line between access control and use control.

    7. Re:Okay.. so how many... by Osty · · Score: 1

      Anybody have an MP3 of N-"Stupid f'ing-Capitalist-no-space-trip-for-you!"-Sync for them to play?

      You say "Capitalist" like it's a bad thing. What's wrong with you?

    8. Re:Okay.. so how many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nothing's wrong with him.

      Capitalism just doesn't apply to certain markets where there is no scarcity. When it's force fitted people cry fowl

    9. Re:Okay.. so how many... by dytin · · Score: 2

      Nothing's wrong with him.

      Capitalism just doesn't apply to certain markets where there is no scarcity. When it's force fitted people cry fowl


      There is always scarcity. Yes, music can be copied infinitely for cheap, but where do you think it came form in the first place? It came from a scarce resource. (Don't misinterperet this to me liking N'Sync, I don't like their music, but I also don't see a problem with them making money because other people like it). Do you honestly think that capitalism has been force fitted into the market? Granted, the DMCA etc. are force, but the DMCA is not capitalism. Capitalism is the only natural market, any other market is just a bastardization. Any other market requires that force be used to maintain the equilibrium, and the threat of force will always eventually fail if given enough time.

    10. Re:Okay.. so how many... by netsharc · · Score: 2

      Probably jealousy, that a 22 year old like him makes more money than I a 21 year old like I am, although he (so I'd like to believe) has no talents at all.

      But you really should have read the moron Hollywood Producer's comment about the Russian official that's been causing this "difficulty". He whines about the fact how he already had a TV program deal to will follow Bass during his space training (titled "When Morons Go To Space Camp"?) and how they're going to do a big concert when he returns, and that the Russian official was rude and had a big mouth.

      Anyway, read the article yourself. Sure I'm taking the Russians side, but if they were characters in a film in which they're stranded in, say, a space station, I bet that Hollywoodian would be the first to be out of the airlock.

      OT: I followed the link to your site. Nice Porsche, you make me jealous. :)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    11. Re:Okay.. so how many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they pirated VMWare too.. =)

  24. I'm disappointed... by gnovos · · Score: 1

    I was hoping they would be creative enough to go one step further and install Cygwin!

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:I'm disappointed... by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      No, VMWare under Win2k and then they can run Linux in a window in Win2k in Wine on Linux on a crippled Win2k kernel on an X-Box on a stick!

      Ohh, I'm getting dizzy...

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:I'm disappointed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, especially that you now get bochs under cygwin. Well, of course bochs also needs the XFree86 under directX, but that comes with cygwin too, these days. And then I suppose you could run BeOS under bochs, and startup macExecutor there. I wonder if there is a decent C64 emulator for macs, though...

  25. Slashdot needs another topic category by irishkev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN"

    1. Re:Slashdot needs another topic category by PerryMason · · Score: 1

      Maybe with an alternative title "How I breached the DMCA".

      --
      "I'm tired of all this 'Aren't humanity great' bullshit. We're a virus with shoes" - Bill Hicks
    2. Re:Slashdot needs another topic category by swillden · · Score: 2

      That would be redundant. I mean, it already says "SNews for Nerds." on the top of every page.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  26. The story so far... by xxSOUL_EATERxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now I can download and watch a video... of an MPEG... being played on an OS... which is being EMULATED under another OS.... which is being run on hardware designed for an entirely different OS.

    It is fitting that the video in question is from The Matrix. I just want to know what combination of blue and red pills to you take understand the whole setup.

    1. Re:The story so far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone mentioned earlier, it's not emulation, it's virtualization. There's a difference.

    2. Re:The story so far... by tweakt · · Score: 2
      So now I can download and watch a video... of an MPEG... being played on an OS... which is being EMULATED under another OS.... which is being run on hardware designed for an entirely different OS.

      Um, actually no. The XBOX normally runs the Windows 2000 kernel.

    3. Re:The story so far... by magic · · Score: 2
      It's even better than that. The entire setup you're watching in the video is a really complicated way of playing a movie on a television, which presumably we could do without the Xbox in the first place.


      -m

    4. Re:The story so far... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Silly Soul_Eater, those pills are *purple* !! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:The story so far... by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      I would not call the Windows 2000 kernel an OS.

  27. A cheap Win2k box? by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great, now you can take a 200 dollar, 800 MHZ machine with a 10 GB Hard Drive, a DVD drive, and no floppy, and (after spending days configuring and futzing) get it to run the same software as a 200 dollar, 800 mhz machine with a 10 GB Hard Drive, a CD drive, and no floppy from wallmart.com.

    I'm sorry, I don't mean to be down on the project. But having the nasty green box as a cheap computer just isn't as compelling a reason as it used to be, and Microsoft is getting closer and closer to making a profit off of each one sold. Now, if we could find some way to run unsigned games on the raw system, thus creating a tremendous distribution platform, that would be compelling. If we could find some easy way to translate computer games, that would be compelling. If we could DDoS microsoft.com...

    I love the sense of irony these system hackers have and can't wait for the next exciting episode. But somehow anything that might make a Microsoft product more popular in a non-entrenched market just doesn't sit right with me.

    --
    This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
    1. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Great, now you can take a 200 dollar, 800 MHZ machine with a 10 GB Hard Drive, a DVD drive, and no floppy, and (after spending days configuring and futzing) get it to run the same software as a 200 dollar, 800 mhz machine with a 10 GB Hard Drive, a CD drive, and no floppy from wallmart.com.

      Yes, but now you only have to buy one $200 POS instead of 2.

      I forgot my password and I'm not browsing from my workstation... I'm really not an AC :P

    2. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not for practical use. The point is that the thing can run Linux pretty solidly -- enough to pull something like this off.

      Plus, it's a "technically cool" project, not one intended to replace your desktop machine.

    3. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by damiam · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind that the xbox has a GeForce4, and the Walmart machine has some kind of minor integrated graphics chip with 8mb of shared memory.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by unoengborg · · Score: 1

      From the Linux point of view it would be better to create good games for the standard Linux platform. That way both the Xboxes and the signed MS software can remain on the shelf.

      --
      God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
    5. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that the Walmart box has more RAM and is probably much more suited than XBox with it's 64MB shared between CPU and GPU

    6. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2

      Or put VmWare directly into the kernel. Run your windows desktop and Xwindows desktop together. Flip desktops with a keypress! Run software for anything!

      Brain Overloaded: Core dump

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    7. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as a 200 dollar bill.

    8. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought it was a GeForce 2. I mean, if it was a GeForce 4, then the XBox would've cost at least twice what it did on launch...

    9. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by zulux · · Score: 2

      I'm with you 100%

      Even if someone can get MAME running on a Xbox without a mod-chip, I still won't buy one at retail. That retail sale would give Microsoft more clout with game developers but letting them pimp out even more Xbox "consumers."

      And besides the Xbox is UGLY. People might mistake one of the hidious controllers for a sex toy and give me a funny look.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    10. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by damiam · · Score: 1

      It's a custom-made card somewhere between a GeForce 3 and 4. Since video cards themselves don't cost much to produce, most of their price is to recoup R&D costs. Since nVidia had already done the R&D on the GeForce 4 and was selling retail cards to pay for it, they could probably afford to cut a cheap deal with MS.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    11. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Crap, no wonder that kid was so happy about buying my bike for $200.

      --
      What?
    12. Re:A cheap Win2k box? by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      I'm buying a patched X-Box on Monday. Why?
      Because I want a practical media and storage server which can be online 24/7 and doesn't sound like a frigging airplane.
      I'm having my computers in my bedroom and as such can't have them on during nights (as they emit too much sound, kind of like trying to sleep on a runway). The X-Box is a fairly quiet machine, which for the first time enables me to have a server online at all times. It's also a great alternative for viewing series or movies I get from friends (not yet available in my region).

      I'm not trying to deny the fact that I download series and stuff. I justify that to myself morally by the fact that there is no other way for me to get certain stuff. If I want something and it has been released on DVD, I purchase it (like the TV series 24, available via import from the US), but some stuff simply aren't available by other means than via the Net.
      I also download stuff like movies showing at theaters (in the US). Not denying that either. However, if I like the movie, I'm buying it later on when it's available in my country on DVD as well, as the image and sound quality is so much better than the VCD rips. Downloading stuff, for me, isn't about being cheep. I've got enough money to buy the CDs, DVDs etc. that I want. The problem though is the f*cking idiocy of restricting access of or varying release dates of stuff in different geographic regions.

      The XBox (refitted with a 120 GB HD) will also be a great platform for storing and playing the DivX converted holiday videos, I've captured with my digi-cam.

      All and all, I've been waiting for the Linux port to be available for quite some time!

      (Now I'm just waiting for the next version of the X-Box, which if rumors are true, will have a video capture feature. Then my vision of the optimal media station can become true)

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
  28. Wow, what sci-en-tists. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 0, Troll

    They got a PC-based platform to run a PC based operating system inside another PC based operating system.

    I do that now with my Athlon 2000 MP.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Wow, what sci-en-tists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you reverse engineer your BIOS in order to circumvent the requirement to sign the CD which you used to boot your installation CD? How much time did you spend on decoding the locking mechanism and documenting the partition scheme, and the filesystem, used on your harddrive? Did you write your own drivers for the new and undocumented hardware in your Athlon 2000 MP?

      No of course you didn't. So keep your trap shut.

    2. Re:Wow, what sci-en-tists. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1, Flamebait



      No, actually, you fucking retard, I did none of that, because I bought my computer to use as a computer and my XBox to use as a video game console like most normal fuckers out there.

      What a total fucking waste of time the XBox hacking project is.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  29. Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows XP by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1

    since reinstalling on an Xbox just might constitute a "hardware change" sufficient to trigger Product Activation...

    But, that is a good reminder of the reduction in casual copying that WPA undoubtedly has brought about (for better or worse).

    --
    four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
  30. Great way to stick it to M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only do they lose $150 on the Xbox itself, they lose another $200 on the pirated copy of Win2K. Sweeeeet...

  31. Why is Tux crying??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In this screenshot:

    Tux crying

    is it because he is sitting on top of a Microsoft product???

    He looks fine in this picture.

    1. Re:Why is Tux crying??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because he has no one to play Tux Racer with him. :(

  32. Now you've done it... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    Slashdotted Gildot.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  33. Should be put in the "I goddageddelife" dept. by croftj · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Don't these people have anything better to do with their time and energy. It's almost as wastefull as spending your days on Slashdot!

    --
    -- Many men would appreciate a woman's mind more if they could fondle it
  34. "common PC virtualization software"? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2
    What virtualization software is that? The only stuff I'm aware of that could run something like Win2K, is VMWare. Is it VMWare? If so, why don't they say VMWare?

    Just curious.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:"common PC virtualization software"? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      as far as i can tell vmware would be the logical choice since i don't believe bochs would be up to it..(to play mpeg4 fast enough).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:"common PC virtualization software"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bochs isn't virtualization software, and I don't think that it's suitable for playing mpeg4 (well, not on x86, maybe it works better with more registers). Plex86 is probably what you're after, although I'm not sure how stable it is; it's probably best to wait.

  35. Microsoft tactics explained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Spread the (false) news that the XBox is unhackable. This is a psychological move aimed to attracting hackers and geeks, in other words have more people writing software for the XBox, i.e. more potential employed coders in the future.

    2. Spread the (false) news that the XBox is underpriced, and every time one is sold Microsoft loses money. This is plainly false (and in many countries would be illegal). The purpose is of course selling XBoxe[s|n] to Microsoft haters too.

    3. Make easily crackable changes to the XBox firmware to hide your real purposes (see point 1).

    4. Profit!

    1. Re:Microsoft tactics explained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have a beowolf cluster of THOSE.
      how do you like them apples?

  36. Re:Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows by slide-rule · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think a phone call into product activation would've been a hoot.

    Product Activation: "Hello, Product Activation center. What can I do to help you today?"
    Crafty Hacker: "Uh, yeah. I need to re-activate my XP installation. I changed a couple things and it apparently tripped something."
    PA: "Okay, sure. First, what's the CD Key on your XP installation disk?"
    CH: "Err, its [rattles off numbers/letters]."
    PA: "Right. Okay. What type of system do you have it running on now,then? I need your make/model, processor speed, [etc.]"
    CH: "Well, I guess the system is a Microsoft XBOX. [starts ratting off rest of system specs] --"
    PA: "A What? It doesn't run on that. Are you sure you don't mean--"
    CH: "No, really... the verification hash of the system is [rattles off numbers/letters]"
    PA: "That seems like a valid hash, but..." (Increasingly nervous product activation employee has a panic attack as a manager tries to make sense of the ensuing chaos.)

  37. Well by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Which virtualisation software was that?

    The 'common' virtualization software is Vmware, or Wine. VMware, I doubt works without the proper architecture behind it.. sot hat leaves wine..
    but you don't run windows in wine.. so...

    What is it?

  38. Re:Emumadness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eYes, because you have virtual pc on the mac os running a ps2 emulator as the emulated os? I didn't know that was possible, I expected it to run windows, which would run the ps2 emulator!

  39. its not emulating by fluor2 · · Score: 1

    its not emulating another product. its just emulating a virtual computer. in other words, the product itself (win2000) is not emulated.

  40. VMWare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    What do you think you mean with "VMware, I doubt works without the proper architecture behind it." What do you think an XBox is? Do you understand what an Operating System is, and how device drivers work? Once they had Linux and XFree86 running, they can run any x86 Linux software they like. Including VMWare.

    1. Re:VMWare by psavo · · Score: 2

      I sure hope they can pull the same trick when Apple makes switch to x86 based boxen. At that time (03Q4-04Q3) any x86-proc will emulate hardware faster than it runs live on G4.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:VMWare by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I do understand how they work.

      I suppose I assumed the XBOX had more different hardware in it than it really does.

  41. MOL on x86? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That I'd like to see. MOL will only run on Mac PPC hardware, and basically virtualises a PPC machine and boots the Mac ROM inside of it.

    If you can do that on an XBox, I'd be very impressed.

  42. Re: I am wondering why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they care so much about Linux to work under Xbox?

  43. Why Restrict the X-Box by Aknaton · · Score: 1

    Why does MS even bother to restrict what the X-Box can run? From what I have seen, they would be able to sell more consoles if it was open to whatever people wanted it to run.

    1. Re:Why Restrict the X-Box by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      They don't want to sell more consoles - the consoles cost them money. They want to sell more games.

      If people are running openoffice under linux on thier xboxes, MS has lost money.

    2. Re:Why Restrict the X-Box by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Because they lose money on the hardware and then make it up on the games. They have to sell something like 5 or 6 games per console to break even.

      Some people have also suggested that Xbox is a test run for Palladium on the PC.

    3. Re:Why Restrict the X-Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=40932&threshol d=-1&commentsort=0&tid=106&mode=nested&cid=4349649

  44. Using virtualization to secure your data... by weave · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Damn, your post reminded me of another use, securing YOUR Windows YOUR way. I saw it demoed at H2K2 last july. I just can't remember the website addy. It boots debian, then runs vmware automatically and prompts for a secure password. It then loads Windows using a virtual drive. The drive is encrpyted. A USB dongle is also required. Remove the usb dongle, the puppy shuts down automatically. Debian runs without swap to hopefully eliminate any chance of the vmware session being swapped to unencrypted disk.

    The guy demoing it is mainly meant to protect laptop data from common thieves, is targeted towards road warriors, and is not meant to keep the government out because if they arrest you and the laptop, they can coerce you into giving them access.

    Ah yes, google rules. Here's a link to a story about it. Company name is NAH6.

    1. Re:Using virtualization to secure your data... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      That's cool.

      I was thinking to myself a while back that it would be nice to see VMWare as an OS... and that the closest thing to that would be a linux kernel engineered to work tightly with vmware.

      It would be nice to see vmware with proper vesa 2.0 support, along with accelerated video and more hardware support.

      If I could run it on my laptop the way things are described, and only take a small speed hit, I would do it. it's the functionality hit that I don't want to take.

    2. Re:Using virtualization to secure your data... by really? · · Score: 1

      you need to look at VMWare's other products ... "somewhat" expensive though.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    3. Re:Using virtualization to secure your data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think, at the big retailer where I work, there is some IBM hardware runinning VMware copies of Windows.

    4. Re:Using virtualization to secure your data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was thinking to myself a while back that it would be nice to see VMWare as an OS... and that the closest thing to that would be a linux kernel engineered to work tightly with vmware."

      Call your VMWare sales rep. Its called ESX server, and has been on the market for a year or two.

      "It would be nice to see vmware with proper vesa 2.0 support, along with accelerated video and more hardware support."

      VESA 2.0 is coming soon, and its has had accelerated video (using a custom driver) for years...

  45. X86 emulators by fred666 · · Score: 1

    Many people here talked about Wine and VMWare, but many forgot to talk about bochs: a free [freespeech] PC emulator.
    More infos: http://bochs.sourceforge.net

    1. Re:X86 emulators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because Bochs sucks? I tried it years ago and it still sucked. VMWare came along and in 1 year completely showed that it was possible to do a virtualized PC nicely. I'd much rather use VMWare than wait around for 15 years for bochs to be able to run a stable Win2k build.

    2. Re:X86 emulators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VMWare virtualizes the PC.

      Bochs emulates the PC.

      Get it?

  46. What's next? by Betelgeuse · · Score: 2

    Now they just need to get CygWin running under Windows. THEN, they could run an Xbox emulator. . .

    --
    I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
  47. Ugh by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    GNU/Linux on an XBox - what a waste of time!

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  48. Two operating systems? Bah. by mmoncur · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when this guy has 30 operating systems running on an XBox.

    --

    It's Slashdot's evil twin... SlashNOT
  49. Re: I am wondering why! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2

    They are protecting their investment. Microsoft loses on the sale of an Xbox (if you listen to industry practices) and make their money up on the games. Now imagine if the hardware can be hacked in such a way that you can bypass the security measures on it, and run whatever you want, including copied versions of their games. Big money losses!
    Now imagine that this is going on right now... Oh wait, it is.

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  50. Re:Loss leader... uhm, allgone. by roushi · · Score: 1

    You honestly think that they paid for that copy of Win2k that they used? They can't afford a decent monitor, a decent pc, or a real tv. What makes you think they can afford Win2k?

  51. Thought the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But nobody seems to get it... XBox on W2k on Linux on XBox...

    Hmmm... if W2k runs on Linux can we say Linux is ready for the desktop yet?

  52. Or Plex86 by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    but many forgot to talk about bochs: a free [freespeech] PC emulator.

    Bochs emulates a PC, including the CPU. Thus, things become slow, and you may not have enough power to view an MPEG movie, but you can run x86 apps on other CPU architectures. In addition, bochs is slow enough that it runs old DOS games at the "right" speed.

    Plex86, on the other hand, runs on x86 processors and "virtualizes" the environment. It emulates only the motherboard, a couple common adapter cards, and some aspects of the inner-ring modes of the CPU. It runs x86 user code natively on the processor, preserving most of the speed.

    But if they can build a $200 Lindows PC, why not make a $200 "additional PC" PCI card? It would let Anonymous Coward actually build a Beowulf cluster in his PC's case.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Or Plex86 by zulux · · Score: 2

      But if they can build a $200 Lindows PC, why not make a $200 "additional PC" PCI card?

      Sun makes one. It's $200 with $299 added for evem more Sun Large Profit(tm). More info

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Or Plex86 by iankerickson · · Score: 2

      Sun sells one. I think the name is "Sun PCi". It's a PC on a PCI card. $500 last time I checked, and no open drivers (Solaris on SPARC only), but that could change. Orange Micro used to sell PCs on PCI cards for Macs.

      --
      Democracy. Whiskey. Sexy. Pick any two.
  53. Re:Loss leader... uhm, allgone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody buys Win2k silly. That's why it's the last great Microsoft OS. XP on the other hand is a pile of shit since it's harder to pirate and you need to pay for it. Fuck that.

  54. Wow... by diwolf · · Score: 1

    And pretty soon, it'll be able to run XBox GAMES TOO!! What progress!

  55. big deal by ikea5 · · Score: 1

    call me when they sucessfully boot 38 OSs on XBOX.

  56. clap-clap-clap-whistle. by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    Hat's off to these guys for doing that! Gives me encouragement that somewhere, somehow, someone is able to get their machines to "jump through hoops" with all that "running windows on top of linux on a game console" stuff. Hooray for them! Now, if I could just get the $%@&* CDROM drive to boot in something other than Windows 98 on this Compaq Deskpro 575 that I have worn the hell out. Imagine my shock and suprise when even tomsrtbt 1.7.361 can't spot this drive when Windows 98 can and does! I'm ready to throw this peezoshit in the Dumpster!

  57. Hrmm.. by fadeaway · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if you can still play X-Box games on a box that's been that heavily modified? That alone would almost make me want to add an X-Box to my console shelf. At $299 CAD, that's a CHEAP ass rig for running windows games.

    I imagine that Direct X would have some issues with it, and that finding a driver for the X-Box video processor would be a bitch though.. =P

  58. Fucking loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back and continue sucking Gates' cock, plz.

  59. Crashes to crashes, DOS to DOS by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Or like a multiboot setup I once did (for reasons that escape even myself): boot to DRDOS, use its boot manager to select Win2K, use its boot manager to select Win95, which in turn was set up to start in plain M$DOS. Talk about the long way around! :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Crashes to crashes, DOS to DOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont sound very smart.

  60. Windows On Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If windows runs as xbox think of the possibilities for MS. It could be a gaiming center, media center, and computer. Also it would be cheap MS could sell it for $500 and Include a 32 Inch TV instead of a monitor.

    Image what linux would look like on a 53 inch projection TV !!!!! Maybe this is MS's plan to use to take control of x86 manufacturing and smash Aol out of Media. But will they use it.

    Xbox could be what makes up the hardware of Pallidan!!!

    Human on Earth

  61. hey i know!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets install linux so we can run windows! but if we run windows nativly, it really sucks.

    lame.

  62. heh... by mraymer · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, is it Xbox Linux or Xbox GNU/Linux? Heh, I feel like a troll for asking that. Better mod me down into oblivion.

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  63. I didn't believe it... by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    ..until I saw the cables connecting it all up to the XBox. I can practically HEAR the tortured scream of the XBox forced to boot it's mortal enemy "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!". Take that ya bastard. #:^)

  64. If anyone wants to know the reason BSD is dying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    projects like this are it.

  65. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean to tell me that some guys actually ran Linux softare WHILE RUNNING LINUX? That's just fucking incredible.

  66. Wow, this thing must be fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running Windows 2000 on top of Linux on top of a Windows 2000 deviriation..... that must be *fast*. Why not throw in a PPC emulation so you could run Mac OS X (via MOL) on top of LinuxPPC on top of Windows 2000 on top of Linux on top of some closed version of Windows 2000. Now then we can get some *real* cheap and fast Macs :-)

  67. Not to be obvious, but... by Kingstrum · · Score: 1

    "My God...it's full of penguins!"

    or

    "What's the GREEN pill do?"

  68. Re:Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the dumbest thing I have ever read.

  69. Media Player only plays the visualization/audio by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    How do I get the video?

    Is there better software for windows that can play AVIs?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Media Player only plays the visualization/audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      download the right codec numbnuts, it's probably DivX ;-) go here: www.divx.com

  70. How does the performance compare to a PC? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    So if you line the Xbox up against an equivalent PC, which one is faster running programs?

    If the Xbox is quicker, is it due to it's memory architechture? (sp?)

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:How does the performance compare to a PC? by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      Well, with 64mb o' ram... my guess is that it would suck ass.

  71. Do you believe it? by crivens · · Score: 1

    Can we believe these pictures?

    1. Re:Do you believe it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is unbelievable - the video is unreliable and blatantly untrue. I wonder why you would bother to do this but pretty lame. Any person with eyes can tell that this has been creatively edited.

  72. Re:Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows by swillden · · Score: 1

    That is the dumbest thing I have ever read.

    Well, yes, of course. That's because it went over your head. Go buy a case of Laffy Taffy candy, it has jokes at your level. Enjoy!

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  73. Licenses? by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    I want to see their legitimate licenses of win2k and the pc emulation software :D

    1. Re:Licenses? by alecto · · Score: 1

      VMware offers 30 day eval licenses for free. And they could be using an eval Win2K :).

  74. Stupid waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with these posts? Who cares. Getting linux or anything else to run on the XBOX is a waste of time, resources, and it utterly useless. Perhaps these people should spendd their time doing something a bit more productive. If you're going to do something, do something worth doing.

  75. Apple to X86??? by cjerens · · Score: 1

    Why are you so sure that Apple is going to switch over to X86? I actually think that's quite unlikely, although Apple is keeping their options opened by keeping a current X86 Jaguar port. Unless something consederably bad happened to the PowerPC architecture, I can't see why they would ever change over to x86's. A PowerPC from either IBM or Motorola is their future.

  76. The Matrix, eh? In MPEG4, you say? by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

    Hmm... It's... Sig2Dat time! File:The Matrix [DivX].avi Length:606580736 Bytes,592364KB UUHash:=NU+6vO//nt1xRJWKvtxhMM2gmLA= Wanna bet?

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
    1. Re:The Matrix, eh? In MPEG4, you say? by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Dammit... forgot to select plain old text...

      File:The Matrix [DivX].avi
      Length:606580736 Bytes,592364KB
      UUHash:=NU+6vO//nt1xRJWKvtxhMM2gmL A=

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
  77. FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now how about running the technically superior FreeBSD operating system instead of some Unix(tm) wannabe without a stable vm and filesystem?

  78. Why Linux at All? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    Why have linux in the process at all? If you can win2k on top of linux on the xbox hardware using some sort of VMWare like product, why not just get win2k to work on the xbox itself? Most of the hardware is stardard pc stuff anyway with the exception of video.

    1. Re:Why Linux at All? by Zapdos · · Score: 2

      I guess that win2k on the Xbox isnt a project goal for the The Xbox Linux Project. The Xbox Linux Project aims to provide a version of GNU/Linux for the Xbox, so that it can be used as an ordinary computer. Linux should make use of all Xbox hardware and allow to install and run software from standard i386 Linux distributions.

  79. Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck cares. What a childish waste of time. Something dribbling down your chin.

  80. What about Basilisk II? by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

    OK, so it isn't PPC, but there's a fully functional 68K Mac emulator for Linux called Basilisk II. I use it to run Escape Velocity on my PC under Mac OS 8.1.

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
  81. Next step by Banjonardo · · Score: 2
    Now, of course, they need to install winlinux and run it from windows, which is running from linux, which is running from an xbox.

    Rinse and repeat!

    --

    -----

    Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    1. Re:Next step by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      I should have winlinux running on Windows 2000 running on linux running from my X-box emulator I installed on WINE on top of Linux on my Mac... just as soon as I get Mac0S off the machine.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  82. You Pay for Windows????? Noob! by HamNRye · · Score: 2

    I can't believe that you are actually talking about paying for windows.... Steal it. Gates and Ballmer *want* you to steal it. Porn looks better on a pirated OS. Learn all about FTP...

    Hammy

  83. re: what visulaistion software by physman · · Score: 1

    what visuliation software?
    wine?
    xwine?

    were did tux-racer come from?

    --
    Murphy's Law of Research: Enough research will tend to support your theory.
  84. There shorts by randomErr · · Score: 2

    Linux guys are creaming their shorts, MS guys are crappin' in their.

    'had to be said.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  85. That monitor.. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    Looks like a Commodore 1902 or 1084!

  86. emulate by voot · · Score: 1

    another way to could go about it would make it boot unix and then emulate the xbox

  87. Re:Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, nice! Also recommended is double bubble comics.

  88. I do have it. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I'll go try again, but I'm sure I've got the right codec.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  89. Damn it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can't you geeks just masturbate normally like everyone else?

  90. Re: I am wondering why! by cscx · · Score: 2

    One might think that, but that stopped being true a while ago.

  91. Yawn. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

    Wake me when you don't need a hardware mod to install linux, and you can still play games afterwards.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  92. Playstation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about Linux running on X-BOx with a Playstation emulator?

    That'd really kick some serious ass!!

  93. Test by McNihil · · Score: 1

    Checking out the stuff... never mind.

  94. SYSTEM FAILURE by capnjack41 · · Score: 1

    MY favorite part was at the end where it said "system failure". Or is that a Windows Media error message? (wakka wakka)

  95. I'm talking apples vs apples though. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    What about compared to a PC with 64mb of ram?

    I'm just curious if the memory interface is better than what's currently on PCs.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:I'm talking apples vs apples though. by m1ch43l · · Score: 1

      Take a 733MHz P-III + 10GB HD + a GF4 Ti4200 (or an OC'd GF3 Ti500) + an nForce based motherboard + 64MB of RAM + a DVD-Rom and you've got a X-Box...
      So, in response to your post... it's exactly the same.

  96. Ahhh!! You're right. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I just grabbed the latest divx. (I was one version old.) Problem solved.

    Thanks for pointing out the obvious!

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  97. Nope by Bastian · · Score: 2

    Because Wine is a wrapper - it doesn't implement the various GUI calls on Windows, it simply translates them to equivalent calls (or strings of calls) for X. If the XBox doesn't have these calls at all, you'd have to reimplement them from the ground up. The knowledge the Wine project has on the Windows API would be useful for this, but the Wine code most likely wouldn't.

  98. Re:Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to break it to you, but that really wasn't funny. At all. Not even slashdot funny (a funny just below Carrot Top).

  99. Bochs already ported to XBox (and it runs Windows) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Linux on the XBox is truly a great accomplishment and it deserves the limelight, but we shouldn't forget the other homebrew projects that have made owning an XBox like owning just about every popular, classic console. Here's a list of consoles that have had emulators ported to the XBox:

    Atari 2600, Gameboy/Gameboy Color, Gameboy Advance, Game Gear/Sega Master System, Commodore-64, Atari Lynx, TurboGrafx-16/PC-Engine, NeoGeo Pocket Color, NES/Famicom, SNES/Super Famicom, Genesis/Megadrive, MAME, and X86 (Bochs).

    Here's a website for most of the above:

    http://xport.xb-power.com

    There are pre-made packages for the "Bochs for XBox" project that run DOS 6.22, Windows 3.11, and Windows 95. Granted, Windows 95 runs too slowly to do anything truly useful, but it runs. Bochs on XBox does a great job of emulating all those great old DOS games, though. These people, along with the other XBox home-brewers, should also be commended for their fine work.

  100. Re:Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows by swillden · · Score: 1

    What wasn't?

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  101. To find out ? by Quazion · · Score: 2

    It runs even faster and better with less memory usage!

  102. Get a fuckin life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a life people! good grief!

  103. Re:Presumably they chose Windows 2000 over Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should get out more then

  104. Wow, what sma-rt-s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you're a fucking clever one, arn't you? Say, could you pop 'round and help my mom with her AOL. I dunna-now what all those shiny buttons do!

  105. But it's not... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    One of the big reasons the Xbox can't load windows is because the memory architecture is a lot different from what I understand.

    So I'd like to see how Xbox memory arch compares to PC memory arch.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  106. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Convention organizer to Linus Torvalds: "You might like to come with us
    to some licensed[1] place, and have some pizza."

    Linus: "Oh, I did not know that you needed a license to eat pizza".

    [1] Licenced - refers in Australia to a restaurant which has government
    licence to sell liquor.
    -- Linus at a talk at the Melbourne University

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...