I'm growing tired of hearing about android when they only have one phone available in the US. how about no more android news until they release a new phone. deal? ok thanks
I really have to give them credit...the big blue monster has come a long way...
First they weren't going to mess with cloud offerings, now they're banking their future on the cloud (Live Framework, Windows Azure, Mesh, Office Live, etc.). They use-to guard their code like a proprietary pitbull and shun opensource, now they have a site set-up for the sole purpose of facilitating distribution of open source code (codeplex.com). And the difference between the philosophy behind IE6 vs. IE8? Night and day.
Say what you will about Microsoft (with much of it being true), they are making an effort at evolving, and it's an effort that you don't see very often out of similarly positioned companies (look no further than the U.S. automakers for a perfect example of this).
Props to high dollar execs being able to both admit they were wrong and make a change to fix it.
Besides, what's stopping people from buying from other online stores like Amazon?
Not a d@mn thing...which is why I haven't opened my iTunes in over 6 months and have saved tons of money in the process. With the specials that Amazon runs on album downloads (new releases for $2.99/3.99), massive compilations for $5.00, never more than $0.99/song, AND DRM free...I don't see myself ever opening iTunes again...
Um, but a Pre, Storm, or ANY OTHER SUBSIDIZED DEVICE FROM ANY PHONE VENDOR, and you're fucked into a 2 year deal.
True, other vendors force you to sign a 2-year contract in exchange for subsidizing your phone purchase BUT ONLY AT&T (to the best of my knowledge) forces you to extend your current obligation to another 2-years and forces users to pay an un-subsidized chunk of change to get the new phone.
Do NOT blame Apple for the failing of the US government to regulate such practices.
Man, it is precisely this type of stupid @ss, spoiled brat, "don't-touch-mysh!t" mind-set that is so wrong and the cause of so many problems that I can't even...ok, before I get lost in my disgust, let me just state the following:
Apple is merely the handset maker, not the service provider, which is why I was bagging on AT&T about the service restrictions, not Apple (though plenty could be said about the wisdom of Apple choosing AT&T).
The government should not have to force businesses via regulation to act in a customer-friendly manner. Merely because the regulation does not exist doesn't mean that a business should do it. If a business chooses to do something ethically-questionable solely because nobody told them that they couldn't, that says a great deal about that business.
Example of practical "non-hacker" backgrounding: I ride my bicycle, using a FREE APP to track my GPS route and getting audible mileage updates throughout my ride, while listening to a streaming podcast (on a FREE APP) AND am able to get audible notices of my new emails received via Exchange (on a FREE APP), any new instant messages/SMS messages/calls. I can also answer a call while leaving everything running. I'm afraid that your lack of understanding about concurrent processes is the only reason why you fail to see the importance.
Your lack of experience with Android and the Android Market is clear in your feeble assessment. Everything I did on my iPhone, as well as everything I currently do on my iPod Touch, I can easily do on my Android G1 phone. Further, I can do way, way more on my Android G1 and do it much more easily.
The iPhone's OS isn't evolving any faster than Android...the main difference is that OS upgrades are free on Android and that Android started by providing core, base-line mobile phone functionality in addition to all the advanced functionality. How's that photo SMS functionality on the iPhone working for you? Oh...that's right...
Spec for Spec, the Pro line is CHEAPER than the competition!
What competition? Apple won't allow any direct competition!
You like your iPhone, I like my G1...we shall clearly have to agree to disagree. However, don't go blaming the government, AT&T, the Easter Bunny or whomever for the failings of Apple and/or Apple's products. Steve & Co. are big boys...it's about time that they start being held accountable for their decisions.
Personally, one of my fav Android apps is Locale, which monitors your GPS location for user-designated locations and assigns the appropriate settings to your phone. For example, I walk into work and my ringer automatically turns off...I leave work, my ringer turns back on. No worrying about forgetting to turn my ringer back on and missing calls...and this is just one example.
I get phone calls and my auto reverse-lookup gives me caller-id for non-contacts (even cell phones), I can move data from one program to another without closing either...the list goes on and on.
The sad thing is that there are so many users who have been stupefied with Apple's "Whiz, Bang, WOW" marketing and will never know what it's like to have a mobile phone that truly allows you to do more, without limitation.
Again, maybe it's just me, but I prefer performance over pretty packaging...
Therein lies the rub...you just trapped yourself into another 2-year AT&T (assuming you're American) contract for upgrading to the 3G S...a phone that is unable to perform the simplest of mobile phone tasks and, apparently, is difficult to make a call on it without receiving 3rd degree burns on your face.
If you're happy with that, more power to ya'...personally, I chose to do a little research, compare core functionality (current and future), and bought the best phone on the market, not just the prettiest.
I attended a presentation on Tuesday, hosted by the Kansas City AMA chapter (marketing, not medical). The presenters were Chris Haas of Google and Drew Mitchell of YouTube. I was immediately struck by how frequently both presenters mentioned augmented reality, something that (in my experience) has been relegated to sci-fi stories and hypothetical tech discussions.
Now, I'm not intending to make some sort of "Google is going into augmented reality" statement, as I am clearly in no position to make such a claim, but what I can say is that it is clearly on the radar for them (especially when put within the context of Wave). I just think that it is a very dynamic time, almost frighteningly so, for technology. It will be interesting to see where we go from here and how quickly we get there...
Plagiarism has no meaning outside of an academic institution. It's an academic offence, not a legal one[1]. That's why you can't sue someone for doing it.
This is incorrect. The original author can sue for unauthorized use of his/her work against the plagiarist and recover actual and/or punitive damages. While not a criminal offense per se, a person who plagiarizes can easily be sued for fraud or copyright infringement, depending on the laws of the applicable jurisdiction.
So glad that I could supply the amusement, and I apologize if the troll branding was unwarranted.
I appreciate your perspective and believe that your additional explanation regarding the increased CO2 removal has merit - increased CO2 removal is a great thing. However, the device requires energy input, which makes it only 80% effective. And what do we do with the liquid CO2 output that these devices create? Landfill? Float it around on a barge? Sound familiar?
My overarching point, from the beginning, is this: why are we continuing to spend so much time/energy/resources to find a way for us to continue to live in a self-destructive manner? Why don't we work to find a viable solution for changing our behavior, rather than creating a device that allows us to perpetuate the problem-causing behavior?
And, as far as "those other useful things" like biodiversity, water conservation, decreasing soil erosion, protection from sun exposure...if we aren't able to resolve all of these growing problems, having a fake tree that removes atmospheric CO2 is as worthless as putting sunblock on under your swimsuit.
Jeeze...I'm so glad that somebody used time, energy, resources and money (likely including government grant funding) to come up with a product that DOES THE SAME F-ING THING AS A NATURALLY OCCURRING, FREE TREE.
Holy hell - has the world gone mad?!? "Let's take a free, naturally sustaining object - one that provides reduced energy consumption, decreases CO2, decreases soil erosion, protects from excessive sun exposure, maintains ecosystem diversity, assists in water conservation, provides tangible resources, etc. - and use our dwindling financial and energy resources to create an imitation that doesn't do half that of the natural object...BRILLIANT!"
This may have application in places where real trees can no longer grow, but...my god...are we really that lazy that we can't plant a freakin' tree?!?
This is such an overly simplistic, naive comment that I don't even know where to start.
If the Iranians are so in "love" with this "brutal Islamic theocracy", then why are they taking to the streets by the thousands, risking death, fighting for the reform candidate?
I am in no way saying that the people have clean hands when it comes to their current predicament, but there are many, many other forces at play here.
If the overwhelming majority of Iranians (like the overwhelming majority of Poles) truly support democracy, human rights, and peace with Israel, then a liberal Western democracy will arise -- without any violence.
This is easily the most deluded, asinine statement that I have ever read on Slashdot. As if there is some magic check-list that, once met, the peace fairy will visit your nation and all will be right with the world.
Look back through history...are there any representative democracies (assuming that this is what you were referencing in "liberal Western democracy" that arose without bloodshed, pain and suffering? America? Nope. France? Anywhere in Europe? Not even close...the evolution of democracy in Europe (and the rest of the world) was a direct result of wars, revolutions, and other socioeconomic pressures. To imply otherwise is foolish
While I fully agree that America should keep its bloody, "nation-building" hands off of Iran (as should the rest of the world), this kindergarten concept of "if they want democracy it will happen" is disingenuous.
So who, pray tell, wants to be toting around freakin' bricks of gold?! People get killed for their freakin' shoes, yet somebody thinks it's a good idea to carry around bricks of gold?
And they're going to charge 30% more than current market value?!?
I'm sorry, but this sounds like the most asinine idea ever.
Not at all! For genes to prosper, the do not merely have to allow for themself to transfer.
In this case, the man was 32 years. Well within reproductive range, even in a primitive ages.
If it is in the genes, it means individuals with a tendency to suicide does actually tend to generate more surviving offspring than others.
Obviously there cannot be a direct way for suicide to benefit reproduction. Thus one must look at the group as a whole. One theory could be that suicide of individuals in the face of hardship is a net benefit to the group, freeing up food and resources for the remaining survivors.
I think your understanding of genetics is slightly askew.
A genetic trait that can be inherited is not inherently beneficial nor does it inherently generate a greater number of surviving offspring. It is merely an inherited genetic trait - it's the propensity for the development of that trait (dominant vs. recessive) that is driven by natural selection.
What I enjoy about Hackers is this: they are a check to the system, regardless of the system, the system's owner, or how much money/resources that system's owner has at his disposal.
Now, if only all hackers acted with "Robbin Hood" mores rather than juvenile pumpkin-smashing vandals...
Assuming that you're in the U.S., you should understand that anything you have at school has limited "personal" qualities. From the most recent case (Redding) to a number of historic cases (Board of Ed v. Earls, NJ v. TLO, etc.), the Supreme Court has clearly enumerated student's limited expectation of privacy.
While I understand that this isn't directly what you asked, it's important that you understand the realities of taking your computer to school with you - the least of your worries is fellow classmates using your computer.
There comes a time in everybody's life where we have to recognize that we cannot (nor should we) control every aspect of our child's life. Every time a child leaves the care of his/her parent, both are presented with opportunity. The child receives an opportunity to navigate a situation independently, learning to evaluate and rely upon their own abilities. The parent receives an opportunity to begin that process of "letting go", in addition to developing faith in the child's ability to care for himself/herself.
While I agree that it is painfully horrifying to confront the "what could happen" scenarios, subjecting a child to a constant police state environment will cause numerous forms of blow-back, both for the child and the parent.
The point is that the crazy beliefs of a religion are up front. You don't find about "body thetans" until OTIII and about 300k is down the drain.
Point taken and I generally agree with you. Scientology is completely crazy at best, a scary suppressive, (allegedly) murderous regime at worst. You're RIAA analogy is apt...maybe even generous.
However, the point I was trying to make is that we should be a little more hesitant to condemn a section of society without taking a moment to contemplate the root cause that led to this recurring problem.
What is it about us what makes us so willing (sometimes longing) to believe the supernatural? Why do we believe fantastic stories told by men while we disbelieve irrefutable facts we hold in our hands? Did society fail these people who become so consumed by their beliefs?
I don't pretend to have the answers to such questions, but it is imperative that we don't dismiss issues like this (fringe organizations, radical religious terrorist, suicidal cults, etc.) as a THEM issue, because it's not - this is an US issue, as history has sadly shown us time and time again. We need to begin to ask the more probing questions, rather than hiding comfortably behind the "wouldn't happen to me" facade. Once we do this, we can begin to understand not only why this continues to happen, but how to prevent it from happening in the future.
To date, the way we continue to deal with such issues is the equivalent of complaining about the room temperature while trapped in a burning building.
It's when a PERSON decides they are going to leverage it in order to force a behavior that the shit gets all fucked up.
You're missing the point...PEOPLE create religion. Before issuing religion a free pass as being "benign", you should first ask why people chose to create religion.
Further, to your point of "leverage...to force behavior, the entire goal of religion is to elicit a defined behavior. Are you trying to say that as long as you agree with the elicited behavior than the religion is ok?
Slashdot Mirror
I'm growing tired of hearing about android when they only have one phone available in the US. how about no more android news until they release a new phone. deal? ok thanks
FAIL
I really have to give them credit...the big blue monster has come a long way...
First they weren't going to mess with cloud offerings, now they're banking their future on the cloud (Live Framework, Windows Azure, Mesh, Office Live, etc.). They use-to guard their code like a proprietary pitbull and shun opensource, now they have a site set-up for the sole purpose of facilitating distribution of open source code (codeplex.com). And the difference between the philosophy behind IE6 vs. IE8? Night and day.
Say what you will about Microsoft (with much of it being true), they are making an effort at evolving, and it's an effort that you don't see very often out of similarly positioned companies (look no further than the U.S. automakers for a perfect example of this).
Props to high dollar execs being able to both admit they were wrong and make a change to fix it.
You would like a factually incorrect post to be modded up?
Care to elaborate, or are you going to take the "it's wrong 'cause I say it's wrong" stance?
My kingdom for some mod points...
Somebody please mod this awesome comment up...nicely done, Em
Besides, what's stopping people from buying from other online stores like Amazon?
Not a d@mn thing...which is why I haven't opened my iTunes in over 6 months and have saved tons of money in the process. With the specials that Amazon runs on album downloads (new releases for $2.99/3.99), massive compilations for $5.00, never more than $0.99/song, AND DRM free...I don't see myself ever opening iTunes again...
But, then again, that's just me...
"Hello? Umm, yeah...just a second...
Hey Apple - there's somebody at the door for you. He says he's with the Justice Department..."
Um, but a Pre, Storm, or ANY OTHER SUBSIDIZED DEVICE FROM ANY PHONE VENDOR, and you're fucked into a 2 year deal.
True, other vendors force you to sign a 2-year contract in exchange for subsidizing your phone purchase BUT ONLY AT&T (to the best of my knowledge) forces you to extend your current obligation to another 2-years and forces users to pay an un-subsidized chunk of change to get the new phone.
Do NOT blame Apple for the failing of the US government to regulate such practices.
Man, it is precisely this type of stupid @ss, spoiled brat, "don't-touch-mysh!t" mind-set that is so wrong and the cause of so many problems that I can't even...ok, before I get lost in my disgust, let me just state the following:
Spec for Spec, the Pro line is CHEAPER than the competition!
What competition? Apple won't allow any direct competition!
You like your iPhone, I like my G1...we shall clearly have to agree to disagree. However, don't go blaming the government, AT&T, the Easter Bunny or whomever for the failings of Apple and/or Apple's products. Steve & Co. are big boys...it's about time that they start being held accountable for their decisions.
Amen. And I'm a former iPhone user...
Personally, one of my fav Android apps is Locale, which monitors your GPS location for user-designated locations and assigns the appropriate settings to your phone. For example, I walk into work and my ringer automatically turns off...I leave work, my ringer turns back on. No worrying about forgetting to turn my ringer back on and missing calls...and this is just one example.
I get phone calls and my auto reverse-lookup gives me caller-id for non-contacts (even cell phones), I can move data from one program to another without closing either...the list goes on and on.
The sad thing is that there are so many users who have been stupefied with Apple's "Whiz, Bang, WOW" marketing and will never know what it's like to have a mobile phone that truly allows you to do more, without limitation.
Again, maybe it's just me, but I prefer performance over pretty packaging...
and I don;t have to break a contract to get it
Therein lies the rub...you just trapped yourself into another 2-year AT&T (assuming you're American) contract for upgrading to the 3G S...a phone that is unable to perform the simplest of mobile phone tasks and, apparently, is difficult to make a call on it without receiving 3rd degree burns on your face.
If you're happy with that, more power to ya'...personally, I chose to do a little research, compare core functionality (current and future), and bought the best phone on the market, not just the prettiest.
I attended a presentation on Tuesday, hosted by the Kansas City AMA chapter (marketing, not medical). The presenters were Chris Haas of Google and Drew Mitchell of YouTube. I was immediately struck by how frequently both presenters mentioned augmented reality, something that (in my experience) has been relegated to sci-fi stories and hypothetical tech discussions.
Now, I'm not intending to make some sort of "Google is going into augmented reality" statement, as I am clearly in no position to make such a claim, but what I can say is that it is clearly on the radar for them (especially when put within the context of Wave). I just think that it is a very dynamic time, almost frighteningly so, for technology. It will be interesting to see where we go from here and how quickly we get there...
Plagiarism has no meaning outside of an academic institution. It's an academic offence, not a legal one[1]. That's why you can't sue someone for doing it.
This is incorrect. The original author can sue for unauthorized use of his/her work against the plagiarist and recover actual and/or punitive damages. While not a criminal offense per se, a person who plagiarizes can easily be sued for fraud or copyright infringement, depending on the laws of the applicable jurisdiction.
So glad that I could supply the amusement, and I apologize if the troll branding was unwarranted.
I appreciate your perspective and believe that your additional explanation regarding the increased CO2 removal has merit - increased CO2 removal is a great thing. However, the device requires energy input, which makes it only 80% effective. And what do we do with the liquid CO2 output that these devices create? Landfill? Float it around on a barge? Sound familiar?
My overarching point, from the beginning, is this: why are we continuing to spend so much time/energy/resources to find a way for us to continue to live in a self-destructive manner? Why don't we work to find a viable solution for changing our behavior, rather than creating a device that allows us to perpetuate the problem-causing behavior?
And, as far as "those other useful things" like biodiversity, water conservation, decreasing soil erosion, protection from sun exposure...if we aren't able to resolve all of these growing problems, having a fake tree that removes atmospheric CO2 is as worthless as putting sunblock on under your swimsuit.
You missed the part where a "real tree" does an infinite list of additional things beyond removing CO2?
Be honest, it's easier for you to deal with my critique if you can dismiss me as some two-dimensional, tree-hugging nature lover...
As for my personal preferences, I make my living working with those "big, scary, cold, artificial" things...but nice try, troll.
Jeeze...I'm so glad that somebody used time, energy, resources and money (likely including government grant funding) to come up with a product that DOES THE SAME F-ING THING AS A NATURALLY OCCURRING, FREE TREE.
Holy hell - has the world gone mad?!? "Let's take a free, naturally sustaining object - one that provides reduced energy consumption, decreases CO2, decreases soil erosion, protects from excessive sun exposure, maintains ecosystem diversity, assists in water conservation, provides tangible resources, etc. - and use our dwindling financial and energy resources to create an imitation that doesn't do half that of the natural object...BRILLIANT!"
This may have application in places where real trees can no longer grow, but...my god...are we really that lazy that we can't plant a freakin' tree?!?
This is such an overly simplistic, naive comment that I don't even know where to start.
If the Iranians are so in "love" with this "brutal Islamic theocracy", then why are they taking to the streets by the thousands, risking death, fighting for the reform candidate?
I am in no way saying that the people have clean hands when it comes to their current predicament, but there are many, many other forces at play here.
If the overwhelming majority of Iranians (like the overwhelming majority of Poles) truly support democracy, human rights, and peace with Israel, then a liberal Western democracy will arise -- without any violence.
This is easily the most deluded, asinine statement that I have ever read on Slashdot. As if there is some magic check-list that, once met, the peace fairy will visit your nation and all will be right with the world.
Look back through history...are there any representative democracies (assuming that this is what you were referencing in "liberal Western democracy" that arose without bloodshed, pain and suffering? America? Nope. France? Anywhere in Europe? Not even close...the evolution of democracy in Europe (and the rest of the world) was a direct result of wars, revolutions, and other socioeconomic pressures. To imply otherwise is foolish
While I fully agree that America should keep its bloody, "nation-building" hands off of Iran (as should the rest of the world), this kindergarten concept of "if they want democracy it will happen" is disingenuous.
So who, pray tell, wants to be toting around freakin' bricks of gold?! People get killed for their freakin' shoes, yet somebody thinks it's a good idea to carry around bricks of gold?
And they're going to charge 30% more than current market value?!?
I'm sorry, but this sounds like the most asinine idea ever.
Anybody else notice the rabid, hostile tendencies of the typical Mac Fanboy's postings? A little disturbing...
Not at all! For genes to prosper, the do not merely have to allow for themself to transfer.
In this case, the man was 32 years. Well within reproductive range, even in a primitive ages.
If it is in the genes, it means individuals with a tendency to suicide does actually tend to generate more surviving offspring than others.
Obviously there cannot be a direct way for suicide to benefit reproduction. Thus one must look at the group as a whole. One theory could be that suicide of individuals in the face of hardship is a net benefit to the group, freeing up food and resources for the remaining survivors.
I think your understanding of genetics is slightly askew.
A genetic trait that can be inherited is not inherently beneficial nor does it inherently generate a greater number of surviving offspring. It is merely an inherited genetic trait - it's the propensity for the development of that trait (dominant vs. recessive) that is driven by natural selection.
Hello...it's called "receipt of stolen goods", 18 U.S.C. 2315...and interstate commerce, no less...felony, baby.
What I enjoy about Hackers is this: they are a check to the system, regardless of the system, the system's owner, or how much money/resources that system's owner has at his disposal.
Now, if only all hackers acted with "Robbin Hood" mores rather than juvenile pumpkin-smashing vandals...
Man, if this isn't a softball...I'd feel too guilty - like taking candy from a baby...
Assuming that you're in the U.S., you should understand that anything you have at school has limited "personal" qualities. From the most recent case (Redding) to a number of historic cases (Board of Ed v. Earls, NJ v. TLO, etc.), the Supreme Court has clearly enumerated student's limited expectation of privacy.
While I understand that this isn't directly what you asked, it's important that you understand the realities of taking your computer to school with you - the least of your worries is fellow classmates using your computer.
There comes a time in everybody's life where we have to recognize that we cannot (nor should we) control every aspect of our child's life. Every time a child leaves the care of his/her parent, both are presented with opportunity. The child receives an opportunity to navigate a situation independently, learning to evaluate and rely upon their own abilities. The parent receives an opportunity to begin that process of "letting go", in addition to developing faith in the child's ability to care for himself/herself.
While I agree that it is painfully horrifying to confront the "what could happen" scenarios, subjecting a child to a constant police state environment will cause numerous forms of blow-back, both for the child and the parent.
The point is that the crazy beliefs of a religion are up front. You don't find about "body thetans" until OTIII and about 300k is down the drain.
Point taken and I generally agree with you. Scientology is completely crazy at best, a scary suppressive, (allegedly) murderous regime at worst. You're RIAA analogy is apt...maybe even generous.
However, the point I was trying to make is that we should be a little more hesitant to condemn a section of society without taking a moment to contemplate the root cause that led to this recurring problem.
What is it about us what makes us so willing (sometimes longing) to believe the supernatural? Why do we believe fantastic stories told by men while we disbelieve irrefutable facts we hold in our hands? Did society fail these people who become so consumed by their beliefs?
I don't pretend to have the answers to such questions, but it is imperative that we don't dismiss issues like this (fringe organizations, radical religious terrorist, suicidal cults, etc.) as a THEM issue, because it's not - this is an US issue, as history has sadly shown us time and time again. We need to begin to ask the more probing questions, rather than hiding comfortably behind the "wouldn't happen to me" facade. Once we do this, we can begin to understand not only why this continues to happen, but how to prevent it from happening in the future.
To date, the way we continue to deal with such issues is the equivalent of complaining about the room temperature while trapped in a burning building.
Religion itself is benign.
It's when a PERSON decides they are going to leverage it in order to force a behavior that the shit gets all fucked up.
You're missing the point...PEOPLE create religion. Before issuing religion a free pass as being "benign", you should first ask why people chose to create religion.
Further, to your point of "leverage...to force behavior, the entire goal of religion is to elicit a defined behavior. Are you trying to say that as long as you agree with the elicited behavior than the religion is ok?