An Australian epidemic of carpal tunnel syndrome ended in the mid-1980s when the government ruled it would no longer compensate workers for the condition.
Similarly, U.S. studies have shown more cases are diagnosed when workers can make claims. Emotional stress, substance abuse and family environment can amplify body symptoms, expert say.
This statment implies that CTS is faked -- or the person has something else, but they claim it's a condition that is a class that is they can be compensated for.
Verbal score on a GRE, I thought it was a silent test.
I sued MSI/TLC for sorehands, them Mattel took over.
I sued Mattel for trying to shut me up by using illegal litigation. Just like they did with others.
Keep in mind, if you say something they don't like, they may try to bankrupt you with litigation. And as a condition of settlement, they would require you to only say nice things about them.
The article implies that it's a hoax. That it was eliminated in Australia when you could not make a claim for it. Actually according to people in Australia, it's just treated...none of this rubbish that I had to go through with Mattel/MSI/TLC.
But, many people clump all RSIs are CTS. Some doctors will either decide Carpal tunnel or tendinitis. If it's CTS they cut, if it's tendinitis, they use drugs and tell you to change careers.
What you have to keep in mind is that if you rest, there will be reocvery. If you correct the ergonomics, and rest it won't be a problem after you recover. If you put your hand in a fire, take it out, then let it heal, your hand won't hurt.
I don't have breast cancer, so cancer must not exist.
I spent three weeks in Hoboken, NJ and don't have lung cancer, so lung cancer must not exist.
They have shown that people with CTS have denervations in the median nerve that are relieved with surgery. I find that to be convincing evidence of a condition.
You don't need a 1:1 correlation on cause and effect to establish an existence of a condition. Things besides typing cause CTS and other RSIs.
After sitting on hold for 40 minutes. "Please remove TCP/IP, then re-install it." Why? "because we found it always solves the problem -- I guaranty it!". Will you bet $1000 on it? "I can't do that."But it works fine on my LAN. "Oh, your computer is hooked up to LAN hardware, we can't support it." But your cablemodem is LAN hardware. "No, it's a modem.
"We will have a technician come to you in 4 days between 8am and 1 pm. If it's your problem, you will be charged."CLICK
When they attackour rights, they use the standard war cry, "It is to protect children.
The other one is it is for your safety. They have metal detectors and x-ray machines at federal buildings because of the Oklahoma bombing. If they had metal detectors then, McVeigh would have been prevented from driving a bomb up to the side of the building.
The criminal charges were not mentioned. Or was it just the University police.
Check the rules of the University, see if they own whatever is placed on their server. If not, then they destroyed your copywriten code. Since they were not your employer, they don't have any sort of automatic right to it -- which means unless you explicitly given it to them and they compensated you for it, it's yours! Since it's a state school you have due process rights.
Actually it is libel, slander is spoken defamation.
Please explain the statement that 2600 has made. What 2600 did is register httpfuckgeneralmotors.com and have it resolve to 164.109.135.183 which is Ford's website. Ford claims that this implies that Ford has done this. Even if it did imply that Ford did this, it only implies that Ford is low class -- not something actionable under libel. In a Mass. case, calling a couple (who ran a restraunt) pigs was not actionable.
But the idea that the pickets
were prohibited from discussing their grievance struck me as Just Plain Odd.
This strikes me as more disturbing than odd. But, since Mattel attempted to silence me I can understand where they are comming from. The dealership may have got an injunction or threatened a lawsuit to keep them from talking about it. There are statutes to prevent that, but it costs money to protect your own rights until a few large corporations have been required to pay large amounts of money because they used abusive litigation to extort silence.
.... and there a courts to take this issue to before one resorts to picketing.
That is not true. Courts are supposed to enforce laws and contracts. The courts usually do not enforce fairness and decency. means. Look at the SAG pickets -- there was no law or contract, but they were applying pressure to get a contract.
On the issue of risks, you are correct to an extent. But, that has it's limit -- look at OSHA and workers compensation.
ON finances, how much research are you supposed to do? There has been cases where courts have held that On a job interview, I asked if the company had income or if they were getting angel funding. I worked for a place that owes me over $20k in back pay, but they have no money. It's common in the.bombs. In one place, my first paycheck bounced.
Here in the USA, many people seem take the attitude, "Get over it and work for a living or If you any good, you'd get another job.
How many times have you walked by a building with two people picketing and not paid attention to why they were picketing? It seems as though many people don't care about an issue until it effects them.
You forgot: They can fiel a lawsuit against any website that discuss the newsgroups of have a link. Then they can file a lawsuit against any newsreader software publisher that does not specifically block any.mp3 file from being downloaded.
In some areas, underground rights are seperate from above ground rights. The trains had right of way and were able to grant permission to lay cable ON the ground.
I'm going to bet that the telcos will file a lawsuit for fraud against the railways. They granted (for a price) them use of area they did not have rights to grant. Then some lawyer will get hit with a malpractice lawsuit for not catching it.
I found that it's not the keyboard style, but is the fit of the keyboard to the person. Using the Microsoft Natural keyboard actually made things worse. I have read at several studies that conclude that keyboard fit is more important than style of keyboard.
What's more important is the positioning and taking regular breaks. I found that regular icing helps.
There is a law that allows the government to seize all profits and items used in a crime -- it's called forfeiture law.
This has been used against individuals as part of the drug war. This has been used unfairly and unjustly. One person who had been arrested for drunk driving lost his car, though he was found not guilty. A woman lost her car, because her husband was arrested in it for getting a blow-job from a prostitue.
The same penalty applied to a corporation could take all assetts of a corporation since it would be intermingled. No money -- no corporation.
How dare you claim that large corporations bully little people! If they hear you say that, they may file a libel suit against you for saying it.
But seriously, it seems as though this has become SOP over the last few years -- pick a defendant that they can litigate into the ground, then go after them. Then, when the little guy surrenders because they can't spend six figures on litigation, the bully claims victory.
Last October, I asked Mattel for how many cases they actually won -- they still have not answered. I wonder why they have not answered.
One, the use of the RBL interferes with the site that is blocked. There is no notice, so there is no way to defend against it.
Two, when you provide the serviuce, you are not being notified about what is being blocked. In the above.net situation one is made to believe that there is a server problem. In a censorware situation, you are told that the site has bad material.
In the case of censorware, you (or your taxes) are paying for a service that is flawed.
The blocked site can file lawsuits against above.net for intentionally interferance. This is the same type of lawsuit that could be filed against censorware publishers for wrongfully putting a site on the blocked list.
The difference between a censorware list is that you don't have a libel claim...or do you. The above net practice could give the impression of bad system operations or of being a spammer.
If you look at the clickwrap and the UCITA, these damages from known bugs are limited.
Think of the graduating senior who now has to go to summer school instead of working for tuition money. This could delay their degree by a year. All caused by a known bug!
Slashdot Mirror
This statment implies that CTS is faked -- or the person has something else, but they claim it's a condition that is a class that is they can be compensated for.
Verbal score on a GRE, I thought it was a silent test.
I sued Mattel for trying to shut me up by using illegal litigation. Just like they did with others.
Keep in mind, if you say something they don't like, they may try to bankrupt you with litigation. And as a condition of settlement, they would require you to only say nice things about them.
But, many people clump all RSIs are CTS. Some doctors will either decide Carpal tunnel or tendinitis. If it's CTS they cut, if it's tendinitis, they use drugs and tell you to change careers.
What you have to keep in mind is that if you rest, there will be reocvery. If you correct the ergonomics, and rest it won't be a problem after you recover. If you put your hand in a fire, take it out, then let it heal, your hand won't hurt.
I spent three weeks in Hoboken, NJ and don't have lung cancer, so lung cancer must not exist.
They have shown that people with CTS have denervations in the median nerve that are relieved with surgery. I find that to be convincing evidence of a condition.
You don't need a 1:1 correlation on cause and effect to establish an existence of a condition. Things besides typing cause CTS and other RSIs.
After sitting on hold for 40 minutes.
"Please remove TCP/IP, then re-install it." Why? "because we found it always solves the problem -- I guaranty it!". Will you bet $1000 on it? "I can't do that."But it works fine on my LAN. "Oh, your computer is hooked up to LAN hardware, we can't support it." But your cablemodem is LAN hardware. "No, it's a modem.
"We will have a technician come to you in 4 days between 8am and 1 pm. If it's your problem, you will be charged."CLICK
A new form of TV advertising, computer control. Just like product placement.
The other one is it is for your safety. They have metal detectors and x-ray machines at federal buildings because of the Oklahoma bombing. If they had metal detectors then, McVeigh would have been prevented from driving a bomb up to the side of the building.
Check the rules of the University, see if they own whatever is placed on their server. If not, then they destroyed your copywriten code. Since they were not your employer, they don't have any sort of automatic right to it -- which means unless you explicitly given it to them and they compensated you for it, it's yours! Since it's a state school you have due process rights.
Please explain the statement that 2600 has made. What 2600 did is register httpfuckgeneralmotors.com and have it resolve to 164.109.135.183 which is Ford's website. Ford claims that this implies that Ford has done this. Even if it did imply that Ford did this, it only implies that Ford is low class -- not something actionable under libel. In a Mass. case, calling a couple (who ran a restraunt) pigs was not actionable.
Ford is suing 2600 for implying that Ford is sponsoring the www.fuckgeneralmotors.com domain because 2600 is pointing the domain to Ford.
This is a situation where Sony is actually stating that this non-existant person actually works for this newspaper.
This strikes me as more disturbing than odd. But, since Mattel attempted to silence me I can understand where they are comming from. The dealership may have got an injunction or threatened a lawsuit to keep them from talking about it. There are statutes to prevent that, but it costs money to protect your own rights until a few large corporations have been required to pay large amounts of money because they used abusive litigation to extort silence.
On the issue of risks, you are correct to an extent. But, that has it's limit -- look at OSHA and workers compensation.
ON finances, how much research are you supposed to do? There has been cases where courts have held that On a job interview, I asked if the company had income or if they were getting angel funding. I worked for a place that owes me over $20k in back pay, but they have no money. It's common in the .bombs. In one place, my first paycheck bounced.
Here in the USA, many people seem take the attitude, "Get over it and work for a living or If you any good, you'd get another job.
How many times have you walked by a building with two people picketing and not paid attention to why they were picketing? It seems as though many people don't care about an issue until it effects them.
I'm going to bet that the telcos will file a lawsuit for fraud against the railways. They granted (for a price) them use of area they did not have rights to grant. Then some lawyer will get hit with a malpractice lawsuit for not catching it.
What's more important is the positioning and taking regular breaks. I found that regular icing helps.
This has been used against individuals as part of the drug war. This has been used unfairly and unjustly. One person who had been arrested for drunk driving lost his car, though he was found not guilty. A woman lost her car, because her husband was arrested in it for getting a blow-job from a prostitue.
The same penalty applied to a corporation could take all assetts of a corporation since it would be intermingled. No money -- no corporation.
But seriously, it seems as though this has become SOP over the last few years -- pick a defendant that they can litigate into the ground, then go after them. Then, when the little guy surrenders because they can't spend six figures on litigation, the bully claims victory.
Last October, I asked Mattel for how many cases they actually won -- they still have not answered. I wonder why they have not answered.
Two, when you provide the serviuce, you are not being notified about what is being blocked. In the above.net situation one is made to believe that there is a server problem. In a censorware situation, you are told that the site has bad material.
In the case of censorware, you (or your taxes) are paying for a service that is flawed.
The difference between a censorware list is that you don't have a libel claim...or do you. The above net practice could give the impression of bad system operations or of being a spammer.
Think of the graduating senior who now has to go to summer school instead of working for tuition money. This could delay their degree by a year. All caused by a known bug!
Should the software company be held harmless?