Slashdot Mirror


Making a Child Locating System

celtic_hackr writes "Well, I never thought I'd be an advocate for placing GPS devices on people. However, since it took less than three days for my local school district to misplace my daughter, I have decided that something needs to be done. By the school district's own admission it has a recurring problem of placing children on the wrong buses. Fortunately, my daughter was located, with no thanks to the local school district. Therefore, I would like input on a way to be able to keep track of my child. I know there are personal tracking devices out there. I have nothing against these systems. But I want more than this. My specification are: 1) a small unobtrusive device I can place on my daughter, 2) an application to pull up on any computer, a map with a dot indicating the real-time position of my child, 3) a handheld device with the equivalent information, 4) [optional] a secure web application/plug-in I can install on my own domain allowing me to track her from anyplace in the world, 5) a means of turning it all off, 6) a Linux based solution of the above. I believe all the pieces for making such a system are out there. Has anyone built anything like this? Is there an open source solution? How would I go about building my own? Has anyone hacked any of these personal trackers before, to serve their own purposes? How does a tinfoil hat wearer engineer such a device to make sure Big-Brother isn't watching too? Can these devices be locked down so only certain devices can pick up the GPS location of an individual locator? What other recommendations do you have?"

1,092 comments

  1. Holy Crap! Calm down by FredFredrickson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holy crap- you are, what we in the biz call, an over-reacting parent. Calm down and take it easy before you destroy your daughter's life.

    That being said- verizon has an application for cell phones that lets you track your children- it's on get it now. I'm sure other carriers have something similar.

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    1. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Duh-boy, cue debates on how much surveillance for your child is really necessary.

      I'd say just let him be a parent and decide what's necessary. He knows his daughter better than we all do.

      --
      ...in bed
    2. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Etrias · · Score: 4, Funny

      Won't somebody think of the children!

      Y'know, I got lost all the time as a kid. I threatened to run away and I think my parents reaction was "go ahead". It's almost as if they didn't want me around.

      ....uhmmm.

      Hang on, I have a phone call to make.

    3. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fred you obviously didn't read the mans requirements!

      Math is hard

    4. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ammit · · Score: 2, Informative

      You only have to read about the Mcanns case to realise this definitely is not over-reacting.

      --
      I argue because it's the internet....and I can.
    5. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by TinBromide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the idea: A pay as you go phone. Pay for a small amount of minutes that you put in her backpack and keep the phone off. Make sure it is off and nobody knows about it (Don't want it stolen or confiscated). Then, when she gets "misplaced", she can call you or somebody she knows.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    6. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you're assuming the guy in the article is honestly trying to track his daughter. one of the clients i work for is a bettered womens advocacy group and shelter. they have horror stories all the time of guys who do the same thing to their wives, ex wives girlfriends etc. its easy enough to rig a cellphone thats GPS enabled to create a tracking device and discreet survailence tool. if you ask me, the whole thing is shady. perhaps its my paranoia light flashing because of my client, i can understand your concern, but 10s of thousands, nay 10s of millions of kids make it thought the school system every year without their parents needing to freak out like that.

    7. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by blueZ3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't mean to be a flame, because as a fellow parent (of toddlers, no less) I understand that it can be an extremely stressful and fear-inducing thing to lose track of your child. But I agree with the parent: get some perspective on things by waiting for a bit before subjecting your daughter to Big-Brother-like monitoring.

      Not only do I think you are overreacting, you are sending the wrong message to your school-age daughter. She doesn't need 24-7 tracking, she needs lessons in dealing with unexpected situations. Instead of jumping directly to an electronic device, teach her what to do if she gets lost... the same strategy that's been used successfully by parents for many, many years: find a "safe" adult (police officer, female adult with kids) and tell them that she's lost. If she's old enough to attend school, she's old enough to learn her phone number and address.

      Besides, if she's anything like most kids, anything you "attach" to her (short of a steel shackle) she is going to remove and leave behind or lose. :-)

      Again, I understand your reaction (on one level) but I think you're overreacting.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    8. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except in the McCann's case the parents willfully left their children all alone in an unlocked apartment room so they could go out with their friends. Their child was kidnapped out of their own bad parenting and selfishness. That's hardly an analogous situation to the one described in the summary.

    9. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      A GOS receiver is as the title imples a receiving only device it does not transmit any data to the GPS satelite or anywhere else for that matter, therefore an increase in the number of GPS receivers certainly does not place any additional load on the GPS satellites.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    10. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol status: Loled

    11. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Funny, I learned to start using Linux in an afternoon. While drinking. --Enough to get started anyway. I had my first Samba server up and running perfectly (compiled from source) that *same* afternoon and Apache was running the next day. I'm sure that it didn't hurt that I was already used to a Unix-style command line from high school and I used Dos on a regular basis on my PC at the time, but I'd never touched Linux before.

      I know I shouldn't have answered you, but when you start throwing in all the extra stereotype "nerd" garbage you really sound like a fucking lunatic who clearly hasn't got the slightest clue of what he's talking about. I suppose you're just a shill.

    12. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Etrias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because we should all live our lives in fear and worry, right?

      I'm not trying to make light of that situation, but I picked up the phrase "fear fuels the economy" from somewhere and if you look around, it does. Watch the news? How many times are they telling you about something dangerous or about how so-and-so is horrible and bad for you. For every fear, there's a market to be sold to. Yes, bad things happen, but in terms of history, we are living in one of the most safest times ever.

    13. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He knows his daughter better than we all do.

      He also knows his school district better than we do. These decisions are never made in a vacuum.

      I would question pursuing the Linux or Open Source solution if others do the job better. It's the safety of your kid that matters here - not your own political correctness.

    14. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by raju1kabir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, because if one bad thing happens to one of seven billion people anywhere in the world, then it makes perfect sense to focus all your energies on making sure it doesn't happen to you.

      More and more proof that the human brain just wasn't meant to comprehend societies as large as ours. The in-built statistical heuristics break down completely and start recommending the most irrational things.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    15. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by vintagepc · · Score: 1

      Why the need to enable tracking? Just get her a cell phone so she can call home when something like this happens... Or even better, make sure the kid knows which bus she's supposed to be on in the first place, and doesn't have to rely on the teacher.

      I don't know about you, but if I got on a school bus and found it occupied by a completely different set of people and a different driver, my first reaction would be to double-check the bus number... not sit down and assume everyone but myself was crazy.

      --
      Evolution - Est. 4500000000 B.C. Don't piss in the gene pool.
    16. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by raju1kabir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a parent who's already posted in this thread, I can only say "+1000, insightful".

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    17. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your signature made a really poor combination with your last sentence...

    18. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by hattig · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sure that a child abductor would quite happily and quickly relocate the transponder from the child onto some innocent third party's vehicle to create an hour or two of confusion and chasing the wrong target instead of using intelligence.

      In the case of the submitter, I would suggest that the child will quickly learn which bus is the correct one to use - give it a week or so. Hell when I was a child I had to walk to and from school myself (not that there were any major roads, or major distances involved) and I bet many others here did too.

      The McCanns left their children home alone whilst on holiday in an unfamiliar country. Their story is a lesson to all those who would do the same. The loss of their daughter is punishment enough, for they surely must feel guilty every day that their child is gone because of their lax parenting, but if she had been found I would hope that they would have been punished. Of course the chances of abduction happening are so small in the first place, however the media would have us believing that "child predators" exist on every corner. The risks from home-alone are usually down to child-inflicted injuries like playing with matches, etc.

    19. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that you and many other people are missing the real problem. Elementary school children can be as young as four at the start of kindergarten. Elementary schools are just too big these days!.
      One elementary school in my town has several thousand students. That is just insane.
      Schools should start small and grow in size. The elementary school should be in your neighborhood. The idea of shipping kindergarten kids like UPS packages to child warehouses is the problem.
      Of course to build more but smaller schools costs money.....

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    20. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Brandee07 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Get her a Firefly or similar device. You can add it to your phone plan or get it prepaid.

      Even very young children can use these. Several of the first graders I used to work with had them, and were perfectly comfortable using them.

      http://www.fireflymobile.com/

    21. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MrLogic17 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go low tech, with some thing the kid can't lose.

      Use a sharpie marker on the kid's tummy, arm, whatever - "My name is [x]. My daddy's phone number is 555-1212"

    22. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      There's a reason the police don't do anything until a person has been missing for 24 (or 48) hours. It's because 999,999 times out of 1,000,000 the "missing" person will turn up before then.

      --
      No sig today...
    23. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Stumbles · · Score: 1

      Glad I don't have a moron like you for a parent. From the sound of it, you'd hardly bat an eye in the same situation. Geesh, the guy was not over-reacting at all. But then you are completely ignorant of the potential, or possible danger his daughter could have been in. Lucky for the OP his daughter actually *was* misplaced and nothing worse happened to her.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    24. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, none of your suggestions help in the case where the child is actually abducted. I (as a parent) see huge value in this day and age in the tracking system the author is requesting. Is the system something I'd use in a "big brother" fashion on a daily basis? Heck, no. BUT, in terms of an insurance policy against the worst case scenario?

      Also, I highly doubt the author is suggesting that his child has no skills in handling the situation.

    25. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap- you are, what we in the biz call, an over-reacting parent. Calm down and take it easy before you destroy your daughter's life.

      Yep. This is a massive overreaction, it's a shame so many parents act like this today. A better thing to do is train your daughter to be independent so she can handle herself in unusual situations. Get her a prepaid cellphone. Get her into martial arts so she can be defend herself. Take her out shooting so show knows how to use a gun and to respect it.

      Just think about it. Would you rather have a daughter that can take care of herself or one that's acclimated to being treated like cattle that needs "authority" to guide and protect her?

      Anyway, please watch the South Park episode "Child Abduction Is Not Funny". The Penn and Teller: Bullshit! episode "Stranger Danger" is also highly relevant.

    26. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " I would like input on a way to be able to keep track of my child."

      no one uses google now days....

      First, your child doesn't need GPS, she needs a cellphone. Why? Because even if you had this magical GPS tracking/locating system you want, there would still be some kind of data communication needed between the child and the laptop. That requires data usage or cellphone usage, so either way you're paying a monthly fee.

      Google child cellphone and the very first result is Best cell phone for kids. In it, it says:
      "Migo is made to use Verizon's optional Chaperon service that lets parents track the phone in real time on their handset or PC. For an additional charge, parents can set up boundaries for where the child can go. If the phone leaves the designated area, a text message alert will be sent to the parent's phone. (Only certain adult handsets are capable of using this service.)"

      So you have the GPS tracking you wanted, plus your child has a cellphone so you can reach them if they're indoors and GPS isn't working so hot, AND you have the added feature you didn't even know you wanted: a text message the instant your child leaves a designated area. Not only that but it all works through your cellphone, so anytime you can't find your kid forget about going "Gee, I forgot to bring the GPS locator handheld with me". It's already setup on your cellphone.

      Oh and sure, all this will cost you a few bucks, but I'm sure it won't cost more than a custom handheld locater and a small unobtrusive device to attach to your daughter and and creating a secure website on your own.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    27. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      You really think that little hand held GPS is transmitting signals all the way back through deep space to the GPS satellite !

    28. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mh1997 · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be more efficient to hire competent people in your school district that know how to put the child on the right bus. Locating them after they are lost is fine, but preventing the problem is better for the child and parent.

      When I was in kindergarten, each student was given a colored bracelet with our name printed on it(My mom put it on me each morning). After school, each bus had a piece of colored cardstock next to the door. The teachers matched the color of our bracelet to the color on the bus. This was in 1972 and didn't require linux or GPS, so it is probably not something you would be interested in.

    29. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When my son was 5 years old, on his first day at school, they forced him to get off the bus at the wrong house 2 miles away. Thank God the parent who was there was a friend of the family. He was traumatized--our friend told us the Bus Driver physically carried him crying and screaming and just sat him on the ground. As soon as he saw Rachel (the mother who often was our baby sitter) he calmed down. She told the bus driver this was not his house, and he replied that this was the address he had for our son and was where he was picked up that morning. That last part was a bold-faced lie because I had put him on the bus myself that morning in front of my house. Rachel's name and address were listed as an emergency contact in the event that neither my wife nor I were home if they needed to call us. I do know that we were the last stop on this drivers route, and this would have enabled him to quit a whole 20 minutes sooner, because he could go straight home after dropping him off.

      Needless to say, after that incident (and after getting nowhere with the school administration or the school board) I took him to school, and my wife picked him up.

      I trust school districts about as far as I could shotput a Boeing 777. A tracking device might be a good idea.

    30. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Great, by writing it on clothing-covered skin all the pedophiles will know his phone number. /s

    31. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Talderas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This may sound crazy, but I'm not understanding how a school can place a child on the wrong bus.

      Do schools commonly mix up bus numbers and drivers so that students have different buses/drivers every day? Am I not mistaken, but isn't that the very reason why they have bus routes? You get the same bus with the same driver. Every day. A bus is broken down one day? Well the kid still has the same bus driver. The driver is sick that day and needs a substitute? Well you have the same bus number.

      The only situation where a kid could be confused is when you have the normal bus broken down AND it's a substitute driver, but those are rare events and the school should be able to communicate the bus changes over the PA.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    32. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My daddy's phone number is 555-1212

      OMG!!! That's my daddy's phone number too!!!

    33. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by celtic_hackr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, for perspective, the local district has had this occur for at least every year for the past five years or more. Further we're talking about a class size of about 200 kindergertners. That's all they have to deal with in the summer at the elementary, except for a few older kids. They lost track of roughly a dozen kids on Friday or about 5% of the class. I'm only discovering this incompetence due to the fact this is the first child I've had at this school.

      While I have and continue to instruct my on daughter how to deal with such situations, she is after all only five. You cannot expect a five year old to deal with much on an independent basis.

      As far as removing, stuff , I put on her, that's unlikely if I tell her she needs to wear it all day. She may break or lose such a thing, but she is mostly obedient to her parents. Besides. if it's jewelry, she'll wear it.

      I may be overreacting, but in the matter of a child's life it's far better to overreact than under react.

      Besides, this has geek factor written all over it.

    34. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the "calm down" advice is good and children should taught what to do when lost, however there are just too many cases where children have no control of the situation an the only way to not find them in a shallow grave is to track them and get to them as fast as possible. I would like to see an open source, easy to build solution to this problem.

      It would also be great for tracking the car when the teen is driving it.

    35. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Gori · · Score: 1

      He basically just wants to have an Open Source solution available if he must use it in the first place.

      You know, the devil you know...

      --
      Complexity is a measure of our ignorance...
    36. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get one of those gps chip things that allow you to track someone and then you put it in a piece of pretty sparkly jewelry and make her wear it all the time.

    37. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

          When I was in kindergarden, they went with the low-tech system. Every kid had a name tag that they had to wear all day. It had their name, grade, teacher, and bus number. Teachers aids were by the buses and would verify the bus number on the tag matched the bus. If they kid got on the wrong bus, they were turned away and walked to the right one.

          How much does it cost for a 3x5 index card and a safety pin? A whole lot less than an electronic tracking system, and recurring cell bills for your kid.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    38. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by vlm · · Score: 1

      find a "safe" adult (police officer, female adult with kids)

      Too complicated and still too paranoid.

      Simpler answer is tell the kid, only ask for help from someone whom is currently ignoring them or obviously wants nothing to do with them. That'll work in any situation.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    39. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach your daugther to:

      * Say her full name
      * Say her full address
      * Say her house phone number
      * Identify a cop or a trusted adult and ask him to help her
      * If old enough (7+ IMO), how to take a bus/train/etc. to reach home

    40. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    41. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by b0bby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's great for trips to Disneyworld etc (though I don't put their name), not what you'd want to do everyday for school. I'm assuming the child is a kindergartner; I'd be hesitant to geo-tag her unless the wrong bus thing happens again. A simple name tag on her lunchbox/backpack might be enough; the driver could then call you.

    42. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    43. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Recently in Austin, Texas, a man in a white van stopped abruptly on the side of a busy street 500 ft from where a school was letting out. He attempted to grab a 10 year old boy and throw him in the van. Luckily, the boy escaped and was able to run another 200 feet to a group of other children accompanied by an adult who called the cops. This was in broad daylight with other adults present (and no one managed to get a license plate number). If this man had gotten a better grip on the boy's back pack, he would have successfully kidnapped that boy. What police officer or safe adult can the child contact now? This is the worst case scenario and it happens more than people without children realize.

      The bus mix up was a simple miscommunication and an opportunity to learn, but that doesn't mean that worse can't happen. On the flip side, as a parent, you really don't want to completely shatter your child's innocence and put them in a constant state of fear. In my mind, an unobtrusive tracking device for young children who live in a large, impersonal urban environment isn't overreacting, it's responsible parenting. "Extremely stressful and fear-inducing" is an understatement when it comes to losing your child.

      http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/child-locator.html
      http://www.zoombak.com/products/universal/
      http://www.amberalertgps.com/

    44. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Doesn't help when she is chopped up at the bottom of the lake. Sure, maybe I am being crude, but it's valid.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    45. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Gori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats interesting. I dont think that human heuristics beak down. We simply have not learaned to live in a world of so much information and technology yet. And the funny thing is, no mater how hard we try, we never will be, so, we keep on trying...

      --
      Complexity is a measure of our ignorance...
    46. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by icebike · · Score: 2, Informative

      24 hour rule does not apply to first graders.

      You watch too much TV.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    47. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rpresser · · Score: 1

      1) The idiom is "bare-faced lie". As an expression, it predates the existence of movable type.
      2) Must be a really slow bus if it would take 20 minutes to drive 2 miles.

    48. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Just be careful about not having her grow up into a person with no self confidence because she was never allowed to do anything by herself. When little, I have gotten on the wrong bus a few times when going home and it was a learning experience. I don't know of kids who purposefully get off at the wrong stop. The just freeze and never get off. (Queue adult to help them.)

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    49. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I was a kid, we had an even simpler and even lower technology plan, which was, never go anywhere without "Matt" and "Dawn".

      If your bus stop has only one kid whom uses it, then move out of the retirement village.

      Another ultra low tech strategy that worked well at various times in my youth, and currently works well for me as a parent, is "buy a house two blocks from school". It is of course uphill both ways in the snow, but, at least its a short walk.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    50. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by icebike · · Score: 1

      Careful reading suggests it was a first couple of days problem.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    51. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rpresser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not paranoid enough. Your index card system relies on teachers, teachers aides, drivers -- the original poster wants to rely on nothing but technology.

    52. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to second this comment. Also, to the posters who are bashing this person, and asking him/her to take the issue up with his/her school system, I think you're all overestimating the ability of many school employees as well as the efficiency with which requests get accommodated in many school systems. In my area, the public schools are completely overrun, mismanaged, and underfunded....badly. Now, I'm not advocating that the person asking for suggestions should try to exert some influence over the school system, but to act as though "fixing" the school's "problems" is easy doesn't really help.

      Besides, is it really that crazy of an idea for the kid to carry a cell phone (with or without GPS)? Nowhere in the post does it say how old the child is. I think some of the people jumping on this "overprotective parent" bandwagon are thinking this kid is some 12-13 year old kid. They might change their tune if (as the parent post points out) it's a 4 yr old girl/boy.

    53. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by icebike · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be more efficient to hire competent people in your school district that know how to put the child on the right bus.

      In a word: NO.

      Come back after 1) you have children 2) you've actually DEALT with a school board, 3) you've ever managed to con, cajole, convince, or coerce any action by a school board on ANY subject what so ever.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    54. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by danlor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a parent with a mentally disabled child, I do not agree.

      Our children live in a world still devoid of danger and threat. They expect us, their elders to protect them from harm. That falls to the caretakers as well as us parents. Since we parents have little choice as far as where our children are housed everyday, we have to make other choices and decisions.

      I do not see this as an over reaction. I see it as well thought out, and keeping the idea of the child's privacy in mind. The solutions that are out there and available to us today are poor worst, expensive at best. Considering whats available off the shelf, this should be doable on your own.

      Does anyone here have any valuable advice other than satire and sensationalism? I could use it myself. I'm just as lost as the poster, and in desperate need.

    55. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Grammar Nazi Tanks you. Duck, incoming!

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    56. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Synn · · Score: 1

      I may be overreacting, but in the matter of a child's life it's far better to overreact than under react.

      No, it's not better, it's just as bad and can do just as much harm.

    57. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Talderas · · Score: 1

      And a careful reading also shows that it is a recurring problem.

      That is indicative of a far larger problem on the schools part.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    58. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where I grew up, the only Elementary school that had buses were the two "country" schools that covered the less densely populated areas on the outskirts of town. I walked to school every day, it was only a few blocks away, and I imagine if your kid went to one of the "city" schools, they all could have walked too. Of course this was in a town of 15,000, but I totally agree with you, city size should not matter. Elementary schools should be the ultimate local school.

    59. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      You really think that little hand held GPS is transmitting signals all the way back through deep space to the GPS satellite !

      You really think that little GPS satellite is in deep space !

      Yeah, we all say stupid stuff, me especially. I apologized for my ignorance, get over it. I figured if the guy wanted to monitor his kid through it on the web, it would have to send back some sort of signal. Your post was very informative and helpful.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    60. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that you didn't see "free money" in this? A good lawyer could have gotten you a million dollar settlement easy.

    61. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by raju1kabir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a parent with a mentally disabled child, I do not agree.

      As a parent with a mentally disabled child, you are talking about a situation that is more challenging and complex than the situation the rest of us are discussing. Apples and oranges.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    62. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by spydabyte · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this isn't realistic. Exspecially with our current concern with education (none), I doubt this will happen anytime soon. This scheme would be amazing for more than just the warehouse problem, including the return to creativity. If you follow some great minds out there, maybe you can find a movement towards better education and help out your neighborhood or local town, which would help us all.

    63. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Or a five or six year old child. I would assume that the child was in kindergarten or first grade since the poster implied the the child just started school.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    64. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can see the fnords. Seriously, there's a lot of FUD going around out there. If you want to be able to track of your young child with GPS, that's fine. But don't let it substitute for your kid being responsible for giving you a call later on to let you know what they're up to when they aren't following the usual plan. Remember, unless you're implanting the tracking device, it's not very reliable. So don't let GPS be a cure to some over zealous concern.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    65. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by coogan · · Score: 1

      I have to agree here. Having battled for years to even have a child, I too went through this paranoid phase, trying to find a highly technical solution to a really simple problem. I settled for teaching my three year old both our cellular numbers as well as her home address which she can rattle off perfectly along with the definitions of who to speak to since strictly speaking she shouldn't be talking to strangers. Now at five years of age she unfortunately can quite successfully use a phone to dial more than just those two numbers!!!

    66. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But now the evil pediatritions know your kids name!

    67. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by trum4n · · Score: 1

      my guess this girl is under 10. thus is still in the age group you can track with out "ruining their lives" never expect a 10 year old to be responsible, expect them to be 10.

    68. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Captain+Hook · · Score: 2, Funny

      one of the clients i work for is a bettered womens advocacy group and shelter

      The cheek of it, women trying to better themselves and then getting shelter as well.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    69. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so I agree you are going over board a bit, but that said my son was lost for a few hrs and it gave me nightmares for weeks after. I know verizon had a cell for kids that alowed you to track em in real time it also would let you keep intouch. I would aproch this form a nother point of view MAKE THE SCHOOL PAY! I would get a lawyer and other parents and make it so expensive that the school takes care of the problem.

    70. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      ... and you wonder why your mom hasn't called you in 20 years, huh? :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    71. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dawich · · Score: 2, Informative

      A student I know has an autism spectrum disorder, and is known for running away. He has a white wristwatch that can't be removed without tools, or a big cutter, that does provide GPS data. I don't know what the backend looks like, webpage, cellphone, etc., but his parents and caregivers are much relieved. So, something exists.

    72. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by DrLang21 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think we just have not learned to comprehend statistics. Every high school education should take a fair chunk of time to dive into statistics, enough to understand a few key points. Statistical methods that use too many subjective parameters are bunk, and so are their results. The impact of false positives on accuracy. Correlation and causal relationships. Just to name a few.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    73. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I do agree but then we need to add sidewalks to the cost which is also a good thing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    74. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by _Swank · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only one of the two solves the original problem; the technology-based tracking system is useless in ensuring the kid gets on the right bus, while the index card system should generally work.

    75. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well, 1:1000000 odds are really small. Unless that one is you or your relative/friend/etc.

    76. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      Unless the tracking device is subdermal, it's probably long gone when you try to find said child.

    77. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by CorporateSuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But I agree with the parent: get some perspective on things by waiting for a bit before subjecting your daughter to Big-Brother-like monitoring.

      That's ridiculous. If you're not Big-Brother-like monitoring your kid, you're not a parent. Kids below middle-school age have no privacy. There is no reason for a 8 year old to be anywhere but where their parent thinks they should be. This thing may be an issue for kids over the age of 12, but when they're still developmental grubs, advocating their rights to privacy is ignorance and dangerous for the child's development. The one who has lost perspective is the one who thinks that children are fully-cogent, underaged adults.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    78. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rahlquist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here I fixed this for you.....

      Not paranoid enough. Your index card system relies on teachers, teachers aides, drivers and their ability to read -- the original poster wants to rely on nothing but technology.

      --
      Sick of stupidity? http://www.patentlystupid.com
    79. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sabs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except when it comes to missing children.

      With missing children, you have to find them in the first 4 hours or so, or the chances of finding them alive plummets.

      This is why the invented brown alerts.
      When it comes to missing children, APB now, wonder why later.

    80. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ubercam · · Score: 1

      You'd think it's that easy to just have your kid remember which bus they're supposed to be on...

      This exact same thing happened to me very early in grade school, I think in Grade 1 or maybe even Kindergarten.

      First day of school, end of the day. The school bus made 2 runs, one for one neighbourhood and one for the other. The kids going to the second neighbourhood (where I lived) just played in the school yard until the bus came back empty. I was told by the supervising teacher that I was on the first bus, so I get on and I don't see anybody who I knew lived in my neighbourhood. I told the bus driver and she looked at her list and told me that I'm in the right spot. As the last few people were getting off I was really scared and went to the bus driver who asked me why I hadn't gotten off yet, and I told her that I don't live here and I don't know where I am. She asked where I lived and told me not to worry because she's going straight back to school to pick those kids up. The next day the teacher was there with the list again, and made me get on the bus again. Same thing happened. On the third day, she practically dragged me to the bus, but I was crying and telling her that I want to go on the second bus and then I think the driver told her what's going on and she was like, oh, fine then run along and play with your friends.

      Moral of the story: Maybe this guy's daughter was in the same situation as me. Maybe she knew something was wrong, but no one would listen. People have a tendency to listen to an authoritative figure. Teacher said I'm supposed to be on this bus, but I have a feeling that something's wrong because no one who gets off at my stop is actually on the bus... but teacher said, so...

    81. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My guess is that she's 5 or 6, since the poster mentions that it only took 2 days for the school to lose his kid. By age 10, it's fair to demand that your child phone home or leave a note. It's also only fair to expect that they'll forget. Kids don't often learn responsibility if there isn't a combination of a carrot and a stick (I'm not suggesting beating your child with a stick mind you).

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    82. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope that driver didn't work a single day driving buses after that. Did you press child endangerment charges? Tell the school?

    83. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

      He knows his daughter better than we all do.

      Unless this girl is the sort of kid who easily gets lost due to some medical issue, knowing her personally is quite irrelevant to whether she needs to be tracked via GPS.

      For kids who are normal, this sort of thing best viewed as a statistical problem: Of the thousands of children a school has to deal with, only a very small percentage of them will encounter such issues and then only very rarely. Attaching a GPS to this girl is ultimately a brilliant technical solution to a statistically insignificant problem.

      OP is right. It's all just paranoia.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    84. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by hxftw · · Score: 1

      They were hoping he'd run away out of their basement. Why waste minutes on a phone call when you can yell down the stairs?

      --
      Just because an idea is popular doesn't make it right.
    85. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I rest my case.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    86. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      This thing may be an issue for kids over the age of 12, but when they're still developmental grubs, advocating their rights to privacy is ignorance and dangerous for the child's development. The one who has lost perspective is the one who thinks that children are fully-cogent, underaged adults.

      Don't forget about the one who thinks only "fully-cogent ... adults" deserve any rights. He's lost quite a bit of perspective too.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    87. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. Here's an idea.

      Next time you go to the mall with the family, teach your daughter to talk to strangers.
      What? No way! Strangers are BAD. BAD EVIL people who want to randomly inject her with drugs so she'll become an addict and a regular client.

      Next time you go to the mall with the family, teach your daughter to talk to the right strangers. Mall clerks at security booths. Other parents. Security guards. Bus drivers. If you can teach your daughter to become street smart, she will be able to take care of herself when you're not around. She'll be safe even if you are unable to access your handheld, or the internet is down, or the power goes out...

    88. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      In my area, the public schools are completely overrun, mismanaged, and underfunded....badly.

      Underfunding of schools is ALWAYS trotted out as the problem. I've never heard what FULLY FUNDED is though? Ever.

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    89. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently closing down smaller schools to build bigger ones costs money too. My province (BC, Canada) tried that. My conclusion is, any change costs money.

      We now ship our children via busses, as well. Sometimes it takes ~2 hours to arrive at school, depending on your location. We could've saved money by not shutting down many of the schools, since now we're bussing tens of thousands of extra kids for hours every day.

    90. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously though for every time that happens thousands of times it doesn't.

    91. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Another ultra low tech strategy that worked well at various times in my youth, and currently works well for me as a parent, is "buy a house two blocks from school". It is of course uphill both ways in the snow, but, at least its a short walk.

      In my city, even if you lived two blocks from school, the district would probably force them to bus to a school 15 miles away.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    92. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by RKThoadan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you are going to track it then you are correct in that it does need to send a signal, it's just that the signal doesn't go back via the GPS satellite. It does need to go out somehow though. In most cases it's probably going to be a cell phone operating on the cell network. Keep in mind many of the cell trackers aren't going to be using GPS, they are going to be tracking it based on cell towers, which I don't think is as accurate as GPS and is useless in the unlikely event that you get completely out of range. I'm sure there are other options out there as well.

    93. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      In my city, having enough money to install water slides (Yes, the big three story amusement park kind) doesn't count as fully funded. Having enough money to put in water slides still counts as 'badly underfunded' around here.

    94. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Linux/Open Source requirement is to get the Slashdot editors to post the story.

    95. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      With an elementary school per neighborhood you could also use the school as center for the neighborhood. The playground becomes a park on the weekend. The library can have weekend activities for the children. The parents could be more involved.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    96. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "But don't let it substitute for your kid being responsible for giving you a call later on to let you know what they're up to when they aren't following the usual plan."

      Hear hear!!

      Goodness...how did we EVER survive as a species before cell phones and GPS trackers??!?!

      When I was a kid, I roamed all over the neighborhood, and ones near us. When really young, I had to call home on a neighbor's phone every couple hours or so to check in. If both parents were working, I called Mom at work.

      Geez..with all these new 'needs' for tracking kids, and apparent law changes or whatever, I imagine my parents and most of my peers parents would be sued by the state these days for child negligence for how we were raised.

      And let's not forget we as kids weren't drugged by our parents like they are today. Amazing we learned in school and survived at all, truly.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    97. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by compro01 · · Score: 1

      20 minutes for 2 miles on a school bus doesn't sound too out of line to me. Remember that the bus likely has a bunch of stops in that 2 miles. When I was in grade school, the 12 mile bus ride took over an hour.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    98. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by TCM · · Score: 1

      They expect us, their elders to protect them from harm.

      I thought they expect to be taught to handle unknown situations, if they expect anything at all yet.

      Your situation is different, that's why it's apples and orange anyway as the guy above me said. Nevertheless, the paranoia in your post is alarming.

      keeping the idea of the child's privacy in mind.

      You can say that with a straight face after suggesting to track your kid with a GPS device?

      It kinda dawns on me why governments have it so easy to trample upon rights. The citizens are preconditioned!

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    99. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rpresser · · Score: 1

      AC stated that the stop at "Rachel's house" was the driver's LAST STOP.

    100. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by nomadic · · Score: 1

      then it makes perfect sense to focus all your energies on making sure it doesn't happen to you.

      Wow, strawman. ALL your energies? Putting a GPS tracker on your kid really doesn't require THAT much energy, you know.

    101. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sukotto · · Score: 1

      Until someone hacks into that system ... then that person will know the OP's daughter very well too.

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    102. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The idiom "bold-faced lie" also exists you pretentious twat 2. I dunno, some days I'd kill to go 2 miles in under 20 minutes

    103. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 0, Troll

      Cue jokes about liking women the same way you like your fish...

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    104. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rpresser · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you're going to redefine "the original problem" at will, then you can make any claim and sit back with a self-satisfied air.

      "What the original poster really needs is a way of getting rid of this troublesome child before his life is ruined. Just ring: three-six-two-four-three-six, hey.

    105. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      So you have the GPS tracking you wanted, plus your child has a cellphone so you can reach them if they're indoors and GPS isn't working so hot, AND you have the added feature you didn't even know you wanted: a text message the instant your child leaves a designated area.

      Yeah, but... does it run Linux?

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    106. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bullshit. I knew my address AND my phone number from kindergarten, it's no harder than memorizing your own birthday.

      Teaching the (normal non-disabled) kid how to deal with REALITY is protecting them. Failing to teach them to memorize their phone number and address and how to deal with getting lost and just slapping a GPS on them is failing as a parent.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    107. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As a parent with a mentally disabled child, I do not agree. Our children live in a world still devoid of danger and threat. "

      I wouldn't imagine this would be that much of a problem with your type of special child. I mean, since they are in special schools, with teachers that know about their problems, along with what I'd have to imagine is a great deal SMALLER school population, that they'd be watched much more closely than a normal kid in a big public school.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    108. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he doesn't.

    109. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      A hundred times, THIS.

      I got on the wrong bus once because they lined up in a different order and I wasn't paying attention. "Um...Jeff doesn't ride my bus." After a brief moment of panic, Jeff and I figured I may as well go over to his house. When I got there, I called home and mom was so relieved that she didn't get mad at all. So I got to play at Jeff's house that afternoon and it was a really cool adventure. And I never [accidentally] got on the wrong bus again. :)

      And what would my mom have done if she'd had a GPS tracker on me? Jump in her car and chase the bus all over the valley? Talk about scarred for life. "Hey, isn't that your mom chasing us?" Even the best case scenario is pretty damaging. It would have taught me that, if I mess up, all I have to do is sit quietly until someone comes to rescue me.

    110. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No, you need to use a tattoo. A marker is too prone to smudging.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    111. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by psychodelicacy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's morally different, perhaps, but not in effect. The school accidentally places the child on the wrong bus; the child ends up who-knows-where without a parent at the other end to collect him/her. The child ends up unattended even though that was never the intention.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    112. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Migo is made to use Verizon's optional Chaperon service that lets parents track the phone in real time on their handset or PC.

      Does it also help them misspell words?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    113. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Atzanteol · · Score: 1
      No way man. He needs to get her an electronic leash *now*! And then he needs to hire himself a PI to follow his daughter. Then a second to follow the first. And a third to follow the second! Then he tells the first that the second is tailing him, and tells the second that the third is tailing him, and tells the third that the first is tailing him. Now they all know they're being watched.

      Then he needs to do random "checkups" on all three PIs and his daughter. Just to keep things in check.

      Otherwise she stands to learn how to fend for herself and we just can't have that. She's gotta know that wherever she goes and whatever she does that daddy is there watching like a creepy guy from a "B" movie.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    114. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      (I'm not suggesting beating your child with a stick mind you).

      So, it's OK to pelt them with carrots?

    115. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the one who thinks only "fully-cogent ... adults" deserve any rights. He's lost quite a bit of perspective too.

      Children have less of certain rights than an adult, but more of others. They do not have the right of complete freedom of movement without monitoring. Are you seriously arguing that a 6 year old has the right to go somewhere without the knowledge of their parents?

    116. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Chelloveck · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't mean to be a flame, because as a fellow parent (of toddlers, no less) I understand that it can be an extremely stressful and fear-inducing thing to lose track of your child. But I agree with the parent: get some perspective on things by waiting for a bit before subjecting your daughter to Big-Brother-like monitoring.

      As another parent, I agree with the above. In fact, I've been in a similar situation. When one of my boys was in kindergarten or first grade, he got on the right bus but didn't get off at his stop. He ended up riding the whole route and back to the bus depot. After a few semi-panicky calls around the school district we tracked him down and retrieved him.

      But this isn't a new problem. It's been around as long a school buses have been. The good news is that kids, even kindergartners, learn within a week or so which is the right bus, and where the right stop is. It's a transient issue.

      Teach your child what to do when lost. Stick a note with your phone number in her jacket or backpack or whatever she carries daily. Teach her to ask for help when she needs it. This will help her in practically every "lost child" situation, short of deliberate abduction.

      If you're really worried then yeah, you can get trackers. Cell phone providers usually offer this service, and there are some companies providing non-phone tracking devices. Even if you're a "tin-foil-hat wearing engineer" I'd say one of the services is the way to go. Get it, use it for a couple years until your daughter is old enough to trust on her own, and get rid of it.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    117. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by psychodelicacy · · Score: 1

      We don't know how old the child is - if she's quite young, she doesn't need to be "abnormal" in order to need competent adults to get her where she's going. When I was a young schoolkid, getting on the bus was always hugely stressful - I lose count of the number of times I was put on the wrong bus, dropped off at the wrong stop, whatever. It can be quite traumatic for a young kid to feel lost, so some way for parents to be able to get to them quickly if they are lost is a good thing, in my view.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    118. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only situation where a kid could be confused is when you have the normal bus broken down AND it's a substitute driver, but those are rare events and the school should be able to communicate the bus changes over the PA."
      .
      I agree with you until this part of your post. The PA is the worst possible choice for handling this situation. You may as well post a notice on the swingset in the playground. Not every kid affected is going to get the message.
      .
      In such a rare event, you assign a PERSON to make sure this happens safely, and correctly. It doesn't matter whether it is the principle, a teacher, the librarian, the lunchroom lady, or the freakin' janitor.

    119. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      I don't believe you. Name this school that has "several thousand students".

    120. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by badran · · Score: 0

      Or do it the Geeky way.

      1. Get a new nokia with the S60 platform. Make sure the phone has a GPS unit.
      2. Install Python on it.
      3. Write a simple Python app that will upload the current location to an ftp site with the current time-stamp. To save some mili watts, do this every 10 minutes. Make sure the app is started with the phone. I think you can also control the app via sms messages or if you want to you can also install a Apache and PHP on the thing and control it through a webinterface.
      4. Write a simple php script that will read the timestamped files with the GPS coordinates, and plot on a Gmap mashup. Be sure to lock this on a secure page on your site or something. I am sure you dont want to make this info public.
      5. Be sure to top up the phone battery every couple of days.

      Note: If you can just create some sort of enclosure for the phone, and do not let your kid use it. Just make sure it is on them all the time.

    121. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English Mother%^#%er! Do you speak it?!

    122. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by YourExperiment · · Score: 4, Funny

      Get her a Firefly or similar device.

      I know he's concerned about his daughter, but getting an entire starship to transport her to and from school just seems like overkill.

    123. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate to get a closed source one then find out that it was hacked by a child slave harvesting organization where they just sweep around and pick up all the tracked kids.

      Like GIJoe says, knowing is half the battle.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    124. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      All of the children have tags attached to their backpacks. She had hers. They decided to change the numbers and not tell anyone. Some alert individuals caught the change of numbers in the morning when the buses arrived to pick up and changed the numbers themselves. Since my daughter was dropped off by me, because we were running 5 minutes late, she didn't get that benefit. So, you see, that is part of my concern. A district with a normal total population of 3000, can't keep lines of communication open for three days when they only have to deal with a population a small fraction of that.

    125. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, it is bald-faced lie. Bald is a synonym of bare.

    126. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I did exactly what you suggest - bought my daughter a cell phone. When she was in Kindergarten she was let off at the wrong stop and was lost for an hour or so. It was pretty intense hour. The bus company shifts drivers around quite a bit and as a consequence, drivers often have no idea where particular kids get off or even exactly where the stops are.

      The cool thing is, she plays with her phone quite a bit and it's now one of her favorite "toys". She takes photos and movies with it, sends text messages to me and to her mom, and places the occasional phone call to her grandmother.

      -ec

    127. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Goodness...how did we EVER survive as a species before cell phones and GPS trackers??!?!

      Much higher birth rates.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    128. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by hmar · · Score: 1

      Current thinking is that the whole name badge thing was a bad idea, because a predator can use the childs name to feign fmiliarity.

    129. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      While the Mcanns child was a couple of years younger than the poster's, It still always amazes me that people think it is horrific child abuse to leave a child alone in their own home, but it is just fine if they are out in public.

    130. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by _Swank · · Score: 1

      Did I redefine "the original problem"? I was under the impression that the root cause of this guy wanting to know where his child was, was that they got on the wrong bus. He's asking for a solution to know where his kid is if it happens again (and under other circumstances too). However, this doesn't help in solving the 'recurring' problem of kids getting on the wrong bus.

    131. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by psychodelicacy · · Score: 1

      The kid is five years old! You want to pack her off to school every morning with a rifle in her backpack? Sure, I agree that teaching your kids to stand up for themselves is imperative, but it's just not possible to make a child that young totally self-sufficient in unexpected situations.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    132. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "you're assuming the guy in the article is honestly trying to track his daughter."

      He should go old school. The basement was good enough for Josef Fritzl!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    133. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by celtic_hackr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      A very valid point, but my wife used to work at one of those shelters. Most of those women are dumber than dirt, because they keep going back for more and some of them just use those shelters as a vacation to get away from it all when it gets too bad and also to get a bunch of freebies. Not that I mean to blame the women. Those guys, and yes even some women who are abusers,really need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent that the law can provide. But sadly, this is one of the most under-reported crimes in America, and the victims are among the least protected. Just look at that ex-cop, and how he's gotten away with killing two, or at least until now. Little bit late now that the damage is done.
      But this is all kind of OT.

    134. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd like to know the age too.

      My son was going to preschool (LD classes) at the age of 3 1/2. There's no way he could take care of himself if he was put on the wrong bus, as the OP noted. Everyone is so busy screaming "overprotective parent!" that they're missing the point. The school admits they screw up the bus loading all the time. I'd sure as hell want this as well, especially if the school is stupid enough to admit that they're losing kids.

    135. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      So when the index card system doesn't work, how do you find the child?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    136. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's wrong with that? My parents used to leave me in the car parked outside the bar while they went out for a night of drinking, and other than wasting all my time on slashdot, I turned out pretty much ok! Other tricks they pulled: put the kids in Coach while they flew First Class, and on trips left the kids in a motel room while they went out for the evening, then yelled at the kids because they told the motel clerk they didn't know where their parents were. But guess what... kids are pretty good at taking care of themselves.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    137. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

      http://catb.org/jargon/html/Y/YHBT.html ...and nope, I'd not seen that particular troll before. I'm not sure how, but there you go. I learned two new things today.

    138. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dzfoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> Goodness...how did we EVER survive as a species before cell phones and GPS trackers??!?!

      It was a different time; kidnappers and paedophiles were not invented until the 1990s, along with terrorists and weapons of mass destruction. It's the interwebs I tells ya.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    139. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by eln · · Score: 1

      At my kids' elementary school, each bus has a picture of a different animal taped to the window. The kids know what animal their bus has on it (for the first couple of weeks, the kids have the animal pinned to their shirt as well). If the bus breaks down, you just put the animal picture in the replacement bus. Much easier, and kids seem to have an easier time remembering they're on the "bee bus" rather than on bus #3542.

    140. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by hmar · · Score: 1

      None of your advice will protect the child while she is young enough to be placed on the wrong bus. Are you under the impression that a 5 year old should carry a gun? Or that any amount of training could make her 3 feet taller and able to defend herself against a grown man? Lowjacking your kid may be a bit of an over-reaction, but trying to turn a 5 year old into Rambo is plain moronic.

    141. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a parent of apples and oranges, i can agree that none of you understand the complex situation in which i find myself in.

    142. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Calling up the school and screaming at them usually works for me... eventually.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    143. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      That only (barely) meets objective 1, and fails to meet objectives 2-6. This solution will probably not be considered. (Ignoring that as a preventive measure it is probably more effective than any of the after-the-fact solutions he is looking for. Also ignoring that it's not a solution he can implement.)

    144. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my parents did drug me on school days. I certainly don't hold it against them. They were doing what all of the school officials, doctors, and politicians were saying was in my best interest. Indeed, the alternative was that I would have at a minimum been required to repeat Kindergarten and would probably have failed miserably in school. Schools today are still rarely equipped to keep students with ADD properly stimulated and engaged. When do try to address the issue, it usually falls into the special education category that lumps them in with the slow learning students, which really just aggravates the problem. Due to this poor setup, I believe that I could not have made it where I am today without the assistance of amphetamines, and I would never change the past on that choice. I am however paying a small price in terms of what I believe were slight permanent alterations of my autonomic system as a result. To new parents today, if you can afford it, I would highly suggest looking into schools that are fast paced enough to keep your kids stimulated and interested. ADD is aggravated by a lack of stimulation, not by an excess of it (which is why amphetamines work to treat it).

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    145. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting beating your child with a stick

      By process of elimination I guess you are suggesting to beat the child with a carrot then. I mean, how many kids do you know that think a carrot is any kind of reward? Most kids I've seen, on the other hand, love to pick up and play with sticks.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    146. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sabs · · Score: 1

      You do realize his daughter is 5 years old?
      You're going to send a 5 year old to school with a handgun?
      Really?

      martial Arts? My son is 7 and in martial arts, and I could easily overpower him and drag him away I after all weight 4+ times what he does and I'm twice as tall.

    147. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in 1963 I got on the wrong bus, INTENTIONALLY, so that I could go home and visit with a newly found friend. About 10 minutes into the ride, I realized I might be in trouble for doing so, but hey, to late now. When we got to Danny's house, his mother made me CALL HOME IMMEDIATELY.

      No big deal, really.

      I simply can't relate to an overly upset parent who loses contact with his kid for an hour or so. What are you going to do when the kid cuts school, and disappears for the entire day? Lock the kid in a closet til he/she reaches age 30?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    148. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by blueskies · · Score: 1

      I don't think 24-7 tracking precludes the ability to teach his daughter what to do... defense in depth and all...

    149. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kidnapped? The girl's probably dead... See this video.

    150. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by _Swank · · Score: 2, Funny

      marco polo?

    151. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the biggest problem here is that the child had no friends who noticed he disappeared. The buddy system tends to work pretty well, so maybe the parent should focus their energies on helping the child forge stronger friendships, not outfitting her with Big Parent gear.

    152. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Migo is made to use Verizon's optional Chaperon service that..."

      They retired the migo a few years ago. The "Chaperone Child" feature however is still very much alive and I'll wager on a lot more phones than you realize. Just go to vzw.com/phones and choose "More options" from the lower left corner. Then choose "Chaperone Child"

      I would go so far as to wager that more than half the people who bought vzw phones in the last two years have a "Chaperone Child" phone.

    153. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by lgw · · Score: 1

      Stay with your kid at the bus stop the first few days of the school year and make sure she gets on the right bus. If you care about your chldren, this is the answer. Don't rely on a government bearucracy: they never get it right the first few times.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    154. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 1

      It still always amazes me that people think it is horrific child abuse to leave a child alone in their own home, but it is just fine if they are out in public.

      First of all it wasn't in their own home. It was in an unlocked apartment in a foreign country that they were on vacation in without any supervision for the kids at all.

    155. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Your correct. I miss spoke. It has just under a thousand students. Not several thousands. Still way too many. I believed the parent that complained that there where over two thousand students. I should have known better.
      Still a child warehouse but you are correct that it is currently less than a thousand. Next year I bet it will be over a thousand.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    156. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by darrylo · · Score: 1

      While I think the OP is overreacting horribly ("helicopter parent"???), they do make cell phones designed for young children (in the US, at least). There's a button to press for mommy, and a different button to press for daddy. There are a few more buttons, IIRC, but those are the important, easy-to-use ones. I don't think there's a GPS, but the OP can contact the police, and the police can act "appropriately" upon the cell phone triangulation data.

    157. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Child predators are almost a myth, and certainly not a meaninful risk. Children are abducted by relatives, especially the losers in custody battles. Being abducted by a stranger is about as likely as being struck by lighting (unless you live in Florida, then lightning is the bigger risk).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    158. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      I remember a time when I was in school and this happened....the kid got on the wrong bus.....when the bus got the the last stop the driver made everyone get off so he could take the bus back to the yard. If it hadn't been for the fact that one of the parents at this "last stop" asked this young girl looked so confused and then help to find her parent who knows know this would have turned out. In that situation how would "screaming at" the school help? The poor person you are screaming at likly has JUST as little idea what happened as you do and finding the kid is what takes precedence at that point...yelling is good for getting an apology and perhaps some methodology changes, but not at finding the kid.

    159. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a former verizon wireless sales rep I can easily attest to this fact. When vzw released their first 'Chaperone' phone, the Migo, most of the creeps weren't even trying to pretend they were for children.

      You could fit a standard LG extended battery in the Migo, but you wouldn't be able to fit the case back on. I actually had someone tell me that they didn't care, they'd just duct tape it to stay and place and throw it in the back of his wife's truck.

      I started refusing to sell the Migos we had unless they would bring in the child so I could teach them how to use the phone.

    160. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Bravo! That is precisely the same age-old technique that my parents employed (as well as millions before them). I remember particularly one incident when my 4 year old sister got lost when we entered a Disney World park back in the 70s: We were going through the turnstiles and she just happen to hang on to the bottom of some other lady's dress thinking it was my mom. Within mere minutes she was out of sight and my parents were freaking out.

      About 30 minutes later they found her at the security guard's office. It turns out that right after she realize the skirt she grabbed didn't belong to my mom, she panicked, started crying and was taken by the lady to one of the guards. She proceeded to tell them (in broken English, for it is our second language) my father's name and the hotel we were staying at (at the Disney resort). This because for the past few days my parents had made us memorize the information and explained how we should find a "non-stranger" (e.g. a uniformed individual, security guard, or lady with children, etc.) and tell them "help, I'm lost".

      A few days later, I got lost at the park. Being seven years old, I did what I was told to do: find a security guard, say "help, I'm lost", and tell them my father's name and hotel. My parents eventually noticed I was missing, and went to the security office to fetch me. No GPS, no real-time tracking.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    161. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Don't apply symptomatic solutions. Cure the disease.

      Call your school board member and ask why getting students on the right buses isn't a priority.

      There ought to be a basic set of standard expectations that the school district claims they will meet. Things like "Your child will not get killed while in our custody (*excepting acts of God).", "We will not employ convicted child molestors on school grounds while children are present." and "We will only release your child into the custody of duly authorized persons."

      Figure out what that list is, then make sure they're meeting expectations.

      Also, don't complain too much when they'd like some tax dollars to do this.

    162. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by vlm · · Score: 1

      For kids who are normal, this sort of thing best viewed as a statistical problem: Of the thousands of children a school has to deal with, only a very small percentage of them will encounter such issues and then only very rarely. Attaching a GPS to this girl is ultimately a brilliant technical solution to a statistically insignificant problem.

      The correct statistical analysis is how does the failure rate of the school bus system as a whole, compare to the combined failure rate of the GPS RX, the GPS battery, the phone, the phone battery, the interconnecting gadget and its cables, and the headend or whatever? Or if you just buy an off the shelf solution, what is the failure rate of the device, battery, cell service, GPS reception, and the likelihood of the kid simply losing the thing or another kid stealing it for the heck of it?

      I would think it would be required to work, perhaps, once a lifetime, and the tracking gear would fail approximately 99/100th of the time. So, most likely, it would be useless.

      Oddly enough, no one has suggested that given the cost of this device and the reoccurring costs, the cheapest and most resourceful and reliable solution is to pool the resources of a couple parents to hire a retired granny that lives across the street and has a clean background check, and have granny physically verify each kid gets on the correct bus for a small fee. Sort of a protection racket. I guess if the parents filed the correct paperwork w/ the school (possibly with help of lawyers?) there is nothing the school could do to stop the granny from being a "privately hired teacher's aide" or get granny a chauffeurs license with child endorsement or whatever your locality requires and have her drive the kids across the street to her house, or something, just to make it technically legal for her to help.

      Or since tiered products are all the rage for mobile phone, internet access, and who knows what in the future, maybe parents could pay more for "guaranteed" delivery vs "best effort" delivery of their kids?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    163. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MrEd · · Score: 1

      Next post on Ask Slashdot: Evading a Child Locating System! "My dad is tracking me with a subcutaneous GPS chip. How can I block it?"

      --

      Wah!

    164. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      What do you do if you your phone number ever changes?

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    165. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1. The idiom "bold-faced lie" also exists you pretentious twat

      You are incorrect: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_the_correct_term_'bold_face_lie'_or_'bald_faced_lie'_or_another_variation

    166. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by HiThere · · Score: 1

      So it means lying without wearing a beard?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    167. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by vlm · · Score: 1

      Another ultra low tech strategy that worked well at various times in my youth, and currently works well for me as a parent, is "buy a house two blocks from school".

      In my city, even if you lived two blocks from school, the district would probably force them to bus to a school 15 miles away.

      Original suggestion still stands, especially including that situation. Find a better place to live.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    168. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      As a parent with a mentally disabled child

      Your situation is different. Possibly greatly different, depending on the degree of disability. Your child, when he/she grows up, may still need assistance with life's regular challenges.

      Our children live in a world still devoid of danger and threat. They expect us, their elders to protect them from harm.

      Indeed, we do shield them from the dangers and threats of the world, to the extent that we can.
      But when they grow up, will they have learned to protect the next generation, if we have prevented them learning how to protect themselves? They need lessons in common sense responses to unexpected situations, as much as protection from the nastiness of the world. Such lessons should lead progressively to self-reliance, as the child grows up. As they say: "you can't child-proof the world, but you might world-proof the child". We look out for our children, as much as we reasonably can, but we try to mentally equip them to look out for themselves also, because we can't always be at hand.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    169. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by EW87 · · Score: 0

      I have this revolutionary idea. I think celtic_hackr should try it, it's a new open source application called "Go to the school and pickup your goddamn child"

    170. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the clients i work for is a bettered womens advocacy group and shelter. they have horror stories all the time of guys who do the same thing to their wives, ex wives girlfriends etc.

      And I've found that people who work for, or are involved with, such agencies have an extreme level of paranoia and tend to assume that mean are evil and will hurt you. Which is understandable for the clients, but I would have hoped for a more sane and rational thought process on the part of the workers.
      What they never bother to mention is that women are, in general, much worse when it comes to stalking men, but since men are seen as "pussies" they generally are laughed at or ignored.

      But to answer the question of the poster, yes several companies offer exactly such a service. You will probably butt heads with the school administration over cellphone access however, and chances are it'll sit in a teacher's desk all day, even if you have it locked down to 911 access only.

    171. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Um, my dog, yeah, dog, she gets loose a lot and I wonder if there's some kind of tracking device she can carry that I can track using linux based tools.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    172. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Ezrymyrh · · Score: 1

      Duh-boy, cue debates on how much surveillance for your child is really necessary.

      I'd say just let him be a parent and decide what's necessary. He knows his daughter better than we all do.

      jenny mccarthy knows her son better too... Does that mean by not getting him vaccinated it is a good thing?

      --
      The love of good Whiskey,Woman,Weed is all i need.
    173. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Cheap way: have the tattooist cross out the old number and write the new one. Expensive way: laser tattoo removal, followed by another tattoo. Either way builds character.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    174. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by vlm · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: Maybe this guy's daughter was in the same situation as me. Maybe she knew something was wrong, but no one would listen. People have a tendency to listen to an authoritative figure.

      Indoctrinating that is the number one purpose of public schooling. Good luck with a solution to the problem that involves opposing that.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    175. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      Too soon, man! That is SO not funny.
      (I hate myself for chuckling at it.)

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    176. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Were your parents too retarded to find a baby/house sitter or a relative to watch you guys? Seems like your parents were just trying to get away from you but for some reason wanted to pretend that they actually cared about you guys and thus took you along on the trip, but left you alone everywhere.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    177. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're assuming the guy in the article is honestly trying to track his daughter.

      You're assuming its a guy. It could be a girl who wants to see what her boyfriend is up to.

      Another application of this has to be for the elderly or mentally ill. My grandfather is suffering from the early stages of damentia, several times i've taken him shopping and lost him. I don't like to follow him the whole time like he's some child and I like to give him as much independence as possible. Unfortunately we've lost him many times when shopping and recently when taking a flight to go on holiday he went to the toilet and then couldn't remember where he was sat. I've been thinking about possible ways to build a tracker for him so that if he does get in trouble we can find him.

    178. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed so hard at that i almost passed out!

      I...had...to...eat...my own fingers

    179. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by xZoomerZx · · Score: 1

      Jesus H Christ on a crutch! You want to lojack your kid? You are part of the problem instead of the solution. If your kid is so helpless she cant find her bus, it means either she rides the short bus or you wasted her first five years by failing as a parent to train her properly. 1.Teach your kid how to get on the right bus, and how deal with getting lost. 2.Send your kid to a school that is competent. If you can afford a high tech solution you can afford homeschooling or private school. 3.See #1. A gadgets battery can die, a name tag can come unpinned, school officials will make mistakes, but your kids brain cant fall out, shut off, or stop working. And yes, I speak from experience. I have raised 7 to adulthood and working on 2 more, none of which got lost. And if your kid puts up enough resistance to being put on the wrong bus, the school will call you, at which time you get a free shot at giving the school an ass-chewing for not being smarter than the kid. (true story)

      --
      Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    180. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one would say it is a crazy idea to give an elementary school student a cell phone. They should not be in a situation requiring the use of one when away from an adult. All that will happen is that you will see a jump in use when the kid proceeds to lose it and someone realizes they can make free calls for a month or so. Frankly, distractions like these in a classroom environment are the last thing we need. Last I knew phones in school were confiscated anyway (that was 5 years ago or so). The current crop reaching college seems incapable of functioning without one and a useful tool has turned into a worse crutch than spell check or calculators ever were.

    181. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      I used to do that on purpose when I was in 1st grade because I was one of the first ones off the bus and I knew the whole ride was very nice out in the woods of Michigan. 'course then I was punished for it and I quit it.

    182. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Knowing my kid, we'll be able to find him urgently trying to talk to a statue.

    183. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Eil · · Score: 1

      Instead of jumping directly to an electronic device, teach her what to do if she gets lost... the same strategy that's been used successfully by parents for many, many years: find a "safe" adult (police officer, female adult with kids) and tell them that she's lost. If she's old enough to attend school, she's old enough to learn her phone number and address.

      It's sad that it took about 3-4 pages of scrolling to find the most reasonable response to this question.

      Any time I think to myself, "omg, I *must* have this new piece of technology in order to be safe/secure/entertained," I force myself to stop and think about what people did just a few years ago before the technology existed. In this specific case, the child certainly realized that she wasn't on the right bus pretty quickly. Even though it was only the first day, she should have noticed that the route was different and (even more obviously) all of the other kids were different than the first two days.

      To prevent this from happening again, the parent should underscore to his child the importance of recognizing when a situation isn't right and how to constructively fix it (i.e., go up to the bus driver and say, "hi, I'm on the wrong bus".) Throwing money and cell phones at the problem is simply misguided at best and at worse, it further reinforces the notion that mummy and daddy are always going to be there to protect you so that you never have to learn how to be independent on your own. The submitter left out a lot of crucial details, but I have to assume that his daughter was the one that got on the wrong bus in the first place. I did it once when I was in school. It's not really that big a deal. Once the bus driver realizes that the kid is on the wrong route, the bus driver radios the school, and the school calls the parents and informs them of the situation.

      Perhaps this is a symptom of a deeper problem with how children are being taught and raised. The whole "be afraid of strangers" mantra that most parents these days subscribe to is overblown and socially damaging. Perhaps even life-threatening in many cases. If you really want your kid to be safe, teach them about the world as it actually exists and how to deal with real problems. Giving them the "everyone is out to molest and kill you" treatment does a shitload more damage to them than a random encounter with a stranger is likely to.

    184. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Ezrymyrh · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Here's an idea.

      Next time you go to the mall with the family, teach your daughter to talk to strangers. What? No way! Strangers are BAD. BAD EVIL people who want to randomly inject her with drugs so she'll become an addict and a regular client.

      Next time you go to the mall with the family, teach your daughter to talk to the right strangers. Mall clerks at security booths. Other parents. Security guards. Bus drivers. If you can teach your daughter to become street smart, she will be able to take care of herself when you're not around. She'll be safe even if you are unable to access your handheld, or the internet is down, or the power goes out...

      Please MOD this up. I taught my 2 kids this and it does work very well.

      --
      The love of good Whiskey,Woman,Weed is all i need.
    185. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      I remember that in elementary school. Only it was just a scrap of construction paper and the bus driver put an identical colored piece of paper in the windshield. Of course, after a couple weeks the drivers stopped doing this. We were told to rely on this fancy new system called "numbers". We had to remember the number of the bus and get onto that bus at the end of the day. Really weird system, dunno if anyone else uses it.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    186. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Um, it's bad, but in this case, it's not as bad.

      A GPS tracker is hardly over-reacting. I actually broadcast my location on Google Latitude, and when my toddler is school-age, he'll get some sort of tracker, too. (I view getting lost a bigger danger than stranger abduction.) I don't think that being able to know the position of your family members is really a massive violation of privacy, and can actually be pretty damn cool.

      When a stage is reached where the child is actively trying to go "off the grid" for a bit, I'll support him - unstructured play time and self-structured social time are very important. But pre-school? Kindergarten? Up to 4th grade or so, I think it's projecting a lot to think that they'd even be bothered by being trackable.

    187. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ChefInnocent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know when I was in kindergarten (back in the 70's), I was daydreaming when my bus stop came up. When the bus driver said we were at the last stop, I explained I had missed my stop. Fortunately, he had to drive past most of the bus stops on the way back to the school yard. When my bus stop came up, I pointed out which one it was, and was let off.

      I'm curious why his daughter wouldn't have known she was on the wrong bus, and simply been driven back to the school where an administrator could call her parents. Once she knew she was "lost", she should have explained to the bus driver, who could then call into the school. The school should then call the parent(s) to let them know when they can pick her up from the campus.

      I'm not seeing why this should be a big deal unless both his daughter and the administrators needs special assistance.

    188. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was thinking. I never had this problem because our buses didn't have numbersâ"they actually said where they were going printed on the sides. I knew who else was on my bus because they lived near me so even if I got on the wrong bus somehow I'd be able to tell because the wrong people would be there. And my bus driver knew everyone's name (and their parents' names).

      My mind reels at the thought of a kindergartner in a large, urban school of thousands of kids.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    189. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was kidding. Bus safety is one of the few things the Beaverton School District is really good at. The only problem I've had is with the kid's mother not being there to pick her up from the kindergarten bus. I called the school, the very competent school secretary got on the radio with the bus driver within about 30 seconds, and I was told I could pick up my child back at the school in 15 minutes.

      The school staff actually do an admirable job of putting kids on the right bus, all things considered. Most of the problems are caused by drivers that simply don't give a shit, like the driver that left a kid sleeping in the back of the bus when he locked it up in the bus yard at night (regulations dictate they should sweep the bus first). Of course, if you were getting paid $10 and hour for a 20 hour week, you probably wouldn't give a shit either.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    190. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Screaming at them makes them care. Schools couldn't give less of a shit about the kids they're in charge of. Their only objective is to do enough to get rid of annoying parents. Thus, if you're an annoying parent, they'll help you to make you go away.

      Of course, if you start screaming about suing the school for losing your child, they'll jump to it. The only thing they're more afraid of than parents is lawyers.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    191. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are absurd!

      Kids, as well as teens and adults, NEED privacy. They also need to be protected, but that doesn't obviate the need for privacy.

      The problem is how to respect their need for privacy while sufficiently protecting them in an environment that's unconscionably dangerous. The best solution would be to make the environment safer, but that's a bit difficult for one individual to do. Work toward, yes, but be reasonable about what you expect.

      So you need to take reasonable measures to protect your children while still respecting their privacy. For someone under 12 a locator seems a quite reasonable method. It's not perfect, and won't defend against malice, but it's reasonable. Something like a remotely readable GPS system that's accessible by phone. I suspect that such things are available, but I'm not certain. WiFi trackers are used for tracking animals, and some are pretty small, but many locations are without live WiFi networks accessible to random passers-by. So a cell phone connection seems the right answer. This probably means that there isn't an open source solution, since the number of open source cell phones is miniscule. But it also means that there is probably a extant solution...if you look in the right place.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    192. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      His kid, his choice..

      You could easily extrapolate this same concept to your dog, car, wife...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    193. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      The poor person you are screaming at likly has JUST as little idea ...

      that poor person is the school, in every bit that you care. They are an employee, tasked with answering the number given to you, and bear responsbility as part of their JOB to tell you where your child is when you call and, well, want your child back.

      Yelling is very appropriate. In fact, "you lost my kid" is pretty much the bar for when you can or cannot yell at the school. (Your kid is failing math? don't yell. Your kid didn't come home from a field trip? Yell.)

    194. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the one who thinks only "fully-cogent ... adults" deserve any rights. He's lost quite a bit of perspective too.

      That's a strawman. Knowing where you children are at 1:30PM is NOT on the slippery slope.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    195. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Children have less of certain rights than an adult, but more of others.

      Technically, that's true, but it's true of prisoners as well (and for essentially the same reasons). I hope you aren't suggesting that those two categories balance each other out.

      They do not have the right of complete freedom of movement without monitoring. Are you seriously arguing that a 6 year old has the right to go somewhere without the knowledge of their parents?

      I am seriously arguing that a child's right to privacy shouldn't be dismissed offhand. In particular cases, sure, it's debatable. But to suggest, as the GP did, that "kids below middle-school age have no privacy" -- that there's no moral or ethical question whatsoever about turning anyone below age 12 into a 24x7 homing beacon, or indeed that "you're not a parent" unless you're taking such draconian measures -- is simply ignorant.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    196. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

      "Much higher birth rates."

      Oh please. The vast majority of kids today are not subjected to GPS tracking, and yet they survive. Birth rates are irrelevant here, as most of the things that threaten a child's survival cannot be solved via GPS tracking?

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    197. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by SirJorgelOfBorgel · · Score: 1

      Dang, I read about this a week ago waiting for an appointment, skimming through the paper they had lying around. It was an interview with the inventor, but for the life of me I can't remember what the watch was called. Be damned forgetful mind! It's a good solution though, and I think for young children as well ... what could possibly go wrong? Older children too even, but then you'd need to implement a system like the GPS being in the phone and you not being able to look at the location until you've tried calling at least twice (and not being answered).

    198. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually go even lower tech and get a tattoo on the kid.

      Property of XX YY.

      Please contact if lost at 555-1212.

      Remove after they turn 18. Works for me.

    199. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I gave my daughter a Firefly when she was in first grade for all of the reasons every has mentioned. They are incredibly easy to use. However, there is still one fatal flaw -- they have to be turned on.

      You may not think that's a problem but it was for my daughter. See, the school absolutely insists that all cell phones are turned off during the day. I'm not talking about "mute" or "vibrate" or anything. Off. And yes, they would actually do random checks to verify. I tried to tell them that you can restrict who calls the Firefly so it won't be randomly ringing during the day but it was no good. In the end, it was up to my daughter to remember to turn it on. She almost never did.

      This was a continuing problem until she hit her tweens. As soon as her friends had cell phones too and she discovered texting, then the problem solved itself. I got her a prepaid phone for texting along with a 200 message plan and she was off to the races. That phone was on the second the school bell rang.

      Of course, that just opened up another problem. Did you know that a tween girl can go through 200 texts the very first hour of the very first day that the package is activated? Ah well.

    200. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The school district loses my girlfriend's mentally disabled son at least once per year.

      They have some sub in some office somewhere who doesn't read his folder and they stick him on the General Population bus.

      He doesn't speak, doesn't know where to get off and the driver has no clue why there is still a kid at the end of the run...

    201. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Even simpler solution: Buses have numbers. Teach your child to identify each bus by its number, and find the appropriate one; it is doubtful that the bus number would change, and they usually go to the same pickup/dropoff point.

      If the child is too young to be able to identify numbers and letters (which again, I doubt) then it is the parents job to teach this.

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    202. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I am seriously arguing that a child's right to privacy shouldn't be dismissed offhand. In particular cases, sure, it's debatable.

      Sure it's debatable. The dismissal is coming mainly from the other side of the argument, by people who react to ANY attempt to even look after their kids with screams about nanny states and toughening up kids.

      Privacy here is too vague a subject to be useful. I wouldn't argue that a child has the right to be alone or with friends without parental interference. However, I do think adults are not intruding on this right when they always know where the child is geographically.

    203. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      It would solve the problem of being "that kid whose parents track her with a GPS device". She'd be the coolest kid in school.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    204. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odds of her being kidnapped by a stranger are significantly less than the odds of her dying in a car crash. We cannot defend against all threats, and there are many others which deserve more of this guy's attention.

    205. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      You seem to be operating under the assumption that the public school system has the ability to deal with kids with mental disorders. Everyone who isn't normal is just filed under "special education" which is basically a better way of saying "the class where everyone is taught exactly the same, but slower than normal... and grades don't matter as much" regardless of what mental problem they have.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    206. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up. While not "almost a myth", it's so statistically unlikely that a stranger is going to randomly abduct a child vs. them being abducted by someone they know, that "stranger danger" as a meme does little more than fuel tv ratings, product advertisements, and supply South Park episodes with plots.

    207. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by apocalypse2012 · · Score: 0

      Believe me, no parent who has ever had their child abducted, raped and murdered has ever thought their problem was statistically insignificant. When you are a parent, your don't care about statistics, because you don't play the numbers with your children. I want to know the answer to this mans question as well. And if there is a product that fits the criteria, I will be buying one, for the same reason I own guns. Even there the odds of me using one for self defense are statistic insignificant, the odds of me ever wishing I had had one to use are exactly 0. That is certainty with paying for. These are the only products I know of... I don't know how good any of them are... http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/realtime-gpstrackingsystem.html

    208. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "female adult with kids"

      Statistically more likely to harm a child than:

      A male adult with kids
      A male adult without kids
      A female adult without kids

      And they most commonly kill their own kids, then abuse (physically / sexually and emotionally) their own kids, then sexually abuse other children.

      But keep listening to the media demonize men.

    209. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by tftp · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of kids today are not subjected to GPS tracking, and yet they survive.

      My guess is that expectations are different. A modern parent "loses track" of his child for 5 minutes and already it's seen as a major international incident, a notch or two above North Korea testing their latest nuclear bomb. The statistic fully supports your statement; children are quite capable to survive on their own (as long as they are trained to cross roads correctly!) However parents don't look at statistics, they latch onto worst cases (that are statistically impossible) and let their fear loose.

      When I went to school (and it was not in this century) I just walked there and back, because the city that I lived at had schools everywhere, and no school buses were needed. This way nobody could "put" me on a wrong bus, or otherwise have any say in what I do outside of the school building. As matter of fact, my parents had no idea where I was (usually just around the neighborhood, if not at home, building random electronic stuff.) On the other hand, abductions of children (or adults, to that matter) were unheard of, and if a child wanders really far away from home he'd just talk to a police officer and everything would be OK. (Children were specifically taught, from earliest age, to seek police if they are lost, and police officers were not likely to draw a gun on you if you approach to ask something.)

      If my parents had any questions about where I was, they could always ask me later. They actually asked me, now and then, to start calling them if my schedule changes, but I never did that because I knew that sooner or later I'd be unable to call for a very benign reason and then they will be all jittery.

    210. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sexconker · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about?
      You've successfully reproduced.

      Unless it involved test tubes, a lab in your basement, and possibly some form of mechanical impregn-o-bot, you are not a geek.

    211. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS enabled? Hello - a cellphone can be geolocated based on the ping time to the nearest base stations. That method is getting good enough to be considered useful for 911 purposes, so I'm sure it's good enough for wife beaters anonymous. All you need is access.

    212. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Knara · · Score: 1

      I went to a very small class-sided kindergarten and on my first day still managed to get on the wrong bus (in around 1980-1981).

      If we go by the hysteria of the day, I was likely to be abducted by satanists and likely to be sacrified (or at least forced to play D&D, which would cost me my eternal soul).

      It's really not that big of a deal, routinely happens just about everywhere the first few days of class.

      I'm sure Stone Philips is on the case, though.

    213. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sexconker · · Score: 1

      When I was in 3rd grade a friend of mine said he was supposed to ride the bus with me today because his mom couldn't pick him up after school.

      I asked him if he knew where to get off, and he said his mom said to just follow me.

      So I get off and go about my regular business, friend in tow.

      His mom's not at the bus stop, nor is he anywhere near home.

      I walk on over to my babysitter's house for the afternoon, as usual, friend in tow.

      Babysitter called another friend's parents, who knew and called the parents of my tag-along friend.

      His mom ends up driving over to pick him up anyway.

      I don't know what the deal was with not being able to pick him up and then doing it anyway, but the basic instruction to follow me is what got him home.

    214. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      That's a strawman.

      Oh, now you have a problem with strawmen? You didn't seem to mind them when you wrote this: "The one who has lost perspective is the one who thinks that children are fully-cogent, underaged adults."

      You may recall that the person you were replying to never said children were "fully-cogent, underaged adults": that's a silly position you made up in order to argue against it, i.e. a strawman. He just said that subjecting children to remote monitoring is an overreaction.

      As for me, I admit that I exaggerated a little. I should've said:

      Don't forget about the one who thinks only "fully-cogent ... adults" deserve any privacy rights. He's lost quite a bit of perspective too.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    215. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by shmlco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A child is about a 1,000 times more likely to be killed by drowning in a neighbor's pool than abducted by a total stranger. 10,000 times more likely to be seriously injured or even killed playing school sports. And 100 times more likely to be struck by lightning.

      Parents need to stop watching CSI and Criminal Minds and Law & Order.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    216. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      The dismissal is coming mainly from the other side of the argument, by people who react to ANY attempt to even look after their kids with screams about nanny states and toughening up kids.

      Oh, bullshit. No one is objecting to "ANY attempt to even look after their kids"; what they're objecting to is constant remote GPS monitoring.

      Here's the dismissal you keep ignoring: "If you're not Big-Brother-like monitoring your kid, you're not a parent. Kids below middle-school age have no privacy."

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    217. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by tenco · · Score: 1

      It was in an unlocked apartment in a foreign country that they were on vacation in without any supervision for the kids at all.

      Right. Because we all know: all the bad people live in foreign countries. (you may place irony tags at will.)

    218. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ammit · · Score: 1

      That is hardly the point really is it!? The point is the girl is missing and nobody knows what happened to her, the topic is regarding a child location system, I think my point was fair regardless of the reasons a child went missing.

      --
      I argue because it's the internet....and I can.
    219. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by jeff419 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can we get an IP check on this, I bet it came from Redmond.

    220. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Invented" really is a good word for it.

    221. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      ... find a "safe" adult ... female adult with kids

      Yeah, that's really safe.

      That being said, you can't make them 100% safe, but there is a lot you can do to make them safer. I am not so sure that constant GPS tracking is one of them*.

      * (There is a small voice in the back of my head telling me I might feel differently on the GPS tracking the first time my daughter wants to go on a date...)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    222. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strangers are BAD.[...]teach your daughter to talk to the right strangers.

      It's the Sleeping Beauty thing all over again--the REAL point of which so many parents don't get.
      Instead of burning all the spinning wheels, TEACH the kid about spindles. Let her get jabbed with those pointy things a few times BEFORE she reaches 16; get the novelty of the item behind her.
      It's IGNORANCE of the subject that got the princess in trouble.
      http://dextr.xanga.com/643042343/sleeping-beauty-lesson-plans/

      gewg_

    223. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      My point was that the first priority in this situation is finding the kid, yell may not accomplish that. Once the kid is found and known the be safe, THEN you yell at the school.

    224. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you beat the kid with the carrot, and feed them with the stick. I thought everyone knew that. :)

    225. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by linux_geek_germany · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear Bot, you just failed the Turing test...

    226. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      It was the first week of school. That means no one has what bus and kids go together memorized yet (students or teachers). I got on the wrong bus a few times myself as a kid - once I realized it I told the bus driver and he took me back to school and they called my parents. The only possible danger here is if the kid makes a separate mistake and gets off at the wrong stop.

      Of course, in my schools for the first week or so all of the bus drivers checked the kids off of their notebook when they got off, so an extra kid would still be caught. I'm surprised that it got far enough to be more than an annoyance.

    227. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by scot4875 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, yelling might be "appropriate," but it's very unlikely to actually help the situation at all.

      However you justify it, yelling at some random school employee that answers the phone is about as useful as yelling at the guy busing tables because your food is cold. Sure, he'll probably do something to try to help (talk to the waitress/manager/whatever), but you're still a douche.

      And yes, before you ask, if your kid is missing and you latch on to the first person you find and start yelling at them, you're a douche. If your kid is missing, yes, emotions are going to be running high, but that seems like the most important time imaginable to remain level-headed and rational to try to locate and get them back safely as quickly as possible, no?

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    228. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Nah, the parents killed her. They made up the story to cover their own asses.

      Ok, so that is flamebait. But there's really no hard evidence of there being a kidnapper either, yet everyone seems to have agreed on that conclusion and a pedo at that. Accident and coverup? Abuse and coverup? (Why did that sniffer dog indicate a body had been in the boot of their car?) Some variation of münchausen syndrome by proxy for attention? (And A-list celebrity level at that) Economic gain? (They've earned plenty on interviews, movie rights and whatnot) If you don't think people can be that evil to their own daugther, take a reality check. It'd be different if there were witnesses to a kidnapper leaving with her but there are none. It's possible that it's just lucky circumstance that they had the right connections to the media, supporters that knew how to manlpulate the media and the girl being while and pretty, but they drove the media circus like pros not grieving parents. It's still one damn girl among eight billion, at times you'd think she was the new Messiah or something. A terrible tradegy for the parents I'm sure but if she'd been run over by a truck it'd be a note in the local newspapers.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    229. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This story seems to imply that the "man in a white van" was some pedophile or serial killer or whatever.

      But there is a 99% or more chance that in fact he was the kid's father, or uncle or something, and that this incident was related to some family drama about child custody or the like.

    230. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I'm surprised the driver didn't radio in and say that he had a misplaced student, and a flurry of activity after. I don't know about your school district, but every school district I know of has a radio.

          I just asked my friend's 13 year old son, and he confirmed the bus he rides has a radio. He can hear dispatch talking over it, but it's a short drive and he's never seen her actually use it.

          I know a teacher that was moved over to dispatch (school district politics suck). They run dispatch from before the first driver hits the road in the morning until every bus drops off it's kids and calls in to notify they're shutting down for the night.

          I'd say you should go tear them a new hole, but I'm sure you already did.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    231. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Kjella · · Score: 1

      That's about 95% modern hygiene and medicine, 5% everything else. And 72% of statictics are made on the spot, but seriously... extremely few were lost in the "we never saw them again" sense.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    232. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 'bald-faced lie', you giant heap of pustulent festering fail.

    233. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my parents would have done that when I was growing up, I probably would have been one of those notorious parent murderers.

      OP: Come on, your kid is not a 3 month old. She's not going to be scooped up by groups of pedophiles and sold off to sexual servitude in the third world any time soon.

    234. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a school bus driver I've seen kids more interested in their (electronic) toys than which bus they were boarding. Fortunately I had few enough kids to know who belonged and who didn't. And listening to the radio if one did get misplaced was quite interesting!

      Posting AC as That Geek Who Couldn't Hold A Tech Job in a Down Economy. Dang!

    235. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You missed my other long post, where I gave a whole slew of options, from cell phone based, to GPS dog collars, to building his own micro linux machine.

          I've actually been paying attention to this stuff, and working with variations for a while. nothing for kid tracking, but vehicle tracking for businesses and personal use.

          For example, I set up my car to send GPS and video to a web site, so I could be tracked crossing the country (California to Florida). If I disappeared for any reason, it would be clear where to start looking. Since my stops weren't planned (drive until I'm tired, sleep for a few hours, and continue).

          I did get a call in the middle of nowhere (Arizona, I believe), where I was tired, so I pulled into a brand new rest area. I got a call about 15 minutes later because Google Maps didn't show anything there. It looked like I had run off the road, but it was dark out and I had parked facing away from the highway, so the video just showed black.

          I'd prefer to be woken up because someone was concerned and verifying I was ok, than something happened, and the car had run too far off the road to notice. If I hadn't answered, there would have been a 911 call placed, and my last known coordinates were shown on the web page. :) If it had been an accident, the timestamp would have shown when the last update was sent.

          It's all perspective. Which is worse, a kid on the wrong bus, and the driver bringing it back to dispatch, or an adult friend or relative in a wrecked car in the middle of nowhere, unconscious and dying, one phone call away from being saved, since no one can see the car that ran off the road?

          I did get a whole bunch of calls when my last known position was in Texas near a bridge, in the middle of the night. The fuse blew in the power inverter, and the laptop ran on it's battery for about an hour before it shut down. From then on, there was no one to know if I was ok, but I had frequent calls checking up on my status. Luckily the entire drive only takes about 2.5 days, so I was less than a day from my destination. I opted not to stop and waste time trying to find a fuse, when I could just keep driving.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    236. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      And if you read a little more, you'll see that GPS devices won't protect children against their own parents... Really, I didn't know there were still people who believed the McCanns' story.

    237. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      No, because underreacting can lead to :

      1) serious harm or death to the child,
      2) arrest of the parents for child endangerment,
      3) loss of custudy of the child, due to child services and criminal charges,
      4) the child raised in one group home after another with no loving, caring, nurturing parent,
      5) all of the above.

    238. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      A student I know has an autism spectrum disorder, and is known for running away. He has a white wristwatch that can't be removed without tools, or a big cutter, that does provide GPS data. I don't know what the backend looks like, webpage, cellphone, etc., but his parents and caregivers are much relieved. So, something exists.

      Looks like there's a few options:

      http://www.google.ca/search?q=gps+bracelet+autistic

    239. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know about overreacting because nothing happened and I'd like to do so with my kids too, they get lost to easily. In sweden the cell phone operator gives out this service. You simply activate the cell phone account for tracking and they give you a live location anytime you like of the cell phone. I know telia.se does it for certain. There is also a company named Gpsgates that I think add software to a cell phone that has gps+3g/edge and it also gives you live info on position of the cellphone.

    240. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because we all know: all the bad people live in foreign countries.

      Not realy the point, the point being that any unfamiliar environment is dangerous, on the grounds that you aren't familiar with it.

      Just for starters, how well do you speak Portuguese?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    241. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Goodness...how did we EVER survive as a species before cell phones and GPS trackers??!?!

      Well, if you remember your freshman biology, we survived as a species because there were enough children around to present a viable gene pool after the usual casualties thinned their ranks.

      As a parent, it's natural to be primarily concerned with the survival of one's own progeny. It's not enough to say "Oh, there's plenty of children left to propagate the species", or as the redneck put it, "I'm not having more kids just to feed that damned alligator".

      That parents are (usually) more concerned about their own offspring shouldn't come as a shock. It's a tightrope walk between providing sufficient protection and sufficient autonomy, as both are important.

      I do admit to being a little conflicted about the use of these devices, even after admitting that I use them myself. It's one of those things where I want the ability to know the location of my child should I need to, but would fight against the government having the same information. It's like having a home security system -- OK if it's mine, and it's me being notified, but not OK if my "home security system" is a government CCTV.

      > And let's not forget we as kids weren't drugged by our parents like they are today. Amazing we learned in school and survived at all, truly.

      Agreed there. I fought the school district tooth and nail to keep her off Ritalin after the school diagnosed her as ADHD. But that's a whole 'nother story.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    242. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yes, bad things happen, but in terms of history, we are living in one of the most safest times ever.

      I live in South Korea, you insensitive clod!!!!!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    243. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Goodness...how did we EVER survive as a species before cell phones and GPS trackers??!?!

      When I was a kid, I roamed all over the neighborhood, and ones near us.

      You're certainly not the first to notice this. Where the great-grandfather traveled MILES as a kid, the grandfather traveled no more than a mile, the father never went off his street, and now his son isn't allowed off the lawn.

      This article's a year old, but it's still really relevant. Would this have been newsworthy a few generations ago? Mom lets 9-year-old take subway home alone.

    244. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The driver probably isn't covered by insurance if he's driving her in the wrong direction. It isn't the first time I've heard such reasons.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    245. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      You're acting like things didn't go wrong back then.

      Kids often died young. As it turns out, a lot of kids actually were molested (e.g., by priests) but couldn't tell anyone about it.

      Kids weren't drugged (or rather, treated for treatable conditions) - and many may have failed at life because of it, for all we know. Just because people in general have survived, doesn't mean that one is better off following the protocols of the 19th century in raising one's own children.

    246. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by v1 · · Score: 1

      Kids don't often learn responsibility if there isn't a combination of a carrot and a stick (I'm not suggesting beating your child with a stick mind you).

      But can we at least beat them with the carrot ?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    247. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes but we may be talking about a 4 or 5 year old. Seems like a lot to expect. You get on a bus and don't know where you are. Seems like a little kids nightmare as well as a parents.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    248. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would question pursuing the Linux or Open Source solution if others do the job better. It's the safety of your kid that matters here - not your own political correctness.

      Wait- Linux is PC?

      NOooooooooooooooooooooo!

    249. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      I wish more people would read the history of the world. Boys age 8 and 9 were expected to drive mule trains to their brothers and fathers in the field; often they were sent out on overnight trips with nothing but 4 mules and a horse for company. Girls that age were expected to run a kitchen; that meant slaughering small game, often hunting that game with a small caliber rifle, and preparing dinner.

      Folks, kids can do so much more than we allow them to do. They can act responsibly and make decisions for themselves; we as parents have to teach them how to make decisions.

      I'm constantly amazed at how we treat our kids like they're made of spun sugar and will dissolve if so much as a drop of rain hits them.

      Kids are tough; they are the progeny of the most successful predator to ever walk this planet.

      Teach them to make decisions, teach them how to act, and teach them what to do in unexpected situations.

      We fail our kids by not putting them in situations where they have to make decisions. We fail our kids every day by building an environment where their every need is met and where there is no price for failure.

      The kid should know her bus number. The kid should know her bus mates. The kid should know where she lives and her parents' phone numbers.

      And the parents should stop freaking out and look at this as a lesson for their child. The OP didn't say how the kid reacted; did she do the right thing? Call home from someone's house? Great. Reinforce that she made the right decision; talk about how to deal with it the next time.

      Did she freak out and throw a temper tantrum and go in to hysterics? Was she unable to tell an adult her name, parents' names and phone numbers, home address? Time to drill that into her head NOW! Before it's too late.

      BECAUSE THERE WILL BE A NEXT TIME!!!! And daddy with all his Open Source linux gadgets won't be able to make a decision for her. She needs to make that decision herself.

    250. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

      The vast majority don't live in Hicksville with you. I think you'll find infant mortality is quite high in places called Africa and Asia. Ask your geography teacher to show you them on a map, you fat imbecile.

      I don't think the kids in Africa and Asia would be helped much by GPS tracking, either. Plastic is not a good source of nutrition, after all, you skinny genius.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    251. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      When I was a child, I was way too literal. My parents told me that I wasn't allowed to cross the street, so I wouldn't. Every day, the bus would drop me off in front of my house and I would walk in. One day, the bus went down my block in the opposite direction and the doors opened across the street from my house. Following my parents' directions (don't cross the street), I stayed on the bus. After all, if I got off, I'd have to cross the street and I wasn't allowed to do that! As the bus drove off, the other kids who got off at my stop ran to my house and told my mother that I stayed on the bus. My mother had to hop in her car and chase after the bus to get me off. Best I can figure, I planned to ride the bus until he dropped me off in front of my house as usual.

      My parents' reaction, I'm sure, was a modification of the "no crossing the street" rule, to handle the "dropped off across the street from home" case. No, they didn't have the option of a child locating device, but I'm sure their method (teaching your child to handle the situation) would work just a nicely today. As an added bonus, it costs less, is less likely to break, and can be applied to multiple varying situations. (What to do when encountering a stranger, what to do if offered food they are allergic to, etc.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    252. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, being that the term "infant" is defined as up to the age of 1, I don't think GPS tracking would have a whole lot of effect on infant mortality statistics, no matter whether you live in Africa or Hicksville.

    253. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      As a parent of complex and challenging situations, I can say that you are talking yourself into a pickle.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    254. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he also doesn't know the truth about children's crime statistics.

      Seriously, despite what CNN/Fox/MSNBC/etc would have you believe, the world is not full of child murdering pedophiles. Let's not blame the school system entirely. How old is your child? Can she learn basic numbers and then use that knowledge to get on the bus on her own? Can we stop holding hands and destroying our children?

      In 6 years of schools, I knew what bus I got on in the morning. I knew it was the same bus I got on to go home. Oh, and then I walked to school for 7 years, two miles, along a road with at least three unleashed large dogs, no sidewalk in places, and was also a busy route to the interstate. In snow, rain, sleet, in the darkness, while wearing dark colored clothes.

      I doubt he's really looked into the school system; otherwise he might be, I don't know, volunteering at the school to help make sure his child gets on the right bus instead of looking for a way to plant a GPS tracking device on his kid.

    255. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      You've obviously lived in a vacuum for some time. You'd be amazed at the current state of technology for asexual reproduction. Easier for women, as they have sperm banks. For men you need also a womb bank, but they sorta have them too.

    256. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And exactly where do you think this would be happening? At the school as the kid gets on with the bus drivers and teachers watching, or at the bus stop with parents, kids, and the bus driver as eye witnesses? What kid would believe that, a few blocks from home? If you ever become a parent, I'd hope you teach your children much better than that.

      The closest I've EVER seen to that is the most likely kidnapping situation.

      I was a friend of the family, and I saw the kid walking away from the bus as it was starting to rain, so I pulled up, beeped my horn, and told him to get in. He didn't know if I was really suppose to pick him up. Really, I hadn't been asked, but I was in the right place at the right time. And I really took him home so he wouldn't be soaked by the time he got there.

      According to the FBI, statistically about 76% of child kidnappings involve family or acquaintances. The remaining 24% are the most likely to involve a firearm. "Get in the car or I'll shoot you, and then kill your mommy too" has a lot more power than "Hey little Jimmy, how is 2nd grade going? Want a lolly pop? Lets go for a ride."

      The only real kidnapping I've been involved in was a family kidnapping. No, I was on the good side. The mother was staying with some family. She was going to bring her son to stay with his father. Mother and father both agreed on this. He was staying with the grandmother for a few minutes while we ran to the store. We got back, the son is missing. A family member at the house tells us (rather impolitely) that grandmother doesn't approve of the son going to stay with his father. The mother is furious, scared, crying. I, the good friend of both the mother and father, call the police, explain the situation, and an officer is dispatched immediately. If the little boy wasn't involved, it would have been almost funny, as the grandfather threatened to physically harm and/or kill me. I was being polite. The cop, a nice guy, probably late 20's, over 6' tall standing right beside me, and the grandfather being a frail old man. I can take a punch from a big guy if I have to, so I wasn't scared in the least. I was polite and as physically non-aggressive as could be (calm voice, hands down at my sides, not moving forward or back). All I said were things like "Sir, please do not threaten me. Sir, please do not come any closer to me. Sir, I'd appreciate if you wouldn't threaten to injure me. All we are asking for is for her son to be returned."

      The officer was kind enough to say "I could take every one of you to jail for kidnapping, and you will spend years behind bars. Or, you can return her son."

      After all was said and done, he officer said he thought the grandfather was going to swing at me. If he did, he would have been in handcuffs. He did ask if we wanted to press charges. This was the mothers call. She didn't want them in jail, but she did worse. They were to never see her or her son again. With that, we drove away.

      We don't know exactly what was said to the son for the few hours that he was taken, but he was terrified of both his mother and father. Luckily, I'd been friends with them for a while, and he did trust me still (they forgot to instill fear of me into him.), so I was able to calm him down, and let him know that whatever he was told was wrong, and his parents really do love him.

      Non-custodial kidnappings happen more than you'd like to think. Not every one ends up as an arrest, so all the police would have is a record of a call to a domestic dispute with no arrests made and no charges filed. This doesn't end up in the statistics.

      My ex-wife did something very similar. She had the kids in the car, and was threatening to leave so I'd never see them again. A friend of mine coincidentally came over. He parked behind her car, and then sat on the front bumper of my car. She could

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    257. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by db32 · · Score: 1

      While I generally agree with the ideas you present in the post I submit that there is a different reason behind it all. To simply discount something new because the old way worked is a little goofy. I mean...mankind survived a long time before we figured out washing our hands and cooking our food prevented disease. Back then we just made silly rules about how the mighty powers that be didn't want you eating XYZ because he would punish you with sickness and death for it. The same goes for the march of technology. The reality of it is tagging and tracking kids IS more effective and probably will wind up saving some kids. This very thing has actually been going on in Mexico for a while now. Rich people have been tagging themselves with GPS trackers because they are such big targets for the kidnappings.

      Now...all that said...my alternate reason. I had to do the same kind of thing as a kid, but the reality is, you could screw up anywhere in the nearby neighborhoods and odds are someone's parents would recognize you and your parents would find out what you were up to. This was all about community. When you have real community then your kids are also protected by that many eyes thing. It comes down to an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. The GPS thing is worth it's weight in gold for retrieval, even more if that is your child being retrieved. However, what we have lost in most places is that community piece that would go worlds in preventing scenarios where you would need that GPS tracking.

      If I didn't live in an area where I was comfortable with my kids roaming around safely you can bet your ass I would tag them. It kills me that this site so often has people blathering about "well you should parent and watch your kids" and in some cases it has gone far enough to blame the parents when their child dies in an accident. Then when a parent goes a bit far after a real event they are mocked for it. Lose your child and then see how you feel about having that safe recovery option at your disposal. I could maybe understand if it was just paranoia, but this guy actually lost his kid for a while. As a parent I can't even imagine the feeling. Just the momentary feeling of turning around in a busy place and not seeing your kid because they moved to your other side or followed the other parent around a corner can be bad enough.

      I also think it is a bit goofy to ask for parenting advice from a crowd that consists of those voted least likely to ever have a chance to breed. Having been a child does not make you qualified in raising children at all in the same way that having been in a plane doesn't make you qualified to be an instructor pilot.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    258. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your signature is wrong. in quantum mechanics, observables only make sense after you've normalized the wavefunction, so in your case what you should have said was:

      | cat > 1/sqrt(2) | living cat > + 1/sqrt(2) | dead cat >

      which when added up leads to:

        = 50% living cat + 50% dead cat = 1 cat

    259. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      You, I went to kindergarten in a FREAKIN FOREIGN COUNTRY, and had to transfer buses before I got home. I never once got on the wrong bus, because my parents told me if I did that I'd probably never see them again.

      I knew that I had to get on the #5, transfer to the #4, and get off when I got to my stop. If I could handle this at 5 years of age in the 1970s, I'm sure kids nowadays can too. After all, most modern five year olds I know can already read the bloody satellite guide, and find Dora's web site on the internet.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    260. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew my address AND my phone number from kindergarten

      I still remember the phone number my parents had when I was three. My children learned to respond to "What's your name?", "What's your phone number?" and "Where do you live?" with accurate information as soon as they could talk. The answers to these questions were the first full sentences my children spoke. My wife laughed at my Skinnerian operant conditioning techniques, but ice cream is a powerful reinforcement for toddlers. It took only a few sessions over the course of a few days for my children to learn.

    261. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          What the hell are you thinking? Kids don't need to learn to read numbers and letters. What kind of future would that bring us?

          School is to keep them busy while we work, play, or whatever. School is not an institute of learning. Everyone knows this.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    262. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Well, if your kid dies by some oddball method, you can mourn their passing, but don't feel guilty that you didn't protect them from that 1 in a million chance. Otherwise, you need to be consistent and protect them from every oddball possibility. Make them wear a helmet at all times in case some meteorite hits them. They should have a kevlar vest on even while sleeping, in case some gangbangers do a driveby on the wrong house. Make sure you boil all tap water, just in case the water refinery lets a pathogen through that is lethal to the young. Etc.

      PS. Statistics lesson for the day: Small odds are still small, even if they happen to you.

    263. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb shits can never pay too heavily for their mistakes. Fucking retards got what they deserved. Fuck people like them, they don't deserve children.

    264. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by beav007 · · Score: 1

      A 1:1,000,000 chance will occur 9 times out of 10.

    265. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      That is indicative of a far larger problem on the schools part.

      now; this is where I agree. If the school is regularly losing children and hasn't successfully done anything about it, this is a sign that something deep is wrong. They probably don't manage to fix problems with education either. Look into it deeply and if this seems to be true, try to find a way to get your kid into a different school. In the meantime, teach your kid how to get himself home; contact you; be safe etc. That's much more valuable long term anyway.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    266. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by darrylo · · Score: 1

      No, if 4- or 5- year old children can learn how to take out and play videogames (we're talking xboxes, playstations, and wiis here, not playskool stuff), they can learn how to press a button to call mommy or daddy. It may take a minor amount of training, but it shouldn't be difficult (as long as no learning disabilities exist, of course).

      Of course, we're not familiar with the particular child in question, but teaching button mashing shouldn't be hard. :-)

    267. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sir+fer · · Score: 0

      The word "devoid" does not mean what you obviously seem to think it does.

      Try checking a dictionary before making an asshat of yourself

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    268. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 1

      Wow you happened to get two things wrong. First you imply some erroneous xenophobia in my post that didn't exist and secondly you don't even understand what the term irony means. Double fail.

    269. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      it's so statistically unlikely that a stranger is going to randomly abduct a child vs. them being abducted by someone they know

      Of course, you should provide something to back that up. How about:
      http://www.life-prints.com/ChildAbductionPrevention.html

      United States Justice Department's 2002 statistics:

      More than 797,500 children abducted
      25 percent, were family abductions
      Only 58,200 were abducted by someone other than a family member
      Of those, 115 were taken by complete or partial strangers

      So for the math impaired, 99.99% of kids that are abducted are NOT abducted by a stranger.

    270. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Wouldn't that prove that 1 cat going into the box equals 2.2824 cats?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    271. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      child slave harvesting organization where they just sweep around and pick up all the tracked kids.

      Yeah, because you know how difficult it can be to find children unless you've got a tracking signal leading you to them.

      I'm sure you meant this as a joke, but who the fuck are the (currently 2) moderators who modded this Interesting?

    272. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by el+americano · · Score: 1

      I'd agree, except that does not apply in this case. Since it already happened to his child, it would be logical to assume that the odds of losing his child is greater than 1/7,000,000,000. Keep in mind that it's not only to avoid a headline-grabbing abduction, but any prolonged loss of contact. They may say his child was never in danger, but that is small comfort when you have to spend hours searching for your child after the school calls and asks why your he/she is absent.

      I can also sympathize with the submitter not seeking a solution that depends on the school. Although that might seem a reasonable thing to do, after talking with them, he probably got the impression that they don't think they did anything wrong and would need to see multiple repetitions of this error before taking any corrective action. Parents are a school administrator's #1 enemy - expect to be treated as such, unless they're trying to get money or volunteer work out of you.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    273. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      This is why the invented brown alerts.

      I beleive the color you are looking for is amber:
      www.amberalert.gov

    274. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Faerunner · · Score: 1

      If you have never been at a school at the end of the day I forgive you for your optimism.

      Students may not have different busses every day but there is no way a teacher or aide can walk every single student in even a small (500 kids K-6) school to the correct bus and make sure they get on, and kids DO make mistakes if left on their own. Busses don't always pull in in the same order, so if they're all in before the kids are called, you can't rely on placement in line to help the kid find the bus. If they're called as they pull in, the kids may not hear it, may not be ready (being slow to pack) or may mistake a different bus number for their own. They're following friends, or they forget and they're scared to ask, or the bus driver doesn't know because they're a new kid anyway and all kindergarteners look the same to the driver, etc etc. And this is if the kid actually HEARS the PA system over the classroom chaos and their friend shouting to them about the newest Wii game and can they come over after school?!

      The best thing a parent can do is make sure their child absolutely knows their bus number before school starts (I'm pretty sure you can call the school and ask, and they should be able to tell you a few weeks in advance of school starting, unless the district is run by the seat of its pants), make sure the teacher knows if the child needs any special consideration when loading busses the first few weeks, and let the driver know to keep an eye out to make sure the child boards in the afternoon. Drivers are capable of radioing other busses to check on student changes (like when Molly rides Susie's bus home instead of her own), but they need to know that Molly rides their bus first.

    275. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Faerunner · · Score: 1

      Ok, that's a bit much. See above comment about talking to bus driver Re: making sure kid gets on bus. If kid does not, driver should radio other busses. I do agree though that "losing" 5% of your class is an atrocious record for the school. What exactly goes on there in the afternoons?

    276. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I don't think most wrong-bus trips end that way. But then, I don't know what school district you live in...

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    277. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      This was in broad daylight with other adults present (and no one managed to get a license plate number)

      That's because everyone was too busy enjoying the street drama and sucking everything in for post crisis gossip sessions. That snatcher probably did everyone a favour by giving five minutes of excitement to otherwise terminally boring lives.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    278. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with that, Which is why we taught our daughter to: spell her name, memorize both cell phone numbers and be able to write them out, memorize her address and to write it out, how to deal with people and what to do when lost. However, it's a big planet, and getting lost at the age of five can easily get you killed, from any number of dangers. It's a very dangerous world, and I don't recall ever jumping over the I need to protect her from pedophiles fence. Simply falling down a steep hill and into a creek is enough to kill a small child. Wandering onto a farm with a bull is enough to get killed. Crossing a highway at the bend of a road is an easy way to get killed. Why there must be easily a million ways for a 5 year old to get killed or have an accident that causes permanent disabling injuries. What are the odds of a five year old mistaking a belladonna berry for a blueberry? About 1:1. Fortunately, it doesn't produce fruits in the Spring, although it has naturalized in the area, and I teach my daughter not to eat plants. that's not to say she would not do so were she hungry, or alone. She is after all five, and curious. A dangerous combination. Plus, my daughter won't begin kindergarten until August, this is just a summer intro. So while I teach her how to deal with life, it's a lot of responsibility to place solely on the shoulders of a five year old. Which is why we prosecute parents for leaving them alone at the age of five. If you spent more than 24 hours with a 5 year old, and actually watched what they do when left to their own decisions, you'd know this simple truth. Young children are quite capable of making mistakes that would quickly kill themselves without having to bring in bogeymen to do it for them. Striking a match and it accidentally ignites their clothing is one more example. Reaching in a hand to pet a pretty doggie can easily disfigure a small child. And on an on.

    279. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      ...then why did the child run away?

      Stop making statistics up!

    280. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 5 year old doesn't need privacy. It has another name: neglect.

    281. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm... buttered womens advocate. I'll advocate that!

      Come on, people! Where are the spelling and grammar nazis!

    282. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by marafa · · Score: 0

      i take it you are not a parent then?

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    283. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by alexburke · · Score: 1

      Holy crap- you are, what we in the biz call, an over-reacting parent. Calm down and take it easy before you destroy your daughter's life.

      I have mod points and am forfeiting the right to moderate this story by posting this. I second this sentiment (although I, myself, would try to not be quite so harsh in the delivery). Here are two links I think you should read, and a book I think you should buy (I bought a copy myself and gave several extra copies to friends with kids):

      http://freerangekids.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/why-i-let-my-9-year-old-ride-the-subway-alone/

      http://freerangekids.wordpress.com/

      http://www.amazon.com/Free-Range-Kids-Children-Freedom-Without/dp/0470471948

      I also recommend watching the video in the Amazon link.

      Cheers,
      Alex

    284. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't mean to be a flame, because as a fellow parent (of toddlers, no less) I understand that it can be an extremely stressful and fear-inducing thing to lose track of your child. But I agree with the parent: get some perspective on things by waiting for a bit before subjecting your daughter to Big-Brother-like monitoring.

      Not only do I think you are overreacting, you are sending the wrong message to your school-age daughter. She doesn't need 24-7 tracking, she needs lessons in dealing with unexpected situations. Instead of jumping directly to an electronic device, teach her what to do if she gets lost... the same strategy that's been used successfully by parents for many, many years: find a "safe" adult (police officer, female adult with kids) and tell them that she's lost. If she's old enough to attend school, she's old enough to learn her phone number and address.

      Besides, if she's anything like most kids, anything you "attach" to her (short of a steel shackle) she is going to remove and leave behind or lose. :-)

      Again, I understand your reaction (on one level) but I think you're overreacting.

      You seem to imply that all men not in uniform and females without kids are criminals and should be avoided at all costs. Either you are paranoid or you live in a very sick society, which one is it?

    285. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by alanshot · · Score: 2, Informative

      if you check the statistics, child abductions* have actually DROPPPED since 1950.

      The difference is the instant-on, worldwide news networks. It used to be some kid got abducted once every month (WAG=Wild Ass Guess, only an example) and nobody outside the city knew about it; Therefore according to the rest of the country, nothing ever happened. Now a kid gets abducted every 3 months (another WAG), and suddenly since it hits the WWW and international headline news media, OMG!!!!! we are worse off than we were in 1950!!!! OMFG!!! BEWAAAAAREEE OF THE FREAKS!!!!!STRANGER DANGER!!! STRANGER DANGER!!!

      So are we really worse off than 1950, or are we just more acutely aware of what is going on around the world? Based on the statistics, I think its the latter.

      I look forward to cautiously allowing my kids (toddlers now) to have the same freedoms I did as a kid. Letting them run wild in the 'hood for hours, and only check in once in a while, etc.

      Granted, I am not in the same rural environment as my childhood, but I am not about to chain my kids to the house simply because we arent surrounded by cornfields.

      Get a life helicopter parents!

      *assuming strangers abducting kids, excluding relatives, etc that run off with them due to custody disputes, ec.

    286. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why the invented brown alerts.

      I beleive the color you are looking for is amber: www.amberalert.gov

      Aargh ... I cannot resist.

      If you're the parent, it's definitely brown, not amber.

    287. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Great observation!

    288. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Yep.... Exactly, that kind of stuff is true. My wife is a kindergarten teacher and in the last job she had the teachers themselves were responsible to put the kids on the right buses (they had a quite efficient system, but sometimes a kid needed another bus and that's when problems started).

      Anyway, some kids aren't scheduled for a bus when parents say they come to pick them up. Now what happens when a parent fails to show up? A logical person would say, ah I know where the kid is supposed to go to (grandma, home, whatever...), I'll just drive them there, it's on my way home anyway. That is not allowed, and the reason is.... insurance... yup...

    289. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      > but for the life of me I can't remember what the watch was called.

      Project Lifesaver ?

    290. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Actually, the carrot and stick is an analogy concerning an ass. The ass or donkey does what you want by manipulating a reward (in this case, a carrot) where as the ass is known to become more stubborn when you beat it.

      Take the same principles, alter it to adjust to a child, and you have positive reinforcement training without calling them asses.

    291. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Supergibbs · · Score: 1

      He knows his daughter better than we all do.

      I know it's your signature...but still.... haha

      --
      First post! (just in case I am...)
    292. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, gee wiz, lets see how this differs.

      First, the school lost the kid, presumably by letting her off at the wrong stop or putting her on the wrong bus. In my area, letting 6 year kids off the bus at the wrong stops happened about 30 times last year. Of those thirty times, the child reported that it wasn't their place and the drivers was convinced it was and ordered the kid off 4 or 5 times.

      Now when this happens, several things are different from you playing in the neighborhood and calling your parents every couple hours. First, they aren't in their neighborhood. They are somewhere completely different and foreign to them, most likely beyond a safe walking distance (street crossings, traffic, bad neighborhoods, and so on) for someone that age. Second, they are by themselves, not with a neighbor playing, they are all alone looking for their home. Finally, there is no fucking phone for them to use even if they do remember their phone number.

      And don't give me the bullshit that every kid should know their address and phone number by the time they get into school. It's irrelevant because they most likely won't have the money to hit a payphone or the knowledge to reverse the charges, and even if they did while somehow being able to reach the numbers in the phone booth designed for adults and not 5 and 6 year old kids, they don't know where in the hell they are so you still need a way to find them. In a panic, emergency, or stress situations, most normal people not trained to handle the situation will make a critical mistake. Even with training, people still make mistakes and I'm talking about competent adults, not 6 year old kids.

      Your simply equating two entirely different situations. And if your young kid went missing while coming home from school and you wasn't concerned about it, then I will suggest that you shouldn't be a parent at all. But just in case you are concerned when you child comes up missing, do you want to spend 5 hours looking for her or 5 minutes to figure out where you need to go and fifteen minutes to find her?

    293. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, suppose the teacher does get them on the right bus but the kid, sally johnson responds when the driver is looking for sally jones. Now there are possibly two kids getting off at the wrong spot and if they are young enough, they might just listen to the bus driver when he says this is where you get off.

    294. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ammit · · Score: 1

      I don't think this discussion is about what people THINK happened, the facts are that nobody actually knows and that this kind of a device MAY have been useful. You missed my point entirely.

      --
      I argue because it's the internet....and I can.
    295. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's your daddy?

    296. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Here's an idea.

      Next time you go to the mall with the family, teach your daughter to talk to strangers.
      What? No way! Strangers are BAD. BAD EVIL people who want to randomly inject her with drugs so she'll become an addict and a regular client.

      Next time you go to the mall with the family, teach your daughter to talk to the right strangers. Mall clerks at security booths. Other parents. Security guards. Bus drivers. If you can teach your daughter to become street smart, she will be able to take care of herself when you're not around. She'll be safe even if you are unable to access your handheld, or the internet is down, or the power goes out...

      Mall clerks?! haven't you seen observe and report?! other parents?! haven't you seen harry potter?! security guards?! haven't you seen observe and report?! Bus drivers?! haven't you seen south park?! if you can teach your daughter to become street smart she will be able to take care of herself when you're not around?! hell no! teach your daughter to become a kung fu bad ass and she will be able to take care of that punk ass coming to harass her.

        The best defense is a good offense. The best offense involves a gun and lots of ammo.

    297. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      ROFL - when i saw this story the number of comments was "911". That is one way to make a child locater

      Here is post 912

    298. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by tenco · · Score: 1

      There's an incongruity between what i said and what i meant, so it's irony. For xenophobia: i thought that this girl was abducted, but wikipedia states that this isn't clear. So your remark about "unfamiliar environment" (as another post mentions) may be valid. My bad.

    299. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by tenco · · Score: 1

      Not realy the point, the point being that any unfamiliar environment is dangerous, on the grounds that you aren't familiar with it.

      So you consider your first day at a new job dangerous because it's an unfamiliar environment?

      Just for starters, how well do you speak Portuguese?

      I don't speak portuguese, yet. If i travel to a foreign country i learn important vocabulary, grammar and customs. Because i'm not expecting of others to speak my foreign language. And to not eat with my right hand in India, e.g.

    300. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Yeah but I can't, as a twenty something male, talk to that child to find out where they are meant to be. A mass amount of crack jobs and paranoid fuckers have completely destroyed the chance for us to *not* want these sorts of things.

      I've been discussing with my partner recently, a great many things about children, and one of them has been exactly this. And let me tell you we will be tracking them - not to be creepy and know where they are, but if it's 4 in the morning and they haven't reported in, I want to be able to call and say "Where are you?" and know they're not giving false information with a weapon to their head. It might never happen, it certainly never did to me, but fucked if I'm going to try and get by with less data than I can obtain for myself.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    301. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? They rig the phones so the GPS to be on all the time - If its anything like my phone (N95) that would be totally useless. The battery dies in less than 2 hours.
      You would have to be pretty dumb not to know.

      just imagine the conversation
      Hey - how long does the battery on your phone last?
                    Oh between 4 and 5 days depending on how many calls I make
      Gees - thats good, I'm lucky to get 2.5 hours. i wonder why?
                      Umm

    302. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by kshade · · Score: 1

      I do admit to being a little conflicted about the use of these devices, even after admitting that I use them myself. It's one of those things where I want the ability to know the location of my child should I need to, but would fight against the government having the same information. It's like having a home security system -- OK if it's mine, and it's me being notified, but not OK if my "home security system" is a government CCTV.

      How do you make sure your child doesn't get used to being tracked? When they grow up they might think it's natural to have a GPS on their wrist and a camera in their home.

    303. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by kshade · · Score: 1

      Finally, there is no fucking phone for them to use even if they do remember their phone number.

      http://i3.iofferphoto.com/img/item/900/596/06/LDfNZGm2693lLlj.jpg

    304. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Finite9 · · Score: 1

      Did you read Risk too? good book.

      --
      "Everyone knows that vi vi vi is the number of the beast" -- Richard Stallman
    305. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by SpooForBrains · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > They might change their tune if (as the parent post points out) it's a 4 yr old girl/boy.

      My four year old boy got separated from us in the local supermarket. Due to some strange quirk of the mind (who can fathom the mind of a four year old boy?) he decided we must have left without him, rather than, say, we were in the next aisle (which we were). So he headed out of the main doors and wandered around for a bit looking for us. When he was picked up by the local Community Support Officers, despite being in a state of some distress, he was able to tell them his parents names and where he had been when we got separated, so that they could help him find us. Which they did.

      Children, even small, wooly-headed children, are much more capable than they are often given credit for. Teaching your child how to behave in an unexpected situation and crediting them with the intelligence and capability to look after themselves is the best way to ensure they make it through life safely. It's not the only way, but its far and away the most effective.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    306. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      I gave my daughter a Firefly when she was in first grade for all of the reasons every has mentioned. They are incredibly easy to use. However, there is still one fatal flaw -- they have to be turned on.

      You may not think that's a problem but it was for my daughter. See, the school absolutely insists that all cell phones are turned off during the day. I'm not talking about "mute" or "vibrate" or anything. Off. And yes, they would actually do random checks to verify. I tried to tell them that you can restrict who calls the Firefly so it won't be randomly ringing during the day but it was no good. In the end, it was up to my daughter to remember to turn it on. She almost never did.

      Some schools do have that policy. Mine didn't, and cellphones were allowed in my classroom. The largest difficulty I experienced as a teacher was the kids calling their parents cause "Timmy pushed me!", etc.

      However, for a teacher with any level of real control over her classroom, it doesn't take long for calling someone on the phone to join going to the bathroom or sharpening a pencil as activities that you need to raise your hand and ask permission for first.

      Also, my students had phones with restricted calling lists and no text capability... and most of them were just learning to spell their own names. Texting was not an issue. I imagine it's the bane of middle school teacher's life.

    307. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      So just because you were a relatively smart kid that didn't scare easily, the same applies to all the other children out there?

      I gotta say (just going on my own experience as a child a few years ago here), most kids are stupid. Teachers and workers in the education system are often neglectful and stupid, or possibly just overworked (too many kids to keep track of, etc.). If I have kids some day, I'll want to know where they are at all times until they're able to take care of themselves (which is somewhere around the age of 12) - and if they're not with someone I can absolutely trust (which, when it comes to children, would probably be about 3 people in the world, including my parents...), that means GPS or something similar.

    308. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      But if the kid _does_ get on the wrong bus, GPS tells you where the hell to pick him/her up...

    309. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Amazing we learned in school and survived at all, truly.

      Is this the ultimate example post for selection bias?

      If you hadn't survived or didn't learn anything in school you couldn't have posted.

      Do you also eschew other modern safety systems - insist on cars with no anti-lock brakes or traction control, refuse modern medications, only drink untreated water, ...

    310. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by pbhj · · Score: 1

      If your child gets abducted then the chances of it happening are unlikely to provide any solace.

      I think you're being harsh on the McCanns - it's simply a sad indictment on society that you can't leave a sleeping child alone and not expect them to be abducted.

      This system may not be perfect, as people here often say - no system of security can be 100% sercure. You appear to be saying in one breath that we shouldn't try and keep track of kids and in another that not keeping track of them is abhorrent.

    311. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by pbhj · · Score: 1

      You've missed the main requirement - it's not to ensure she gets on a particular bus, it's for her parents to be able to locate her.

    312. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by pbhj · · Score: 1

      perhaps its my paranoia light flashing because of my client, i can understand your concern, but 10s of thousands, nay 10s of millions of kids make it thought the school system every year without their parents needing to freak out like that.

      So to parents bereaved of their children do you say "it's OK, look all the other parents still have their kids!" ?

    313. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 1

      There's an incongruity between what i said and what i meant, so it's irony

      That's not irony.

    314. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a system of pneumatic tubes and RFID controlled valves.

    315. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by pbhj · · Score: 1

      She'll be safer even if you are unable to access your handheld, or the internet is down, or the power goes out...

      Fixed.

      You know that mall clerks and parents and security guards, and yes cops too, are all potential abductors. No, you're right, not everyone is bad or evil; yes I encourage my kid to speak to strangers. My message is "find a Mum, a lady with kids, and tell her you're lost" - I think that statistically is likely to be the best option (though some Mums I know makes this a scary proposition too!).

      Do you know what would be even safer. If, assuming her parents are benevolent, her parents know where she is when she's lost.

    316. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by lysdexia · · Score: 1

      Only if it's no larger than your thumb.

    317. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Leave room for a look-up table and multiple phone numbers so the tattoo artist can add more and mark which is current.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    318. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      We live very close to the school our daughter attends, and in a neighbourhood with several other children in her class (never mind her school) and yet she's the only one who walks herself to school.

      Most of the other kids are driven (a couple blocks) and dropped off, and the rest are escorted by their parents down the sidewalk.

      You don't have to live in a retirement area for there to be no other children to walk with, you just have to live near paranoid people.

      Incidentally, its a beautiful old suburb with pretty trees, low traffic and no crime to speak of.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    319. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by lysdexia · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of tired of the term ADD. Don't get me wrong, Aderall has helped me to no end as an adult, but I'm not sure that my mind operates at a cognitive deficit. A buddy of mine put it this way: "ADD is an advantage. It's good when Lazy Thag notices the lion while everyone else in the tribe is trying to pick all the berries before the birds get them". I prefer to think of amphetamines as a turbo button.

    320. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      A single case out of millions of children, over a period of years? You might as well worry about lightning strikes. Next on Slashdot:

      Making a Lighting Conductor System For Your Child (must run Linux).

      But if you're prepared to build some kind of custom GPS system, wouldn't it be simpler to, you know, lock the door instead?

    321. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      and know they're not giving false information with a weapon to their head.

      You mean you haven't agreed a duress signal in advance with your child?

    322. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safety pin will get you expelled in today's school system.

    323. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Now when this happens, several things are different from you playing in the neighborhood and calling your parents every couple hours. First, they aren't in their neighborhood. They are somewhere completely different and foreign to them, most likely beyond a safe walking distance (street crossings, traffic, bad neighborhoods, and so on) for someone that age. Second, they are by themselves, not with a neighbor playing, they are all alone looking for their home. Finally, there is no fucking phone for them to use even if they do remember their phone number. And don't give me the bullshit that every kid should know their address and phone number by the time they get into school. It's irrelevant because they most likely won't have the money to hit a payphone or the knowledge to reverse the charges, and even if they did while somehow being able to reach the numbers in the phone booth designed for adults and not 5 and 6 year old kids, they don't know where in the hell they are so you still need a way to find them. In a panic, emergency, or stress situations, most normal people not trained to handle the situation will make a critical mistake. Even with training, people still make mistakes and I'm talking about competent adults, not 6 year old kids."

      Hmm..."I" knew enough to get home. Yes..I've been lost due to something like this too as a kid. It was a long time ago, but, I think I found a store, borrowed the phone to call my parents. I was about 9-10 at the time I think.

      It isn't rocket science...I didn't grow up super sheltered, so there was no need to panic or fear in me. Unless you are raised to panic and be scared of everything, when a situation presents itself, you're not likely to freak out, IMHO.

      Heck I was used to being on my own...when Mom took me to the big shopping malls in Dallas when growing up...I'd say I'd meet her at "X" at a set time...and off I'd go on my own around the mall, looking at the skateboard shop, reading books in the book stores, toy stores...etc. I was used to be let on my own at a fairly young age. The meet times were pretty short when young, but, as I got older and more trustworthy, we'd sometimes split most all day, and even if I wanted to find her early, I knew mostly which stores and which departments she'd be in if I wanted to find her.

      I can't believe that kids today are more stupid than we were....?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    324. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ammit · · Score: 1

      Parents leaving their kids unattended is hardly a lightening strike. And talking of those...how about for planes rather than kids...given the recent news that is.

      --
      I argue because it's the internet....and I can.
    325. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > How do you make sure your child doesn't get used to being tracked? When they grow up they might think it's natural to have a GPS on their wrist and a camera in their home.

      You make sure by talking to your child and making sure they understand the implications, not just putting systems in place with no explanation. It's the difference between parenting and acting like an autocratic government. A suspicious person would point out that some of the techniques are the same, because they've missed all the communication between parent and child about intent, scope, trust, and ethics.

      If the original poster's intent was just to lojack their child with no explanation and no boundaries, I'd say he should take a hard look at his own motives before proceeding.

      Again, in the case of Latitude, it's a volunteer service, and we are mutually tracked -- she can see my position if she chooses to, and I can see hers if I need to. This is quite a bit different from some faceless flunky tracking our every move just because he can.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    326. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Parents leaving their kids unattended is hardly a lightening strike.

      I mean the probability of being kidnapped.

      And talking of those...how about for planes rather than kids...given the recent news that is.

      Indeed - perhaps a (Linux based) lightning conductor system for your child is the more urgent need here after all.

    327. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by cprincipe · · Score: 1

      Unless your daughter has special needs where if she got off the bus in a different location and wouldn't be able to communicate with responsible adults, I'd recommend taking a chill pill and going over to the Free Range Kids blog and realize that your job is to raise an adult, not a child. When I was in first grade I was riding city buses in the 70's in the midst of crime that's probably ten times worse than today's climate. Get a grip.

      --

      bun-fhuinneog agam!

    328. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ammit · · Score: 1

      There have been numerous posts regarding the apparent can of worms opened by me commenting on the Mcann case. :-/ Most of them are assuming one outcome or the other... all I can say is if there was a system to track that little girl maybe it would have helped. I think a lightening conductor system would be awesome...I for one would love that. Lets start a new thread.

      --
      I argue because it's the internet....and I can.
    329. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprint also has an offering call "Family Locator" and it allows you to set-up geo-fencing type setups as well. Such as you know that during hours x-y she should be home, and from hours d-f she should be in school. The system can automatically track her, and if she leaves those defined zones during those defined times, then it will send you an sms alert.

    330. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by tenco · · Score: 1

      You may recheck your definition of irony then.

    331. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by kshade · · Score: 1

      But communicating probably isn't enough, especially if parents force their children to wear a tracker. If they convince them to do so and accept a no it's okay, though.

      And: Children probably don't care about their parent's location all that much, so it's not really a deal. IMO it would be good if the child chooses a one-time password and gives it to its parents. If they use it to locate the kid they'll need a new one. That way the kid can be pretty sure that the tracking system will only be used in emergency and not for watching every step it takes.

    332. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 1

      Irony is the use of a word or phrase contrary to it's literal meaning. The only thing ironic in your post was your ironic use of the word irony.

    333. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      Schools should start small and not grow much.

      The efficiency of huge schools is pretty much an illusion. Sure you may cut down a bit on support staff salaries, but it's never as much as you think. It will sometimes make sense if you have a special facility that is expensive -- such as a swimming pool. (One school here shares an indoor pool with the city. It gets a lot of use by the school during the day, and is available to city people during evenings, weekends, and holidays.)

      There are sweet spots in terms of efficiency in running a school. The first one is where you have 1 class of each grade. Less than this, teacher's salaries cost too much per kid.

      The second sweet spot is at about 3 classes per grade -- this allows you to start running special programs.

      At highschool it starts to make sense to have 7-8 classes per grade. This allows you to run an IB program, as well as specialized art, music, language and vocational ed programs

      Elementary schools should have under 200 kids in them.
      High schools don't need more than 5-6 hundred. This is not a contradiction to the above. Read on to see how it can work:

      My local city, Edmonton, has a moderately clever school board. (Mark Twain comments that God first made an idiot for practice, then created a school board) In Edmonton, parents can choose to send their kid to any school in the system. Bus transport is only provided to the nearest school, but the transit dept has super deals for students on the city bus system. If you're willing to spend the time on the bus you can go to the school on the opposite corner of the city.

      Schools are funded on the students they teach. So they specialize. There are now a raft of special interest schools including an armed forces cadet school, a girls only school, several aboriginal schools that teach Cree as a second language, a bunch of other unusual language schools, a performing arts school aka Fame! several varieties of sports oriented schools, academic emphasis schools with no sports program. Back to basic schools. Montessori schools. Because the province gives extra money for kids with special needs, there are schools that concentrate on these kids too.

      As to the original poster:

      1. Get the kid an appropraite cell phone, code in the numbers she needs to use, and teach her to use it.
      2. In her book bag put a card with her name, your name and full contact info. Write it on a label on her lunch box too.
      3. Teach her responses to "I'm lost" Practice this -- make a game out of it. Re-practice it every few months. Such training should include:
          * What are safe places? (Convenience store, block parent sign, library, police station.
          * What are safe people? (Policemen, women clerks (yes I'm being sexist -- most pedophiles are men) information booths, bus drivers.
          * Places to stay away from. (dark places, lonely places)
          * Places to wait: (Under a security camera -- well lit store entrances...)
          Then she phones you. Practice this first in a grocery store. Send her for the the yoghurt while you are picking up lemons. Get her used to doing things on her own, getting lost, and figuring it out. Get her used to making a mental map. Teach her names for sections of the store.
            When she's good at the grocery store bit, expand it to the department store.
            When she's a suitable age, get connected with the local orienteering club. Their bottom level courses are suitable for 8 year olds, but I've seen 12 year olds do the adult courses. This also will enhance her spacial relations skills.
      4. Do get the GPS feature for her phone, and do figure out how to use it. A frightened kid may not be able to give a good description of where she is, and knowing within a few blocks can make all the difference. But use this as a reactive measure, not a proactive measure.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    334. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Let's not overthink this. The other part of the deal is that she gets her own phone/PDA, something I'm not required to provide and most of her friends don't have. Make no mistake, I am the parent, and she is the child. It's not a transaction between two consenting adults.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    335. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      I can see cause for confusion. All cheese wagons are the same colour, and it's not like they are as different as a subaru and an F150. All it would take would be for a dislexic kid and similarly gifted superviser to read 113 and think 131.

      As a kid in a rural town, about 3/4 oft he students bussed.
      One of the things they did to make it harder for kids to get on the wrong bus was that each bus was named after a cartoon character. 6" white letters on the front bumper. Remembering Wily Coyote was easier than route 113.

      Another factor was that there was room for all the busses to stop at once, and they were there when school got out. Every bus had a designated spot. So you had consistency of location too.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    336. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by whopis · · Score: 3, Funny

      A child is about a 1,000 times more likely to be killed by drowning in a neighbor's pool than abducted by a total stranger. 10,000 times more likely to be seriously injured or even killed playing school sports. And 100 times more likely to be struck by lightning.

      Parents need to stop watching CSI and Criminal Minds and Law & Order.

      Ok, fine...

      So build the tracking device with proper flotation devices, padding, and a lightning rod with good grounding then the problem's solved.

      Not so hard to figure out.

    337. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by lgw · · Score: 1

      Wow, I was pretty close: 115 children abducted by strangers vs 70-80 lighting deaths per year.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    338. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's battered you insensitive clod! though some might view it as a comically ironic typo

    339. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by benengr · · Score: 1

      I'm certainly more guarded my first day at a job as I don't know the people, personalities, etc. And how do you expect a 4 year old to learn Portuguese for a vacation...

      All in all, I would say it's a massively stupid idea to leave a 4 year old unattended and outside of immediate assistance for more than a couple of minutes. Leaving one alone in an unlocked apartment is even dumber.

    340. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It was a joke.
      And your examples are not asexual reproduction.

    341. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by kshade · · Score: 1

      Let's not overthink this. The other part of the deal is that she gets her own phone/PDA, something I'm not required to provide and most of her friends don't have. Make no mistake, I am the parent, and she is the child. It's not a transaction between two consenting adults.

      But that's exactly what an oppressive government would do. They'd force you to carry around a bug and you get no say in it. They might tell you it's for your own good and whatnot but you probably wouldn't believe what they say. One can't force someone to trust one, especially not ones own child.

      Also, this is a very serious invasion of privacy, something even children are entitled to. They might not rebel if they're 8 because they don't understand whats happening, but later they will, especially if the parent abuses the tracking system.

    342. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Jens+Egon · · Score: 1

      But it is rather cool!

    343. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      This assumes a competent bus driver.

      Admittedly at the beginning of the school year it's difficult, but usually a regular route driver learns what kids are supposed to be on their bus.

      Similarly, a kid SHOULD know if they're on the correct route, BUT the OP claims this problem happened after only 2-3 days - not enough time for a little kid to learn the "proper" route and know when something is wrong.

      So at least in theory the chances of this problem reoccurring should go WAY down as the school year progresses.

      The problem is substitute drivers. Often they're incompetent and don't know the route, and at least in my experience back in high school, they oddly seemed to rarely know much English (whereas the regular drivers were all native English speakers - why it is I have no clue, or maybe it's just the memories of one particular non-English-speaking substitute driver sticking in my mind in particular.)

      At one point my bus route had a substitute driver named Aziz for a few days (yes, over fifteen years later and I STILL remember the guy's name). He would frequently make wrong turns and miss stops. At one point he blew right by my street without stopping - the bus was supposed to turn up the street! He completely ignored all the students' requests to stop and start following the correct route (we weren't the only ones whose stop he screwed up on). Eventually with the bus getting farther and farther from our houses, we got off before things got worse. We wound up walking with backpacks full of books over a mile back to our homes.

      This was well before cell phones were common and the area we were dropped off in was sparsely populated, so calling home was not an option.

      For the original poster - even a cell phone so the child can call home may be enough. I don't know the details, but there are special cell phones for child safety that are preprogrammed with only a small handful of numbers. This allows a child to call home without a risk of them racking up lots of airtime charges on the phone.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    344. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not realy the point, the point being that any unfamiliar environment is dangerous, on the grounds that you aren't familiar with it.

      So you consider your first day at a new job dangerous because it's an unfamiliar environment?

      WTF, an adult at work vs. a child alone in a foreign country? Yeah, they're exactly the same, douche.

    345. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this technology:

      A quarter taped to a notecard with your phonenumber on it. Best of all, the device boots instantaneously and never needs to be plugged in.

    346. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You post is full of so much fail. It's a joke, get over your self-appreciated knowledge.

    347. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      I don't see this as something that wrong, given statistics that a shocking high percentage of DNA tests show that the "dads" are not really related to their children. If you are going to be as invested in your child as you should, you have the right to be sure it's really yours. And don't reply me with the "it shouldn't be your wire it you don't trust her". That argument is crap, there is a difference between trust based on knowledge and blind trust.

    348. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      It's still a strawman to say that keeping children under the watch of their parents leads to Orwellian governments keeping overbearing watch over its people. You obviously haven't spent thousands of hours taking care of children, or you would know that they have no privacy and have no expectation of privacy. They don't develop the psychological yearning for it until adolescence. (Or, at the very earliest, until they get report cards)

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    349. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by atamido · · Score: 1

      Calm down, the guy just wants a GPS tracker in case his kid gets misplaced *again*. Although, about 1 in 10,000 of persons under 18 go permanently missing every year in the US. In the context of a family matter, having better last known coordinates of a child would probably be a good thing for parents.

    350. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the wavefunction is interpreted as a probability amplitude, and must be squared to be interpreted as a probability. so the coefficient of each of the two states is (1/sqrt(2)) = 0.707...

      | cat > = 0.707 | living cat > + 0.707 | dead cat >

        which when squared is (1/sqrt(2))^2 = 0.5 = 50%. i won't bother trying to type out the rest of the math because my wavefunctions are being interpreted as html tags. unfortunately, i'm having a hard time finding a good analysis of this online...

      but actually, that is somewhat unnecessary when it comes to your sig because you've confused the probability with the observable itself. yes, there was only one cat, but quantum mechanics reasoning says that there's a 50% chance of being found in either state, for a 100% total chance of being found.

      your statement is like saying there's a 100% chance of being alive, and 100% chance of being dead, for a total of 100% chance, a statement which is "unnormalized." this means that you need to divide the left hand side of the equation by whatever constant is necessary so that the terms add up to 1.

    351. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but thousands have horrible unspeakable things done to them every year as well when they were supposed to be safely in school, at a friends ect. With the population density being what it is and the lack of social controls in the states a little paranoia is in order. In my mind one child brutalized per million is still a significant figure, and if you'll pardon the self interest especially if there is a chance that one could be my child.

    352. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by atamido · · Score: 1

      First, you could have the application only check GPS once every 10 or 20 minutes. Second, I had a roommate that did just this to his own car as a school project and put it under the hood, wired to the car battery. He used a pre-paid cell phone so there was no monthly charge. The cell would check the GPS and send an update to a website once every half hour. If his car were ever stolen, he could go to the site and see where his car was to report to the police.

    353. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safety pins are a dangerous weapon...

    354. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Seriously???

      Sorry, who are you to tell him how to parent his child? I disagree with him, too, but that doesn't mean I should tell him how he should be parenting his own child.

    355. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Please include statistics on how often this worst case scenario that happens more often than we realize actually happens. In the meanwhile, thanks for fearmongering and thinking of the children.

    356. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    357. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Viperpete · · Score: 1

      Duh-boy, cue debates on how much surveillance for your child is really necessary.

      I'd say just let him be a parent and decide what's necessary. He knows his daughter better than we all do.

      -- ...in bed

      Your comment read with your signature is REALLY creepy.

      --
      loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
    358. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Usually it's kids that make this argument, or idealistic single twenty-somethings who haven't thought through all the implications of parenting. It didn't wash when I first heard it in high school debates, and it still doesn't.

      It's invalid to compare government to parenting. The government is not my parent, does not (or should not) have the same responsibilities as a parent, and in any case can not (or should not) exhibit parental controls over citizens of age. The government is also not my child's parent, and does not (or should not) have parental responsibilities unless I abdicate same. (And there should be penalties if I do that.)

      Children do not have the same rights and responsibilities as adults. We could argue whether they should or not, but the fact is, they don't. As the adult I'm responsible for her actions, and to a certain extent that gives me more rights than she has. Again, you can argue whether this should be or not, it remains a fact. If she gets in trouble the authorities are going to... say it with me... hold me responsible. The moment she becomes of age, and becomes responsible for her own actions, the rules change. When she moves out, she's pretty much on her own. At that point, I can advise and assist, but not control.

      That said, we maintain open communication and a high degree of mutual trust. The other day she surprised me by saying that she had never smoked or tried recreational drugs or had sex because I had not specifically forbidden her from doing these things. Instead, I tried to present realistic risks (which aren't necessarily the same risks taught in school) and that was enough for her. She says her friends who smoke do so because their parents had slammed the rule into place with no discussion and no explanation -- which reminds me more of government than parenting.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    359. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but as a four year old I needed SOME privacy. I was able to get it, and it is not the same as neglect at all. (Granted, I don't have specific memories of needing privacy as a five year old. But I still doubt your assertion.)

      It's possible that a one or two year old has no need for privacy, but that's not the way I'd place a bet. Their need is considerably smaller, but I believe that it still exists.

      As a four year old, I achieved privacy by climbing up in an apple tree and staying there for ??? some period of time, probably less than an hour, but whatever felt right. This is an escape that isn't usually available these days.

      Privacy and neglect are almost orthogonal. One can easily have both neglect and lack of privacy. One can also easily have both privacy and lack of neglect. Privacy and neglect is trivial. The final quadrant is a bit more difficult, but also happens, when the parents are sufficiently neurotic.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    360. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > It's irrelevant because they most likely won't have the money to hit a payphone or the knowledge to reverse the charges,

      ...not to mention pay phones are getting pretty rare these days.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    361. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by dlelash · · Score: 1

      (I'm not suggesting beating your child with a stick mind you).

      ...or a carrot, for that matter.

    362. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Oh ya, I forgot.

          But, they'll still allow sharpened pencils, and 50+ pound bags. I love their idea of security and protection. I could (and even in high school) swing my book bag and knock someone out cold. Which is more dangerous, a little metal stick, or a 50 pound blunt trauma to the head? :) The only thing I was ever stabbed with in school was a pencil. One of the bully kids decided to mess with me, so he shoved his desk against mine, which had me trapped between him and a file cabinet. He stabbed me, and since I was now braced against the wall (through the file cabinet), I was able to shove him and his desk half way across the room. By the time anyone reacted to it, he was sitting at his desk (now in the middle of a bunch of empty desks all pushed out of order) stunned, with a bloody pencil in his hand. I was silent, with my hand over the stab wound, looking straight forward at the movie the teacher was showing, like nothing had ever happened.

          Funny thing about bullies. They like to mess with the quiet kids. When the quiet kids fight back and win in the incident, they stop being bullies. It wasn't a "and we became friends and lived happily ever after" story. He knew (and passed the word) to keep your distance from me. Not only can I take a pencil stabbed in my arm, but I'm strong enough to shove a bigger kid and his desk, half way across a room. :)

          When I changed schools, not too long after that (coincidentally), I kinda accidentally started a little trouble with one of the toughest kids in school. We both laughed about it, and became friends. I never had any trouble with people picking on me at that school.

          So, who needs an evil miniature sharp object. We have pencils and brute force. :) I guess those are two things they can't take away though.

          When I fly, I'm satisfied in the fact that I have my laptop. If someone tries to do something bad, smashing them in the head with the edge of the laptop is more effective than almost anything I could carry onboard that's on the banned list.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    363. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Do schools commonly mix up bus numbers and drivers so that students have different buses/drivers every day?

      From the summary:

      By the school district's own admission it has a recurring problem of placing children on the wrong buses.

      So yes. It happen at my kid's school too. We live a block from the school and my kids walk so it hasn't been an issue for us.

      When a parent isn't vigilant and something happens to the kids we blame the parent. Here, the school is not vigilant and the parent is trying to make up for it and some many are blaming the parent for being too vigilant. The kids has to go to school. The parent probably doesn't have much choice where to send the child. Hearing how rare the problem if lost kids is in the world doesn't help him if he's in a district where it happens repeatedly.

    364. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carrot is a metaphor. But I know you were just being pedantic or contrary, or making a poor joke.

    365. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      ... which is why it's a joke, and a silly tagline. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    366. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmm. Ok.

      I wouldn't even call it a statistics game. Child abductors are almost always related to the child in some way.

      I'm picturing an evil version of myself. Oh look! A lost kid walking by. There there. Everything will be ok. Tell me about your Dad and we'll find him together. Oh. He's rich hun? So... Maybe he has 100 000 dollars in liquid cash in his bank account?

      I suppose I could try holding you for ransom given that you're so clever as to know your phone number and address. Of course, then the entire city police force + 5000 volunteers would be looking for me. That doesn't give me great odds of getting away with the crime. And it's not like your dad can just withdraw that kind of money from the bank. I'd likely get a few thousand dollars at best plus maybe a diamond and some gold.


      Nah. I'll just steal ten laptops from the university library and make the same amount of money.
      Hmm. Well I've concluded that the evil but non-crazy version of myself wouldn't bother. But I don't know that the evil AND crazy version would do. I don't see him around much.

    367. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Liath · · Score: 1

      whoooooooooooooosh (is there an achievement for this?)

    368. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Shooter28 · · Score: 1

      Duh-boy, cue debates on how much surveillance for your child is really necessary.

      I'd say just let him be a parent and decide what's necessary. He knows his daughter better than we all do.

      Please disable your sig next time you make a post like that....

    369. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by BlueNoteMKVI · · Score: 1
      My wife taught elementary school for many years. It was all too common that kids would get "lost" in the bus system.

      Consider:
      • you're dealing with kids as young as 4
      • the child's classroom teacher may or may not be the one to take the child to the bus. Teachers generally divide up the duties, one will take bus kids to the bus lane, another takes kids to the parent pickup lane, another takes kids to the side door if they're walking home. Especially with a new batch of kids it's hard to keep up with who's who.
      • dismissal is a circus
      • bus drivers take days off
      • buses break down, are gone on field trips, etc so it's not always the same bus
      • kids don't pay attention - if the bus changes and they announce it over the PA, the kid will forget by the time he gets outside
      • kids lie - "my mommy said to go home with Johnny today!"
      • parents change how their kid gets home - maybe yesterday Mom picked him up, today she has to work late so he rides the bus, tomorrow he IS going home with Johnny
      • you're dealing with kids as young as 4

      Especially at the start of the school year, this is not at all uncommon. Parents panic, and justifiably so, but the kid is usually found pretty quick when the bus driver finds an extra child on the bus at the end of the route. I wouldn't say it's an everyday occurrence but definitely a few times each year.

    370. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by BlueNoteMKVI · · Score: 1

      This story seems to imply that the "man in a white van" was some pedophile or serial killer or whatever.

      But there is a 99% or more chance that in fact he was the kid's father, or uncle or something, and that this incident was related to some family drama about child custody or the like.

      True, but there's a 99% chance if the mysterious man WAS in fact a relative, he did not have the legal right to take the child. If he DID have the right, and he knew where the child was, there would have been no need to pull up in a van and kidnap the kid when he could have had the courts/police do the same thing.

      Yes, I'm aware that our legal system is messed up and takes forever to process such things. However, since we're talking made-up statistics, there's a 99% chance that the man would still face significant consequences for his actions even if he was simply taking the law into his own hands to take the kid back while the police muddled through the paperwork and red tape.

    371. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      You sneak up on the point then just go whizzing by it!

      Unless you live in a high-density area, it's not reasonable for most kids to walk to school. In the one mile between my house and the nearest major road, I will pass about 8 houses! I drive my son about 1/2 mile to the school bus stop each morning. The actual school is about 12 miles away. Unless you wanted a local school to have only about 20 students, walking an average of a mile each way, there is no way that would work in my area, or in most areas of this state.

      We don't all live in San Francisco or NYC!

    372. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could work! Of course, it should be e-ink, not low-tech paper. And there should be an e-stylus to update the data in case of a name change or bus route change. And the reader needs to be hack-proof so someone doesn't change you kid's name or bus number without authorization. I can design that for you for a unit retail price of about $400 each.

    373. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      It's still a strawman to say that keeping children under the watch of their parents leads to Orwellian governments keeping overbearing watch over its people.

      Yes, but once again, that's a strawman you've created.

      The original poster never said that monitoring children would lead to any government actions whatsoever. He simply referred to it as "Big-Brother-like monitoring", which (1) is accurate and (2) you apparently agreed with, since you used the same phrase yourself when you advocated it: "If you're not Big-Brother-like monitoring your kid, you're not a parent."

      You obviously haven't spent thousands of hours taking care of children, or you would know that they have no privacy and have no expectation of privacy.

      They only "have no privacy" if you deny them privacy. And what a shock, they don't expect privacy if no one ever gives them privacy. Do people only deserve rights if they ask for them? Is that how it works now? Good thing you're not a judge, because I'd hate to see how you interpret the 4th Amendment.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    374. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reads like those "chain-letter" comments on youtube, yet those don't advertise a company's product.

    375. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Children are NOT adults. It's dangerous to treat them as such.

      And quit building up so many strawmen, you're embarassing yourself.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    376. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by tenco · · Score: 1

      He/She claimed that any unfamiliar environment is dangerous. Learn to read.

    377. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      And quit building up so many strawmen, you're embarassing yourself.

      Thanks for your concern. I'll return the favor: you might want to look up what the term "strawman" means before using it again.

      You've repeatedly accused me of something which you have actually done in every post here; it pains me to see you digging yourself deeper into that hole. Just looking out for you, buddy!

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    378. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      They only "have no privacy" if you deny them privacy. And what a shock, they don't expect privacy if no one ever gives them privacy. Do people only deserve rights if they ask for them? Is that how it works now? Good thing you're not a judge, because I'd hate to see how you interpret the 4th Amendment.

      This is a textbook example of a strawman. I make a statement that says children have no privacy or expectation of privacy like adolescents or adults do, and you extrapolate that to mean that I advocate the idea that government should not allow any human being the rights to their privacy.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    379. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      This is a textbook example of a strawman. I make a statement that says children have no privacy or expectation of privacy like adolescents or adults do, and you extrapolate that to mean that I advocate the idea that government should not allow any human being the rights to their privacy.

      No, that's not what I extrapolated. Once again, you're building your own strawman while accusing me of doing the same.

      You wrote that children have no privacy, no expectation of privacy, and no psychological yearning for privacy. I assumed, reasonably I think, that you intended a connection between those statements, that you aren't in the habit of posting non sequiturs. Perhaps I was wrong, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

      If those statements are indeed connected, and consistent with what you've stated previously, the connection must be that children have no privacy and that's proper because they have no expectation or yearning for it (after all, you haven't given anything else that resembles a reason). And that's what led me to wonder if you only assign rights to people who ask for them.

      You then took my comment and imagined that I had accused you of advocating "the idea that government should not allow any human being the rights to their privacy." That is not what I said and certainly not what I meant, but it is awfully similar to another strawman you posted earlier, when you claimed someone had said that "keeping children under the watch of their parents leads to Orwellian governments keeping overbearing watch over its people".

      The reason I'd hate to see how you interpret the 4th Amendment is that I suspect you'd rule in favor of any search where the defendant didn't explicitly request to be left alone, just like you seem to be arguing that children shouldn't have privacy because they don't expect it or yearn for it. (Go ahead, read my comment again, and see if the clue "Do people only deserve rights if they ask for them?" helps you understand it a little better this time.)

      Hope that's cleared up now. And, since I'm still concerned about you embarrassing yourself by constantly attacking arguments that no one has raised, I hope you'll take some time away from picking at the mote in my eye to deal with the plank in your own.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    380. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Hmm..."I" knew enough to get home. Yes..I've been lost due to something like this too as a kid. It was a long time ago, but, I think I found a store, borrowed the phone to call my parents. I was about 9-10 at the time I think.

      9-10 is realistically quite a bit older then 5 and 6 in which I was mentioning. You certainly should be able to address the situation and come to a conclusion at that age. However, with a 6 year old, would you trust them crossing the busiest street in your town unsupervised? Would you rely on a 5-7 year old to wake you up from your nap in an hour or you will lose your job? I would say it depends on the kid but in general, no to both questions. I asked those questions because that is something you could reasonably assume a 9-10 year old could handle. The similarities is in the wherewithal the kid will have when stranded alone in an unfamiliar place. Parent tell their kids, if they get separates, go to the front of the store and ask someone wearing a shirt like that one to help you, yet almost every day or close to it, someone somewhere finds a kid in a corner or under a cloths rack of a stare crying because when they realize they were alone and separated, even though they have been to the store many times and are familiar with it, when they ignore what they were told and realize they can't find mommy or daddy, the break down. It's inherent to some degree.

      It isn't rocket science...I didn't grow up super sheltered, so there was no need to panic or fear in me. Unless you are raised to panic and be scared of everything, when a situation presents itself, you're not likely to freak out, IMHO.

      Your talking about an entirely different age group here. At 9-10 years old, you are pretty much responsible enough to not lose a cell phone, or the key to your bike lock, or whatever. But what is even worse, even if the kid does know what to do, the parrent can't be sure they will do it because kids that young (5 and 6 years old) aren't normally left to fend for themselves. At 9-10 years old, you are less then 3 years away from being able to legally babysit the first grader getting lost in most areas (12 years old in mine). But you have to remember, at 9-10 years old, you were most likely in 4th or 5th grade, that means there are at least 4 grade younger then you (k-3) who will not have the understanding and knowledge that you had.

      Heck I was used to being on my own...when Mom took me to the big shopping malls in Dallas when growing up...I'd say I'd meet her at "X" at a set time...and off I'd go on my own around the mall, looking at the skateboard shop, reading books in the book stores, toy stores...etc

      I don't think your putting things into the proper perspective. If you were reading books in the book store, your probably either quite a bit older then the kindergartner, first, or second grader who is still learning the alphabet and how to read words larger then 2 syllables, or you are unique and was advanced for your age and your experience doesn't really apply to the rest of the world.

      I was used to be let on my own at a fairly young age. The meet times were pretty short when young, but, as I got older and more trustworthy, we'd sometimes split most all day, and even if I wanted to find her early, I knew mostly which stores and which departments she'd be in if I wanted to find her.

      The only age you have given is almost twice as old as the youngest who could be lost by the schools. It's all fine and all if you roamed free at 4 and five years old, most likely you were under someone's supervision at that age, even if it wasn't your parents. When you are older, I totally agree, but I would consider it child endangerment if someone was letting a 5 year old wonder around unsupervised at a mall running from shop to shop for hours on end. A 5 year old who would be in school, does not posses the pr

    381. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I dunno.

      As for the younger years...I walked to school 1-4th grade. It was about 2 blocks or so from home.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    382. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't think treating someone like an ass without them knowing it wasn't a joke either?

      Why else do you think I would use ass instead of donkey?

      Hey, you want a carrot?

    383. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, as I mentioned, I walked to school a year earlier without a parent too. Of course I was with other people and the grade schools, even to this day still have crossing guards. But we are forgetting that we had several advantages. One is that we lived within walking distance to school, many people don't and their 5 or 6 year olds have to ride the bus. Two, we knew where we were at and where to get help is needed. We weren't far from home which both aided in our comfort as well as our parents, and finally, there was a point of destination that we actually arrived at. Imagine your parent's state of mind if the school called them a half hour after you should have been there asking why you weren't at school. Now imagine the state of mind when the bus shows up, your only 6, and your not on it. When they call the school thinking maybe you missed the bus to tell them they are on your way to pick you up to find out that none of the students are left at the school.

      We should also not forget that the reasoning behind this isn't because the guy doesn't trust the kid to go outside and play. This isn't a normal situation where everything is as it should be. This is a situation where the plan failed. And worse, the failure was outside his control. Imagine that you had kids that age (5-6). Now imagine that you left them in my care and when you came back, I had absolutely no clue whatsoever at all where your kid was, who he was with, what he was doing, if he was alright, hurt, sick, being molested, or anything. We have to spend an hour or so looking for him. Now would you be questioning my ability to keep your kids safe and consider never leaving him with me again? I would hope so, but what do you do when I am the school and you are compelled by law to give your kid to me for 5 days a week. What would you do?

    384. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget this is his daughter a little girl. Not a boy like you. Little boys are much safer on the streets around strangers.

    385. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      By that logic, who are you to tell me I can't give advice?

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    386. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by nasor · · Score: 1

      This is the worst case scenario and it happens more than people without children realize.

      No, actually, it doesn't. On average there are about 100-150 children kidnapped by strangers each year in the US, out of a population of about 75 million children. For comparison, there are about 2500 children killed in car accidents each year. Your child is statistically about 20 times more likely to die in a traffic accident while you are driving him to or from school than to be abducted while walking to or from school.

    387. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      "Holy crap- you are, what we in the biz call, an over-reacting parent" isn't advice

    388. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      Who are you to determine what's advice and what's not?

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    389. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Brilliant argument, sir.

    390. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by razholio · · Score: 1

      I love all the spur-of-the-moment-statisticians come outta the woodwork when someone suggests being a little over-protective of their children. Yes, you and your 'n' of 1, with a statistical significance of absolute '0' will provide all the insight anyone will ever need. 'back when I was a kid... and I turned out just fine!' damn, it must be true!

      Fact is, there are three things you need to balance here, not just the probability of something bad(TM) happening:
      1. probability of bad thing happening
      2. morbidity/mortality of said bad thing (a badness factor, say)
      3. the cost of providing various levels of protection against said badness.

      I can't prevent all possible bad outcomes from driving a car, but I'm willing to spend a certain amount of money to limit the badness of driving myself and my kids in my car. I pay for a safe car, snow tires, car seats, etc. and I make sure we always wear our seatbelts. Also, I don't drive like an asshole.

    391. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Forget your pills or something?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    392. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      We could keep going- but unfortunately this philosophy stuff makes me get depressed. :p

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    393. Re:Holy Crap! Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok. my only point is that as someone who's taken (several, and TA'd) QM classes, i concluded that you don't understand how it works. not that i understand it either, but at least i understand how the math works...

      but it's pointless to argue about what's funny, so you win!! :-P

  2. Cell phone by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Buy your daughter a cellphone and have her use Google Latitude? Set up speed dial to call you, your wife, etc.? Just kicking ideas around...

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    1. Re:Cell phone by vix86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. You don't even need Google Latitude. Just get her a small cheap phone and teach her how to use it. If she gets lost due to the school or her own demise, she can call and say where she is.

      It seems more beneficial to a child to be able to learn how to read street signs and give directions to themselves, instead of relying on technology and parents to find them.

    2. Re:Cell phone by coolgrafix · · Score: 1

      I don't think the OP mentioned a power supply criteria, but the cellphone solutions mentioned here all require a frequently-charged battery. What low-power options exist?

    3. Re:Cell phone by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. Cheap insurance. You can even get a pre-paid plan so that said daughter isn't spending way too many hours talking to girlfriends. I have a buddy who utilizes the cell phone for his (17YO) daughter. He's had occasion to need to locate her after she's driven off with friends.

      "You are at the store with Denise? Then how come your cell phone puts you across town near Roger's house?"

    4. Re:Cell phone by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the OP mentioned a power supply criteria, but the cellphone solutions mentioned here all require a frequently-charged battery. What low-power options exist?

      A cellphone that is only turned on for emergency calls. The phone in the glove compartment of my car works easily for three months, probably more, without a charge. Of course that is because I only turn it on when I want to make a call. But if they child only uses the phone when the teachers put her on the wrong bus, the battery should last quite long.

    5. Re:Cell phone by Thornburg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just get her a small cheap phone and teach her how to use it. If she gets lost due to the school or her own demise, she can call and say where she is.

      Wow, which carriers have coverage in Purgatory?

    6. Re:Cell phone by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      If she gets lost due to the school or her own demise, she can call and say where she is.

      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      Either that or your phone company has a much better roaming agreement than mine does.

    7. Re:Cell phone by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I doubt even chatting with her friends will be a problem. Judging by the original poster, she sounds rather young, before the chatting with your friends into the evening type.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    8. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the support is hell. Helldesk operators...

    9. Re:Cell phone by Xanthvar · · Score: 1

      This is probably your most feasible solution. A cell phone is going to be able to accomplish most of these items, without being a giant brick.

      Sprint ( I do not work for them, but do use them), has a service that works like this:
      http://www.nextel.com/en/services/gps/family_locator.shtml

      And I am sure that others do as well. I think the one saving grace about this, is that it sends a text message when it "locates" a person, so they know, that you know, where they are.

      I am probably going to start using a service like this once my son gets older, just because of the peace of mind of "yes, I do know where my kid is at 2 in the morning".

      The thing that I am having issues with is:

      A. What age to I get it for him?

      B. Will this conflict with school policy? Ideally, the phone will be in silent mode during the school day, and my son will have enough discipline to not get himself in trouble with it, and have it confiscated as a result.

      Good luck

    10. Re:Cell phone by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      B. Will this conflict with school policy? Ideally, the phone will be in silent mode during the school day, and my son will have enough discipline to not get himself in trouble with it, and have it confiscated as a result.

      Good luck

      Most school policies ban all cellphones. You're supposed to keep them in your locker, which I wouldn't do. I had a smartphone as a part of my internship from High School, I wasn't going to risk losing or getting it stolen. I kept it in my pocket at all times on silent, not even vibrate. I never had any problems. I would only take it out to check the time, nothing more.

      I ended up having more trouble with a stupid teacher taking away my laptop because she thought that Packet Tracer was a game.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    11. Re:Cell phone by dietdew7 · · Score: 1

      I think AT&T has service in hell. At least that's where their customer service is located.

    12. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just get her a small cheap phone and teach her how to use it. If she gets lost due to the school or her own demise, she can call and say where she is.

      Wow, which carriers have coverage in Purgatory?

      NSAT&T.

    13. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also good for sexting when she's finally 13.^H^H16^H^H18!

    14. Re:Cell phone by Xerolooper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just get her a small cheap phone and teach her how to use it. If she gets lost due to the school or her own demise, she can call and say where she is.

      Wow, which carriers have coverage in Purgatory?

      All of them, that is where their customer service is located.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    15. Re:Cell phone by vintagepc · · Score: 1

      I think the one saving grace about this, is that it sends a text message when it "locates" a person, so they know, that you know, where they are.

      So you have time to come up with an explanation for your whereabouts?

      --
      Evolution - Est. 4500000000 B.C. Don't piss in the gene pool.
    16. Re:Cell phone by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Signing up with AT&T IS purgatory.

      --
      No sig today...
    17. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of them, I think; IIRC, they've set up deals with the owner of the place.

    18. Re:Cell phone by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's called the firefly a tiny phone with only 2 buttons.

      Call mommy
      Call Daddy

      Works great. and will be fine for the easy to freak out parent. 98% of all children survive without one, but if you are easy to wig out and freak out, it's a great tool.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Cell phone by berashith · · Score: 1

      I dont want to think at all about people sexting at 118 !

    20. Re:Cell phone by maxume · · Score: 1

      He could ziptie her to a chair in the basement, then the knowing where she was wouldn't be a problem.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    21. Re:Cell phone by icebike · · Score: 1

      Why is low power important when it comes to protecting a first grader?

      Really, get over it and plug the damn thing in every other day.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    22. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, which carriers have coverage in Purgatory?

      All of them, they're all based just a little south.

    23. Re:Cell phone by Stile+65 · · Score: 1

      I lived in London, KY for a few months. That's where Sprint Wireless billing and customer service is located. That town really is hell.

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    24. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people like you are the ones training the current generation to accept police state electronic surveillance..and for what? to control a teen's sex life? pathetic.

    25. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So *thats* what the guy from at&t meant when i complained about shitty roaming: "Go to hell!"...

    26. Re:Cell phone by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 1

      I've heard people refer to Verizon as the phone company from hell...

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    27. Re:Cell phone by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      The US doesn't have UMTS videophones yet?

    28. Re:Cell phone by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      Heh - that's nothing compared to the GPS-enabled cell phones I setup at my previous job. They had each employee tracked as to when they logged in, where they went, and when they went home.

      http://www.perfectreign.com/stuff/gps/

      The cool thing was that a given employee could always turn the phone off and also didn't necessarily need to report to the office to "clock in" as it could be done remotely. This works really well for the maintenance and engineering folks who spent most of their time in the field.

    29. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, which carriers have coverage in Purgatory?

      AT&T, judging by the number of iPhone users complaining their service has gone to hell in a handbasket. Indeed, many would argue their coverage is purgatory.

    30. Re:Cell phone by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      I'll have to agree with cell phones. I normally wouldn't advocate giving one to a kid, but if you're worried about her getting lost, it's probably the best solution. Sure, you *could* inject a GPS device in her... but seriously? You'd inject a computer that broadcasts her position when there was another solution? No, pick up a cheap cell phone and teach her to use it. You can even have the phone company triangulate the position if she doesn't/can't call for some reason. A cell phone isn't "perfect" in that she could lose it or have it taken from her, but it's not an invasion of privacy nearly as much as clapping a tracking chip on her like an animal in a wildlife show... Teach her her address, phone number, 911, and such, and then put them all in her phone anyway. Also, maybe teach her which bus to get on? I'm assuming your school system has the same kids on the same bus every day, which I guess might be unmerited but every such system I've seen has had at least consistent numbering...

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    31. Re:Cell phone by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Your friend is a terrible parent. Sneaking away from parents is part of growing up.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    32. Re:Cell phone by vix86 · · Score: 1

      Haha, very true. I was aiming for a word meaning "her own fault."

    33. Re:Cell phone by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps some variant of "left to her own devices".

    34. Re:Cell phone by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      It is insane that people are OK with sending their kids off with adults who have a rule that they cannot be in contact with their parents.

    35. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarantee you that their customer service centers are not in Purgatory. After a few thousand years, you can work your way up out of Purgatory.

    36. Re:Cell phone by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      I ended up having more trouble with a stupid teacher taking away my laptop because she thought that Packet Tracer [cisco.com] was a game.

      It isn't?

    37. Re:Cell phone by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

      And that's the kinda creepy stalkerish behaviour that the earlier threads were against.

    38. Re:Cell phone by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      As far as i know all of them coverage in Newark NJ

    39. Re:Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! I knew it started with a "d." Not even 30 and already I'm losing my vocabulary.

  3. Easiest solution is to go with Lojack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Police and insurance companies are familiar with the operation of these units. And a few brackets will easily and securely mount the unit to your daughter's undercarriage.

    1. Re:Easiest solution is to go with Lojack by Itninja · · Score: 1

      But the GPS needs a view of the sky to get a consistent signal. Best place to discreetly mount would be inside the car, near the rear window.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    2. Re:Easiest solution is to go with Lojack by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      And remember to check the battery periodically. Both the one in the vehicle, and the standby one on the LoJack system itself. You may need to provide a periodic jump start, often at early hours in the morning. As a result a good alarm clock for you might be in order.

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:Easiest solution is to go with Lojack by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Depending on her age, that might be quite entertaining.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  4. Zoomback... by chris_martin · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    -- Chris Martin, System Administrator
    1. Re:Zoomback... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Does GPS work through six feet of soil or at the bottom of a well?

      If I was a kidnapper the first thing I'd do would be to search her and throw away the stupid cell phone.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Zoomback... by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      That looks promising. Just sew it right into her backpack.

    3. Re:Zoomback... by digsbo · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, GPS will not work through six feet of soil. However, this is an A-GPS device, meaning it will work where standalone GPS won't (inside residential construction, thick forest cover). What the device can do to help find a child who's under 6ft of soil/in a well is pretty neat, though: It can be preprogrammed to send a location at regular intervals, either constantly or on a triggering event (like when it gets 250 yards from the school's lat/lon). So checking the location history via the secure web app, you can see where the breadcrumb trail ends. Disclosure: I worked on this product's server infrastructure some time ago, but am no longer affiliated with the organization.

    4. Re:Zoomback... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      That looks promising. Just sew it right into her backpack.

      ...and you'll never not know where her backpack is.

      I'm afraid the only way to be sure is to implant the device in her central nervous system. This way, if she is ever separated from it, she'll be dead...

      My youngest has autism, and I work in security, and I feel compelled to point out that there will ALWAYS be limits to any system. As a parent, you have to try and determine where those limits are, and if you can actually make things better by getting what you want. In this case, I kind of doubt it. I do wish you luck though.

    5. Re:Zoomback... by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your informative and intelligent post!

    6. Re:Zoomback... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at this too: http://www.lok8u.com/

  5. FWIW, searching Google for "subcutaneous GPS"... by kclittle · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... yields 36,9000 hits.

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
  6. Great online service by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This one seemed to work pretty well at finding my wife, anyway.

    1. Re:Great online service by sampson7 · · Score: 1

      Sir, I salute you.

    2. Re:Great online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one seemed to work pretty well at finding my wife, anyway.

      Craigslist personals are great too - that's where I found my wife!

    3. Re:Great online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that's how you found her at my house that evening? mystery solved.

    4. Re:Great online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one seemed to work pretty well at finding my wife, anyway.

      Hahahahaha, !cute. The only reason this was modded insightful is because nobody either knows about, or followed the link.

    5. Re:Great online service by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      I lolled

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    6. Re:Great online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or knew about it, and wanted to dupe people like you into following the link.

    7. Re:Great online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay there is a story behind that begging to be told.

    8. Re:Great online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one [themobiletracker.com] seemed to work pretty well at finding my wife, anyway.

      You know, I'm a little scared of that link.

      I find it terribly scary that it is possible that a public web-site can look up any cell number, even if the owner of that number has never been asked if that information could be used.

    9. Re:Great online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny.. that's where I found your wife too

    10. Re:Great online service by BGrif · · Score: 0

      Why didn't you just ask me? I would have told you where I live.

  7. Buy her a cellphone by shitzu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least in my country (Estonia) you can track any GSM cellphone's (belonging to you) location from the provider's webpage or similar.

    1. Re:Buy her a cellphone by rev_sanchez · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have another cell phone idea. Rig up the pre-paid cell phone to shoot emergency flares when the number is dialed. The wiring should be similar to the IED designs the insurgency has been using in Iraq but you'll want to substitute the bomb bit for a emergency flare. I really can't stress enough how important that last part is. Now, affix the device on some sturdy head ware. You'll probably want to base this hat on a steel wok and just add a chin strap and remove any handles. Now all you need to do is mount the device on top of the inverted wok/hat and you're all set.

      If your kid goes missing just dial the number and even if you don't see the flares I'm pretty sure someone will contact you shortly after flaming rockets erupt from your child's hat. Wrong numbers might be an issue but it's a small price to pay for safety.

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    2. Re:Buy her a cellphone by Ezrymyrh · · Score: 1

      I have another cell phone idea. Rig up the pre-paid cell phone to shoot emergency flares when the number is dialed. The wiring should be similar to the IED designs the insurgency has been using in Iraq but you'll want to substitute the bomb bit for a emergency flare. I really can't stress enough how important that last part is. Now, affix the device on some sturdy head ware. You'll probably want to base this hat on a steel wok and just add a chin strap and remove any handles. Now all you need to do is mount the device on top of the inverted wok/hat and you're all set. If your kid goes missing just dial the number and even if you don't see the flares I'm pretty sure someone will contact you shortly after flaming rockets erupt from your child's hat. Wrong numbers might be an issue but it's a small price to pay for safety.

      /snark/ Dont forget the emergency flotation devices,parachute,canoe and a 7 day supply of food... Oh and bear repellent. Subby...Fear is the folly of fools.

      --
      The love of good Whiskey,Woman,Weed is all i need.
    3. Re:Buy her a cellphone by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      That's because your entire "country" fits in my backyard and you intenetz can be DDOSed by a beowulf cluster of 386sx's. Take that NAZI LOVERS!

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    4. Re:Buy her a cellphone by shitzu · · Score: 1

      must be a russian loser

  8. Placing children on the wrong bus? by rob1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was in middle school they gave all the kids a laminated bus pass with the bus number in big block type, and had the bus numbers spray painted on the sidewalk so everyone who had to ride the bus knew exactly where to line up. Nobody ever got on the wrong bus because nobody ever got in the wrong line. So why is this a recurring problem for your daughter's school district?

    I say make them fix the problem instead of forcing you to shell out money to cover it up for them.

    1. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the first sane answer I've seen. Part of growing up is being able to make decisions on your own without a helicopter parent trying to save you with some whiz-bang technology. Kids aren't little adults, but they aren't inanimate objects either. I think it's definitely possible to teach a kid how to get on the right bus themselves.

    2. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by dedazo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah, when I was a kid they painted the bus number and route with magic marker on our foreheads. No one ever got on the wrong bus. Ever.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    3. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the time I was in grade school until I started driving, I and all my bus-riding classmates had to remember our bus number. No "bus passes", no boarding stations, etc. We would get out of class, go out to where the buses were, find the bus, and get on it.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by CraftyJack · · Score: 1

      No one ever got on the wrong bus. Ever.

      You wouldn't dare get on the wrong bus. I shudder to even think what they would have done to a kid who did that. You certainly wouldn't be seeing recess any time soon.

      I still remember my route number.

    5. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid we rode the regular city buses, never heard of any major problems with this, no huge signs, no permanent marker, no GPS locator devices.

      Parents today are overly nervous, if they are so scared of the environment in which they are bringing up their children then maybe they (and the OP) should consider moving somewhere safer?

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    6. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by northernboy · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the school *HAS* to fix this problem.

      0. IANAL. You might want to discuss some of this *with* a lawyer.

      1. School principals are "peace officers"

      2. When you deliver you child to school (in this case to the school bus that picks her up), you have transferred custody of your child to the school. The school is responsibe for the safety and well-being of all the children in their custody in a very specific and technical way under the law.

      3. When you pick up your child, the school is transferring their custody back to you. This is why you have to sign him/her out formally when something like a doctor's appointment interrupts the school day. I'm not entirely sure how the bus fits in at this end, but while on the bus, your child is still in the school's custody.

      You need to help your local 'peace officer' recognize and apply appropriate resources to solving their very real custody problem.

      IANAL. YMMV. I'm glad your particular incident ended well. But consider the public service you would be doing while helping this school to prevent a far more serious incident.

    7. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by tgd · · Score: 1

      When I was in middle school, you were expected to get on the right bus, if you were taking a bus. Other kids just walked. (Yes, even at 10-12yo). They dropped you off at one stop in a neighborhood (not in front of your house tying up traffic).

      Kids got on the wrong bus sometimes. Kids wandered off with friends. If it was the latter, you probably got an ass kickin' when you got home.

      No one talked about laminated passes, or tracking kids, or making parents meet them at bus stops or any of the other ridiculous things done these days.

      A lot of parents these days suck. celtic_hackr is one of them.

    8. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Actually I never rode a school bus... But if my school had had them, the magic marker solution would have probably crossed the feverish imagination of the evil proctors :)

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    9. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      I finished high school in the last decade and I find these things ridiculous but then again I grew up in a large city. If you couldn't make your way home from any subway station by middle school then something was wrong. So yeah, by middle school I was simply taking the subway/bus to and from school. In elementary school I was walking there by myself (it was a lot closer than my middle school) since both my parents worked. My parents did give me a cellphone at some point just in case but I don't think I ever needed to use it for that.

    10. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by egburr · · Score: 1

      When I was in middle school, the buses had a number written with a marker on a piece of paper stuck in the window by the door. There was no order to how the buses arrived. We all just milled about in the yard watching for our buses. I don't know about anyone else, but I never got on the wrong bus even once.

      Now at my kid's school, everyone form into lines, the teachers check names, and when the buses arrive the teachers escort the kids out to the correct bus. It may seem more secure, but it also seems to be a huge hassle.

      I would occasionally go home with a friend, with our parent's knowledge and concent and prior planning days before. Now, the only way that can happen is for the kids have to give the teacher a signed note from the parents, and the teacher calls the parent to confirm it. Even with all of that, a parent has to pick them up, because the kids absolutely can not get on any bus other than their assigned home bus.

      The local YMCA after school program has to have their own mini-bus to transport kids, because the school system will not let kids ride the bus that goes right by the YMCA if it's not their home bus, even though that bus is nowhere near full.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    11. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The local school district disassociated the bus route # from the bus number decades ago (Because we have more kids than busses and the busses are less than reliable). Due to issues actually having reliable drivers, sometimes two routes end up doubled up on the same bus with absolutely no predictability.

      The kludgy solution that worked... Put a spot in the window to hold a sign with the route number currently handled by the bus, and have the kid memorize that. Unfortunately, it falls to pieces when it's kindergarten students that don't know their ABCs or numbers.

    12. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by 2short · · Score: 1


      "By the school district's own admission it is a recurring problem of placing children on the wrong buses."

      Sounds to me like someone said "Sometimes kids get on the wrong bus", which is true in all school districts, and will be regardless of what you do to prevent it. You just need to make sure it get's straightened out as quickly as possible, which it sounds like it was, if not before the submitter worked himself into a froth.

    13. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Chees0rz · · Score: 1

      I really hope you don't mean middle school. I believe we did this in K-3, in my school district, in Maine... but middle school? Sheesh... i was already getting some prepubescent action at that age...

      And to add something helpful- our school also dismissed us by Bus# so there wasn't a mad rush and chaos.

    14. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by MaXintosh · · Score: 1

      From the time I was in grade school until I started driving, I and all my bus-riding classmates had to remember our bus number. No "bus passes", no boarding stations, etc. We would get out of class, go out to where the buses were, find the bus, and get on it.

      Same here. I can't remember a single time anyone ended up in the wrong place, and we managed to get home every time. 'course, some of the bus drivers were probably chronic drunks or mentally unstable in retrospect, but somehow we all managed to get home.
      I think this has a lot to do with how schools are essentially warehouses in some cities, now. When I left my hometown for life in the bigger world, I remember reading that the new highschool they were building was large enough to land a small aircraft inside. I can't imagine what that did to class-size...

    15. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by carmen2u · · Score: 1

      Brilliant solution to a simple problem. Low tech is best here.

    16. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Bonewalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I would give the same advice, let's not forget that ultimately the child's safety comes down to one or two people: the parents. They will be the ones who will suffer the most if something bad happens to their child. So, the OP doesn't trust his school system to get his daughter on the right bus and wants to take extra precautions. I don't blame him for that. Some of us would react differently, but to each his own. I would probably change school districts. If that isn't an option move to a new town or city. If that isn't an option, go to every school board meeting until everyone is aware how serious you are about your child's safety, and the other children in the district. Bad things could have happened if the daughter had been dropped off in a completely foreign location and tried to find her own home, or panicked, etc. So maybe this parent isn't so over-the-top in his decision on how to protect his child.

    17. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I finished high school in the last decade and I find these things ridiculous but then again I grew up in a large city. If you couldn't make your way home from any subway station by middle school then something was wrong.

      ANY subway station? Your city couldn't have been that large then.

    18. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Yes, any of the 400+ subway stations. I don't see why you think it'd be hard since it's the exact same method I use nowadays. Go look at subway map in station, find a route, note what to take, check for any service notices, get on subway, double check map in subway for stop to get off on, repeat till home. If the route looks particularly confusing then you can always ask someone for help. Worst case is that you waste some time backtracking if you get on the wrong train.

    19. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by DorkRawk · · Score: 1

      I remember when I was in first grade I got on the wrong bus and ended up at the bus garage at the end of the line. This was probably about 20 years ago when subdermal GPS was just a twinkle in some obsessive parent's eye. Getting a whole bunch of kids in one place is like herding LOLcats, it's tricky and children are slippery.

      You know what happened? I was confused for a while, then someone drove me back to school. I don't remember how it all played out but I must have gotten home eventually because I remember finishing 1st grad. That was it. End of story. Stuff like this happens and it's not the end of the world. And I remember it was kind of interesting as a little kid to see where all the buses when after they were done dropping kids off!

      Parents, think about the most interesting memories of your childhood. I bet a lot of them involve doing things your parents didn't know about. RAISE YOUR KIDS TO KNOW WHICH MISTAKES ARE OK TO MAKE!

    20. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the parents. They will be the ones who will suffer the most if something bad happens to their child.

      The tried-and-true tack has been to put that back on the kids. In other words: If you are caught doing something unsafe, your ass is in a world of trouble. It's amazing how effective that was at keeping most of us out of harm's way.

    21. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yes, any of the 400+ subway stations. I don't see why you think it'd be hard since it's the exact same method I use nowadays. Go look at subway map in station, find a route, note what to take, check for any service notices, get on subway, double check map in subway for stop to get off on, repeat till home. If the route looks particularly confusing then you can always ask someone for help. Worst case is that you waste some time backtracking if you get on the wrong train.

      I am a born and bred New Yorker, and I can assure you there are many areas in the city that are not served by a subway. What you described is fine for a high school student or older, but no, I don't expect a 6th grader to be able to have complete command of the public transportation system and the ability to completely understand the MTA's oftentimes cryptic service notes.

    22. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll fill in the blank because now when I look at it that does seem kind of strange -

      My middle school and an elementary school were in the same two-story building. Grades 6-8 took up half of the second floor, and K-6 got the first floor and the other half of the second floor. This was also at a military installation in Germany so turnover was insanely high and long-term familiarity with the bus system servicing the school was a pipe dream. So when bus passes got handed out, they got handed out to everyone in the building. I didn't need a bus pass to remember I rode bus 6 (yes I still remember), but the school administration preferred to play it safe rather than have a dunce get on the wrong bus and be lost in a foreign country. ;)

    23. Re:Placing children on the wrong bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely, totally, absolutely agree--you're trusting the school with your offspring. The school has shown that it's not reliable about sending her home correctly.

      Advice in two parts:

      Tell your daughter 1) you trust her judgement more than the school's (because putting a tag on her makes it seem as if she's at fault), 2) it's ok to ask the bus driver to make sure she's on the right bus, 3) if anybody--teachers, bus drivers, other kids, hall monitors--gives her any grief you are on her side and 4) your telephone numbers so that she can call anytime. . . because really, that's the relationship you want to build now, for those tough years between 12 and 22.

      Part 2: How hard is it for the school to buy some stickers, slap them on the buses, and tell the kids, "You will ALWAYS ride the Spongebob Squarepants bus to go home." Worked when I was 10 and an absentminded schoolchild. I got on the Donald Duck bus every single time! You probably aren't the only parent encountering this problem. Make the school fix it.

  9. Outsource the Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Hack an iPhone or other smart phone to act as a torrent server over 3G
    2. Fill the drive with Metallica tracks
    3. Duct tape the phone to your daughter
    4. If you need to know where she is, just ask the RIIA

    1. Re:Outsource the Problem by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Funny

      4. If you need to know where she is, just ask the RIIA

      Which, given the RIAA's investigative tactics, will yield 2 of her best friends, a teacher she had two years ago, and a random gas station attendant, but not the missing child.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    2. Re:Outsource the Problem by RagingFuryBlack · · Score: 1

      Cue Commercial:
      Yep, there's an app for that..

      --
      Warning: Corny karma killing post above.
    3. Re:Outsource the Problem by pbhj · · Score: 1

      1. Hack an iPhone or other smart phone to act as a torrent server over 3G
      2. Fill the drive with Metallica tracks
      3. Duct tape the phone to your daughter
      4. If you need to know where she is, just ask the RIIA

      The $10 Millions USD per month costs might be a bit of a struggle ...

  10. here, lmgtfy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=child+gps

  11. Drive her by MBCook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not just drive her to and from school yourself? That would provide additional time with your daughter as well.

    You wouldn't have to trust the school to not lose her on the bus system

    You don't need a subcutaneous lo-jack.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Drive her by starglider29a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True. Why use a public, already-funded, low MPG-per-rider system when EACH parent can drive their SUVs to drop the kids off? In fact, why don't you just home-school your child and save lots of resources. And if you all buy hybrids, you can save the auto industry.

      I hope I broke the needle on your sarcasm meter.

    2. Re:Drive her by that+IT+girl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize this is impossible for an increasing percentage of the population, right? Hence the existence of buses to begin with.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    3. Re:Drive her by nmrtian · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, contribute to the swirling mass of minivans in front of the school. The daughter will more likely squashed than lost!

    4. Re:Drive her by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Plus you might get a monthly check from whoever to reimburse you for not having your kid using the public school bus. At least that's how it works in New Jersey.

    5. Re:Drive her by adolf · · Score: 1

      So, that is what's wrong with Jersey.

      Thanks for the tip!

    6. Re:Drive her by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      It's Jersey. I'm sure there are a ton of other things wrong with it as well.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    7. Re:Drive her by MBCook · · Score: 1

      If you are so worried the school isn't trustworthy enough to leave you kid on the bus, what other choice do you have? I guess you could carpool.

      I don't like the public schools anyway, so I'd say home school.

      I agree he's overreacting (although I would certainly go talk to the principal asking how this happened).

      But if you want to be in that school, and not use the bus, you're only other choice is to drive unless you live pretty close to the school.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    8. Re:Drive her by MBCook · · Score: 1

      No it's not. People could move closer to schools so they could walk, or change their schedule so they could drive their kids. It's about choices and sacrifices.

      Now if your comment is "An ever increasing number of people don't want to be inconvenienced by sacrificing for their kids", that I'd agree with.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    9. Re:Drive her by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      When I was in elementary and middle school I had to walk to school because I was one of three kids in my area. The walk was a rather long one. When I got to high school which was only a half a mile away, they sent a bus.

      My Junior year of high school all the little kids in the area became school age, instantly there was buses. That really pissed me off thinking of all the cold winters I had to walk in below zero temps.

      Then I realized that I was finally old enough to tell those "when i was your age stories"!!!

    10. Re:Drive her by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Isn't New Jersey the state where the people who live there are so stupid the state doesn't trust them to pump their own gas?

      I kid, I kid!

    11. Re:Drive her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...low MPG-per-rider system...

      I do believe you mean "high MPG-per-rider system", as in "many miles per gallon", as in 50 rather than 5.

    12. Re:Drive her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then improve efficiency by driving her and the neighbors' kids too. Take turns with the other parents.

      Of course, this plan assumes we're not talking about a typical suburbanite who can't name his neighbors and never sees another soul from more than two houses away except at the yearly block party, assuming he bothers to show.

    13. Re:Drive her by jojabo · · Score: 1

      when i was a kid I had to walk 3 miles up hill to and from school.

    14. Re:Drive her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, walk her! More time together, and get her and you some (probably - this is slashdot) much needed exercise.

    15. Re:Drive her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird. You went from two extremes in your sarcasm. One using much more energy than the alternative (driving each kid to school) and one using much less (not even needing a ride to get to school).

      You did indeed break the needle on my sarcasm meter with your extreme oscillation. Thanks.

    16. Re:Drive her by rockytopchip · · Score: 1

      My wife and I in fact do home-school our kids and it is working out very well for our family. We drive an SUV to transport the kids to their various activities; karate, dance, field trips, etc.

    17. Re:Drive her by rockytopchip · · Score: 1

      No it's not. People could move closer to schools so they could walk, or change their schedule so they could drive their kids. It's about choices and sacrifices.

      Now if your comment is "An ever increasing number of people don't want to be inconvenienced by sacrificing for their kids", that I'd agree with.

      Absolutely correct, mod this up! It's all about choices and sacrifices. My wife and I chose to live on a single income and home-school our children. It's working out great for our family.

    18. Re:Drive her by celtic_hackr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't ruled out home-schooling yet.

    19. Re:Drive her by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Or make left turns.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    20. Re:Drive her by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      In what world do you live in where you can move on a whim (you know, in case the district closes the local elementary school) or dictate to your employer where you are and are not at work?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    21. Re:Drive her by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      No, that's us here in Oregon

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    22. Re:Drive her by MBCook · · Score: 1

      You don't move on a whim, you plan where you live for the future when you have kids.

      Some sacrifices have to be made ahead of time.

      Of course, you have 5-7 years between finding out you'll have a kid and when they're in school. You should be able to plan and execute a move in that much time.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    23. Re:Drive her by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      Ah, New Jersey, the No Left Turn state... Or is it the "The Sign Is After The Turn Indicated" state? Driving in NJ is a surreal experience if you're not staying on one road the whole way through.

      I've pumped my own gas driving through there. The attendant gave me a weird look. It made my day when I realized afterward what state I was in.

      Yea, offtopic, flamebait, whatever, I know. Mod away. But sometimes one just needs to vent about one's neighbor states ;-)

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    24. Re:Drive her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    25. Re:Drive her by BGrif · · Score: 0

      I hope I broke the needle on your sarcasm meter

      You did break it and now I can't fix it because I was home-schooled.

    26. Re:Drive her by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      You left off, " in the snow carrying two 10lb sacks of potatoes"

    27. Re:Drive her by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so suppose you move somewhere with a neighborhood with a great elementary school and after a year they close it? I've seen it happen.

      It's still like the lottery, only with different odds.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    28. Re:Drive her by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

    29. Re:Drive her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you walk or cycle her to and from school yourself?

      That would provide additional time with your daughter as well.

      You wouldn't have to trust the school to not lose her on the bus system

      You don't need a subcutaneous lo-jack.

    30. Re:Drive her by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      This is true, I'm so appalled at how people hardly pay any attention to their kids these days, and wonder why they have so many health and behavioral problems. One of the many reasons I'm not having any either, I honestly don't know if I could be a good enough parent and I wouldn't give a kid second best just because I selfishly 'wanted a kid'.

      But really, in this economy... changing one's schedule might be tough, and moving, even harder.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    31. Re:Drive her by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      I can't help but imagine a week long training marathon on new employees on the proper way to pump gas.

    32. Re:Drive her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drive my kid to school in the dump truck. It gets about 1 mile/gallon.

  12. GPS + SMS. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You probably don't want it continually transmitting. Easiest way would be to it respond to a 'ping'. http://www.mightygps.com/smsgps.htm looks to fit the bill perfectly. There are probably cheaper Chinese clones.

    Get it a SIM card and you'll be able to track her anywhere there's AT&T Signal (so you're equally fucked anyway). Google Maps API kicks ass. It's not hard to write some code to take that SMS and turn it into a dot on a map.
    -
    However I agree with the other posters. Your kid's fine. How many kids have they PERMANENTLY lost? So the kid gets on the wrong bus. Teach your daughter English and she should be able to find out where she is at any time.

    Reminds me of the mother who caught a ton of flack for letting her young son find his own way home (he asked to) from a big store in NYC.

    The people that want to rape and molest your daughter statistically are yourself or one of your brothers(-in-law)

    1. Re:GPS + SMS. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Teach your daughter English and she should be able to find out where she is at any time.

      In some areas, she'd be better off if you taught her Spanish. :P

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:GPS + SMS. by amohat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The people that want to rape and molest your daughter statistically are yourself or one of your brothers(-in-law)"

      Great idea for a list. Let's rank, in order of probability, likely suspects in a given child's life.

      Police will tell you that immediate suspect #1 in a woman's murder is husband/boyfriend or ex. I guess that's based on stats, though I've never actually seen them.

      Whatever, the poster is a nutcase and is over-reacting. Get the kid a off-the-shelf cell phone device from the local cell company that offers kid-tracking GPS service. That way the kid can get a decent electronic safety net and the father can avoid the obsessive neurosis, maybe even focus a little more on quality time and less spooky surveillance psycho.

      Last, this smacks of "uh I have this friend, and he wants to know how to ..." bullshit. What does this dude really have in mind, and why do i suspect it has more to do with a ongoing custody battle than the kids safety? Why not go with a commercial product/service that hits your credit card each month? What other reason than because dude wants to be able to hide his tracks and not have this "system" show up in court records? My predator alarm is ringing pretty loud on this one. Sounds like a good list of requirements for a high-tech kidnapper/stalker. What next, dude wants web cams in his daughter's bedroom...and bathroom...just to make sure she's "safe" ???? But he wants to keep the whole system off the grid, with remote shut-off, no doubt!!!!

      What a good parent ought to do in this situation is become more physically involved in their kids life. Be at the school enough to know the drivers and teachers and the kids friends and their parents. Not just the asshole who freaks out when he experiences "bad customer service" at the school and is never heard from again. The schools will be as good as we make them, showing up only when you don't like something is hardly a positive contribution. That's just being selfish.

    3. Re:GPS + SMS. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Easiest way would be to it respond to a 'ping'.

      But then, every time she passes by a duck-filled pond, the phone bill will skyrocket.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:GPS + SMS. by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      If you can get a cheap Chinese clone then it doesnt really matter if you lose the original does it? Just make sure you backup regularly.

    5. Re:GPS + SMS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend whose father made him find his own way home in the middle of Lima when he was barely a teen. (It took him about a day).
      Since then he's been shot at, traveresed Peru's jungles, and started a high-income business.
      He now lives in the suburbs of a city in Canada with his wife, two children, and owns a mini-van.
      I hardly think that getting on the wrong bus can be that detrimental for a child.

  13. My 6 Cents worth by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    Having two daughters my self - the last one graduating from HS this Friday, I understand the OP's concern, especially if the child is still in Grade School. The Cell phone with GPS is your best bet, unless the school is banning cell phones (which my daughter's school tried to do). Another option is car pooling where a parent picks up several kids at once and then the next parent the next day - etc. Put your tin foil hat away, or your daughter will begin to see boogey men around every corner.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:My 6 Cents worth by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      I simply don't understand how a school can get away with banning a cell phone. It should be my choice if I want my child (I don't have any yet) to have a device that allows me to contact them or them to contact me.

      Inappropriate use should simply just be them telling me so I can discipline my child. More zero tolerance bullshit like the aspirin expulsions.

    2. Re:My 6 Cents worth by vlm · · Score: 1

      It is wrongly, yet widely believed, that a right to "More zero tolerance bullshit" is one of the constitutions amendments.
      Understanding that belief, explains a lot about Americans.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:My 6 Cents worth by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I simply don't understand how a school can get away with banning a handgun. It should be my choice if I want my child (I don't have any yet) to have a device that allows them to protect themseleves.

      Banning cellphones became an issue after kids were abusing them. Texting answers back and forth, disrupting the classroom, etc.
      Now, a lot of kids have them, but they are 'off', and in the locker. Not much good as far as tracking goes.

    4. Re:My 6 Cents worth by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 1

      At my old school, the issue was disruption in classes and students slacking, so phones were treated like any other device, or magazines, or anything else. If you were caught with one in lessons, it would be confiscated (and staff were allowed to confiscate items for up to a term under some circumstances), and students were not allowed to leave the classroom to answer phones either, but they were allowed to be used at the owners risk outside of lesson hours.

    5. Re:My 6 Cents worth by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Handguns are illegal for a child to carry anywhere. Cellphones are not. A very STUPID analogy.
      Obviously children will abuse any tool given them. The trick is to...well...PARENT them and teach them not to.

      I had a calculator in school that could store a cheat sheet on tests. A few other kids did as well. I could have cheated anytime I wanted to. My father taught me not to cheat. I also carried a knife all though school. I could of knifed anyone I wanted at any time. My father taught me not to kill people. I think he could of taught me not to text at school.

    6. Re:My 6 Cents worth by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

      You are living in an pretend world.

      1. Kids do stuff with cell phones that they should not be doing. They text each other during class, their friends (and enemies) call them, they browse and cheat during tests. I know, I know, not YOUR perfect little princess, nope, she's going to be perfect and never do those things. But the other kids do. And if you think that the school calling you to discipline your child when they do these things is a good solution, you are out of your mind. Parents will make excuses, and say 'Prove that my child was cheating on the test' or 'It's not her fault that someone else called her', and then lawyers will be involved, and it doesn't work. I know, I know, not YOU, you're perfect too and when your child does something bad, you will properly discipline her, and she's be perfect again.

      2. It's disruptive to the entire class. If you need to contact them, or they need to contact you, you either call the fucking office, or the child calls you from the fucking office. How hard is that? Is that too difficult for you? There will be a slight delay as they look up the name of the current teacher and have the student come down. It's far, far better than having someone's phone ringing every 5 minutes because someone needs to tell their child that they gave them the wrong lunch, and then they talk for 15 minutes about some random crap, while telling the teacher, "I'm getting off the phone real soon now!".

      Schools over-react for thing like aspirin because they get their asses sued when things go wrong. The rules are really simple: don't bring any medicines to school and self-administer. The parent gives them the medicine. If it's emergency (a la Epipen) then the nurse / aide holds it. Why is that so frigging hard? But, banning cell phones in classrooms is not overreacting. It's common sense, and it's the only way that it's going to work. And if you take one phone-abusing child's phone away, then you have to take them all away, because otherwise you get sued again: "You let child X use a phone and you didn't suspend her, you don't let my child get away with it because he/she is a girl/boy/black/white/gay/straight/left handed/etc."

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    7. Re:My 6 Cents worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame he didn't teach you a better grasp of the English language.

    8. Re:My 6 Cents worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the responsibility of the public school system. They learned me good.

      But had he wanted to, I'm sure he could of beat that into me as well.

  14. Whoa.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your attitude is extremely unhealthy for your child, honestly.

    However, most of the major carriers have child oriented cell phones that can be located in an emergency. Most of them will also allow the child to call you or 911, and be restricted otherwise. Real time monitoring is going to be pricey, however, and somewhat psychotic.

    Not to mention, you would need to put a live transmitter on your kid.. Personally, I don't want to expose my child to 24/7 RF.

    1. Re:Whoa.. by icebike · · Score: 1

      > Your attitude is extremely unhealthy for your child, honestly.

      Being grabbed by a pedophile is even more unhealthy.

      Any child young enough not to reliably get on the right bus is probably grade 4 or less. This is exactly the age that parents must exercise extreme vigilance. Old enough to go in public unaccompanied but still naive as a newborn kitten.

      For you to come here and pompously state that abdication of parental responsibility is more healthy than having the kid carry a cell phone due to some tinfoil hat paranoia about RF reveals a really sick and naive mind.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Whoa.. by gwythaint · · Score: 1

      > Personally, I don't want to expose my child to 24/7 RF.

      Too late. Those fluorescent lights, cell phone towers, microwave ovens, computer monitors, and all the other modern conveniences kick off more than enough R/F

      I think you are the one with the unhealthy attitude.

    3. Re:Whoa.. by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Is it really possible NOT to be exposed to 24/7 RF?

    4. Re:Whoa.. by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 1

      Is it really possible NOT to be exposed to 24/7 RF?

      I'm not exposed to RF. My tinfoil hat protects me.

    5. Re:Whoa.. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      As opposed to paranoia and fear? I'd rather have the occasional child brutally abused and murdered than an entire generation of people scared to leave the house without big brother watching.

      One is bad for the individual, the other kills the whole society.

    6. Re:Whoa.. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Knocked down that nasty strawman nicely.

      Too bad you mad him out of your own clothes.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  15. Simple Solution by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Teach them their phone number and give them a bracelet or something with their address on it.

    You should also probably stop watching television. Give up on the news especially. It's just scare mongering crap.

    Oh and watch Finding Nemo. It's got some lesson in there about being an overprotective parent.

    1. Re:Simple Solution by adnd74 · · Score: 1

      the message I got from Finding Nemo was that sometimes overprotective parenting pays off...

    2. Re:Simple Solution by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Oh and watch Finding Nemo. It's got some lesson in there about being an overprotective parent.

      Is that lesson that you and all but one of your children are going to die within the first five minutes of the film no matter what you do?

      Or have you been watching different Disney films than I have?

    3. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The message I got from Finding Nemo is that we should all eat more fish to prevent them making a sequel.

    4. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *golf-clap*

    5. Re:Simple Solution by Turidoth · · Score: 1

      But the fish dad has a good reason to be over-protective (all his other kids and wife got eaten). Parent poster does not. Cell phone, and knowing home address is best bet.

    6. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second the "skip the news" part. Since i became a parent, I've rarely watched the news because of the 95% cring actor these days. I used to watch Law&Order SVU before I had a child. Now it makes we want to vomit to just see 5 seconds of an episode.

      *insert joke here*

    7. Re:Simple Solution by martinX · · Score: 1

      But the fish dad has a good reason to be over-protective (all his other kids and wife got eaten).

      They what?! Mum and Dad said there was an incident and all the fish were taken to fish hospital. To get better. Or was that "to get battered"?

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    8. Re:Simple Solution by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Oh and watch Finding Nemo. It's got some lesson in there about being an overprotective parent.

      WT-Flip is the lesson from Finding Nemo. That if you allow your kids any freedom then they'll get lost and probably end up incarcerated with other people before being sold (given for free in the film) on to a short life of neglect before death (in the film at the hands of the dentist's niece). If that happens then most likely your kids cell-buddies will help to bust them out through the toilet; or they may escape by playing dead and being dumped (down the sink). At this stage if you [Dad] survive the gangs (seagulls in the harbour) then you may eventually be reunited.

      Thanks for the tip - I'm going home now and shackling my sons to the wall in their bedroom.

    9. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and all this time I thought Finding Nemo was for pre-gaming for nights of mass sushi feasting

  16. Off the Shelf Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like it could fit in something smallish.

    http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/theft-recovery-asset-tracker.html

    1. Re:Off the Shelf Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having heard the song "Brick House" a few times, I'm not sure how comfortable I'd be with "Brick House" providing personal security for my elementary-school-aged daughter.

  17. Do you really want to do this? by Albanach · · Score: 1

    You could make something with a smartphone I'm sure. The problems I see with that are, firstly that GPS wants line of sight to the satellites so the phone has to be obvious and secondly smartphones are desireable and expensive. Your child may now become a target for thieves.

    You could hide the phone, or use a small computer like a nokia n series and use a small bluetooth GPS unit. It could be placed unobtrusively on top of a backpack with the phone/computer inside. Trouble is the battery life on my bluetooth GPS is only a few hours. Much less than a school day. Your daughter probably doesn't want to be lugging a big battery pack around all day.

    Why not buy your daughter a cheap cell phone on a pay as you go plan and show her how to answer it. Next time you don't know where she is, you can call and ask her?

    I'm curious though. Were you ever out as a child and your parents didn't know exactly where you were?

    1. Re:Do you really want to do this? by icebike · · Score: 1

      See here:
      http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/edwardbaig/2006-07-26-disney-mobile_x.htm

      Location via GPS is assisted by cell towers. Line of site is not always needed with AGPS chipsets. Its all automated.

      There is no reason this phone could not be zipped into a backpack and the child told never to take it out unless it rings. Thieves can be tracked as well.

      This is a commercial service. There is no reason to cobble together something complex.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Do you really want to do this? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      This is a commercial service. There is no reason to cobble together something complex.

      This is Slashdot. Every wheel must be re-implemented as open-source software.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    3. Re:Do you really want to do this? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Exactly So.

      I initially read the Original Post as someone looking for some measure of keeping track of a new and naive school child.

      The more I re-read it the more obvious it seems that the real issue was a DIY project where the goal is to spend any amount of time and effort and money to use Free Software rather than buy a service that the kid might actually LIKE to have (such as a track-able child's cell phone).

      I was going to suggest, (at the risk of being called an insensitive clod) that he duct tape the netbook, GPS, Batteryback to the Family Dog rather than risk the poor kid being nic-named "Terminator Girl" for all the DIY gear he wants to lash onto her.

      Now my principal question is: Does the Mother know about this scheme?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  18. Young parent? First kid off to school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    FP has it right. Calm down.

    I pity the poor boy who brings her home 15 minutes late from a date 12+ years from now.

  19. Get a car-tracker by cycler · · Score: 0

    Not sure about size and power though.

    Anyways, a SMS to the phone will let it reply with it's position. Wouldn't be hard to get this into Google Maps or something similar.

    /C

  20. You're solving the wrong problem by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    However, since it took less than three days for my local school district to misplace my daughter, I have decided that something needs to be done. By the school district's own admission it is a recurring problem of placing children on the wrong buses. Fortunately, my daughter was located, with no thanks to the local school district.

    The problem isn't that you don't have a tracking device for your daughter. The problem is that your local school district isn't doing its job correctly and regularly putting kids on the wrong bus. Instead of posting on Slashdot for a technical solution, a far better solution would be a call to your local news organizations about how the school district is getting kids lost on their bus system and admits to doing that regularly. Raise a stink at school board meetings, PTA meetings, and so forth. Get other parents involved. You're talking about a school district's incompetence endangering not only your own child but all the children in the district.

    Pretend, for instance, that you get a perfect tracking device for your daughter. That sorta solves your problem, in that you can go and pick up your daughter from wherever she was left, but doesn't solve your neighbor's problem, and doesn't solve the problem of what happens to your daughter when she's standing around in a strange neighborhood.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by canajin56 · · Score: 5, Funny

      a far better solution would be a call to your local news organizations about how the school district is getting kids lost on their bus system and admits to doing that regularly. Raise a stink at school board meetings, PTA meetings, and so forth. Get other parents involved. You're talking about a school district's incompetence endangering not only your own child but all the children in the district.

      Two problems with this. First, it's a lot of work. Second, he wanted a solution that runs on Linux.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      But, but, that might actually solve the problem for everyone! We can't have that. Besides, he wouldn't get to play with his computers.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My point (which a lot of other posters are making) is that OP's biggest mistake is thinking that the correct thing to do here is come up with a technical solution to figuring out where his daughter is. It's one of those instances where the engineer's "find a technical solution" instincts are not what's really needed: what's really needed is working the levers of politics to make the school district do their friggin' jobs.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      nd doesn't solve the problem of what happens to your daughter when she's standing around in a strange neighborhood.

      The solution to that is tell the kid DON'T GET OFF THE BUS IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU ARE. A school bus driver is not going to dump toddlers on a street corner, worst case she rides back to the depot and gets another bus or waits till you can pick her up. The driver has a radio or cell phone and will let the school know, and they'll tell you. No need for surgical implants.

    5. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure canajin56's point is Whoosh!

    6. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the technical solution to that is generally illegal, you can not use a cattle prod on the school administrators when they do something stupid.

      My school system used something very simple the bus driver knew ever student that was supposed to be on there bus (it's what 240 kids if they have three runs of 80 morning and afternoon) and paid attention while they were boarding. Driving bus was generally a soccer mom job, I guess it's more of an upgrade from McDonalds now.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    7. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by icebike · · Score: 1

      Instead of posting on Slashdot for a technical solution, a far better solution would be a call to your local news organizations about how the school district is getting kids lost on their bus system

      Except that he can solve his problem for his child within a couple days, whereas the political or public approach will take years. She will be far to savvy to track by the time a social solution can be found.

      Its all well and good to self righteously posture here on slashdot about how easy it is to humiliate a school district into doing something you want them to do.

      Its also obvious as hell that you have no kids and have not dealt with a school district in any capacity since you graduated from High School.

      Go home.
      Make a bowl of Jello.
      Poke your finger into it up to the second knuckle.
      Pull finger out.
      See how HUGE and obvious that hole is?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but a technical solution can work.

      Ever tried fighting local politicians? They are worse than the state and national legislative scum critters. We had a case locally where one part of the city government told a homeowner to make some sort of property modification to meet some obscure code (something about a wall), and then another part of the city government *fined* the homeowner for making the mod, saying it violated some obscure code. Der. Yes, there were conflicting codes if they were applied a certain way. They were so poorly written it was hard to tell.

      It took him *TWO* motherfraking *YEARS* to get it resolved, primarily because the city officials were the biggest, dumbest cocks ever to walk this earth. A local public access station aired videos of the city council sessions concerning the issue, and the city offical sounded like a pack crack addled retarded idiots.

      Trying to work local government is a full time job, and has no guarantee of *EVER* working out.

      And your whole argument is a false dichotomy. Nothing stops him from using a GPS system *now* and also working with the brain dead zombies on the local school board. It's not either/or. Most of life's problems fit that mold: there's a quick fix for mitigation now (a finger in a dike), and then a search for a longer term solution (build a better dike).

    9. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by phatStrat · · Score: 1

      Two problems with this. First, it's a lot of work. Second, he wanted a solution that runs on Linux.

      Seriously. This is slashdot. All problems must be resolved using overly complicated technical solutions requiring minimal socialization skills. When he can interface to the PTA using SOA, THEN we might have a better solution.

    10. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "a far better solution would be a call to your local news organizations about how the school district is getting kids lost on their bus system and admits to doing that regularly. Raise a stink at school board meetings, PTA meetings, and so forth. Get other parents involved. You're talking about a school district's incompetence endangering not only your own child but all the children in the district."

      Oh great idea! That'll make his daughter very popular with the school. I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong by embarrassing the school district in the local newspapers.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    11. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "make the school district do their friggin' jobs."

      so daddy comes in and shouts and screams and makes a big stink, then goes back to work leaving little 6 yr old Susie in the hands of these complete idiots. I'm sure nothing will go wrong with that...

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Oh great idea! That'll make his daughter very popular with the school. I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong by embarrassing the school district in the local newspapers.

      That's straightforward to handle: They go after his daughter, he calls up his media contacts again to tell the followup story of how the school district's response to the story about endangering kids was to punish his daughter rather than solve the problem. Reporters usually don't mind a chance to go after public officials, especially when the story is "school officials punish nice little girl over something our media outlet said". And of course, call an attorney to start drawing up the appropriate legal action.

      I have some anecdotal experience with this approach, because my sister ended up in exactly this sort of hot water due to her role as editor-in-chief of a school paper that printed editorials critical of a superintendent. End result: superintendent was fired, my sister went on to Harvard.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    13. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Except that he can solve his problem for his child within a couple days, whereas the political or public approach will take years.

      I think you're underestimating the power of (a) media attention, (b) angry parents and voters, and (c) a real threat of lawsuits to get officials' butts in gear.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    14. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by icebike · · Score: 1

      And I know for a fact you over estimate these things.

      These are political animals, that even local judges are powerless to control.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    15. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      What about both? Yes he should be after the school non-stop to take care of this, but what if that takes a month? Three months? Or more? What should he do until then?

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    16. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      Second, he wanted a solution that runs on Linux.

      In college, I wrote several e-mail bomb programs in Linux. Of course, he'll likely need to change the sender from "bill.gates@microsoft.com", and maybe the content shouldn't be Linux 1.3.20... but you can still harass the school board and PTA using Linux.

    17. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by eln · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I got distracted and ate the Jell-O.

      What was your point again?

    18. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Pretend, for instance, that you get a perfect tracking device for your daughter. That sorta solves your problem...

      Actually, the tracking device is a solution to his question but only workaround to the original problem of his child getting on the wrong bus. It isn't close to a solution at all because it doesn't change the probability of her getting on he wrong bus. He asked the wrong question to begin with.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    19. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In high school I had a hard enough time getting on my buss. Between people talking when they announced buss changes, and my buss changing numbers at least 2 times a week (when it would show up at all). I am not surprised your elementary school aged daughter is getting on the wrong buss.

      My solution was to look for the 2-3 buss drivers we usually had, or look for the people that rode the buss with me.

    20. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Generally the problem solves itself within the first couple days. This isn't a vast conspiracy of incompetence, it's a kink that gets worked out at the start of every new kindergarten class.

      Getting on the wrong bus also makes the kid more aware of what bus he/she needs to be on to get home (did for me, i got on the wrong bus my first day in kindergarten... who wouldn't want to be on bus #1??)

    21. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, too easy.
      How about "if he harasses the school board etc., maybe his daughter will actually grow up to run Linux".

    22. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes but what do I do in the meantime while waiting for the school district to do their job, while they keep reassuring me they are analyzing the issue?

    23. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about moving to a better school district? You say they're regularly losing kids? How may have been raped, killed or abducted because of the school districts incompetence? None? Then odds are you have time to leave and find a place that doesn't treat kids like numbers.

      Putting GPS on a kid isn't going to save them if theres trouble and you're across town and can't get to them in less than 30 seconds. Giving them a gun might, but GPS, like security cameras is an after the fact tool.

    24. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by martinX · · Score: 1

      Well he should sort it out with the principal. And if that doesn't work, throw a linux-powered netbook at his head. Linux solves another problem!

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    25. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're overcomplicating the problem. Why specify it needs Linux? This problem doesn't need a technological solution. Where we come from, we just get a piece of yarn, a very very long piece of yarn, and ya see ya tie one end to the little finger of the child you're tracking....

    26. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by DeafScribe · · Score: 1

      Beautiful. Instead of solving one person's problem, solve it for the entire community. That's smart scaling.

    27. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of subjective or passive aggressive ways that a district which so desired could take out their aggression on a student. These are things which would be insufficient to rile up a newspaper, and in fact might discredit this parent as a source of frustration (oh look, he's complaining about something else, and without knowing the complete details from the district's perspective, it sounds like there's a reasonable chance they were acting appropriately).

      For example, there are a variety of subjects which grading is largely subjective. Penmanship, reading, science fair contributions, etc. And even in non-subjective tests, giving credit for partial answers is a subjective call (if the teacher believes the student understands the material, but just flubbed the answer on a trivial detail usually they'll give credit or at least partial credit).

      Discipline is also largely subjective. A district that so desired could turn each minor infraction into a major incident, and could possibly even bait the child into misbehavior (when I was in 8th grade I had a teacher who liked to do this with me; and as an 8th grader, I fell for it pretty much every time). What one student would get a trip to the principal's office for, this guy might find his daughter is getting suspended for.

      Anyway, all that is not to say that he shouldn't make such an attempt, it's just to disprove that retaliation can necessarily be effectively counter-retaliated when the balance of power is not in your favor.

      What he should do is talk to the PTA and school board, and recommend that each student with a new bus assignment (both for all kinder gardeners as well as other students whose bus assignment has changed either at the start of the year or mid-year) should get a card with their name, address, school, and bus details printed on it. Kinder gardeners should get theirs with a plastic sleeve and a pin to attach it to their bag or lanyard to hang around their neck.

      Finally I'm not convinced that simple discrete tracking technology is a bad idea. Not something so discrete that you could secretly hide it on a person, but something that a person could hide on themselves. This makes sense for more than the safety of a child who is spending their first day away from their parents, but also could be useful for a variety of other purposes (put one in your laptop bag, put one in your car, etc). Sort of a generic user-activated Lojack.

      It's not uncommon for wealthy Mexicans to secret such a device on themselves and their family members (supposedly sometimes surgically implanted). This is because it's too common for them to be kidnapped and held for ransom (and often after the ransom is paid, the hostage^Honly witness is disposed of, having been kept alive to this point only to provide reassurance). This could therefore be useful when traveling to dangerous countries.

    28. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Ah, collectivism at its finest. His solution involves convincing a vendor to take his money in exchange for a GPS (shouldn't be hard) and convincing the daughter not to take off the device (shouldn't be too hard). Your solution involves convincing an entire community, and you think that's the better one?

      Part of individual freedom and responsibility is an acknowledgment that not everyone is going to have the same values as you and, in this case, not everyone is going to be as paranoid as you. First solve your problem; then do the raising awareness thing and see if it catches on to other people. If it does, then it was a global problem. If it doesn't, no harm done; your problem is solved and you didn't have to disrupt other people's values.

    29. Re:You're solving the wrong problem by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The cell phone idea is definitely not a bad one. Several other posters have suggested working with your daughter to make sure she gets on the right bus and ends up where she's supposed to be.

      But definitely gather allies among other parents, consider pulling in a lawyer, contacting school board officials, and so forth, so that a reassurance that they are "analyzing the issue" (i.e. not doing anything about it) don't get them out of hot water. Your daughter's other parent (whether or not they are part of your current household) can also probably help out with this process, because they also have a strong interest in the safety of your daughter. Make sure to talk to other parents in your school district about this. You'll get a lot of sympathy, a fair number of ideas, and a number of allies who can help you force the district's hands. I know PTA meetings and the like may not be your cup of tea, but they're your best source of a real solution to this.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  21. This is why Home Schooling is better by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have an easy solution, take your child out of the care of these incompetents and educate her yourself.
    This is not entirely facetious. If the school can't even pay enough attention to your child to make sure that she gets on the correct bus, what makes you think they are paying enough attention to make sure that she is learning anything?

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:This is why Home Schooling is better by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, she's probably learning independence.

    2. Re:This is why Home Schooling is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIGHT. And while we're home together, I can teach her how to panhandle, dumpster-dive, and all the other skills she'll need because I no longer have a job. Yeah, there's some shortcomings in the public education system... but it's all some people have. Once you have a few kids, perhaps you'll come to realize that there are no 'easy' solutions.

    3. Re:This is why Home Schooling is better by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 1

      Why was this modded troll? This person is not trying to cause trouble. They are giving legitimate advice, and trying to be helpful.

      I have to say though, homeschooling has it's faults. Not everybody is knowledgeable enough to instruct a kid in every subject, and not every parent can stay at home to be teacher all day. I don't like the way schools are run, but I recognize how hard it is to actually make homeschooling work.

    4. Re:This is why Home Schooling is better by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is one, but it requires 9 months foresight.

  22. Wrong Solution by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this question came up a generation ago, before GPS trackers and similar devices were available, you would be looking for ways to better plan school events and to hold the schoolteachers and other school staff accountable for these kinds of mishaps. I think that's the right way to deal with this, though it's not the easy band-aid solution that installing a tracking device would be. In other words, the technological development of a wrong solution doesn't change what the right solution was all along.

    I just don't believe in this widespread approach of dealing only with the symptoms of problems. I might consider it (though wouldn't like it one bit) if it were a material object, but the fact that this is a human being should be all the more reason to address the actual problem. The irresponsibility of the school system and the fact that it has taken its obligations lightly is the actual core problem here. A tracking device only provides an incentive for letting them off the hook when they should have to answer for their failures. Yes, that would be much harder to arrange and would probably require political pressure from other like-minded parents, but it would be so much more worthwhile in the end.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    1. Re:Wrong Solution by celtic_hackr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I have and will continue to voice my concerns about the school and it's lack of good planning. I will be bringing it before the town council, and doing what I can to prevent it from happening. However, I don't have a great deal of confidence in the district anymore. I feel for the other parents too, but my prime concern is to keep my daughter safe. I have the ability to do this and thus don't mind the expense.

      I have to go pick up my daughter now.

    2. Re:Wrong Solution by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Back before cellphones, people planned, they scheduled, they coordinated when they had face to face contact, or possibly over a landline during those times they were at one. They communicated when they had the opportunity.

      They also lost their kids at Disney World, or the Mall, or wherever, and found them at the guest services desk, without freaking out too much because it happened to lots of people.

    3. Re:Wrong Solution by chill · · Score: 1

      A generation (or two) ago the kid would have had her address, phone number and parent's names memorized before entering school and been given instructions on how recognize a policeman or other "trustworthy" person. Bank tellers are a good choice, considering all the cameras in a bank.

      But, you're right that a tracking device is treating the symptom and not the disease. The procedures of the school need to be reviewed and addressed.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:Wrong Solution by TnkMkr · · Score: 1

      I'm going to make the assumption that we are dealing with a child whose age is in the single digits.

      I think your immediate problem could be solved using something like this:
      http://www.guardianangeltech.com/product.htm (although I suggest further google searching, it looks like you are not the first to encounter this problem).

      You could give her the cell phone and encourage her to treat it like a pet, she needs to learn responsibility eventually. It may even be useful to put a virtual pet game on it. You don't need to explain to a 4-10 year old what the true purpose of the device is.

      However, this should be treated like a last ditch safety net, and should also include all the traditional things, make her memorize her home (or your cell) phone number, your address and how to get help if she is lost. After all a cell phone can (and will) get lost.

      You could (or should depending on how assertive you want to be) also try to look at how the school bus line up works these days and see if you can help your school come up with a better way. Chances are no one has had the time to really sit down and come up with a simple wiz bang way to deal with all the kids getting to the right busses. And just in the brain storming that is being shot at you here, you probably could show up with a list of things the school may be willing to try (especially the simple cheap things). Some people may appreciate it if you try to help them improve, rather than just pointing out how crappy they are.

      And the final stage is the most complex part. You will need to talk with your daughter (when she is older) about what you did and why, and even why what you did may have been wrong.

      And be certain to cut the leash. Not when you are comfortable, but when she is comfortable... You will NEVER be comfortable, not even on her wedding day. And recognizing the anxiety early and learning to control it, not ignore it, and that will help to make a great parent.

      Good luck, and know, if this is the worst bump you've run into so far, you are doing dam fine job.

    5. Re:Wrong Solution by syousef · · Score: 1

      Get their attention. Sue the school or district for child endangerment.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:Wrong Solution by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > I just don't believe in this widespread approach of dealing only with the
      > symptoms of problems

      Well, sure, when you put it that way it sounds bad. But in reality he is dealing with what he has control over. He has control over the symptom. Other people have control over the cause. I don't agree that he should forgo what he believes (even if I disagree) will keep his daughter safe in favor or relying on others to get their shit together and keep his daughter safe.

  23. put a chip in her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who finds her can scan her and then send her home. An entrepreneurial person can scan her and know where to send the ransom note and where to also send the pieces afterwards.

    Or you can just give your kid a fucking cellphone with a GPS in it.

  24. It's amazing really by 0racle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's really amazing how any of us, and humanity in general, ever lived past their 10th birthday without all the 'safety' gear that is available now. What a truly wonderful time to be alive, we now finally have the tools to live on past childhood.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:It's amazing really by Topwiz · · Score: 1

      Back when there was no Internet, no video games and one TV in the house that only had 4 channels, parents would think nothing of their children spending 4 hours playing outside without having any idea where they were.

    2. Re:It's amazing really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Numbers. Our ancesters bred like rabbits.

    3. Re:It's amazing really by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Back when there was no Internet, no video games and one TV in the house that only had 4 channels, parents would think nothing of their children spending 4 hours playing outside without having any idea where they were.

      Back then, they didn't have the sexual predator database to keep them informed....

    4. Re:It's amazing really by camperdave · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's really amazing how any of us, and humanity in general, ever lived past their 10th birthday without all the 'safety' gear that is available now.

      Yes, but we don't breed swarms of kids like they used to. A couple of generations ago it wasn't too hard to find a family of fourteen to sixteen kids. These days, over three is getting to be a rarity. All the safety gear and procedures means we don't need to have vast numbers to make up for losses due to lawn dart and teeter totter accidents.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:It's amazing really by darthwader · · Score: 1

      My wife and I were discussing these kinds of childhood adventures. She once missed a stop on her bus, and didn't get to school. The bus happened to drive past her daddy's office building, and she recognized it (from car trips where it was pointed out "that's where daddy works!". She got off the bus, and went to the building's courtyard. She played by herself all morning. At lunchtime, lots of people came out to eat their lunch. One person talked to her, and asked who she was and why she was there. She (happy to talk to a complete stranger) gave her name and said her daddy works here. The person got the daddy's name, daddy was notified, and she was quickly taken to school.

      Likewise, I had lots of adventures when I was 4 or 5, taking my bicycle and dog and wandering far from home until I was hopelessly lost, hours later. But I always found my way home, or found someone whom I could trust to help me, and it all worked out in the end.

      This generation of children will never experience these adventures, since parents are able to keep 24x7 connection to their children.

      If you don't get lost in your neighborhood at age 4, how are you going to handle backpacking in Thailand when you're 21?
      If you never have to look at strange adults and judge which one is the safest to talk to when you have a problem, how are you going to be able to approach a member of the opposite sex at a high-school dance?
      If you never practice getting out of a bad situation when you're 5, how are you going to deal with pressure from your boyfriend when you're 16?
      If you are afraid to march into unknown territory when you are 6, how will you create a new product and a new market when you're CEO at age 46?

      Life is all about getting hurt, healing, and becoming stronger as a result. Kids need to live.

      I don't actually blame the parents, I blame the technology. Parenthood does strange things to a person's brain, and it is impossible for a healthy parent to want a child to suffer, even if it is good for the child. I'm sure that if our parents could have shacked us with love the way current parents can, they would have. And I'm sure we both would have been worse for the experience.

      --
      I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
    6. Re:It's amazing really by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I couldn't agree more. Who needs safety gear like seat belts, air bags, no smoking in restaurants, restricted pesticide use, unleaded pipes, etc. etc. etc. This "safety" doesn't guarantee someone will live to xx years old, it just increases the odds -- which is fine by me.

    7. Re:It's amazing really by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I dunno, this "going outside" and "school" stuff is really scary. With modern technology, we can just put children in a fully-immersive Virtual Reality pod, where they belong.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:It's amazing really by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your sentiment (parents should stop freaking out about their kids' safety) - you could say the same thing about things like child car seats. I mean, I made it just fine riding around (in Africa nevertheless) on my parent's laps without any safety restraints. So why should I subject my child to the constraints of a car seat?

      Sure, getting in a traffic accident is a much more likely scenario than having your child lost by the school district, but since when was Slashdot against using technology to make our lives better / safer? Step back from the natural - ZOMG! Big Brother! - reaction, and it seems like making sure your 6-year-old is at school when she's supposed to be is a good thing.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    9. Re:It's amazing really by Knara · · Score: 1

      And by "informed" you mean "scared out of their mind by a population that existed for all of the history of humanity and yet somehow is worth being paranoid over due to the profit potential available in exploiting frightened parents", right?

    10. Re:It's amazing really by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      The difference is that putting a child in a car seat does not significantly hamper the child's exploration of the world, nor might it make them more reluctant to try things or to establish personal criteria for trust and risk assessment. The technology might make their lives safer in the short run, but I wouldn't say it makes them better now, and might even make them less safe later if, say, the technology should fail and they don't know what to do.

      The drawbacks to restraining devices are few and far between (one might say they make it more difficult to fit more people in a car, or that they make people take longer to enter and exit the car, and that they cost money, for example), and the benefits significant (not being thrown from a vehicle in an accident, which happen quite frequently). The drawbacks to children with tracking devices are numerous (removes or lessens a source of independence and responsibility and trust and life lessons), and much more significant in comparison to the benefits (helps you find them if they get lost, may help retrieve them in the extremely unlikely case of abduction) than in the seat belt example.

      The only life skill a child will miss out on by not wearing a restraining device is how to hold on really tight. Without the luxury of tracking devices, though, my parents taught me, among other things, a valuable navigational skill should I ever get lost... always pick the street that's bigger or has more or thicker lines down the middle and follow it until I hit a familiar street. Fifteen years later, it got me home at night when I took a wrong turn and got completely disoriented in a not-particularly-nice part of town.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    11. Re:It's amazing really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam Walsh didn't make it...

    12. Re:It's amazing really by pbhj · · Score: 1

      It's really amazing how any of us, and humanity in general, ever lived past their 10th birthday without all the 'safety' gear that is available now. What a truly wonderful time to be alive, we now finally have the tools to live on past childhood.

      Life expectancy has dramatically increased in the last few decades.

      http://www38.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=life+expectancy+U.S.#scannerresult_0500_1

    13. Re:It's amazing really by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      And by "informed" you mean "scared out of their mind by a population that existed for all of the history of humanity and yet somehow is worth being paranoid over due to the profit potential available in exploiting frightened parents", right?

      Pretty much... on the other hand, axe murderers, rapists, racial hate cults, and all the other scary people of the world have been on a per-capita decline for the last century, it's just that we have so much better information sharing now that we are more aware of them than our ancestors were - and maybe that's why their numbers are falling....

  25. These are already commercially available. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    I suggest you spend some time on Google or eBay.

  26. Here we go again... by SebaSOFT · · Score: 1

    and what about trowing such device in the back side of a truck and track your wife while is "going shopping"?

    privacy concern people...

    1. Re:Here we go again... by icebike · · Score: 1

      Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children....

      There. Said it. You knew it was coming when you posted that, so we might as well get it out of the way.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  27. Neural network... by n3umh · · Score: 5, Funny

    All you need to do is devise a complex computer with some decision making abilities and program it with information with destination coordinates in case it gets lost.

    Program it to recognize a local authority figure like a policeman or teacher and provide them with the destination information so that they can help it find home.

    I suspect the most effective hardware platform for such an application is some sort of fairly high-functioning biological organism.

    1. Re:Neural network... by OctaviusIII · · Score: 1

      But would it run on Linux?

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
    2. Re:Neural network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Program it to recognize a local authority figure like a policeman or teacher and provide them with the destination information so that they can help it find home.

      It's not necessary to find an "authority," the trick is to teach your child to pick herself whom to ask for help, instead of following (the advice of) a rendom stranger that approached them.

    3. Re:Neural network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A shark with lasers?

    4. Re:Neural network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ftw - thank you.

    5. Re:Neural network... by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      I've already done that, unfortunately, the only learning algorithm available requires a 7-10 year programming period in order to obtain a sufficient stored information database and skill at detecting and solving potentially life threatening and yet initially non-trivial situations.

      example situation:

      All of the other children on the bus have left, and the designated authority figure has not taken you to your designated destination, do you:

      a) ask the authority figure why he hasn't dropped you off yet,
      b) wait patiently for the driver to take you to your destination,
      c) lay down and take a nap,
      d) get off the bus to check out the pretty flowers,
      e) ask the bus driver to stop as you notice him pass a playground,
      f) wait on the bus until after the driver finishes his route and leaves the bus, not noticing the child still on the bus, and then wait for the driver to come back until the bus gets hot and you pass out and die.

    6. Re:Neural network... by schmiddy · · Score: 1

      Hrmm.. I actually did that already. I followed some instructions online for a fun way to roll your own carbon-based biological intelligent computing system. Took a while for the machine to finally come online, and a few years for it to train itself, but even after it reached maturity the results were a little disappointing. See, after they become self-aware, they start making these ridiculous demands, wanting new clothes, cell phones, internet access, allowance money, etc. etc. And the damn machine seems disloyal, even outright hostile at times. I'm thinking about throwing in the towel and just starting to build a new one from scratch.. I hear they come in two different distros, M and F, and the F tend to be easier to handle, at least initially.

      --
      http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    7. Re:Neural network... by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 1

      The minimum known system requirements for the biological port of Linux is a dead badger. the question is, is the child more or less capable?

  28. Ditch the school district . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    So you have a high tech way of locating your daughter. Do you feel like going on a wild goose chase for here once a week?

    Forget the high tech, change your school, that's where the problem is.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  29. Android is the anwer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey there,

    buy an android based phone and install the application " BuddyMob" .
    It geolocates your position realtime on google maps (and allso your buddies that have the same app offcourse).

  30. Laipac Tech Makes one by par0dox · · Score: 1

    GPS Personal Tracker http://www.laipac.com/personal_locator_gps.htm No personal experience with the device but some with the company.

  31. Here's the best solution by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Have conjoined twins, they'll be difficult for a kidnapper to conceal, and nearly everyone will know who their parents are due to rampant media coverage of every detail of their lives. Of course, there are downsides...

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  32. Two Words: Disney Phone by icebike · · Score: 1

    Go get her a Disney cell phone. Parental managed GPS tracking from the web, call limiting, (you can lock it down to only being able to call home).

    Google that.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  33. Errr, what? by whiledo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Was this supposed to be some sort of abstract attempt at humor? Your GPS device does not send data back to the satellites. It's just a passive receiver. It doesn't matter one bit how many other people have GPSes. Might as well claim you're getting poor FM radio reception due to too many people listening to their stereos.

    You would have had a point if you talked about your MOBILE not getting a signal or something due to devices that use that network had you said that.

    --
    Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    1. Re:Errr, what? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      Was this supposed to be some sort of abstract attempt at humor?

      Nope, not at all, merely just misinformed. I was under the impression that they worked by acquiring signals and then periodically requesting information. I had thought there was a limited number of receivers a single satellite could service at a time to update their data about how far they were from that satellite and triangulate their point on the map. Didn't know they were completely passive units. My mistake! Sure does take forever for my receiver to get signals in heavier traffic areas--must just be a poor receiver!

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:Errr, what? by whiledo · · Score: 1

      I have the same problems with my Garmin nuvi sometimes. It seems worse in some cities than others (in quite different latitudes, so that could be the key). And if there are skyscrapers around, the signals will bounce off those and screw it up even more.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    3. Re:Errr, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the web browser does make huge demands of the map application. Does you no good for your GPS to know where you are if it can't actually tell you about it.

    4. Re:Errr, what? by rpresser · · Score: 1

      The satellite is continuously broadcasting time and location signals. Your receiver has to receive those signals. In heavy traffic areas, the signal may be harder to get, not because the satellite is busy, but because reception is worse -- more buildings, for example.

    5. Re:Errr, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And again, most GPS devices don't load their map remotely. It's all installed locally onto the device. There are, of course, exceptions....mostly cell phones.

    6. Re:Errr, what? by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Informative

      Poor receiver, heavier traffic has smog which may make it harder to get the radio signal, maybe you just drove through the heavy traffic areas on cloudy days... who knows. All kinds of things can interrupt it.

      The way GPS works is that the satellites constantly transmit info about where they are, and a time code and the receiver you have picks that up and uses the time delay between the different sats as well as the location of the satellite to triangulate where you are. It's rather interesting.

    7. Re:Errr, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. From a guy who usually has pretty interesting stuff to say, that was one dumbass comment...

    8. Re:Errr, what? by javaxjb · · Score: 1

      The delayed arrival time from bounces off even very close objects can have interesting effects. For some real fun, find a reasonably long path (a half mile or so) below grade with concrete and or stone walls and lots of buildings. Now, loop back and forth several dozen times and download the track to your computer. It'll make you look like Superman jumping across (and into) the trench and in and out of buildings.

      --
      Programmers in mirror are brighter than they appear
    9. Re:Errr, what? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      You also failed to realize what your quoted post was referring to. "in the biz, blah blah, overprotective parent". He was DISCOURAGING anyone from buying these things.

      And what's a "high traffic" area? Somewhere with lots of tall metal buildings?

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    10. Re:Errr, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find most interesting is how horridly simple the concept is. The only hard part is the "satellite" part (well that and the need for accurate clocks that can adjust even for relativity), but the basic premise involves math you learn in highschool you're given a set of known points (the satellites), and one unknown point (yourself), and the distance between each known point and the unknown one (time it takes for signal to reach you) the rest is just applying basic trigonometry.

    11. Re:Errr, what? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      It's actually a little more complicated than that. The mathematics of GPS needs more than the theoretical stuff you do in high school, it needs error correction for atmospheric delays, and spherical intersection math (not just triangular).

  34. Homeschool by robkeeney · · Score: 1

    Your child will not be misplaced again...

    1. Re:HomeSchool by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck, you know NOTHING about homeschooling, do you? First, THERE IS NO DIVERSITY in the government school system. You entire day is spent interacting with kids your own age plus or minus a few months. Second, social interaction in school is called "talking in class" and it's greatly discouraged. Third, government schools are SO BADLY RUN that amateurs can get better results than professionals. This rarely happens in other professions. Usually specialization makes you better.

      Homeschooled kids aren't trapped in little boxes. They're free to go out into the world, explore, learn, interact with a wide variety of people, actually DO REAL THINGS, rather than mocked-up stuff out of a textbook. Freed of the busy-work that government school students are given, a homeschooled kid has the chance to learn to do something really REALLY well. Go to your local state fair and you'll see homeschooled kids disproportionally represented among the top winners of, well, whatever.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  35. Childtracker by tivoKlr · · Score: 1
    Didn't the creators of SouthPark come up with a device that is strikingly similar to your request? "Childtracker" is an unobtrusive child GPS tracking system that fits conveniently on the child's head.

    Maybe they'll sell you one.

    BTW, as a parent (I know, a slashdot reader that HAS had sex) I understand your frustration with your school district...

    --
    Ocean is land, covered with water.
  36. Here's My Answer: by dcollins · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    STFU

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Here's My Answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your small but significant contribution to making the internet a friendlier place.

    2. Re:Here's My Answer: by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 1

      wow. that right there is the response of a pro-union teacher. clearly your love for education is overwhelming.

    3. Re:Here's My Answer: by wonderboss · · Score: 1

      Heed your own advice.


      --
      I've attended both union and non-union schools. Unions are better for incompetent teachers.

      --
      more cowbell
    4. Re:Here's My Answer: by Etrias · · Score: 1

      Notice that "taught" is in the past tense. I'm beginning to see a trend here...

  37. SPOT personal tracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try googling for "SPOT personal tracker". It may be what you need.

  38. Make your kid memorize your cell phone number. by Above · · Score: 1

    If she's old enough to ride a bus, she's old enough to remember a cell phone number and ask a responsible adult to call you when she's in the wrong place.

    Teach her to take responsibility for herself, it will serve her better in the long run.

    1. Re:Make your kid memorize your cell phone number. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a cell phone number is 7 or even ten digits. Teaching her to recognize her bus number is only 3. And a two year old can learn to say "I'm on the wrong bus" over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

    2. Re:Make your kid memorize your cell phone number. by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      She already knows how to spell her name and address. Has memorized the cell phones of both parents and can do numerous other astounding and miraculous feats. However at five years of age she doesn't have the mental capacity you would instill upon her. She will gladly accept a red balloon or chocolate from you or any other total and friendly stranger, as would probably 95% of all five year olds.

      She cannot be relied upon to always make the right choice, hence the need for rational adults or high-tech solutions.

      My knee-jerk reaction doesn't mean I'm an ignorant and uninformed or inattentive parent, or one of those people always shouting "think of of children", as some posters believe. Although I expected such knee-jerk reactions. Thankfully there are also useful posts here, and a commercial solution that looks to fit most of my bill. Maybe, I'm overreacting, but it will give me peace of mind and I will wind up with a new toy to hack up later. Perhaps to be incorporated into an autonomous vehicle later.

      I won't sit by and watch as others put my child at needless risk, simply because they aren't qualified for the job they are in. I don't think I'm asking too much that a school can keep track of, as it turns out about 85 kindergardners (it seems about 10-15% of the parents are picking up their children, or they're just overreacting like me). the school has a total capacity for 500 students, and it hasn't reached capacity. Therefore my initial estimate of 200 was a bit high. How many paid professional people does it take to put 85 pre-K kids on buses?

    3. Re:Make your kid memorize your cell phone number. by Knara · · Score: 1

      She will gladly accept a red balloon or chocolate from you or any other total and friendly stranger, as would probably 95% of all five year olds.

      Which is fine, because over 99.99 percent of adults they will encounter are perfectly safe to accept such things from.

      The other .01% of adults are: 1) people who you already know, and 2) people who won't take no for an answer.

      Since you can't control population #2 to any realistic degree, you better spend your time protecting your offspring from people you already know.

  39. please don't by scapermoya · · Score: 1

    this is only slightly removed from one of those horrible child leashes. No child needs GPS tracking.

    if you are that worried about your child's safety, move to a nicer neighborhood. you'll make up the cost difference with years of therapy averted in the future.

    --
    Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch.
    1. Re:please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah yes, the child leash...a.k.a. that device that absolves parent from doing simple things like teaching their kids not to just wander off on their own.

  40. Simple solution by Topwiz · · Score: 1

    Our school has a separate line inside the building for each bus. All the children know where they are supposed to go to get in line. There is an adult at the head of each line that makes sure they go to the correct bus.

  41. Instamapper by 222 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used Instamapper on my Blackberry to provide real time / historical GPS tracking of myself. It's free, extremely easy to set up, and has Facebook integration. Be warned, GPS is a battery killer. I set all this up when I first became interested in location aware apps, and its run fine since.

    http://www.instamapper.com/

    1. Re:Instamapper by caubert · · Score: 0

      I'm using instamapper too. Especially when I'm hiking in bogs or deep forests. If something happens my family will know where I was.

  42. Take her to the vet and get her chipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cheap, quick, easy, and for $10/m, you can't beat it.

    You can always carve the chip out yourself, and they'll provide free room and board for her at the pound if she ever gets lost.

  43. GPS enabled Cell phone by MacColossus · · Score: 1

    As others have mentioned, a GPS enabled cell phone is the easiest option. I think some of the responses were far less rational than your request. I live in a small-ish community of 185,000 and just yesterday read of a girl that has been missing for 8 years with no leads. If you live in a large community, it is even more common. Between pedophiles and girls being forced into prostitution I think this is a reasonable thing to do. I have even read stories of forced prostitution rings in Iowa, so the problem is pretty wide spread. Only you can decide what is an appropriate trade off between safety and security for your child. You know your neighborhood and naivety of your child better than anyone blasting you on Slashdot.

    1. Re:GPS enabled Cell phone by icebike · · Score: 1

      The FIRST thing a Pedo will do is get rid of the cell phone.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:GPS enabled Cell phone by martas · · Score: 1

      trade off between safety and security? since when do those two contradict each other? :P

    3. Re:GPS enabled Cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and... ahem... how would you know that?

    4. Re:GPS enabled Cell phone by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "The FIRST thing a Pedo will do is get rid of the cell phone."

      Really? I'd imagine they'd be busy trying to find a safe place to hid, I mean if you just kidnapped a child you'd probably be busy trying to drive to a safe place.

      besides, if the pedo is taking away cellphones and other devices and destroying them there really isn't a option then is there?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  44. glad I'm in a small district by james_shoemaker · · Score: 1

    My daughter's bus driver knows all the kids on his bus and if someone is missing or extra the situation is resolved before the bus leaves the school. Another good advantage is the teachers and administrators also know each child personally and if they see something going on they can yell names across the schoolyard instead of just saying "hey you".

    1. Re:glad I'm in a small district by icebike · · Score: 1

      But we don't all live in tiny small towns...

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:glad I'm in a small district by vlm · · Score: 1

      But we don't all live in tiny small towns...

      Pretty obvious, low tech solution to solve that problem.

      No idea why you can't attend a small school in a big city, like I did and my kids do.

      Now, dying cities might try to save money by merging schools into megaschools, but there are plenty of other good reasons to leave a dying city other than the teachers not knowing the names of the 45 kids in their class.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  45. Don't do it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How would your device help your kid after she got on the wrong bus? Will you intercept it in your Batmobile? Worst case she spends an hour sitting on a bus till it gets back to the terminal and she gets the right one, or you pick her up. Doesn't warrant surgical implantation. School bus drivers do know how to handle kids who get the wrong bus.

    Your kid will hate you for this should you ever try to do it. And I wouldn't be surprised if you had to do a lot of explaining to child welfare agencies.

    1. Re:Don't do it. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      How would your device help your kid after she got on the wrong bus? Will you intercept it in your Batmobile?

      I dunno, maybe he'd just like to know where the kid actually is when they aren't at their bus stop when the bus they're supposed to be on drives away without them stepping off of it.

      Worst case she spends an hour sitting on a bus till it gets back to the terminal and she gets the right one, or you pick her up.

      And he gets to spend a wonderful hour (at least) of calling all over the school district trying to find out just where his kid is, and enjoying the gnawing (although unlikely) feeling that something horrible has happened, rather than looking at a screen and calling the school to say "It looks like you put little Billy on the wrong bus. Right now it's at 5th and Main, what's the best way to fix this?".

      Doesn't warrant surgical implantation.

      How the hell did you come up with this? He said he wanted a small, unobtrusive device. He didn't say anything about sharpening up his home-doctor kit to play experimental surgeon on the kid. Personally, I came away thinking cellphone.

      School bus drivers do know how to handle kids who get the wrong bus.

      Which, at best, takes time and leaves him in the position of worrying needlessly, rather than just having the information readily at hand. Maybe the kid gets off at the wrong stop and takes even longer to find, or maybe ends up getting locked in the bus for six hours in an empty parking lot before someone finds him.

      Your kid will hate you for this should you ever try to do it.

      Yeah, kids hate it when you give them cellphones. I always hear them whining, "God mom, I can't believe you gave me my own phone. I totally don't want one of these. Now I'll have to like talk to my friends and send text messages whenever I want. I totally hate you!"

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    2. Re:Don't do it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      How would your device help your kid after she got on the wrong bus? Will you intercept it in your Batmobile?

      I dunno, maybe he'd just like to know where the kid actually is when they aren't at their bus stop when the bus they're supposed to be on drives away without them stepping off of it.

      So after logging into his spy monitor he sees a moving dot on a road. Then what? He still doesn't know what happened. He still has to call the school. He's panicking even more by now, and from the original post, he seems very ready to jump to the worst possible conclusions on the least evidence.

      Your kid will hate you for this should you ever try to do it.

      Yeah, kids hate it when you give them cellphones

      Who's talking about cellphones? He said a GPS tracker, "placed on her". She'll feel like a tagged animal or a convict; when her friends find out they'll certainly make her feel that way.

      I have an 11-year-old daughter. If I was worried about her getting on the wrong bus, I'd spnd half an hour talking to her about what to do. I might go along with her and talk to the driver myself and make sure he could be trusted him to help. I wouldn't tell her I'm going to inject a GPS tracker/strap it on her ankle or whatever. If she's old enough to go to school by herself, she can handle this without calling in SWAT.

      And as with all these "Ask Slashdot", I wonder if any of it is true, or if the whole scenario was crafted to hit hot buttons. "A Linux based solution"? WTF?

    3. Re:Don't do it. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      So after logging into his spy monitor he sees a moving dot on a road. Then what? He still doesn't know what happened. He still has to call the school. He's panicking even more by now, and from the original post, he seems very ready to jump to the worst possible conclusions on the least evidence.

      Or, he calls the school, they know what bus services that area, they call the driver. Easy. All this assumes he doesn't just call the kid directly, although when my daughter was in school she had to turn the ringer off on her phone during the day and it was hit or miss that she'd remember to turn it back on.

      Your kid will hate you for this should you ever try to do it.

      Not only did mine not hate me for it, she was damn happy when shortly after she got her drivers license and got lost that I was able to bring up her location and give her directions to get back on track. Just because you have the ability to track someone doesn't mean you have to be a creep and use it all the time, just show a little self control and common sense. If there's a problem, it's there, if there isn't, why would you spend your time tracking them?

      Yeah, kids hate it when you give them cellphones

      I don't know where you live, but around me I dare you to find a kid over the age of 10 who doesn't have a phone. Quite frankly it seems like most people I know start hearing the kids start pleading for their own phones by 7 or 8, some get them, some don't.

      Who's talking about cellphones? He said a GPS tracker, "placed on her". She'll feel like a tagged animal or a convict; when her friends find out they'll certainly make her feel that way.

      He asked for a solution. A cellphone fits almost every aspect of his requirements list. I'm not sure he fully understands that GPS itself is passive, which means a homebrew solution is pretty unlikely though since he'd still need a transmitter of some kind, but I didn't get anything from his question that suggested to me that he intended to implant or handcuff something to the kid.

      I have an 11-year-old daughter. If I was worried about her getting on the wrong bus, I'd spnd half an hour talking to her about what to do. I might go along with her and talk to the driver myself and make sure he could be trusted him to help. I wouldn't tell her I'm going to inject a GPS tracker/strap it on her ankle or whatever. If she's old enough to go to school by herself, she can handle this without calling in SWAT.

      And that's great for *you*. Just as nobody should be trying to force you to have a tracking system for you daughter, where do you get off telling everyone else that since you don't think it's necessary they're basically all idiots for wanting it themselves?

      And as with all these "Ask Slashdot", I wonder if any of it is true, or if the whole scenario was crafted to hit hot buttons. "A Linux based solution"? WTF?

      I'll agree with you there. Considering some of the questions I've seen lately they should rename the section "Things I could figure out for myself if I would just Google for it for 3 minutes". Oh well, it worked, and we both read the stupid thing.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    4. Re:Don't do it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      where do you get off telling everyone else....

      I'm not sticking my nose in someone's family life. HE ASKED FOR OPINIONS. So I gave my personal fucking opinion, as a father.

      And that's where I get off, asshole.

    5. Re:Don't do it. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      He asked for opinions on a technical solution, not for parenting advice.

      Good job on the cursing and name calling though. Having a temper tantrum like a child who isn't used to being told no isn't a very effective way of getting anyone to take you seriously.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    6. Re:Don't do it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      He asked for opinions on a technical solution, not for parenting advice.

      If the parenting was irrelevant, he would have just asked for a "personal GPS tracking system", not pulled the heartstrings with the story of his little girl on the wrong bus. The "technical solution" he geeked out on was not at all the real problem, just an excuse for him to play with toys, not help his daughter to get home in one piece.

      Good job on the cursing and name calling though.

      When you insult and belittle someone online, you can expect to be called an asshole.

      isn't a very effective way of getting anyone to take you seriously.

      You'd already stopped listening, as was also indicated by the tedious repetition of your "cellphones are so cool" comments.

    7. Re:Don't do it. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Wow. You ignored every point I brought up, were obnoxious and belligerent the entire time and yet are so amazingly thin-skinned that you took that question as a personal insult? Seriously, switch to decaf. And maybe consider a therapist.

      You'd already stopped listening, as was also indicated by the tedious repetition of your "cellphones are so cool" comments.

      I was making points on why they fit almost exactly what the guy was looking for. You did nothing to answer his actual questions, or to refute a single point I made. When you fall back on behaving like a child, online or off, you can expect to have your opinions ignored as juvenile.

      I was civil, you resorted to name-calling and tantrums. And yet I'm the asshole? Amazing.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    8. Re:Don't do it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      To repeat: this is what I take exception to.

      "where do you get off telling everyone else that since you don't think it's necessary they're basically all idiots for wanting it themselves?"

      "I was civil"

      Civilly said I have no right to have an opinion.

      You ignored or deliberately, or just carelessly, misconstrued almost everything I wrote.

      So fuck you and good night.

      ==30==

    9. Re:Don't do it. by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      And yet you still don't get it. You can have an opinion all you want. Nobody cares. But when you discuss things with other people, there's a chance that they'll challenge your opinion. Did you miss the part where I said you have every right to be against tracking systems for your own kids? Why is your opinion unchallengeable with regards to how other people view the subject?

      I don't think I misconstrued a single thing you wrote. If I did, you didn't seem to do a very good job of clarifying your position though, did you?

      You sunk to pure childishness, and then, upon being called on it, decided to do it again. At least you're consistent.

      Good night to you too. I'll refrain from the fuck-you though, although you're going out of your way to deserve one.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  46. Falcom Mambo by dago · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a dedicated solution, you can buy a Falcom Mambo (http://www.falcom.de/products/personal-tracker/mambo/)

    Dedicated GPS tracker with an emergency button
    Long battery life
    Very Open

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  47. Title Ambiguity by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe this "Making a Child" Locating System will be of interest to many Slashdotters.

    1. Re:Title Ambiguity by vlm · · Score: 1

      It seems linux use is incompatible with "making a child". Om the bright side, the non-working sound drivers might be a benefit.

      linux-dude:~$ make child
      bash: make: command not found

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Title Ambiguity by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

      I believe this "Making a Child" Locating System will be of interest to many Slashdotters.

      Yeah a device locating child-making in progress was always one of the things i dreamed of!

    3. Re:Title Ambiguity by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I believe this "Making a Child" Locating System will be of interest to many Slashdotters."

      And many 4chan'ers, mores the pity!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Title Ambiguity by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      It seems linux use is incompatible with "making a child".

      And yet, somehow, we saw the release of Linus 2.0.

  48. LoJack Panties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Billy Crystal used to joke about wanting to install LoJack in his daughters panties. Its a sad day when someone in the /. crowd wants such a device for reals.

  49. How about a cell phone? by lionheart1327 · · Score: 1

    Can't you just give her a cell phone and call her if she gets lost? I'm sure she'll be able to tell you what cross streets shes on.

  50. How about a "child lover service". by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    You could simply hire one of their devices for a small fee, input the details of your child, age, hair colour, eye colour etc and a dedicated team of "child lovers" could follow the movements of your child on a web site for you 24 hours per day.

    You know this is going to happen.

     

    --
    Deleted
  51. Don't do it... by eainmonster · · Score: 1

    Tracking your child is a path you really don't want to start down, unless you want to drive yourself (and them) insane with constantly watching every thing they do. Threaten the school board with legal action. They'll get their act together.

  52. Context? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the age of the daughter...are we talking about an 8 y/o getting on the wrong bus, or an 18 y/o...

    1. Re:Context? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's 38, so what's it to you?

  53. Re:Overprotective git by bigjuantehfurby · · Score: 1

    I'll be in my bunk.

  54. Don't try for a workaround. Try for a solution by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're like someone installing a firewall when an unpatched service allows arbitrary connections, instead of patching the service.

    Your school places your daughter on the wrong bus, that's the problem. Not that you can't track her. Solve the underlying problem instead. Either storm the principal's office and fire up a storm, get the PTA (if existant) to do something about the problem (since it's a "recurring problem" you're certainly not the only parent in that situation, get in touch with the other parents) and if everything fails, get another school to teach your kids (which is probably a sensible idea anyway, if they're not able to get your daughter in the right bus and didn't manage to teach her to choose the right one, it's likely they don't manage to teach her anything else either).

    You're looking for the solution for the wrong problem. The problem isn't that you can't find your daughter. The problem is that she isn't where she should be in the first place. Don't cure the symptom, cure the sickness!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Don't try for a workaround. Try for a solution by Eil · · Score: 1

      Your school places your daughter on the wrong bus, that's the problem. Not that you can't track her. Solve the underlying problem instead. Either storm the principal's office and fire up a storm, get the PTA (if existant) to do something about the problem

      In many schools, the school faculty don't "put" kids on busses. The busses are waiting out in back and the kids are expected to board the right one. That's how it worked in my school. It's efficient and it teaches the children a modicum of responsibility, even if a kid boards the wrong bus from time to time. If this is the case with the submitter, then him bringing his wrath to the PTA is going to accomplish nothing except making him look like every other over-reacting parent who can't stand the thought of their precious snowflake actually making a mistake or misjudgement.

      It sounds like what the school system needs is just a few tweaks to their boarding procedure. Another commenter mentioned laminated bus passes with the bus number printed on them, I think that's a smashing idea as long as it's used as an advisory system and not an enforcement one.

    2. Re:Don't try for a workaround. Try for a solution by apocalypse2012 · · Score: 1

      Its not his system to patch. And the system is compulsory. His only interest and responsibility is his kid.

    3. Re:Don't try for a workaround. Try for a solution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And since everyone's thinking this way, nothing changes and the schools can be as crappy as they are. You'd call that a solution?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  55. Educate her by blhack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This happened to me when I was a kid. The school thought that I had signed up for Hockey, but hadn't. They sent me across town to hockey practice.
    Instead of freaking out, I got there and started playing hockey. Then I called my mom and told her to come and pick me up.
    Why? Because I didn't have psychotic over-reacting parents. I was smart enough to go "there is a problem here, I should fix it."
    And I did.

    Teach your daughter this same thing. Make her memorize your phone number.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:Educate her by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I love the priorities chosen. ;)

      As a kid, I'd have told the bus driver. If they were idiotic, I'd have called my mom (because she'd be the one home, in my family) and told her what happened immediately. I doubt I'd have played hockey, but if it was something I'd enjoy... Maybe. I was awful shy.

      I'm still trying to figure out how the scenario in the summary played out, though... Okay, so the kid's on the wrong bus... She got off at the wrong stop, too? Why and how?

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Educate her by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Not all kids can handle this when they first ride the bus... the more you trust them to, the faster they will learn, but reality is that not everyone is "up to speed" when they are 7 years old.

      When I was 6, I made my own oatmeal by boiling water in a pot on the stove and pouring it myself, put myself on the bus, and let myself in the house with a key I carried, mom and dad got home about an hour after my bus dropped me off. I could handle it, and they really couldn't afford both daycare and the BMW. My son is 7 and he needs someone to take him from the curb to the classroom every morning... not for lack of my trying to help him be as independent as possible.

    3. Re:Educate her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo!
      If the kid calls from a payphone, chances are there is a landmark (shops, library etc) that you can use along with google maps to find the exact location.
      You can then give it instructions like 'stay on that side of the road, head towards the library, go inside and wait inside at reception until I get there.

      Bonus points for finding the kids destination before it gets there and call ahead so they can greet your offspring by name and calm it dowm.

    4. Re:Educate her by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Same story, but it was bowling. And I was just a kid who wanted to go bowling - I didn't know if I was signed-up or not. :-)

    5. Re:Educate her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because I didn't have psychotic over-reacting parents. I was smart enough to go "there is a problem here, I should fix it."
      And I did.

      Teach your daughter this same thing. Make her memorize your phone number.

      Great idea.. sadly that uses the elusive ability of "Common Sense". Common sense is typically taught by parents to the children. His reaction means he lacks that skill and thus, cannot teach it.

    6. Re:Educate her by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Teach your daughter this same thing. Make her memorize your phone number.

      - and to play hockey.

  56. escape by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My specification are: 1) a small unobtrusive device I can place on my daughter, 2) an application to pull up on any computer, a map with a dot indicating the real-time position of my child, 3) a handheld device with the equivalent information, 4) [optional] a secure web application/plug-in I can install on my own domain allowing me to track her from anyplace in the world, 5) a means of turning it all off, 6) a Linux based solution of the above.

    Wow. Perhaps she was trying to get away from you.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:escape by fiendy · · Score: 2, Informative

      My specification are: 1) a small unobtrusive device I can place on my daughter, 2) an application to pull up on any computer, a map with a dot indicating the real-time position of my child, 3) a handheld device with the equivalent information, 4) [optional] a secure web application/plug-in I can install on my own domain allowing me to track her from anyplace in the world, 5) a means of turning it all off, 6) a Linux based solution of the above.

      Wow. Perhaps she was trying to get away from you.

      Why not ask the parents of Tori Stafford whether an unobtrusive system could have been useful to them.Google if you want to know the backstory.

      I'm not saying that he may not be excessively paranoid, but I also do not think that young children deserve any expectation of privacy which trumps the knowledge of their whereabouts and safety in any number of situations.

      Yes, I realize you were trying to be funny.

    2. Re:escape by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      This sounds like we're talking about a 6-year-old, not a 13-year-old. A 6-year-old is usually not trying to escape their parents.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:escape by selven · · Score: 1

      You mean the girl whose abduction got all over the news because it was such a rare and unusual event, unlike the thousands of children that die every year by getting run over by a car?

    4. Re:escape by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Why not ask the parents of Tori Stafford whether an unobtrusive system could have been useful to them.Google if you want to know the backstory.

      That has been a story that has torn at me for since April 8th, which you can see by following through to my homepage. I haven't posted anything since because everything else just seems so superficial now, and my mind has been focused on technology for the safety and security of children.

      A case like Victoria Stafford obviously victimizes the family more than anyone, but it also victimizes a whole community and beyond. The tragedy has hit many quite hard.

      I was not surprised by the tone of most of the replies that I've seen regarding this submission. Whenever children and their safety comes up, the dominate positions tend to be the "cool" parent who relies upon denial to ensure that everything turns out okay, and the adolescent/early adult who is releasing pent up issues they have with their own parents.

    5. Re:escape by shermo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize you were trying to be funny.

      I don't think so.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
  57. Ah, there is a standard Slashdot answer . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . and doesn't solve the problem of what happens to your daughter when she's standing around in a strange neighborhood.

    . . . give her a shark, with lasers.

    Forget that wimpy GPS stuff.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Ah, there is a standard Slashdot answer . . by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      But what if she ends up Soviet Russia?

    2. Re:Ah, there is a standard Slashdot answer . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the daughter misplaces the school?

  58. Does it come with by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    the Pedobear seal of approval?

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  59. Expensive solution by martas · · Score: 1

    One solution is to get a good, programmable phone (a good nokia phone such as the n95, or any android phone) with a data plan and program it yourself. getting the gps data from the phone API would probably be trivial, but I'm not sure how to post this data somewhere where you can access it remotely. However, this would probably be an expensive solution for you, both in terms of CA$H, work, and convenience for your daughter (the n95 isn't exactly a child-friendly phone, and probably neither are most of the phones with open API's for GPS and data capabilities). Or, instead of a data plan, you could send periodical TXT messages from the phone to your email address. I'm pretty sure I've seen methods for this in the python API for SymbianOS (Nokia's platform). The latter might be easier and cheaper to pull off.

    That being said, I have to agree with 99% of the other posts here, that lecture you on how you're overreacting. Kids get lost sometimes. Life isn't safe. They have to get used to it, and so do you. I'm sure your parents didn't have you tagged with GPS when you were a kid, and you seem to have survived (at least long enough to procreate)...

  60. child?! by whopub · · Score: 0

    Duh-boy, cue debates on how much surveillance for your child is really necessary.

    Child?! I want one of those for my girlfriend!

    1. Re:child?! by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 1, Funny

      You find out your blowup doll is cheating on you?

  61. Tracking device? For a child? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why on earth you want to do it yourself? Didn't you child have default one prebuilt?

  62. pet tracking for child by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    since you didn't ask if was a "good" idea, here goes: numerous tracking devices for hunting dogs are available which will do just about what you wanted. real time locations, on/off controls, small size (50-cents US coin). ALL use proprietary systems and expensive batteries. none interface with any cellphone/crackberry/etc. but they do work well within a 12-mile range of the receiver unit.

  63. SPOT by dcraid · · Score: 1

    My wife got me a SPOT for Christmas. I like to think she worries when I go on long solo hikes.

  64. while you're at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget one of these.

  65. Monitor Everything! Encrypt Everything! by pm_rat_poison · · Score: 1

    Gouge out one of your daughter's eyes and install a webcam, pluck one of her ears out and mount an omnidirectional microphone, graft a microstrip antena on her forhead and replace one of her teeth with a GPS module. This system sends encrypted video through the cellular network of your choice that ssh's to your home terminal, which you can access via your favorite portable device. IPhone preferred, there is a relative app on the appstore
    Maybe you can hack a python app that automatically notifies you when your child leaves designated areas without proper authorization. And when the brain is analyzed deeply enough, maybe you should think about remotely controlling your child.
    Seriously, is there no limit to what people are willing to give up in order to achieve a false sense of security?
    Imagine how YOU would feel if your employer installed a GPS tracking system on you to verify if you're really at home or in a hospital when calling in sick. Imagine how YOU would feel if back in the day your parents DID have such a system to track you down. Imagine what happens to a society whose members are taught that constant surveillance is OK by their own family. Seriously, take a chill pill and
    think of the children

  66. And what of the bad guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With such a tracking device, you'll then have to worry about bad guys abusing it.

    There are people who would cheer for joy if you showed them exactly where every child was at all times.

  67. Cell phone by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Well, you know, since the demise of the 'ticky box' (like that thing that Doctor Who flies around in) everybody else just gives their child a cell phone so the child can call his/her parents.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  68. The Num8 By LOK8U... by Povno · · Score: 1

    I saw this awhile back and now it looks like it should be available soon. It can be personalized to fit you child's daily activities by letting you know if the child goes outside a given area that you have deemed appropriate for them. They call it a virtual fence.

    It's a watch that actually looks like a child's watch making it less obvious and less intrusive to the child.

    It may seem overbearing to some but perspectives change when kids go missing; especially when it's your kid. And into today's world you can never be too careful. A fancy new watch for my son and peace of mind for his parents... at any price is definitely worth it.

    --
    sudo apt-get lost
    1. Re:The Num8 By LOK8U... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      The ones for dogs deliver an electrical shock to "remind" them they've gone too far...

  69. Security is a Process by richrumble · · Score: 1

    Security is not a product; it itself is a process. And if we're going to make our digital systems secure [sic and or loved ones], we're going to have to start building processes. If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you don't understand the problems and you don't understand the technology. ~Bruce Schneier

  70. Cell phone + GPS enabled by Corson · · Score: 1

    My phone company provides this service for $5 a month. One cell phone can GPS-locate another cell phone twice a month. There is a setup step where a confirmation must be send from each handset.

  71. How about teaching by BlowHole666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about you just teach your child what bus to get on. Or pick your child up from school. In 20 years are you going to want your child to think it is ok to track a person? Will your child be one of the ones that says "Well my parents tracked me as a child and I was fine, so lets let the government track us". The buses have numbers written on them just teach your child what number theirs. Once you advocate tracking people as a valid solution to a problem everyone is doing it.

    --
    I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    1. Re:How about teaching by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      How about you just teach your child what bus to get on. Or pick your child up from school. In 20 years are you going to want your child to think it is ok to track a person? Will your child be one of the ones that says "Well my parents tracked me as a child and I was fine, so lets let the government track us". The buses have numbers written on them just teach your child what number theirs. Once you advocate tracking people as a valid solution to a problem everyone is doing it.

      • Did your children sit in child restraint seats until they were 80lbs?
      • When you were a kid, were you photographed on closed circuit cameras from 235 different angles while you shopped?
      • Does your employer have access to read every single keystroke you type on your work computer?
      • Does your town have traffic lights that mail red-light running tickets to every single offender, thanks to automated video monitoring?
      • How old were your children when you quit using their crib monitors? Did you use audio or video with night vision?

      It's coming, whether you're ready or not. If his daughter isn't mentally ready to handle checking bus numbers on her own (and, this will get easier when she has friends she knows on the bus - the first days of school are the hardest) maybe a tracking solution is in order.

      We can hope he turns off the tracking solution before she goes out on her first date, though I bet that's about the time it will be coming back on again.

    2. Re:How about teaching by wurp · · Score: 1

      In 20 years, high resolution cameras with always-on internet connections will cost $10 and will be everywhere, and software to identify people by gait/face/body structure/license plate recognition will be ubiquitous and open source. *Everyone* will know where you are all the time, not just the government.

    3. Re:How about teaching by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      That all works fine, until they switch bus numbers and don't tell the child that she should be on bus 3 and not 5. My child can count to 100 and the school wasn't too happy about that. They should only be able to count to twenty. They needed my permission to put sunblock on her, so, the first day of class she got sunburn, because the daycare center where I dropped her off, expected the school would do it. Now they have permission and I even provided them with a free bottle of sunscreen and today she got more sunburn because they didn't put it on her again. So now, I have to put it on her myself, before school and hope she still has enough coverage when it's time to go outside.

      This is a 5 year old we are talking about. They have proven limited survival capabilities. I don't plan on tracking her her whole life, just until she can reasonably manage herself, in a year or two. I would consider $50-$500 (or even more) a worthwhile investment for a year or two's worth of being able to better ensure her survival.

      In twenty years, I hope my child can think that she can do whatever is necessary to ensure the survival of her children, and has the ability to do it.

    4. Re:How about teaching by Knara · · Score: 1

      • Did your children sit in child restraint seats until they were 80lbs?

      Ffft, I wasn't 80lbs for a really long time (small kid). Back seat of a 72 Torino didn't have shoulder straps, either (and it was LEADED gasoline!)

      When you were a kid, were you photographed on closed circuit cameras from 235 different angles while you shopped?

      Sadly, in the dark ages we had clerks that physically kept track of us while we wandered around in a store.

      Does your employer have access to read every single keystroke you type on your work computer?

      Previous to computers, everything was done on paper and usually filed. So, essentially, yes.

      Does your town have traffic lights that mail red-light running tickets to every single offender, thanks to automated video monitoring?

      Interestingly, back in the day the speed traps were personally manned. At least these days you know which intersections are the traps, if you're paying attention.

      How old were your children when you quit using their crib monitors? Did you use audio or video with night vision?

      A crib what?

      Not sure what my point in this is.

  72. It gives pedophiles the tools they need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with tracking is that if you can track your daughter, so can a determined pedophile. The only difference is that the pedophile will be watching her movements more closely than you.

  73. Are you sure about those zeros? by codewarren · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or maybe it's your comma. Either way, a google search for "subcutaneous ants" has more hits.

    1. Re:Are you sure about those zeros? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, "subcutaneous ants" 33,600 results
      "subcutaneous gps" 35,800 results

      Where did you learn math?

  74. ZPass tracks school-bus riders. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    Have the school system check ZPass.

    RFID Technology Keeps Track of School Bus Riders
    Seattle-based Zonar Systems has said it is providing RFID technology to the school bus industry to answer the iconic 1969-television question, "It's 10 p.m. Do you know where your children are?" The company's patented ZPass system identifies when and where a student enters or exits the school bus to enhance their safety and security.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  75. You're overthinking this by Minwee · · Score: 3, Informative

    First off, write a letter explaining what has happened and send it to your school board, city council, and local newspaper-who-might-give-a-crap-about-this-kind-of-thing. Talk with your daughter's teachers, the school principal, and whoever else you need to to get some assurances that they're not going to do this again.

    Then, if you're still worried about your children being sent to the off-world colonies while you're not looking, talk with your daughter about what happened and how she can make sure she gets home on the right bus. If you really want a technological solution then buy her a mobile phone, maybe something like one of these beasties which can be locked down to only calling a handful of numbers (not a product endorsement, just giving an example), and make sure she knows how to call you at home if she has trouble again. Keep it charged and have her stash it in her jacket or backpack where she's unlikely to lose it. There's no need to weld it onto a metal cuff around her ankle, just let her use it to call you when she needs to.

    Hopefully you can both feel better about her security that way. You need to know that she is safe, and she needs to know that you trust her and that you are able to help her out if she has troubles. Strapping a prisoner restraint collar around her neck and monitoring her every move isn't going to do that.

    1. Re:You're overthinking this by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      First off, write a letter explaining what has happened and send it to your school board

      Who said I haven't?

      local newspaper-who-might-give-a-crap-about-this-kind-of-thing.

      Ok, now that's a bit creepy, but I see it on the news in other places.

      Talk with your daughter's teachers, the school principal, and whoever else you need to to get some assurances that they're not going to do this again.

      Did that too, but since this has been happening for years, how am I to expect my complaint to fair any better?

      Then ... talk with your daughter about what happened and how she can make sure she gets home on the right bus.

      Again, been there done that.

      If you really want a technological solution then buy her a mobile phone, maybe something like one of these beasties which can be locked down to only calling a handful of numbers (not a product endorsement, just giving an example), and make sure she knows how to call you at home if she has trouble again. Keep it charged and have her stash it in her jacket or backpack where she's unlikely to lose it. There's no need to weld it onto a metal cuff around her ankle, just let her use it to call you when she needs to.
      Hopefully you can both feel better about her security that way. You need to know that she is safe

      Five year olds are great at breaking things they can play with.

      and she needs to know that you trust her and that you are able to help her out if she has troubles.

      She already knows this.

      Strapping a prisoner restraint collar around her neck and monitoring her every move isn't going to do that.

      I was actually thinking something to attach to her clothes or backpack, and also why I wanted an off-switch.

    2. Re:You're overthinking this by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Did that too, but since this has been happening for years, how am I to expect my complaint to fair [sic] any better?

      Well, I guess we all get the government and schools that we deserve.

  76. SPOT! by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

    You want (note that I didn't say need, that's being discussed elsewhere) a SPOT GPS Tracker. Here's some details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPOT_Satellite_Messenger. It's generally $149 for the unit and $100/year for the service. I got one for my father-in-law, who's in his 80s and still working a cattle ranch. If he finds himself in a situation that he can't handle, he just needs to press one button and help is on the way. No need to worry about cell towers, it uses the Globalstar satellite network to send messages, so your kid can use it even while crossing the Atlantic in a kayak.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:SPOT! by dcraid · · Score: 1
      They have a cool feature called SPOTcasting.

      You can track your kid on the Web. Build your own mashup. Imagine the possibilities.

  77. iPhone by Aliencow · · Score: 1

    An option would be giving her an iPhone 3g with a data plan and install http://findmyi.org/ .

    But then, who's going to protect her from interweb-predators?

  78. Cell Phone is no solution by Itninja · · Score: 1

    I am reading a lot of 'just get a cell phone'. Problem is, true GPS requires clear view of the sky to work consistently. That means the cell phone would could not be in a pocket or a backpack, ever. One could use the cell signal's 'location estimator' which might be accurate or might be of by 100's of meters and also required a data plan, but that's not really GPS anymore.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  79. If you can track'em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then so can every other pervert waiting to molest your child. Furthermore it can be used to help establish lifestyle patterns in which people get to know you without you ever knowing them. It is amazing that the vast majority of people just flat out trust technology on this level despite overwhelming proof that YOU CANT TRUST TECHNOLOGY!

    It works like this. Someone GPS's their child. The trend catches on and then someone gets the bright idea that the goobermint should regulate it. Now everyone is forced to wear GPS so the goobermint can trak all of it's wayward citizen's and when someone stumbles into the wrong place without knowing any better the CIA/FBI or your favorite 3 letter organization like the DHS can legal come in and take you to Gitmo as a terrorist without any protections.

    And all this to help protect you and your child. Meanwhile rampant kidknappings are taking place because some underground entity has managed to continually hack goobermint computers and locate all your kiddos. All they have to do next is cut out the gps chips with a chainsaw or a scalpel if they are friendly kidnappers.

    Anyone who thinks I am nuts has obviously not paid much attention to the security forums that have tried to out the very lazy security with RFID implimentations. Technology is great, but it has allowed indentity theft to become MUCH EASIER to perpetrate, and strangely enough, more difficult to track down and catch.

  80. How old is this child? by anyGould · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are we talking about a five year old? Eight? Ten? Fifteen?

    The range of options varies with age. None of which involve tracking your child to a three-foot radius, btw.

    By age 8, your kid should know which bus they're supposed to be on. (Probably earlier, but for the sake of argument.)

    If younger, then you should be addressing it with the school.

    1. Re:How old is this child? by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Five and I have addressed it with the school. the teacher, the principal, and the district administrator, and tomorrow with the town council.

      However, since this has probably all happened before and it is STILL happening, I have to assume, my pebble in the still waters will have just as profound an affect as the others before me.

      I'm not simply attacking this from a single angle. But my prime objective is to keep my child safe, alive and happy. If that means bugging her with GPS or radio-transmitter for a few years, so be it. Better alive and safe than on a poster in Walmart.

    2. Re:How old is this child? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Remember, the majority of posters here are childless and slightly paranoid. There is nothing wrong with being able to track your 5 year old unobtrusively.

    3. Re:How old is this child? by anyGould · · Score: 1

      At this point, I'd say it's time to get the local media involved. Especially if you can find a few other parents who are in the same position.

      My family's past experience (YMMV, etc etc) is that schools will bury for as long as possible - admitting fault just isn't in the playbook. You need to shame them into making the change, and that means making sure it's very public. (If your community does Amber Alerts, that would work well - no school wants to hear their name over the airwaves in that context).

      From your child's POV, I'd suggest seeing if they have a regular driver or bus number - something they can learn: "I ride home with Bob the Bus Driver", or "My bus is number 4". The best defense if street-proofing - making sure your kid knows the way home.

      If you need to go the tech route (and while I still think it's not the right answer, I'm not going to argue), why not go with a simple cell phone? From what I understand, emergency services can track those just fine. (Or you can just call your child, or vice versa).

      Best of luck.

  81. accutracking by brokenhorse · · Score: 1

    www.accutracking.com Works on just about any GPS enabled device. Virtually real time tracking (you define how often the device updates it's location to the server.) It has google maps integration and has a "covert" install option for some evices. All that for $6 a month and no minimum contracts or autorenew subscriptions. Damn I sound like a salesman but I'm not, really. I've used it to bust my teenage son ditching class and driving off with friends in locations I specifically told him not to go.

  82. 'Insightful' my ass by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Holy crap- you are, what we in the biz call, an over-reacting parent. Calm down and take it easy before you destroy your daughter's life.

    Didja read the summary? His daughter went missing after she was put on the wrong bus. I'm not a parent, but even I'm alarmed at reading that. I don't blame the guy, and I think that the normal reaction of any parent in a stressful situation like that can hardly be called 'destroying his daughter's life.'

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:'Insightful' my ass by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      If think this is a normal reaction, I hope you never reproduce. Your children will be more fucked up than even I am.

    2. Re:'Insightful' my ass by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh my god! Put on the wrong bus. The horror. As if the driver, when he/she got to the end of the route, wouldn't have noticed "hey, I've made all my stops and there is STILL a child on the bus. Perhaps I should do something about it".

      I had a similar bus mishap when I was in kindergarten, and that's exactly what happened. I was waiting and waiting for my stop. Eventually the bus driver asked me where I was supposed to be and handled the issue. She got me back to where I was supposed to be let off. No GPS tracking necessary. Instead, my mom retold me what I needed to do to make sure I was on the right bus. After being a bit scared that time, I learned rather quickly and it never happened again.

    3. Re:'Insightful' my ass by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Oh my god! Put on the wrong bus. The horror. As if the driver, when he/she got to the end of the route, wouldn't have noticed "hey, I've made all my stops and there is STILL a child on the bus. Perhaps I should do something about it".

      That assumes the driver isn't a total idiot. I've heard of cases where the driver never did realize he had a leftover kid.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:'Insightful' my ass by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      If think this is a normal reaction, I hope you never reproduce. Your children will be more fucked up than even I am.

      And if you think it isn't a normal reaction for a parent to get nervous when their child doesn't show up at the expected time, I hope you don't reproduce either.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:'Insightful' my ass by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      There's an interesting juxtaposition: someone who admits to being "fucked up" giving parenting lessons. Thanks, I needed that laugh.

    6. Re:'Insightful' my ass by psychodelicacy · · Score: 1

      You're lucky. It happened to me a few times, and I was just dropped off in the wrong place. Problem with being a kid is that, a lot of the time, adults don't listen to you because they assume you're lying/making trouble/confused, and that they know better than you do. They don't like to be told they're wrong by a kid, so they just tune it out.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    7. Re:'Insightful' my ass by celtic_hackr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well to add some more clarity. I'll throw in this one last detail. As I was on my way to the daycare center, to pick up my daughter for her dance class, I get a phone call from the daycare center. The voice on the other end of the line asks, "Did you pick up your daughter from school today?"

      At which point I nearly freaked out.

    8. Re:'Insightful' my ass by Knara · · Score: 1

      You had a very sheltered youth and spend a lot of time watching prime-time news shows alongside Law and Order shows, don't ya.

    9. Re:'Insightful' my ass by v1 · · Score: 1

      As if the driver, when he/she got to the end of the route, wouldn't have noticed "hey, I've made all my stops and there is STILL a child on the bus. Perhaps I should do something about it".

      FWIW, all bus drivers have something they must do at the end of their shift. When they get back to the barn, they are required to walk up and down the entire bus to check for "left-overs". Sometimes it's a kid in the back seat that fell asleep, or a kid that was promised a beating when he got back from school etc.

      It's almost unheard of for a kid to for example, spend the night in a bus barn.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    10. Re:'Insightful' my ass by v1 · · Score: 1

      At which point I nearly freaked out.

      If you want to remove the willies from that memory, just consider the other possible conversation... When arriving at the daycare center, to be told "Your husband picked her up about an hour ago." (and your husband's not even off work yet)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    11. Re:'Insightful' my ass by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Um no, actually not.

      I was raised in a 99.999% white community in Beemer country, with a community country club and our own neighborhood child molester. Who successfully stayed concealed for many years and had his way with a good number of the neighborhood kids.

      I have been: abducted at gun-point, attacked with knives, been attacked by thugs and muggers, been attacked by dogs, lived on the street (and I mean really on the street), been set on fire, made high-explosives in my bathtub, done other dangerous chemical experiments, and lots more things. Lived in three corners of the US, and in several states. Traveled half-way around the world.

      But I've never lived in a shelter.

      Don't watch the news. Nor do I watch crime shows.

    12. Re:'Insightful' my ass by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Oh my god! Put on the wrong bus. The horror. As if the driver, when he/she got to the end of the route, wouldn't have noticed "hey, I've made all my stops and there is STILL a child on the bus. Perhaps I should do something about it".

      No, they get to keep any kids left on the bus at the end of the route.

      They don't get many perks in that job, and the extra help around the house is very welcome, I hear.

    13. Re:'Insightful' my ass by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      And that's saying something. :P

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  83. If you actually want to do this... by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

    I'm going to leave aside the wisdom of doing this, and focus on the practical aspects.

    Has anyone built anything like this?

    An Android phone hooked up to Google Latitude would meet most of your requirements - small, accessible anywhere you've got an internet connection, accessible on mobile phones, phone can be turned off, phone is linux based.

    Is there an open source solution?

    There's OpenGTS, an Open GPS Tracking System. However, it's not obvious from their website what trackers it works with.

    How would I go about building my own?

    People have home-made basic versions. GPS modules can be purchased which give a reasonably accurate location once per second, or on demand, over a serial, usb, or bluetooth link; many mobile phones have gps modules already built in. Most tracking systems communicate over the cell phone system, either by SMS or mobile data connections. Of course, many mobile data connections are firewalled/NATed, so the benefit of SMS is you can transmit a query to the tracker. The disadvantage is the per-message cost, especially if you want regular location updates, and that it's easier to program the PC end of a mobile data connection. Cell companies also offer "machine to machine" data plans, but it's unlikely they'll want to deal with you if you're making a one-off homebrew system.

    You could get a separate cell phone and GPS and make a homebrew device, like the one linked above, but you're unlikely to get things much more compact than buying a mobile phone with both built in.

    If you're a programmer, my suggestion would be a mobile phone running Android, and using the GPS APIs to read the location and send it off to your server.

    How does a tinfoil hat wearer engineer such a device to make sure Big-Brother isn't watching too?

    Pretty much every mobile tracking system uses the cell phone network for connectivity, because it's more widely available than WiFi, and more affordable than a satellite connection. If you're paranoid about privacy, you should be worried about cell phone triangulation, as that would be the most practical way for "big brother" to track people; so to be paranoid, you can't use a cell phone connection, which will make your design task substantially more difficult. It would be far easier to get a mobile phone, set it up with Google Latitude, turn it off, and tell your daughter to turn it on if she gets lost.

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    1. Re:If you actually want to do this... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      so to be paranoid, you can't use a cell phone connection

      or anything else, for that matter. If they have the clout to track your cell signal through the millions of other cell signals out there, you're not going to shake them by switching to an amateur band solution - you might slow them down by a few days while they cobble together some non-standard tracking gear...

      If you go non-standard, you're actually making it easier for amateurs to track you, whether you play in their designated bands or not. Gear that can triangulate cell signals is highly costly, and only really practical if you have inside access to the cell towers. Available? Yes. But, controlled by people who have the resources to track you 100 other ways if they really want to.

  84. Please don't think of the children. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember folks, it's been said over and over and over again... First it will be tracking criminals, then it will be tracking children for their safety, then it will be tracking the general populous because they grew up with it.

    With technology come vigilance on how it's used and how it could *potentially* be used.

    Humanity, sliding down that slippery slope since 1984.

    1. Re:Please don't think of the children. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      We've been sliding down that slippery slope since the invention of writing.

    2. Re:Please don't think of the children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you have against Macintosh?

    3. Re:Please don't think of the children. by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Humanity, sliding down that slippery slope since 1984.

      We've been sliding down that slippery slope since the invention of writing.

      Oh CRAP. I slid down a slippery slope at a water-park when I was a kid too!

      DAMN YOU, SLIPPERY SLOPES!

    4. Re:Please don't think of the children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've been sliding down that slippery slope since the invention of writing.

      Where is that slope located? i bet we could make a killing by transforming it into a ski resort! such a huge slope MUST be exploited!

    5. Re:Please don't think of the children. by rye · · Score: 1

      First it was tracking consumers. Look at the location histories that public transit agencies store (EZ-Pass, Metro Card, etc), not to mention credit card and cell companies that track and analyze consumer location info for the company's benefit. Money is the greatest motivator.

      After these systems are set up, police realize that they can gain access and use them to track suspects or "terrorists." Once the capabilities are well-publicized, parents get interested and companies spew out spinoff consumer-friendly tracking tools... such as Verizon's Chaperone, which more average people buy... which LE will subsequently take advantage of...

      Every new advance in location tracking technology is an exploitative cycle between the market forces, Big Brother and normal human attachments.

  85. Crime. by EkriirkE · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have her repeatedly commit crimes (theft?) and local law will install an ankle bracelet. With this she should be either placed under house arrest andr hopefully be allowed to go to school. If she ever deviates from either location, law enforcement will contact you and let you know soon to be followed by them escorting her home safely.

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Crime. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Dad would be pretty well a basket case by the time local law enforcement got around to picking up his repeat offender, and I doubt they'd hand her over right away, either.

  86. Introduction to the Telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about giving your daughter some money and teaching her how to make a phone call?

    When I was young my parents made me memorize two very important phone numbers: my home phone and 911.

    If I got lost (which I did once when I was 8 years old) I called home. If no one was home, I called 911.

    Live in a rural area? No problem, get your kid a cell-phone and make sure they understand it's to be used for emergencies only.

  87. For my dog by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1

    I want something like this for one of my dogs.

    One of our dogs is hard to see at night and will take off after a rabbit when on a walk that she will rip the leash from your hand. She will then get her leash tangled in a bush somewhere. Once trapped like this she will remain perfectly quiet for days even if you walk by the bush calling her name. If only she would bark for help we wouldn't have a problem. But she has gotten her self trapped this way several times, and on one occasion spent two nights that way until we found her. (Her silence probably did save her from coyotes, however.)

    A locater would be good, but even something that made a noise would be fine. If we could get a very small cellphone with a ringer only, that would probably do the job. (Maybe we would set the ring tone to a bark.) Anything attached to her collar needs to be small and light enough that she won't try to remove it and cheap enough so that if she does lose or destroy it we will feel okay about replacing it.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    1. Re:For my dog by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Cheap is a relative thing... hound these people and tell them to get their product out the door: http://www.petsmobility.com/ it's been a long time coming.

    2. Re:For my dog by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 1

      Your problem is identical to the OP problem, but you are both looking to find a solution that does not address the problem, it only fixes the symptom.

      What you both need is not a way to track down your lost daughter/dog, but a way to prevent them from getting lost in the first place!

      - The OP needs to address the school district as to why in the hell they keep putting kids on the wrong bus on a regular basis and someone way up on the thread already suggested this (dkleinsc). In the mean time, I'd also take advice from blueZ3 where a better way to approach a solution and also impart useful lessons and skills is to have your daughter learn to ask for help from the appropriate people and learn her home address and number etc...

      - You, (Charles Dodgeson) need to train your dog to not run away when she sees a bunny. Not to insult, but have you ever watched the dog whisperer? I swear that guy is a magician when it comes to dog training. http://www.cesarmillaninc.com/dogwhisperer/

      Just my $0.02

      --
      A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
    3. Re:For my dog by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      I kid you not, real life saver for the dog, reflective tape vest.

      Like so:

      relective tape on the collar
      reflective tape on the vest that says the word DOG
      reflective tape around the ankles

      That way someone at a distance can see the word DOG and the flicker from the feet. Sadly I've seen some monsters actually floor it when they see that (I sat it along a road near my house as a test and the guy in front of me gunned it when he saw that. sicko...)

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    4. Re:For my dog by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Try a small rattle on the collar to simulate rattle snake. That noise scares the hell out of my cats fyi...

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  88. Re:Overprotective git by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hopefully the kind that is hot, isn't camera shy, and releases videos in HD.

  89. #1 priority - security by egburr · · Score: 1

    I can't believe it didn't even make your list of requirements, but I would think the #1 priority would be that nobody, and I do mean nobody, should be able to gain access to the location info/tools without your express authorization, except maybe a confirmed police officer with a stated emergency need for it.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:#1 priority - security by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      That is what #4 is. No one will be able to log onto his domain without his permission. #5 is an added security measure.

    2. Re:#1 priority - security by egburr · · Score: 1

      Kinda. He listed it as "optional" and only said "secure" for his domain. What about all the other features he listed? Yeah, #5 is an added measure, until someone turns it back on...

      Security, especially for a tracking device for a little girl, should be top priority.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    3. Re:#1 priority - security by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree on any particular point, I think it shouldn't have been optional but he did bring it up. He wants a web app that will show the location and the web app will only be located on his domain, thus only people on his domain can use the app, thus its secure. Should it be a higher priority? Definately, but his first concern was of course having it so that no one else knew about the system in the first place. How would anyone know to use a web app that only he has access to, to track down the location of his daughter? Broadcasting the location of his daughter isn't going to be unsafe for his daughter unless someone is looking to kidnap her specifically, in which case they probably already know enough about her daily schedule. I could get a GPS implanted into me broadcasting my Long and Latitude on radio waves out to the world - is that endangering me any? As long as no one is after me, it won't do any harm. If people are after me, they've probably already kidnapped me, in which case it'll help me.

    4. Re:#1 priority - security by egburr · · Score: 1
      Well, if it were a custom job just for him, then I would agree with all you said. However, it's more likely that it would be a service he and others would subscribe to, even if he's the one who builds it. So, now you have a common location known to obtain data for tracking multiple little girls...

      I'm not concerned about someone targeting him (in that case there's probably nothing he can do short of very well paid armed guards), but more about someone looking for anyone using such a service.

      Some of his points:

      1) a small unobtrusive device I can place on my daughter
      And how is that device going to send the location information? Where will it send the information to? How will it identify itself (assuming others are also using this service)?

      2) an application to pull up on any computer
      Note *any* computer.

      3) a handheld device
      And you've never lost your cell phone?

      Where is the service that will obtain the information in (1) and make it available to (2), (3), and (4)? How will other people be prevented from obtaining the same information from (1)?

      Would it be regularly transmitting, or just waiting until it receives a specific query signal? How would that signal be transmitted? I assume that cellular service would be used; otherwise yet another wireless coverage system would have to be implemented wherever this will be available.

      How would I prevent someone aware of this service from making a detection device to drive by and pick up or trigger a signal from the tracking device, so they know there's someone of interest there even if they don't know who?

      How paranoid should you be when your daughter's life is at stake?

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  90. Cell Phone, EOL by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    There's some suggestions for cell phones coupled with GPS options, but you really don't even need that. You can get her a cheap cell phone, and if you want to know where she is, just call her and ask. Get a little trust going, don't spy on her all the time with GPS. If you can't get a hold of her the cell phone can also act as a locator if it's really needed (cell phone companies are required to be able to pin point a phone's location for the police).

    But I think constant GPS surveillance ability on a cell or some sort of other GPS tracking device is really too much.

    1. Re:Cell Phone, EOL by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      There's several cell phones offered with parent/child options just for GPS tracking. It's nice to think that she'll tell you where she is, it's much more useful to be able to know that she left the phone in her cubby at school.

  91. This problem was solved... by Schnoogs · · Score: 1

    ...thousands of years ago when parents combined the naming of their children with yelling at the top of their lungs that dinner is ready.

  92. Not linux but open-source hardware at least... by pozitron969 · · Score: 1

    Since everyone seems to be jumping on the "Slow your roll" bandwagon. I will offer a different suggestion for you. Battery + Arduino + GPS module + cellphone = really complex but possible (I think) solution. Good Luck!

  93. hey slashdot by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    we're talking about a CHILD here. no creeping big brother implied

    it is perfectly ok to track a child by GPS. how can i say such a horrible thing? because we are talking about... yes, you guessed it, a CHILD. it makes a difference. there is no slippery slope: your average intelligence human being can tell the difference between an adult and a child when it comes to accountability and responsibility. as such THERE IS NO SLIPPERY SLOPE. you do not have a monopoly on perceiving common sense obvious differences

    if a kid kills your prized rose bushes, who do you go after? the parents. why? because, legally, morally, and logically, a child's actions are the responsibility and accountability of their parents, because a child is not mentally mature enough to be responsible or accountable. sure there are rare moral savants, 8 year olds who are more accountable and responsible than some 28 year olds, and all children display moments of clarity and lucidity that are adult-level. but on the average, they tend to royally fuck up and make huge mistakes, especially in regard to peer pressure, panic, etc. thus the parent's role in this whole accountability and responsibility thing

    but i await the typical fear-addled slippery slope arguments anyways

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  94. GPS Tagging Kids by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        This is probably a bigger project than you want to take on, and you very likely won't get the result that you think you want.

        There are a few essential parts to what you're looking for.

        1) The GPS receiver, which must have a view of the sky. It'll be hit and miss inside many vehicles, and probably worthless if she's sitting away from the windows in a bus, and unusable in a building. At least you'll have an idea of the building she entered.

        2) The transmitter. You can use a modified alphanumeric pager, but that hopes your modifications are perfect, and aren't prone to failure. You can also use a cell phone or other cellular device (like a USB EVDO modem). Pay attention to the rate plan that you pay for. If it doesn't allow for unlimited data, don't send data once every 5 seconds. If you send data once every 10 to 15 minutes, does that give you the resolution that you require?? 15 minutes is one mile of walking for a normal person (average person's walking rate is 4mph).

        3) Something to process the data to send out.

        4) Something to receive the data (your web server), map it, and display it to you.

        5) Batteries. You'll have a limited lifespan on any device, so it will need recharging nightly.

        I highly recommend one of the obvious choices. Get her a cell phone. Verizon used to sell a Chaperone phone, which only had 4 buttons that you could program. They could be set to say call home, your cell, your wife's cell, and a neighbor. It also sent GPS data up to their server, so you could either view from your Chaperone-Parent phone that was linked to it, or from their web site.

        You could also get any GPS enabled cell phone (not Verizon, they're pissy about enabling GPS), and put a whole variety of applications on it to send updates to somewhere. Even Google Latitude may be an option, but I find sometimes it forgets to check in.

        You could also use something like a Garmin DC 30. That's a GPS tracking device for animals. It has a 17 hour battery life.

        If you're hell bent on building your own, consider this..

        1) You could get an Openmoko phone, which has integrated GPS, accelerometers, and (obviously) cell access. You drop in any GSM SIM from the provider of your choice, and you're online. It does run Linux, so you can write your own script to pull the GPS data, and upload it to the server. It's cute and rubber covered, so it's less likely she'll break it by dropping it. I don't suggest trying too many times though.

        3) You could tie together a Gumstix computer, Gumstix GPS module, Verizon Wireless EVDO USB device, battery pack, and your own scripting to pull the GPS data.

        Writing GPS software isn't impossible. You can open the serial port and read the strings. You have to read multiple strings to get all the data. Then once you have a full dataset, upload it. Alternatively, you can use GPSd, **IF** it will compile for the platform. I've done both, it's up to you to which you use. it was fun writing my own. I'd probably go the GPSd route, since I've already done it, and don't feel the need to reinvent the wheel any more.

        You're not going to find the mythical devices that they use on TV and movies, that are a thread like GPS transmitter to sew into her jacket, that has an infinite battery life, and always sends the exact location, regardless of environmental variables (buildings, clouds, distance from cell networks).

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  95. Google Latitude by LaminatorX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Prepaid cellphone with long standby life in the pocket of her backpack or book bag.Recharge the battery a couple nights a week.Manage the lattitude account yourself to ensure only appropriate monitoring.

    1. Re:Google Latitude by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. This is the best solution.

      Any prepaid with the ability to run Google Maps (besides the iPhone) gets you Google Latitude working, and lets you prevent it from being used as a conventional cellphone. It might also allow you to pick a relatively small device to mitigate burden of always carrying it around.

      If you own the account that it reports to then this satisfies all requirements, 1-6, including it working on Linux (it's a web app), working on your phone (as long it's not an iPhone, it has Google Latitude built-in where you can view her location), and being able to turn it off because you just login to "her" account and disable it. Voila.

  96. Doesn't anyone talk to their kids anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an idea - TRY TALKING TO HER. Oh, nevermind, that won't work by linux. How about sending her a text message?

  97. Cellphone? by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Is she old enough to be responsible with a cellphone? Just do that. If you want to know where she is, you call her, and if something unexpected happens she can call you. Simple.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  98. YOU PEOPLE SUCK!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only did you inadequetly answer the question but you added your own stupid (and very naive) comments that prove you either have no children or have never had that overwhelming sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach when your child doesn't get off the bus as expected. Be glad you live in your nice.... relatively safe places... because where I live kids are often stolen and ransomed back to their parents. Every member of my family is geo-tagged and tracked 24x7. Evil lives in your neighborhoods too... you just cant see past the disguise yet.

  99. Wow. by TheDarkener · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just think of when your kid gets old enough to realize you're tracking her every move. Do you think that's going to go over well with her? What if you want to keep it on her to make sure she's not going to any "unacceptable" parties? There's a BIG consequence in doing something like this, in the parent/child relationship.

    I'd go w/everyone else and say "Get her a cell phone". There are plenty out there for kids that lock down so they can't call foreign countries and text 1000s of times to her friends. Simple. If she's in trouble or lost, she can call you. No need to go CIA on her.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Wow. by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      I never said I wanted to track her every move. I want to know she's gets from school to daycare safely. Hence being able to track her from point a to b once a day, when the school is supposed to send her to daycare, is all I need.

    2. Re:Wow. by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      I never said I wanted to track her every move. I want to know she's gets from school to daycare safely. Hence being able to track her from point a to b once a day, when the school is supposed to send her to daycare, is all I need.

      But you see, it's not a "But I only track her from here to here" thing. It's on or off, all or nothing. I don't doubt your intentions one bit as a parent. But the implications of having a GPS type device on your daughter is frighteningly prone to abuse, by you later on when you feel like you should be tracking her more places, OR by someone else (a tech savvy child molester, for instance). You need to think that no technology is completely secure..and when you have something like this, the stakes go WAY up as far as your child's safety.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:Wow. by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      I never said I wanted to track her every move. I want to know she's gets from school to daycare safely. Hence being able to track her from point a to b once a day, when the school is supposed to send her to daycare, is all I need.

      But you see, it's not a "But I only track her from here to here" thing. It's on or off, all or nothing. I don't doubt your intentions one bit as a parent. But the implications of having a GPS type device on your daughter is frighteningly prone to abuse, by you later on when you feel like you should be tracking her more places,

      I've helped raise my wife's two former teenage daughters without needing to do that, but had the ability. Power doesn't corrupt everyone, but you're right there is that risk. Although, one really needed it. Both are now adults with their own kids.

      ...and when you have something like this, the stakes go WAY up as far as your child's safety.

      Total BS. Child molestors aren't looking for gps devices to hack into to locate children. It's fairly easy to track children if you want to molest them. Get a job in a field that deals with kids, and you'll have an endless supply. Buy a home in a neighborhood with lots of young couples and children and you'll have a a cornucopia of children to target, etc.

      My primary concern is to keep her from: getting attacked by loose dogs, and getting run over, falling down a hole, eating poison berries, lost in a wooded area, etc. While abduction is also a danger, regardless of statistics.

      While I teach my daughter things like: don't eat berries off plants, don't talk to strange people, do talk to the police and firefighters, look both ways before crossing a street, etc. At five these rules don't get the respect they deserve and are often neglected when distracted. Five year olds are easily distracted.

  100. Re:Lojack for Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeze, just about everyone commenting on this post are acting like total assholes.

    Have any of you ever tried to 'just get the school to fix' anything? Good frikken luck.

    Big brother? Perhaps he isn't trying to spy on his 17 year old. I don't believe he posted his daughters age. What if she is 8 years old? Just give her a cell phone and shut up?

    I agree that people are too paranoid in many respects these days, but what is so unreasonable about wanting something you could sew into a backpack or a shoe for an emergency? Technology is supposed to help us with problems. Why should we worry about our missing children when a new solution might be possible? You do this kind of thing with cars, laptops, pets for chrissakes. But your kid? Stop whining. Just have another.

    I could see a system like this for places like Disney. Get a bracelet for your kid and find them at the nearest locating station.

  101. kids are masters at losing things by hey · · Score: 1

    I have a kid and everything that he takes to school eventually gets lost. So far this school year its been 3 insulated lunch bags. I am glad it wasn't 3 cell phones or GPS trackers.

  102. pretty typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having kids get on the wrong bus is pretty typical for the first couple of weeks of school. The teachers, staff and especially the kids are still figuring it all out. Once a routine has been set in place, there shouldn't be too many more problems.

    The best solution to this problem isn't hardware, it's wetware i.e. people. The teachers and staff of an elementary school are your best resource. The part you are missing, as mentioned many times previous in these comments is some teaching and direction from you for your daughter. If you choose to use some technology in this endeavor, great, but just remember it's the people involved that will help you most and that includes your daughter.

  103. Child Rustling by sashapup · · Score: 2, Funny

    I prefer my children to be more free-ranged. Ear tag and brand them to allow for quick identification should someone attempt to horn-in on my 'herd'.

    Seriously.... This isn't a tech problem, this is a human problem. Get on the school district's case about this through any and all public means.

    --
    Excellent.
    1. Re:Child Rustling by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Get on the school district's case about this through any and all public means.

      Good luck with that. They have decades of experience in deflecting these concerns and continuing service at the status quo level.

    2. Re:Child Rustling by hurfy · · Score: 1

      "I prefer my children to be more free-ranged. Ear tag and brand them to allow for quick identification should someone attempt to horn-in on my 'herd'. "

      lol, i think we have a couple tattoo artists for customers i could sell those to if you have extras.....

  104. Low tech solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The time honored way of dealing with this issue is to have redundant children.

    If you live in one of the red countries on this map you are probably not having enough children anyhow. If things don't change, in a couple of hundred years your culture will be gone.

  105. I recommend Home-schooling. by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    Home-school your kids instead. Seriously. Not only will the school district not lose your kids, they can't turn their heads to mush with go-green (environmentalist) or go-red (socialist) or go-blank (subjectivist) drek, either.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  106. APRS by teevoh · · Score: 1

    Since you didn't say what grade your daughter was in, I'll assume elementary school. Spend a lot of time and teach her to get a Technician class amateur radio license. Then plant one of these "unobtrusive" things on her. Tada, you now have a mobile tracking system. Go to GoogleAPRS or JfindU to keep an eye on her. Or just do what everyone else says; raise a stink at the PTA meetings.

  107. Paranoid by Animats · · Score: 1

    Just get the kid a cell phone, already.

    There's a market catering to paranoid parents, but it's small. Disney bailed out of cell phones in 2007. Whereify, with a GPS watch and tracking system, gave it up a few years ago. (Whereify watches were for the really paranoid. They couldn't be removed without a signal from central control, and if the band was cut or the device damaged, alarms went off.)

    The available devices all need charging or battery replacement. That's one advantage of getting the kid a cell phone. They'll keep it charged themselves.

    As for the school, get them to put useful destination signs on their buses. Some schools get sloppy about that.

  108. They need to lose the bone by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    http://www.petsmobility.com/ perfect product for tracking and recovery. They will get smaller with time, but you really need the cell phone component in order to find the lost mammal.

  109. Some of us didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really amazing how any of us, and humanity in general, ever lived past their 10th birthday without all the 'safety' gear that is available now.

    Some of us didn't. I did, and you did, but some people died who could have been saved by modern safety standards and today's technology.

    1. Re:Some of us didn't by logicassasin · · Score: 1

      Some of us didn't. I did, and you did, but some people died who could have been saved by modern safety standards and today's technology. ... And yet, some of us STILL won't even with a GPS device, under skin implanted biochip, cellular transmitting heart monitor triggered by a rapid rise in heart rate, and ocular implant video transmitter and listening aparatus so we can see exactly what the child sees and hear what they hear.

      It takes less than a few minutes for some deranged pedophile to snatch, rape, and kill a kid. FAR faster than any amount of technology can react.

      --
      Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    2. Re:Some of us didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really amazing how any of us, and humanity in general, ever lived past their 10th birthday without all the 'safety' gear that is available now.

      Some of us didn't. I did, and you did, but some people died who could have been saved by modern safety standards and today's technology.

      Yes, they call it "natural selection."

  110. Other recommendations... by probityrules · · Score: 1

    Homeschool:

    1) Not needed - just look at her.
    2) Allows you to see the real-time position of your daughter in precision 3d detail.
    3) All appropriate information available without using any devices
    4) Take her with you anyplace in the world
    5) Stop looking at her.
    6) Hmmm ... ... not sure about this ...

    1. Re:Other recommendations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7) PROFIT!

  111. Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My daughter started carrying a cell phone in 6th grade for precisely this reason. It's paid off three times: Twice she got on the wrong school bus, and once we lost her in the press of the crowd during a parade. (That was really scary.)

    Before GPS became common, I had to rely on her description of where she was. Once (the parade incident) she had to go into a store and ask the attendant for the address. (I discourage her from asking strangers on the street, and she's afraid of the police, due to an incident a few years earlier, so we compromised on convenience store attendants. It wasn't a perfect solution.)

    Now, none of that is necessary. She carries a Blackberry Curve and I can check her location via Google Latitude on my own Blackberry. She knows that this is not because I don't trust her, but because I don't trust everyone else. Besides, she can also see my location, which forestalls "Daddy, when are you going to get here?"

    There are other tracking services, but Latitude was good enough for our purpose, and free.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by charlesgodwin · · Score: 1

      This doesn't cover "anywhere in the world" Of course to do that you'd need a satellite phone for up link data and I doubt if a child could carry all the gear, and definitely not unobtrusively. Or does your "anywhere in the world" really cover the lower 48 where cell service is provided>?

    2. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you explain the whole scared-of-the-police thing? When I was a kid, first preference was to talk to a police officer if you're in trouble...

    3. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      you do realize that if someone was to abduct her the first thing they would do is probably throw the phone in the back of a passing pickup truck.

      With kids you need something that is going to be concealed. I've read letter from pedophiles when I was studying criminal justice. The first thing they look for is a phone (and usually toss the backpack in a remote location as a red herring.)

      I suggest something that resembles jewlery like a pendant. In the most grim of situations there is a chance the attacker would keep it as a trophy and at least find the monster. Same with teddy bears or anything that would seem personal to the child.

      Hell the black berry would stick out like a sore thumb. Even something built into a shoe or belt... earrings if they are old enough...

      As creepy as it is I think chipping people till 18 is a damn good idea. Throw out an Amber Alert and have positioning systems with good coverage.

      Activate the Amber Alert and have a Google map EVERYONE can see the location of the reported child within a few hundred yards.

      Hell the infrastructure wouldn't be too hard to deploy if you needed supplimental sensors (e.g. the overpass signs on the highway could be part of the sensor network with a 1/2 mile radius for instance.

      From what I remember it is the first 6 hours that matter most in abductions and I wouldn't mind having my kids (if I had any) being chipped till 18. You could by the same token load the bus with an expected passenger manifest and scan each student as they got on with a report available (bus driver can then ask "are you sure your supposed to be on this bus? It says you are supposed to be on the Blue Hippo bus not the Yellow Giraff bus")

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    4. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Don't trust anybody. Best way to get through life.

    5. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I discourage her from asking strangers on the street

      Unrealistic threat assessment. The odds of a random person she approaches being evil are almost infinitely lower than the odds of someone whom approaches her being evil. Or, given the ratio of male to female predators, just tell her to ask a female, any female.

      she's afraid of the police

      Sadly, a realistic threat assessment for people of any age, not just kids.

      compromised on convenience store attendants. It wasn't a perfect solution

      Why? I think that's perfect. The odds of a random store clerk being evil are very low. In any transaction of evil, everyone knows she's on the surveillance camera, so thats kind of a downer for that plan. Most service clerks would love to help, hoping you'll say or write something nice to the boss or the newspapers. Its easy for you to find the store, gas stations are not exactly hidden from the street, and you've probably been there before so you know exactly where it is. Short of a donut store or a police station, I can't think of a more likely place to find a cop, hopefully a good one. Tell the kid, walk in the store, stand in front of the camera, and don't leave until you arrive. Away from the unfamiliar street means low odds of car accident. Most convenience stores are basically the same around the world, so no matter how lost she is, she'll be in semi-familiar surroundings, reducing panic and the bad decisions resulting in panic. Very hard to do better....

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...She knows that this is not because I don't trust her, but because I don't trust everyone else.

      Wow, there's a lesson I'm not planning on teaching my kids.

    7. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by aaandre · · Score: 1

      Makes sense to have a trust-based, full-disclosure solution between a parent and child where the child participates in the agreement.

    8. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy crap. you are doing this to an almost teenage girl and you think you will get away with it? she's going to hate you the next couple of years anyways. why make it last into her twenties?

    9. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > you do realize that if someone was to abduct her the first thing they would do is probably throw the phone in the back of a passing pickup truck.

      Oddly enough, criminals often aren't that smart. I've read about several cases where the kid was able to make a call after being abducted. While some have proven to be fakes, some are legit.

      But a subcutaneous device, (assuming it would work like lojack and not like current chipping, which can only be detected from a few feet away) can still be detected and removed. I imagine when "Taken" is remade in a few years, there will be a scene of impromtu surgery during the abduction. If an abductor is smart enough to search the kid for a cell phone, then, well, you get the idea.

      And, in any case, the most common function of the device is for me to find her when she's lost, or a way for her to communicate to me or someone in a lockdown situation, and only secondarily for tracking an abduction. It's a matter of managed risk.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    10. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Ok, to a certain extent that was hyperbole, but you know what I mean.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    11. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know if there's some sort of service where you can call someone and have the GPS in your phone send your position to the person you're calling?

      That way it's not like you're being tracked, but if you get lost you can give someone a call and say "I'm lost, but here are my coordinates."

    12. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      What specifically is the issue? We agree that I can know her whereabouts only to protect her, not to pry. I'm not sitting in the Bat Cave tracking her every move. We have a high degree of trust anyway -- she tells me everything -- so it's not an issue between us. Or is that not what you're saying?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    13. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok wait, lets go through this.

      * 6th Grade means 11-13 years old.
      * Twice on the wrong school bus being 11-13 years old
      * Lost at a parade at 11-13 years old.
      * Afraid of the police? Afraid? What sort of incident makes you afraid of the police? Distrust should be the word you use?
      * And you track your now teen aged daughter...

      Ok, 6th grade, still taking the bus to school. (presumably she is now older, still taking a bus?) A little old to be taking a bus to school? (Apologizes if the school is further than 5 miles, anything less, they need to walk)
      Now, a 12 year old getting lost at a parade? Seriously? Have you not taught her to keep aware of her surroundings? To keep people shes with in eye sight if she doesn't get lost?
      Afraid? Seriously Afraid? Great. Now when shes raped because she got lost and turned down a dark alley she won't report it because shes afraid of the police. Her house is burgled and everything is stolen, no report because shes "afraid" of the police. Get some thearpy for this. You should NEVER be afraid of the police. Distrust yes. afraid no. Different emotions there. A huge difference.
      And your now tracking on a regular basis your teenaged daughter.

      Jesus, your as messed up as the Article poster. Let your child grow up. Cut the Umbilical. They'll be smarter for it, and happier in life. and as a bonus, you won't be creating more offspring that are afraid of everyday life and pushing those ideals on MY children and grandchildren.

      - A parent of 5 children, 4 adults now and 1 in Highschool. None of them need Therapy and are all well adjusted adults.

    14. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Ok, this is really off topic, so feel free to mark it such. It was an incident when she was almost four years old. I had her on my hip at a Cinco De Mayo celebration downtown one year, and apparently some of the local cops didn't like my looks. Four cops in body armor surrounded me and demanded my ID. I set the kid down, and she clung to me while I proved who I was. I thought it was just a case of mistaken identity, but they persisted in harassing me, insulting me, shoulder- and chest-bumping me, apparently trying to elict a response. This went on for a long time. After awhile they grudgingly gave my papers back and wandered off, still trash-talking.

      We immediately left and never went back there again. I'm reluctant now to take my family into the city for any event, so we pretty much stick to the suburbs. My daughter was deeply traumatized by the incident and has been fearful of people in uniform ever since. She's older now and the fear is mostly gone, but she still distrusts police to this day. (Arguably, she gets some of this attitude to me, as I was really freaked out by the incident also.)

      Oddly, there was one woman officer in the group, and she was the most aggressive and had the foulest mouth.

      No, I really don't know what the deal was. I've never had that kind of experience with police, before or since. I did some research, and that particular police force had had a bad rep before the incident. That was years ago and I don't know what they're like now, don't really want to know. I guess their slogan was "destroying our public image, one citizen at a time".

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    15. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      True, but I wonder if the original requester really meant "anywhere in the world". I think you could probably do "anywhere there is modern cell service" (IE, GPRS), but true "anywhere in the world" equipment would need a backpack at least.

      I think some respondents are under the erroneous impression that there's a chip you can inject into someone's butt to track them anywhere on earth. If anything like that really existed, it'd be highly specialized and require a huge infrastructure to support. Only governments could afford it, and maybe not even that in this economy. Us normal humans are limited to more pedestrian technology.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    16. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm probably putting too much effort into this but ok...

      * Twice on the wrong school bus being 11-13 years old

      It's complicated. She and a bunch of students take a bus to a hub and transfer there. Then they all transfer at a different hub on the way home. That's four buses round trip and the hubs are usually a madhouse. I dunno why -- ask the school district.

      * Lost at a parade at 11-13 years old.

      That was a little younger, and she was carrying a (non-GPS) loaner at the time. We were attending an event in a strange town and got separated. She called me and got an attendant to tell me where she was. This was what decided us to make the arrangement permanent. She got her own phone on her next birthday.

      * Afraid of the police? Afraid? What sort of incident makes you afraid of the police? Distrust should be the word you use?

      Afraid when she was younger, distrust now. I've covered this elsewhere. She was traumatized, and although has mostly gotten over it, still avoids police. I didn't cause this, the police did. Talk to them.

      * And you track your now teen aged daughter...

      Hyperbole. She willingly carries a device that allows me to know her position in an emergency. (The side benefit for her was having her own cell phone at a young age.) I do *not* track her. I trust her and don't feel the need. I've used it to come get her when she's stuck or lost. What parent wouldn't do that if they could?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    17. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Now, none of that is necessary. She carries a Blackberry Curve and I can check her location via Google Latitude on my own Blackberry. She knows that this is not because I don't trust her, but because I don't trust everyone else. Besides, she can also see my location, which forestalls "Daddy, when are you going to get here?"

      While I fall into the don't overreact -crowd here, I have to say that given your implementation of mutual monitoring/information sharing it's much more sensible. I like the idea that while you can see her location she can see yours too. Not sure I'd want my own kids tracking me though... :)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    18. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Yes I was thinking more Lojack rather then the rice sized RFDI type.

      A transmitter powerful enough to be detected outside of a van or similar vechicle is not going to be under-the-skin but a tad larger. There are several locations where a quarter sized impant could go. Unless we are talking very sophisticated criminals they would first have to try and figure out where the transmitter is and remove it.

      The problem with impants is that motivates the abductors to multilate their victim in an effort to remove the chipping quickly when even if the child is recovered the hack surgery attempts pose a serious infection and survivability issue (Not to mention mental trauma).

      Yeah 'Taken' had me wondering quite a few things about that scenario. A possible location would be on the upper portion of the hip bone where the scar could double as an apendix scar. With a device small enough and with enough possible locations if could pose a life saver.

      Based on some crude math though, the transmitter has to have a range of at least 5 miles and detectors need to be placed at least every 3 miles. Assuming a perfect grid over the United States (as an example) I don't see it being viable after crunching the numbers. Too many dead zones emerge in rural areas. Any transmitter larger and the device would be considerably larger then a quarter and you still are replacing the batteries every year or two...

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    19. Re:Blackberry and Latitude by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > A transmitter powerful enough to be detected outside of a van or similar vechicle is not going to be under-the-skin but a tad larger. There are several locations where a quarter sized impant could go. Unless we are talking very sophisticated criminals they would first have to try and figure out where the transmitter is and remove it.

      I think the basic problem here is that anything that's transmitting can be detected with less sophisticated (cheaper) equipment than that necessary to track and decode the signal. I imagine kidnappers as catching up with the technology very quickly, and then there's no place you can go -- as long as it's transmitting, no matter how sophisticated the transmitter, merely detecting and locating the transmission is relatively easy. Even if it's not transmitting at the time, locating a metal implant is fairly easy. Nope, all I can see homing implants causing is routine mutilation during kidnappings. It's one of those things that's useful only while it's rare and unknown.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  112. Tagging your kid due to someone elses incompetence by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, your willing to spend your precious time, money, and resources due to the incompetence of the school system - which you pay for in your taxes to begin with? I can understand if your sending your kids to a school in a high-crime neighborhood, but I doubt that's the case.

    Talk to the school district. Ask why these mistakes happen in the first place, and make sure these mistakes don't happen. You shouldn't need to put your kids under surveillance "for their own protection" if there is someone who is supposed to be responsible for the safety and well being of your children.

    As for a "Child Locating System", a $20 prepaid cellular phone with call restrictions so the phone can only call home should suffice. That way, all the child has to do is call "HOME" or "MOM" and describe where they are (Or, if the child is actually in trouble, the police should be able to locate the child using the data from the phone).

  113. Check yourself first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be careful about how much of this "side project" is being driven by a genuine need, and how much is being driven by a love for technology.

  114. the fallacy of the slippery slope by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    "Well my parents changed my diapers for me as a child and I was fine, so lets let the government change my underwear"

    "Well my parents turned my television off at 10 pm as a child and I was fine, so lets let the government control our televisions"

    "Well my parents spanked me as a child and I was fine, so lets let the government deliver corporal punishment"

    etc., etc.

    none of these things happen, or are widely accepted by the public, simply because, get this: your average person can tell the difference between an adult and a child and that different policies should apply to them. i sound like i am being pedantic, but i have to state the excruciatingly obvious because your entire slippery slope argument depends upon the idea that no one can tell the difference between an adult and a child conceptually except you. why do you think you alone possess some magic perception of the dumbfoundingly obvious and that you need to remind everyone else of it or else everyone will forget a child and an adult are different?

    this shows a poor consideration for your fellow man. not of the general snobbish "i am superior to joe blow" variety of poor consideration, but more like the "i am the only sentient being" variety of poor consideration. sorry, other people can think and recognize the obvious too, and so no, there is no slippery slope because the boundaries are clear and the context is clear about how this is being applied. no, there will be no gradual acceptance of gps trackers in adults simply because they are in kids, just like there is no gradual acceptance of governments changing our underwear or turning off our tvs. and no, sorry, i already see the counterargument coming, so let me head it off right now: if you do find some policy that sounds like the government is treating adults like children, this is a failure of logic in its own right, NOT some consequence of how some child somewhere was treated by his parents

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the fallacy of the slippery slope by RingDev · · Score: 1

      I think the issue is less of a "Government will..." and more of a "Society will..."

      Government is an echo of society with a number of players sticking their fingers in to turn a profit. So while this one girl's experiences won't likely change the government, it will lead to a generational gap in the social norms of human tracking.

      If she is okay with it, and 20 some years down the she has a couple of kids heading to school, will she think back to her own tracking and figure it's a good idea for her kids? She propagates the idea to some of her friends, and you go from having 1 girl tracked, to a dozen kids tracked. And every year the idea spreads and with every generation it becomes more ubiquitous.

      Until eventually, there is just enough social acceptability for the idea that a few cunning businessmen with political connections manage to get laws passed. Think of the children! All safely tracked by Acme child trackers. And of course Acme is turning a huge profit thanks to the government contracts, and they are donating handsomely to the senators that supported them.

      Sure, it will just start with young kids. Then tweens and teens. Then parolees. Then registered sex offenders. Then habitual non-violent criminals. Then speeders. Slowly but surely, their use will become more and more wide spread.

      These are interesting times we live in.

      As for the OP, I'd say teach your daughter her home address, and help her memorize her bus number. All schools have spikes in kids on the wrong buses at the start of new class cycles. After a week, most kids will have their numbers memorized and they will know a few of the kids that they ride the bus with and it won't be an issue. At least, not until this fall when they start up with the regular school year and new bus routes come out.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:the fallacy of the slippery slope by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 1

      "Well my parents turned my television off at 10 pm as a child and I was fine, so lets let the government control our televisions"

      Your government doesn't control television? You must not live in America.

      "Well my parents spanked me as a child and I was fine, so lets let the government deliver corporal punishment"

      Your government doesn't deliver corporal punishment? You must not live in America.

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  115. Options if tracking is what you want to do by mgwmgw · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Options if tracking is what you want to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wherify is about to go under - I'm actually surprised they are still trading.

    2. Re:Options if tracking is what you want to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With my tinfoil hat on I might be a little leery of the things that use cellphones or websites. It seems they might be making that information public on a wider scale than needs to be.
      I wonder if a dog tracker could do the same thing. Garmin has one, 7 mile range, looks like the collar sends it's position to the receiver on some radio frequency. Yes, that could be listened to, but it would be rather obscure thing to listen for. Your child would just need to keep the collar in her backpack. 7 miles is probably about the range for a sub-urban school district. I'd expect rural kids to be tougher and thus this wouldn't be a concern, and urban kids would have public transportation, and thus would just need a few subway tokens.

    3. Re:Options if tracking is what you want to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see someone actually respond to the post instead of flipping out about particular parenting styles.

  116. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SERIOUS SOLUTION :

    Have you verified with your cell phone provider to see if they deliver this kind of service ? Many cell phones today include GPS functionallity and some cell phone providers allow you to add a feature that gives you exactly what you need :

      - Tracking from a computer of someone else in your plan
      - Tracking from your own cell phone someone else in your plan

  117. One step closer to ... by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

    I need to just mention this to my wife and I am one step closer to Divorce, with a court order asking me to stay 10 miles away from both(wife and daughter) of them.

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    1. Re:One step closer to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how can you stay 10 miles away, without knowing where she is? She obviously needs a tracking device!

  118. cell phone. by zod1025 · · Score: 1
    The only solution to this problem is to have the subject transmit its coordinates to a server. Your "small, unobtrusive device" then becomes a combination of GPS receiver and cell phone. There is no other option. The software used is largely irrelevant.

    THUS, you are best served in this case by getting her a cell phone and teaching her what to do if she gets lost. Preferably a cellphone that already has some of these features available.

    I have implemented such a system myself for my company, although for vehicle location rather than people. We use off-the-shelf USB dongles on a laptop, and we have a client app on the laptop that "phones home" every few seconds with the updated positions. A server side app allows plotting points on the map (research Google Maps or Microsoft Virtual Earth). It's very neat, and I'm sure its exactly what you want for your daughter... but since you would want her carrying around a "small device" rather than a laptop anyway, you're looking at a cellphone.

    --

    -ZOD-
  119. We use pictures by DnemoniX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A) Yes you are overreacting
    B) This is pretty easy to fix

    As a parent in a city with 36 different schools and countless buses I know what you mean. But there is no reason to tag your little girl. All buses look alike, big yellow with numbers on the side. To make things easy and to avoid duplicate numbers from different bus providers they put a picture in the bus window on colored paper. So your kid might ride bus "Blue Hammer", So obviously the sign is on blue paper with a big picture of a hammer. If your kid manages to get on the wrong bus with that system, either they are not paying attention or they might need that "special" bus.

    1. Re:We use pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has your school district thought to teach the children numbers? I assure you, they will benefit from knowing them for much more than bus differentiation.

  120. Why Stop There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why stop there? Why not put and RFID chip under her skin? In fact, I predict that within ten years you will be deemed an unfit parent if you don't.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  121. Wow. Just... wow. by ddillman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am SO glad I'm not your kid. Yeah, its nice you care about your child and where they are, but this is so far above and beyond, I can't begin to express. Did your parents track your every move? If so, how did that make you feel?

    --
    Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
  122. Age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At what age is a child responsible enough to get on and off the correct bus?
      Answer: 6 yrs old.

    How did I come to this?
      a) At 6, I walked to and from school over a mile from home.
      b) At 6.5, we moved to a new state and I walked about 2 miles to and from school - including the first day.
      c) In Iceland, I understand children take mass transit to school daily without issue. I also understand that most adults on MTR help to ensure the kids get on and off the correct trains.
      d) As I got older, we moved again and I had to catch the correct bus. That came down to learning the bus placement in the queue, bus number and bus driver.

    If this is a special needs child, perhaps writing the bus number on the forehead "BUS 32" would help? That would certainly be cheaper than a $10/month cell phone plan for a child.

    BTW, I still can't believe all the parents who give their kids cell phones regardless of the age. For 10,000 years, children didn't have cell phones and seemed to get along just fine. Paying any amount, but especially $500/yr or more seems crazy to me. Put that money into their college savings plan instead. Please.

  123. easy. by ralfg33k · · Score: 1

    Just nick the Marauder's Map from Filch's office.

  124. Re:FWIW, searching Google for "subcutaneous GPS".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... yields 36,9000 hits.

    Would that be 9,036 or 45,000 hits?

    "Come to our BBBQ: The extra B stands for BYOBB"
    "What's that extra B for?"
    "That's a typo."

  125. It's called your child's brain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teach your child what bus she should be on. The brain is already there, you just have to program it.

  126. With all those distros... by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...surely there's a Linux distro just for this sort of thing?

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  127. buy, not build by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Unless you're relentlessly geeky, don't try to build or assemble such a system. There are commercial solutions out there, pick one of those. Why depend on an amateur solution for your daughter's safety?

    The simplest solution is to give the child a cell phone with GPS as a birthday present. I know, cell phones aren't allowed in many schools, but if it's a small one and she can put it on "ignore" and hide it on her person or in her backpack, for use before or after school, no harm no foul.

    And -- this is important -- that cell may be key if there's ever an incident at the school. The most chilling text message I ever got from my daughter was that there had been a shooting and the school was in lockdown. (It turned out ok, but that's a message I wouldn't wish on anyone.) That's what brought it home to me. It's not just the news, it can happen to you too.

    As it happens, my daughter's current school does allow cell phones, but they are absolutely forbidden at her summer camp. Screw that -- I tell her to put it in the bottom of her luggage and make sure nobody sees it.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:buy, not build by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      This is in reply just to the part about summer camp. I do appreciate your reasoning, but I hope you tell her she can't just call you whenever she wants while at camp. Your camp may be different but at the one I worked at (and attended as a kid) we were in the wilderness and part of the point was to get away from the ubiquitous technology in regular life.

      Obviously, you're free to parent as you like, and the camp your daughter goes to is probably a lot different than mine. However, as someone with a lot of experience in that area, perhaps you'll appreciate that there are actually several good reasons to not allow cell phones at camp.

      Now, my camp was actually in a pretty remote location, and only in the past couple of years has sporadic cell service been available, so it hasn't been a huge problem. Still, I knew that a lot of kids brought their cell phones, and I confiscated them if they caused problems. As you can imagine, "illicit" devices like that can cause quite a stir among kids, especially if they were cool phones. Next thing you know, showing off turns into fights and broken/lost/stolen phones. Sounds like an exaggeration, but it really does happen. Kids are like that.

      Besides that, and more importantly, you send your kid to camp to learn independence and all that great stuff. Don't ruin it by giving her a way out - make sure she only uses the phone if there really is an emergency, not just because she's homesick.

      And the great thing is, after spending a lot of time away from technology while at camp, a lot of kids find they're less addicted to their cell phones and video games than they were before! I love my electronics as much as anyone here, but the benefits of that should be pretty obvious.

    2. Re:buy, not build by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > This is in reply just to the part about summer camp. I do appreciate your reasoning, but I hope you tell her she can't just call you whenever she wants while at camp. Your camp may be different but at the one I worked at (and attended as a kid) we were in the wilderness and part of the point was to get away from the ubiquitous technology in regular life.

      Understood, but this is today's world we live in, and a bunch of sequestered teenage girls with no communication to the outside world, presided over by a woman in her early twenties with no security experience is... say it with me... a target. Again, it's about managed risk, and having a cell at hand in case of emergency (there is service, I checked) is not an unreasonable precaution. She knows she's not to use it unless there's an emergency, and so far there hasn't been one. She doesn't get homesick.

      My objection is not to forbid casual cell usage at camp -- I see the reasoning. What I object to is the camp's rules deliberately putting the kids in a state of complete helplessness. It's not necessary.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  128. What about college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with this type of thing is there's no end.

    If your going to track at that young age... what's the cut off? At what age does this end?

    Where does the over-parenting stop? When they can read? First date? First time they have sex (please don't take part in that)? Sometime after?

    Seems the best approach is the one that statistically worked well for thousands of years: teach your kid to think on their feet and have good decision skills regardless of age.

    Otherwise they will never become smart enough for a /. account. Stuck on MySpace for eternity.

  129. Most people watch their children's activities and by Rendus · · Score: 1

    movement with a new invention, Eyeballs. Use them. They're free, and meant for watching your crotchspawn.

  130. Reminds me of Woz' Wheels of Zeus by andika · · Score: 1

    why did it shut down? too early? too intrusive?

  131. It's all out there by CaptainTux · · Score: 1
    You're right, all of the technology you need for such a system is already on the market. It's just about tying in together in a way that works for you and your situation. The hardest part of this system will be the device your daughter wears. It's got to be small, unobtrusive, and not something that she has a compelling reason to leave behind. If she has a mobile phone, I'd look at using that. If not, you might want to look at some sort of weatherized GPS device sewn into the lining of her backpack. There are also devices that you can buy that disguise themselves as bracelets, necklaces, and the like.

    For the purposes of this discussion, I'm going to assume you're going to use a mobile phone. It's cheap ($40), easy, and the entire system can take you less than a few hours to setup. Taking this route, here's what you'll need:

    1. A cheap GPS enabled mobile phone. I recommend the $40 Boost Mobile phone. Unlimited data for about $20 a month IIRC and you don't need a voice plan unless you want one. This will be the tracking device.

    2. GPSTracker software from www.instamapper.com. This software is free and allows you to track phones in realtime from the web. It also offers an API that you could develop a web app against to extend tracking abilities if you needed.

    3. Another mobile phone (Blackberry, iPhones, Windows Mobile, doesn't matter) that you can use as a mobile locator device.

    Once you've got all the pieces in place, install the GPSTracker on your daughters mobile phone. This will now allow you to track her in real time from the web or any web/JavaScript enabled mobile phone. Because you might have a bit of trouble with the real time web updating on the the device you're using to track her, you might want to write an actual piece of software for your mobile that does real time updating a bit better than the web app.

    That done, you're set to go and you can find your daughter wherever she is on earth from wherever you are.

    Now, to address your 'big brother' question: forget it. The government RUNS the GPS system. They have complete access to it if they need it. There is no way make sure they can't track too. It's either an acceptable risk and you do it or it's not.

    Overall, this is a cool project. Good luck with it and good job in wanting to keep your daughter safe.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  132. Make it illegal for parents to use it... by Sabathius · · Score: 1

    Make the system so that only the police or a government agency can use the system (and only then during emergencies), not the parent. It should be illegal for the parents to use it. Think about what I'm saying before flaming me in response.

  133. Homeschool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teach your kid at home and don't rely on the government for any of it.

  134. 6 year old with diabetes by bachnit37 · · Score: 1

    I have struggled with this myself since my six year old has diabetes. He is just starting to spread his wings and wants to go play in the park with his siblings and friends. We always make sure to check his blood before he leaves but we still worry. I purchased a G1 Dev Phone this year and have written a small program that if it receives an SMS message of "Ping" from me it will auto respond with his latitude/longitude. Now I'm just waiting for some cheaper/smaller phones to be released.

  135. Special Needs? by tburke261 · · Score: 1

    I could see a solution like the OP describes being useful for parents with special-needs children. Often children with autism or similar conditions are sent to a regular school, but with different conditions.

  136. Wrong Forum for this question by Slate99 · · Score: 1

    You would assume that this would be a great place to have a civil discussion on technology providing safety for children. Unfortunately that is not the case. It has been my experience that the readers of this forum tend to be paranoid. They are afraid of monitoring of any type, as you can tell from the many posts suggesting that you are somehow over reacting. Big brother is mentioned more in the /. forum than anywhere else on the planet... This is a group who really is afraid of having someone look at them without their knowledge and this overwhelming fear extends to others by proxy. To actually answer your question; I can't help a lot. I did some research last year on devices for my children and decided that a cell phone is not a bad idea, but, in my case, it is going to have to wait a few years so that the little ones can appreciate the value of the device and not lose it. Check out what Verizon has to offer. That is what I did. -I think a lot of the posters here have never known the heart dropping feeling of haveing a lost child (even for a minute)... If they had, the posts would not have been so glib. Good luck in your hunt.

  137. What other recommendations do you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teach your daughter. If she can tell who she is, where she lives, maybe a phone number... then she can, with the help of someone older than her, find you.

    You are looking at it the wrong way. Unless you inplant the device in her body (not something I advise, maintanance and stuff), she can/will lose it.

    If she can find you, this problem doesn't exist.

    A man/woman with the wrong ideas will probably plant the device in some strangers pocket when he/she discovers it.

    Also, having to wear a tracking device is a punishment in my country. Only jailtime is harsher. If I had to wear such a thing as a child, I'd become paranoid. Or maybe I'd get a false feeling of security ("they will come and get me if I get stuck somewhere") and go on adventure trips on my own.

  138. How long before... by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    slashdotters start bragging they have compiled custom Linux kernel that runs on their kid?

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  139. The "High Visibility" Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your daughter a cell phone and a backpack. In the backpack goes a metal storm unit loaded with flares. Have the cell phone activate the unit and away you go.

  140. I think I've heard this song before... by rpresser · · Score: 1

    I *swear* this is how one of Dr. Doofenshmirtz's schemes got started....

    "It all goes back to when I was a child in Druselstein. My parents couldn't afford a magic marker and index cards, so they tried to get the school board to subsidize a GPS-based Child Locator System. And all the other kids laughed and laughed and laughed .... so now I have made my SchoolBoardAnalRapeInator to get my revenge on those idiotic school boards once and for all! Muahahahaha!!!"

  141. Odds about 2 in a million per year by davidwr · · Score: 1

    It takes less than a few minutes for some deranged pedophile to snatch, rape, and kill a kid. FAR faster than any amount of technology can react.

    Not counting deranged uncles and deranged neighbors, how often does this happen? Maybe 500 times a year in America, a country of 300 million people.

    In short, your kid is much more likely to be killed in an auto accident than murdered.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  142. Other Options... by LabRat007 · · Score: 1

    Consider private education. Seriously.

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
  143. no, but you sure do blow... by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    I have 4 kids age 5 through 15. We've had kids missing for a bit (usually the oldest), but always found them safe and sound. No worries over here.

    I grew up in Saginaw, MI and lived as a teenager in Detroit. Out of all of my friends and family, only ONE person has ever had anything happen to them as a kid and they're alive and still doing quite well. Saginaw is a hell hole, the only place in the country scarier is Oakland, CA, yet I have very young cousins that walk the street without incident on a regular basis.

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
  144. Authority problems by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Hi Blowhard66,

    What happens when your kid says "I'm on the wrong bus" and the driver/proctor/whatever says "no you're not, sit there."

    In 99.99% of the cases, the child will sit there on the wrong bus.

    You have a grasp of childhood cognition that isn't so great.

    1. Re:Authority problems by Knara · · Score: 1

      Most bus drivers are good, helpful people.

      Shocking anecdotes do not routine behavior make, and the last thing the overwhelming number of bus drivers wants is a little kid left over at the end of the route who didn't get off at one of the stops.

  145. an alternative solution by bitt3n · · Score: 1

    I operate a business that may be able to help you: we're a group of seedy-looking middle-aged men who drive around in unmarked, windowless vans, following small children and offering them candy. For five dollars a month, you can call our dispatcher at any time to know where your child is, and whether he presently prefers sweet tarts or jawbreakers.

  146. Kajeet does a lot of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also allows you to restrict who can call the phone and who the phone can call.
    http://www.kajeet.com/

  147. And here I was thinking by wurp · · Score: 2, Funny

    And here I was thinking his sig made a great combination with his last sentence!

  148. I also planned a tracking system, and... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    ...as I am very very strict in my security, I would never go without the following:

    • Everything is encrypted. Encrypt the location data as soon as possible. If you do not need to show it on the mobile device, encrypt it right after reading it from the GPS API. With the public key of the analyzing client. Then send it out with your ID and metadata, in another encryption container, that is secured with the public key of the server On the server, never ever decrypt the location data. But encrypt the connection to the analyzing client again, with its public key. Then encrypt the private key for the client with a password. And put it on a usb stick So only the person with that stick and the password can get the data.
    • Next, add a opt-in-based trust-relationship aspect into that prototype. Let the tracked device have a way to define what user or group can see what part of your location, id and metadata, and to what detail (eg. gps resolution). Then let the server check the analyzers rights on every request, and filter the data accordingly. (If possible, prefer doing as much filtering as possible on the tracked device, or as early on as possible. Just as with the encryption. The user has to specifically allow something, just as with firewalls. (By the way: If there is a generic well-proven library that does implement all this in a generic way: Use it!)
    • Final rule: In this issue, there is no such thing as security overkill. Don't be lazy.

    Oh, and if you track your children without their approval or even knowledge, then you are a bad parent and a weirdo/stalker. Good parents have the trust of their children, and do not have to rely on such evil tactics. Additionally, using them makes your children trust you even less, and learn a bad lesson too. It's a slippery slope that you do not want to try out.
    I think we all are perfectly capable to do it the good way. You are no exception. Use your skills! :)

    (I made this post generic, so it's more useful.)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  149. Wrong, not over, reaction by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    He is not over reacting but he is reacting wrongly. The problem here is that the local school are incompetent not that you need to track your kid. How hard is it to have lists of pupil's names associated with each bus and given to the bus driver to check off? In fact if they are really this incompetent do you really want to send your kid to that school? What is she going to learn? Since the school seems resigned to the problem take it up with the board of governors (or whomever is in charge of the school). If they will not fix the problem then publicise the issue to the other parents (chances are from your description though they are already aware of it) and then organize a few "fun" events like have everyone boycott the buses for one day and drive their kids to and from school (imagine the traffic headache that will cause as well as potentially give the bus drivers concerns of job security). Things like that should help address the root cause of the problem without having to resort to more Orwellian methods. The other advantage is that you'll also have improved things for everyone else at the same time.

  150. Hmm Public School? by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Odd I went to private grade school and my bus driver knew every kids name on the bus. Never once did I ever here of a kids getting misplaced. Hell I even fell asleep on the bus once and the bus driver woke me up knowing I had got on the bus but hadn't got off the bus.

    Sounds like a public school problem to me...

    I heard the goverment is going to be making cars now. I wonder if they'll do the same quality job they did with public education....

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:Hmm Public School? by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1

      I had some lady knock on our door last fall looking for her son. Apparently someone put him on the wrong bus and he got off in our neighborhood (no where near where he lived). He was going to a private Catholic school about 5 miles from our house.

      --

      ÕÕ

  151. Overprotection vs. Independence by krinderlin · · Score: 1

    Stranger danger is vastly overrated. Bad things happen, yes. However, raising and indoctrinating our children with an attitude of fear and "playing it safe" spills over from walking home from school to applying to a highly competitive university.

    The things you teach now will be applied to every facet of her life. Rather than to teach her to be afraid, you should teach her to balance risk with reward, to keep a cool head in unexpected situations, and to feel confident in herself because you trust her to do the right thing.

    Actions like this perpetuate a sense that she is always incompetent until proven otherwise. You should teach her that she should know her own boundaries and trust her to be capable until she displays otherwise.

    My own parents took this approach. Though, I will say that it did backfire a little. I was independent and living on my own at 17 as an emancipated minor. They were really against it at the time, but they trusted me to make that decision. I fell on my face a lot, but here I am, 25, done with my first bachelor's, excellent prospects for going directly into my Ph.D., and financially independent. I'm one of the most stubborn, self-motivated person I know. Most of the other people I know from my circle are in the 21-25 range, live with their parents, and can't even cobble together two jobs and move out. Not to mention I can easily bully them into doing about whatever I want them to do.

    In summary: Raising a successful, independent child who thinks for herself is nerve racking and likely to result in a child that will do what they want how they want to do it. On the other hand, they'll never lie down and let someone else walk all over them, and you'll be able to brag to everyone that your kid's an astronaut/professor at MIT/etc. :-)

  152. MisterHouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MisterHouse already does this and it's written in perl.

  153. Having this done in Linux? What? by jr76 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, this is a highly profitable sector, something where not having the nuts and bolts open to the world is in your self-interest and something that requires a substantially mature and solid niche technology, of which Linux is the worst thing in the world for. The best developers will be making money off of this, having it not on Linux; People like you should be wanting this to be kept as a more 'private' technology; and while Linux can be rock-solid in highly mainstream products, is not remotely close to it in niche technologies due to the nature of open-source, which requires a huge base with recurring interest, so that enough people have enough free time to burn to make it be stable and secure.

    Keep on dreaming...

  154. Go Low-Tech by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    Here is what my wife and I use:
    http://www.petsmart.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2751438

    When they get a little older we'll go high-tech:
    http://www.petsmart.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2753828

  155. Roll your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At java one I ran across this, http://developer.sprint.com/devplayzone , which is an open use, web service front-end to network level calls on Sprint's network. I.E. from this you can call the location service from a simple html page that feeds its data into google maps. Its a little limited, i.e. you can only call the service once every five minutes for an actual update of location, it only accurate up to 100 meters, and you can only call it 250 times per day. To keep you from freaking out about teh big br0th3r you actually have to agree to being tracked by the service for that user, and you can remove your access from your account, its still pretty rough, but what do you expect for nothing ;) Granted you have to give your daughter a sprint phone.

  156. A phone? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    When I was in grade three (in 1975) I started taking public transit (by bus) to school. This included a transfer between buses. In addition to my bus fare, my parents gave me a dime to call home if I got lost or had a problem. I never did. Just get your kid a phone. If you've lost the kid, call them and say "Where are you?" or have them call you.

  157. put filesharing on her iPhone by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 1

    setup Britney Spears mp3s sharing. Then the RIAA & your two-faced service provider can locate her for you!

  158. When did this happen? by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

    ... it took less than three days for my local school district to misplace my daughter, I have decided that something needs to be done.

    Your daughter's school starts in May? Where do you live, Thailand?

    1. Re:When did this happen? by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      No, it's a one month introduction to kindergarten before kindergarten starts in August.

    2. Re:When did this happen? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Since when does kindergarten need an introductory period the year before?

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    3. Re:When did this happen? by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Since when has July and August been made into a whole year? It's something optional the school offered, and most of her daycare friends are taking it, so I let her do it too.

    4. Re:When did this happen? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the school year, which tends to begin in the fall in my area. Sheesh!

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  159. Low-tech vs. High-tech. by geekmux · · Score: 0, Troll

    When I was in kindergarden, they went with the low-tech system. Every kid had a name tag that they had to wear all day. It had their name, grade, teacher, and bus number. Teachers aids were by the buses and would verify the bus number on the tag matched the bus. If they kid got on the wrong bus, they were turned away and walked to the right one.

    How much does it cost for a 3x5 index card and a safety pin? A whole lot less than an electronic tracking system, and recurring cell bills for your kid.

    Hrm, let's analyze that for a minute. High-tech solution embedded in a cell phone or similar device at $20 - $30/month vs. the $200-shrink bill you'll be getting every week for mutilating her social worth and standing by wearing a 3x5 index card until she's 18 years old...

    I believe "unobtrusive" was one of the first requirements, rightfully and respectfully so. After all, your kids will be taking it about as well as you being tagged and tracked by your boss, so whatever "it" is for a solution should be rather stealth.

    1. Re:Low-tech vs. High-tech. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          At the school, that only lasted for a couple weeks. It was time for the kids to get familiar with the bus, driver and kids. if the driver knew he brought a kid in the morning, he'd wait until that kid came out in the afternoon, or they'd confirm that he went home with his/her parents. I do remember the occasional incident, where every bus was held from departing because a kid snuck onto the wrong bus. The ones that I knew the circumstances, the kid wanted to go play at a friends house, and the school hadn't been told this was authorized. That always ended up being a good thing, because the parents didn't know either. Our school zone was huge, it was possible to end up 30 miles from where you belonged if you managed to do it. They've since built new schools, and subdivided it drastically.

          The bus drivers got to know the kids that are suppose to be on his bus and where they get off. Sometimes a kid wouldn't be paying attention, and failed to get off, and he'd yell back "Billy, this is your stop!"

          I moved to this school district and rode school buses for the first time in 1979, when I was 5 years old. To this day, I remember it was bus 58-79, the driver was Mr. Lightburn, and it was 3rd from last in the line. It wasn't until middle school that I knew what the CNG sticker was on the side of it was, and it wasn't until high school that the real understanding of what that really meant. As it turned out, it was the only one in the fleet, and they were testing to see if it was economical and could last. I just did a quick search, and couldn't find any reference to CNG buses in that area, so I'm guessing they're all diesel now.

          If the kid can't remember what bus (s)he rides, and gets on a bus with a completely strange rider and kids after a sufficient training period (2 weeks was always more than sufficient), that kid will probably end up needing to ride on the short bus, and be walked from the special classes to the bus anyways.

          There are things that kids are suppose to be taught anyways, like your home address and phone number(s). My parents did it right, I never got lost, but I still remember our home address where I lived from when I was born to 5 years old. They did a good job, if I can remember that little piece of trivia from being a child, 30 years later. Not that I'd ever need it, but I still know the old home phone number too.

          I guess this happens more often than we'd like to know, and when they grow up, they're the people that get drunk, break into a neighbors house to go to sleep, because they forgot which house was theirs. Badly trained kids become badly trained adults.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  160. Think of the Children! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Seriously people, not one Michel Jackson joke yet? You guys are slipping.

    I just thought of like 5 Michel Jackson jokes and I am not even trying. For shame slashdot, for shame.

  161. Definitely manage expectations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... And try to resist the clarion call of fear, Fear, FEAR that causes many otherwise adjusted parents to think their child is on the cusp of being abducted. Constantly. Life is risk and, sadly enough sometimes kids are endangered. Statistically speaking, however, most citizens are good people and most kids are in more danger from "Uncle Ronald" than they are strangers.

  162. Wow by polymerousgeek · · Score: 1

    Totally read this as "Chili Locating System"

    I'd buy it.

    --
    53 49 47 53 20 53 55 43 4B
  163. Helicopter parents by JustJenFelice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There comes a time in everybody's life where we have to recognize that we cannot (nor should we) control every aspect of our child's life. Every time a child leaves the care of his/her parent, both are presented with opportunity. The child receives an opportunity to navigate a situation independently, learning to evaluate and rely upon their own abilities. The parent receives an opportunity to begin that process of "letting go", in addition to developing faith in the child's ability to care for himself/herself.

    While I agree that it is painfully horrifying to confront the "what could happen" scenarios, subjecting a child to a constant police state environment will cause numerous forms of blow-back, both for the child and the parent.

    --
    [Insert pithy line of moxie here.]
  164. home school by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 1

    Why does a 4 year old need to go to an institution anyway? Soon they'll want 3 year olds. If they can't keep all their ducks in order for busing, what other errors are going to be overlooked?

  165. Hey, this is Slashdot by BlackSabbath · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your post shows elements of learning and apologising. This just won't do.

  166. GTA 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GTA 4 made fun of you you now

  167. Relatively cheap solution by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

    First of all, I don't advocate tracking of people against their will, no matter what their age. My solution is not only cheap, but exceeding difficult to use without the child being aware of it, so I don't mind sharing it:

    option 1:
    http://www.instamapper.com/diy.html

    option 2:
    http://www.slashgear.com/open-gps-tracker-based-on-cheap-prepaid-phone-0340035/ (more work, but potentially cheaper)

    Just stash it in their backpack.

  168. Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh...

    Since when do we use technology to replace personal responsiblity?

  169. busses and education by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    When I was in middle school they gave all the kids a laminated bus pass

    When I was in middle school, we were hacking the busses ourselves in a way. Neighborhoods would be served sometimes by multiple busses, such that walking 2 blocks further than your "scheduled" stop would put you on a bus that might be a shorter route, have fewer kids, or have that person who you just really want to sit by. But middle school kids should, at the least, know their own neighborhoods well enough to know if they are on the right bus to go home or not.

    the bus numbers spray painted on the sidewalk so everyone who had to ride the bus knew exactly where to line up. Nobody ever got on the wrong bus because nobody ever got in the wrong line

    That works well for kids who know how to read. However a lot of schools now don't really have "literate" children until 2nd grade. This is something that changed appallingly fast, too. When I went to grade school, I could read and write before I started kindergarten. When my oldest younger siblings went to school, they couldn't read and write until they were at least in 2nd grade - and we went through the same school system.

    Hence even if the numbers are sprayed on the sidewalk, those numbers won't do you any good if the kids can't read them.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  170. Wristwatch solutions by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    While a cell-phone solution might work for a teen, I don't think that's going to get held on to by a kindergarten aged kid.

    There are a number of wristwatch solutions out there. One that I saw (but couldn't locate quickly) made it so that you could not remove the watch w/o the right pin - the idea being that if the child was kidnapped you would not want the watch removed easily.

    Here is one solution that I found: lok8u.com

    Ah, here is another, which requires a remote device to unlock the wristwatch: www.brickhousesecurity.com/wf200.html

    1. Re:Wristwatch solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when the rapists/abductors take your kid, you actually want them to his hand off?

  171. Calm down by jstrazzere · · Score: 1

    "What other recommendations do you have?" I recommend you sit down, perhaps have a nice glass of wine, and think this through for a moment. It's not that big of a deal. Your child is fine, right? Don't you think you are going just a little bit overboard here?

  172. AmberAlertGPS by supremecommander62 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The company I work for is contracting to build a LAMP based customer management system for this new cool device. Clearly the smallest thing out there. Go check it out at www.amberalertgps.com. They have spent alot of time trying to figure out pricing, options, features, and I think they have good solution. Cheap on the low end, feature rich on the high end. The features real quick are, Safe-Zone, Destination Alert, Speed Alert, Temperature Alert, Monitor, Page, Current Location, and SOS. All the commands are executable from your cell phone, just send an SMS to the device and it do what you tell it to. Simplest feature is 'where', and a few seconds later the device sends back a link to a web page with the google map location of where the device is.

  173. GPS Cell Phone & Google Maps by gillkm · · Score: 1

    A while back when I had a blackberry I wrote a simple background app that went and updated the GPS every few minutes and made a HTTP request to my webserver with the coordinates. On the server, I made another page that simply overlaid the points on Google Maps. At the time I used it primarily to track where I was walking my dog (mainly to satisfy curiosity when I want to know where or how far we went). My wife actually pulled it up once while I was out on a walk when she wanted to come get us for something so she didn't have to go driving around searching for us (or so she says :) ).

    It was a really simple set up (I think i had it working in an hour or so), and i'm sure you could put something together for a smaller phone if you don't want to get a berry for your daughter. I don't have the code anymore, otherwise I'd post a link... I'll look around for it, probably on a thumbdrive somewhere)

    --
    I don't like sigs... I don't use it...
  174. It's not just what you ask for yourself by btempleton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're upset that your daughter was lost, and everybody understands that. But you must consider what it means to have what you ask for become a trend, and to have the infrastructure built to make it easy to do.

    Perhaps when your child is 6 nobody will claim she has any rights, and you are free to lojack her. But then we will have to ask the question, when does she gain some dignity and rights, at what age does it become a bad idea for you to do this? At what age should it actually be illegal for you to do this? We have not had to ask that question until you do it.

    Location services all beg the question of what to do when one person is in power over another and can demand location data. You can over your young child, and more debatably over your older child. Can employers ask it of employees? On their breaks? Can husbands ask it of wives? Not demand it, you understand, but ask, as in, "Honey, what's wrong with me knowing where you are? Think how handy it would be. Don't you trust me? Don't you love me?"

    This is the world you will help build. But it gets worse. You see, there will be flaws in the system. Not just hackable security issues, but mistakes. After a custody battle, somebody will forget to turn off the non-custodial parent's access to the location data on the child. This will assist in many kidnappings. (As you may not know, the vast, vast, vast majority of kidnappings are by relatives. The random stranger that everybody is afraid of barely exists.) Perhaps not in your case, but in many people's in this world you are creating.

    A better idea? Teach your child, if lost, to approach a suitable adult, and hand them a card or show them her bracelet, which has your cell phone numbers on it. We tell children not to talk to strangers, but we forget to mention that means not to talk to strangers who approach *you*. It is perfectly fine to talk to strangers the child selects for help, more than fine, it's the right thing for her to do. Or sew the number in the lining of her coat, or shoes, or lunchbox or whatever. If you really think it's bad for her to approach strangers, teach her to identify police, teachers, people in uniform etc, but tell her that if she can't find one of those to approach any nicely dressed person.

    She'll be fine.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:It's not just what you ask for yourself by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Paranoid much?

      The guy just wants to use technology to turn a terrifying situation into a slightly less terrifying one for his family. He's not trying to impose his authoritarian, unbending will on a helpless populace. I don't see any dangerous "worlds" being created by one parent's desire to safeguard his child. He's not asking the government to do it, for one, and there's no evidence that this "trend" would continue into the girl's adolescence or adulthood.

      Relax. Not everyone is "out to get you," and just remember that 1984 was speculative fiction ("what if?"), not prediction or prophecy.

    2. Re:It's not just what you ask for yourself by shentino · · Score: 1

      Simple

      As a parent you own your kid and can do whatever you damn please except cause injury or neglect.

      No property rights, no privileges, no nothing. You can strip them down sell their stuff and yank them off to hawaii and the government shouldn't intervene.

    3. Re:It's not just what you ask for yourself by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      While 1984 was written as speculative fiction, some of our friends in the UK seem to be using it as an instruction manual.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    4. Re:It's not just what you ask for yourself by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's always 3 groups who get the invasive technology before all others: prisoners, children, and the military. They all have fewer rights than anyone else in society. In all 3 cases, we say it is for their own good; prisoners so they stay where they are, children so they don't wander off, and soldiers so that you can see them on the blue force tracker.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:It's not just what you ask for yourself by btempleton · · Score: 1

      Children are human beings. They do have rights. They have fewer rights. As they get older, they gain more. It isn't just a binary thing when they become 18 or 21. This is not about the government taking away from the rights of the parent. It's about the government protecting the rights of the child. There is a balance.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  175. Re:Solve it for everyone by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    Yes, solve the problem for everyone's child at the same time. Ask them what their current system is, and how they intend to fix it. Bring several of these suggestions to the table, including the low-tech ones, and let them know that it is not acceptable to lose children.

    You can fix your problem, but in 5 years when your kid is safe and someone else's kid gets raped and murdered, won't you feel bad for solving it for yourself?

  176. Making a child locator.... by Nichole_knc · · Score: 1

    Retractable leaches comes to mind....

    1. Re:Making a child locator.... by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      I do hope you meant "leashes" and not "leaches".

  177. Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered talking to your local marine biologist? I'm sure they have already come up with something to track whales, birds, and other migratory species.

    All jokes aside. Your phone company has thought of this. There are phones made for kids with GPS, and services for said phone that allow you to track the device.

    Also, they can call you and you can call them. A virtual leash, which is a hell of a lot cooler than tagging an ankle.

  178. cell phone ? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    Just give her a cell phone ? So that she can call for help ?

    I must confess, when I read "Child Locating System" I thought that this would surely help pedophiles more than parents. I mean, a lost chil emitting a beacon, what more could they ask for ?

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  179. High tech not needed....K.I.S.S. by rts008 · · Score: 1

    If she's old enough to ride a bus, she's old enough to remember a cell phone number...

    If she can remember a cell phone number, why not have her memorize her bus number so none of this becomes an issue in the first place?

    Treat the disease, not the symptoms!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  180. BUG by slashdevnull · · Score: 1

    Check out the BUG open source hardware/software platform. It would let you do something like this.
    http://buglabs.net/

  181. Why not just give her a cell phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't Cell phones these days offer GPS capabilities and the option to let "friends" track them?

    Make it a nifty phone loaded with the kind of games that children love and adults loathe, and you can rest assured that between the texting to friends and the accessorizing/customization of the phone, it will *never* leave her side. She'll probably think you're the coolest parent on Earth. Besides being able to call you in case of emergency, and you being able to potentially call her in case that she's out later than expected... and if you really get worried, I DO believe that some services make it possible to display the phone's location on an internet map.

  182. Not to put too fine a point on it... by rgviza · · Score: 1

    ... but if your kid is really in danger from a dangerous person, the perp will probably search them for such a device and throw it in a trash can. If she isn't in danger, then what's the point? Slightly faster to find her? That's a pretty small advantage to gain for the price you'll pay for going Big Brother on her.

    In this case she simply got on the wrong bus. Attaching a tracking device to a child will just lead to a broken or lost tracking device and when you really need it it probably won't be working, the battery will be dead, etc.

    I think the real problem is trusting a young child to know which bus to get on and where to get off, then again, I am not in your shoes. There's no way in hell I'd let a kid younger than 10 ride a school bus, but that's just me. I drop mine off and pick them up after work. When he hits 10 he'll get a "how to ride the school bus" class along with all the warnings, cautions, and test runs that I deem necessary to feel confident he knows which bus to get on, where his stop is and how to deal with strangers with candy.

    I look at it the same way I do leaving them home. In my state it's legal to allow your kid to be by themselves in your house after age 8. Other people do it. He knows how to dial 911. He knows my cell number. He knows what to do in the event of fire (grab phone, run outside, dial 911, then call me). He knows not to drink the stuff under the sink. Am I going to go to the gym for an hour and leave him there alone? HELL NO!!! I live in the city. About all I do is unload the car, and let him fire up the xbox while I park. If it's longer than 5 minutes, he's coming with me. I trust him completely, I just don't trust the rest of the world.

    At the end of the day you have to make a decision about convenience vs. safety and do whatever you feel is right. Attaching a device to your child isn't going to solve your safety issues or guarantee anything. Being in control of your child's transportation arrangements will solve this particular risk.

    -Viz

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  183. Happened to me! by rotide · · Score: 1
    Nearly the exact same thing happened to me.

    I was quite little, maybe in 1st or 2nd grade.

    My mother was a single mom with a single child and I had to go to a babysitters after school. Instead of going home, I'd be dropped off at my sitters.

    I believe it was my first day at the new sitters. The sitter had a young child nearly my age at the time who attended the same school. The sitter asked him to make sure I got on the correct bus. Well, it didn't work that way.

    The school put me on the wrong bus.

    No one knew there was an issue, until the bus arrived at the sitters and the sitters son was crying saying he never saw me and thus I wasn't stepping off the bus with him.

    On my side, I don't think I knew anything was wrong until I was the last kid on the bus and the driver asked me where I was supposed to be going. Again, it was a new sitters and I'm sure I replied that I wasn't sure. I had SOME idea, however. I know this because I was trying to instruct the bus driver as to where to go. Interestingly enough, my family later moved to the same area and became familiar with it. The route I was asking the driver to go wasn't too far off, only a couple streets away. Regardless, it wasn't me who got me "home".

    I don't know the details on the other side too well. But my mother had gotten word that I didn't get off the bus and called the school. The school put her in touch with the dispatcher for the busses and they got in contact with my driver (whom I believe was in contact with them, but there wasn't a link between me and my mother yet).

    She simply told them where to go and the driver got me there. A little fuss and I'm sure I was scared, but a simple phone call from those who knew where I was supposed to be and I was there shortly after.

    GPS, cell phones, computers as we know them, the internet as we know it, etc, etc, etc, didn't exist. Yet I got home safe that day.

    Sometimes you CAN trust the system to work. Just be informed as to when and where your child was supposed to be and you can pick up the trail quickly. Even if my mother wasn't going to find out about the incident for a while and I was stranded longer, I have no doubt the school would have looked up records and figure it all out on their own. At least they would have explored contacting the "contacts" list in my file, etc.

    If it was a malicious attempt to abduct me, I don't even think a cell/tracker would have helped. Pretty sure someone will confiscate that quickly.

  184. Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your child has a cell phone to call you in case of emergencies, then you can track it. At&t has family Map, which costs $10 a month and can track two numbers.
    https://familymap.wireless.att.com/finder-att-family/howWorks.htm

  185. Smartphone by ponraul · · Score: 1

    If money isn't a concern, get a G1 and enable Google Latitude. Underclock it to 128MHz to save battery life.

  186. My needle works, how about your compass? by postermmxvicom · · Score: 1

    You're right.

    Why waste those few precious moments with your children when ultimately it won't mean anything to either of you and your investment is wasted. It is much more likely that your posterity will live to see the world ravaged by depleted resources and pollution.

    Besides, I *loved* riding the bus for the few years I did. It was *totally* worth waking up early for. In fact, it is why I woke up, I didn't even need an alarm. I still remember my bus driver's name and all the life lessons she taught me. Plus I forged a deep and invaluable relationship with all the people on the bus. Each of whom I contact daily even now. Unlike my resource greedy parents who did not respect Earth enough to give up their selfish desire to spend time with me.

    I tried sarcasm to reach you. If it worked, your kids might thank me.

    --
    One last thing: Sometimes I wonder; "Is that someone's signature? Or do they type that at the end of each post?"
  187. ZigBee my friend - 900Mhz ISM band! by bjamesv · · Score: 1

    I like the solution of a linux machine with GPS and a GSM modem, mostly because of the added ~telephone~ functionality. but that's hardly cool at all, so then i thought - ham radio maybe? any mobile packet radio gear that weighs less then 10kg?

    but that requires a license to broadcast on.

    What your kid really needs is a little board to speak your custom, encrypted, location protocol over the 900Mhz ISM band! i hear you can get 40mi range for 400usd ;P

  188. So what do you tell these parents? by misterooga · · Score: 1

    It's interesting because I was talking to my wife about this concept. For all of you telling the OP that s/he is over-reacting, what do you tell parents of Tori Stafford [google.ca]?

    1. Re:So what do you tell these parents? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      I'd tell them that I sympathize deeply, but that they are an extremely rare anomaly and that the societal impact of tracking our children's every move may be orders of magnitude more harmful than the very occasional child abduction. I'd then have them watch the Penn & Teller episode on Stranger Danger. I'd also point out that they were personally acquainted with one of the suspects.

      Bad things happen. You can't prevent all of them, and I think it is a mistake to try to change how 300 million people live in a very likely negative manner to try to prevent the very few rare cases from occurring.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  189. reply to self by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    Ok, I should have looked this up first, http://www.tpl.org/tier3_cd.cfm?content_item_id=22900&folder_id=630 claims to be the Nation's Largest Elementary School with 1974 student. Not quite thousands and not exactly typical. Rarely in any other place than NY would you see a population density where that could even happen yet you speak of it as a common place occurance.

    Actually, according to http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05/tables/dt05_096.asp, there are 65k elementary schools in the US and the average student population is 476. Florida has the largest average size at 737 and that is still well below your "thousands" statement. Even then there are only 15 states that have average sizes over 500 and 21 have less than 400 students on average.

  190. chip implant option? by footitch · · Score: 1

    I've thought a lot abotu this myself. Those of you who feel that this is an 'over protective parent' have not had a child abducted. I have nto either but I can only imagine the torture that a parent must feel when such a horrible thing happens. Unfortunately it happes all too often. If I had the opportunity to simply login to a site to find my child (if ever such a horrible thing happend), I'd be oh so grateful to be able to find him/her in a rapid time. Let's assume that the child's clothing and possessions are not with them at the time of abduction. If we can put a chip into a pet, why not into a child? Once the child is 18, they can remove/turn it off if they so choose. I know i am not the only person who feels this way.

    1. Re:chip implant option? by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      Completely different technology. Contrary to popular belief, RFID is not an option except if they are trying to identify the child's body after an abduction.

      Human tissue absorbs the GPS signals and having a transmitter in the body with sufficient power to reach a cell tower is not in anyone's best interest.

  191. Free Open API for LBS for smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out Xtify [http://www.xtify.com], it's a free LBS API for smart phones. It allows you to call a simple rest based web service which will return the lat/lon amongst other things of the device. It works based on cell tower, gps and wifi to gather location.

    There is a sample implementation of it at http://seemywhere.com/marcy .

  192. DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a DIY solution since every other comment I've read said to buy a cellphone. There's also a link on that page to another project that did gps tracking and worked in the middle of nowhere using shortwave radio.

  193. "where are you?" by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Therefore, I would like input on a way to be able to keep track of my child.

    Give her a phone. When you want to know where she is, call her and say, "This is dad. Where are you?"

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  194. congratulations. you're a fear-addled fool by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    some people believe if we allow gays to marry, we also have to accept pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia, polygamy...

    or howabout: if we try to control assault weapons in the usa, the government is inevitably going to take away all guns in the usa

    or: if we teach evolution in schools, soon everyone will be a godless atheist

    no: all of this is retarded hysteria. but some people actually believe this. because they are letting their irrational fears overpower their logical thought

    as you are:

    you believe if we accept child tracking by gps, we're on an unstoppable slippery slope into a black hole of everyone being tracked by gps

    uh... how about no? how about you are irrational and fear addled?

    there is no such thing as slippery slope. your fears are unfounded. why? because people understand the concepts and can think about the differences between children and others. you don't hold a monopoly on that ability

    really

    please lose your irrational fears and develop the ability for coherent logical thought. the idea of the slippery slope is a tool for propaganda, nothing more

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:congratulations. you're a fear-addled fool by RingDev · · Score: 1

      some people believe if we allow gays to marry, we also have to accept pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia, polygamy...

      Not I. My bone to pick is that right now Men and Women have different rights in the US. Not gays. All men have one set of rights. All women have another set of rights. Therefore, if we correct the differences in rights, any one subject to the US/States constitutions can have a legally binding marriage with any other person subject to the US/States constitutions.

      Pedophilia is explicitly illegal, and that legality is applied equally regardless of gender.
      Beastiality is explicitly illegal (in most states), and that legality is applied equally regardless of gender.
      etc...
      etc...
      etc...

      Either men and women are equal under the eyes of the law, or they are not. Currently, they are not.

      or howabout: if we try to control assault weapons in the usa, the government is inevitably going to take away all guns in the usa

      Again, not I. It's a moot point now. Regardless of what firearms I may or may not possess, the State and Federal government control such a superior force, that the 2nd amendment is largely worthless at this point.

      or: if we teach evolution in schools, soon everyone will be a godless atheist

      Yet again, not I. I'm already and agnostic married to an atheist. And I fully intend on educating my son on as many religious studies as he is interested in learning about. Religion is an intensely personal decision, and as such almost all schools and the vast majority of churches utterly lack the ability to truly connect a person to a spiritual truth. So why teach something the wrong way in public schools?

      you believe if we accept child tracking by gps, we're on an unstoppable slippery slope into a black hole of everyone being tracked by gps

      You sure like making assumptions about what I'm thinking, but yet again, you are wrong.

      I said that such ideas can lead to social acceptance and generational gaps. Life styles change from generation to generation. Some of that is due to technology, and some of it is due to social norms. This tidbit introduces both of those forces of social change to bear together.

      Will it be a slippery slope? Maybe. Will someone manage to get a law passed resulting in large sums of money trading hands based on this technology? Probably. Will the Supreme Court and election seasons keep the abuse of this technology largely in check? Hopefully.

      Is it something I am going to lose sleep over tonight? Not in the least. It is something though, that I will keep an eye on from a legislative point of view and would likely write my senator about if any bills start showing up dealing with additional monitoring.

      There is a huge difference between speculating about the future, being mindful of the risks, and taking appropriate action in response, and fear mongering.

      For example, if I had said:

      On September 11th we learned just how important it is to be free of these types of tracking devices. These vile devices empowered the terrorists to target innocent people. And the price of 9/11 was too high for us to bear again. We must prevent these terrorist devices from destroying our civil liberties at all costs. If we let the 9/11 like attacks on or freedoms to persist, they will absolutely bring about another bubble and bust on Wall Street. Crushing Main street just like someone crashed a plane into it. Only an America hater would buy one of these!

      Now THAT would be fear mongering. Or a Dick Cheney speech. One or the other. /shrug

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:congratulations. you're a fear-addled fool by EllisDees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >uh... how about no? how about you are irrational and fear addled?

      The irrational and fear addled response to your child getting on the wrong bus is to think that GPS tracking has to get involved instead of a little common sense parenting.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    3. Re:congratulations. you're a fear-addled fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      if we try to control assault weapons in the usa, the government is inevitably going to take away all guns in the usa

      The actual argument of gun nuts (like myself) is that those trying to ban all guns in the USA are going after "assault weapons"* now because they're perceived to be politically vulnerable. The stated goal of Brady and many other anti-gun groups is to completely disarm any law-abiding individual who isn't specifically authorized to carry. I.e. only police, military, and criminals will have guns.

      * whatever this politically-defined term means in your jurisdiction.

      Some simple facts:

      1. Semiautomatic rifles are used in almost no crimes.
      2. Military-looking semiautomatic rifles tend to shoot lower-power cartridges than other semi-auto rifles.
      3. Military-looking semiautomatic rifles are a popular target of gun bans.
      4. Small caliber revolvers are the most popular guns for use in crimes.
      5. Small caliber revolvers are very rarely targets of gun bans.

      From which I infer that the purpose of banning assault weapons has nothing to do with crime prevention or safety but is entirely a first, easiest step in an effort to change legal/cultural norms with the ultimate goal of banning all guns.

  195. Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, kids always come back when they are hungry.

  196. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monkeysphere

  197. This is not a technical problem by djlowe · · Score: 1
    You are looking for a technical solution to a non-technical problem.

    However, since it took less than three days for my local school district to misplace my daughter, I have decided that something needs to be done.

    I agree with you, something *should* be done: You should call the school, and ask for an appointment with the principal and express your concerns to him or her in person, and ask what they are doing to ensure that it doesn't happen again. If you aren't satisfied with the response, take the matter up with the Superintendent and finally, if necessary, the School Board.

    By the school district's own admission it is a recurring problem of placing children on the wrong buses

    Which is why it's all the more important to address the source of the problem. Your proposed solution works only for your daughter, and then only when she becomes lost. A much more desirable outcome is that this not happen at all, and fixing the cause of the problem resolves the situation not only for you and your child, but for other parents and their children as well.

    Regards,

    dj

  198. Yep: remember poor little fruit stand by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.sermonillustrations.com/a-z/n/name.htm
    "When the 1960s ended, San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury district reverted to high rent, and many hippies moved down the coast to Santa Cruz. They had children and got married, too, though in no particular sequence. But they didn't name their children Melissa or Brett. People in the mountains around Santa Cruz grew accustomed to their children playing Frisbee with little Time Warp or Spring Fever. And eventually Moonbeam, Earth, Love and Precious Promise all ended up in public school.

    That's when the kindergarten teachers first met Fruit Stand. Every fall, according to tradition, parents bravely apply name tags to their children, kiss them good-bye and send them off to school on the bus. So it was for Fruit Stand. The teachers thought the boy's name was odd, but they tried to make the best of it.

    "Would you like to play with the blocks, Fruit Stand?" they offered. And later, "Fruit Stand, how about a snack?" He accepted hesitantly. By the end of the day, his name didn't seem much odder than Heather's or Sun Ray's.

    At dismissal time, the teachers led the children out to the buses. "Fruit Stand, do you know which one is your bus?"

    He didn't answer. That wasn't strange. He hadn't answered them all day. Lots of children are shy on the first day of school. It didn't matter. The teachers had instructed the parents to write the names of their children's bus stops on the reverse side of their name tags. The teacher simply turned over the tag. There, neatly printed, was the word "Anthony.""

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  199. Could get expensive by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem I have with giving expensive gadgets to kids is that if it can be taken off and left somewhere, then it almost certainly will be. On the other hand, if you built a GPS into her chastity belt...

    My wife tried giving our daughter a cell phone in first grade, so we could know where she was and if she made it home from school ok. But my daughter got in trouble for not turning it off during school, and if she did turn it off, she couldn't remember to turn it back on.

    Unless you can come up with a device that locks on, can't be removed, is waterproof, and is close to unbreakable, it's not going to be very reliable. Also, there are plenty of places where GPS receivers simply don't work, e.g. inside most office buildings. Heck, we couldn't even get cell phones to work inside multi-story Intel or HP buildings (they are built by pouring concrete onto corrugated steel, making for a fairly effective RF shield unless you are standing in front of a window.)

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  200. You're going about it wrong. by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I see tons of comments saying it shouldn't be done because of Big Brother and it's future impact on society...

    Guys... tracking people with GPS devices is like an atomic bomb, you can't just forget it and it'll go away. Millions of people have already thought of this, it's coming. You can moan and whine all you want, in a few years they will be selling these at Walmart in a nice easy to use package.

    So instead of going "I won't make it, that's just helping Big Brother", why don't you be real geeks and do it because it CAN be done? Then being the alpha males in this area of technology you can clearly demonstrate the dangers of it simply and publicly BEFORE the tech is widespread.

    I mean seriously... now your politics is getting in the way of your geek cred, time to turn in your cards. I never heard "Don't make a potato cannon, the feds could use that tech someday". We do a lot of stuff that's dangerous and stupid, don't let your distopian fears prevent you from getting a handle on real life social issues when you can have the most positive impact.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  201. Evil Bad Schools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, my daughter was located, with no thanks to the local school district.

    Then how exactly was your daughter located, considering she was placed on the wrong school bus. Friend? Relative? Concerned neighbor? Act of the Almighty Bob? Or is this really just a dig a public schools 'cause they are so crappy and all?

    I think the district might have had SOME small part in finding her, don't you?

  202. Cellphone by selven · · Score: 1

    So if something happens to her she can phone you. Completely voluntary, so there are no ethical objections to this, and it works just fine in situations like her getting on the wrong bus.

    1. Re:Cellphone by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      There are no ethical objections to a tracking device, either. He has a right to know where his kid is. Period. His kid does not have a right to not have her parents know where she is. Period.

  203. ..obligatory by pm_rat_poison · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does it run linux?

  204. Alternate Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Wait for your daughter to on the wrong bus.
    2. Let your daughter get lost.
    3. Sue the school.
    4. Profit.

  205. www.findmespot.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works in the areas with no cellular signal.

  206. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the trouble you are going through just take your daughter out of government run schools and put her into a private school. Not only will she get a better education but she will be a valued cared for client rather than a forgotten nameless child.

  207. Open Source Solution by EW87 · · Score: 0

    I have a revolutionary idea. It's an open source solution I found. It's called "go to the school and pick up your goddamn child"

    1. Re:Open Source Solution by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's an open source solution I found. It's called "go to the school and pick up your goddamn child

      I just love seeing 900 SUVs double parked & causing tailbacks three miles from the school in both directions. I love it even more than I love smug twats like you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  208. Too much technology, not enough common sense. by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    Take her to school and pick her up afterwards yourself?

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  209. Calm down or else! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be more efficient to hire competent people in your school district that know how to put the child on the right bus.

    In a word: NO.

    Exactly - you must fix the staff the school already has, since even the most incompetent or negligent can't be fired.
    The most effective approach is a bit old-fashioned. Let it be known that Guido and Luigi might visit the next time a child is misplaced. They have a baseball bat, and are keen to give "sports lessons" to any teachers in need of training.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  210. what about the mapping side? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    So lets assume you do have your child pinpointed, what would be the best way to identify exactly where the kid is? Preferably via webpage so you could use a phone with browser...

    Im thinking some sort of web-service where you could just plug in xy coordinates?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  211. Tried AT&T FamilyMap - It doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was mostly worried about my daughter losing her cell phone. She has a tendency to missplace things. So I tried enabling ATT FamilyMap (http://familymap.attwireless.com) hoping that I would at least be able to tell if she had left the phone at home or in her locker at school. Unfortunately ATT FamilyMap is not that accurate. It unfortuantely can only locate the phone within 2 miles. It can't tell the difference between my house, our school, or my brother-in-law's house as we are all within a 2 mile diameter circle. I turned it off because it was useless.

  212. GPS Enabled phones.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't Google Latitude or Twitter using a GPS enabled phone do just that?

  213. Cheapest easiest solution by Protocron · · Score: 1

    Make magazine had this covered back a while ago:

    http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2005/10/diy_gps_tracking.html
    http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2005/10/diy_gps_tracking_with_mologogo.html

    Mologogo with a cheap $60 cell phone.

    Before your kid leaves for the day, check her bag and make sure it's on and working properly.
    When she gets home, put the cell phone on the charger.

    In the event that you loose your kid, you check the website and Mologogo will tell you where the kid is at.
    My phone can tell me where any of my friends are, yours should to.

    Easy peasy.

    --
    CAPS LOCK: ITS LIKE THE CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME
  214. APRS: Automatic Position Reporting System by atluxity · · Score: 1

    I dont agree with your logic, but I am not the right guy to pas judgement because I dont have any kids myself.

    I belive APRS is what you want, if a cell-phone is not. Although I dont know it enough to know of any devices you can place on your kid.

  215. It happened to me... by pclminion · · Score: 1

    When I was in the 7th grade or so, I got on the wrong bus home from school. Since I would read on the bus, I didn't notice that the route was wrong until I looked up 20 minutes into the drive. I don't know why, but instead of telling the driver my situation, I just got off the bus. I had NO idea where I was. I walked several blocks one way, hoping I'd see something familiar. Failing that, I turned around and walked the other way. Still unfamiliar.

    After a half hour I just walked to the nearest corner house, knocked on the door, and meekly asked to use a phone. My mom came and picked me up.

    That was before everybody had a mobile phone. If I'd had one, I would have just called mom.

    I find it hard to believe that a school-age child could not understand the concept of calling home if they get lost.

    1. Re:It happened to me... by Knara · · Score: 1

      Because every house occupant you don't know personally is highly likely to be a sexual predator. Didn't you know?

    2. Re:It happened to me... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's why I chose a CORNER house abutting a busy road. Visibility in multiple directions, with heavy traffic. Now, maybe it's overly optimistic to assume somebody would report it if they saw me being dragged into somebody's house... But it's better than nothing, and I did think about the safety of the situation at the time. I can't remember why I didn't just tell the bus driver what had happened.

  216. "Will it be a slippery slope? Maybe" by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A SLIPPERY SLOPE

    http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/slippery-slope.html

    if someone uses gps tracking devices in adults in the future, it will have absolutely nothing to with their use in children now. if you use them in children, there are no implications whatsoever as to their future use in future groups. to believe so is to think other people are unable to understand the difference between children and adults. therefore, your previous bloviating about gps tracking in children leading to gps devices in SPEEDERS for fuck sake is an example of fear-addled thinking on your part of the highest retarded order

    examine how you think about the issue. retract your statement about speeders. otherwise, your thinking is EXACTLY the thought processes of morons who think gays marrying leads to legalized necrophilia and evolution taught in our schools leads to atheism

    just admit you fucked up, and moved on, and drop the slippery slope bullshit in all future arguments, for the sake of your own lucidity

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:"Will it be a slippery slope? Maybe" by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are lots of slippery slopes that are very real. Even the link you provided clearly limits the scope of the argumentative fallacy to asserting that a small change will lead to a large change without substantiation. But to argue that a current proposal is a logical first step towards a bigger unacceptable goal is absolutely a valid argument, as long as a logical connection is made between the current proposal and the supposed larger goal.

      His argument as to why "gps tracking becomes acceptable" may some day become "gps tracking becomes normal" and why that's a problem is therefore not an example of the slippery slope fallacy. Unfortunately, this means that:

      just admit you fucked up, and moved on, and drop the slippery slope bullshit in all future arguments, for the sake of your own lucidity

      is incorrect.

      As an aside, the "slippery slope fallacy" is a specific case of Proof by assertion fallacy.

  217. I want my kids in your school! by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    Really, a school that handles children on the wrong bus regularly is MUCH better than one who doesn't have systems in place for dealing with an unpreventable (if rare) occurrence.

    I want my kid to learn what to do when things don't go right.

    Since everyone has already provided the various "child locator" links that are easily Googled, here's my high tech AND trendy alternative that will not result in a socially alienated child unit.

    Start a Twitter account for your child, like the one of the cat with half a million followers, make it SO popular people will send out "Tweets" whenever they see your child.

    Setup a search for @yourchild'sname

    You then can receive SMS messages, RSS feed, emails, whatever, whenever your child is someplace new (since people who regularly see your kid won't care enough to bother to say so).

    If you succeed well enough in this plan, your child will shortly be followed by a group of paparazzi photographing their every move! If your child is a daughter, you'll even know when she "forgets" to wear her underwear. You'll be able to share Youtube links with family and friends of your child "in action". Conveniently, anyone who makes a website about her and tries to contact her you can direct to police, therefore outing any untoward behavior.

    If you REALLY succeed well enough, the merchandising and socialite earnings will cover their college costs.

  218. CptAmerica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondering whats going on in the united states? Wouldn't it be better to teach your children to know her- himselfe which bus should be taken? In our country children know where to go an which bus is to be taken, or if the take the wrong one anyway there still is the joker to use a cellular phone and call the parents to be picked up.
    What you a trying to do is, to lock them down like a felon, they get stolen their privacy, they live in jail, nothing anybody wants to do.
    Think about it.

  219. GPS tracking children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered home schooling?

  220. A simple solution by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    What's needed is a cell phone with GPS (eg iPhone) and a button that is present during phone conversations, that when pressed causes the phone to send its current GPS coordinates to the remote party as an SMS message.

    Then you could just call your daughter and ask her to press the button, and copy the result into google maps (or whatever)

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  221. Brickhouse child locator by ZDRuX · · Score: 1

    This here little gem is $299. It's about the size of a pack of matches. Battery lasts for 5 DAYS, has a "panic" alarm that the child can press at her discretion. And also updates you through a txt message on your cellphone or email if the child leave a "designated" area that you get to control. And you can of course track the location of the GPS transmitted on in real-time on a map on the web (no software to install).

    Spark Nano Child GPS Tracker

    --
    The magical number is: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Brickhouse child locator by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      Or, purchase a Zoombak (the industry leader) for $99.99 and 3 months free service.

      http://www.zoombak.com

  222. I spent $20MM building such a system by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 1

    Back in the .com boom I started a telematics company, we had five-figures of devices on our system that we could track and control over the cellular control channel http://www.thebentleys.com/televoke/, we merged it with Telcontar, they changed their name to deCarta (www.decarta.com) who spun it out to Lunar Eye who flipped it to Celevoke where the servers are running but it's about to move to a new home. In fact, the guy (Chuck) who ran Celevoke into the ground still owes me personally ~$20k for helping him keep the system alive, but that's another story. Here's what you're up against, it's a two part problem:

    1) you need a device that knows where it is and talks to a wireless network
    2) you need a service to talk to that device and display the info on web/phone/whatever interface you want.

    Back in 1998 when I started Televoke there was only the analog cellular network and no assisted GPS (quicker GPS location times from cold start based on cell tower location information; basically allows the device to get a fix much faster because it starts out with an idea where it is). Analog cellular sucked because the standby current on the analog transceiver was too high, so, unless you were doing just a geo-fencing application (device goes outside of geographic boundary, then turn on and report the event and current location) the standby battery life of portable devices was too low and the devices were too big. We went after the automotive after-market industry instead of tracking people/pets, since cars are size/weight/power insensitive. Nowadays it's a different game. You can get tracking devices that run for a month or three on AA batteries and live on a GSM network. There are back end services out there too, the Televoke one is still running under a different name, but finding a product/service combo that will work exactly the way you want, and not cost a fortune, and be small enough to put on a kid, is hard. Some services wont transmit unless queried. Some can't take queries (no "forward channel") and only update every hour or so, or when in motion, or some other power/packet saving algorithm. I'll give you the shortcut:

    Buy your daughter a cellular phone, put it in a teddy bear or backpack or something she wont lose, charge it for her every night and track her on Google Lattitude. That will seriously be your lowest cost headache and cheapest solution when it's all said and done. As she gets older she'll WANT a cell phone and then you'll never lose her because she won't go anywhere with out. By the time she's 16 there is a 0% chance she'll keep the kiddie-finder attached to her wrist/belt/whatever.

    --
    My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
  223. Wow! by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    You must have some incredible vision to be able to watch your kids from over a mile away through buildings and trees and brick walls and everything!

  224. Stay home with them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I have to agree with the comment that this stinks a little bit. Kinda like we are being used as a market survey.

  225. Life on Earth by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 1

    My name is Sam Tyler. I was born in 1973, and my parents never fitted me with a tracking device. Were they mad, in a coma, or back in time? Whatever happened, it's like things worked out anyway. Now, maybe if I can work out the buses, I can get home.

  226. Panic response. by billcopc · · Score: 1

    This sort of extreme panic reaction to minor harmless incidents is how we wound up with things like the PATRIOT act. The kid is safe, school staff are stupid, film at 11. None of us had GPS locators when we were kids, and we turned out just fine. The world is not bursting at the seams with child predators and random faceless boogeymen.

    If anything, getting your kid accustomed to 24/7 monitoring will only make them more dependent upon it, and less apprehensive when such invasive surveillance is employed by not-so-benevolent actors. Kids have an amazing ability to adapt to their environment, give them a hard time and they grow up stronger and smarter, make it too easy and you'll wind up with Paris Hilton knockoffs. They're your kids, but they will be society's burden if you screw up.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  227. i absolutely agree by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    but if they DID put gps on a child, it does not follow that that opens the door to putting them on speeders, as the parent post implied. but thanks for the threadjack. pfffft

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  228. HomeSchool by omb · · Score: 1

    Quite apart from the problems which you face since you don't have a diversity of other kids for yours to socialize with, you do not have the depth and breadth of academic and educational experience to adequately challenge bright children.

    While I would not challenge your _RIGHT_ to HomeSchool, I would strongly question the _WISDOM_ of doing so.

    I would worry about the paucity of other children yours will meet and maybe befriend. As for teaching, you can not hope to compete with the best. Though an Athiest, at age 8, I was fortunate to be educated in a Jesuit school from 6 to 15 and I could never have gotten the breadth and depth of the 30 PhD priests who taught me. Only an Oxford Mathematics Wrangler taught me more.

    So the danger of HomeSchool is that teaching of the less driven, by the mediocre, can be less than good, except if you only want to control your child.

    Those who suggested that that you help your child to be street aware, and be prepared to look after helself have it right. She should be able to get you called or tell the Police where she lives ASAP.

    Finally, do remember as sense of proportion, and do not damage your own child as you try to protect her, you also have a duty to nurture and help her to develop to the best of her ability.

  229. you're being intellectually dishonest by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    or just ego stroking your knowledge without examining if it applies here

    read his original comment about gps tracking and children... presto chango... gps tracking in speeders

    now tell me his wording does not match the narrow qualifications you describe

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you're being intellectually dishonest by RingDev · · Score: 1

      And read my comment. I said that legislation would be passed based on social norms and fincially insensed people. We've already seen this happen time and time again. There is nothing radical about this statement.

      I also said that such legislation would hopefully be kept in check by public elections and the judicial branch. Which once again, we have seen over and over through out history. Sometimes for better, some times for worse. But it is how our system works.

      Common sense, an educated consumer and political base, and a fair and honest media industry are the bane of the "slippery slope".

      Perhaps I should have spoken more clearly. It is a slippery slope as we could easly go that route, but I am hopeful and expecting that our voting public will limit the adaptation of such norms and legislation.

      I would like to point out though, that every example I listed as part of the "slippery slope" has already been implimented, practiced, and even discussed on slash dot. Would you even flinch if you met a parolee with a GPS bracelet? What if the police put a GPS unit on your car with out a warent?

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  230. Get your kid a phone by Korin43 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if you're that worried just get your kid a cell phone. If they get lost, they can call you. I got my first cell phone at the end of Junior High, and I primarily used it for calling parents. For my parents it only cost $10/month (Verizon family plan).

  231. The Brazilian Solution by MuggieWuggy · · Score: 1
    Get her some Find Me if You Can lingerie.

    It'll make a strong statement to the school and it'll take care of the problem.

    And if they still can't get her to daddy, then maybe they can get her a new one...

  232. Using Cell ID, plus Wifi and GPS to track by some1somewhere · · Score: 1

    Well, I created a system to track my car wherever it went, not quite tracking a kid, but to some people, almost as important ;-)
    Navizon actually is a good service. You make money on it if you have GPS attached (yes, that is a referral link, but bear with me a sec), but that is besides the point... GPS doesn't work in an urban jungle, and from my experience, parking my car in a multi-storey carpark and near the edges (so the GPS is could sort of get a line-of-sight) still wasn't good enough for GPS to work constantly.

    So the way I use Navizon, is that you can set it to output its multi-tracking (GPS, then WIFI, then Cell ID, in that order, as each is less successively less accurate) service to a port on your device, and let OTHER GPS-related programs access that port, so when GPS is out-of-sight and not working, your GPS application continues to get relatively accurate positioning based on WIFI, and then failing that, triangulation based on the Cell IDs.

    They also recently added in Fireagle (the Yahoo service) so that you can update your location via Twitter and whatever else works with Fireagle. And Navizon has it's own API besides Yahoo's open API if you want to play with that. So since you wanted to write your own app to view it on a website/domain (which you can either use very simply on Navizon's own site, or if yo want to get fancy and update via Twitter or others services, Fireagle integration) then you can.

    I even though, if people put my car into a warehouse or even inside a container, at some point during it's travels, even if its sealed, it hopefully would get at least a Cell ID or Wifi position, so even without GPS it'll be functional. It won't be hugely accurate, but it'll set you in the right direction at least. And it doesn't rely on any carrier either, so it's carrier neutral too.

    Good aye?

    --
    **FREE** Track and view your phone's via CellID and/or WIFI and/or GPS :- http://tinyurl.com/la6fhd
  233. cheap easy option if you trust Google. by Ouchie · · Score: 1

    If you can get your hands on a cheap multi-media phone with gps, anything with symbian OS will work. Download the Google App package and install google maps. Then add Latitude. Google latitude lets you share your location with select friends and it can be set to refresh based on your cellphone's gps signal. For the first 3 months of this year I was commuting over 100 miles to work, each way. My wife could follow my progress on Google Maps and get a pretty good estimate of my arrival time. It isn't the most accuate but it is a free service provided you have a phone with a data package.

    --
    "Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." ~Ozzy Osborne
  234. spotless logic by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    no one has used a rocket launcher to rob a bank

    therefore, drunk rednecks should get rocket launchers

    pfffft

    oh i'm sorry if "drunk redneck" offends your cultural sensitivities

    the only truth about uncontrolled gun ownership is that rural folk benefit from them (police are far away) while urban people suffer for them (in urban settings they are the provenance of thugs)

    hundreds die every year in urban settings for the sake of a legal framework which only serves rural assholes. a MINORITY enjoy a legal status quo to the detriment of a MAJORITY. not very democratic

    it would be nice if guns could be made legal in the countryside, illegal in the cities, but of course this is impossible

    well, guess what? the usa is not an agrarian society anymore when these anachronistic laws were set. it is mostly urban already, and this will only accelerate. in places where urban dominance is well-established, like europe, guns are seen as vile, not beneficial

    so its only a matter of demographic inevitability in a democracy before the nostalgic antiquated rural gun owners are finally trumped, and guns are rounded up

    and then rural folk will suffer for the sake of urban folk, killed by illegal firearms in home invasions, with no gun of their own and the police far away. you find that injust? what of the hundreds killed in urban settings by gun toting thugs you blind selfish asshole

    instead of rural assholes holding urban folk hostage and allowing hundreds of urban folks to die every year at the hands of urban gun toting thugs, the reverse will hold true. welcome to fucking democracy, you fucking red neck

    fuck you rural twatstains. i hope you understand how your quaint nostalgia results in hundreds of urban deaths in your country. if you do understand that, congratulations on not caring, asswipe

    but don't worry about it. critical mass is not there yet. your gun will NOT be taken from you

    but it will be taken from your children

    or rather, your children will be urban, and recognize the wisdom you do not

    tick tock tick tock

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:spotless logic by rossifer · · Score: 1

      the only truth about uncontrolled gun ownership is that rural folk benefit from them (police are far away) while urban people suffer for them (in urban settings they are the provenance of thugs)

      Interesting assertion. I live in an urban area: Santa Monica, California. I think the argument for law-abiding carry of weapons for self-defense in cities is much stronger than for rural areas. In the countryside, the strongest arguments for having guns is their utility as tools. The self-defense argument is much weaker. Interestingly, in national parks and forests, the self-defense argument is more relevant as most large parks and forests harbor marijuana growers who are armed and "unfriendly".

      Of the various attacks and violent crimes in this area, strangely none of them happened while police were in sight. If you're under the apprehension that the police are there to protect you, check your assumptions and fast. The police are there to do two things: clean up afterwards and find who did it.

      If you want someone to stop a crime in progress, your cell phone isn't going to help. You're going to have to do it yourself. I offer two examples that even cover the justifiable use of high capacity magazines: Watts 1965, Rodney King 1992. In both cases, the police abandoned residents to their own devices.

      instead of rural assholes holding urban folk hostage and allowing hundreds of urban folks to die every year at the hands of urban gun toting thugs, the reverse will hold true. welcome to fucking democracy, you fucking red neck

      Hm. Someone has their panties in a serious twist.

      Sorry to disappoint your preconception of gun owners, but... I live in a condo. I live in a densely populated city near the ocean in southern California. I voted for Obama. I have two daughters in private school. I write software for Google. I drive a bicycle to work to save on gas. I go barefoot wherever I can. I buy hemp clothing and buy locally produced natural products whenever possible (lately, natural soaps). I want to buy a Chevy Volt if they ever sell it. I deplore trophy hunters, gas-guzzling trucks, drunkenness, and "buy USA" attitudes. I also happen to legally own a number of firearms and I regularly hunt for meat.

      You seem to believe that there are no benefits to legal gun ownership. And yet, by various estimates, the number of times guns are used in self-defense is between 100,000 and 2,000,000 per year (depending on who you read, between 80-99% of defensive firearm uses do not involve firing the gun, just presenting it is enough to end the attack).

      I think guns are certainly a mixed benefit, but in the end, I believe that a rational analysis will find that they are a net benefit to society. As is often quoted by the Brady group, there are about 34,000 gun deaths per year. That number includes police shootings, and justifiable homicides, which are beneficial uses. It also includes suicides, which I'm not bothered by since I'm not convinced that any of tall buildings, bridges, pills, ropes, razor blades or guns cause suicide. Most importantly, the remainder of that number after removing those categories (about 17,000/year) doesn't provide any hint of how many times someone would be killed with a knife or a club if a gun was not available, nor can that number tell us how many more violent crimes would have resulted in death if someone hadn't defended themselves.

      The number of accidental firearms deaths has been falling since WWII despite more people and more guns, is currently half the number of accidental drownings in swimming pools (~1400/year vs. ~3000/year), and 1/40th the number of accidental deaths in cars. While each accidental death is a tragedy, accidental gun deaths are not a problem in my opinion.

      in places where urban dominance is well-established, like europe, guns are seen as vile, not beneficial

      Your characterization is overly broad.

    2. Re:spotless logic by rossifer · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if you remember how you became a fan? I seriously wondered if I should post that previous one AC or not but decided for the AC because it was way off-topic (just nit-picking a single point that wasn't even his argument). This time I figured I'd respond directly. Hope it's constructive. The characterization as a redneck would be really funny if you knew me. Based on other things you've written, I just don't see where the venom comes from.

  235. Where's the barcode scanners when you need them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Generate a unique barcode number and place it on each child in the school. Have teachers and bus drivers scan the barcode to match to a centralized database of where the children should be. Problem solved. Note: an RFID chip could also be planted on the children for the same effect.

  236. Fear, fear and more fear by DeanFox · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I thank God I grew up before cell phones and this 24/7 parental obsession. My son has several friends in those last few years of parental control and it's driving me nutz. We can't even get together and watch a movie uninterrupted.

    One friend, his parents will call to tell him they're leaving his dinner in the fridge. Then call to tell him that the potatoes were over cooked, then call again to ask about next weeks soccer game. And it's literally every 10-20 minutes. If he doesn't answer, they call, call again and again... We'll stop the movie while he takes the call only to find out it's his mom wanting to tell him that next Saturday he has to go to Grandmas or something just as meaningless. If he complains "I'm in the middle of a movie!" She'll bark back "Too bad!, that's why we pay for unlimited cell usage, blah, blah, blah... so we can get a hold of you when we have too. Emphasis on "when we have too" is mine as it's apparently very subjective.

    It's absurd. And, yes, I'm a father.

    If I can't go a night not knowing where my son is, I didn't do my job as a parent. The world is not that scary nor dangerous. My son has a cell and knows how and when to dial 911 if he needs too. And I can certainly go a night not following a red dot on some tracking web page. I am sorry sir, but your fear is way over the top. Of course, as with anything else, that's just my opinion. Is is however a fear that you do share with a lot of other parents. Fear of what I wouldn't know as I don't share it.

    Even in this case of a younger female home late from elementary school because she got on the wrong bus. I still don't see the need for this level of panic or overreaction. But, that's just me. I suspect my son appreciates the levelheadedness of the home he grows up in. I expect his friends do as it's here they all congregate.

    -[d]-

  237. Out come the clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when you don't like the question you decide to not answer it and instead you state that the question shouldn't be asked? Morons. So, just so you understand: your personal views on the validity of the question itself is not an answer to the question. You might think that those 'answers' are of interest, but they aren't. You are a moron for spouting your religious views on the topic. Yes I'm talking to you. Really. Yes you. Not the other guy that did the exact thing you did, I'm talking to you. Moron. Religious freak.

    As for a direct answer to the original question, you should check out cell phones that have this feature built in.

  238. Check out Zoombak by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

    The Zoombak device (http://www.zoombak.com) is about the size of hotel bar of soap. It uses AGPS to acquire fixes and GSM to transmit the device's location. It was originally conceived for use on pets, but was soon adopted for other needs. The "Universal" device is probably what you are looking for (although they can't market the device for tracking children, I'm sure plenty of people do). I put one on my kid with ADHD when he goes on his scout trips. He knows it's there.

    There are other products on the market, but I think the Zoombak device is the most capable. And, unlike products, it actually exists.

    It provides a fix every 15 minutes and the rechargable battery life is about 5 days per charge. You can log into their web portal and request "Find Nows" or enter a continuous track mode.

    You can also access the device's location using SMS. They have several models, Pet, Universal and Auto. I'd recommend the Universal since it provides other attachments that make it useful as a generic tracker.

    They also have special deal going right now - I think it's 3 months free if you purchase the device.

    Can you hack one of these devices or build your own? Not really. A lot of effort went into designing the device to obtain FCC certification - cell carriers in the US require that the device meet their specs before the device is allowed to attach to their network.

    I'd recommend you obtain one of these devices and then bug the company to provide the other features you request. Or, perhaps, ask if they have an OEM version and toolkit.

  239. GPS Tracking Explained by BrianatSentry · · Score: 1

    As someone that is actually in the GPS and child protection business, I can tell you a fair amount about the systems. first, what you are looking for is actually A-GPS technology, or "Assisted" GPS. The device will attempt to acquire it's position via GPS positioning. This requires a view of the sky, the more open the better. Some devices will be able to acquire a GPS fix from inside a building, but the quality of the signal will be much less and therefore the accuracy will suffer. Typically, you will have accuracy within 3 meters, but that can vary up to 50 meters depending on environmental factors. The "assisted" part is that the GPS device then uses cellular technology to broadcast it's position back to a server, which in turn then displays the information via a web portal. Obviously the device therefore also has to be within a cellular coverage area (most GPS devices on the market today utilize TMobile for a cellular provider, we are preparing to switch to AT&T for a much better coverage area). Additionally, since the devices are using cellular networks already, they have the ability to GSM location on top of the GPS location. This helps eliminate the issue of no coverage indoors, but most devices on the market today do not have this feature enabled. Then most device providers also offer additional services via their web portal when you access the tracking (though some companies try to charge more for these services). You can do things such as geofencing (you may want to find a provider offering polygonal geofencing, as radial geofences can wind up encompassing a vast area that is really outside of the safe zone you are trying to create), breadcrumbing, speed warnings, etc...

  240. Android G1 by TheCabal · · Score: 1

    Get an Android G1 phone, turn on the GPS and install Pintail on it.

    You SMS the phone, it replies with its location. Integrates with Google Maps

  241. Unobstrusive device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1) a small unobtrusive device I can place on my daughter,

    Uh, where do you intend to put this device?

    In your daughter's hand, I hope. Aka, a cell phone, right?

    Or is this a futuristic chip implantation type question?

  242. Google Latitude by Ascoo · · Score: 1

    Why not just use a phone that supports Google Latitude? http://www.google.com/latitude/intro.html. All the work has been done for you.

  243. You found the kid, yes? by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was once lost for a considerable time in a department store. Well, I knew exactly where I was. I was in the elevator, because I was 3 or so and elevators are awesome! And I wasn't going to leave the store without Mom. Mom panicked, store management had everyone looking for me and guarded the exits. Found me just fine. I wasn't abducted. I wasn't killed. Societal mechanisms are in place to return wayward children to their parents in the vast majority of cases. Yes, there can be a lot of panic involved, but I would be very interested in seeing statistics on how many lost children are recovered within a couple hours versus how many remain missing for longer periods. Unfortunately, I don't think such statistics could be properly gathered, given how many such incidents are resolved without ever making a blip on statistic-gatherers' radar.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  244. Another spin on the situation by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to belabor the topic of paranoia, but I feel that there is a much more probable situation happening which I didn't see discussed:

    What are the odds for the following:

    Child loses GPS tracking system (most likely a phone):Child gets lost to the point that the police are called

  245. Let Her by stonemetal · · Score: 1

    Let her beat you up a bit then get her arrested. She can get one of those neat leg bracelets from the penal system. Then the cops would know where she was a bring her home if she strayed.

  246. Sprint Family Locator by JayT · · Score: 1

    People are forgetting that this is not the same world that we grew up in. But I see no reason to panic. My daughter started walking home from school this year so I got her a phone with GPS. We already had Sprint so we went with them. Their "family locator" service costs $5/month and you can try it for free if you are already a Sprint user. I can track her via my phone or with a web browser. The service enables you to set up events that you are notified about. For example if my daughter is not home by 3:30 then I get a text message on my phone and my wife and I get an email with the details. If you already use Sprint, you should look into this.

  247. But what about a serious solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He knows his daughter better than we all do.

    Although I agree that using a GPS tracker is crazy when a mobile phone appears more sensible. I don't see any real solutions here to what the guy is asking, after 800 comments. Ignore the morality of it, and you're fairly restricted on options.

    First though, something worth considering is the wikipedia article, and instead of it pushing her GPS location back to you, try a 'data puller' instead, so you can somehow contact the device and get her co-ordinates sent back to you.

    Either way, unless you're looking at installing her with a satellite, connect a very long cable up, or some sort of elasticated wireless router rebroadcasting operation, you've gotta go with the mobile phone network. As far as I know there's only GPS trackers that use the mobile network, or using a mobile phone itself.

    As everyone's mentioned you could use a commercial GPS location service from your network provider, or use a mobile phone and opt for writing your own software. Alternatively if you find the right dedicated GPS commercial device that uses GPRS and uploads it to your own server, then you can deal with it how you like.

    If you're more willing to hack some hardware together yourself, DEFINITELY check out HackADay's section on gps hacks as a starting point.

    I hope this is actually some help to you!!

    1. Re:But what about a serious solution? by duguk · · Score: 1

      argh! and tell her not to drink cider.

      It makes you forget to login on Slashdot before posting a LONG reply.

  248. APRS is free and easy by wigger · · Score: 0
  249. Smother by whong09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I understand that you're concerned for the safety of your child, but you're really assuming the worst will happen. You're also overlooking the fact that your daughter is a bright individual and that she can take care of herself so much as finding her way home or reaching you. Besides, if you start tracking your daughter when do you draw the line? Are you going to make sure that all of her friends are ok to play with? Are you going to pick out what she eats so it's what you think is healthy? At what age do you stop tracking your daughter? What about dating in the future? Are you going to lock your daughter in a tower?
    As a parent I'd rather trust my children and they'd rather have me trust them.

  250. THIS TOPIC IS NOW ABOUT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This topic is now about tracking remote controls, keys and wallets.

  251. Maybe RFID is a better solution? by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Put RFID readers on the buses, RFID tags on the kid's backpacks, and sound an alert when a kid boards who is not assigned to the bus? This ain;t the world I grew up in, where you could cound on the bus driver knowing you; this is the worst of the 21st, where you're lucky if the driver hablamos Ingles.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  252. That's right blame everyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "However, since it took less than three days for my local school district to misplace my daughter, I have decided that something needs to be done. By the school district's own admission it is a recurring problem of placing children on the wrong buses. "

    Yeah... I can already tell you're going to be one of those asshole parents.

    Grow the hell up. Put a dollar in change in your child's hands and a piece of paper with important phone numbers to reach you, it's what my parents did for me and it worked just fine. Problem solved and I didn't even need a cell phone.

  253. I have a better idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replace the bloody-rotten public school system.

  254. The biggest issue by AnAdventurer · · Score: 2, Informative
    And I speak from experience. I am a member of the Special Police Search Team. All we do is search for missing people believed to not be involved in a crime. Mainly it's children (DMD) and other "high risk' individuals (brain injury's, etc), lot's of them have "tracking units" (like Project Life Saver) of some sort. AND EVERY TIME ONE DOES NOT WORK it's because someone forgot to change the batteries. We have meetings and meetings on the subject and do free battery checks to any of our PLSA (project life saver) clients. It's VERY SAD.... We lost a boy in a lake because his mother forgot to change the batteries in his (off the shelf tracker) tracker.

    Like everything else it's up to the end user to make sure the system is working property. I like to toss a SPOT Messenger with tracking mode ON in my son's (who is 7) bag before he heads off to play with his friends.

    I am more then happy to answer questions on the subject, just contact me for more.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  255. Helicopter Parent by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do not deprive your kid of real-life experiences dealing with the unexpected. You can hover over your kid all you like with gps, but some day shes gotta go out on her own. When kids are on their own, unmonitored, they learn to be self sufficient, calm under stress, and resourceful. Just get your kid a phone so she can call you when she gets lost.

  256. Give the world a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Pops, wanna learn about how to spy on someone? Move to the UK!

  257. whats wrong with gps on parolees? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    and what makes you think that has any implications whatsoever as to them being put in my car?

    ah, because you there is a slippery slope. that legislators and average folk don't know the difference between a parolee and a nonparolee's car, and don't care. that gps's are sentient beings that are out to take away your freedoms, propelled in an unstoppable force that proceeds without any human cognition involved. or, no: it is done by human beings. but they have no ability to tell the difference between a parolee and a nonparolee's car, and if the police put a gps on my car, i won't care, no fellow citizen will care, no legislator will care, no judge will care. or know the difference

    please get your head out of your ass

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:whats wrong with gps on parolees? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      whats wrong with gps on parolees?

      If you'll allow me to rephrase that question: "What is wrong with a GPS on a parolee?" Nothing. If there are specific situations where it is deemed necesary, so be it. But when we go from parole being an exercise in trust to just a continued controlled environment, we lose the value of the parole. So using it in specific cases, I'm fine with, but turning it into a system where in every single parolee is issued one and the parole becomes more about tracking a GPS unit than rehabilitating a criminal, the system fails.

      and what makes you think that has any implications whatsoever as to them being put in my car?

      Are you OK with a GPS unit being placed on someone else's car? With out a warrent? With out probable cause? Would you still be OK with it if it were your car? Now what if you have spent your preteen-teen years with a GPS unit on your hip, knowing that you were always being monitored? Woudl you still have the same reservations? Obviously this is all hypothetical as I know I haven't been through such an experience and I would guess that you haven't either. But the concept remains, if you have experienced something to be a social norm your entire youth life, would you be less likely to oppose it in your adult life? I would say the answer to that is almost absolutely yes.

      Would you ever consider it to be socially acceptable to have a government entity place hundreds of thousands of video cameras across major metropolitan areas in the US and to allow for the centralized monitoring of them?

      While that idea is socially unacceptable in the US currently, it is the social norm in the UK.

      Social norms take time to change. Sure, if you asked the average man on the street if they thought slavery should be illegal, you would have near 100% of the respondents say yes. But jump back 100 years, a while after the Civil War had ended, think you would still get 100%? How about 150 years? Just before the emancipation proclamation, think 100% of the average population would stand by your side as being opposed to slavery?

      Heck, go back 50 years and see what the average concensous is on racial integration.

      Social norms are in constant flux. Historically, they have been long slow changes. But with the advent of the internet and great imrpovements in communication, we are seeing social norms develop and change at much faster rates. It will still take generations to propigate a full swing, but thanks to the better communication, not nearly so long as it used to.

      Saying flat out that there is no such thing as a "slippery slope" is as disinginuous as saying that putting a GPS tracking unit on your child will lead to a nation wide GPS mandate. That's is not to say that we should trust all "slippery slope" arguements, nor that the use of GPS monitors by parents may not have a detrimental (IMO) effect on society.

      But we should look at issues from a more pragmatic point of view.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  258. the venom comes by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    from hatred for rural assholes who don't understand how their maladjusted view of the real value of guns in civil society results in hundreds of needless urban deaths every year, or don't care

    and it is venom. and it is hatred. and it based on the inability to get the blind to see how their incoherent opinions lead to unnecessary deaths

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  259. there ARE benefits to gun ownership by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you can stop yourself or someone else from becoming a victim of a crime. this happens all the time, probably every day

    its just that for everyone of these virtuous uses, 10 other people get shot because of mistakes, overheated situations, knuckleheads, etc

    so overall, guns just aren't worth the collateral damage. the collateral damage is greater than any benefit guns convey

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:there ARE benefits to gun ownership by rossifer · · Score: 1

      According to Kleck, the numbers go the other way. For each victim of a crime where a gun was used, there are dozens of cases of successful self-defense using a gun.

      I suspect that you've believed something someone told you and not looked any deeper because the number felt right (or there is no way the authority could be wrong about that).

      Specifically, the most common bad study is the Kellerman study (that a gun is 43 times more likely to kill you or someone you know than to kill someone in self-defense) which is horribly flawed. The study was of a one year period in a Detroit neighborhood overrun with gangs and drugs. Because the drug dealers knew the person they were killing in most of the homicides, those homicides were counted in the "or someone you know" category. That accounted for 37 of the 43x. Of the remaining 6x, there was a very high gun suicide rate in the same neighborhood over the same year, which accounted for 5.5x of the remaining deaths in the "you or someone you know" category. Of the self-defense uses, only those uses which resulted in the death of the attacker were counted in the self-defense category. As stated in my previous post, various criminologists estimate that 80-99% of successful defensive uses of firearms do not involve firing the gun. If we assume that every defensive shot fired killed someone, that shifts the proportion from 10:1 to 200:1 successful defensive uses of firearms to accidents and domestic violence homicides. Since most gunshot wounds are survivable, the number is definitely even lower than that, even in one of the most violent inner cities in the US.

      So even looking at the Kellerman study with a little more insight reveals that the benefits of guns solidly outweigh the costs.

      As for your hatred and venom, well, I'm sorry that that's happening. I don't see changing my mind on something I feel is so clearly beneficial to society and my community without a really compelling argument. The way I understand the issue, you've been misinformed and this particular misinformation appears to have a very real effect on your level of happiness. I sincerely hope that you find a way through this venom and hatred (you don't have to change your mind, but that anger doesn't help you, nor does it help you change anyone's mind).

  260. Name your child Anthrax by incognito84 · · Score: 1

    If you ever lose your kid, just run around screaming "Anthrax! Anthrax!" Until everyone runs away except for your child.

    Well worth the Psychiatry bills, IMHO.

  261. Cell Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I second (third?) the suggestion to use Verizon Chaperone. I wouldn't get the Migo as a few have suggested, the things just too likely to get your kid's ass kicked in school unless they are in like Kindergarten. But Chaperone will run on pretty much any phone. As the kid gets older, if they need discipline, kids will get hooked on text messaging (most likely..) and the threat of revoking text messaging will effectively keep ALMOST any kid in line. (Or, as we suggested in howardforums a few days ago, threaten to switch their normal phone out with a Migo -- this may be a worse threat than taking the phone away entirely.)

  262. Every Device will fail eventually by initialE · · Score: 1

    As a safeguard, teach your daughter about 1. How to avoid strangers, 2. How to find the nearest policeman (yeah I know, can you really trust them? But eventually you're gonna have to trust someone.)

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  263. awesome by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    how you can change the subject and think you have a point

    sing with me

    "one of these things is not like the other..."

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:awesome by rossifer · · Score: 1

      its the regurgitated nra playbook

      That's funny. I refuse to join the NRA because they're pansies who are more often in the way of RKBA than helping it. I do like their "Eddie Eagle" child gun safety training, however, and have paid a small amount of money for those materials.

      do you mix your own propaganda or do you merely regurgitate what's fed to you gimp?

      On the analysis of the Kellerman study, some of the flaws were pointed out by others, some of the flaws were from my own analysis (though I'm sure I'm not alone).

      MORE PEOPLE ARE KILLED BY GUNS THAN SAVED BY GUNS

      BY AT LEAST A FUCKING ORDER OF MAGNITUDE

      understand that ironclad truth you lying turd?

      9,369 homicides/year from firearms in the USA.
      Estimated 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 successful uses of a firearm in self-defense per year (unknown number of lives saved).

      So there are about 250-500 uses of a firearm in self-defense for each firearm murder. Pull it together, dude. Your assertions about the numbers don't stand up to even basic scrutiny.

      HOW MANY VIOLENT CRIMES WERE COMMITTED LAST YEAR

      HOW MANY WERE DONE WITH FIREARMS

      HOW MANY MURDERS WERE COMMITTED LAST YEAR (16,204 in 2006)

      HOW MANY WERE DONE WITH FIREARMS (9,369 in 2006)

      look it up you propagandized asshole

      Well, I looked up the last two , but you have yet to make a connection between these numbers and a claim that guns are a net negative in society. The fact that guns are used for ill is part of their cost to society. The fact that they are also used for good is part of their benefit to society. Any analysis which purports to demonize or valorize guns needs to account for cost and benefit based on real numbers.

      your days are numbered you fucking dinosaur. its all inevitable demographic change from here

      I wonder. As I mentioned earlier, it is my belief that many cultural changes are much like pendulums, swinging from extreme to extreme over long periods of time. Right now, it feels like we're swinging away from the extreme "fear of self" and "fear of neighbor" that motivates gun-banning and headed back towards more of a "trust yourself" and "trust your neighbor" culture that is tolerant of responsible gun ownership. I'm doing my best to make as many of my liberal friends comfortable and safe around guns and they're definitely interested.

      One point in favor of your goals is the increasing difficulty finding affordable places to hunt, and maintaining a hunting culture with increasing population pressure. One of the biggest reasons that my wife and I talk about expatriating or at least moving out of Los Angeles is lack of access to public wilderness nearby as our children grow up. But there is a healthy sport of target and sport shooting that's gaining popularity in urban areas. We'll just have to see if that is sufficient to maintain a gun culture as the country becomes more urbanized.

      I guess we'll just have to wait and see who is right as the struggle to shift the culture plays out. As for our little micro-thread, I wish that it had been nice discussing the issue with you, but your debating skills have been a severe disappointment. Good luck with that.

    2. Re:awesome by rossifer · · Score: 1

      The 2006 numbers that I found were from http://www.nationmaster.com/country/us-united-states/cri-crime

  264. Kajeet by Dragonmana117 · · Score: 1

    I know a cell phone is probably bigger than a RFID bracelet, but the kajeet system is made for parents like you and is fairly cheep (under 40 a month) you could even make it sound like a allowance or reward for her. But best part is you can track them on your cell (assuming you have a smartphone).

    1. Re:Kajeet by Reed+Solomon · · Score: 1

      Or you could build your own into a necklace with GPS and a cheap GSM/3G chip that sends the current GPS location to a website or email address of your preference. You'd probably only need the cheapest data plan. Of course if she goes out of range of any cell towers, you're out of luck. And how would you recharge it? If it runs out of power, thats harsh. Unless its solar powered. But what if the sun goes nova? Too many variables.

  265. awesome by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    its the regurgitated nra playbook

    do you have something to offer besides the usual stilted lying "numbers"?

    do you mix your own propaganda or do you merely regurgitate what's fed to you gimp?

    its a wonderful lesson in half-truths, dubious interpretations, partial context, creative conclusions, preconceptions...

    asshole: more undeserving people are killed by guns in accidents incidents heated arguments and confusion than saved by guns in your boy scout fantasy life of red dawn and dirty harry

    you really want to spin that rock of gibraltar truth you lying sack of shit?

    maybe you are actually deluded and don't believe that. power to you, you paranoid schizophrenic little man. must be quite serene, living on lies and ejecting your human consccience

    MORE PEOPLE ARE KILLED BY GUNS THAN SAVED BY GUNS

    BY AT LEAST A FUCKING ORDER OF MAGNITUDE

    understand that ironclad truth you lying turd?

    i swear you guys are as brainwashed as the fucking church of scientology. its like arguing with a committed creationist retard about evolution, such is your blind deathgrip on lies

    or do you really need me to go down the blind alley of battling statistics with your moronic propaganda?

    ok

    HOW MANY VIOLENT CRIMES WERE COMMITTED LAST YEAR

    HOW MANY WERE DONE WITH FIREARMS

    HOW MANY MURDERS WERE COMMITTED LAST YEAR

    HOW MANY WERE DONE WITH FIREARMS

    look it up you propagandized asshole

    look it the fuck up and get back to me with your serene motherfucking lies. i'm sure the nra playbook addresses this on page 23. please regurgitate the play. why think for once, right?

    blood is on your hands. obviously, not on your conscience, as it is doubtful you have one

    but don't worry about it. the sun is setting on your reactionary retarded little world

    your days are numbered you fucking dinosaur. its all inevitable demographic change from here

    i look forward to the more progressive opinions of your enlightened urban children, as they will inevitably be. see what they see. see what they think the gun represents in their civilian lives, what it inhabits in the landscape: nothing but a threat, even and especially in their own hands

    its sad really, to live as a bitter dead end

    but you're almost reassuring dear nra zombie, to see history come alive, like visiting dodge city or davey crockett's home or seeing a pirate ship: thank fucking god we live in civil society, look how far we've come. even though some retards amongst us still cling to antiquated modes of living, thinking walking around as their own judge jury and executioner makes any fucking sense in the modern western world

    go move to somalia if you want to be fucking relevant, you blind asshole

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  266. you win by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    its obvious to me now that panty twisted hysteria always wins in your mind's eye

    i apologize for trying to argue with you with some logic and reason. that gps in situatian A has nothing to do with gps in situation B. no, obviously wrong

    the truth of course is: we put gps on kids. OMFG ITS AN UNSTOPPABLE SLIDE TO FASCISM

    pfffffft

    fucking fear addled moron

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you win by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll try another angle, maybe that pea sized pebble you call your fucking brain can only comprehend crass statements.

      I am not saying that GPS on child = fascism, you fucking window licker.

      I am saying that if you close your eyes to all threats, fail to consider any of them and to act appropriately, your going to get fucking screwed. So go ahead, act like a fucking todler. Toss out all the ad hominem attacks you like. If that's what makes you feel better about your childish point of view. "Ohh I might be wrong, but that guy is a moron, so I must be right." Good luck with that view on life, I'm sure you'll make it real far.

      Maybe you and the rest of the half minded sheeple twits on either side of the isle are perfectly content to put on the blinders and see nothing but your desires. Happily attacking anyone with a different point of view instead of having an open and free discussion of your differences. Maybe that's the future you want, where if anyone doesn't agree 100% with you, they must be a moron or a terrorist. But personally, I think you're just a fuck wad.

      Hell, you're not even capable of a discussion. You've challenged none of the points I've made through out this discussion. You've just been crying about the fallacy of a slippery slope and attacking people personally. You are an incompotent debater. I can't believe I wasted this many posts attempting to debate someone so mentally handicapped and close minded about such a fine level of nuance. I tell ya what, next time I need a debate opponent over the quality of Saturday morning cartoons, I'll give you a call.

      zOMG look at me, I'm so cool, I can be insulting and use naughty words, I'm so proud of myself. /sarcasm (incase you are too retarded to catch it)

      Loser.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:you win by rossifer · · Score: 1

      I am not saying that GPS on child = fascism, you fucking window licker.

      Give up. He's not here to discuss. He's here to tell you (and me) what the TRUTH is. He's already figured it out and has absolutely no interest in understanding your argument or forming a cogent counter-argument. Your carefully-explained arguments cannot reach their intended target.

      I got stuck in a tangential thread discussing another aspect of personal freedom and societal utility regarding gun ownership and it went nowhere. Lots of effort from me, lots of cussing and "big lie" assertions from him. Now I'm feeling sheepish for wasting all of that time.

      At least his arguments are utterly and completely trounced for the few who will come after and bother to read the thread.

  267. You're missing the point by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    The fact the he insists that it's a Linux based solution goes to show that he's dieing to get some new toys and having a kids tracker seems like a lot of fun. When my local condo complex started having problems with break ins in our garage, I used the excuse to hook up some infrared cameras and use an HTC P3300 as a tracking device for stuff I was sure would be stolen. Built it into an old shuttle PC which I also loaded up with a 3lb lead acid cell that would last for weeks.

    Unlike what some of the other commenters here said about him knowing his kid or the school better than we do, it's more that he knows himself better than we do and he knows he's the type that spends all his time goofing with computers and electronics and recognizes that he is highly likely to lose track of his kid regularly, this way he can have a task bar icon that pops up a "kid location service" map every 5 minutes with an alarm when the kid is "out of bounds". Then he doesn't have to have a clue about his surroundings.

  268. When I was a child, about 3 years old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were out somewhere in the evening, it was kind of dark and I recall a carpark...

    I climbed into the back seat of the wrong car and fell asleep.

    I woke up at a police station and the police asking me questions, I was able to recite my full name, address and telephone number.

    I guess I am lucky I didn't get discovered by a paedophile, but that's another story altogether.

  269. Re:Lojack for Kids by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    Because it is a cop-out. The problem is crappy schools. Since nobody wants to admit the schools CAN'T be fixed they whine and try to solve these ridiculous problems with "technology". Just like giving every kid a computer in school will "educate" them.

  270. What a country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm very glad I live in the Netherlands, where children are happy (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6360517.stm), and don't have to be watched all the time. My children are, er, out at the moment. Yesterday they cycled to the beach.

  271. For fucks sake by Fizzl · · Score: 1

    Jesus christ. Do not go down the slippery slope of person tracking. Your daughter just learned a lesson: check for yourself if you are going to the righ tbus. This scenario will not play again because your unique biological learning device just got smarter.
    I have a 4 year old daughter. I try to explain why I forbid certain things. In the end, I let her hurt herself doing something stupid, as that seems to be the most efficient way of bringing the lecture to the lasting memory. "See, this is exactly what I was talking about, remember?"

  272. obvious answer, cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy her an Android phone, like the TMobile G1, and sign her up for Google Latitude. That should solve it.

  273. This already exists by basiel · · Score: 1

    Hi dude, This program already exists and is commercially available on http://www.ubiest.com/page_id_/lev_/lang_id_2/ctg_cat_id_--/index.htm it is an italian company who demoed such a sollution on one of the LBS fora I went to. Hopefully this helps.

    --
    Vrijgezellenfeest/Teambuilding klik hier
  274. Statistical report by silver007 · · Score: 1

    Number of posts: 951 Number of links to products: 4 Effective success rate: .0042

  275. Public schooling is incompetent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had to pander to every dummy because they insist we're all equal.

    The result is that the school district caters to dummies and alienates smart people.

    If you value competence, you need to hear these two words loudly and clearly: PRIVATE SCHOOL.

    Third worldish USA cannot educate your child well in its public school system.

  276. Cell phone? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    Probably the easiest way to achieve this is to give her a cell phone and pay for the locator service. If she values the phone, she'll keep it with her. However, like several people have already commented, teach your child how to call you. Remember that your primary goal in parenting is to raise a self-sufficient adult. Ending up on the wrong school bus is only the beginning of the crises she will face in life.

    Good luck!

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  277. hey fucktard by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    putting gps on kids

    has

    nothing

    to

    do

    with

    putting

    it

    anywhere

    else

    understand, you ignorant twatstain?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hey fucktard by RingDev · · Score: 1

      How's the air inside your bubble?

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  278. u r obviously a leading member of the brady bunch by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    aka: people with 1/2 a brain;-}

  279. Make her more responsible for herself by miceuz · · Score: 1

    Better teach her not to trust authorities and ask/doublecheck busses before going in. this way you will not make it normal for your doughter to be under survelliance from young age and make her more responsible, more aware person.

  280. Too Late by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    Applied Digital Solutions has had something like this for years.

    I think it is in the "vapor ware" stage and always will be, the company seems to be going nowhere.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_Digital_Solutions

    When I first saw this about a decade ago, I thought, "That is diabolical, I want in." So I bought some stock watched it tank and sold it.

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
  281. Commercial product by Feezle · · Score: 1

    Not what the OP is looking for, but here's a commercial product that tracks buses and children using GPS and RFID.
    Yeah, I know. Big Brother, etc.

  282. Wrong solution by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The problem is in the way the school is handling getting children on the bus.
    Fix that [roblem.

    I is nice to see the Linux comes before your daughters safety, truly hard core.

    Finally, you can NOT have your cake and eat t to. If you can track so can someone else, no exceptions.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  283. Smobile Systems Parental Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please take a look at this link www.smparentalcontrols.com and see if this product fits your needs. SMobile Systems Parental Control Edition has GPS locate functionality built in to the software application for smart phones. This application allows parents to monitor the daily activities of their child's mobile device. Additional features include call monitoring, e-mail and text message monitoring, remote lock, wipe and restore, etc... If you would like to discuss further please contact SMobile Systems at 1-866-323-0480

  284. APRS via Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using HAM radio, I can do this using APRS (http://www.aprs.org) A GPS receiver tied to a mini-computer that you can build as a kit that acts as a modem for a small pocket-sized radio. Byonics (http://www.byonics.com) sells the kits called TinyTrak's or they make an all-in-one package that does this: http://www.byonics.com/microtrak/mtaio.php APRS is the packet radio format of the radio transmission, and it's picked up by APRS users in the area and forwarded over to an internet gateway. Then you could go to http://www.findu.com/ or http://aprs.fi/ to locate your call sign and watch it's movements. I do this all the time with my car and most cities have really good coverage. The only downside is it would require you to get a HAM license (not hard at all) and you can not use encryption at all. You would have to accept the fact that anyone can track your call sign, you don't have to give out your callsign to anyone though.

  285. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do what I do... Have the limo drive pick up the kid and drop him off at the salon where mommy is spending his inheritance.

  286. Get her an iphone jailbroken and... by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

    Findmyi.com

  287. You need a Zoombak Personal GPS Locator by Zoombakguy · · Score: 1

    Check it out at www.zoombak.com. Promo right now is for 3 months free. Least expensive, easiest to use GPS tracker on the market. Thanks. Zoombak Guy

  288. "Estimated 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 successful uses by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    of a firearm in self-defense per year"

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    uhng

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    sweet, sweet delusion

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  289. Re:"Estimated 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 successful us by rossifer · · Score: 1

    I used a summary that I'd read years ago. Here's what a quick Google search says:

    Thirteen surveys, 800k to 3.6M defensive uses/year.

    http://www.guncite.com/kleckandgertztable1.html

    The author (Kleck) of the criminology paper where those charts originally appeared is a widely respected criminologist who is trying to find out which gun control policies might be effective for reducing crime and/or violence.

    You'd like him as he's also pretty hostile to the NRA.

    Step up with some numbers that substantiate your position or go away. As a reminder, you have yet to assemble a cogent argument for your position. So far, all you've done is assert wildly.

  290. why would you want to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is one of the sickest things i have ever heard

    your biological child or not, whatever her age is, even you have no right to destroy her privacy like that

  291. Re:"Estimated 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 successful us by rossifer · · Score: 1

    Do you even want to have a discussion? I honestly feel that (1) the NRA are a bunch of tards and (2) guns are a net benefit to society, most definitely including urban dwellers like myself. You seem to want to be angry and name call.

    If you want to have a discussion, please step up. If not, I'm done. I feel that anyone reading this little exchange between us would feel that I've hugely substantiated my argument that gun ownership is a net benefit in the USA while you have not actually made an argument of your own nor have you refuted even a single point that I've made.

    So, what's your goal here?

  292. i estimate the earth is 6,000 years old by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    do you want to have a level headed discussion with me on that idea?

    or do you want to laugh your ass off at me for being a total fucktard?

    now you know how i feel

    "Estimated 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 successful uses of a firearm in self-defense per year (unknown number of lives saved)."

    well, i want to tell you about the thetans in your body put there by xenu because they were chained to earth volcanoes 10,000 years ago

    not feeling me?

    now you know how i feel when presented with your delusions

    and of course, if i won't sit here and gently hold your hand and keep a straight face while you vomit bald faced lies and pure shit, i'm the party in the wrong

    alriiiigthy then

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i estimate the earth is 6,000 years old by rossifer · · Score: 1

      I have debated with creationists/ID'ers on multiple occasions. I didn't devolve into name-calling and vulgarity to make my arguments with them. I don't think I managed to convince any of them that the solar system and earth is ~4.5b years old, but then you don't really expect to.

      and of course, if i won't sit here and gently hold your hand and keep a straight face while you vomit bald faced lies and pure shit, i'm the party in the wrong

      Is that what you think a debate is? You've been misinformed.

      You honestly believe that all gun owners who think that you should be able to legally 1) own and 2) carry and 3) use a firearm in self defense New York City are so malicious as to just make up "bald faced lies" to substantiate their argument?

      Wow, dude. I've heard of people with trust issues, but I think you just might be the poster boy for my "fear of self" and "fear of neighbor" paper about what's gone wrong in modern American culture. You must have had some really bad experiences there in NYC.

      An old saying, "You can take a horse to water, but you can't make him drink." seems to apply here. You've been told a bunch of simple truthful facts that are very easy to verify in this age of Google, including multiple academic studies showing that guns are not pure evil. However, you're going to have to get to a point in your life where you trust yourself and strangers that you see on the street before any of it makes any sense to you.

      Whatever has gone wrong in your life to make you this way, you have my sympathies.

  293. the earth is 6,000 years old by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i have it on solid authority

    http://www.biblegateway.com/

    wait, why won't you have a discussion with me? you say it's older? prove it. show me your numbers. why are you walking away? you're afraid your so called science will collapse under scrutiny? hah! i knew it!

    zzz

    dude, i have no respect for you. there's nothing to talk about with someone so deluded. you're an asshole with no human conscience

    but please, by all means, take this as proof i won't debate you because you've won the argument

    a creationist would do the same if i blew him off

    like i have a chance to pierce your delusions on a discussion board in a few posts

    delusional state: unpunctured and preserved

    but here's a parting cluebat for you: maybe your numbers are WRONG you hallucinating fuck?

    geee just maybe A LITTLE FUCKING OFF? maybe ORDERS OF FUCKING MAGNITUDE?

    naaaaaaah

    impossible

    but of course, because i won't engage with you, you must be correct, right?

    adios douchebag

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the earth is 6,000 years old by rossifer · · Score: 1

      but here's a parting cluebat for you: maybe your numbers are WRONG you hallucinating fuck?

      geee just maybe A LITTLE FUCKING OFF? maybe ORDERS OF FUCKING MAGNITUDE?

      See, here you've made a specific claim. But you haven't backed it up. Where are your numbers which back up this assertion? Can you find me a link to these numbers? I don't need "proof". That's the request of the religious who don't understand argument and debate. Some evidence will do. I've provided you mine. A link to thirteen studies over the past thirty years which backed up my numbers in depth.

      I say that guns are used in self defense on the order of one million times per year in the USA. You say that's orders of magnitude too high. Okay then. Show me a single published study which estimates the number of times guns are used in self defense in the USA is at or under 50k/year. Just one. Should be trivial if my numbers are that far wrong. Google should make it trivial to find a reference that shows the falsehood of my claims.

      Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

      (Of course, this is a trap since I've loaded the deck against you pretty steeply. My numbers are not only reasonable, they're pretty darned conservative. 750k-3.6m was the numbers in surveys from 1975-1995. There are even more guns and gun owners in the past 14 years and the numbers for successful defensive uses have gone up as well.)

  294. Wherify GPS by amxcoder · · Score: 1

    Several years ago, there was a company called "Wherify" that made a GPS enabled wrist-watch device for this purpose. You could put it on your kid, and it it locked on with a key so it couldn't be removed (it also had a cut-resistant band to help thwart would be kidnappers). You could see your childs location from any web-browser. You could set way-points in so that if you're kid was supposed to be home at 3pm afterschool, and they didn't show up, you would be notified by email. It also had a "panic" feature on it that would allow the child to activate if something bad did happen, that would cause the GPS coordinates to be sent to a dispatcher and you for immediate action. It was water proof etc. Sounds exactly like what you're looking for. Here is a link to it, but I don't know if their sold anymore... http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/wf200.html

  295. PROTECT YOUR FAMILY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how technology totally defeats the purpose of parenting.

    If my parent made me wear a beacon, I would shatter it.

    And I would shatter the replacement unit.

    Save some money and just trust that your daughter is really at class, or volleyball, or the mall.

    She's going to hate you eventually anyway, so why not speed up the process? Please do this.